Did Anyone Watch Trumps Mentally Ill Performance At The WHCD Last Night?
Someone called me up this morning and asked if I had watched speech at the White House Correspondents Dinner , and I said no I had forgot about it but I would look it up on You Tube. So I did. Sad to say, his mental condition appears to be deteriorating fast.
Tags
Who is online
90 visitors
No one has ever seen anything like it before.
This is sadly true.
I was going to say I was surprised the speech wasn't hosted live by a Trump enthusiast last night or today.
Surprising silence.
Until I read further down the thread, lol.
another exhibition of POS/POTUS's unfitness for office and the number of spineless maga jellyfish in the legislature ...
Now you are tying like Trump talks.
Try and get him out of your head
He is mocking Trump.
He was right about one thing. When he leaves nobody is going to have any money.
he's spent his entire life spending money that wasn't his in the first place, and letting others take the fall for his incompetence ...
He talked for a few seconds less than one hour.
Two other news stations watched it live "for us". doing a split screen with their reporters talking about it after he gave up on the teleprompter and went into rally mode rambling comedy that he alone thought was funny.
Nothing thrills a crowd like a fat man trying to shame fat people.
No, and from what I've read about it, most of the people there didn't either. Why would they?
The Washington Post reported:
He said that he had once mixed up CNN reporter Kaitlan Collins, whom he said “never smiles,” with a transgender social media personality, Dylan Mulvaney, after he called the 34-year-old cable news star a “young, attractive woman.”
He said he planned to host twice-weekly fights at the White House.
“We will have sloppy Chris Christie, one of the sloppiest human beings, fighting,” Trump said to silence. “I could mention the governor of Chicago, but I’m going to mention instead Jerry Nadler. Oh my God! They’re fighting for a big piece of cheesecake, big fat piece of cheesecake.”
Then he told a joke about Sen. Adam Schiff (D-California).
“I hate some people,” he said to groans. “He’s a liar, and I called him watermelon head because he has the largest head I’ve ever seen with the smallest neck, pencil neck. How does that make a fat, ugly head on a little pencil neck?”
Trump’s entourage laughed at his vitriolic barbs, but the journalists sat in “stunned silence” as Trump attacked the journalists who cover him.
Trump proved to all who heard him that he has low regard for a free press. But he is a master of insults and disparagement.
He is not a master. A master would be witty and would produce intelligent insults. Trump is distinguished in that he insults people more than anyone else. He is a prolific asshole.
It's as if the Naked Emperor decided he wanted to try his hand at stand-up comedy.
id that he had once mixed up CNN reporter Kaitlan Collins, whom he said “never smiles,” with a transgender social media personality, Dylan Mulvaney, after he called the 34-year-old cable news star a “young, attractive woman
explain how this is an insult.
Trump is an extremely embarrassing figure as president of the United States. Its cartoonish, in its own evil way.
[✘]
now it just might be me , and i havent had my first cup of coffee yet , but that actually sounds like a good idea, something similar to heated discussions or the Meta page even have a ( what i think) is a decent name for the page that could withstand the test of time .
Administration BGC ( bitches gripes and complaints).
They won't because it is confusing to them.
The left has tried to gaslight us in believing Mulvaney is a "beautiful woman", but when Trump compares her to Mulvaney, all of a sudden comparing to a "beautiful woman" is an insult.
Sounds like the left is admitting that Collins is ugly. Pretty rude of them to do that.
Is that seriously the best you can do?
Prove me wrong
[✘]
[✘]
If they didn't they would get fired. Immediately.
I happened to see a random juxtaposition where one article on the news feed had pictures of Melania and her prior partner and immediately below that the next feed was of a stone-faced Kaitlyn Collins and then several of her smiling and the resemblance between the 35 year old reporter and the 25 year old model is uncanny.
Maybe that's why Trump is fascinated with Collins; he sees a young Melania and he isn't getting any respect from either of the women.
so he's projecting his unhappiness with melania upon kaitlyn ...
There is something amiss in Trumps head, no surprise there.
Since pussy now escapes him he is doubling down on the $$.
He still cannot take it with him.
I saw some of it. He wasn't delivering humorous barbs. A lot of it got nasty and he didn't mix up Collins with Mulvaney. Whatever joke he had in mind had Collins set up as Budweiser's first choice for the Bud Light commercial, but someone chose Mulvaney instead and that cost Budweiser dearly.
