╌>

Caitlin Clark finally breaks her week-long silence after being punched in the throat by Alyssa Thomas

  

Category:  Sports

Via:  vic-eldred  •  4 months ago  •  18 comments

By:   Story by Jon Root

Caitlin Clark finally breaks her week-long silence after being punched in the throat by Alyssa Thomas
To the specific foul from Thomas, Clark made a definitive statement. "I don’t think it was up for debate… You can go back and watch the clip. I think it was straight forward."

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Caitlin Clark  has finally broken her silence on the punch to the throat by Phoenix Mercury forward Alyssa Thomas.

While speaking to the media on Friday morning, Clark opened her lengthy five-minute statement by saying, "First of all, I know what you’re going to ask, and I did think it was a flagrant foul. Our reffing just needs to be better." Clark then gave the officials some grace stating that "it’s one of the hardest jobs in the world."

The conversation about protecting players, specifically, has been a heavily debated topic and to that Clark said, "The league has to do better protecting our players."

To the specific foul from Thomas, Clark made a definitive statement. "I don’t think it was up for debate… You can go back and watch the clip. I think it was straight forward."

This response could be seen as a subtle jab at Phoenix Mercury head coach Nate Tibbetts and ESPN’s Chiney Ogwumike. Ogwumike claimed, "When narratives are created  based off of a freeze-frame , that can create a huge problem. The league was reacting to the optics of that image." Tibbetts claimed something similar when he  spoke to the media . "The goal is to clean up our game, but I do think it’s important not to rely on social media screenshots. This is a slippery slope."

Another aspect in the aftermath of  Thomas’ flagrant foul  and weak suspension in my opinion, was how Thomas has played the victim. She has claimed death threats have been hurled her way, Fever head coach Stephanie White has denounced the "hate," and  WNBA media  has been crying nonstop with inflammatory claims that Fever/Clark fans are spewing racism and division.

To this, Clark stated, "The harassment and the hate. None of that is ok."

The WNBA’s biggest superstar also stated how difficult it’s been to handle all of the controversy over her first three seasons in the league. "I’m not a robot. I have emotions. I have feelings… I’m 24 years old trying to navigate a lot… There are times where it’s hard."

Clark then spoke about how this conversation going on for over a week is a "disservice" to her team, her opponents, and the other "talented" players in the W. She wrapped up this point by stating, "It’s all of our jobs to help refocus the narratives."

There has undoubtedly been countless conversations about how the  Indiana Fever  has handled protecting their star. Fans have grilled General Manager/Chief Operating Officer Amber Cox to head coach Stephanie White for a perceived lack of support for what Clark has been subjected to this season, and since she joined the league. To that, Clark made it clear that she feels supported:

"I’m thankful to be here in an organization to has my back and will always stand up for me."

The storylines have been all over the place when it comes to sports media. While Clark has been adamant about staying off social media as much as possible, she expressed frustration with an article from The Athletic.

"The headline read like, ‘This Season Has Been Everything But Fun, Full of Frustration for Clark and the Fever.’ And I’m like, 'No one ever asked me that.' That’s wrong!"

The title of that article is "Why aren’t we having fun yet? This season’s Caitlin Clark experience just isn’t enjoyable," where writer Candace Buckner makes definitive claims about Clark and her fan base. "Today, her team, which has championship aspirations, is a meh 10-8. Her base rallies around one thing: not the times when Clark builds on her league record of 20-point and 10-assist games, but when their communal claws come out against the WNBA. Her league stays in constant reactive mode, accused of failing to protect its star of stars. Her coach, Stephanie White, spends as much time serving as Clark’s personal injury lawyer (and a convincing one, at that), as she does drawing up X’s and O’s.


And guess who’s having the least fun of all? Caitlin Clark."

Clark ended her statement on a positive note , imploring everyone to "get back to a lot more smiling and positivity. I think our world could use a lot of that."

Clark also made it clear before she opened it up for questions that she would still be sidelined for Sunday’s game against A’ja Wilson and the  Las Vegas Aces .


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    4 months ago

Here we have a league that can't rise to do what is right or protect its most important player. We have refs who look the other way and then there is the big elephant in the room: the many black racists who play basketball in the WNBA.

They suspended the player who threw the punch for a day. The foul should have carried a seasonal suspension. And what of the black Mercury players who were so slow to get up and off of Clark, leaving her like dead meat on the floor?

This is the country that democrats have created. I'll say it again: They are a revolutionary party, and they need to be stopped.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.1  Split Personality  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    4 months ago

So what do you say about the American soccer player who was suspended under similar circumstances.

In real time it was a typical yellow card, the American failed to touch the ball and got the other player on the ankle with his right boot.;

the other player buckled and went through the usual histrionics.

