╌>

Canadian prime minister suspends trade talks with U.S., setting new 50% tariffs in motion

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  perrie-halpern  •  3 months ago  •  11 comments

By:   Megan Shannon

Canadian prime minister suspends trade talks with U.S., setting new 50% tariffs in motion
A new wave of tariffs will hit Canada early Saturday morning, with steep 50% duties in effect at the stroke of midnight.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Aug. 21, 2026, 11:48 PM EDT / Updated Aug. 22, 2026, 2:48 PM EDTBy Steve Kopack and Alexandra Marquez

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney on Saturday morning called steep new U.S. tariffs on a wide swath of his country's goods "a miscalculation" after trade talks with Canada collapsed late Friday night.

The 50% duties went into effect at the stroke of midnight. Carney blamed the breakdown of talks on what he said were the Trump administration's "uneconomic" and "unfair" demands.

"In recent days, the United States proposed new terms that were uneconomic, unfair, and undermined the net benefits for Canada, and called into question the reliability of any deal. In short, they asked too much, and they offered too little," Carney told reporters at a press conference.

After weeks of talks, Carney on Fridayannounced that while important progress had been made, "that progress has not been enough to meet our objectives for Canadians."

"As a result, this evening, I have decided to suspend trade negotiations with the U.S. and have directed Canada's negotiators to return to Ottawa," Carney said in an emailed statement minutes before the deadline.

On Saturday, he thanked the negotiators, saying, "They've worked hard in good faith, right up to the last minute, to defend the interests of Canadians," but ultimately they had to reject what he said was "a bad deal."

The tariffs affect about $20 billion worth of U.S. imports from Canada, according to the U.S. trade representative's office. The import taxes will hit everything from hockey sticks to some building materials, liquors and certain kinds of clothing.

Carney said in Friday's statement that Canada will immediately retaliate against the U.S., matching "those tariffs dollar for dollar to protect our workers and businesses."

On Saturday, the prime minister said Canada was pursuing a "focused response," with tariffs on the U.S. "concentrated in sectors such as steel, dairy, appliances, agricultural equipment, pulp and paper, and electronics." The duties would take effect Sept. 8, he said.

Asked at the news conference why it felt like Carney was "going to war," the prime minister responded, "Because we were attacked."

The White House did not immediately respond to NBC News' request for comment.

The failure by American and Canadian trade negotiators to reach a deal came after nearly two weeks of furious talks. It was also a dramatic reversal from Tuesday, when President Donald Trump paused the tariffs for three days, writing on social media that the two sides "have a DEAL!"

Officials on both sides had seemed optimistic about a deal up until the very last moment. On Thursday, the Canadian minister responsible for U.S. trade relations met with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer for several hours.

"We're very close, we continue to make progress and we're going to stay here and do the work that is necessary until we get to that point," Dominic LeBlanc told reporters as he left Greer's office late Thursday.

Canadian negotiators met again with their U.S. counterparts on Friday and talks stretched until the final hours of the day. Officials remained at the U.S. trade representative's office past 10:30 p.m. ET Friday. But ultimately, the two sides were unable to reach a compromise.

In his statement on Friday, Carney said "last-minute changes in the U.S. proposed terms were unfair, uneconomic, and called into question the reliability of any deal."

"We have recognized from the beginning that America has changed, and that we will not return to our old relationship," Carney said. "Canada has what the world wants. And we will not allow any nation to determine our future."

In a press conference Saturday, Carney elaborated on the "last-minute changes" that the U.S. requested to be made to the deal. He said one change was that Americans wanted to limit tariffs "to autos only [and] ... not include medium and heavy duty trucks, which is a big change."

Carney also said the U.S. introduced "in the last hours efforts to restrict our ability to have other trade deals," noting that such proposals would have affected trade and security agreements Canada had struck with other countries. He added that American negotiators also sought "to restrict our protections of our language, our culture, and in effect, our sovereignty," but he did not provide details on the issue.

The last-minute changes weren't the only reason Carney said he directed Canadian negotiators to withdraw, but, "it was also a cumulative aspect, as I mentioned in my remarks, about the willingness in total to enter into a true economic partnership."

Greer said in a statement early Saturday that Canada "declined to finalize the trade deal under the terms agreed earlier this week."

"Despite the U.S. offer to Canada to receive the best treatment of any major exporter to our market, new demands and walk backs of other commitments by Canada have upended the careful balance reached in the past days," he said.

"We don't have new talks planned with the Canadians," Greer added in a Saturday-morning interview on Fox News. "We've said enough, and so we've taken countermeasures." He also said the U.S. would "respond to Canadian retaliation."

Greer said that a point of contention was Canada continuing to maintain its retaliation against the United States "including, among other things, flat-out prohibitions on certain American goods and services." Those bans, introduced by Canada's provinces on the sale of American alcohol, were introduced in 2025 in retaliation for earlier waves of Trump's tariffs on Canada.

