╌>

DOJ agrees to drop any pending tax claims against Trump as part of IRS deal

  
Via:  Gsquared  •  6 months ago  •  46 comments

By:   Ryan J. Reilly (NBC News)

DOJ agrees to drop any pending tax claims against Trump as part of IRS deal
The addendum comes a day after the Justice Department announced that Trump and his co-plaintiffs would drop their $10 billion suit against the IRS.

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche signed an agreement Tuesday declaring the federal government will not seek any sort of audit or payment from the president, his family members and companies on pending tax claims as part of Donald Trump's settlement agreement with the IRS.

In a sweeping one-page addendum to Monday's settlement agreement establishing a nearly $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization" fund, Blanche agreed that the U.S. is "FOREVER BARRED and PRECLUDED from prosecuting or pursuing, any and all claims," including "monetary relief," that "have been or could have been" asserted by the IRS against Trump, his family or his businesses.

The addendum comes a day after the Justice Department announced that Trump and his co-plaintiffs would drop their $10 billion suit against the IRSand the Treasury Department over leaked tax returns, as well asclaims involving the 2022 search of Mar-a-Lago, his Florida home, and the Russian collusion scandal "in exchange" for creating the fund, which the Justice Department said set up a "systematic process to hear and redress claims of others who suffered weaponization and lawfare."

The addendum blocks the U.S. from seeking damages that could have been asserted against the plaintiffs — Trump, his sons Donald Jr. and Eric and their company — as well as other family members and their companies in "any matters currently pending or that could be pending (including tax returns filed before the Effective Date) before Defendants or other agencies or departments."

The "effective date" would be May 18, the date the settlement was signed. The addendum does not specify which other agencies or departments it is referring to.

A spokesperson for the Justice Department said the agreement is "only with respect to existing audits, not future."

The settlement and addendum were agreed to before a court-ordered deadline for this week that would have required the administration answer questions about the president's IRS lawsuit given his control over the Justice Department.

U.S. District Judge Kathleen M. Williams, who was presiding over the case, ordered the matter closed Monday after the Trumps moved to dismissed their suit.

Rep. Richard Neal of Massachusetts, the top Democrat on the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, said in a statement Tuesday that Trump has "turned the federal government into his personal protection racket."

"This settlement is corruption in the plainest sight: forcing IRS to abandon every audit, past and present, into Trump, his family, and their businesses while steering $1.8 billion in taxpayer dollars toward his friends, cronies, and Trump-affiliated companies is self-dealing at its most grotesque," the statement said.

"It's a dark, dark day for our democracy."


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that are known plagiarists, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt/deflect the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.  Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.  Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion. Use of the terms "leftist" or "lefty" will also be subject to deletion. ©


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Gsquared    6 months ago

Not only does Trump get a nearly $1.8 billion Thug Fund to pay off his criminal supporters, which will remain entirely secret, all of his and his family's tax fraud gets a free pass.  Signed off on behalf of the U.S. government by Trump's personal attorney.

Corrupt much?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Gsquared @1    6 months ago

Trump belongs in jail. It is a failure of our system that he is not. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Gsquared @1    6 months ago

I just want to go cut a bitch right now. I cannot stand the blatant corruption going on and Congress does nothing about it

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.1  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2    6 months ago

mike lindell says he deserves $400 million of it ...

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.2  Ozzwald  replied to  devangelical @1.2.1    6 months ago

mike lindell says he deserves $400 million of it ...

How much will be going to the 1/9'ers?

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.3  Ozzwald  replied to  devangelical @1.2.1    6 months ago
mike lindell says he deserves $400 million of it ...

