╌>

Who Is It That Vivek Ramaswamy Thinks He Can Unite ?

  
By:  John Russell  •  3 years ago  •  59 comments


Who Is It That Vivek Ramaswamy Thinks He Can Unite ?
He told Chuck Todd this morning that if he becomes president he will bring Donald Trump on board as a mentor and advisor to the president. Is this his idea of "uniting"?

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


I have seen Vivek Ramaswamy on two shows this morning, and it is not exaggeration to say that he claimed he will "unite" the country at least 10 times. It is almost the main theme of his campaign.

My question is "what does "the nation" or "country" mean to this guy?

He has zero chance of uniting the country if we are talking about any people outside of MAGA. Maybe less than zero is there is such a thing. 

Am I missing something?

He said again today that he is running against Trump because it will take a "landslide" victory to unite the nation and he is the only one that can deliver a landslide. 

He told Chuck Todd this morning that if he becomes president he will bring Donald Trump on board as a mentor and advisor to the president. Is this his idea of "uniting"?

Obviously Ramaswamy is a total bullshit artist, but what I dont understand is why he thinks this "uniting" bilge is a way to win an election. 


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  author  JohnRussell    3 years ago

I know he's not going to win anything, but he will be annoying the hell out of everybody for the next six months. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1    3 years ago

That pretty much sums it up JR. He's a successful and bright guy with some good ideas, but wants to be a Trump mini-me, including being an annoying asshole. He'll get a few more moments of fame, but probably not six months.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
2  Thrawn 31    3 years ago

Apparently he thinks that Trump’s most hardcore base is actually the majority of the country and not the roughly 15% they actually make up? Or maybe he doesn’t consider outside of that base to be a legitimate part of the country, because he clearly has no interest in appealing to independents or democrats in any way shape or form.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3  Greg Jones    3 years ago

He's trying to channel Trump, but the people won't end up buying it. Winning the independents and some Dems is key.

Trump's 15% support, which is closer to reality than other estimates, means he has no chance to overcome his unpopularity with the majority of Americans and be able to win a national election. He's one and done.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
3.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  Greg Jones @3    3 years ago

He won in 2016 for two reasons, one the Dems just had to nominate the one candidate that could lose to Trump. I am convinced that had the nominated Sanders Trump would have lost. Trump was appealing the same 70000 voters that put Trump over the top except he isn’t nearly as big of an asshole and didn’t have nearly the same level of baggage as either Clinton or trump. 

Two, he was somehow able to convince enough people that his mannerism and actions were just campaign stuff and that he is actually totally different behind closed doors. He doesn’t have that now, eve try one knows it not an act, he is really that big of a douchebag. 

Trying to campaign on “I’ll be just like trump” isn’t going to win you anything, everyone’s kinds are already made up.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4  Hal A. Lujah    3 years ago

MAGA is highly unlikely to elect a President Ramaswamy based on the name and skin tone alone.  He is dreaming if he think Trump’s base is considering him a viable candidate.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.1  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4    3 years ago

How many brown people are in the democratic presidential race?

How many ran in 2020?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4.1.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  bugsy @4.1    3 years ago

I know, it’s so unusual when minorities run as Democrats.  jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.1.2  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.1    3 years ago

Apparently so....when you won't answer the question.

BTW...I didn't say minorities. I said brown people.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4.1.3  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  bugsy @4.1.2    3 years ago

Newsflash - brown people are minorities.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.1.4  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.3    3 years ago

Good for you. You understand definitions.

However, brown people are not the ONLY minorities.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
4.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4    3 years ago

How did Nikki Haley win the governorship twice in her racist, Southern state?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4.2.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.2    3 years ago

For all intents and purposes Nikki Haley looks, sounds, and is named like a white lady.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
4.2.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.2.2    3 years ago

In her announcement speech, she identified as “I was the proud daughter of Indian immigrants. Not Black, not white. I was different."

At campaign events she talks about her heritage  and being raised the only brown child in a Black and white world.

Obviously she isn't Brown enough for you. 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.2.4  JBB  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.2.3    3 years ago

Obviously?

original

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
4.2.5  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JBB @4.2.4    3 years ago

Lousy contrast in the meme.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4.2.6  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.2.3    3 years ago

I don’t care where her parents came from, she’s a Republican who also announced that she would vote for Trump if he’s the nominee.  She is therefore ineligible as a candidate for my vote, period.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4.2.8  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2.7    3 years ago

If they commit to voting for Trump if he’s the nominee then yes, absolutely.  It’s like admitting they are insane.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
4.2.9  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.2.6    3 years ago

Oh, your earlier point was Repubs wouldn't vote for some who had immigrant parents and wasn't white 4.0

Tim Scott probably isn't Black enough for you either.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4.2.10  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.2.3    3 years ago

Lol.  Why are you dragging me into this?  I’ve said why she is ineligible for my vote and it has nothing to do with how brown she is.  She actually sounded the most sane out of everyone at the debate, with the exception of the one disqualifying comment.  She didn’t need to go there but she did.  It shows an extreme weakness.  Maybe there’s some truth in what Michael Wolff had to say about her relationship with Trump.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4.2.11  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.2.9    3 years ago

Token Tim is a Republican with horrific policy ideas and is one of the many on stage making the ridiculous claim that Democrats push for abortion at the moment of birth.  He’s also another whack job who said he’d vote for Trump if he’s the nominee.  Fuck Tim Scott.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
4.2.12  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.2.10    3 years ago

Why are you dragging me into this?  I’ve said why she is ineligible for my vote and it has nothing to do with how brown she is.  

