"The Commies Are Coming!" Is All They Got
Prices have not come down, mortgage rates are going up, the economy is stagnant, we are in a futile war in the middle east, the price of gas is high , and the president is completely corrupt not to mention nuts.
So what do you do if you are a conservative ? You yell "commie" this "commie" that and hope it stirs the pot enough to give you a chance in November.
Its hard to find a right wing media show these days that is not frothing with disgust at how commies are everywhere you look. Trump himself used the word "communist" 85 times during a recent two week period. I guess thats better for him than talking about the war, the economy, his blatant financial corruption, the constant weather disasters, and his failed 250 celebrations.
-
related
Economy slowed in second quarter, while inflation improved
Inflation has now been higher than the Fed’s 2 percent price-stability target for more than five years. U.S. stocks slid Wednesday, while Treasury yields soared, a sign that investors are growing anxious about the Fed’s willingness to combat inflation.
Voter unhappiness with the economy looms as a major threat to Republican hopes of retaining control of Congress in November’s midterm elections. In a Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday, just 34 percent of voters said they approved of Trump’s handling of the economy while 62 percent disapproved. And 59 percent of those surveyed said the economy is getting worse; 19 percent said it was improving.
Some of the forces that buttressed growth in recent months are almost tapped out, meaning the economy may slow, Bethune said.
Thanks to the president’s signature tax bill, individual refunds were more than 11 percent larger this year than in previous years, according to the IRS. But most refunds have now been dispatched.
Plus, the World Cup ended on July 19, meaning that international soccer fans have returned home, and Americans who splurged on the special event may tighten their belts.
Tags
Who is online
102 visitors
What they are attempting to do is so obvious.
better a socialist than neo-nazi pedophile enablers ...
Back in Medieval Times, rulers had several tools to remove those who were designated as CRIMINALS:
The GULOTINE
The HANGMAN'S ROPE
The FOUR HORSE STRETCH
The BOIL HOT TAR and, of course, the DUNGEON
Why can't we have these tools readily available? That seems so unfair!
The commies murdered 100 million people in a century. Imagine thinking that’s no big deal and we should just turn the country over to them.
Imagine you hallucinating and making things up about the current state of affairs in America.
I'm old enough to remember progressives claiming messages hid in "Nazi stages" were signs of some imminent takeover of the country by secret Nazis. That, of course, was in the old days before progressives decided the Nazi hatred for capitalism and Jews made them acceptable fellow travelers. Now days, candidates an openly brand themselves with SS symbols and progressives will go to war for them.
There's nothing secret about your party's love affair with communists. You don't have to look stage designs and imagine seeing secret messages of alliance with the Communists. Democrats happily elect open supporters of communism and are in the process of turning their party over to them.
Proof or is that what your masters have told you to say?
it's in their daily talking points memo
LOL. Not just in America. Notwithstanding the exaggerated historical numbers and twisted cause already corrected by me elsewhere on this site including long ago history that is totally different today his comments continue to be fabrications of actual reality when it comes to the present China.
Within living memory the CCP murdered 10 of millions of its own citizens in a famine, murdered and imprisoned millions more as part of a "cultural revolution", machine gunned thousands of peaceful protesters at Tiananmen Square, forced women to have abortions and outlawed having kids, built concentration camps where they violated every right known to mankind to in order to imprison religious dissenters, banned criticism of the government etc....
but hey, despite all those millions killed and the loss of all basic human rights, people aren't as poor there because the government allowed some capitalism.
Yeah communism! Germans were better off financially under the Nazis too, until the war went south. I guess some people would claim that justifies all they did too.
Communist apologists are no better than Nazi apologists.
I don't apologize for the wrongs that the Chinese government has done, but I do point out when what they have done has been misconstrued or exaggerated as your comments have consistently done, notwithstanding being corrected. Your comments never admit that the CPC has done some good things as well, such as pulling 800 million people out of abject poverty so that they have a proper roof over their head, free training and guidance to enable them to make a living, good food on the table, decent healthcare and free education for their kids up to high school graduation. By the way, why don't your comments ever indicate hatred of the present German government as much as they indicate hatred of the present Chinese government? Both have done some awful things in the past. And the Japanese, who pulled off a sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, did the Rape of Nanjing and Unit 731, why not them?
