╌>

White House not stolen, but bought with Zuckerberg's money: Goodwin

  
Via:  Vic Eldred  •  3 years ago  •  21 comments

By:   Michael Goodwin (New York Post)

White House not stolen, but bought with Zuckerberg's money: Goodwin
Nearly a year has passed since the 2020 election, yet there has not been a clear, satisfactory answer to the central mystery: How did a dull, declining Joe...

Leave a comment to auto-join group Americana

Americana


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Nearly a year has passed since the 2020 election, yet there has not been a clear, satisfactory answer to the central mystery: How did a dull, declining Joe Biden manage to get more than 81 million votes and win the presidency?

After all, Biden spent most of the pandemic-laced campaign in his Delaware basement and his appearances were marked by sparse crowds and signs he had lost more than a step. Yet he flipped five states Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, including Georgia and Arizona, and racked up 306 electoral votes to Donald Trump's 232.

Trump offers his own answer, of course, declaring incessantly that the election was stolen. His efforts to get then-Vice President Mike Pence to block certification of results and the Jan. 6 Capitol riot have made his arguments out of bounds for most Americans.

Numerous courts rejected claims made by Trump lawyers involving manipulation of voting machines, bags of secret ballots emerging and other kinds of alleged fraud.

But rejecting Trump's claims is one thing, solving the riddle of Biden's triumph is another. Lacking any other explanation, two-thirds of Republicans still believe "the election was rigged and stolen from Trump," while only 18 percent believe "Joe Biden won fair and square," according to a recent Yahoo News/YouGov survey. It found that 28 percent of independent voters agree Biden's victory is illegitimate.

Such wide suspicions are corrosive, which makes the findings of a new book all the more important.

In "Rigged," author Mollie Hemingway lays out what amounts to a fascinating alternative to the "stolen" charge. She presents a strong case that the $419 million that Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg ostensibly spent to get out the vote was actually used by Democrat activists to infiltrate local election operations and take over jobs government workers were supposed to do.

Hemingway, a senior editor at The Federalist and a Fox commentator, shows how two Zuckerberg nonprofits used their unprecedented deep pockets to line up left-wing groups in key cities that in turn hired poll workers, collected absentee ballots and cured those with errors.

In Green Bay, Wis., the Democratic mayor outsourced the planning and managing of the election to these activists. Hemingway cites an e-mail from the mayor's chief of staff saying, "I am taking all of my cues" from one of the Zuckerberg groups.

The city clerk, nominally in charge of the election, was reportedly unhappy with the changes, went on leave shortly before election day and soon resigned.

As Hemingway puts it in excerpts published by The Post, "It was a genius plan. And because no one ever imagined that a coordinated operation could pull off the privatization of the election system, no laws were built to combat it."

Texas researcher William Doyle crunched the numbers showing how the nonprofits concentrated in areas Biden won, often spending three or four times as much money per voter as they spent in districts Trump won.

"The 2020 election wasn't stolen," Doyle concluded. "It was likely bought by one of the world's wealthiest and most powerful men pouring his money through legal loopholes."

He also tracks the Zuckerberg groups' promotion of universal mail-in voting, the push for unlocked and unwatched drop boxes and extended deadlines.

The pandemic played a major role in many ways, with health fears leading most states to loosen safeguards. But in swing states, left-wing groups outraged by Trump's 2016 upset of Clinton started plotting early for 2020 and were able to piggyback on the pandemic fears to go even further.

Zuckerberg's donations were used in key cities to help get President Joe Biden elected.EPA/TASOS KATOPODIS / POOL

In Pennsylvania, activists had done an end-run around the sleepy Republican Legislature by suing to eliminate protections and getting a Democratic governor to sign a consent decree. A Democratic-heavy state Supreme Court approved it.

In Georgia, a Republican governor signed a consent decree on signatures pushed by Democratic activist Stacey Abrams.

The US Supreme Court made noises about the Constitution's delegation of power on state elections to legislatures, but never made a major ruling.

Coming on top of how Zuckerberg's Facebook suppressed The Post's report on Hunter Biden, Hemingway's book deserves wide attention, especially from Trump and the GOP.

Although her findings do not mean there was no voter fraud, she offers a more substantive and documented explanation than the "stolen" argument, which remains a political dead-end outside of Trump's core Republican base.

Party leaders hoping to take back Congress in next year's midterms would do well to understand the details of how Dems pulled off swing-state victories for Biden.

In some ways, the breakthrough recalls the big leaps in the use of technology Barack Obama's campaign featured in 2008. In both cases, the intense collection of granular data, combined with armies of young people using it, won the day by turning out targeted voters.

As Hemingway notes, the 2020 effort also broke new ground in having activists replace government workers for election jobs, which made the use of data more efficient. One measure is that the 159 million votes cast represent nearly 67 percent of the eligible population, making the turnout percentage the highest in 120 years, according to the Council on Foreign Relations.

