╌>

Netanyahu Buckled Under Public Pressure to Accept the Same Deal He Already Rejected - Israel News - Haaretz.com

  
Via:  John Russell  •  3 years ago  •  48 comments

By:   Yossi Verter (Haaretz. com)

Netanyahu Buckled Under Public Pressure to Accept the Same Deal He Already Rejected - Israel News - Haaretz.com
The "elimination" of Hamas and the "dismantling of its military and governmental capabilities" can be accomplished later, including killing its leaders. There is time for that. What was not done over the past 20 years can wait. But the abductees - certainly the children, the sick, the elderly and the injured - have no time. And no one at the top has the moral authority to decide to leave them there in order to advance another kilometer to the south of the Gaza Strip.

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Netanyahu buckled under public pressure to accept the same deal he already rejected


Yossi Verter 5-6 minutes   11/21/2023





Without a doubt, a four-day cease-fire, including a suspension of drone surveillance of what is happening in Gaza, will not help the war effort. There is a real fear that Hamas will emerge from this truce stronger, emboldened and reorganized, which will come at the cost of soldiers’ lives exposed now to greater dangers. It is almost certain that on the final day as well, difficulties, mishaps and incidents will occur, as will hostages who "can't be found." What can go wrong probably will.

But there is no choice except to approve the deal on offer. There are   236 hostages , ranging from 10 months old to 85 years old, who are trapped in Gaza — not because they took the wrong turn on a holiday trip. They became hostages because of a colossal failure on the part of the government, the Israel Defense Forces and the Shin Bet security service, a failure that cost the lives of 1,400 people and hundreds of injured, some of them destined to be disabled for the rest of their lives.


The   chief responsibility of Israel’s political   and defense leadership is to bring home all the abductees. Because that is not possible right now, at least the 50 or so children and mothers should be rescued. After them, women, the elderly and the injured That goal should get priority over all others.

The   "elimination" of Hamas   and the "dismantling of its military and governmental capabilities" can be accomplished later, including killing its leaders. There is time for that. What was not done over the past 20 years can wait. But the abductees - certainly the children, the sick, the elderly and the injured - have no time. And no one at the top has the moral authority to decide to leave them there in order to advance another kilometer to the south of the Gaza Strip.


For all those not included in these categories, it will be difficult, if not tortuous. With the freeing of the first 50 (perhaps 70) of the hostages, the hostage families will be divided between those whose loved ones have come home and are enjoying infinite happiness and those whose loved ones have been left behind. Their grief will be the worst for it, another insufferable blow.

Israel is now manic-depressive. The good news will be mixed with the bad. Joy will be mingled with sadness. Still, that is better than the unmitigated depression we have been living in for the last 46 days. We have never experienced such an emotional roller coaster. It will be the release of Gilad Shalit many times over.

The decision of the two coalition parties of the far right – Religious Zionism and Otzma Yehudit – to oppose the deal comes as no surprise. From the right that they represent, human life, even that of 40 children, is considered less important than making war, razing homes and killing terrorists. That is their “Zionism.” That is their “Judaism.”

A thought creeps into my heart: Would   Ben-Gvir and Smotrich   have taken a different stance, if people from other sectors of the population – and not kibbutzniks, for example – had been abducted? We saw this opacity and evil live in a Knesset committee discussion. Their opposition is Act II of this cruel performance.

As far as we know, the deal that the cabinet debated Tuesday night was also on the table a week ago, with negligible differences. The prime minister hesitated until he rejected it. This week, he changed his mind. Netanyahu's zigzags are par for the course. What seems to have changed his mind is public pressure, his meeting with the hostage families and the positions taken by the IDF, the Shin Bet and the Mossad. The ultimate responsibility is his, but it is always more comfortable to share it with the defense establishment.



It is not the first time during this war that Netanyahu has changed his public stance. At one time, he did not put freeing the hostages at the top of the war's goals. As the pressure increased, he moved more and more to a   humanitarian stance   until his public remarks gave equal priority to the release of the abductees and the elimination of Hamas.

Now, we can only hope that the care given to the returning mothers and children will be more humane, more professional and more compassionate than the treatment their families received over the past six weeks. That includes Tuesday, when many of those invited to a meeting with the war cabinet were left outside in the rain due to poor organization. Sloppy work is not an option.



Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago
The  "elimination" of Hamas  and the "dismantling of its military and governmental capabilities" can be accomplished later, including killing its leaders. There is time for that. What was not done over the past 20 years can wait. But the abductees - certainly the children, the sick, the elderly and the injured - have no time. And no one at the top has the moral authority to decide to leave them there in order to advance another kilometer to the south of the Gaza Strip.
 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @1    3 years ago

This what I have been saying since the beginning. Maybe now that an Israeli columnist says it , it will get a better reception here. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
1.1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1    3 years ago

3 Palestinians equal 1 Israeli, seems like they got the math right.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1.1.2  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1.1    3 years ago

No it isn't.  Previously it was 100 to 1,  100 convicted terrorist murderers together are not worth the lives of one innocent Israeli.  

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
1.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1    3 years ago

Biden should have sent the Rev. Jesse Jackson.  He probably could have gotten a better deal for the [Deleted]

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
1.2.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.2    3 years ago

His term not mine.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Participates
1.3  GregTx  replied to  JohnRussell @1    3 years ago

Abductees?... mmmmkay 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
1.3.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  GregTx @1.3    3 years ago

Abductees sounds much softer than kidnapped hostages.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Participates
1.3.3  GregTx  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.3.1    3 years ago

And ever so much softer than torture victims...

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
3  Kavika     3 years ago

So it seems that between 50 and 70 hostages will not be collateral damage. If you watched the video of the meeting at the Knesset a few days ago with the hostage's families it was obvious that tempers were at a boiling point when finally one family member told the right-wing minister that it was time to stop talking about killing Arabs and talk about savings Jews.

I believe that probably put enough pressure on Netanyahu to make this deal.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
3.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Kavika @3    3 years ago

Good point.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Kavika @3    3 years ago

Get as many hostages out now, then resume rooting out the Hamas killers. The temporary ceasefire will determine if Hamas will live up to their end of the deal. Any dead hostages going forward will entirely be Hamas' fault.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
3.2.1  Kavika   replied to  Greg Jones @3.2    3 years ago
Any dead hostages going forward will entirely be Hamas' fault.

The deal has been made and 50 hostages are supposed to be released in the next four or five days. That will determine the Israeli reaction. 

If there are any dead hostages going forward try explaining to the families that it is Hamas's fault. I doubt if the families give a crap about it being Hamas's fault. Sounds good in the hypothetical not so good when you have to face the families and tell them that their relatives are dead.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago
Israel's hostage deal makes the best of an impossible situation 

In a conflict marked by moral absolutism, today’s hostage deal is a triumph of difficult compromise.

As the possibility of an  agreement  emerged, Israel’s leaders faced a dilemma: Israel could end the nightmare of at least some of the  240 hostages being held by Hamas , but only by negotiating with terrorists and freeing convicted criminals who may well harm Israelis in the future.

By all rights and laws of war, at least all of the civilian hostages (roughly half of those detained) should have been released immediately. Whatever war crimes Israel may be accused of, the war crimes Hamas committed on Oct. 7 are beyond dispute. 

The hostage deal requires Israeli leaders to compromise on several core moral and political imperatives: Don’t negotiate with terrorists. Don’t settle for an imperfect agreement. Don’t give Hamas what it wants. And don’t allow violent criminals to go free.

But painful compromise is exactly what leaders have to do sometimes.  

It’s easy for those of us on the sidelines (or on the political extremes, like Israel’s rejectionist hardliners) to chant slogans and state absolute truths. “ Cease-fire now ,” the left shouts.  “Stop the slaughter .” “Destroy Hamas,” says the right. “ Don’t give in .” 

But reality is dictated by power and circumstance as much as by principle, and wisdom often bends principle toward mercy.

That was the choice that Israel’s war cabinet made today (apparently with significant U.S. intervention), choosing to save the lives of an estimated 50 people who have endured six weeks of living hell.

As a parent, the agony and trauma those kids’ families have experienced is absolutely incomprehensible. As much as there may be a moral imperative not to negotiate with terrorists, so too Judaism has its own moral imperative to rescue captives —  pidyon shvuyim  — which, in traditional Jewish law at least, trumps almost all other moral considerations.