By the way, why don't your comments ever indicate hatred of the present German government as much as they indicate hatred of the present Chinese government
The current German government does not call itself Nazi a Nazi government and is not made up of Nazis. If China did not have a communist government I’d support it as happily as I do Japan, another country with monstrous deeds in the past that has reformed and become a model.
if the current German government was still a Nazi government, you would not find me on here saying “the holocaust was ancient history, look at all the good the Nazis have done for the people the they didn’t murderer”
I came across this and it seemed a timely reminder of what happens when communists achieve power. Now many people lack actual empathy and don’t really care about what happened to others so long as they weren’t victimized, but for those who do:
all of this happened during the lifetimes of most on this board..
Bill has it right.
The Khmer Rouge were Vietnamese - what has that got to do with China? In another month I will have lived in China for 20 years, and during that time I've come to know a lot of Communists - government officials, police, doctors, teachers, a judge, bankers, restaurant owners, storekeepers, farmers, students and plain ordinary people and NO one has been the kind of evil your comments make of them. There are good and bad people in every country, including yours.
They were communist but similar things did happein china. The article is about communism.
I've come to know a lot of Communists - government officials, police, doctors, teachers, a judge, bankers, restaurant owners, storekeepers, farmers, students and plain ordinary people and NO one has been the kind of evil your comments make of them
you have zero idea what the people you know who are old enough actually did during the cultural revolution.
are good and bad people in every country, including yours.
Get that strawman.
In another month I will have lived in that bastion of western communism known as Canada for 69 years and have only met one.
Maybe because I believe in innocence until proven guilty I give people the benefit of the doubt.
The COMMIE is "Dirty Diaper Donnie", who takes his advice and instruction from one of the leading COMMUNIST DICTATORS, PUTIN.
PUTIN is not a Democrat.
He is a murdering COMMIE!
Donnie has his own NEO-NAZI MURDERERS, "ICE," who are killing Americans, labeling everyone who opposes these J6 Rioters Club as "COMMIES", because they, too, are Trump's COMICS!
Are you a COMMIE, or a COMIC BOOK?
Socialists (who advocate Communist agendas) are popping up in blue state and even purple state elections like crab grass all over the country!
The only viable counter to that is to defend Federalism. Calling everyone and their comrade 'Communist' is NOT defending Federalism. Republicans are trying to sit on their wallets to make the argument about private property and defending the wealthy.
Republicans simply cannot gin up enough courage to defend America. They're too corrupted by a fiat currency that is losing value every day. Republicans (and old Southern Democrats) are fighting another Lost Cause simply because they think money is more important than anything.
pedophile enablers are popping up in republican red state primaries like incestuous goobers at a church picnic in the south ...
VIC:
No offence, but I think you have COMMIE mixed up with COMIC BOOKS. It's a natural mistake if one is a Trump loyalist.
Donnie, aka "DIRTY DIAPER DONNIE," calls everyone who disagrees with him COMMIE, whether they are or not.
It's similar to reasonable adults who call Donnie a CHILD RAPIST!
Republicans have many, many dead horses they can whip. The 'commie' horse is an odd one since Boomers are the only ones who can truly appreciate it. GenX might wax nostalgic over Reagan's 'evil empire' prose. But Millennials won't ride the 'commie' horse.
Republicans are ceding young voters (and the future) to the Democratic Party. Evening Turning Point USA youngsters won't understand the 'commie' dead horse.
Republicans simply cannot bring themselves to deliver a full-throated defense for Federalism. Republicans want to limit the argument to private property (and protecting the wealthy). So, Republicans can only try to beat life into the dead horse of 'communism'. That's not only stupid, it's pathetic.
The most popular entitlement in the world is Social Security. It only survives because of the US version of free enterprise.
