Woman at Trump rally yesterday: “Trump works for God. And God is all about America. And God is the one that’s gonna save America. He’s using Trump as one of his tools. That’s why we support Trump, because he works for God.”
Ok, I've rethought it. You're right about news reporting typical things and wrong that this is an example of a typical extreme MAGA.
Trump is a populist, he appeals to the widespread dissatisfaction with national conditions and a government that doesn't acknowledge or respect their concerns. Many Trump supporters will acknowledge Trump's bad behavior and lousy character, but disregard that because they believe that he is fighter. They think that non-presidential behavior and spiting the the conventional rules is ok since it was those rules that got us here.
They think that non-presidential behavior and spiting the the conventional rules is ok since it was those rules that got us here.
It is not the rules that brought the country to its present state. Most of the blame can be laid at the feet of the Two-Party system and the control exerted over elections, specifically looking at traction issues and the amount that the two parties have amplified them in an effort to distinguish themselves from each other. Add to this the corrosive affects of gerrymandering, and you get a non-responsive government that tells the voter what is important.
No one other than an ignorant person would say they intend to vote for a traitor. Does that mean that 40% of Americans are ignorant? That remains to be seen.
Let's say irrefutable proof comes out the Biden took bribes from our adversaries (there really already is, but I am being nice) to manipulate US foreign policy..
Let's say irrefutable proof comes out the Biden took bribes from our adversaries (there really already is, but I am being nice) to manipulate US foreign policy.
If there is irrefutable proof that Biden took bribes from our adversaries that manipulated national policy, would you admit that you voted for a traitor?
I think it is blind partisanship that would cause someone to claim "irrefutable proof" already exists.
Deliver this proof. You cannot. Ergo, your comment is bullshit. Do better.
If there is irrefutable proof that Biden took bribes from our adversaries that manipulated national policy, would you admit that you voted for a traitor?
If it is determined (e.g. in a court of law) that Biden took bribes from enemies and in turn manipulated national policy, that would be treason and he would be a traitor.
Did you really expect me to answer differently? Are you truly that clueless about my positions?
The Republicans in the US Senate have looked for years and found no zero zip nada evidence that Joe Biden has ever received an unreported dollar. Joe and Jill Biden's taxes are public going back decades. If there was any evidence Joe Biden ever personally profited from any illicit activity or received unreported income it would be his undoing. Yet, there is none. Never has been. Never will be. We are, after all, talking Joe Biden the thirty year US Senator, two full term Vice President and current President of the United States of America. Imperfect though he may be, Joe Biden is a decent honorable man very unlike his opponent...
There have always been Republicans in the Senate looking for it and in over forty years they never found anything, zip nada zero evidence of wrongdoing by Biden...
Quit squawking and making unfounded accusations and show us the proof! Your hypotheticals about how people might feel if the saw any are MAGA wetdreams!
There have always been Republicans in the Senate looking for it and in over forty years they never found anything, zip nada zero evidence of wrongdoing by Biden...
So here is your chance.
Over the past 40 years, as YOU say, who are the Senators that looked into Biden, when did they do it and what was it they were waiting for.
You would surely have to overlook many things to assume that Biden didn't benefit from his son's 'business' dealings.
Apparently you do not understand the meaning of the term "irrefutable proof".
Don't dishonestly soften the claim:
bugsy@4.1.1 ☞ Let's say irrefutable proof comes out the Biden took bribes from our adversaries (there really already is, but I am being nice) to manipulate US foreign policy.
Show the irrefutable proof that Biden took bribes from our adversaries in return for manipulating US foreign policy.
You cannot do so. Instead you dramatically soften bugsy's claim to mere circumstantial evidence and then deflect to the handling of Trump.
A claim I never made, but it sure is nice you want to pretend.
Now we see the faux obtuseness tactic. ⇡
I stated this was bugsy's claim. Here you are pretending that you did not see that.
If you want to step up to the plate and defend bugsy's claim then stand tall and do so. Failing in the attempt and then equivocating by saying this is not actually your claim is feeble.
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Typical extreme MAGA.
Who thinks there will be "compromise" with these people?
If it was typical, it wouldn’t be news and you wouldn’t have seeded it.
You really should rethink the ridiculousness of that comment. There are items in the news every hour of every day that are "typical".
Ok, I've rethought it. You're right about news reporting typical things and wrong that this is an example of a typical extreme MAGA.
Trump is a populist, he appeals to the widespread dissatisfaction with national conditions and a government that doesn't acknowledge or respect their concerns. Many Trump supporters will acknowledge Trump's bad behavior and lousy character, but disregard that because they believe that he is fighter. They think that non-presidential behavior and spiting the the conventional rules is ok since it was those rules that got us here.
