╌>

Independent Senator Says He's Done Supporting Any Aid to Israel

  
Via:  John Russell  •  last year  •  61 comments

By:   Robert McCoy (The New Republic)

Independent Senator Says He's Done Supporting Any Aid to Israel
Angus King says it's time to end all aid to Israel's "indefensible" horrors.

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Angus King says it's time to end all aid to Israel's "indefensible" horrors.


Drew Angerer/Getty Images

A staunch Senate moderate on Monday issued a remarkable statement regarding the hunger crisis in Gaza, saying he will not back U.S. support for Israel so long as its campaign of starvation continues.

The centrist Senator Angus King, an independent of Maine, stated, "I cannot defend the indefensible. Israel's actions in the conduct of the war in Gaza, especially its failure to address the unimaginable humanitarian crisis now unfolding, is an affront to human decency."

King, who has previously been critical of Israel's actions, said the starvation gripping Gaza is "a deliberately induced famine among a civilian population—including tens of thousands of starving children" and "can never be an acceptable military strategy."

The October 7, 2023, attack by Hamas, King said, "cannot in turn justify the enormous toll on Palestinian civilians caused by Israel's relentless bombing campaign and its indifference to the current plight of those trapped in what's left of Gaza." While condemning Hamas in no uncertain terms, King noted that "recent events have placed a moral burden on Israel to ameliorate the current crisis, a burden it has thus far totally failed to meet."

"For these reasons, I am through supporting the actions of the current Israeli government and will advocate—and vote—for an end to any United States support whatsoever until there is a demonstrable change in the direction of Israeli policy. My litmus test will be simple: no aid of any kind as long as there are starving children in Gaza due to the action or inaction of the Israeli government."

King's statement comes amid horrific images and reports of starvation in Gaza thanks to Israel's blockade. Meanwhile, the tide appears to be slightly turning, domestically and internationally, against Israel's actions—which B'Tselem, a leading Israeli human rights organization, on Monday deemed a genocide, joining other organizations such as Amnesty International.

s, Washington


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    last year

Has Israeli media been keeping the images of starvation in Gaza from its citizens ? 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1    last year

Maybe because fake stories of starvation in Gaza are a Hamas lie. Plenty of food there, Hamas takes a lot of it for themselves, and their buddies in the UN make it difficult for aid groups to distribute it.

Why is Hamas still holding hostages after all this time. Why are they starving their own people?

Food Is Stockpiled in Gaza and the UN Is Refusing the Group Ready to Deliver It

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.1.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    last year
Maybe because fake stories of starvation in Gaza are a Hamas lie.

Trump acknowledges 'real starvation' in Gaza, urging Israel to let food in

Trump acknowledges ‘real starvation’ in Gaza, urging Israel to let food in : NPR

Did you miss the MAGA memo? It's the latest conservative dance step, the hip-swivel flip-flop. It's where they accuse all those on the left who have been pointing out the tragedies like starvation in Gaza of being antisemites, and then they come swoop in and say "Ah, now we see there is starvation in Gaza and our Dear Leader has acknowledged it! But we're not antisemites! No, we're just champions of children! Yeah! That's how we'll frame it! The leftists are still the antisemites for daring to care about Palestinians! [ deleted ][ ✘ ]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    last year

"independent.."  Lol.  Guy who boycotted Netanyahu's speech is now a "staunch moderate."

words have no meaning..

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.1  Ozzwald  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    last year
"independent.."  Lol

He is a registered independent Senator.  

Guy who boycotted Netanyahu's speech is now a "staunch moderate."

What does one have to do with another?

words have no meaning..

You have demonstrated that admirably.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Ozzwald @2.1    last year

He's just another antisemitic leftist in disguise who supports Hamas terrorism.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.1.2  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1.1    last year

He's just another antisemitic leftist in disguise who supports Hamas terrorism.

Let's leave trump out of this.... 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.1.3  Ozzwald  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1.1    last year
He's just another antisemitic leftist in disguise who supports Hamas terrorism.