Now you want to get rid of social security? Why not back up the money truck to the white house door and let the trumps of the world take everything.
Social Security is the main plank of the social safety net, and (the success of) capitalism is required to provide it.
You are worried about communism? Before FDR's New Deal communism was poised to make big inroads in America. Social Security played a big part in tamping that down.
Free enterprise did not create and sustain Social Security. That's a lie told by grifters, grafters, and un-American money grubbers.
Social Security was created and sustained by independent labor who was protected by Constitutional rights and the checks & balances of Federalism. Fat cat bankers want the money in the trust fund. Politicians of all stripes want the money in the trust fund. The champions of 'free enterprise' complain about the money being taken away from them. All the rich basturds think they're the Anthony Fauci of finance who know what's best for the mindless peons.
Free enterprise, according to post industrial capitalism, is an enemy of Social Security. Republicans are certainly not using the 'commie' label to protect and defend Social Security. Republicans are defending the right of nobility to raid, plunder, and steal from Social Security.
Do you pay for social security? Yes. Do you pay for your house? Yes. Do you pay for your car? Yes.
Are you saying that your house and car are entitlements the government can take from you at will?
I want to save it.
No doubt by privatizing it and turning it over to Wall Street speculators.
More like returning it to its original framework.
How do you know I'm not a postal worker?
What?
It was a program that was supposed to be self-sustaining. It no longer is.
Social Security did not debase our currency or try to inflate away the government debt. The Free Enterprise boondoggle has made more than just Social Security unsustainable.
Free Enterprise made most of American industry unsustainable so we've lost the ability to manufacture for ourselves. And we're still losing our industrial base. The Rust Belt was caused by Free Enterprise; not Social Security. Free Enterprise destroyed our resilient vertical integration to scrape one-time profit off JIT and unsustainable supply chains. Has Free Enterprise built more than it has destroyed?
Social Security is not why the US can't build bombs fast enough to sustain a prolonged war. Social Security did not force our military to rely on salvage yards for parts and replacements. Social Security is not responsible for $100,000 consumer vehicles, $30 steaks, or 75 year old houses costing $1 million. Social Security is not responsible for persistent 4% inflation. Free Enterprise has sucked the life blood out of the country and demands even more.
What does that mean? It's working now exactly as it was originally intended, as a form of social insurance helping older workers replace a portion of their pre-retirement earnings once they reach retirement age, providing payments to workers who become severely disabled and can no longer work, and providing financial support to the families and dependents of workers who died.
Perfect, until it runs out of money in the next decade because the government is in charge of it..
because the Republican government is in charge of it.
Good luck trying to get people to buy into that bucket of shit.
Since you think Social Security is a bucket of shit you are free to decline to receive payments. Americans understand that right wingers hate Social Security and want to see it fail.
It is cute that you seem to believe what I think
It is cute that you seem to believe what Americans want
It is cute that you seem to believe you know what right wingers want
It is cute that you seem to believe you know what right wingers want to fail
It's ugly that your comments on here are a bunch of reactionary propaganda and drivel.
Providing?
What about the self-sustaining part?
Explain why those who never paid into it, like Postal workers (who have a generous pension plan) were recently allowed to draw from Social Security.
Truth hurts sometimes.
Poor management by the irresponsible people we continue to place in charge of legislation and governance. Neither party gets excused from this. Both D and R voters have failed to hold politicians accountable and look at the financial situation of the US government today.
And, by the way, note that almost $11T of the national debt was added under Trump, and he still has more than two years left. Does that not bother your fiscal conservative principles? It bothers me greatly, so am I more fiscally conservative than you?
And don't deflect to Biden and Obama and Bush. I recognize that the debt rose hugely under them too. But you do not constantly defend them; you constantly defend Trump. And you argue that your support is based on his policies. So what are these great policies? What are these great results that cause you to support this abysmal human being, given all the damage he is doing to our nation?
“What are these great results that cause you to support this abysmal human being, given all the damage he is doing to our nation?”