VAR focused on the frozen image which made it look like a broken ankle.

our black guy gets tossed and suspended and their white guy laughs it off and plays the rest of the game.

This is the country that democrats have created.

No it isn't . Stop whining and overreacting.

I'll say it again: They are a revolutionary party, and they need to be stopped.

You would not be here but for the revolutionaries in Boston who were largely responsible for starting the War.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Split Personality @1.1    4 months ago
So what do you say about the American soccer player who was suspended under similar circumstances.

I say it's the wrong analogy. The only athlete I compare Clark with is Jackie Robinson.


No it isn't .

Oh, yes, it is.


You would not be here but for the revolutionaries in Boston who were largely responsible for starting the War.

A different kind of Revolutionaries, not Socialists & Marxists.

I know US history.

04themorning-nl-250-minuteman-jumbo.jpg

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    4 months ago
The only athlete I compare Clark with is Jackie Robinson.

The one she is most comparable to is Larry Bird.  There were excellent white basketball players prior to Larry Bird ( Jerry West and John Havlicek come immediately to mind) but Bird was considered the anomaly, a white superstar in an era of black dominance. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.1.3  Split Personality  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    4 months ago
I'll say it again: They are a revolutionary party, and they need to be stopped.

let us quote Jefferson...

eCgvJl1QRtQFRkpvWTUD2vjLsqQ.svg

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

This quote comes from a letter Thomas Jefferson wrote to William Stephens Smith on   November 13, 1787 , while Jefferson was living in France. In the letter, Jefferson was commenting on   Shays' Rebellion   in Massachusetts and the broader challenges of maintaining liberty in a republic. He wrote that occasional uprisings and sacrifices are a natural part of preserving freedom, stating that the "tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants" and describing this as its "natural manure" (Monticello.org)   th?id=ODF.BEp_BaaGB2nL58W14nj-5w Thomas Jefferson's Monticello +1 .

Context and Meaning

Jefferson’s metaphor of the "tree of liberty" emphasizes that   freedom requires vigilance and sometimes sacrifice . While the quote is often cited to justify rebellion, Jefferson also noted that such uprisings were often   founded in ignorance rather than wickedness , and the proper remedy was to   educate, pardon, and pacify   the participants rather than encourage indiscriminate violence (Snopes)   th?id=ODF.UkbcyiagRbzD1gulUr5Adg Snopes.com . The quote reflects his belief that liberty is dynamic and must be actively maintained, not passively assumed.

Do you contradict Jefferson?

I know US history.

Nice picture from Minuteman National Park.  The bronze statue was made from 7 CSA cannons after the Civil War.

While you are busy trying to define Democrats as commies and socialists, you should remember what the British felt for your Minutemen long before "commies" was a slur.

eCgvJl1QRtQFRkpvWTUD2vjLsqQ.svg

How the British Government Described the Rebels and Minutemen

During the early stages of the American Revolutionary War, the British government and military leadership portrayed the colonial forces — including the   Minutemen   — in a highly negative light, framing them as   untrained, unruly, and dangerous rebels .

Rebels in general
The British described the American colonists as  “rebels”  in official correspondence and proclamations, emphasizing their refusal to accept British authority and their intent to break away from the Crown. They were often depicted as  disloyal subjects  who had abandoned the principles of the British Empire, and their actions were condemned as acts of  treason and sedition   Wikipedia . The term “rebels” was used to delegitimize their cause and justify military action.

Minutemen specifically
The Minutemen, though part of the colonial militia, were singled out for criticism because of their  readiness and mobility . The British saw them as  “minute”  — ready to act at the slightest provocation — which they interpreted as a threat to British order. In official reports, they were described as  “armed and ready to fight at a minute’s notice” , a phrase that the British used to highlight their unpredictability and potential to disrupt British operations  Wikipedia +1 . This characterization was part of a broader effort to portray the Minutemen as  irresponsible, politically unreliable, and dangerous to British control .

Strategic framing
By labeling the Minutemen as “minute” and the colonists as “rebels,” the British aimed to:

  • Justify the use of force against them.

  • Portray them as a destabilizing element rather than legitimate defenders of their communities.

  • Undermine colonial morale by emphasizing their perceived lawlessness.

In short, the British government’s descriptions painted the rebels and Minutemen as   lawless, dangerous, and determined to overthrow British authority , which helped to frame the conflict as a matter of imperial order versus colonial insurrection  

Lucky for us.

I'll say it again: They are a revolutionary party, and they need to be stopped.

More proof  of your tunnel vision, sky is falling and victimhood.

The DSA has 100,000 members, they don't even scare the Green Party for land's sake.

Stop over reacted

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    4 months ago

First of all , there was no "punch" to Clark's neck. For some unknown reason Thomas bent over and placed her closed fist on Clark's neck. There was no excuse for it and it was deliberate.