Prove it.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ozzwald @2.1    last year
e is a registered independent Senator.  

Oh. You believe what he calls himself matters!  How quaint. 

What does one have to do with another?

You need that explained to you? Really?

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.1.5  Ozzwald  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.4    last year
Oh. You believe what he calls himself matters!

I believe what he say he is since he has been a registered independent his entire career.  Or do you think he did it because he could see into the future?

You need that explained to you? Really?

Yup.  Do you think moderates cannot boycott speeches that they don't believe in?  Is this world so utterly black and white to you?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.6  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ozzwald @2.1.5    last year
e what he say he is since he has been a registered independent his entire career.

He's a Schumer puppet. He caucuses with democrats and votes no different than any democratic glass of water. That you fall for such silly branding  as "independent" is completely on you.

o you think moderates cannot boycott speeches that they don't believe in

an elected government official who is actually a moderate will in fact show the basic level of respect to his "opponent" and  attend a congressional speech by a head of state even if he "doesn't believe in the speech," whatever that means.  By boycotting the speech, he demonstrated that he's an extreme partisan who isn't even open to listening to his opponents. 

If you want to ignore King's  actual record and pretend he's a "staunch moderate " that's on you. It's your credibility. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.1.7  CB  replied to  Ozzwald @2.1.5    last year

I am put in the unusual position of having to speak up on this: Pay 2.16. no attention. The comment would not impugn any independent statesman that supports the comment's position. Truth is truth and until one can prove a lie has been committed it's bull.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  seeder  JohnRussell    last year

Has Florida Representative Randy Fine’s shameless cheerleading for death gone too far for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee?

After winning Florida’s special election in April, Fine  claimed  that he was AIPAC’s “fastest-ever endorsement.” But on Monday, his name was mysteriously missing from AIPAC’s  database of pro-Israel candidates .

It’s not clear why Fine’s name has been removed from the ranks of lawmakers championing consent for Israel’s catastrophic military campaign, which has killed  more than 62,000 people  in Gaza. However, one possible explanation is that Fine’s recent remarks on the widespread famine in Gaza are too grotesque for even the most staunchly pro-Israel.

Last week,  ABC News  reported that 15 people in Gaza had died from starvation within just 24 hours, according to Gaza’s Ministry of Health. Fine responded to the report by wishing for more death and then claiming that it was all a hoax anyway.

“Release the hostages. Until then, starve away,” Fine  wrote  on X. The post continued, “(This is all a lie anyway. It amazes me that the media continues to regurgitate Muslim terror propaganda.)” The same day, Fine was  appointed  to the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

The  American Jewish Committee  condemned Fine’s statement. “The serious humanitarian situation in Gaza must not be taken lightly, especially by those at the highest levels of government. Implying that starvation is a legitimate tactic is unacceptable,” AJC  wrote  on X. “All those in need of humanitarian aid should receive it promptly and safely. Our leaders must focus less on scoring political points and more on doing their jobs.”

But Fine doubled down Sunday,  writing  on X, “There is no starvation. Everything about the ‘Palestinian’ cause is a lie.”

If not his comments on Gaza, perhaps it was his bloodthirsty statements advocating violence against protesters  that lost him AIPAC’s support ?

In another post Sunday, Fine revealed that the only thing he really supports is murder, pushing for a bill that would allow drivers to run over pro-Palestinian protesters blocking bridges and roads with impunity.

“The Thump Thump Act will allow Americans to run over these Muslim Terrorists,” he  wrote . “They don’t try this in Florida because of the bill I helped pass in the Legislature to allow them to be run over. It’s time to take it national. Thump thump.”

“To be clear, the Thump Thump Act will also allow you to run over BLM, Antifa, illegal immigrants, and anyone else who intentionally blocks roads! Thump thump!” he wrote in a  separate post .

AIPAC has not returned   The New Republic ’s request for comment. Just a few months ago, the lobbying group celebrated Fine. Crucially, AIPAC poured more than $126,000 into Fine’s campaign, according to   FEC filings .