It is not the rules that brought the country to its present state. Most of the blame can be laid at the feet of the Two-Party system and the control exerted over elections, specifically looking at traction issues and the amount that the two parties have amplified them in an effort to distinguish themselves from each other. Add to this the corrosive affects of gerrymandering, and you get a non-responsive government that tells the voter what is important.
From the post:
“He’s using Trump as one of his tools.”
Apparently god knows a ‘tool’ when ‘he’ sees one.
For supposedly being omnipotent, God sure seems to be weak and powerless to keep Trump out of trouble. Or anyone else for that matter.
This seed is about the Ramblings of a single random person.
Real important stuff.
lol.
This is Trump's base.
No one other than an ignorant person would say they intend to vote for a traitor. Does that mean that 40% of Americans are ignorant? That remains to be seen.
Let's say irrefutable proof comes out the Biden took bribes from our adversaries (there really already is, but I am being nice) to manipulate US foreign policy..
Would you admit that you voted for a traitor?
Deliver this irrefutable proof.
Only blind partisanship does not see it.
I'll ask you and see if you will answer it.
If there is irrefutable proof that Biden took bribes from our adversaries that manipulated national policy, would you admit that you voted for a traitor?
I think it is blind partisanship that would cause someone to claim "irrefutable proof" already exists.
Deliver this proof. You cannot. Ergo, your comment is bullshit. Do better.
If it is determined (e.g. in a court of law) that Biden took bribes from enemies and in turn manipulated national policy, that would be treason and he would be a traitor.
Did you really expect me to answer differently? Are you truly that clueless about my positions?
Deliver the “irrefutable evidence” claimed by bugsy or admit it does not exist.
The Republicans in the US Senate have looked for years and found no zero zip nada evidence that Joe Biden has ever received an unreported dollar. Joe and Jill Biden's taxes are public going back decades. If there was any evidence Joe Biden ever personally profited from any illicit activity or received unreported income it would be his undoing. Yet, there is none. Never has been. Never will be. We are, after all, talking Joe Biden the thirty year US Senator, two full term Vice President and current President of the United States of America. Imperfect though he may be, Joe Biden is a decent honorable man very unlike his opponent...
This is why he is so hated by the MAGA mob!
The perfect cover for corruption. Unfortunately for him, it is all unraveling before our eyes....well...the eyes that pay attention.
The statute on corruption clearly states that a politicians family can benefit from a politician's actions. This is what Joe did.
Funny how some never wants to point out the line item on the 1099 that says "bribes paid to you by the country's adversaries".
Not sure what these "years" are you are talking about.
Republicans have had control of the House for 10 months. Not sure about leftist time frames, but 10 months is less than a year.
Not gonna answer my question, are ya?
Then stop telling everyone else to answer your trolling questions over and over again.
Here is other questions for you.
Did Hunter Biden use Joe's name to enrich himself?
Did Joe speak to Hunter's foreign contacts, probably about his business?
If you answer honestly, that would be a yes to both.
According to the US statute that speaks of political corruption, enriching your family through your actions is a corruption charge.
Only blind partisans refuse to see the corruption.
No lectures.
There have always been Republicans in the Senate looking for it and in over forty years they never found anything, zip nada zero evidence of wrongdoing by Biden...
Quit squawking and making unfounded accusations and show us the proof! Your hypotheticals about how people might feel if the saw any are MAGA wetdreams!
So here is your chance.
Over the past 40 years, as YOU say, who are the Senators that looked into Biden, when did they do it and what was it they were waiting for.
I'll be awaiting your silence
Apparently you do not understand the meaning of the term "irrefutable proof".
Don't dishonestly soften the claim:
Show the irrefutable proof that Biden took bribes from our adversaries in return for manipulating US foreign policy.
You cannot do so. Instead you dramatically soften bugsy's claim to mere circumstantial evidence and then deflect to the handling of Trump.
Pathetic.
No, I am not going to play your game of deflection with more questions.
You made a claim, I challenged you to deliver your declared proof.
You cannot do so. We all see it. Your claim is bullshit.
I (and likely everyone else) can see that @4.1.5 fails to deliver the "irrefutable proof".
If you understand what "irrefutable proof" means then deliver it.
Your circumstantial evidence does not come even remotely close to proof, much less irrefutable proof.
Now we see the faux obtuseness tactic. ⇡
I stated this was bugsy's claim. Here you are pretending that you did not see that.
If you want to step up to the plate and defend bugsy's claim then stand tall and do so. Failing in the attempt and then equivocating by saying this is not actually your claim is feeble.
Why are you not answering my questions?
You demand it of everyone else. Why not hold yourself to your own standards?
OK. I'll tell you what.
I'll admit There is not irrefutable evidence.....yet.
Now, how about answering my questions in 4.1.3 and 4.1.18
[Deleted]
Part of the above thread was removed for no value.
LOCKED BECAUSE OF CONSTANT NONSENSE.