╌>

Allen, TX Mass Shooter Posted Neo-Nazi Content, FBI Document Reveals - Rolling Stone

  
Via:  John Russell  •  3 years ago  •  53 comments

By:   Rolling Stone

Allen, TX Mass Shooter Posted Neo-Nazi Content, FBI Document Reveals - Rolling Stone
The FBI's "review and triage of the subject's social media accounts revealed hundreds of postings and images to include writings with racially or ethnically motivated violent extremist rhetoric, including neo-Nazi materials and material espousing the supremacy of the white race," the bulletin reads.

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


The shooting suspect was wearing a "right wing death squad" patch, according to documents obtained by Rolling Stone

By Jana Winter

The suspected mass shooter who killed at least eight people at an Allen, Texas mall on Saturday frequently posted pro-white supremacist and neo-Nazi materials on social media, according to an FBI bulletin reviewed by Rolling Stone.

The FBI's "review and triage of the subject's social media accounts revealed hundreds of postings and images to include writings with racially or ethnically motivated violent extremist rhetoric, including neo-Nazi materials and material espousing the supremacy of the white race," the bulletin reads.

The document also says the alleged shooter was discharged from the military in 2008 amid "mental health concerns." The Defense Department did not immediately return Rolling Stone's request for comment.

Investigators believe the shooter was a neo-Nazi and an "incel," according to an internal email circulated by Texas law enforcement.

On Saturday, a man, identified in law enforcement documents as 33-year-old Dallas resident Mauricio Garcia, opened fire at an Allen Premium Outlets. The suspected shooter was killed by police at the scene, where several of the victims were found deceased. Nine additional victims were later transported to the hospital. Another two victims later died at the hospital.

Garcia had no criminal history but is believed to have been associated with a local neo-Nazi group, according to the email. He previously reported a lost firearm to authorities, which police believe allowed him to then modify that same firearm in an attempt to make it harder to trace, according to the law enforcement documents reviewed by Rolling Stone. The suspect is a U.S. citizen who has never applied for a passport, the law enforcement documents also noted.


Garcia was armed with an AR-15-style rifle and a handgun, according to law enforcement emails. He was also wearing a tactical vest with an "RWDS" patch — a reference to "right wing death squad," which is a term used by white supremacists. He had 10 rifle magazines and six pistol magazines on his body. More handguns and rifles were found in his car, according to law enforcement emails.

The investigation into the shooter's motives is ongoing.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago
The FBI's "review and triage of the subject's social media accounts revealed hundreds of postings and images to include writings with racially or ethnically motivated violent extremist rhetoric, including neo-Nazi materials and material espousing the supremacy of the white race," the bulletin reads.

I guess Mexicans can be white supremacists after all. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @1    3 years ago

Being a white supremacist is just one of those jobs Americans won’t do. Have to outsource it.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
1.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1    3 years ago

Are you surprised that some Mexicans are white?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.2    3 years ago

Next pointless question gets deleted. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
1.2.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.1    3 years ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2  Bob Nelson    3 years ago

I must wonder about ammosexuals' fantasies. Do they imagine themselves rushing to put down a shooter?

Or do they imagine themselves as the shooter?

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
2.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Bob Nelson @2    3 years ago

Do you ever wonder about ammophobes?

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2.1.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @2.1    3 years ago

No. What's to wonder about?

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
3  Buzz of the Orient    3 years ago

Just taking note of America's unbeatable record of 199 or 200 mass shootings in 2023 to date - works out to be 11 mass shootings per week, helping to prove just how "EXCEPTIONAL" America is.  Saw a story on Crooks & Liars about a guy just sitting in his car minding his own business getting shot in the neck  I don't know how ANYONE can argue that they are safe from being shot in America.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @3    3 years ago

Statistically, individual people are safe. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
3.2.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2    3 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.2.2  Bob Nelson  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2    3 years ago

True. There's only one gun death per thousand Americans each year. 

Every year, a resident in America has a 99.9% chance of not dying of a gunshot.

Of course... that translates to a less than 10% chance of reaching the age of 68 (Americans' life expectancy) without dying of a gunshot wound. Probability is a bitch.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.2.3  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.2    3 years ago

There is also the question of what is the worth of being statistically safe when people express fear of being in public places. The American experience is degraded. People "know" it is unlikely they will be killed while shopping for school supplies for the kids, but will still be looking over their shoulder. It is a tragedy for this country. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.2.4  Bob Nelson  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.3    3 years ago

John... the kicker in my post is that a baby born in America today has a ninety percent chance of dying of a gunshot wound.

That means that it is perfectly rational to fear for one's life.

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
3.2.5  George  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.2    3 years ago
Of course... that translates to a less than 10% chance of reaching the age of 68 (Americans' life expectancy) without dying of a gunshot wound.

That may be the dumbest thing i have seen posted here ever, i would ask you to show your work, but you obviously can't

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
3.2.6  George  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.2    3 years ago
True. There's only one gun death per thousand Americans each year. 