But Fine insisted he didn’t need AIPAC’s money to be a bigot. “And for the haters who said they bought me, I have news for you,” Fine  wrote  on X in April. “They had me for free.”

 
 
 
fineline
Freshman Silent
3.1  fineline  replied to  JohnRussell @3    last year

"They" have for free alright, Religion, Bigotry and Greed. Another fine example of the garbage that IS the GOP!  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    last year

Things progressives care about:

1.  Thousands of children actually starving to death in Nigeria? Nope.

2.  Slaughter of aid workers by Hamas?  Nope.

3.  UN failing to deliver food because Hamas isn't getting it's skim?  Nope.

4.  Innocent hostages raped and murdered by Hamas?  Nope.

5.  Making a country that was invaded responsible for all discomfort in the land governed by the aggressor? YEP!

I guess they would have been protesting the Allies genocide of Germans during the world wars. They would have been working to protect the Nazi government just like they are hamas. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    last year

Bizarre and absurd comment. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4.1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1    last year

Well, who do you support, it doesn't seem to be Israel?

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
4.1.2  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @4.1.1    last year

Well, who do you support, it doesn't seem to be Israel?

How much more cash do you figure we should send them? Aren't you against sending money to foreign countries? 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    last year

Things conservatives care about:

1.

[ ✘ ] 2. licking Trumps feet.

3.

[ ✘ ] I could go on with my own list of made up bullshit just like your list, or you could perhaps discuss the real elephant in the room.

Trump acknowledges 'real starvation' in Gaza, urging Israel to let food in

Trump acknowledges ‘real starvation’ in Gaza, urging Israel to let food in : NPR

Oh no! Is Trump an antisemite now?!? What will conservatives do now? That's been their most used attack on "the left" claiming they're antisemites anytime anyone points out the tragedy occurring in Gaza, what are they going to do now? Apologize and tell the left that they too care about Palestinian kids now? Talk about eating crow...

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.2.1  bugsy  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4.2    last year
1.removed for context

2. licking Trumps feet.

3. removed for context

Many Leftists sure have an infatuation with Trump's body parts...especially number one. 

Weird way to go through the day. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
4.2.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4.2    last year
Things conservatives care about:

1. removed for context

2. licking Trumps feet.

3. removed for context

Yet it is many members on the left that keep mentioning it.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4.2.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  bugsy @4.2.1    last year
Many Leftists sure have an infatuation with Trump's body parts...

I'm simply trying to describe what I'm seeing in America using the closest analogies I can that even a Trump sycophant could understand. If a person's response to the long list of crimes and unethical behavior committed by Donald Trump is "Well what about the leftists!" or "Bill Clinton" or "Benghazi!" then they clearly have their head shoved so far up Trump ass that their eyelashes tickle his tonsils.

In this case, instead of addressing the fact that even their Lord and Master Trump has acknowledged the starvation happening in Gaza, they simply make hay of my analogies.

 
 
 
Gazoo
Masters Silent
4.2.4  Gazoo  replied to  bugsy @4.2.1    last year

It would be nice if they kept their sick, twisted, fantasies to themselves.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4.2.5  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Gazoo @4.2.4    last year
It would be nice if they kept their sick, twisted, fantasies to themselves.

It would have been nice if conservatives had kept their sick, twisted convicted felon and admitted sexual predator to themselves.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
4.2.6  Right Down the Center  replied to  Gazoo @4.2.4    last year

It would almost make it possible to take them seriously.

 
 
 
Gazoo
Masters Silent
4.2.7  Gazoo  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4.2.5    last year

Maybe if the dem elites hadn’t coronated cackles the clown as their nominee things would be different?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
4.2.8  Right Down the Center  replied to  Gazoo @4.2.7    last year

She certainly wasn't the best they had.  She couldn't have been, could she?

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4.2.9  Greg Jones  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4.2.3    last year

There is no starvation going on in Gaza. Provide proof. Ignore what Trump said. 