Your comment 4 said otherwise

She actually sounded the most sane out of everyone at the debate, with the exception of the one disqualifying comment.  

I thought that she won the debate.

She didn’t need to go there but she did.  It shows an extreme weakness.  

She knows that she can't win the primary otherwise.

It shows an extreme weakness.  

Like Biden in 2012 saying "They are going to put y'all back in chains" to a largely Black audience.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4.2.13  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.2.12    3 years ago

My comment 4 doesn’t involve me or my vote at all.  It’s simply an observation about MAGA.  There were two candidates who did not raise their hands when asked by the moderator if they were insane enough to vote for Donald Trump should he be the nominee.  Are you suggesting they drop out now since they doomed their chances?

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
4.2.14  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.2.13    3 years ago
My comment 4 doesn’t involve me or my vote at all.  It’s simply an observation about MAGA.  

Yea, I got that and I offered a couple of differing  observations.

There were two candidates who did not raise their hands when asked by the moderator if they were insane enough to vote for Donald Trump should he be the nominee.  Are you suggesting they drop out now since they doomed their chances?

No, neither are in the race to win but to try to persuade the Party to dump Trump.  I want them to continue.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
4.2.15  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.2.11    3 years ago
Token Tim...Fuck Tim Scott.

Just another Uncle Tom.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.2.16  bugsy  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.2.3    3 years ago
Obviously she isn't Brown enough for you. 

If she were half black, half white and had a mentor that was known for their bombing of federal buildings, and vowed to fundamentally transform the country, she would be brown enough for the left.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.2.17  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.2.11    3 years ago
Token Tim

Typical racist comment by the left.

Got any more?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4.2.18  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  bugsy @4.2.17    3 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.2.19  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.2.18    3 years ago

Makes no sense, but OK....whatever you say....

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
4.2.20  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  bugsy @4.2.16    3 years ago

It would also help if she had a racist preacher, that asked God to damn America.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.2.21  bugsy  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.2.20    3 years ago

Now THAT would put her over the top.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4.2.22  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  bugsy @4.2.19    3 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4.2.23  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  bugsy @4.2.16    3 years ago

We can discuss if’s for anyone sane enough to not say they will support a twice impeached four time indicted racist ignoramus serial pathological liar for President of the United States.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.2.24  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.2.23    3 years ago

I don't think Biden has been impeached twice yet, but, hey.....anything can happen.

All it takes, apparently, is an anonymous "whistleblower".

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.2.25  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.2.22    3 years ago
Let’s go with Fugsly then

Still stupid....and childish

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.2.26  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.2.23    3 years ago

Still not gonna answer the original question, huh?

Not surprised.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4.2.27  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  bugsy @4.2.26    3 years ago

Castro, Booker, Harris, Yang, Patrick, Gabbard - all minorities, all 2020 Democrat candidates.  That’s five out of 18.  Why would you ask such a stupid question?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4.2.28  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.2.27    3 years ago

Correction, it’s six out of 18.  

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
5  Gsquared    3 years ago
Who Is It That Vivek Ramaswamy Thinks He Can Unite ?

The same group as before.

800

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Gsquared @5    3 years ago

"Heil Ramaswamy" doesnt have the same ring to it though that "Heil Trump" does. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
5.1.2  Gsquared  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1    3 years ago

There was this gathering of Nazi Trump supporters.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.3  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.1    3 years ago

You do know that neo Nazis said "Hail Trump" after he won in 2016 dont you? 

Maybe  you dont. You should probably read something besides Fox News.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.4  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Gsquared @5.1.2    3 years ago

Bingo. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
5.1.5  Gsquared  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.4    3 years ago

There are some right wings propagandists who pretend that these people don't exist and go around denouncing people who tell the truth about them.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
5.1.7  Gsquared  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.4    3 years ago

And, of course, we are all aware that the Republican Supreme Leader Donald Trump hosted a neo-Nazi and vicious anti-Semite at Berchtesgaden, I mean Mar-a-Lago, as recently as November 22, 2022.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.8  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.6    3 years ago
Sorry, I just know how ignorant it is to try to link Nazis and the GOP.

Sorry, Trump was a Republican in 2016, in fact he was the leader of the Republican Party just like he is today. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
5.1.10  Gsquared  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.8    3 years ago

Trump hosted a meeting at his home with neo-Nazis and Hitler supporters less than a year ago.  See my comment above.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.12  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.9    3 years ago

We have a neo Nazi saying Hail Trump and Trump is a Republican.

What on earth are you talking about? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.14  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.11    3 years ago
If you read half of what I do, you probably wouldn't make half your posts.

I probably read 5 times as much as you do. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.15  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.13    3 years ago

By the way, we're done. Stop now or be deleted. You have said what you wanted to say. 

 
 
 
freepress
Freshman Silent
6  freepress    3 years ago

This guy is just another cookie cutter fake "rebel" that the Republican party trots out to pander to their base voters. Sarah Palin was one, Trump was one, and a host of other wanna be losers who have been attempting the trick of showcasing themselves as a "rebel" in order to hope beyond all hope that they will "win". Trump managed to break through, but only because he blinded the base with his global wealth and showmanship knowing full well he is everything they hate. Also knowing if he repeatedly managed running his P.T. Barnum style snake oil method of rallies and campaigning they would fall for it and they did.

 
 

Who is online






110 visitors