I didn't find the Trump rant itself funny, but I really cracked up as the camera paned the room showing those stone cold faces of the leftwing activists who pretend to be reporters.
He was really hard on those who didn't attend.
To be filed under:
What goes around comes around.
No shit.
Its amazing how you claim to be someone who wants to preserve traditional American values and then you support Donald Trump. In the neighborhood I grew up in one thing the older guys always told us was "dont be an asshole".
But John, it was the left that destroyed traditional American values. It was the left that called American Presidents "Fascists." It was the left that used riots and violence.
Are you saying that only the rest of us have to be decent?
The left is getting back what they dished out
No, Vic, the entire nation is getting hit by Trump. Do you not recognize the damage this guy is doing to our nation (and to the planet)? It is not just 'the left' who is being hurt by his words and deeds.
Do you not see this??
Donald Trumps entire political career is based on racial grievance . I have been over this many times before.
You have said it many times before. That doesn't make it true.
Example please.
I have explained it many times.
How did Donald Trump go to the head of the polls in 2011 after he took it upon himself to be the king birther?
He had no other political experience, he had no platform to run on, other that the race based claim Obama was not born in hawaii and was lying about being a student at Columbia.
Birtherism became Trump’s signature issue. Throughout early 2011, Trump aggressively promoted false claims about Barack Obama’s birthplace. This vaulted him to the top tier of early GOP polls and gave him national political relevance.
He used this attention to test a presidential run. Trump traveled to early primary states, delivered speeches to GOP groups, and openly suggested he might seek the Republican nomination. His birther crusade was widely seen as the central fuel for this trial balloon.
Obama released the long‑form birth certificate in April 2011 , largely in response to Trump’s media pressure. Trump publicly took credit for forcing the release.
The release undercut his momentum. Once the long-form certificate was published, Trump’s main issue evaporated, and his standing as a potential candidate weakened.
If Trump had anything other than racism to run on, why did his support evaporate right after Obama humiliated him?
But he got his foot in the door and 4 years later came back with many of the same themes - the "real" Americans were having their country taken from them.
Yes, you have given your opinion many times.
Its not an opinion, its history.
Your interpretation of a few items.
According to Gemini:
Usually when putting a cigarette out on your face...
This is what I mean when I say you view the world through a straw.
Sad.
Yes, with a moderate cabinet and seasoned WH and GOP operatives in the WH during his first term , Trump did several good things while not fucking up too many things because the adults would not let him.
Correction to Gemini. The Future Act did not "restore" funding . The HBCU funding was annual or biannual through many administrations, Trump made it automatically renew annually, removing it as a bargaining chip for either party.
The opportunity zones never panned out. Trump continues to repeat dollar figures and 9,000 distressed communities but neither the WH or the IRS ever respond to reporters request for proof of success or validation of the numbers.
Trump's Unsupported Claim About Opportunity Zone Investments - FactCheck.org
The False Promise of Opportunity Zones - Boston Review
Go to the lead in the polls in 2011? He wasn't even a candidate then?
He had no other political experience, he had no platform to run on, other that the race based claim Obama was not born in hawaii and was lying about being a student at Columbia.
Obama produced the documents and it ended the issue and btw there was nothing racial about it. The issue had been raised involving white candidates before Obama. We wouldn't have such issues if political parties verified place of birth for candidates before primaries are held. If that is the basis of the "white grievence" claim, then you have failed miserably.
False. As a candidate in 2016 Trump's signature issue was IMMIGRATION/MIGRATION.
He used this attention to test a presidential run.
False. He already had plenty of attention via talk shows and saying whatever was on his mind.
Obama released the long‑form birth certificate in April 2011
And that ended the issue. The DNC should have had that released in 2008.
The release undercut his momentum.
That has been proven false. The RNC couldn't seem to get rid of him in 2016 when most people doubted he had a chance.
So, much for the young lefties who do the programming for everything from Google to copilot.
No John, he is not a racist and a lot of black and brown men seem to know that.
The racists like Jasmine Crockett all seem to be in the democrat party.
I think that brings this little discussion to an end. Class dismissed.
