╌>

Vance peddles Watergate nonsense as White House tries to rewrite Nixon-era scandal

  
Via:  Gsquared  •  5 months ago  •  36 comments

By:   Steve Benen (MS NOW)

Vance peddles Watergate nonsense as White House tries to rewrite Nixon-era scandal
What the vice president described was more an indictment of our twisted political culture and less a credible effort to downplay Watergate's seriousness.

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


For those who support the integrity of the historical record, especially as it relates to Richard Nixon's Watergate scandal, it has been an unfortunate week. In fact, it was earlier this week when Ed Martin, Donald Trump's highly controversial U.S. pardon attorney, published a bizarre item to social media, arguing that the scandal was a "hoax" orchestrated in part by the CIA.

Martin added, "The only thing worse than the lying CIA is the two-faced liar John Dean [who served as Nixon's White House counsel] and the fiction-writer [Bob] Woodward. May they suffer in eternity."

The Republican activist's claims were ridiculous, but hours later they were nevertheless endorsed by Monica Crowley, a former Fox News personality who currently serves as the Trump administration's chief of protocol. "President Nixon was the target of a Deep State hoax," Crowley wrote online while referencing Martin's tweet. "He will be vindicated."

Days later, JD Vance appeared at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum in California, where the vice president kept the rhetorical campaign going.


JD Vance: "I think Nixon's historical legacy is enjoying a bit of a renaissance, and deservedly so. I joked that if Watergate happened tomorrow, it would be like a 12 hours news story. The idea that it took down a presidency is crazy."
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com)2026-06-25T21:03:32.010Z

After arguing that Nixon's legacy is "enjoying a bit of a renaissance," the Ohio Republican said, "As I joked … backstage, if Watergate happened tomorrow, it would be, like, a 12-hour news story. The idea that it would have taken down a presidency is crazy."

As part of the same comments, Vance argued in apparent seriousness, "If you look at the story of how the deep state took down Richard Nixon, it's not all that different from what the same groups of people, the same institutions, tried to do to Donald Trump in the first Trump administration."

There are a few ways to look at comments like these.

First, the idea that Watergate wouldn't have endured as a major political scandal may very well be true. In 1973 and 1974, there were still a significant number of congressional Republicans willing to turn against a corrupt Republican president in the face of overwhelming evidence; major media outlets aligned with the White House didn't really exist; and it was an era in which there was greater accountability for political wrongdoing.

But what the vice president described was more an indictment of our twisted political culture and less a credible effort to downplay the seriousness of Watergate.

Second, the idea that Nixon was brought down by nefarious government insiders who plotted against him is plainly bonkers. We have, after all, heard the tapes. Nixon chose to engage in systemic abuses. His crimes were his own, not the fault of "the deep state," whether Vance chooses to acknowledge reality or not.

Historian and journalist Garrett Graff, who wrote one of the defining books about Watergate, described Vance's comments as "shockingly a-historical" and an "immature understanding of what Watergate was and wasn't."


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that are known plagiarists, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt/deflect the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.  Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.  Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion. Use of the terms "leftist" or "lefty" will also be subject to deletion. ©


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Gsquared    5 months ago

Compared to the scandals and abuses of the corrupt, traitorous Trumpist regime, Nixon almost does look less villainous, but not by much.

Vance is a deviant.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @1    5 months ago

you'd think it would be easier for them to vilify nixon vs trump, and I'm afraid jd's only hope of gaining higher office is to inherit it ... 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.1.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  devangelical @1.1    5 months ago

The good news is that the smarmy creep Vance has no chance of ever being elected President.  

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @1.1.1    5 months ago

I hope he and his family enjoy their new lives in india ...

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.1.3  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  devangelical @1.1.2    5 months ago

They don't want him there.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
1.1.4  Thomas  replied to  Gsquared @1.1.1    5 months ago

The good news is that the smarmy creep Vance has no chance of ever being elected President.  

If he does inherit the Presidency and stands for election, I am thinking that he will make moves towards declaring election results invalid, tainted and /or otherwise spoiled in an attempt to remain in power, per his mentor.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Gsquared @1.1.1    5 months ago

I dont see independents going for Vance. 

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
1.1.6  Thomas  replied to  Gsquared @1.1.3    5 months ago

We do not really appreciate him here, either.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.1.7  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Thomas @1.1.6    5 months ago

Not in the least.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.1.8  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.5    5 months ago

When Trump is done that's the end of Vance's political career.  He is completely ruined by his close association with the worst, least popular President ever, and he's done plenty on his own to make himself unacceptable.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.9  devangelical  replied to  Thomas @1.1.4    4 months ago
he will make moves towards declaring election results invalid, tainted and /or otherwise spoiled in an attempt to remain in power, per his mentor

maga sycophants seem to have learned to excel at not only breaking the law, and also for a large part, to successfully obstruct the legal processes to punish them for it ...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.10  devangelical  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.5    4 months ago
I dont see independents going for Vance. 

and most of maga can't stand him ...

