╌>

Bari Weiss is the Pete Hegseth of journalism

  

Category:  Op/Ed

Via:  bob-nelson  •  11 months ago  •  19 comments

By:   Lucian K. Truscott IV

Bari Weiss is the Pete Hegseth of journalism



Do you have any idea how much of a bumbling just-picked-up-a-paintbrush amateur Bari Weiss is in her new job as Editor-in-Chief of CBS News?


_v=63f541607261480

Hegseth was hired by an idiot who inherited a huge fortune. Bari Weiss was hired by an idiot who inherited a huge fortune.

Is there perhaps a pattern here?

There are links in the seed.





S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F4e8f61d4-ff4e-4071-980b-d10e4ff31dba_860x484.jpeg

Do you have any idea how much of a bumbling just-picked-up-a-paintbrush amateur Bari Weiss is in her new job as Editor-in-Chief of CBS News?

I'll tell you.

She killed the big "Inside CECOT" story about the torture prison in El Salvador that was supposed to run on "60 Minutes" Sunday night. The story involved the Venezuelan immigrants who were flown by Trump's ICE, against a judge's order, to El Salvador, where in the prison they were beaten and sexually assaulted. Weiss told the producers that one of the things the story needed was an in-person interview with chief immigration Nazi, Stephen Miller. She helpfully provided them with Miller's contact information, you know, because Bari Weiss is so plugged-in that she has stuff like White House phone numbers and email addresses at her fingertips.

There are several "as if's" here. As if the producers hadn't thought about interviewing Miller themselves. As if they hadn't already contacted his office and requested an interview or at least on-the-record comments for the DECOT story. As if the damn "60 Minutes" team hadn't been doing this kind of reporting better than anyone on the planet for the last 56 years.

Can you think of another bumbling amateur who is running a large organization he is not qualified to run? Hmmmm…let's see…could it be Pete Hegseth? You remember Major Hegseth, who hadn't run anything larger than a small non-profit supporting veterans before he became Secretary of Defense and was put in charge of more than 4.5 million uniformed and civilian people who work for the Department of Defense. Hegseth was the genius who included his wife, brother, and the editor for The Atlantic in a chat group on Signal as the Navy and Air Force bombed and rocketed Houthi strongholds in Yemen back in March, during which he shared the exact times of attack, what aircraft were involved, and what weapons they were using - all of this in real time as the attack was taking place.

We know enough about Pete to last us about 3 extremely unpleasant lifetimes. Let's have a look at Bari. I'm not going to bore you with the story of her career as a junior editor at the Wall Street Journal and her time writing for and occasionally editing stories for the New York Times editorial section. Enough ink has been wasted on her dramatic resignation from the paper citing the firing of editorial page editor James Bennet and alleged "bullying" by Times staff members for her conservative political views.

Weiss worked for other people at both the Wall Street Jornal and the Times. She had no authority over other employees in either job. It was after her departure from the Times that she became an executive of a conservative-leaning Substack called "The Free Press." I'm sure her newsletter on Substack, which the press refers to as a "media company," made quite a bit of money and employed more people than Weiss herself before it was acquired by Paramount Skydance this year for $150 million.

But she could only have been in charge of a tiny fraction of the estimated 1,700 to 2,500 employees who work for CBS News. And as practically every article written on Weiss has noted, she had zero experience in television or running a large news-gathering organization.

Wow. Maybe Pete and Bari should get together for coffee sometime. She could give him advice on dealing with recalcitrant generals who have no respect for him, and he could tell her a thing or two about how to handle reporters who are going through your drawers asking questions you don't want to answer.

The problem both have is that they were thrust into jobs that are clearly more than they can handle for political reasons, not because they had spent careers building up expertise in their fields. Well, at least Weiss can be said to have had a field with journalism. I don't know what the fuck Hegseth's career amounted to before he walked into the Pentagon, other than flexing his muscles to show off his Nazi tattoos and blathering on Fox and Friends on weekends.