Why do leftist apologists never blame Hamas for any wrongdoing?

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
4.2.10  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @4.2.9    last year

Why do leftist apologists never blame Hamas for any wrongdoing?

Because reality is that Israel is just as guilty. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5  bugsy    last year

King has always been a die hard liberal, masquerading as an independent. He has caucused with democrats since he entered Congress. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
6  Buzz of the Orient    last year

When the news reports and media speak of the Gaza conflict, the words we see and hear referring to Israel are "genocide", "humanitarian crisis", "starvation", "war crimes" but what we DON'T hear are words describing Hamas as "declared terrorists", "rapists", "murderers", "kidnappers", "war criminals for taking hostages, hiding themselves, their weapons and control centres in and under hospitals, schools, mosques, UNRWA facilities and refugee centres", or "using innocent civilians as human shields", or "civilians aiding and/or hiding militants", nor do we hear HOW MANY MILITANTS are included among the inflated numbers of casualties.  The media and some politicians such as Angus King release their bias and IMO latent antisemitism by accentuating the anti-Israel while omitting citicizing Hamas.   As the article says, "...While condemning Hamas in no uncertain terms.  FOR WHAT?  For being bad guys?  The defeat of Hamas is inevitable, so why don't they surrender in order to save the lives and health of their own people?  Does anyone have a good answer for that?  Even the Nazi regime and the Japanese had the minimal morality to surrender in order to save themselves and their civilians.  Where are the demands from the rest of the world that they surrender?

As I've said elsewhere on NT, Israel MUST accomplish 2 things and cannot stop fighting in Gaza or fighting the propaganda war being waged against it by the rest of the world until they have accomplished:

1. The release of all remaining live and dead hostages

2.  The eradication of Hamas which has proven that it will NEVER give up attacking Israel whether by repeats of Oct 7 or the continuation of infiltrating and carrying out terrorist attacks on Israel and its citizens, or launching missiles or sending kite bombs into Israel.

And I don't blame Israel for WHATEVER it has to do to stop the Palestinians or Hamas or Iran or its other proxies from attacking Israel, refusing to allow the Israeli people to live in peace.  

CAVEAT:  I do NOT agree with what the settlers are doing to the peaceful Palestinians who live near them but they ARE entitled to defend themselves from terrorist attacks.  I have NO love or support for the Ultra-Orthodox, even for personal reasons.  However, notwithstanding what the rest of the world demands, I believe Israel is ENTITLED to sovereignty over lands conquered by it in a war brought by others against it.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @6    last year

What Israelis , and those who agree with what they are doing in Gaza, need to do is listen to what people like Angus King are saying, and what they are saying is "enough is enough".  Unfortunately the damage to Israel's international reputation has already been done. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @6.1    last year
Unfortunately the damage to Israel's international reputation has already been done.

The only people saying that were demanding a cease fire on the morning of October 8th.

Hamas's strategy laid bare: keep Gaza close to a hunger crisis and occasionally flip the switch to get the world to pressure Israel to allow Hamas to restock its shelves and refill its coffers. It's monstrous, and its enablers ought to be filled with shame:

Lucky for us, the Nazis didn't have so many useful idiots in America and other allied countries to do their work for them. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
6.1.2  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  JohnRussell @6.1    last year
"Unfortunately the damage to Israel's international reputation has already been done." 

Yes it has, Hamas' propaganda war and methods taught to them by the Iranians has worked wonderfully.  But then I'm not a bleeding heart, notwithstanding I'm so outnumbered by others. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.1.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  Sean Treacy @6.1.1    last year

But its all Israel's fault say the Hamas chorus:

Additionally, nearly a thousand UN aid trucks have passed through the Israeli inspection points and sit in Gaza with their goods undistributed. Trey Yingst, a fairly harsh critic of the Israeli counteroffensive,   reports   that the IDF offered the UN five different routes to distribute the aid; as of yet the UN does not appear to have accepted any of the distribution offers.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the U.S.- and Israel-backed organization that distributes aid to Gazan civilians instead of Hamas, has been appealing to the UN to join the distribution efforts and work with GHF to get the food to those in need. Yesterday, GHF offered simply to deliver the UN’s stalled aid for free. Again, thus far no one has been able to compel or convince the UN to deliver needed food aid.