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    5 months ago

They want to normalize the Trump crowd's criminal behavior. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
2.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  JohnRussell @2    5 months ago

That is exactly what it is.  A PR stunt.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2  devangelical  replied to  JohnRussell @2    5 months ago

it seems that immunity from prosecution and jail time for criminal activities is a long standing perk of imperial presidencies ...

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  JohnRussell @2    5 months ago
They want to normalize the Trump crowd's criminal behavior. 

Exactly. And to do that, they have to try and make Nixon the victim of the fantasy bogey man "deep state" that some incredibly stupid people apparently still believe in. I mean, these folk aren't just stupid, they're total lunatic conspiracy theory believers that are a danger to themselves and others. But you can't really expect them to stay sane after having their heads shoved up Trumps ass for so long.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
3  Buzz of the Orient    5 months ago

My most favourite Canadian Prime MInister, Pierre Elliott Trudeau,despised Nixon.  But then, to be fair, I suppose we shouldn't forget Monica Lewinsky, eh?

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
3.1  Thomas  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @3    5 months ago

With all due respect, Buzz, I fail to see the connection between proven criminal actions and a blow job.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.1  devangelical  replied to  Thomas @3.1    5 months ago

there isn't one ...

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
3.1.2  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Thomas @3.1    5 months ago

With all due respect, Thomas, neither Nixon nor Clinton were charged with committing a criminal act, but what each did was scandalous.  The point of my comment is that it is hypocritical and prejudicial to name a President of one party for committing a scandalous act when Presidents of BOTH parties did so. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
3.1.3  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @3.1.2    4 months ago

Nixon was saved from criminal prosecution by Ford's pardon.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
3.1.4  Thomas  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @3.1.2    4 months ago

So are you trying to derail the article with a whataboutism? I don't recall Clinton being mentioned.

The article was about the VP trying to whitewash what Nixon did by blaming it on some hallucinatory and bogus deep-state conspiracy. Clinton does not enter into the discussion of the conspiracy theory Vance was trying to push. Clinton at the time of the Watergate break-in was at Yale Law School.

If you have information connecting Clinton to the Watergate break-in, cover-up, subsequent investigation and resignation to avoid impeachment, then by all means, post it.  

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
3.1.5  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Thomas @3.1.4    4 months ago

Well, somehow I thought corruption by an American President was the topic.  My not being an American might explain why I'm not quite so biased as an American might be on an American political topic. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.6  devangelical  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @3.1.2    4 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.1.8  Trout Giggles  replied to  Thomas @3.1.4    4 months ago
So are you trying to derail the article with a whataboutism?

Good thing I'm not the author of this seed. I don't put up with derails

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.9  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.1.8    4 months ago

we'll probably be dealing with the fallout from a recent public humiliation for awhile ...

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4  Hal A. Lujah    5 months ago

Watching this weenie get publicly shunned by other foreign dignitaries is hilarious.  (sorry buzz, it’s YouTube)

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
4.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4    5 months ago

Sorry, I'm afraid to thank you for being considerate, cause it will probably be deleted for being off topic or no value. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.1  devangelical  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @4.1    5 months ago

please stay on topic and take your meta elsewhere if you wish to participate in this group.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.2  TᵢG  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4    5 months ago

I hope Trump watches the Daily Show.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
4.2.1  Thomas  replied to  TᵢG @4.2    5 months ago

It would tie him in knots

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5  Tacos!    5 months ago
"If you look at the story of how the deep state took down Richard Nixon

You have to be deeply ignorant or insane to think “the deep state” took down Richard Nixon.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
5.1  Thomas  replied to  Tacos! @5    5 months ago

You have to be deeply ignorant or insane to think “the deep state” took down Richard Nixon.

These are the depths that the current administration has dived to. Actually, they started out pretty low to begin with....

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
5.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Tacos! @5    5 months ago
You have to be deeply ignorant or insane to think “the deep state” took down Richard Nixon.

"We won with poorly educated. I love the poorly educated," - Donald Trump

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6  Trout Giggles    4 months ago
First, the idea that Watergate wouldn't have endured as a major political scandal may very well be true. In 1973 and 1974, there were still a significant number of congressional Republicans willing to turn against a corrupt Republican president in the face of overwhelming evidence; major media outlets aligned with the White House didn't really exist; and it was an era in which there was greater accountability for political wrongdoing.

The most important take of this seed. 55 years ago, character mattered

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
7  devangelical    4 months ago

 
 

Who is online






Dismayed Patriot


123 visitors