Leftists are Preparing to Riot if Rittenhouse is Acquitted
By: Will
Hopefully saner heads will prevail. Hopefully it will be really cold in the potentially affected urban areas. Clearly this is a self defense case. Hopefully the PD’s will be ready and their mayors and Soros DA’s won’t hamstring them. The BLM threats on top of the ones made against NYC on another matter are particularly odious.
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Leftists are Preparing to Riot if Rittenhouse is Acquitted
by Will
As it becomes increasingly apparent that the prosecution’s case against Kyle Rittenhouse is weak and he will likely be acquitted, leftists, who have slandered Mr. Rittenhouse as a vigilante and murderer since the events in Kenosha, are getting increasingly angry. Some are even preparing to riot if he is acquitted, which is very likely.
Some call for rioting and looting of the sort seen after George Floyd’s death if he’s acquitted. Others are calling for the death of Mr. Rittenhouse himself. Many are calling for violence of any sort. Here are some examples of those calls for violence:
And the police seem to be taking those calls for violence as more than idle chatter. In fact, as Tim Pool reported on his podcast, riot police are gearing up for yet more BLM riots:
Tim Pool’s report is backed up by an article in the Chicago Sun-Times , which reports that Chicago’s police are being put on standby in case of massive riots:
The Chicago Police Department has canceled regularly scheduled days off starting Friday and through the weekend in apparent anticipation of civil unrest in the event that Kyle Rittenhouse is acquitted.
[…]“All RDO personnel will be attired in the prescribed regulation field uniform of the day, including helmet, baton and yellow safety vest,” said the memo, dispatched by a sergeant on behalf of First Deputy Police Supt. Eric Carter.
John Nolte added to that report, writing about the sad irony of it for Breitbart and saying that:
Because Chicago is run by Democrats, because the corporate media have been shamelessly lying about the truth of what’s been revealed in the Rittenhouse trial, Chicago police know that if Rittenhouse is acquitted (as he should be), the left-wing terrorists in Antifa and Black Lives Matter, these dangerous babies who can’t deal with things not going their way, are almost certain to take to the streets to loot and burn in the name of social justice or something.
To which I can only say lol.
First off, while I certainly don’t wish riots on any neighborhood, it’s hard not to laugh at the irony of this. Leftists rioting in leftist cities where everyone’s voted Democrat for decades; where left-wing policies are enacted with no opposition…. So where’s the utopia everyone was promised?
As The Informed Youth reports , the problem for the left, the problem creating such outrage and vicious calls for violence, is that the prosecution simply doesn’t have a good case against Mr. Rittenhouse, who only fired upon his attackers when he was forced to defend himself from a horde of angry Antifa goons:
The prosecution against Rittenhouse is falling apart, mainly because there was no place for this trial to begin with. Prosecutors have had a hard time pinning any blame on Rittenhouse because the evidence has revealed that this incident is one of the most open-and-shut cases regarding self-defense in history. During the trial, it has been revealed that rioter Gaige Grosskreutz pulled a handgun on Rittenhouse. The rioter conceded that he was not shot until he had done so. Another rioter who was shot and killed was also revealed to have been lunging for Rittenhouse’s gun. This evidence hammered yet another nail into the prosecution’s grave.
Unfortunately, this isn’t the first time leftists have threatened to riot if the outcome of a trial is something other than what they might like. During the trial of police officer Dereck Chauvin, for instance, BLM agitators threatened to repeat the chaos and rioting that rocked America after George Floyd’s death if Chauvin was acquitted. Apparently, some Americans would rather threaten the justice system with violence than see blind justice served.
Tags
Who is online
58 visitors
They don't really care about this case that much they're just looking for an excuse to loot and burn. It's been a tough year for these Bums, last year was great for them with stimulus checks, unemployment bonuses and lots of Looting but this past summer was a bust and they need to steal some shit.
Antifa and BLM are so predictable it is sickening. So are the Democrats that support these domestic terrorists.
"Leftists Are Preparing To Riot If Rittenhouse Is Acquitted"
Says who?
Trending Politics?
They listed several other sources in their article. This from one using occupy democrats memes and daily beast articles? Pot, kettle….