As talks wore on this week, Carney's government faced some pushback from premiers of Canada's provinces back home.

Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew said the Canadian federal government should "fight" Trump.

A particular sticking point was a request from Carney to provincial premiers to lift their bans on American alcohol sales.

Quebec Premier Christine Frechette said Thursday that she was still "analyzing" the request, the CBC reported. Other premiers, such as Ontario's Doug Ford — who leads the country's most populous region — did not make any public remarks on Thursday or earlier Friday.

However, Ford wrote on X after Carney's announcement, "The prime minister has my full support for a strong response — tariff for tariff, dollar for dollar." Ford said Canada "needs to stand together more united than ever before."

"We didn't ask for this, but we'll keep fighting for as long as it takes," David Eby, the premier of British Columbia, said on X.

"No one benefits from a trade war," Alberta Premier Danielle Smith wrote on X. "Alberta will continue to advocate for a strong tariff free relationship between Canada and the U.S. and I will be urging the federal government to restart negotiations as soon as possible."

The prime minister had previously said Trump's threatened tariffs would amount to a "direct violation" of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which Trump had negotiated and signed during his first term.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce warned in a statement this week that "higher tariffs would damage both economies, drive up costs for U.S. families, further disrupt critical supply chains, and risk the 13 million American jobs that depend on" the North American trade pact.

After Carney's announcement on Friday, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce seemed to agree, calling it "a body blow to North American competitiveness in this self-defeating trade saga."

"Americans will see their costs go up, and Canadians will see customers, investment and small businesses disappear," said Candace Laing, the president and CEO of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce.

The new tariffs were imposed under Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which has never been deployed before.

The law allows the White House to implement duties of up to 50% on any foreign trade partner that "discriminates" against U.S. commerce.

Nonetheless, the new Canada tariffs are all but certain to be challenged in court.

Canadian officials had been hoping to convince the White House to drop the Section 338 tariffs entirely. In addition to that goal, they had also been looking for a lower tariff rate on industrial products such as steel and aluminum that were imposed under Section 232 of the Trade Act, CBC News and Bloomberg have reported.

On Wednesday, Bloomberg reported that American negotiators had agreed to lower the current tariffs on cars and metals from 25% to 15%.

In his statement early Saturday, Greer said that the U.S. had offered "significant tariff reductions on steel, aluminum, autos, and lumber," without providing specifics. "This is a missed opportunity for Canada to partner with the United States," he said.

Spokespeople for Canadian officials involved in the talks have repeatedly declined to provide additional details about the negotiations to NBC News.

But Greer previously said that the new 50% duties on Canada were effectively payback for Ottawa's retaliation against prior tranches of Trump's tariffs.

"The policy basis for those duties are related to measures that Canada took against the United States," Greer said last week. "So I've got two countries in the world that have retaliated against the United States for trade measures: the People's Republic of China and Canada. That's not the kind of company you really want to be running in."

Last year, Trump briefly responded to China's retaliation by raising tariffs into the triple digits. Talks between Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and China's vice premier over months eventually defused the tensions and tariffs were lowered.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1  Sean Treacy    3 months ago

Carney said in Friday's statement that Canada will immediately retaliate against the U.S., matching "those tariffs dollar for dollar to protect our workers and businesses."

Seems like carney and trump agree about what tariffs accomplish and that they hurt the country they are imposed on and not the country that puts them in place.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Sean Treacy @1    3 months ago

IMO tariffs imposed by a nation will bounce back to cause a tax on the people of the nation that imposed them..

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @1.1    3 months ago

I generally agree, but it appears Trump and Carney think otherwise. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @1.1    3 months ago
IMO tariffs imposed by a nation will bounce back to cause a tax on the people of the nation that imposed them.

You cannot impose taxes on foreign countries or businesses, you can only tax your own.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1.1.3  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.2    3 months ago

The word "tax" has more than one definition - an example being  "burden"..  

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1.1.4  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.1    3 months ago
"...Trump and Carney think otherwise."

There is a difference - Trump thinks  imposition while Carney thinks retaliation.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.5  Sean Treacy  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @1.1.4    3 months ago

Canadians are the ones hurt by carney’s  tariffs,  not Americans , if you believe what you wrote.  

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1.1.6  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.5    3 months ago

Of course, but at least the Canadian government cares about it because it becomes necessary to punish those whose aim is to hurt them.  

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
2  Buzz of the Orient    3 months ago

A long-winded repetition of what I've already posted.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
3  Buzz of the Orient    3 months ago

This is how the American negotiaters tried to screw Canada at the last minute of the negotiations, causing Canada to walk away from the table.