Weiss now has the newsmagazine "60 Minutes" under her control, along with its staff of veteran reporters and producers, not to mention camera and sound people, many of whom have done their jobs in combat zones and places on the planet no person not working for "60 Minutes" would want to find themselves. I'm sitting here at my desk in Milford, PA, writing my Substack column, so I am certainly not putting down Substack as a place of business that can give you experience conveying information to a readership and these days, with live video and video podcasts, a viewing audience. But the Substack "media business" Weiss developed and sold for an obscene quantity of greenbacks did not qualify her to pick the outfits for CBS on the air talent, much less run its worldwide news gathering network.

I have some experience with "60 Minutes," having been interviewed on the program twice. Let me tell you just a little bit about what that's like. Getting a call from a "60 Minutes" producer is, I'm not exaggerating, life changing. It isn't the prospect of "being on TV" and how that might change things in your life and career, which can of course happen. It's…there is no other word for it…gravitas. You're on the phone, and you're thinking, even given all the reporting and writing and covering big stories I've done, these people are the fucking big leagues!

Because they are. Their standards are at the top of television news. I don't mean near the top. I mean the top. Before they even call you, much less interview you on camera, they know everything that can be known about you and what you have to do with the subject of the interview. For one story, they knew everything I had written about the West Point honor code, and they knew as much as anyone could know about a then recent scandal involving cheating at the Academy.

To be honest, it was a little scary. You're thinking, what did I write that they've read? Was I wrong about any of it? Was there anything I learned about the subject after the story was published? Because you can count on it that they know if anything changed between the time of your story and the interview with "60 Minutes."

There was a third time that I was supposed to be interviewed by "60 Minutes." It was 1998, and I had written an op-ed page story for the Times about the school shooting in Jonesboro, Arkansas. An 11-year-old and a 13- year-old had taken guns owned by one of their grandfathers and killed 5 people and wounded 10 at the middle school they attended. It turned out that both boys had been trained by their parents at a so-called "practical shooting course," which taught them how to shoot rifles at human silhouette targets at various distances. My story pointed out the moral incongruity of teaching children to use high-powered rifles in exactly the same way I had been trained to use them in the Army.

Before being called by "60 Minutes," I had been interviewed by Katie Couric on the Today Show about the Jonesboro shooting. On the program with me was the chief spokesperson for the NRA, Tanya Mataxa, who was poo-pooing everything I said as liberal claptrap even though I had been introduced as a gun owner and military veteran with extensive firearms training. Let's just say, the interview wasn't going well. Mataxa was filibustering, dominating the interview. Finally, there was a pause, and I asked Couric if I could ask Mataxa a question. Couric, obviously relieved, said "go ahead."

I asked Mataxa if she thought teaching children to fire at targets in the form of human beings was good parenting, and if the NRA endorsed such "practical shooting courses" for children. Mataxa was stumped by the question. She was unprepared to take a stand in the name of the NRA. She filibustered until Couric interrupted her with "Answer the question, Tanya," in an unusually loud voice for TV. Metaxa blinked into the camera and reached down on the floor next to her chair and picked up a copy of the Washington Post and opened it to a full-page anti-abortion ad and started shouting that "this is what we should be talking about! Killing babies!"

Shocked at this development, Couric shouted over her again: "Answer the question, Tanya!" Mataxa finally answered it, saying that the NRA stood behind parents who wanted to teach their children to shoot at human shaped targets.

I heard from friends with contacts in the NRA that Mataxa was almost fired for that answer. Time passed, and "60 Minutes" called wanting to interview me about school shootings. I said yes, of course, and we set up a time for their producers to come to New Orleans, where I was living at the time, to interview me.