Another Poll Confirms Trump as Republican Frontrunner - The Atlantic
Is the Donald now a fake fake candidate? Donald Trump is leading the pack of Republican presidential candidates, according to a new poll from Public Policy Polling. Trump is ahead of second-place Mike Huckabee by nine points--despite that fact that Huckabee has actually held elected office and gave a strong challenge to John McCain in the 2008 GOP primary. PPP's Tom Jensen writes that just 38 percent of Republican primary voters say they'd vote for someone who rejects birtherism-- and most of those people are supporters of Mitt Romney. And 23 percent of Republican voters say they won't vote for anyone who's not a birther. Slate's Dave Weigel says this result "makes it harder and harder to pretend [Trump's] a non-factor in 2012."
The turmoil within the Republican Party has created these unusual conditions in which Glenn Beck says Trump makes him "uncomfortable," while the chair of the Republican National Committee calls him "credible." But Trump's the only candidate who's managed to capitalize on staying power of the conspiracy theory to win "the highest level of support we've found for anyone in our national GOP polling so far in 2011," Jensen explains, after months of "gridlock" among the top tier.
The poll finds support breaks down among the candidates like this:
Trump : 26 percent
Huckabee : 17 percent
Romney : 15 percent
Trump wanted to run for president in 2012 but had no natural political constituency. He became the king birther to try and build that constituency.
This is not an invented take, it is what happened.
It is an invented take. And certain people lapped it up.
Here:
"Hillary Clinton had a rough week. From collapsing into a vehicle to her collapsing poll numbers, the Democratic darling is steering her campaign into an iceberg. Put simply, she’s losing.
On Friday, Hillary hit rock bottom. In order to turn the tide in the final weeks of the campaign she resurrected an issue that had long disappeared from the 2016 campaign — birtherism. It was a move that will prove to be her Waterloo.
{mosads}“For five years [Republican nominee Donald Trump] has led the birther movement to delegitimize our first black president,” Hillary said. “His campaign was founded on this outrageous lie.”
The “birther movement” of which Hillary speaks dealt with the issue of whether President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Because the President failed to release his birth certificate when asked, some began to question what the President was hiding. After Trump brought the issue to the forefront, Obama finally release a birth certificate showing he was born in the United States.
To Hillary, though, Trump’s attachment to the birther movement was much more nefarious. In fact, it was racist.
“He is feeding into the worst impulses, the bigotry and bias that lurks in our country,” the Democratic presidential nominee proclaim. “Barack Obama was born in America, plain and simple, and Donald Trump owes him and the American people an apology.”
Hillary’s motivations were clear. She flunked her first pseudo debate with Trump on NBC’s Commander in Chief forum earlier this month, placed herself in hot water when she declared half of Trump’s supporters were in a basket of deplorables, and further sowed seeds of mistrust when she lied about her health. She had to change the narrative.
“Hold out baits to entice the enemy,” wrote Sun Tzu, “feign disorder, and crush him.” Hillary, by baiting Trump with the birther controversy, was hoping the outspoken candidate would respond in a manner than that was undisciplined and unpresidential. She was hoping Trump would be Trump. It was a gamble she lost.
“President Barack Obama was born in the United States, period,” Trump said in response. “Now, we all want to get back to making America strong and great again.”
Trump’s response — short and simple — showed a candidate who was not only more disciplined but a candidate who understood he was in the lead. It showed a candidate that was willing to shrug of a desperate attack in order to stay on a script that has brought Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, and Colorado back in play.
Moreover, Trump turned the issue back on Hillary. In laughing off the attack, Trump reminded America that the so called seeds of birtherism were planted by Team Clinton during her rough and tumble primary with Obama in 2008. He also reminded the American people that he was the one who settled the issue, thus removing the cloud hanging over Obama’s head.
“Hillary Clinton and her campaign of 2008 started the birther controversy,” Trump said. “I finished it.”
Seeing a Hillary misfire, the media pounced. A clamoring press demanded an apology from Trump for insinuating Obama was not native born.
But why should Trump apologize for merely asking to see a birth certificate? If an American wants to board a plane they must give their first born, but the leader of the free world does not have to show a birth certificate? If anyone should apologize, it should be the President who let the controversy lag on by failing to provide a simple document we all need to show to get a driver’s license.
Next the media claimed Trump lied when he claimed Hillary’s campaign was behind the birther movement. This, too, was a premature denunciation.
Patti Solis Doyle, who was Hillary’s campaign manager until the Iowa caucuses in 2008, admitted first in a tweet and second in a CNN interview that a Hillary staffer first spread the birther issue. While the staffer was fired, the termination happened after the cat was let out of the bag. Patient Zero, thus, was a member of Team Hillary."
