╌>

Is Anyone Watching The Fani Willis Testimony ?

  
By:  John Russell  •  2 years ago  •  95 comments


Is Anyone Watching The Fani Willis Testimony ?
 

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


This is a train wreck of biblical proportions. 

But on whose part ?


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  author  JohnRussell    2 years ago

Trump's lawyers are allowed to grill this woman about things that have nothing to do with Trump trying to rig the 2020 election. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1    2 years ago

Trump's lawyers are allowed to grill this woman about things that have nothing to do with Trump trying to rig the 2020 election. 

Probably because this is a disqualification hearing not a Trump trial.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1    2 years ago

no shit ?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.2  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1    2 years ago

Trying to get her disqualified over things that have nothing to do with the case demonstrates a consciousness of guilt on Trump's part. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1.3  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.2    2 years ago

Explain your reasoning on this.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
1.1.4  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.2    2 years ago

No trying to get her and her lover disqualified may give a future jury pause.  His lawyers would be remiss to not pursue this.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.5  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1.4    2 years ago

Guilty people will do anything. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
1.1.6  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.5    2 years ago

Defendants, guilty or not, will do what they can afford.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
1.2  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @1    2 years ago
Trump's lawyers are allowed to grill this woman about things that have nothing to do with Trump trying to rig the 2020 election.

Are you sure you are watching it if that what you think this is about?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.2    2 years ago

are you watching it? 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
1.2.2  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.1    2 years ago

No but it has nothing to do with Trump. Listening to radio reports. Sorry to disappoint. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.3  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.2.2    2 years ago

How does trying to disqualify her from a case where Trump is a defendant have "nothing to do with Trump" ? 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
1.2.4  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.3    2 years ago

How about because the trial will go on with or without her at the helm. So the case against Trump is moot.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.5  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.2.4    2 years ago
How about because the trial will go on with or without her at the helm.

If Trump's defense thought that they wouldn't be bothering. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
1.2.6  MrFrost  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.2.2    2 years ago
No but it has nothing to do with Trump.

Exactly, so why would it disqualify her?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
1.2.7  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.5    2 years ago

She is another just like in NY. She has a predetermined outcome in her mind. And it WILL go on. They will just find another DA possibly in a different jurisdiction and venue.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
1.2.8  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  MrFrost @1.2.6    2 years ago

Perhaps it has to do with Wade going to the White House twice to talk with the Biden administration after which I believe the indictment was issued. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.9  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.2.7    2 years ago
She has a predetermined outcome in her mind.

No kidding ?  She's the prosecutor. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
1.2.10  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.9    2 years ago
She's the prosecutor. 

No, she hired her lover to be the prosecutor.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  author  JohnRussell    2 years ago

Willis has called Trump's lawyer Ashleigh Merchant a liar at least a dozen times from the witness stand. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @2    2 years ago
Willis has called Trump's lawyer Ashleigh Merchant a liar

128gkv.jpg

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Right Down the Center @2.1    2 years ago

Are you watching?  

I'm not interested in ignorant memes. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1.2  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.1    2 years ago

I don't waste my time watching crap like this. Why do you?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2.1.3  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.1    2 years ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
2.1.4  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1.2    2 years ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.2  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @2    2 years ago

And the judge being a POS is allowing it.

Willis is a criminal, period. 

Seems that leftists don't care if anyone with a D behind their name commits a crime.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Ronin2 @2.2    2 years ago

your comments never disappoint

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
3  Just Jim NC TttH    2 years ago

Thing that kills me about this, she was watching the trial, got to hear the testimony up to the point she decided she had better go down and set the record straight. Isn't that some form of tainted testimony?

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
3.1  Jasper2529  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3    2 years ago

Yes, it is. She's come across as arrogant and hostile. Not a good look!

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
3.1.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Jasper2529 @3.1    2 years ago
She's come across as arrogant and hostile.

Reminds me of that mayor of a small town in Illinois when challenged on her spending.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
3.1.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.2    2 years ago

Do you think that the judge held this disqualification hearing because he felt she was “uppity”?

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
3.1.4  Sunshine  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.2    2 years ago

An educated black woman would demonstrate proper conduct for a court hearing and not need a judge to reprimand her during her testimony.  

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
3.1.5  CB  replied to  Sunshine @3.1.4    2 years ago

I would have stated she, as a DA, should comport herself differently; but, then its Trump's lawyers trying to perform for an audience of one! She did well to speak up for herself and to show grit.