U.S.-Canada trade talks have collapsed. Carney says these 3 issues torpedoed them

While the Canadian delegation was more cautious in its assessment, Carney shared details of a potential deal with Canada’s premiers earlier in the week, asking them to start selling American alcohol again as part of the agreement.

But at the last minute, Carney recalled his negotiating team to Ottawa,  telling the nation he was “walking away from a bad deal.”

Here are the issues the prime minister said stalled progress on a deal that looked reachable in the not-too-distant past.
Auto tariffs

As part of his first round of tariffs levied on Canadian goods in 2025, Trump targeted the country’s auto sector with 25 per cent tariffs on vehicles assembled predominantly in Ontario.

The United States president repeatedly told reporters he wanted to see automakers leave Canada and bring their jobs south of the border.

In Ontario, where tens of thousands of direct and spinoff jobs are attached to the sector, unions and the provincial government have worried about keeping auto assembly in Canada.

As part of the abandoned deal with the United States, Carney said there had been progress on an approach to how to integrate autos that ultimately fell apart.

The prime minister said Saturday the two sides disagreed over “the treatment of Canadian content” in vehicles, while the United States was only willing to agree to a trade deal on cars and would not extend it to medium or heavy vehicles like trucks.

Excluding heavy vehicles from tariff relief, Carney said, would impact plants like Ford Motor in Oakville — which deals with F-series trucks — or General Motors’ Silverado truck in Oshawa.

“No rationale, just for exclusion,” he said. “So, effectively moving into a series of terms that would have made the production [of those vehicles] more uneconomic over time.”

Restrictions on Canadian trade deals

Carney also said the United States wanted to include terms in the deal that would put limits on the trade deals Canada was able to seek with other countries.

Since tariffs were first levied on Canadian goods, Ottawa has sought new trade deals with countries around the world, positioning itself as a key “middle power.”

Deals with Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates and talks with India are among the agreements Canada has recently reached, with 20 deals touted by the prime minister’s office.

“The U.S. introduced, in the last hours, efforts to restrict our ability to have other trade deals,” Carney said Saturday.

“We believe in free trade; we’re the partner of choice in many respects for countries around the world, and the Americans wanted to restrict that. They had language that they wanted to restrict. Unacceptable.”

Carney later added that there had also been discussion of the United States encouraging Canada to match its tariffs on other countries.

The prime minister said that, if Canada and the United States shared integrated markets on some goods, that approach could make sense. On steel, for example, he said he would see the “merit” of matching American tariffs on other countries if Canada and the U.S. were trading freely.

“If you do that though, you should have an integrated market,” Carney said.

“In other words, the tariff level that you apply from Canada into the United States — because America wants to tariff everybody on everything — but the tariff level you apply should be clearly the lowest. It shouldn’t be the same as other people. It should clearly be the lowest because you have this added market protection.”

Canadian culture, language rules

The third factor Carney said had derailed trade talks was disagreements over French language rules.

The prime minister offered few details of exactly where the two sides had disagreed but suggested it related, in particular, to French and said those rules would have amounted to a broader attack on Canada.

“[There were] efforts to restrict our protections of our language, our culture, and in effect, our sovereignty,” he said.

Later, speaking in French, he said there were “threats” from the United States in the deal over French language and Quebec culture.

Republicans have previously taken aim at Canada’s Online Streaming Act,  calling it “discriminatory” and suggesting it should result in additional tariffs .

The Online Streaming Act was passed in 2023 and would empower the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) to force large foreign platforms like Netflix and Amazon to pay a portion of their annual Canadian revenues into funds devoted to producing Canadian content.

U.S. streamers and the Motion Picture Association have filed court challenges against the Online Streaming Act, as well as the CRTC’s requirement that those companies disclose financial information in order to ensure the Canadian content funding obligations are met.

The Trump administration also identified the law as a trade irritant ahead of this summer’s scheduled review of CUSMA.

— with files from Global News’ Sean Boynton 

LINK ->

IMO just the American government being able to control which nations Canada is entitled to trade with is enough to tell Trump to stick his deal up his ass. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
4  Buzz of the Orient    3 months ago

You know, it absolutely amazes me that there are actually people, some of whom are members of this NT social news site, who STILL support Trump, a.man who has been capable of destroying the centuries long friendly cooperative brotherly mutually supportive and trusting allied relationship as neighbours sharing the longest mostly unguarded border in the world.  Even when that piece of shit is gone it will take years to set things back, but it will never again be what it was.

Another example of how unfair he is, notwithstanding the arrangement concerning the sharing of the tolls betwwn both sides of the Gordie Howe bridge, wherein the tolls first reimbuse Canada for what it cost to build the bridge, and Canada paid the whole cost of it, HE doesn't agree with that and demands that the tolls start being shared from day one.  What a fucking pig.

 
 

Who is online




68 visitors