Another outright lie. 

As of May 1, at least 13,959 people have died from gun violence in the U.S. this year, according to the Gun Violence Archive – which is an average of roughly 115 deaths each day More than 13,900 people killed in gun violence so far in 2023 - ABC News (go.com)

Not lets do the math for those who want the actual truth, instead of complete bullshit peddled by people with no integrity.

115 X 365 = 41,975 now 1 in a thousand would be 41975 X 1000 = 41,975,000 Since the population is 332,280,000 the odds are not 1 in a thousand. Some people just cant make a honest comment when it comes to guns.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.2.7  Bob Nelson  replied to  George @3.2.5    3 years ago

I used John's number, American population, American life-expectancy. It's simple math.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.2.8  Bob Nelson  replied to  George @3.2.6    3 years ago

Ummm... over thirty thousand gun deaths in America every year

Guns are now the most common cause of death for American children.

But hey! Let's party!

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
3.2.9  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.7    3 years ago

The National Safety Council says your chances of being killed in a gun assault is 1 in 208,

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.2.10  Sean Treacy  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.7    3 years ago
John's number, American population, American life-expectancy. It's simple math.

Lol.  That explains a lot. 

Use common sense if the math is too hard. Gun violence used to be higher, so you would expect that the percentage of people who died from gun violence would have been higher in recent years.

Ask yourself, if over 90% of the people you've known in your life who've died have died from gunshots? 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
3.2.11  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.8    3 years ago
Guns are now the most common cause of death for American children.

3.5 per 100,000 under the age of 18.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.2.12  Bob Nelson  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.2.9    3 years ago

Wow! That's even worse. Run the numbers 

Oh, and... I have consistently said "deaths by gunshot". I have not said "killed in a gun assault."

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.2.13  Bob Nelson  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.2.10    3 years ago

You need to learn probability. At no point have I said that.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
3.2.14  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.12    3 years ago
Run the numbers 

Run what numbers? 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3.2.15  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.2    3 years ago

I'm 68 so I must be lucky.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.2.16  Sean Treacy  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.13    3 years ago

that translates to a less than 10% chance of reaching the age of 68 (Americans' life expectancy) without dying of a gunshot wound

This is crazy on every level. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.2.17  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @3.2.15    3 years ago

he’s wrong on the simple fact of life expectancy, let alone basic understanding of numbers.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.2.18  Bob Nelson  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.2.11    3 years ago
Guns became the leading cause of death among children and teens in 2020 , killing more people ages 1 to 19 in the U.S. than vehicle crashes, drugs overdoses or cancer. More than 4,300 died of firearm-related injuries that year — a 29 percent increase from 2019 — according to a research letter published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine. 
 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3.2.19  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.4    3 years ago

Respectfully, I have to disagree as demographics play a large part in what you say. The percentage of one dying from a gunshot wound is significantly different in  metropolitan/urban areas as opposed to semi isolated rural areas.

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
3.2.20  George  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.7    3 years ago

So prove it. Show us Bob that you didn't lie, if you can.

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
3.2.21  George  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.2.10    3 years ago
Ask yourself, if over 90% of the people you've known in your life who've died have died from gunshots? 

Hard to argue with talking points and willful ignorance. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.2.22  Bob Nelson  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @3.2.19    3 years ago

They don't die? Their lives don't matter? 

WTF!

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.2.23  Bob Nelson  replied to  George @3.2.20    3 years ago

Do you imagine that I care what some ignorant fool thinks, or somewhat alternatively what you think?

Do the teeny-tiny bit of googling that is all you need... if knowing the facts is actually important to you.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
3.2.24  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.18    3 years ago

Yes, I know.  Interesting that they included 19 years old.

If you’re trying to assess the risk to your child or a child you know, you have to to dive deeper than national averages.  In 2020, child victims by race:

White 11%
Black 32%
Hispanic 8%
Native A 19%

You can get stats focused on their primary location as well.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3.2.25  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.22    3 years ago

Please tell me where I said that.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.2.26  Bob Nelson  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @3.2.25    3 years ago

I was just asking...😉

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3.2.27  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.26    3 years ago

Okay.

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
3.2.28  George  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.23    3 years ago

So the answer is no, you can't back up the ignorant bullshit comment, thanks for confirming. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.2.29  Bob Nelson  replied to  George @3.2.28    3 years ago

Not at all. I could lay out the proof, but since you have no intention of changing your mind, I won't waste my time.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
3.2.30  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.29    3 years ago

Thanks for sparing us all.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.2.32  Bob Nelson  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.2.30    3 years ago

I've decided that feeding pearls to swine is not useful.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.2.34  Bob Nelson  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.33    3 years ago

 jrSmiley_79_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
3.2.36  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.32    3 years ago
I've decided that feeding pearls to swine is not useful.

How long did you spend on that decision?  Have you always lived on a hog farm?

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3.2.37  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.2.36    3 years ago

Discretion being the better part of valor perhaps?

 
 

Who is online