Why are Hamas and the United Nations starving Gaza? The answer is different for each.

There is no question that Hamas is the reason Gazans have diminished access to food, as it intentionally withholds from civilians the food aid that comes through.

But there is something even more monstrous to Hamas’s strategy: It has backed away from a cease-fire that Israel has bent over backwards to bring to fruition. “Hamas is the problem now,” one non-Israeli negotiating source   told Barak Ravid   a few days ago. “Every day they delay their response, more Palestinians die. We can’t keep waiting for the answer of a few f–king Hamas leaders in Gaza. Who do they even think they are?”

It’s been two weeks since Israel agreed to a cease-fire deal that would likely have ended the war. At the time, I   asked   if Hamas really wanted the war to end. We have our answer: no.

The reason is both simple and demonic. The deterioration of conditions for civilians under Hamas’s thumb has convinced the terror group to keep the war going and to try to bring the enclave to calamity.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.1.4  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @6.1.1    last year

WWII was an entirely different scale to this. Germany invaded and conquered over 25 countries and killed many millions of people. 

Israel has had appx 7000 casualties in this war, with about 900 dead.  That is a low total for a two year long war. Hamas must not be very good at killing enemy soldiers. 

18,000 American pilots were killed over Nazi occupied Europe in WW2. 

Not to mention ground troops casualties. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
6.1.5  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  JohnRussell @6.1.4    last year

It's not the numbers that count, it's the example. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.1.6  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @6.1.5    last year

The scale of the conflict matters. Germany and Japan were bombed to bring to an end a war that killed 50 million people (some estimates are higher). It was an entirely different scale to what is happening in Gaza. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
6.1.7  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  JohnRussell @6.1.6    last year

The scale matters?  BULLSHIT!!!   The principle of surrendering when it is inevitable that you are defeated in order to end the carnage would apply if it were a million or a hundred.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @6    last year
The media and some politicians such as Angus King release their bias and IMO latent antisemitism by accentuating the anti-Israel while omitting citicizing Hamas.   

Seriously, you should stop with this shit. 

If killing tens of thousands of women and children was a good idea that would bring peace it would have happened already.  One of Israels arguments is that they are being forced to kill all these people because Hamas wont give up. Its a very bad argument.  If killing 50,000 people wont make Hamas give up then killing 60 or 70,000 people wont do it either. All you'll have is 20,000 more dead people and more opposition to Israel around the world.  Do something different for fuck's sake. 

Declaring victory and leaving might be a good idea. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
6.2.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  JohnRussell @6.2    last year

If the Gazan civilians want the war to end, they vastly outnumber the militants, so why don't they do something to oppose the militants for not surrendering in order to stop the carnage and destruction.  IMO it's because they hate the Jews more than they hate their Hamas enslavers.  Why doesn't UNRWA do something towards stopping Hamas?  Easy answer - the United Nations supports the terrorists. 

Golda Meir said it decades ago, and it rings true today:  “If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there would be no more violence. If the Jews put down their weapons today, there would be no more Israel,”

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.2.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @6.2.1    last year

As we have seen this year, Israel has by far the strongest military in the middle east region, and also has an implicit guarantee of their sovereignty from the United States, which has been the case from the beginning. Hamas is not an existential threat to Israel. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
6.2.3  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @6.2.2    last year
"Hamas is not an existential threat to Israel." 