How ‘Birtherism’ became Hillary’s Waterloo
The birther issue was a non-issue that only had a life because Obama didn't turn over his birth certificate right away.
The only real danger Obama faced during his campaign came not from anything a Hillary staffer created or anything Trump or McCain said, it came from his own wife who was saying things like "the only time I was proud of the country was when they elected Barack." The Obama campaign quickly found a way to shut her up. The media kept the story of the Reverand Wright quiet, and the financial crisis took care of the rest.
Funding HBCUs - lol, hahahahahahahaha, cough, cough, hahahahahahahahaha
Stone-faced because they were shocked that trump was really that unfunny. My god that speech was an EPIC failure.
Stone faced because they couldn't stand a taste of their own medicine
You were not embarrassed for our nation that this buffoon is the PotUS???
Can you imagine any other PotUS, or even a prominent US politician, behaving like this??
Their own lack of a sense of humor? You make no sense at all.
They blew a fuse over Obama wearing a tan suit...
Bill Maher: “Trump has told 1 trillion lies, but when he says the DSA are actually communists, that’s not one of them.
Yep. Far right Bill saying what most on the left want to ignore.
Sounds completely and utterly disqualifying to me.
Bill Maher is wrong unless he is talking about Communism as defined by Marx. If he is using Communism as you use it (USSR-style), he is flat out wrong. And anyone who can read can see that the DSA (for all its faults) is NOT advocating USSR-style Communism.
DSA's most idealistic views are arguably aligned with Marx' most idealistic views.
Be specific. Details matter; definitions matter.
You could always just watch what bill maher said. Or you could always just play word games and ignore what the d s a is saying.
Again you troll rather than add any value to the discussion.
You reply to my comment, fail to add any valuable information, fail to rebut, just a pointless, feeble quip.
It is a suggestion you are obviously not interested in. I even have the link above for you. You seem to want to ignore the damage the DSA is doing to the dem party by ignoring it or minimizing it because it is not the right type of communism.
Cool.
270+ spinless trump ass-lickers in the legislature, a cabinet full of incompetent loyalists, 6 christo-fascists on the SCOTUS bench, and you're worried about 4 socialists on the november ballot ...
cool.
Again, as usual, you invent bullshit. You have nothing so you make shit up. More trolling from you.
It does not matter what Marr said. DSA is clearly not trying to create Soviet Style Communism. Anyone claiming socialism or communism without qualifying what they mean by those terms is not saying anything.
Thats what I thought. Nothing but accusations, ignoring what the dsa is doing to the dem party
Yawn
I think you'll have to just face it; you'll never see eye to eye with someone who has their head up Trumps ass.
Again you post trollish bullshit.
My comment was about the use of the label communism. I do not approve of the DSA platform and am quite aware of how certain DSA platform items are terrible optics for the Ds. Pay attention and you would know that.
You continue to add no value and merely troll.
Trump calls Ds ‘communists’ and his supporters just parrot away.
In a 2020 social media post, Mamdani wrote:
“Each according to their need, each according to their ability.”
This is a direct quote from Karl Marx’s Critique of the Gotha Program , a section of his Communist Manifesto
Eric Adams exposes Mamdani for quoting Karl Marx in 2020 social media post | Fox News
After all these years, you still do not know what that means???
That is evidence that Mamdami is in favor of people living to work vs working to live. That he favors a society where technology is sufficient to ensure that basic needs for everyone is systemically available and that people do not live paycheck to paycheck. That he believes in an idealized society where people contribute their talents to make it better for everyone.
That is an ideal; it is arguably pie in the sky. But there is nothing wrong with the ideal itself. That ideal is what Marx defined as Communism.
Contrast that with the Communism of the former USSR. Now show us all evidence that Mamdami, et. al. seek an authoritarian command economy where the majority of the people have no democratic say and live a life of poverty and oppression while the ruling class enjoys the benefits of the single party rule.
[✘]
But there is nothing wrong with the ideal itself. That ideal is what Marx defined as Communism.
100 million deaths in 100 years trying to implement it,…”there’s noting writing the idea itself.” Pure delusion and that definition of insanity playing out for us,
But there is nothing wrong with the ideal itself. That ideal is what Marx defined as Communism.
100 million deaths in 100 years trying to implement it,…”there’s noting writing the idea itself.” Pure delusion and that definition of insanity playing out for us,
And that is what the d s a wants to do. And it is more than just an ideal.They are trying to put it into action.
They need to get stopped now before they get any more powerful.