Just realized something that would really stick in Trump's craw.  If this goes through, with specific conditions attached, James Comey and Letitia James might qualify...  Not to mention Hunter Biden.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.2.4  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  devangelical @1.2.1    6 months ago
mike lindell says he deserves $400 million of it

That seems appropriate.  If anyone deserves it he certainly does.  What a great guy.  Maybe he should get all $1.8 billion.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.5  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @1.2.4    6 months ago

you can bet his girlfriend tina peters will be going after a big traitor bonus, now that her sentence was commuted. she allegedly can't vote during the run of her original 9 year prison sentence, but smart money says she'll make a big production of trying to vote in the midterms, which would be in character for a brain dead maga republican with no respect for the law. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @1    6 months ago

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.4  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @1    5 months ago

looks like this is going back to court in june ...

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.4.2  devangelical  replied to  Split Personality @1.4.1    5 months ago

trump took 3 judicial broadsides on friday ... bummer ...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2  TᵢG    6 months ago

How is it possible that any adult with a functioning brain NOT see this blatant corruption?

Trump seems to think he can get away with anything.   He might be right given the sycophants in GOPTRUMP control Congress and refuse to hold him accountable or constrain him.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
3  seeder  Gsquared    6 months ago

It turns out this could be saving Trump more than $100 million in tax penalties.  Maybe far more.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4  TᵢG    6 months ago

Seems to me that the next administration, assuming we return to an ethical DoJ, could nullify this DoJ deal.   Can what one DoJ decides be overturned by a subsequent DoJ?

That is, on what legal theory does this DoJ deal depend?   Seems it should never be legally possible to do this without normal due process.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
4.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  TᵢG @4    6 months ago

The purpose of the fund is to pay for and build Trump's private insurrection militia for his planned 2028 coup attempt.

I just heard a Republican Congressman say they are going to kill the fund.  No Republican member of Congress, Senate or House, has said they support it.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.1.1  TᵢG  replied to  Gsquared @4.1    6 months ago

One can only hope that this blatant corruption is high enough for the spineless GOPTRUMP to finally act.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.2  devangelical  replied to  TᵢG @4.1.1    6 months ago

I'm afraid that would defy a well established party trajectory this century, but I can appreciate the eternal optimism ...

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
4.1.3  evilone  replied to  Gsquared @4.1    6 months ago
No Republican member of Congress, Senate or House, has said they support it.

The DC LEOs on J6 have already filed suite.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  Gsquared @4.1    6 months ago
No Republican member of Congress, Senate or House, has said they support it.

finally! A fucking backbone has emerged!

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.5  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.4    6 months ago

meh, they'll all cower and submit once it gets put to a vote ...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.1.6  TᵢG  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.4    6 months ago

Maybe

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.7  Trout Giggles  replied to  TᵢG @4.1.6    6 months ago

you're a cool customer

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
4.1.8  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  TᵢG @4.1.6    6 months ago
Maybe

I agree.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.2  Split Personality  replied to  TᵢG @4    6 months ago

He's 80 and sees his own failing health growing.

He and his team are just trying to bulldoze the Judicial system with increasingly desperate hoaxs and schemes to see what might squeek through.

This is his entertainment. 

He's just fucking with all of us.  even the GOP

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.2.1  TᵢG  replied to  Split Personality @4.2    6 months ago

I agree.

Trump is dangerous.   He is a psychopath, and he really has nothing to lose.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4.2.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Split Personality @4.2    6 months ago

Trollimus Maximus.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.2.3  Split Personality  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.2.2    6 months ago

Wasn't that the nick name for Bigus Dickis in that Monty Python move?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5  Tacos!    6 months ago

There is no defense for this crime.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
5.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Tacos! @5    6 months ago

If it can be construed to be an "official act" the immunity the Supreme Court granted him would apply.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.1.1  Tacos!  replied to  Gsquared @5.1    6 months ago

That has to be based on the Constitution, if I remember the opinion correctly. And there is nothing in the Constitution that gives him - or the Executive branch - the authority to create funds to pay out taxpayer money to random people. That power lies with the Congress.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
5.1.2  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Tacos! @5.1.1    6 months ago

Even if that's the case, don't you think the Republican Supreme Court will find a loophole for their Dear Leader?

