Tucker Carlson Goes "Nuclear" On Trump
I wont try to characterize it in detail but it is HARSH.
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Tucker Carlson did a 40 minute monologue at the start of his You Tube show yesterday, it was virtually nothing but an attack on Trump following Trump's Easter Sunday threat toward and taunting of Iran and Muslims.
I wont try to characterize it in detail but it is HARSH. He also attacks Trumps tv evangelist "spiritual adviser" grifter and fraud Paula White, and Pete Hegseth's comparing the downed and rescued pilot to the Easter Sunday resurrection of Jesus Christ.
We are in uncharted territory.
Tags
Who is online
124 visitors
I have no use for Tucker Carlson but his take on this is revelatory.
I don't have any use for him, either because his religion is stuck so far up his ass he chokes on it. Besides, I really won't waste 2 hours of my life listening to him bang on trmp when he had his chance but decided to lick boots instead
I mean , you have good points. And if Trump ran again I'm sure Carlson would find a way to rationalize supporting him. But this is a big break in MAGA. Carlson has millions of far right fans from his time on Fox News.
then let's hope the MAGA rise up and crush him
yeah but, who's going to tell those moronic lap dogs to do that?
They listen to the likes of Tucker, Large Marge, and Joe Rogan, don't they?
True, but they seem to listen to Trump a lot more.
most of them manage to goosestep in unison when the polls open ...
Recently Rogan has become more critical of Trump--- especially since Trump started the current war:
Joe Rogan claims Trump started the war in Iran to distract Americans from the Epstein files
Joe Rogan has become increasingly critical of President Donald Trump since the start of the Iran war
TV dinner trust fund frat boy that needed to have his ass kicked regularly on private school playgrounds ...
Carlson had white supremacists on his Fox News staff.
Does this mean Tucker becomes a hero for the left and gets invited on the Rachel Maddow show?
It means the truth about Trump is so obvious now that even Tucker Carlson cant ignore it.
his mean Tucker becomes a hero for the left and gets invited on the Rachel Maddow show?
100%
My guess is they want to trade Tucker for Fetterman.
We are in very serious times yet you continue to focus on partisan crap.
Trump is unhinged and this guy is in control of the military.
Do you recognize that Trump is unfit to be PotUS?
Forget about D, R, Left, Right bullshit and deal with the reality that the USA has an entirely unhinged PotUS, a sycophant cabinet, and a spineless Congress.
They cannot and will not admit that the people who have said Trump is unfit from the beginning were right.
It was obvious 10 years ago that he was unfit (he was a known pathological liar, a crook, an ignoramus, and psychologically unbalanced) and even if we give grace to people who voted for him back then there is no excuse for supporting him now.
Thanks for the advice, I will take it into consideration. I suppose this means you don't want to actually respond to what I said in my post.
as long as we're all clear on who's going to pick up the biggest part of the tab for trump's malfeasance, I'm good ...
None of those maggots are getting grace from me. They fucked this country up by voting for that piece of shit
preach TG.
I'll be looking for maga hats this coming 4th of july ...
I could get up on my high horse but then that would bring the trolls out and I'm not in the mood for them
go for it, but in one of your groups, I've got points to burn ...
No I have no interest in your petty partisan crap. This is a serious situation. How is it possible that you are not taking this as deadly serious? Trump is unhinged and unfit. Do you recognize that?
But back then we did not see just how far this lunatic would go. People need to recognize that this is serious. That even if he comes up with an excuse to backtrack, that the USA cannot keep this lunatic as PotUS.
I think you should give up. You're never going to persuade him that trmp is a deranged, unhinged, bad character of a "man". I don't think conversing with the magas here are worth my sanity
What I've got in mind is a full on heated debate (in HD) where I unleash my fury at those who allowed this to happen all because they wanted to elect a man who would "own" the libs, kick the ass of the woke and send "snowflakes" to the loony bin.
Nobody should have to persuade any rational human being that Trump is unfit for PotUS and should be removed.
It should be entirely obvious at this point.
Interesting that you would respond at all then.
Yes, we have lots of them
Who said I am not, because I am not screaming about it all day every day and find it amusing how someone the left hates is now being touted as correct? Oh my, how can anyone have a sense of humor with a serious situation going on?
There you go trying to change the subject again. I will just keep calling out that nonsense.
Trump is unhinged and unfit. Do you recognize that?
It is certainly an important post worthy of deep consideration and a careful response, like this:
There you go trying to change the subject again. I will just keep calling out that nonsense.
I will not be party to your game.
Interesting that deep consideration yields nothing.
What is the game?
Trump is threatening to annihilate civilians, and you repeatedly refuse to acknowledge that he is unfit to be PotUS.
What does this man have to do before you open your eyes to what he is?
lol
There you go trying to change the subject again. I will just keep refusing to play and calling out your attempts.
I will not be party to your game.
Does not matter at this point, your refusal to acknowledge that Trump is unfit to be PotUS is a tacit declaration that even now you consider this lunatic fit to be PotUS.
