╌>

Caitlyn Jenner has infrequently voted. Now she might run for office.

  
Via:  Ender  •  5 years ago  •  36 comments

By:   CARLA MARINUCCI

Caitlyn Jenner has infrequently voted. Now she might run for office.
All told, the reality TV star has voted just nine times in California's 26 statewide elections since 2000.

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



OAKLAND — Reality TV star Caitlyn Jenner has teased the notion of a run for California governor in the anticipated recall election this year, but Los Angeles County records show the Republican did not cast ballots in nearly two-thirds of the elections in which she was eligible to vote since 2000.

Jenner, a 71-year-old political neophyte who has criticized Gov. Gavin Newsom's performance on social media, did not vote in the 2018 gubernatorial election that delivered Newsom the biggest landslide victory for a non-incumbent since 1930. She also did not vote in the historic 2003 recall that ejected then-Democratic Gov. Gray Davis and brought Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger to power, according to records kept by the Los Angeles County Registrar of Voters.

Jenner never cast a ballot in the 2016 elections won by former President Donald Trump — including the GOP primary that anointed him as the party leader and his nail-biting general election contest against Democrat Hillary Clinton.

All told, Jenner has voted just nine times in California's 26 statewide elections since 2000, the records show. Seven of those were statewide general elections, including five presidential contests. The two exceptions were the February 2008 presidential primary and the November 2005 special election featuring several ballot measures backed by Schwarzenegger.

California is almost certain to have its second-ever gubernatorial recall this fall after backers submitted more than 2 million signatures by a deadline last month, hundreds of thousands more than required. County elections officials are still verifying petitions, and an updated count is expected soon.

Jenner may announce as early as this week whether she'll challenge Newsom in a recall election. In a tweet this week, she said, "I am with Californians and will decide soon. I have been here for 45+ years and love CA."

She has met recently with top Republican strategists, including Brad Parscale, who worked as Trump's 2020 re-election campaign manager before departing last July.

Jenner has backed the recall of Newsom on Twitter, saying she is "very proud of the work that Rescue California has done! Californians are fed up with the lack of leadership in Sacramento and it's time to #RecallGavin."

A Jenner representative did not respond to requests for comment about her voting record.

Should she enter the gubernatorial race, Jenner would join other high-profile and ambitious political newcomers who have tried to stake a claim in California with poor voting records — including billionaire former eBay CEO Meg Whitman, who ran for governor in 2010, and former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina, who ran for Senate the same year. Neither were successful in their Republican bids for office.

However, a spotty voting record did not hurt Schwarzenegger. The action-movie star did not participate in five out of 11 statewide elections before the 2003 recall that he won, the San Francisco Chronicle reported that year.

Jenner's voting record "is in keeping with the tradition that celebrity over participation matters more than anything," David McCuan, a political science professor at Sonoma State University.

It also cements the idea "that the recall becomes not a place to move ideas, but a place to move personalities — or move a career."


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Ender
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Ender    5 years ago

Dear people of California, just say no...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Ender @1    5 years ago

some people are willing to do anything to stay in the spotlight.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
2  sandy-2021492    5 years ago

I, for one, have had quite enough of narcissistic reality-show "stars" holding political office.  Marrying and divorcing a Kardashian conveys no qualifications whatsoever.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
2.1  seeder  Ender  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2    5 years ago

She has had some 'republican' views that I don't think align with reality.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
2.1.1  sandy-2021492  replied to  Ender @2.1    5 years ago

Nor with her own life circumstances, one would think.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
2.2  pat wilson  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2    5 years ago
Marrying and divorcing a Kardashian conveys no qualifications whatsoever.

That's Caitlyn's major disqualification, right there.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
3  Tacos!    5 years ago

I can’t fathom why anyone would support this.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
3.1  seeder  Ender  replied to  Tacos! @3    5 years ago

With this and the failed Kanye run...

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
4  seeder  Ender    5 years ago
@Erinsifer
·
Apr 23
I’m a transgender woman, and I #SayNoToJenner . Not because she’s trans, of course. But because she’s an idiot.. and a Republican... like how are you gonna be Trans and run as Republican? Also, remember her MAGA days? I haven’t forgotten.
 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
5  MrFrost    5 years ago

Dems won't vote for her because she's a conservative republican, republicans won't vote for her because she used to be a dude. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5.1  Greg Jones  replied to  MrFrost @5    5 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
6  Kavika     5 years ago

Perhaps the mythical state of Jefferson will vote for her, ya think?

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
6.1  sandy-2021492  replied to  Kavika @6    5 years ago

Can't you just see the sweat pouring off of their foreheads?  Do they vote for the twice-divorced transgender female Republican who defied God's will by transitioning, or for the straight white male Democrat (I'm making assumptions about the Dem nominee here)?

What to do, what to do.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
6.1.1  Kavika   replied to  sandy-2021492 @6.1    5 years ago
What to do, what to do.

Decisions, decisions.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
6.1.3  sandy-2021492  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.2    5 years ago

Good.  Hopefully California Republican are wise enough to reject the narcissistic, unqualified reality star.  Their track record on that score lately has been questionable.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
6.1.5  Gsquared  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.4    5 years ago

The whackiest thing about California are the nutjob Texas transplants living here, and, of course, one or two looney tune freaks hanging out on Redding, CA.  As good Republicans, maybe Jenner has a chance with them.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.1.7  Sean Treacy  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.6    5 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
6.1.9  Gsquared  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.6    5 years ago

After decades of migration from Texas to California, it doesn't mean much that some people living in California, likely mostly people not from California to begin with, are moving to Texas.  We have more than enough people living here.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
6.1.12  Gsquared  replied to  Sean Treacy @6.1.7    5 years ago
survives only because of... entertainment and silicon valley

... and agriculture, tourism, finance, manufacturing, healthcare, education, etc., despite what ideologues might like to propagandize. 

The economy of California is the largest in the U.S. with a $3.2 trillion gross state product as of 2019.  If California was a sovereign nation it would rank as the world's 5th largest economy as of 2019.  

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
6.1.14  Gsquared  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.10    5 years ago
Unless you are very rich, one can't live comfortably on the coast.

Everyone can't live at the beach.  Some beach communities in the state are more affordable than others.

Housing prices in certain areas do represent an affordability issue.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.1.16  Sean Treacy  replied to  Sean Treacy @6.1.7    5 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7  JohnRussell    5 years ago

Maybe running for office was on Bruce Jenner's bucket list.  At 71 years old Caitlin Jenner is a little long in the tooth to be entering politics for the first time. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
7.1  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @7    5 years ago
Maybe running for office was on Bruce Jenner's bucket list. 

That, I applaud - even at his age. But I still think you should start with the school board or a small town city council or something. Heck, it doesn’t even have to be government. He could join a church council, PTA, or local union. Just don’t start with governor of the most populous, largest economy state in the country.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
7.1.1  seeder  Ender  replied to  Tacos! @7.1    5 years ago

Didn't turn out well for Arnold.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
7.1.2  pat wilson  replied to  Ender @7.1.1    5 years ago

He won, didn't he ?

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
7.1.3  seeder  Ender  replied to  pat wilson @7.1.2    5 years ago

Yeah but if I remember correctly, his term wasn't very well received.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
8  arkpdx    5 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
8.1  seeder  Ender  replied to  arkpdx @8    5 years ago

I don't think she is all there mentally but I guarantee you we have different reasons...

I know what your 'thinking' would be on it.

 
 

Who is online





132 visitors