Although Trump doesn't have trouble raising money, his campaigns did not feature strong ground games. Both of his races were built around his personality and rallies, which drew enormous crowds. He won more than 74 million votes last year, an increase of 10 million over his 2016 tally, and he sounds very much like a 2024 candidate.

But Biden's victory exposed the limits of his approach, and now we have a good picture of how Dems did it.

Tellingly, Republicans are furious at what Hemingway uncovered and promise investigations and legislation.

All well and good, but chances they will succeed before the midterms are almost nil. For example, the GOP-led Legislature in Wisconsin passed a bill banning private funding of state operations, but the Democratic governor vetoed it.

So until further notice, Zuck's Bucks remain the coin of the political realm.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

Today the honors go to Michael Goodwin for a breakdown of the Hemingway book on the 2020 election.

The question posed in the first paragrah needs to be answered.  The actions of Mark Zuckerberg were evil let legal. There are too many loopholes in our election laws and the powerful left has too much time to plan and scheme.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    3 years ago

Biden got 81 million votes because people were sick and fucking tired of Donald Trump. Case closed.

It is a shame a lot of right wingers are too stupid to understand that. 

Trump is so damn dumb he has incessantly said that he knows he won because he got more votes than any incumbent president ever has before.  You dont win by getting more votes than any incumbent ever has before, you win by getting more votes than the person you are running against. 

It is incredibly easy to match vote totals to the number of registered voters. A high turnout is not the basis for a conspiracy theory. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2    3 years ago
Biden got 81 million votes because people were sick and fucking tired of Donald Trump.

Well if they did, they must hate themselves now!



A high turnout is not the basis for a conspiracy theory. 

Having activists replace government workers for election jobs isn't a conspiracy theory.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @2    3 years ago
Biden got 81 million votes because people were sick and fucking tired of Donald Trump.

And according to the latest polls, many now seem to see the error in electing Joe Biden and Kamala Harris to any office.

Thankfully, we have history to show us how the President's party gets hammered in the midterms when the President sucks.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2    3 years ago

And thankfully, we have people who are getting to the bottom of what happened in 2020.

This was the story of the week!

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @2    3 years ago
It is a shame a lot of right wingers are too stupid to understand that.

This is rich coming from somebody who STILL puts up the hoaxes and propaganda daily here on NT.

Trump is so damn dumb...

That he was more successful in politics in 4 years than Biden has been in 50.  But then again a rotting corpse could be more successful than Biden.

Let's go Brandon.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.3.1  Tessylo  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.3    3 years ago

Successful how?

No evidence to support success for anything has ever been provided by anyone - other than the tax breaks for the already extremely wealthy.  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.3.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tessylo @2.3.1    3 years ago
No evidence to support success for anything has ever been provided by anyone - other than the tax breaks for the already extremely wealthy.  

You apparently missed the write up that Trumps Tax Brakes worked.

You need to keep up if you want to play.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
2.3.3  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.3    3 years ago
This is rich coming from somebody who STILL puts up the hoaxes and propaganda daily here on NT.

Post one example and back it up with verifiable proof.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
2.4  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  JohnRussell @2    3 years ago

His supporters are still trying to make a dollar out of 90 cents.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3  Ender    3 years ago

TDS Alert !

TDS Alert !

 
 
 
Hallux
Masters Principal
4  Hallux    3 years ago

An alternate view ...

How Private Money From Facebook's CEO Saved The 2020 Election

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hallux @4    3 years ago

Yes, that's right, the bias from NPR is fairly thick. My copy is on the way.

 
 
 
Hallux
Masters Principal
4.1.1  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1    3 years ago

Do you have an issue matching bias with bias? Your seed is not wrapped in innocent gossamer. 

 
 
 
Colour Me Free
Senior Quiet
4.2  Colour Me Free  replied to  Hallux @4    3 years ago

Definitely 2 different spins on the same story .. so, if the truth lies somewhere in the middle .. I wonder what it is .....

 
 
 
Hallux
Masters Principal
4.2.1  Hallux  replied to  Colour Me Free @4.2    3 years ago

Truth is probably straddling a fence somewhere not here and moaning in discomfort.

 
 
 
Colour Me Free
Senior Quiet
4.2.2  Colour Me Free  replied to  Hallux @4.2.1    3 years ago

[sigh] ... Yep I do believe you are most likely correct .. truth is a dreaded 'bothsider' ..................................... sadly our partisan politics gloms onto that bit of truth that can be manipulated to fit their narrative ...! 

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Guide
4.2.3  Veronica  replied to  Colour Me Free @4.2.2    3 years ago

Yep yep yep yep.

 
 
 
Colour Me Free
Senior Quiet
4.2.5  Colour Me Free  replied to    3 years ago

Hello Razing ..

Seems as though 'truth' is not 'the truth' til bias is applied!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5  XXJefferson51    3 years ago

Stolen by other means…

 
 

Who is online



devangelical
Igknorantzruls
Tessylo
Snuffy


44 visitors