Nice try but no. It acknowledges no matter how hard you try and how much you make up accusations with no data you can not get me to play your game and let you change the conversation. That seems to really bother you.
I will just keep refusing to play and calling out your attempts.
I will not be party to your game.
There were many hundreds of US bombers and their crews shot down over Germany and occupied Europe during WW2. Iran is virtually defenseless against our Air Force this time. This is the time for our country to live up to our values, not talk about "ending" civilizations.
Deep consideration of your question yielded an appropriate response. See Comment 2.3.16.
As I recall WW2 did not end until the allies were in the city knocking on Hitlers door and a nuke was dropped.
But are they willing to come to the table and negotiate in good faith?
It is time to end the war with a victory.
I dont think that has anything to do with what i said
Victory in Europe Day was May 8, 1945 when Germany surrendered unconditionally ending the war in Europe.
The first nuke dropped over Hiroshima was on August 6, 1945.
Nagasaki was nuked on August 9, 1945
The Empire of Japan surrendered unconditionally on August 15, 1945.
Right now that victory would be Iran's.
Then it seems we should keep going
This has been evident far longer than ten years, if anyone had been paying attention.
You gonna lead from the front, or do you favor sending others to die, instead?
The lunatic you support and defend has wasted blood, money, and USA political capital (and our dwindling reputation) to transform the Strait of Hormuz from an open waterway into a spigot controlled by Iran:
Only when he deserves it but thanks for your opinion.
Is Trump fit to be PotUS after threatening to kill the Iranian civilization?
Asked and answered several times yesterday.
Now you move to the 'I already answered that' bullshit dodge.
When people spend more time and words deflecting and dodging a question, that just shows what the answer is.
In your case, it shows clearly that you believe Trump is fit to be PotUS.
No, it doesn't. But asking a question already answered shows game playing
I consider Trump to be unfit to be PotUS. He is well beyond the point of being unfit, but his threat to wipe out an entire civilization should clarify this for any rational mind.
You have made that perfectly clear and are welcome to that opinion.
We assaulted Germany from the air along with our allies truly obliterating most of the nation, but they fought on for 4 more years until boots on the ground from both the east and west stopped Hitlers nonsense.
We were in Afghanistan for 18 years and Trump orchestrated the exit because air power alone can't / won't change a culture/religion/ barter society.
We were in Somalia for over 30 years and exited because air power alone can't / won't change a culture/religion/ barter society.
We could go on...
We are witness to the largest country in the world, who with limitless assets and air power has not been able to dominate the pesky nation of Ukraine for over 12 years.
And with all of that history and even his own constant blaming of Obama, Biden and others; Trump and Kegsbreath decide after committing war crimes in Venezuela
that they can bring down Iran in a matter of days or weeks.
Along the way "we" stopped Russian and Iranian oil sanctions ?
helping both Russia and Iran. Hurting Ukraine.
If this were a movie, theatre goers would be walking out for all of the unbelievable plot twists.
The writer, producer and director of this movie is sadly insane
Also projects that you disagree with my position that Trump is unfit, and thus believe he is fit even after his threat to wipe out an entire civilization.
No it doesn't and even suggesting it shows an unrealistic reach.
Of course you are welcome to your opinion
You could always stop playing your game and reread what I have already said if you actually forgot it.
What line must Trump cross before you recognize that he is unfit for office?
Would not surprise me if he got his own show on there.
[deleted][✘]
It means that Tucker has the balls to publicly NOT support Trump no matter what and to call out a major problem.
Even this guy gets it. One has to wonder what is going on with the rest of Trump supporters given Trump's threat to wipe out a civilization.
Amazing. A rightie turns against trmp and automatically we all embrace him/her.
tucker is still a piece of shit. He's still racist, misogynistic, and a religious zealot. He's not my hero and Rachel Maddow has good taste
Tucker, much like MTG, has the ability to parse information to judge which way the political winds are blowing. No matter how reprehensible their characters may be, they are helping steer the ship and on occasional all winds blow in the same direction.
So I would not say that he has "balls" so to speak. He just is just holding his finger into the wind and following where he thinks the winds of the country are blowing. Can Tucker bring people to break with Trump/MAGA? Dunno. He might complete the thoughts in some of their heads that may be trying to break through, but right now the faithful on the Trump Team are still faithful, just like in Iran. We haven't had the winds of change (to complete the metaphor) blow strongly enough to dislodge the people in power in either country.
The Who _ Won't Get Fooled Again
Have you ever actually watched Maddow's show?
Yes.
Tucker Carlson criticizes Trump’s expletive-fueled Easter message threatening Iran: ‘Who do you think you are?’
Conservative broadcaster long opposed to military intervention against Tehran rebukes president over sweary social media post demanding reopening of the Strait of Hormuz
Tucker Carlson criticizes Trump’s expletive-fueled Easter message threatening Iran: ‘Who do you think you are?’ | The Independent
WATCH: Iranians have started gathering on bridges & power generation stations across the country to prevent them from being targeted
video at link
(4) Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 on X: "❤️🇮🇷 WATCH: Iranians have started gathering on bridges & power generation stations across the country to prevent them from being targeted https://t.co/Np54hI58Uz" / X
Not at all surprising. This is something we might do if facing similar circumstances.