Such an obvious question to have anyone ask given the overwhelming evidence of underwhelming performance.
It is bizarre, is it not, that anyone still supports Trump.
He has not delivered on his campaign promises (other than the border and irresponsible deregulation) but has violated many of his promises (e.g. lower prices, no new wars, ...) and continues to damage and embarrass our nation.
Why does anyone support this buffoon?
Some people are just too weak to admit when they're wrong. Admitting to one's failures is hard and not something a weak spinless lazy Trump supporter is likely to do when it's easier for them to just pretend they're 'winning', just like their dear Leader, and refuse any responsibility for voting in a complete dumpster fire of a President and administration.
Sometimes it's just ego. My step-father thought he was too smart to ever be wrong.
Sure, and there is some logic to that when one's views are defensible.
In the case of Trump, there is no defense. It is obvious from posts that his supporters cannot logically defend Trump. They do not even try anymore. Instead, they deflect or flee from challenges with silence.
To wit, they know they are wrong. They know we know they are wrong.
Despite the glaringly obvious fact that Trump is an incompetent, irresponsible, criminal, greedy, unpresidential, immoral, lawless, vindictive, childish, profoundly ignorant, pathologically lying psychopath, they keep trying to indirectly defend the abysmal asshole. No matter how much damage he does, no matter how much he embarrasses our nation, no matter how much personal pain they experience from his actions, they refuse to deal with reality.
I would have never believed such blind partisanship / cultism possible with so many yet there is no denying that tens of millions still support the abysmal human being.
No. Not long ago we had a president who said we are going to spend $2 on domestic spending for every $1 we spend on defense. We need to turn that around. At least Trump like Reagan is trying to grow the economy out of the mess, but the mess began with entitlements and the accepted idea that it was ok to print money.
It bothers me greatly, so am I more fiscally conservative than you?
It is very difficult to be fiscally Conservative at this point. That means not spending on one's own agenda or policies. I would have little respect for someone running for President who campaigns solely on reducing the deficit with no plans of their own. And the only way to really reduce the deficit is to get entitlements, which are growing on their own, under control. Who can touch entitlements?
And don't deflect to Biden and Obama and Bush.
Why not? Bill Clinton was the last U.S. president to inherit a balanced federal budget. When he took office in January 1993, the federal budget was already in balance for the fiscal year 1992. How could 4 Presidents be so irresponsible?
But you do not constantly defend them; you constantly defend Trump. And you argue that your support is based on his policies. So what are these great policies?
You know very well what they are. He is dismantling the progressive project which was put in place for the past 50 years.
Examples:
What about the idea of ending trade surpluses for other nations? It is past time to end the Marshall Plan and helping other countries. How about ending DEI? Not only is it discriminatory but think of the consequences of that. How about a President who finally had the guts to stand up to Iran? How about a President realizing that democrats perfected redistricting long ago and that Republicans are underrepresented?
That is enough for starters. Please let me know your thoughts.
-
So the deficit dropped to $254 billion in 1993 AFTER Bill Clinton signed the Omnibus in August of 1993 but it still wasn't "balanced" as you claim. The budget wasn't balanced until 1998 after Clinton signed the "Balanced Budget Act of 1997".But it's not like I expect any truth in a Trump supporting sycophants' comment, so you don't have to worry, I was not surprised in the least as the rest of the comment is of the same dishonest drivel.
Please, no more. I don't think we can handle another helping of bull shit.
How, exactly, have you imagined that Trump is trying to grow the economy out of the mess? Taking actions to raise the prices of goods is NOT the way to go. Wasting money on Iran and his other whims is NOT the way to go. Destabilizing trade relationships is NOT the way to go.
Although I do not see any PotUS having great control over the GDP or the economy, it is clear that a PotUS can damage the GDP and the economy. So let's look at some numbers:
6.74% increase, 5.34% increase, 5.02% increase (Trump 2.0), 4.55% increase (Trump 2.0)
His plan does not seem to be working.