Instead of reviewing the entire decision, I found this:

AI Overview

In the landmark Trump v. United States ruling, the Supreme Court established that former U.S. presidents possess absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within their core constitutional powers, and at least presumptive immunity for all other official acts. (Emphasis added)
Core Constitutional Authority: A former president is entitled to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority (e.g., appointing ambassadors, issuing pardons).
Other Official Acts: A former president is entitled to presumptive immunity for all official acts. To prosecute these, the government must overcome this presumption by proving that criminalizing the act would not pose a danger of intruding on the authority and functions of the Executive Branch.
 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
6  Hal A. Lujah    6 months ago

Shocking that no rwnjs are commenting here!  Could it be that Trump has finally offended his sycophantic dumbass hardcore base?!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6    6 months ago

Of course not! They know they can't defend it intelligently

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1.1  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1    6 months ago

they're waiting on a more plausible explanation from maga command central ...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.2  TᵢG  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6    6 months ago

Yet it will not matter.

They will still support him.

One would have thought that every rational mind would have rejected Trump as unfit after he tried to steal the 2020 election.   That should have been the decisive crossing of the line.  Given that was not the case and almost 80 million people still voted for that abysmal human being to be PotUS, there is no sense to be made of those minds.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.2.1  devangelical  replied to  TᵢG @6.2    6 months ago

at this point they're well beyond recovery and rehabilitation, it's time to pull the plug on them ...

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
6.2.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  TᵢG @6.2    6 months ago

I’d like to think that there has to be a line that Trump cannot cross without turning off his base.  Unfortunately, that line is probably Trump becoming a Democrat.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.2.3  devangelical  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6.2.2    6 months ago

... uh yeah, he'd be welcomed with open arms. not. give him a few more months to take more of the maga morons over the cliff with him ...

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
6.2.4  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6.2.2    6 months ago
Trump becoming a Democrat

We don't want him.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
6.2.5  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Gsquared @6.2.4    5 months ago
We don't want him.

Democrats had him and many other white conservative Christian bigots for years. But as the democratic party moved further from white conservative Christian values like maintaining the status quo of "keeping sweet" aka the continued but unspoken forms of segregation and racist policies (can also be used for the way white conservative Christian women are supposed to act), those former Democrats moved to where white conservative Christians felt celebrated and special again which was among the new Republican party that had turned nearly albino over the last fifty years.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
6.3  Split Personality  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6    6 months ago

It's got to be hard to defend a DOJ and FBI that has actively retaliated against anyone and everyone whoever investigated the former and current POTUS.

It's the ultimate in gaslighting that his supporters that ran afoul of the law would now be able to claim "lawfare" as an excuse for financial relief while tens of thousands of federal workers wonder where their relief is, having been targeted as supporting Fauci, Biden, Obama or any poor NSA or FBI professional involved in investigations of Trump in the last 12 years. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
6.3.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Split Personality @6.3    6 months ago

But I read that it doesn’t matter if you’re a republican or a democrat, you’re all eligible for a financial reward to warm you up to your new daddy.  The most naked crime - taking the money the government demanded of you, and using it to blatantly shower back money for influence.  What a sleaze. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.3.2  devangelical  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6.3.1    5 months ago

collusion by POS/POTUS with the DOJ to perpetrate a fraud upon the court is an impeachable offense ...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.3  TᵢG  replied to  devangelical @6.3.2    5 months ago
... collusion by POS/POTUS with the DOJ to perpetrate a fraud upon the court is an impeachable offense ...

Hell.   Add it to the list.

Trump got away with trying to steal the 2020 election with fraud, coercion, lying, and incitement.   It does not matter what he does if the spineless fucks in Congress do not hold him accountable.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
7  JBB    6 months ago

Now this, this right here, is downright DEPLORABLE!

 
 

Who is online










95 visitors