What is it then? From all appearances it seems that radical Islam and Hamas want to destroy Israel and exterminate all the Jews

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
6.2.4  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @6.2.3    last year

What is it then? From all appearances it seems that radical Islam and Hamas want to destroy Israel and exterminate all the Jews

What is it then? From all appearances it seems that radical Israelis and Christians what to destroy Gaza and exterminate all the Palestinians. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
6.2.5  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  JohnRussell @6.2.2    last year

Did the United States prevent the Oct 7 attack?  Is it going to prevent any repeats of it?  Has it prevented the kite bombs and the balloon bombs and the missiles and infiltration of suicide bombers?  Would YOU live where you had to run to a shelter now and then?  Would YOU want your children to live there, when at any time they could be murdered by a suicide bomber or an invasion like Oct 7?  Actually, maybe Americans might find Israel safer because you never know when or where the next mass gun violence might take place in America.  Maybe some Americans are conditioned by the extent of gun violence in THEIR country that they think it's okay for Israel to experience terrorist attacks once in a while. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.2.6  Vic Eldred  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @6.2.5    last year
Maybe some Americans are conditioned by the extent of gun violence in THEIR country that they think it's okay for Israel to experience terrorist attacks once in a while. 

The key word there is "some."

Most Americans are with Israel. Don't fall for the few who are trying to speak for the rest of us.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
6.2.7  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.2.6    last year

I was careful to use the word "some", and maybe those "some" would be ones who feel that Israel should stop its war in Gaza. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.2.8  Vic Eldred  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @6.2.7    last year

You are always careful with words. I only wish the "some" were only trying to end a war.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
7  CB    last year
The October 7, 2023, attack by Hamas, King said, "cannot in turn justify the enormous toll on Palestinian civilians caused by Israel's relentless bombing campaign and its indifference to the current plight of those trapped in what's left of Gaza." While condemning Hamas in no uncertain terms, King noted that "recent events have placed a moral burden on Israel to ameliorate the current crisis, a burden it has thus far totally failed to meet.

At what point does a sense of proportionality come into play? That is Mr. King's concern. How long do we have to read horror stories of deaths of innocence. . . just because the Palestinians can not forcibly expel those who use them for great evil? 

The 'impossible' Middle East and all its sagas continue to hold the world by their collective 'balls'. . . and United States presidents 'one and all' are cursed by it's lands.

Holy Land: What is holy about any of this?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8  seeder  JohnRussell    last year
ODF.LJpmEr7u_hvP4jzgBiaA_A?w=32&h=32&qlt=70&pcl=fffffa&o=7&cb=thws4&pid=1.2&rm=3
Haaretz
› opinion › ty...

Don't give Netanyahu a free pass. He knows exactly what he is …

The well-known Israeli commentator and investigative reporter Raviv Drucker lets Benjamin Netanyahu off far too easily when he casts him in the prime minister's favorite role: As the political football kicked between far-right minister Bezalel Smotrich and the White House; as the disconnected old man who "wasn't woken up" in time to save Israel on October 7; as the politician focused solely on maintaining his base, and indifferent to everything else.

 

 

Drucker's Netanyahu floats trial balloons and contradictory statements, he zigzags and stalls, just to kill time in office. Thus, the Gaza war runs itself, supposedly without strategy or clear goals. It's the peak of the "spray and pray" approach.

 

This portrayal may sound unflattering and passive for a leader who fancies himself as the daring heir of Churchill and Roosevelt. Yet, it actually serves Netanyahu by softening principled resistance to his apparently purely tactical or reactive decisions and actions. That he is exploiting opportunities and buying time are not signs of lacking a strategy – they are the implementation of his strategy, and under favorable conditions.

 

On the domestic front, Netanyahu hasn't let go, even for a moment, of his scheme to establish authoritarian one-man rule without checks or balances. Even if his progress has been uneven, due to unforeseen events and obstacles, it will continue until he has eroded popular opposition to his rule and political resistance in parliament. Ehud Barak is right when he wrote in Haaretz that this is a state of emergency for democracy.

 

But Barak's hope that a million Israelis will take to the streets and topple the regime seems delusional as long as Netanyahu steamrolls the attorney general, mocks the judges at his criminal trial, and appoints shills and a rape suspect to head key Knesset committees.