A few days later, I got a call from the "60 Minutes" reporter who was scheduled to do the interview. They had to cancel the interview because no one from the NRA or any of the other pro-gun organizations such as the National Shooting Sports Foundation would appear on a program on which I was one of the interviewees. The reporter explained that they had called every pro-gun group they could find, and the answer was the same. They would agree to be interviewed only if I wasn't on the program.

I told the "60 Minutes" reporter that if they went along with the demands of the pro-gun groups, they were effectively giving them the power to control who they interviewed and what viewpoints would get on the air. He apologized and said there was nothing they could do. They wanted to do a segment on school shootings, which were in the process of becoming a "thing," so they would need to get someone else from a gun control group to interview on the show.

I have told this lengthy story, about which I have written before, because Blundering Bari proceeded to blunder into a very similar thing with "60 Minutes" over the CECOT story. The demand by Weiss that the CECOT segment wouldn't air unless the producers interviewed someone from the Trump administration, preferably the odious Stephen Miller, effectively gave the White House veto power over what "60 Minutes" could put on the air. The Trump administration could continue to refuse to provide people to be interviewed for any story they had problems with.

When an email from Alfonsi leaked that discussed the issues raised by Weiss about the CECOT story, Weiss responded on a morning editorial call, essentially telling staffers that they should keep complaints in-house, implying that she had not been treated with "respect" in Alfonsi's email about the dispute inside CBS News.

Just a squeak of irony from Bari Weiss, whose resignation letter from the New York Times, in which she complained about "wokeism" at the Times, became a cause celeb on the Right.

It's too easy to say that this is what happens when incompetent and inexperienced fools are put in charge of large and powerful organizations such as the Department of Defense and CBS News. But fuck it. It is what happens. Bari Weiss would never have been hired at CBS News if its new owner, David Ellison, wasn't the right-wing son of a right-winger who has given millions to Donald Trump, essentially buying the regulatory good will to gift his son a plaything he will use to keep the White House invitations coming for daddy.

We are already waist deep in dangerous political waters that threaten to swamp the First Amendment along with the 14 th Amendment and every other Constitutional provision that Donald Trump doesn't like, including the 22 nd Amendment that limits a president to two terms in office.

Oh, well, we'll have Bari Weiss picking stories for the CBS Evening News and "60 Minutes" that will tell us when the snakes and gators are about to gobble up all rights under the Constitution.

Won't we?


Red Box Rules

Whatever


 

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Bob Nelson    11 months ago

These people have no idea what they're doing... but they have tons of money and therefore they can do whatever they please.

America, 2025!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    11 months ago

Weiss is a moderate liberal and the reaction to her shows just how unhinged the left and how much they’ve grown to expect legacy media to simply parrot far left propaganda. The thought of actual journalism enrages them 

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.1  Hallux  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    11 months ago
legacy media

News Corp/FOX Corp along with WSJ are legacy media. Grab a shovel and bury the hypocricy. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    11 months ago

NO ONE who supports Trump is a moderate liberal. 

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.2.1  Hallux  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2    11 months ago

Nor are they moderate conservatives, they are one and all the unwashed with a borrowed name.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2.2.2  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  Hallux @2.2.1    11 months ago

They have a name: fascists.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.2.3  bugsy  replied to  Bob Nelson @2.2.2    11 months ago
hey have a name: fascists

Good God!!!

Is there anyone in this world you disagree with that you do not think are fascists?

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2.2.4  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  bugsy @2.2.3    11 months ago
Is there anyone in this world you disagree with that you do not think are fascists?

Of course. I only use the word "fascist" when it is applicable, as with Trump supporters and/or MAGAs.

I used to say that such people were "either fascists or fascist fellow-travelers", but enough information is available to all of us now that "fellow-traveler" is no longer viable. It's no longer possible for anyone to claim they don't understand what Trumpism/MAGA are doing. So now I just call them all what they are: fascists.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.2.5  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2    11 months ago
NO ONE who supports Trump is a moderate liberal. 