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
3.1.6  Sunshine  replied to  CB @3.1.5    2 years ago

Glad you agree her conduct was unprofessional.  A courtroom is not her personal platform to rant.  It belongs to the people, and has rules to abide by to keep it that way.  Unbelievable a judge had to reprimand a sitting DA.  Hate to think what she acts like in private. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
3.1.7  CB  replied to  Sunshine @3.1.6    2 years ago

There is a judge in the court who corrected as needed. There is no need for you to keep this alive by trying to diminish Ms. and remark on her not being "an educated woman" as you put it at 3.1.4 — it shows your bias. 

And it is not "unbelievable" that a D. A. is corrected by a judge, because every official at one time or another in a court setting is corrected by its judge on matters of law and disposition. 

Ms. Willis was 'hot' over how she was being misrepresented by the defense lawyers (I did not catch the earlier testimony that upset her), and so she came in 'strong' and many admire that about her. But, two things can be possible at the same time. When/where she calmed down (a bit) it was fine. Her display of grit was fine too as she was not charge with contempt by the judge.

And though some may not like displays of aggressiveness by women, it is fine when it is 'essential' and when it serves to get the point across!

Also, as a professional it is possible Ms. Willis understands the nature of what was transpiring in the 'moment' in the questioning and wanted to set the record straight with no nonsense (without question).

(Women should appreciate other women standing up for themselves.)

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
3.1.10  Split Personality  replied to  Sunshine @3.1.4    2 years ago

You must have an extremely low opinion of Alina Saad Babba then.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
4  Drinker of the Wry    2 years ago

Robin Bryant-Yeartie, who knew Willis since college and worked in the DA's office, testified that Willis began dating Wade in 2019. Willis strongly denied that.

“It’s highly offensive when someone lies on you,” Willis said.

Willis said Yeartie is no longer her friend.

“I think she betrayed our friendship,” Willis said.

Maybe Robin is MAGA!

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
5  Drinker of the Wry    2 years ago

Wade testified that Willis shared the expenses by reimbursing him with cash, but that he didn’t have any records of it.

“It was cash,” Wade said. “She didn’t give me any checks.”

Willis is old fashioned that way, just peeling off the Benjamins from her hundie roll.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6  Sean Treacy    2 years ago

What an embarrassment to the legal profession. She’s a female trump,  

she’s  perjured herself, tells asinine  lies and generally acts like a spoiled four year old.  Laying waste to the integrity of the court every time she opens her mouth.

but she hates trump, so trump like, progressives will say the ends justify the means and it doesn’t matter how much damage she does or crimes she commits,

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @6    2 years ago

maybe they should be in a cage match

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @6.1    2 years ago

Who said it, trump or fani,

you oppose me, you oppose democracy?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.1.2  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @6.1.1    2 years ago

If Willis is such a bad lawyer Trump should be glad she is trying his case. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.1.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @6.1.2    2 years ago

Trump should be very worried that he’s on trial in a jurisdiction with jurors who voted for this idiot.  What an absolute embarrassment for the county and its residents to have her as the head of law enforcement. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.1.4  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @6.1.3    2 years ago

trump embarrasses 320 million people every day of his existence

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
6.1.5  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @6.1.2    2 years ago

She isn’t trying this case, her lover is if the judge allows it.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7  author  JohnRussell    2 years ago

digby
@digby56
·
23m
Why do I get the feeling that the only televised courtroom procedure having to do with the attempt to overturn democracy in 2020 is going to end up being the one about the DA on the case having a consensual affair with her co-worker?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @7    2 years ago

Can’t make this up

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
7.1.1  Ronin2  replied to  Sean Treacy @7.1    2 years ago

Same old same old from criminal Democrats. Out with the old criminal; and in with a new one.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
8  MrFrost    2 years ago

I just find it entertaining. Trump wants them disqualified for having sex when he cheated on all three of his wives and paid a porn star 130k to keep her mouth shut. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  MrFrost @8    2 years ago

Trump is a god. Havent you got the memo ? 

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
8.2  Ronin2  replied to  MrFrost @8    2 years ago

I find it entertaining that the left elected a known rapist and pedophile.

Yet has the temerity to lecture anyone on their sexual habits.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
8.2.1  MrFrost  replied to  Ronin2 @8.2    2 years ago
left elected a known rapist and pedophile.

The left had nothing to do with putting trump in office.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
8.2.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Ronin2 @8.2    2 years ago
I find it entertaining that the left elected a known rapist and pedophile.

Do you find it as entertaining that the right elected, and is trying to elect again, an adjudged rapist?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
8.2.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ozzwald @8.2.2    2 years ago

Trump, assuming you are talking about him, was never convicted of rape.