So what is this strategy you have imagined?
Oh come on. Fiscal conservatism is not something you turn on and off. It does not mean 'do not spend money'. It means making prudent, responsible choices about how money is spent. Do you think Trump is doing that? If so, how is it possible for you to be so critical of Ds while failing to see blatantly irresponsible spending by Trump??
Because deflection just illustrates that you have no argument. We are talking about Trump. We are talking about the current PotUS who is currently taking actions that affect us all. We are talking about the present and the future, not the past (which cannot be changed).
That is abstract bullshit. What is he doing besides engaging in bigotry under the excuse of fixing DEI, removing bad illegals, etc? Be specific. Show us that you have more than simply an emotional aversion to anything D.
Un-fucking-believable. I know this has been explained to you repeatedly and you just keep on with the same bullshit. A trade deficit with a nation is NOT necessarily bad. The details matter; many deficits are net good for the USA! Consider Mexico, Vietnam, Taiwan, etc.. There is no way these nations can buy enough goods from the USA to even get close to matching what we buy from them. The trade relationship, however, is good for us. We get less expensive items that consumers want. In short, a trade deficit is not in itself bad. Trump has been pushing total bullshit and you clearly continue to buy it.
While I do agree in principle, Trump's approach is crude and counterproductive. We should be gracefully working with other nations to be more self-sufficient. Implement a phased withdrawal giving each nation suitable time to assimilate the change. Trump just pulling the plug is crude, stupid, and counterproductive.
There is no way to end discrimination. DEI is an attempt. Removing DEI is itself discrimination. There clearly is systemic discrimination against people of color, women, etc. Do you recognize that? If not, buy a vowel. If so, then you should at least recognize that DEI is an attempt to mitigate it to some degree.
That is complete bullshit.
ChatGPT fact-checking of your claim:
But worse, you totally ignore that Trump is pushing mid-census gerrymandering as one of his many methods to rig the midterms. You give this slimy con-man a pass ... again!!
That's what I thought
Just ask Kegsbreath. He fired or denied promotions to women, women of color, and men of color just because. Even tho they were imminently more qualified than he can ever hope to be
Encouraging investment and lowering taxes.
Oh come on. Fiscal conservatism is not something you turn on and off. It does not mean 'do not spend money'. It means making prudent, responsible choices about how money is spent. Do you think Trump is doing that? If so, how is it possible for you to be so critical of Ds while failing to see blatantly irresponsible spending by Trump??
Tell me what choices will make $39 Trillion go away? There is a reckoning coming.
That is abstract bullshit. What is he doing besides engaging in bigotry under the excuse of fixing DEI, removing bad illegals, etc? Be specific. Show us that you have more than simply an emotional aversion to anything D.
DEI IS RACISM! THE WORST KIND. THE KIND THAT PROVIDES YOU WITH A DOCTOR WHO SHOULDN"T BE A DOCTOR!
Un-fucking-believable. I know this has been explained to you repeatedly and you just keep on with the same bullshit. A trade deficit with a nation is NOT necessarily bad. The details matter; many deficits are net good for the USA! Consider Mexico, Vietnam, Taiwan, etc.. There is no way these nations can buy enough goods from the USA to even get close to matching what we buy from them. The trade relationship, however, is good for us. We get less expensive items that consumers want. In short, a trade deficit is not in itself bad. Trump has been pushing total bullshit and you clearly continue to buy it.
No, they can't be un-weaned. The cradle to grave welfare states can't even afford to defend themselves anymore. The Royal Navy couldn't beat the Argentine Navy anymore. You have to use "tough love."
Trump stupidly attempted to bomb Iran into regime change. He stupidly got us into a war of choice that now has no clear ending and has placed us and the rest of the world in a worse position. How can you possibly think that the Iran war is good for the USA???
I can't say at this point. We need to see how it ends.
That is complete bullshit.
ChatGPT fact-checking of your claim:
Republicans are to this very day underrepresented. I live in MA which went about 40% for Trump. We don't have a single Republican Rep or Senator.