They could only get eight democrat congress people to say that they are not socialists, but capitalists, and they are not ashamed of our country.
Bill maher is right
It doesn't matter what they are called. What matters is the damage they want to do and will do to this country if they gain more power.
Posting your tired irrelevant opinion twice doesn't make it any less irrelevant.
Again with this obtuse game of yours.
Communism, as Marx envisioned it, was an idealized classless, stateless society in which productive resources and public affairs were collectively controlled.
It was, IMO, a fantasy — Marx's utopia.
No authoritarian state, no ruling class, no capitalist exploitation of workers, and no class with power based on controlling the means of production and distribution. People would contribute according to their abilities and the collectively produced social product would be used to meet society’s needs. To wit: “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.”
It is accurate to describe the former USSR system as a brutal, authoritarian and oppressive one-party system that exploited, imprisoned and killed its own citizens. It is also conventional to call it a “communist state” because it was ruled by a Communist Party professing Marxism-Leninism; it successfully created another meaning for the label 'Communism'.
Claiming that the USSR itself was the classless, stateless society Marx described as communism reflects ignorance of even the most basic distinction between Marx’s vision and the brutal authoritarian regime that claimed to be working toward that end-state while demonstrably moving in the opposite direction. Political repression, entrenched hierarchy, and control by a ruling elite is the opposite of a free people collectively governing themselves.
It is pathetic that you continue to ignore (intentional faux obtuseness) the profound difference between CommunismUSSR and CommunismMARX.
Another witless quip from you that missed the point.
The point is that regardless of what one calls a system, it is stupid and wrong to conflate Communism USSR with Communism MARX .
It is an illustration of profound ignorance to conflate Communism USSR —the actual authoritarian system created by the USSR—with Communism MARX —the classless, stateless society Marx described as the ultimate end-state. They share a name and an ideological lineage (Lenin and Stalin claimed to be Marxists), but they are NOT the same socioeconomic/political system.
The fundamental idea behind Marxism was to eliminate an oppressive, exploitative economic ruling class (bourgeoisie), not to replace economic power with single-party authoritarian rule. In short, socioeconomic/political control by the majority, not a tiny minority .
Marx's vision is arguably unrealistic, but it is the polar opposite of Communism USSR .
The rot is the corruption and dysfunction rampant in the current administration. Not to mention that the president is mentally ill.
I've noticed that some use this word against conservatives when they are losing the debate.
Happens quite a lot lately. Still have not had a leftist here post what 80/20 issue the country has where the left is on the 80 side. I have asked several times.
They won't answer because they KNOW the answer.
But yet you are unable to prove that opinion wrong.
here, prove these opinions wrong ...
What is there to prove? I believe that anyone pleading the fifth are hiding something. Doesn't matter who it is.
But since you have an automatic reaction to deflect to Trump, I will add this. Everything that was asked of Fauci was documented in his diary. He even pled when asked what color the carpet was in front of him. He, and his lawyers...are idiots.
You need to post better memes. No one watches the ones you post.
fauci's lawyer was removed from the hearing prior to questions. what would your plea be there if that had happened to you?
[✘]
Yet again with the nonstop trolling bullshit. You did not even make an argument, nor did you rebut anything I wrote, yet you make the delusional claim that you won a debate.
[✘]
Totally irrelevant.
The point is what the d s a is going to do to america if they gain power in the Democratic Party, not what kind of communists they are or are not. That is just trying to deflect from the actual issue.
The DSA has as much chance of taking over America as Trump has of going to heaven.
The point, established by Vic's post @5.3.6 which claims that the DSA are communists (as defined by the former USSR) is that the claim is wrong. I explained this in my post @5.3.10 and subsequent, more detailed posts.
You are arguing a strawman. I have never even opined on what might happen if the DSA took over the Ds and specifically what that might mean, but it certainly does not translate into a brutal, authoritarian regime that oppresses the majority for the benefit of the relatively tiny minority in power.
I understand that you cannot formulate a sound argument on the point I actually made so naturally you dishonestly shift to a different topic and pretend that is what we were discussing.
As often is the case, you have nothing.
If you had the choice between a DSA loon and a Republican who would you vote for?
Incorrectamundo. All 5.3.6 was is a quote from Bill Maher (it never specifically USSR communism). I even suggested to you that you watch Bill Maher speak so you would know what he was talking about and supplied a link which you seemed to not have done.
It was you that dishonestly shifted to a different topic and pretended that is what we were discussing.