If you need to exercise your lbut trump  obsession to excuse your own refusal to have standards, you might want to use it when  trying to deflect from someone who voted for trump. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8.2.5  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @8.2.3    2 years ago

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll - The Washington Post

 he said that the conduct the jury effectively found Trump liable for — forced digital penetration — meets a more common definition of rape. He cited definitions offered by the American Psychological Association and the Justice Department, which in 2012 expanded its definition of rape to include penetration “ with any body part or object .”
 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
8.2.6  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @8.2.5    2 years ago
Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll - The Washington Post

So never convicted then. The judge simply ignored the jury's finding in a civil trial.

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
8.2.7  George  replied to  Ozzwald @8.2.2    2 years ago

256

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
8.2.12  JBB  replied to  Tessylo @8.2.11    2 years ago

How Small? This Small?

original

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8.2.13  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @8.2.6    2 years ago

Huh ?

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
8.2.15  Ozzwald  replied to  Sean Treacy @8.2.4    2 years ago
If you need to exercise your lbut trump  obsession to excuse your own refusal to have standards, you might want to use it when  trying to deflect from someone who voted for trump. 

Nah, I'm just pointing out how hypocritical some people can be.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
9  Sean Treacy    2 years ago

this sums up what I saw:


What I have noticed about Fani
Willis after watching her testimony:

- Willis is not credible or honest -

Willis is arrogant and rude

- Willis is not smart or well spoken

It's clear Fani Willis did not earn the job she has.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
9.1  MrFrost  replied to  Sean Treacy @9    2 years ago
Willis is arrogant and rude

Clearly you've never heard of Trump... He literally mocked a disabled reporter, but Willis is rude. Ok.. LOL

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
9.1.1  Ozzwald  replied to  MrFrost @9.1    2 years ago
Clearly you've never heard of Trump... He literally mocked a disabled reporter, but Willis is rude. Ok.. LOL

Not to mention Trump's arrogance by making his primary defense that he should have absolute immunity from all laws.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
9.1.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  MrFrost @9.1    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
10  CB    2 years ago

I have it on my set for several hours already. . .in and out. . . still trying to connect the dots as to what is being surmised throughout it. The judge is doing a stellar job of moving the 'day' forward and an avoidance of stagnation.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
10.1  MrFrost  replied to  CB @10    2 years ago

I have it on my set for several hours already. . .in and out. . . still trying to connect the dots as to what is being surmised throughout it. The judge is doing a stellar job of moving the 'day' forward and an avoidance of stagnation.

It's a show trial....that's all. Trump's team just wants to delay and distract. 

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
10.1.1  Sunshine  replied to  MrFrost @10.1    2 years ago

   It's a show trial..

lol….it did expose a lot. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
11  author  JohnRussell    2 years ago

Fani Wilis father, a lawyer who has tried cases all over the country, and the world, testified this morning about all the death threats is daughter got while he was living with her, including crowds in front of her house calling her nigger and bitch. 

Its hard to see the judge disqualifying her. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
11.2  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @11    2 years ago
ncluding crowds in front of her house calling her nigger and bitch. 

If that truly happened, then there should be a news story about this...especially in far left Atlanta.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
11.2.1  JBB  replied to  bugsy @11.2    2 years ago

So, you really believe the crowds of MAGA protesters outside Willis' home were acting nice and being respectful huh?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
11.2.2  bugsy  replied to  JBB @11.2.1    2 years ago

Don't know what you read but I said nowhere near what you ranted.

I said if the protesters ACTUALLY were there saying what JR said they said, there would be stories in the Atlanta papers/news channels. This is a predominate black city, so if anyone said what he says they did, there would be stories about it.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
11.2.3  JBB  replied to  bugsy @11.2.2    2 years ago

There were stories about racist MAGAs at her home...

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Participates
11.2.4  GregTx  replied to  JBB @11.2.3    2 years ago

Got a link?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
11.2.5  Right Down the Center  replied to  JBB @11.2.3    2 years ago

Where, I can't find them on line.

 
 
 
Gazoo
Masters Silent
11.2.6  Gazoo  replied to  JBB @11.2.3    2 years ago

Sure thing, bud. I call total bullshit on that claim.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
11.2.7  Sean Treacy  replied to  bugsy @11.2    2 years ago

They didn't have cell phones in 2021.  There's no way that anyone can prove what happened. If a large crowd was hurling racial slurs at an elected official in 2024, sure, someone would have video of it on their cellphone.  But in the world of 2021, before all that technology existed, there was no way to show it happened. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
11.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @11    2 years ago
Fani Wilis father, a lawyer who has tried cases all over the country, and the world,

you got Smolleted...

He also  claims he knew about Covid before anyone else  did in 2019 (it was in South Africa apparently) , and doesn't believe in banks.  

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
11.3.1  CB  replied to  Sean Treacy @11.3    2 years ago

You spend to much time trying to denigrate the wrong people. That is, right or wrong, Fani Willis' father is not on trial. 

 
 

Who is online







96 visitors