But worse, you totally ignore that Trump is pushing mid-census gerrymandering as one of his many methods to rig the midterms. You give this slimy con-man a pass ... again!!
It was long overdue as was fixing the voting rights act provision which violated the Constitution.
It is not working.
There are two fundamental things we must do:
Trump clearly is wasting money. Do you recognize that?
Trump clearly is not doing the GDP any favors. Do you recognize that?
You can talk about Trump as if he is actually doing positive things for the nation but the actual facts show otherwise.
As usual, you leap to extreme emotional rhetoric. DEI has good intentions but as is true with any major initiative it is imperfect and is abused. Trump has now gone in the opposite extreme. Do you recognize that??
This is incoherent. I was explaining, yet again, why a trade deficit with a nation is not necessarily bad and is often quite good for the USA.
Good grief man, the lame 'wait and see' bullshit excuse. It is flat out obvious that the Iran war was a mistake. You jump all over Ds if they sneeze without covering their noses but when blatant, outrageous acts by Trump occur, you cannot bring yourself to even the most basic criticism.
Denying the facts yet again. Just professing what you (for whatever reason) believe rather than dealing with cold hard reality.
No, Vic, what is long overdue is preventing gerrymandering! Instead of that, Trump encourages purely partisan gerrymandering. And you condone it!!
If it doesn't work, it will damage his legacy. He can't run again.
DEI has good intentions
So was the war on poverty. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. We need to get back to the system of MERIT.
It is flat out obvious that the Iran war was a mistake.
Are you sure? We have now learned how powerful the terror regime was. You think we should leave them be?
ust professing what you (for whatever reason) believe rather than dealing with cold hard reality.
We have one Republican Senator in all of the New England states. You think that is because those states are overwhelmingly democrat?
No, Vic, what is long overdue is preventing gerrymandering!
If that is your goal, I'm with you. I have a great idea to accomplish that. Let us put AI to the task of forming neutral voting districts from one end of the nation to the other. What say you?
True. And there is no if, it is clearly failing. Further, it is irrational. Do you not see this??
Apparently you do not realize that we have never had a system purely based on merit. If we had, DEI, etc., would never have been necessary. Do you NOT recognize that people of color and women are currently discriminated against in our nation?
Yes, positive. How can you not be?? Trump should have stayed out of it. He has just made matters worse. I support his 2025 efforts to bomb nuclear enrichment facilities (assuming diplomacy had been exhausted). But his 2026 war is demonstrably ill-conceived, illegal, and right now the idiot has no idea how to put the genie back into the bottle and get things back to where they were before the buffoon spent tens of billions of dollars, killed tens of thousands of people, gave Iran the excuse to engage their influence of the Strait and see how everyone reacts (incredibly valuable information for Iran), further alienate our allies, endanger our allies, shoot up the price of crude, etc.
Stop imagining and focus on what is actually happening. Hell, Vic, ¾ of the USA (per polls) recognize the Iran war should never have taken place:
A key problem with your reasoning methodology. You focus on isolated data points rather than considering the big picture. That is like making investment decisions by simply looking at the price difference in a stock and buying if it went up from Tuesday to Wednesday. It is a fundamentally flawed, myopic method.
It does not even take AI. We have had optimization algorithms for almost a century now. It is child's play (algorithmically speaking) to produce cohesive, coherent districts based solely on census. We could have that done almost instantly. No doubt this has already been calculated many times by many people.
The problem is, of course, partisan politics.
Here is a 2020 effort doing what I described:
So calculating proper districts (per the CotUS and not based on partisan politics) is not a problem. The problem is getting partisans to agree to abide by the principles of our Constitution.
I think he's too busy watching the hand he's wishing into to pay attention to the hand Trump is shitting in.
No. I'm not sure who gets the credit, but the attitudes of the vast majority of white Americans changed long ago.
Hell, Vic, ¾ of the USA (per polls) recognize the Iran war should never have taken place:
American foreign policy should never be dictated by polls. FDR wouldn't have been able to forge the "Lend-Lease Act" deal if he was prioritizing public opinion.