Explain how Weiss supports Trump without "She'll sometimes criticize a Democrat for lying, therefore she's a fascist" arguments that the left has been reduced to. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.6  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.5    11 months ago
Weiss, a former   New York Times   columnist known for her fierce opposition to identity politics and “cancel culture,” has long positioned herself as a voice for what she calls “the politically homeless.” But since joining forces with Ellison, her stance has tilted sharply toward Trump-era populism.

“The message was clear: this isn’t Cronkite’s CBS anymore,” said one anonymous producer. “It’s Weiss’s America — where MAGA-friendly voices get prime time, and dissenters get the door.”

CBS Bloodbath: Bari Weiss, Trump’s New Media Darling, Axes Entire Shows in MAGA Makeover – Chronology
 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.2.7  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.6    11 months ago

So she's a "Trump supporter" because she's not a racist and opposes mccarthyism. 

You are making my case for me. Anyone who deviates the slightest from far left orthodoxy gets denounced as a "trump supporter"

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.8  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.7    11 months ago

What are Bari Weiss' credentials to run a major television network news department ? 

She doesnt have any. 

She was anointed by Trump and the Ellisons  because she is very vocally anti-woke.  That is not a qualification. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.2.9  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.8    11 months ago

Lol. She was an editor and writer at the two biggest newspapers in the country and then founded was an editor in chief of a massively successful media company.  Qualifications don't get much better than that. 

It's amazing how possessive the left is what are supposed to be "independent" media.  That Bari Weiss, a liberal, is too "right wing" for CBS shows just how insanely biased the legacy media has become. 

e is very vocally anti-woke

SO anyone who doesn't subscribe to race based determinism is unqualified to lead a network?  Again, you are making my point. Look what you are demanding what are supposed to be independent  journalists to pay homage to.  The media bubble the left wing has fortified itself is impressive if nothing else. The entitlement  to ideological obedience from the media has grown so strong over the decades. . 

Bari Weiss had a falllout with the Wall Street Journal because they wouldn't let her be as critical of Trump and his supporters as she wanted to be.....And she's still way too "right wing" and Trump friendly for progressives. You can't make it up. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.10  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.9    11 months ago
Bari Weiss  ( / ˈ b æ r i   w aɪ s /   BARR -ee   WYSS ; born March 25, 1984) is an American political commentator who is the  editor-in-chief  of  CBS News .  She was an  op-ed  and book review editor at  The Wall Street Journal  from 2013 to 2017  and an op-ed staff editor and writer on culture and politics at  The New York Times  from 2017 to 2020.

She was not top or senior level at either The New York Times or The Wall St. Journal.   So she had a hit web site.  I wouldnt say Cenk Uygur or Anna Kasparian are qualified to head CBS News either. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.2.11  bugsy  replied to  Bob Nelson @2.2.4    11 months ago

Do you believe all Trump supporters are fascist?

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2.2.12  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  bugsy @2.2.11    11 months ago

Yes.

I used to accept that some of the fringe might be unaware of just how hard-core Trump's fascism is... but as time has passed that position has become untenable. The President's assaults everything that made America "better" have filled the media since his inauguration. So now... yes.

ALL Trump supporters are fascists.

Although flagged for a Sweeping Generalization, Bob Nelson is responding to a direct question using the same words.  Ticketing Bob would be condoning entrapment,

especially since the questioner and the flagger were the same person.

Therefore, the flag was removed without penalty.  SP

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.2.13  bugsy  replied to  Bob Nelson @2.2.12    11 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
3.1  Split Personality  replied to  JohnRussell @3    11 months ago
  • Overall, we rate The Free Press as Right-Center biased due to its consistent criticism of left-leaning views , especially on cultural and social issues . We rate them Mixed for factual reporting because, while articles are generally well-sourced, the outlet often presents one-sided opinion pieces that lack counterarguments or broader contextual balance.
The Free Press (Common Sense) - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check
 
 

Who is online










102 visitors