Speaking of lacking balls.
LOL!
So I take it anyone who isn't "preparing to riot if Rittenhouse is Acquitted" aren't really leftists? Because I'm certainly not and no other progressives, liberals and/or Democrats I know are.
Perhaps some extremists, either left or right, are preparing to riot if the outcome doesn't go their way, but this seed is nothing but another in a long line of bullshit opinion coming from right wing extremists trying their best to deflect and distract from the real story which is that one of their own, a little whiny cray baby bitch right wing extremist who showed up at a protest with an assault rifle and after he shot someone and others tried to take his gun away claimed his life was threatened so he had to shoot anyone who tried to take his gun.
I wonder if this defense would work for a school shooter. Claims he felt threatened by bullies at school, brings his AR-15 to class to confront the bullies then claims self defense when he shoots teachers or other students trying to get the gun away from him. "Well I felt scared for my life when that school security guard pointed their gun at me so I had to shoot them...".
"Perhaps some extremists, either left or right, are preparing to riot if the outcome doesn't go their way, but this seed is nothing but another in a long line of bullshit opinion coming from right wing extremists trying their best to deflect and distract from the real story which is that one of their own, a little whiny cray baby bitch right wing extremist who showed up at a protest with an assault rifle and after he shot someone and others tried to take his gun away claimed his life was threatened so he had to shoot anyone who tried to take his gun."
That's all they got DP - projection, deflection, and denial.
Somebody hasn't been paying attention to what's going on.
[DELETED]
That leaves out all of the alleged conservatives here
[DELETED]
She does that to avoid tickets because she is not responding DIRECTLY to you.
She used to post insulting shit to us, then delete it before the time ran out.
Someone finally slapped her penis for doing that.
Do you not understand how self defense works? You can't initiate a confrontation and claim self defense. Believe it or not, people have thought of these silly little loopholes over the hundreds of years the doctrine of self defense has evolved. It's boggles the mind that people think Rittenhouse's case is some new application of a new fangled doctrine.
The amount of ignorance self defense law and what will supposedly be allowed when Rittenhouse is found innocent is staggering. If you are attacked and reasonably believe your life is in danger or you are in danger of serious bodily harm, you can use lethal force to stop the threat. It's not that complicated.
The depths of the stupidity is remarkable. Some have great talents for it.
Yes dear, some certainly do!
It seems that is exactly what Rittenhouse is doing. After hearing a gun shot he turned on people behind him and fired and shot an unarmed protestor. Then after fleeing the scene he shot at those who were trying to apprehend him and is now claiming self defense.
The problem with that is that Rittenhouse had not been attacked when he shot the first victim in the parking lot. Perhaps he could claim the shot fired in there air nearby made him jumpy, but he did not see anyone shooting at him or even threatening him with a gun at that point. Once he shot someone, if he was acting in self defense, he should have put his gun down, called 911 and tried to help the person he had just shot. Instead he ran off with his assault rifle and then was chased by people shouting "That's the shooter!" and instead of stopping or putting his hands up and acting non-threateningly to the pursuers and waiting for police, he turned on them and shot those apparent heroes and the 'good guy with a gun' who had quite logically pulled their gun on an apparent active shooter.
Tell me truthfully, if Rittenhouse had turned out to be a member of ANTIFA and was armed with an assault rifle at a "Unite the Right" protest and the exact same events played out, he shot someone, fled the scene and then other right wing protestors charged him in an attempt to seize his weapon and apprehend him, would you still be defending him claiming it was clearly self defense after he shoots several more right wing conservatives?
Kyle Rittenhouse
Lol... You somehow missed the "unarmed protester" (arsonist) threatened to kill Rittenhouse, was chasing him and tried to take his gun. Same threat as your average school kid sitting in a classroom, right?
hen after fleeing the scene he shot at those who were trying to apprehend
Honest descriptions aren't your thing, are they? The mob chased him, was shouting to kill him and attacked him as he tried to reach the safety of police. He didn't "flee the scene" he went to find police and that's the un contradicted evidence. This is in the middle of a riot and people were threatening to kill him. He ran to the police and told them he shot someone.