There is no doubt that some of the black players , some of whom are close to equal (or perhaps even better than Clark) are envious of her popularity.  I dont know that that constitutes racism, but it may be in some cases. 

The refs need to do a better job. 

 
 
 
shona1
Professor Quiet
2.1  shona1  replied to  JohnRussell @2    4 months ago

Morning... thought the same when they showed the clip here, there was no "punch" the hand was pressed into her throat which should not have happened..

Basketball is starting to remind me of soccer, the players rolling around and flopping about on the ground when there has been virtually no contact...all trying to get a freebie..

That's the trouble with sports these days once the mega millions come into it all turns cactus..

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.2  Split Personality  replied to  JohnRussell @2    4 months ago
The refs need to do a better job. 

Always.  Can you name a sport where that isn't true?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  JohnRussell @2    4 months ago
some of the black players , some of whom are close to equal (or perhaps even better than Clark) are envious of her popularity. 

I'm not exactly sure why this has become a race thing, there have always been tiffs between players whether in the NBA or WNBA where tempers flare. Why is this being turned into some "reverse racism!" thing? Do we do that every time a black player flagrantly fouls a white player in the NBA? Or when a white player flagrantly fouls a black player? They're playing a sport and playing it at the highest level, there's a lot of egos and personalities and toes that get stepped on no matter what color your skin is.

It seems this is just being leaned into as a racial thing because some fuck wad Trump supporters and other white nationalist dip shits are desperate to start a race war, possibly because they got dropped on their heads as babies and decided to blame black people for it. Anytime they see a white person not getting preferential treatment and basically getting shit on like everyone else in the world every day, they go ballistic bigot and start screaming about some perceived injustice against the white race. If watching that clip of Caitlin getting fouled gets a person defensive about their race and not just better refereeing, they're clearly fucked up in the head and need therapy. If someone sees that clip and thinks "The refs intentionally didn't call it because Caitlin's white!", they're clearly fucked up in the head and need therapy. Refs miss fouls all the time, even flagrant ones, and many of the players fouling are white.

I used to watch Bill Laimbeer, a white player, just intentionally crush some black players with a "hard foul". Was that racist every time he did it? Fuck no. Hard fouls were part of the game for a long time, and while I'm glad they've cracked down and added additional rules to keep players safe, they're still going to happen and 99.9% of them have nothing to do with race and mostly to do with adrenaline, ego and/or revenge for an earlier perceived hard foul or wrong.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.3.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.3    4 months ago

Caitlin Clark is obviously not the first white player in the league. She's not even the first great white player in the league. 

I'll tell you where race comes into this. Before she ever set foot on a WNBA floor for her first practice Caitlin Clark was being described as THE player that would take the league to a new level in public perception ,and popularity.  Black players thought that was unfair to them. The WNBA has been around for decades and there have been great players that barely got a tenth of attention Clark got from the public. They think it is because they were black, and female of course. 

Historically black people have considered basketball to be their game. Whether that is "fair" or not it has been the case. It obviously upsets some of them to see this white bread girl from Iowa become the face of womens basketball. 

Does anyone think the college rivalry between Clark and Angel Reese was not about race?  They dont even play the same position. They generally dont guard each other during a game, but that was the rivalry and the media tried to carry it over into the pros. 

I just think its a sad situation that everyone cant just celebrate womens basketball for what it s - high level sport. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.3.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.3.1    4 months ago
I just think its a sad situation that everyone cant just celebrate womens basketball for what it s - high level sport. 

My advice for Clark is to quit the WNBA and go play in Europe. Much better for her health and that would leave the WNBA right where it was before Clark came along and began to get people out to watch the games.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.3.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.3.2    4 months ago
My advice for Clark is to quit the WNBA and go play in Europe.

LOL

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.3.4  Split Personality  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.3.2    4 months ago
My advice for Clark is to quit the WNBA and go play in Europe.

because the aren't any black women players in Europe? 

How naive are you?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
3  Tacos!    4 months ago

There’s a lot of stupid hate and jealousy in the league for CC, for sure. But that doesn’t mean every thing that comes her way is evil. At full speed, this looked like an accident to me. And she seems to be ok. Had this been intentional, I believe the results would have been a lot more severe.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4  charger 383    4 months ago

some players can't see who brings the league the money

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
5  charger 383    4 months ago

Is WNBA still losing money?   

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6  Sean Treacy    4 months ago

The attacker is the victim and the victim is the villain in the twisted world of woke WNBA identity politics. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.1  bugsy  replied to  Sean Treacy @6    4 months ago
The attacker is the victim and the victim is the villain

But only if the victim is a straight white female and the attackers are black lesbians

 
 

Who is online







88 visitors