You focus on isolated data points rather than considering the big picture.
The dems have redistricted just about as far as possible. That is why they can't respond to what red states are doing.
The problem is getting partisans to agree to abide by the principles of our Constitution.
Redistricting is unconstitutional?
Denying extant racism and other forms of discrimination in the USA is willful ignorance.
Platitude; not the point. The point is that a supermajority of citizens recognize that the Iran war has been a disaster. You have no defense for the war, just deflection like you just posted.
Surely you recognize that the Iran war was a monster mistake by Trump. Why do you refuse to criticize this buffoon?
Again, you deflect. The point is that you focus on mere data point while ignoring the big picture (which contradicts your data points).
Now you employ faux obtuseness. One shit tactic after another rather than deal honestly on these matters.
Here is my full sentence, which is the closing sentence on a description of automated redistricting:
The principles of our Constitution refer to fair practices consistent with representative democracy (per 10 year census) as opposed to elected officials contriving districts to their advantage.
The problem I noted is that automated district calculation has been available for years, but getting partisans to agree to use it (an objective calculation) and to avoid abusing redistricting for partisan advantage is unlikely.
There is plenty of racism, it simply comes via other groups.
Thank you, Nerm_l:
T-Diddy Rump Roast is a Murderer, a CHILD RAPIST, a
convicted FELON, an Adjudicated Rapist, a Con Man, a Compulsive LIAR, a selfish SOB that needs to be thrown into the WORST PRISON in America, and locked up until DEATH DO US PART!
Whatever that vague statement is supposed to mean.
People have been discriminated based on race, ethnicity, appearance, intelligence, beliefs, and gender for all of history. I think societies are getting better at NOT engaging in much of the superficial bigotry, but it still is quite prevalent. Biologically, superficial bigotry is part of our primordial brain ... largely as a self-protection mechanism.
It means that in my lifetime racism in the white community has pretty much been eradicated. However, as we can plainly see, it has been fostered in various minority groups. There are many to blame starting with democrat politicians who use race to win elections.
you are hallucinating
but thanks for crystalizing your beliefs
still crying over 161 year old spilled milk ...
That is a delusional claim. It is demonstrably false.
I believe racism from Caucasian’s has lessened, but you cannot seriously hold that it is anywhere near eradicated.
I think some of you don't know what the real communistic threat was. And I'm talking to those that never put on a uniform
Truth.
The Communist THREAT still comes from Putin's Russia, China, and Kim Jong-Un! It is not from America.
Trump wants to convince his supporters that he alone can see, hear, and know the whereabouts of Communists in the USA.
And, yet Trump has aligned himself with Putin, calls constantly, and is manipulated by "POO TIN", RAVES that he got "LOVE LETTERS" from the ruthless Kim Jong-Un, CLAIMS he has a wonderful relationship with the CHINESE COMMUNIST LEADER, and Orban!
This is what we should be worried about. Not labelling American CITIZENS as Communists to scare folks that the enemy is within.
It is within the WHITE HOUSE.
The real problem in America is woke transgender commies. Ask any maga.
Ask anyone who fled California.
Something you have been proven not to know anything about.
Yes, you've proven that haven't you?
You've proven it. Repeatedly.
some xtian conservative people are still very unhappy that they couldn't move their human property west 175 years ago ...
That, sir, is the BS that "Dirty Diaper Donnie" likes to disseminate, in an attempt to attack any & everyone that doesn't kiss his ORANGE arse.
Woke transgender commies want to eat everyone's pets on Christmas. Watch out!
Shouldn't that read "DEAD LEADER"?
I just received a telepathic phone call from Mitch "The Bitch" McConnell, and he said it is TRUMP that is dead, and he, McConnell, is resting from overwork.
As a registered TRANS-MEDIUM, I get a lot of calls.
elaine isn't about to release mitch's obit to the media yet, because he hasn't been that stiff for the past 30 years ...