╌>

The latest nationwide injunction

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  vic-eldred  •  3 months ago  •  32 comments

The latest nationwide injunction
Talwani, an appointee of former President Obama to the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, wrote in Tuesday’s 27-page ruling that the order is “causing confusion” and “threatening both increasing chaos and an erosion of trust in our democracy.”

Yesterday a federal judge, Indira Talwani (no kidding, that's her name and I'll give you one guess who appointed her), for the second time issued a nationwide injunction blocking the US Postal Service from enforcing an executive order on voting by mail, which directed the agency to only supply mail-in ballots to states that provided the federal government with lists of eligible voters.

The Supreme Court as well all know gave district judges a narrow loophole to issue injunctions. They needed plaintiffs citing injury. Back in June she issued the first injunction on behalf of 20 blue states. This time around the plaintiff is "the League of Women Voters" who claim, believe it or not that women are unfamiliar with US Post Office procedures! (Do they think women are dumb?)

Trump's executive order, issued back in March, gave states until 60 days before the Nov. 3 midterms to notify USPS if they intend to submit a list of eligible voters based on citizenship data if they want to receive mail-in ballots.


The DOJ asked the Supreme Court to decide if the injunction has merit. Keep in mind that: The federal government presides over the US Post Office, not the state of Massachusetts.


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    3 months ago

To be decided sooner rather than later.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
1.1  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    3 months ago

States decide their election rules, not the liars trying to elect morefools

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Igknorantzruls @1.1    3 months ago

States do not tell the US Post Office what to do. It is part of the federal government.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    3 months ago

States do not tell the US Post Office what to do. It is part of the federal government.

So you're saying that the federal government SHOULD be able to interfere with state's election policies?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.3  devangelical  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.2    3 months ago

it'll be hilarious transforming the current ICE detention camps into maga re-education camps, for those complicit in trump's unconstitutional activities, that don't have the immunity their savior has ...

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1.1.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  devangelical @1.1.3    3 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.5  devangelical  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.1.4    3 months ago
And you all claim MAGA are fascists

... and don't forget racist.

Yesterday a federal judge, Indira Talwani (no kidding, that's her name and I'll give you one guess who appointed her), for the second time issued a nationwide injunction blocking the US Postal Service from enforcing an executive order on voting by mail

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1.1.6  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  devangelical @1.1.5    3 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.7  Ozzwald  replied to  devangelical @1.1.3    3 months ago
it'll be hilarious transforming the current ICE detention camps into maga re-education camps, for those complicit in trump's unconstitutional activities, that don't have the immunity their savior has ...

We'll have to build more...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.8  devangelical  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.7    3 months ago

fuck that noise, they already think we're commies, all we have to do is tell them they're going to a camp ...

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
Professor Participates
1.2  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    3 months ago

I see Vic, you are still deeply rooted in the "Dirty Diaper Donnie" plan to corrupt elections, manipulate VOTERS' choice, and help Donald J. Trump get re-elected to a THIRD TERM because you believe that the ADJUDICATED RAPISTS, personal friend of Epstein, CONVICTED FELON, and Murderer is your choice for best PRESIDENT ever.


 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.3  Gsquared  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    3 months ago
Indira Talwani (no kidding, that's her name and I'll give you one guess who appointed her)

Is she related to this woman?

Usha Bala Vance née Chilukuri

                 240716-usha-vance-ch-1022-2d485c.jpg

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.3.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Gsquared @1.3    3 months ago
(no kidding, that's her name

Their selective xenophobia is glaring. I'm sure they're thinking when they see Vance's wife "Well, she's one of the 'good' ones...". Fucking racist nimrods.

jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3.2  devangelical  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.3.1    3 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.3.3  evilone  replied to  devangelical @1.3.2    3 months ago
word has leaked about stephen miller's wife being a DC bicycle before he got his turn to ride ...

That says more about Swalwell than Katie Miller. Then again... I wondering how someone goes from Democratic intern to MAGA shitbox influencer. 

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
2  Nerm_L    3 months ago

Would President Trump endorse vote-by-mail if the ballots were handled by FedEx?  Or United Parcel Service?  We know DHL wouldn't get the nod.

Seems like this is as much about whipping the culture war pony of the evil Postal Service as it is about voting.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  JohnRussell    3 months ago

This is a 66 year old woman, born in Englewood New Jersey , and you have the gall to question her American standing and heritage.   