The topic was not what kind of communism anyone was talking about but specifically what Bill Maher said since Vic posted a quote from him.
Your constant deflection is exactly why I correctly won the debate and someone seems to have seen fit to have that claim flagged. Another sign of losing a debate.
Pay attention. When Vic speaks of communism, he always refers to that of the former USSR.
You continue to troll rather than add anything constructive.
Pay attention.
What Vic did was directly quote Bill Maher.
Don't try and make it what Vic usually means. Pure deflection
All you are doing is continuing to troll rather than talk about the actual post, instead you want to talk about what Vic usually means. Nothing constructive to the quote.
Pathetic
there are very few "dsa loons" running for office.
I have never voted for a Republican for a major office, with one exception (Charles Percy for U.S. Sen.-IL during the 70's.)
I figured. And that is how the DSA loons will take over the party. No one seems to be stopping them and if they get to the general election they may very well take over. Maybe not overnight but soon enough..
And I stated that Maher was wrong and explained why. Pay attention.
Now you are trying to dance away from what Vic means to what Maher said.
And for that you said
"It does not matter what Marr said."
and
"Bill Maher is wrong unless he is talking about Communism as defined by Marx. "
Which would lead anyone to conclude you never actually saw what Bill Maher said.
Dance as you may you can't get away from your own words and the strong indication you are trolling and arguing for the sake of arguing.
I will leave it at that, there is nothing else that needs to be said.
All you do is make shit up.
My comment was crystal clear on why Maher was wrong if he was using 'communism' as Vic uses 'communism'.
The DSA is NOT pursuing communism per the former USSR.
Now if you have any thoughtful rebuttal, let's hear it. I am not holding my breath that you will deliver anything other than more trolling.
They were your quotes
I am still waiting for you to respond to what Bill actually said, not "if he meant........" or how Vic uses communism (which means nothing in the context of what Bill said)
Like you, I don't expect you to respond to what Bill actually said, it would mean you would have to watch it. I guess trolling is easier.
He had 6 other lawyers sitting behind him. Any of them could have taken the idiot's place, but apparently they were too much of cowards to do so.
Darn, I missed it.
I guess I could watch it on youtube or read the fair and balanced reviews.
The Odessey and the Iliad were probably more factual. Stick to the books.
You literally missed nothing.
between naps, a lengthy recitation of greatest hits from trump's maga rally bullshit, right after he veered off the teleprompter ...
What disgusts me most about the Trump presidency is the level of tolerance that many have for what politicians do. This goes so beyond not holding them accountable. Trump has been a disaster for this nation and continues to do damage every week he is in office.
Yet, no matter what, there are still millions who support this sick, abysmal human being.
Not only does this encourage others to behave badly, but it proves that we cannot trust the electorate (at all) to elect suitable individuals to run our government. This profound failure of the electorate is the root of the problem.
Someone who attempted to overturn the 2020 election should never have been allowed another opportunity to run for the presidency. The fact that Trump was able to run again—and then win—stands as one of the clearest indictments of the failures of our political system and of the judgment exercised by many voters.
Trump's approval rating it 41.1.... And that's an AVERAGE of all the polls... WOW.
It should be lower.
He pushed the USA into a war of choice that has no realistic path to even get to the state we were in before this ill-conceived, illegal war.
Not to mention the whole tyrant and traitor thing.
throw out the biased maga pollsters and the average is closer to the lower mid 30's ...
Trump posted this to his social media -
Trump posts a lot of garbage on social media. One of the many reasons I don't bother with it.
Probably why my blood pressure is good and I don't have a constant headache.
Namaste
Trump wouldnt post it if it didnt make his cult adore him. The whole thing is very bad for this country.
Yeah, as close to reality as this:
the only words that I'd like to hear that unamerican POS utter are his last ones ...
How about that Trump 2028 crap? I called it right after the 2024 election...Anyone who thinks Trump will leave power willingly after 2028 is fooling themselves. There's going to be a reckoning for all these self-described 'patriots' on the right. Get ready. Expect another round of treason against the republic, as Trump will try to stay in power no matter what.
there isn't enough time left on the clock of that POS ...
A woman who watched the speech called in to CSPAN afterwards and described Trump perfectly:
Funniest thing ever.
https://www.aol.com/articles/live-tv-caller-describes-trump-154315000.html?guccounter=1st
haven't heard that word since high school ...
she's right, he is ...