 

Even in war, Netanyahu operates with deliberation and a clear direction, visible despite the chaos and faux "surprises" – such as the "shocking" discovery that people deprived of food will suffer malnutrition or starve to death.

 

Beyond its northern and eastern borders, Israel has followed a strategy that was developed and practiced over the years: to neutralize Hezbollah's missile capacities and then strike Iran's nuclear facilities with American support. Netanyahu waited for the pieces to fall into place – Hezbollah to equip itself with booby-trapped beepers, the IDF to deploy its new laser defense system, and a change in U. S. leadership – and then capitalized on the enemy's major errors, striking Tehran in near-optimal conditions.

 

But unlike the meticulous, long-term planning in the north, on the southern front, Israel simply hoped things would be okay – until it suffered the October 7 disaster. The defeat by Hamas led Netanyahu to the most consequential decision of his career: to dismantle Palestinian society in Gaza and drive it into exile as punishment for the massacre of Israelis, just as the Israeli narrative presents the first Nakba as the Palestinians' punishment for rejecting the partition plan and attacking the nascent Jewish state.

 

The execution may be erratic and wrapped in confusing declarations, but the actions are clear: "The government is racing so that Gaza is erased," as Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu aptly put it. This is the "total victory" that Netanyahu promised.

 

Just like the historians of 1948 who debate whether the Nakba was a premeditated Zionist plan or an accidental development, future scholars of the October 7 war will examine whether Netanyahu intended ethnic cleansing or was dragged into it.

 

Some will rely on his government's founding documents: Its platform declares that the Jewish people have exclusive rights "over all the territory of the Land of Israel," to argue that this was a calculated strategy. To bolster their position, they will cite the pogroms and expulsions of Palestinians in parts of the West Bank, perpetuated in parallel with the destruction in Gaza. His detractors will point to Netanyahu's indifference to intelligence warnings and his responsibility for the failure of October 7 to argue, like Drucker, that the prime minister merely drifted like foam on the waves.

 

The debate is truly fascinating. But more important are the facts on the ground, which reveal a clear and ruthless strategy bearing Netanyahu's unmistakable signature.
 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
8.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  JohnRussell @8    last year

I learned years ago that Ha'aretz was an anti-Israel medium, and I place its attitude about the Israel government at about the same level as Al Jazeera's. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @8.1    last year

The rest of the world has a very bad opinion of Netanyahu.  Are they all anti-semites ? 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
8.1.2  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  JohnRussell @8.1.1    last year

I don't like him either, but that doesn't change my mind about Israel.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9  Trout Giggles    last year

Lot of hate in this seed. And that's coming from the side that thinks the only good Palestinian is a dead Palestinian.

Nah...we're not advocating for genocide....

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
10  Perrie Halpern R.A.    last year

Here is what I have to say about this topic as a Jew.

First of all, both Hamas and Netanyahu have been using the Palestinian people as fodder for their political agendas. I don't believe either of them. 

Second, what is not talked about is that on campuses around the US, the hate to Jewish students started 2 weeks after Oct. 7. My daughter told me about what happened on the UC Davis campus, and it was disgusting. Apparently, no one remembered that Hamas started this and killed people who supported Palestinian people. A fellow Ph.D student wrote in the school paper that all the Jews should be kicked off campus and that Jews should be killed. And no he was not Palestinian but some white dude.

Now it is open season on Jews. Don't believe me, check out this video: 

Not just that, why is there no people speaking out on this? Here is a great article by Debra Messing: 

Where is the outrage for what is going on here and around the world? Are we not a minority in need of protection? My daughter has had the nastiest things said to her, including why doesn't she just die. 