You need to get a grip while you still have time. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @3    3 months ago
According to her official biographical information, Talwani — an American federal judge serving on the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts — was born on October 6, 1960, in Englewood, New Jersey   Wikipedia +2 . She is the daughter of Manik Talwani, a geophysicist from Punjab, India, and a mother of German heritage   grokipedia.com . This birthplace is consistently cited in authoritative sources, including the Federal Judicial Center and her Wikipedia entry, confirming Englewood, NJ, as her place of birth   bing.com +2 .
 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
3.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @3    3 months ago
This is a 66 year old woman, born in Englewood New Jersey , and you have the gall to question her American standing and heritage.   

I'll take "Things that only happened in your imagination" for $400 Alex.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.2.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.2    3 months ago
 Indira Talwani (no kidding, that's her name)

That is from the seeded article written by the seeder. What do you think the meaning and implication of that phrase is ? 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
3.2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.1    3 months ago
[deleted]
[✘] What do you think the meaning and implication of that phrase is ?

I think the author is pointing out that this is actually her name. But, I'm guessing you looking for racism, found it.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
3.2.3  CB  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.2.2    3 months ago
Yesterday a federal judge, Indira Talwani (no kidding, that's her name and I'll give you one guess who appointed her), for the second time issued a nationwide injunction blocking the US Postal Service from enforcing an executive order on voting by mail, which directed the agency to only supply mail-in ballots to states that provided the federal government with lists of eligible voters.

Talwani is a federal judge APPROPRIATELY appointed by the President with what conservatives call a "funny sounding name" and self-assigns as a black man. Obama's mother is white and father black. We can just use our imagination to come up with the oddity of a man calling himself a white man when he has skin as brown as Obama's. . . I digress.

I find it humorous ("ha-ha") that had either Obama or Talwani allowed themselves to be card-carrying conservatives. . . if their names would be 'fun' for the MAGA crowd. After all, Hogan Gidley, Tommy Tuberville, Todd Schnitt, Juan Ciscomani, Ted Cruz, Victoria Spartz, and Marco Rubio are not "proper" CONSERVATIVE names if you think about it.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4  Hallux    3 months ago

"Yesterday a federal judge, Indira Talwani (no kidding, that's her name and I'll give you one guess who appointed her) ..."

Not to worry Vic, she is balanced by the equaly weirdly named Kash Patel ... @!@ ... good grief man get a grip.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
5  evilone    3 months ago

So, no quotes on the ruling, just a broad condemnation and insinuations of partisanship? How about all the other federal judges that have blocked Trump's order? The DoJ has asked the SCOTUS to take up the ruling too. Will they be partisan if they decline to take it up, or rule against Trump?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  evilone @5    3 months ago
How about all the other federal judges that have blocked Trump's order?

Feel free to list them.

The DoJ has asked the SCOTUS to take up the ruling too.

And the results are where?  I don't see your link.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
6  CB    3 months ago

Is the woman/judge an American citizen or not, Vic? If yes, then what is YOUR problem with that?!  And what the heck is this about a name? "Tawani' is a problem for MAGA? Get a life. Just look at some of the 'tribal' names used in the GOP for which you decidedly never find 'fault' with! MAGA supporters need to grow up and leave this juvenile namecalling behind!

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1  devangelical  replied to  CB @6    3 months ago

[deleted] [✘] the [✘] stories coming out now about most of the maga senate being closeted ...

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
6.1.1  CB  replied to  devangelical @6.1    3 months ago

What is so tragically pathetic about this is, these are the same people that spout individualism and free speech rights. . . and choose to mock people for what they wish to be called! Stupidly ridiculous.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
6.1.2  Igknorantzruls  replied to  CB @6.1.1    3 months ago
mock people for what they wish to be called! Stupidly ridiculous.

If that's what they wish to be called, shouldn't Ridiculous be capitalized ?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
6.1.3  CB  replied to  Igknorantzruls @6.1.2    3 months ago

No. Not in this case. It's a phrase that carries a sense of a thing being pessimiscally laughable.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
7  Tacos!    3 months ago
no kidding, that's her name

Why would you say that? What is the significance?

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
7.1  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Tacos! @7    3 months ago

Amazing how Kash Patel is accepted in this maga movement bowel, cause just wow, when a persons name can disqualify their ability to think and act responsibly about their intended capacity in their present role of employment, cause there should not be, yet, on a daily basis, we see, how ones like Vic, can think while holding their lighter Bic, too enlightened for sun glasses, as hope they're smoking moon rock bowls,lost their soles, N it's the Agony of Defeat

 
 

Who is online







88 visitors