Halachic rules don’t (and shouldn’t) dictate Israel’s political decisions. But the Jewish values behind them surely play a role.

It may be argued that Hamas has won this round. Thanks to its despicable acts of terrorism, and its callous use of thousands of Palestinians as human shields, it has won the release of 150 prisoners and a temporary reprieve from the fighting.

Their original acts of terror won them even more: The world’s attention has returned to the plight of the Palestinians, which Israel would prefer to be ignored. The subsequent war has turned many nations against Israel, igniting a new round of antisemitism around the world. And the scale of violence has made the cause of peace seem even more preposterous, which is exactly what Hamas and the Israeli right both want.

The war is not over, and Hamas’ leaders may yet lose their lives. But their murderous and barbaric rampage has paid off handsomely.

But Israel, too, can claim a partial victory.

Securing the release of hostages is a much-needed political win for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, of course. But it also represents at least some reprieve from the horrors of the past six weeks.

For a nation weary, tired, scared and traumatized, this is at least a sliver of good news. And of course, for the families of those taken captive, it is an unimaginable relief. Thank God for that.

It also is a strategic victory. Instead of giving into calls for an unconditional and unreciprocated cease-fire (which, while Hamas is holding civilians hostage, is hardly worthy of the name), Israel made the cease-fire part of the negotiations. Israel did not give away something for nothing. That too is a validation of its leaders’ stoicism and strategy.

In principle, it is horrible to turn innocent people into pawns of war. Humanitarian aid should not be a point of leverage. But this is the chess game, dictated by violence and power, that Hamas initiated on Oct. 7.  When faced with an opponent like this, to choose  only  mercy is to ensure defeat.

So what happens next?

A brief, merciful pause in fighting provides no reason to think that either side has suddenly committed to nonviolence. Surely both Hamas and the Israeli military will use this “humanitarian” pause to regroup and rearm; I only hope the cease-fire holds long enough for all of the 50-or-so hostages to be released in the coming days, before one side or the other does something to restart the cycle of violence.

Still, in the meantime, even though most Israelis don’t celebrate Thanksgiving, there is finally some cause for giving thanks. The price was dear, and impossible to balance on some moral or strategic ledger. But that is not how the most difficult moral choices actually play out in our political or private lives. We face the circumstances before us, and make the best choice of the options available.

And then, whether we are believers or not, we can partner with God and say, in the words of one of Judaism’s daily blessings, Blessed are You, Source of life, who redeems the captives.
 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
4.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @4    3 years ago
The price was dear, and impossible to balance on some moral or strategic ledger. But that is not how the most difficult moral choices actually play out in our political or private lives. We face the circumstances before us, and make the best choice of the options available.

Wise words.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Participates
5  GregTx    3 years ago

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
6  Right Down the Center    3 years ago

"Netanyahu Buckled Under Public Pressure To Accept The Same Deal He Already Rejected"

I have to wonder how true this is.  The pressure has been there from the start and has mostly been ignored by Israel and to a certain extent the US (at least in Public).  I wonder if Netanyahu figured he has done enough damage that stopping for 4 or 5 days in order to get humanitarian aid in and hostages out can be done now because he feels it will take alot longer than that for Hamas to regroup and/or hide/dig in.  I wonder if Hamas didn't overplay its hand with the brutality of the attack and just assumed Israel would go with a measured response and now they are back on their heals.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
6.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Right Down the Center @6    3 years ago

You could be right that Hamas did not anticipate the intensity of the response but my concern now is that Hamas will have lots of time to regroup, rearm and set up many booby traps in its tunnels that will kill a lot more Israeli soldiers than before.  Although the defeat of Hamas is inevitable the war would end and not one more person would die or be wounded if Hamas were to surrender and turn over its weapons but there is no way Hamas will stop because the expected future for them if they die martyrs is to get the opportunity to deflower their 72 virgins, which is much more important to them than the lives of the civilian Gazans they should be protecting rather than using them as human shields.. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
6.1.2  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.1    3 years ago

Unfortunately, not just "some".

 
 

Who is online





shona1


101 visitors