╌>

Beginning to Look Like It’s Time to Invent Another Internet

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  5 years ago  •  63 comments

By:   Martha Boneta

Beginning to Look Like It’s Time to Invent Another Internet
He reportedly “doesn’t like how groups like Facebook, Google, and Amazon have effectively centralized the Internet, nor how they control people’s data.” So, he’s taken a sabbatical from MIT to work on a project whose platform is designed to be independent like the early days of the internet and to resist control by the tech oligarchs who now control the worldwide web. And not a moment too soon.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

This is indeed good news.  It’s part of a multifaceted effort to disengage from big tech and fund alternatives that they and their gate keepers and government can not control.  We will not be second class citizens on big tech.  We will isolate and find our own alternatives that they can’t control. The links in this seed are great.  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



3b844d84-4611-4fc7-944d-88811e8982c5-500x250.jpg

Source: Henry Thomas/World Wide Web Foundation via AP

Tim Berners-Lee, the man who invented the Internet, has become frustrated with its current state and the restrictions major corporations have placed upon the once-free environment—and he’s decided to do something about it.

He reportedly “doesn’t like how groups like Facebook, Google, and Amazon have effectively centralized the Internet, nor how they control people’s data.” So, he’s taken a sabbatical from MIT to work on a project whose platform is designed to be independent like the early days of the internet and to resist control by the tech oligarchs who now control the worldwide web.

And not a moment too soon.

Just since the regrettable riot at the U.S. Capitol last Wednesday, Twitter and Facebook have  shut down President Trump’s accounts for “inciting violence.”

Amazon and Apple have joined to  force Parler, a social media app widely used by conservatives already fed up with Twitter and Facebook censorship, off their platforms. It now has to reconfigure its own site and move it to new servers still unidentified. Other social media apps considered safe havens for conservatives, such as Gab and MeWe, have  had their traffic curtailed or throttled .

The political director of ABC News  called for a “cleansing” of Trump supporters. Jennifer Rubin of the Washington Post  says those who support lifting the ban on Trump’s Twitter account “are loyal to him, not the Constitution” and wrote that anyone who doesn’t support the jailing of Trump’s 80 million supporters is  “complicit” in sedition.

What they tell us as they reduce conservatives’ followers, ban communications, and kick them off their platforms is that they are frightened of the right’s message, concerned about their numbers and fearful for their agenda.

Facebook, Twitter, Apple, Amazon and other tech giants  are privately owned and can do what they want with their platforms , we are told. Never mind that government promoted the growth of these businesses, created the platform on which they do business and stood clear in a regulatory sense while they built dominant worldwide companies based on the understanding that they were allowing all Americans to express themselves, they might not occupy the legal high ground they think they do.

Vivek Ramaswamy and Jed Rubenfeld  wrote in the Wall Street Journal that Google, Facebook and Twitter should be “treated as state actors under existing legal doctrines” because they have been “co-opted” by Congress to “do through the back door what government cannot directly accomplish under the Constitution.”

They  cited the case of Rep. Cedric Raymond, D-La., who is set to work in the Biden White House, telling Facebook and Google in 2019 they “better” restrict speech he deemed harmful or face regulation, and Sen. Dick Blumenthal, D-Conn., attributing the recent crackdown on Trump and his allies to a “shift in the political winds.”

Should government demand these companies allow access to all on their platforms, especially given they are protected from liability by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act? How can courts order that President Trump not be allowed to block any Twitter followers but then allow Twitter to shut down his account?

Those are the kinds of questions that trouble Berners-Lee.  Under what he calls Inrupt , users’ data is stored in a pod they control, rather than on Google’s servers, where it can be sold to others and withdrawn at the whims of the company.

As was the case with his work on the first internet, Berners-Lee is not interested in making money on his development, but he does plan to travel the globe when it goes live to help web developers understand how to make apps that will work on his new platform.

It’s unfortunate Berners-Lee has to do this. But the expectation was that Twitter, Facebook and the others would take advantage of the freedom afforded by the internet and leave it as free as they found it. This has not happened.

President Trump is not the cause of this but merely the catalyst. It is those on the right who are the intended victims. And if we don’t stand up now, it won’t be long before we have lost the opportunity to do so.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
3  Dismayed Patriot    5 years ago

You guys going to re-invent the wheel too because none of your former friends will give you rides anymore?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4  JohnRussell    5 years ago

Trump's use of twitter is EASILY, one of the most embarrassing things ever to happen to the United States of America by a prominent figure (indeed the most prominent figure of his time) . 

Now it seems, conservatives want to be fed more of this crap. 

There is no accounting for taste. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
5  Gsquared    5 years ago

When you live in alternative universe with alternative facts, you might as well dream of an alternative internet, too.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
5.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Gsquared @5    5 years ago
When you live in alternative universe with alternative facts, you might as well dream of an alternative internet, too.

I think that many conservatives view it like a reverse of the times they thought were the greatest in America, you know, back when they could patronize whites only restaurants. Now they feel like the internet has "Liberals only" signs up that exclude them, but the reality is they're more like "No masturbating in the restaurant" signs and they see that and go "Awwww! But I can't help cranking one out when eating hamburgers! When will they have inclusive restaurants that let me do whatever I want?!". All the current social media companies are asking of them is to not push violent hate speech or insane demonstrably false conspiracy theories about others and they're like "Awwwww! But I can't help but call my Democrat neighbor a baby eating communist who needs to be hung! When will they have inclusive social media companies that let me do whatever I want?!"...

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
5.2.1  SteevieGee  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.2    5 years ago

Just don't you dare breastfeed your baby in my wanking restaurant.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
7  Ender    5 years ago

They already have one. It's called the dark web.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
7.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Ender @7    5 years ago

They want to create a White Web.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
7.1.1  Ender  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @7.1    5 years ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
7.1.2  Kavika   replied to  Hal A. Lujah @7.1    5 years ago

Sheets optional

 
 

Who is online

evilone
Sean Treacy


103 visitors