╌>

Jen Psaki Doesn’t Just Want Biden Critics Banned from One Social Platform, But ‘All’ Social Platforms

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  5 years ago  •  43 comments

By:   Kyle Becker

Jen Psaki Doesn’t Just Want Biden Critics Banned from One Social Platform, But ‘All’ Social Platforms
One day after causing a stir by admitting the U.S. government was colluding with Facebook to silence purported COVID ‘misinformation,’ White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki took it a step further. You could even call it a ‘great leap forward’ for Big Tech censorship in America.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

This is so typical of our fascist regime and it’s mainstream media and big tech social media lackeys!  Here is blatant proof that big tech social media is willingly acting as an agent of the government in order to censor the free speech rights of ordinary Americans and alternative media when we say something that they don’t want to be heard.  We are living in the beginning of dystopian times courtesy of the government and its big tech social media and lamestream news media useful idiots.  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Jen Psaki Doesn’t Just Want Biden Critics Banned from One Social Platform, But ‘All’ Social Platforms



by Kyle Becker 22 minutes ago


One day after causing a stir by admitting the U.S. government was colluding with Facebook to silence purported COVID ‘misinformation,’ White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki took it a step further.

You could even call it a ‘great leap forward’ for Big Tech censorship in America.

Watch:

This iframe is not allowed

🤬

“As I noted yesterday… there are more steps that everyone can take and I would note again this is the responsibility of officials speaking, of course, on behalf of the government, it’s the responsibility of members of the media, it’s the responsibility of citizens and civic leaders and people who are trusted voices in communities around the country,” Psaki said.

“That has a broad definition,” she added. “Social media platforms are one of them. There are also areas where a lot of people get news and information. Sometimes they are accurate news items, reported by some of your outlets or accurate information shared by a neighbor. Sometimes there is information that is not.”

“This is not a new issue but it is an issue that is impacting people’s lives,” she continued. “So, a couple of the steps that could be constructive for the public health of the country are, providing for Facebook or other platforms to measure and publicly share the impact of misinformation on their platform, and the audience is reaching.”

“Also with the public, all of you, to create robust enforcement strategies that provide transparency about rules,” Psaki said. “You should not be banned from one platform and not others if you are providing misinformation out there.”

“Taking faster action against harmful posts. Information travels quite quickly,” she continued. “If it is up there for days and days and days, it is hard to put that back in a box. And of course promoting quality information. Algorithms, I don’t know how they work, but they know how they work.”

“Those are some of the steps we think could be constructive for public health, public information, and the right of the public to know,” Psaki said.


Psaki, ironically, also called the social media platforms “public platforms.”

On Thursday, Psaki disclosed that the White House is “in regular touch with social media platforms” to censor what they deem is ‘misinformation.’

“We are in regular touch with the social media platforms and those engagements typically happen through members of our senior staff and also members of our COVID-19 team — given, as Dr. Murthy conveyed, this is a big issue, of misinformation, specifically on the pandemic,” Psaki explained.

It is hard to overstate how seriously dangerous the U.S. government colluding with corporations to censor critics of the party or its policies is to the free speech and freedom of the press rights of American citizens. It is something one might expect from China, or even communist Cuba.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2  JBB    5 years ago

If by "Biden Critics" you mean psyops level foreign propaganda and disinformation crafted to mislead, divide and inflame Americans in order to harm us, 

then, YES! Nobody should give that crap a platform!

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.2  Split Personality  replied to  JBB @2    5 years ago

This kind of drivel from Kyle Becker is why Trending Politics is listed as Questionable Source by MBFC.

The Headline is just to attract attention and is not supported by the article

without using a tin foil hat inverter to "read between the lines".

Kyle is a partisan catastrophizer, all panic, no substance.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
2.2.3  Gsquared  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.2    5 years ago

Your description of her comments is a total falsehood.  Your comment is 180 degrees opposite from the truth.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
2.2.4  Gsquared  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.1    5 years ago

The criticism of the author and source of the article is appropriate, right on point and highlights the utter lack of value of the truly pathetic propaganda piece.

Trumpists' primary modus operandi is to attempt to disrupt and derail.  For example, disruption and derailment will, of course, be their sole objective if any Trumpists are appointed as members of the Select Committee to study the January 6th Trumpist insurrection.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.2.8  Split Personality  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.7    5 years ago
Kyle is a great American.  

He is an American who makes a living spreading biased political gossip, conspiracies and have truths while hiding behind the 1st Amendment.

He’s not a progressive left American.

Obviously or he would be working at a more reputable news "source". Objectivity is not one of his strengths.

And yes the two are mutually exclusive.

Agree to Disagree.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.2.9  Split Personality  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.1    5 years ago

Can you point out where in the article Biden critics are mentioned?

Psaki and others are sick of the misinformation being spread on social media.

If it's keeping people from getting vaccinated, it's a threat to public safety.

Have you seen the sincerity with which people are testifying that the vaccine made them or others magnetic?

Be careful who you root for on this.

Lot's of red state residents, may not be here to vote Republican in 2022 or 2024

if they insist on remaining unvaccinated.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.2.10  Split Personality  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.2    5 years ago

I know it's a big ask, but IF you could read it objectively, I believe you would get her point.

 
 

Who is online

shona1
Freefaller


222 visitors