It breaks my heart when I see children suffer, but this war was brought on by Hamas, and they will not go to the table for negotiations. They do not care about their people. They are collateral damage for their cause, and this is never discussed. Of course, Netanyahu doesn't care, since he knows that Hamas doesn't care and he has his own agenda. But don't blame Israel for what is happening here. Hate is hate, and as a minority group, we should have the same rights as any other minority group and not fall victim to collective punishment.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
10.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @10    last year

I don't hate Israel. They have a right to exist. I blame Netanyahu for not prosecuting this "war" logically. And Hamas did start it, there's no doubt.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
10.1.1  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Trout Giggles @10.1    last year

Fair enough Trout. Thank you!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
10.2  CB  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @10    last year

I always respect your point of view . Now let me express another point of view: Starving children. . . and the irrational attitude being. . . exposed by MAGA supporters professing to be defenders of children. . . all children  in this world need protection or the best that every society can give them. . . even or especially from adults !  

We can not look away. And what we see is WRONG. It is not enough that children died from bombings a year ago on both sides of the ADULTS falling out and declaring war on themselves, apparently it is not enough that the surviving children from the bombs will have PTSD throughout their long (or sadly shortened) lives, but now  they  are being told to DIE from man-made/induced starvation. 

And the whole world sits, spins, looks, at the field of 'play,' but are expected to remain in the 'stands.' 

We ought to feel something and so we do.

That is all that is being said. We must not condemn any child, not a one, for the actions, stupidity, or arrogance of adults.

Dearest Perrie, I have the upmost respect for you and the Jewish people, but on principle I can not support what Netanyahu's Israel is doing in the name of all Israel anymore than I can support what the United States government is doing by staying silent. It all unfortunately reminds me of what 1946 post-war confessional prose piece by the German Lutheran pastor Martin Niemöller wrote in that complicity is not a good 'look.' 

Speaking of looks, the media showing images of starving children has the 'proper' effect that it should: We feel something. For all of us can feel the tug on our hearts or should for children slowing 'dying out' in starvation . . . in a world overflowing with food. 

Our hearts (and mind) are justifiably broken.

?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.freepik.com%2Fpremium-photo%2Fblue-broken-heart_954948-3088.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=437a0161d2e5d0dcaa319c4f96176eb6202f1c04c07062ca8854025977da9316

For we made an oath spiritually and even with our mouths that we would protect the living innocent when and where we can with our internal goodness and our actions. 

And no, Perrie, I do not presume to lecture you about Israel, I am simply speaking up on the issue of starvation. . . and children. . . every living child. . . that closes its eyes in death and don't even know WHY THE WORLD HATED HIM OR HER SO MUCH AS TO LET IT HAPPEN without protest or fighting to save them.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
11  Sean Treacy    last year

I'm torn between believing progressives either genuinely want to destroy Israel, don't care but feel its in their best interests to do so to ensure they maintain margins among islamic immigrants (cant risk losing michigan again)  or are just incompetent fools who don't recognize that rewarding 10/7 will only result in more 10/7s.  They are like terrible parents who keep giving their spoiled kids whatever they want so the kid will stop acting out.  The kids of course recognize the pattern instantly and keep acting out to receive more rewards. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
11.1  CB  replied to  Sean Treacy @11    last year

With all that put into context: MAGA supporters should stop spoiling Trump!

Israel is an important place for our country and so are the world's children equally. Adults, much like in our own national case of Sandy Hook, are missing in action on doing the one thing that adults must do for living kids. . . speak up and act to protect them. Starving does not feel good. . . it will not end good. . . you most definitely would speak up and act too if it was occurring to you. . . or anybody you call a friend.

So do not presume to lecture us about it. Do not conflate Israel's tragedy with Hamas with the man-made faces (on our television screens) of famine children with bulging bellies-atrophied muscles, and eyes searching for "help!

I will remember my humanity, every Jewish person should to remember his and hers, and so it ought to be with MAGA supporters. This is occurring 'afar off,' but it is the world 'right outside our door' and so it could be us one day APOLOGIZING as a nation for sitting on our hands while innocence dies and we did nothing but spread personal and private ideology about using power and 'retribution' where diplomacy complex as it may be a better tool.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
12  seeder  JohnRussell    last year

Sorry to anyone who wanted to comment further, I am locking this seed. 

 
 

Who is online