This is very good news as it makes it clearer to those who would carry out Trump's orders that they are illegal and are war crimes.
Thank you for the clear and sane head. I thought he would just go ahead and bomb them but his military know what is right and what is wrong...welll not Kegsbreath. After all he did say fuck the Geneva Convention
Literally none of that is true.
but I get it. The talking points are issued and the literal communists are pushing the propaganda.
Jackson Hinkle. lol.
I think everyone agrees that folks were called to do it. How many people are doing it and if they are doing it of their own free will is still pretty unknown.
I also wonder if it is a war crime if you warn someone that they are going to target something and civilians try and use themselves to stop it. They were forewarned.
If Trump actually did destroy the Iranian civilization, would you not consider that a war crime? Do you not recognize that targeting civilians in such a matter is illegal and is a war crime?
Un-fucking-believable.
Retired US Army General Wesley Clark says he believes the military will refuse to obey illegal orders tonight.
LOL. you people are crazy.
One can only hope (assuming Trump actually carries out his threat ... which hopefully is still doubtful).
Trouble is, it only takes one general to agree to this, and Hegseth can clear the road for that general to be in charge. So then it becomes the burden of his direct reports, on down, to NOT engage in Trump's threatened insanity.
I expect Trump to back down in some way, but I do not see how he gets out of the corner he has painted himself into. That is worrisome ... cornered animal + unhinged.
I think there will be intensive bombing but Trump will say we could and will do more if Iran does not surrender in "two weeks".
As lunatic as he is he nevertheless understands he has painted himself into a corner and will try to save face by doing a lot of bombing but it wont rise to the level of "ending their civilization" .
So you don't know either.
Possible. And maybe that was plan B all along.
Faux obtuseness.
It is obviously a war crime.
Do even the most basic research. Get informed.
Childish snark aside
Objectively I see gray and possible ways around it that I am sure Trumps legal team is looking at.
Subjectively it is a war crime as is saying mean things about Iran.
How about Iran putting civilians at those places. No one seems to care about their war crimes.
Bombing sites with the intended purpose of harming civilians is a war crime.
Trump has threatened to return them to the Stone Age. Do you recognize that this is intentional harm to civilians??
Do some research!
Threat is not a war crime. Action would be if it can be proven whatever is bombed has no military value.
[deleted][✘]
Trump is threatening a war crime. That is the point I made. If he acts on the threat it will be a war crime.
You continue to deflect with faux obtuseness.
A guest on MS Now this afternoon , Ret. Major General Randy Manner, says he has military contacts and CentCom is resisting Trumps threats. They will ignore an order to bomb civilian infrastructure.
thank god for cooller heads and ethical ones
One can only hope he is correct.
And people with spines.
If they do ignore his war crimes order will their days in command be numbered? Where is Kegsbreath in all this ?
He has an appointment with his make-up artist
You just posted propaganda from a Neo Stalinist leader of the American communist party.
But, sure call others crazy.
dont talk about tucker carlson like that
Link?
The man is an idiot.
They can do what they want. He certainly does
Lisa Murkowski has been an unending enabler of Trump. Now she speaks up. What about the other dozens of times you should have senator?
Interesting. Trump supporters hate her.
Well..... when both sets of extremists think you're a horrible person, you're probably doing something rihght.
You are a both sideser.
I'm addicted to rational thought.
Wait a minute. You are talking about Trump here, right? When both sides of extremists think Trump is a horrible person, you think that means Trump is probably doing something right?
Is that your meaning? At a time when Trump is threatening to wipe out a civilization?
LMAO
Much better to be a "both sider" than to literally ramble on incessantly about one person that has triggered some so badly they can't get that person off their mind...ever.
Read the conversation. It's only 3 comments.
I did. Why are you refusing to clarify?
Considering the name Lisa Murkowski is in the post it is not hard to figure out who you were referring to
Sure you did. Riiiight.
Two reasons. First, the post was perfectly clear to anyone who bothered to read it. What part of the word "her" do you need help with, eactly?
Second, I'm not interested in this game where you make up shit out of thin air and then demand someone refute it like you're William Stoughton or Joe McCarthy.
No, but you actually read the post, which gives you an unfair advantage.
You could have been using Murkowski as an example of a Trump hater. Thus assembling the both sides against Trump notion.
I asked you to clarify.
And unlike Trump, what she's done is represent the interests of many people in her state. For example, American Indians ("Eskimos"):
Alaska Native issues
Murkowski is an active member of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs and served as Vice Chairman of the committee during the 110th Congress. She is the Chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee and a member of the Committee on Appropriations, and has a continuing role on the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. In 2009, she was honored with a Congressional Leadership Award by the National Congress of American Indians . [ 63 ] She is the first Alaskan to receive the award. [ 63 ] . . .
(Cont'd HERE)
Coincidence?