This isn't difficult. It's not reasonable to believe a random school kid is trying to kill you. It's reasonable to shoot a violent felon who is chasing you, threatened to kill you and tried to take your gun . It's not reasonable to shoot a police officer. When you concoct all these scenarios just ask yourself if the person being attacked reasonably believes the person he's trying to stop is a threat to his life or to cause significant injury.
h that is that Rittenhouse had not been attacked when he shot the first victim in the parking lot Perhaps he could claim the shot fired in there air nearby made him jumpy
Of course it made him jumpy, it would make any reasonable person jumpy when a gunshot comes from the direction of someone who was chasing and threatening to kill you. You don't have to wait to be stabbed, or punched or shot to defend yourself because common sense will tell you that it's often too late at that point.
tenhouse had turned out to be a member of ANTIFA and was armed with an assault rifle at a "Unite the Right" protest and the ex
Of course. I don't support rioting, looting or violent demonstrations and believe once you are in a situation where the law breaks down and felonies are being committed, self defense becomes more reasonable. For instance, I don't think the officer should be charged for shooting the unarmed woman on Capitol Hill and she posed only a fraction of the risk to that officer that the people who attacked Rittenhouse did to Rittenhouse.
Gaige Grosskreutz, a licensed paramedic who said he thought Rittenhouse was an active shooter, approached Rittenhouse and pointing a handgun at him; Rittenhouse shot him severing Grosskreutz's biceps muscle.
He was clearly trying to apprehend Rittenhouse by pointing the gun at him, not execute him.
I take it no conservatives want to comment on how they'd feel if Rittenhouse had stopped for photos with members of ANTIFA instead of the Proud Boys and had shot three and killed two right wing conservatives while they were protesting the removal of a confederate monument and the events were all identical, just the ideology of the protestors and shooter were flipped. I've no doubt the conservatives here loudly defending him would be calling for the death penalty.
he thought wrong
A minor little detail…
I agree. The mob wanted to kill him.
The illustrations in 6.3.5 are consistent with testimony and video evidence and I stand by them all.
keeping it classy nitwit?
[This one stands. The author of or contributors to the article are fair game, so long as they are not NTers.]
Where is your link to what you quoted since you weren’t quoting and responding to anyone here?
Vigilante murder is what they are calling for... Justice be damned..
I thought lynchin was illegal.... It doesn't matter if you wear a white hood or a black one...
That is exactly what the street mob was trying to do to Rittenhouse.
The media coverage of the trial (actually the whole incident back to the shooting of the knife wielding cop attacker that promoted the riots) has been thoroughly dishonest and irresponsible leaving the people who trust them ignorant of the actual facts. The recent obsession with the judge (he joked about supply chain issues) while ignoring the evidence that will lead to an acquittal is part and parcel of their agenda since day 1.
It has been particularly disturbing watching mainstream outlets ignore the fact that the chain of events which culminated in the two killings during the protests did, in fact, begin with someone chasing Rittenhouse and Rittenhouse looking back at the sound of gunfire to see someone lunging at him.
Here's one summary of recent malparactice:
"Vice, for example, ran this account by Tess Owen :
Hours later, after a confrontation between protesters and militia men, Rittenhouse opened fire, according to bystander video from the scene.
On Tuesday night, Rittenhouse joined up with a crew of pro-cop vigilantes and militiamen who had been standing guard by a gas station. He was shown on video palling around with police officers, who thanked him for being there and gave him a bottle of water — even though it was after the 8 p.m. curfew.
First he allegedly killed a protester, by shooting him in the head. Then he tried to run away, while talking on the phone: “I’ve just killed someone,” he said in video captured on a cell phone .
A crowd of protesters then chased Rittenhouse down a street, a scene captured from multiple angles on cell phones. He tripped, fell, and just as two protesters came toward him, he sat up, aimed, and opened fire. He appeared to shoot one person in the chest, killing them, and injured a second with a bullet to the arm.
It is depressing that this was published in a major news outlet. The single most important detail in any ambiguous shooting — what happened immediately prior — is left out entirely. Readers are kept ignorant (or maybe the better phrase is “protected from”) the reality of the initial shooting, which is that there is, at the very least, a non-ridiculous self-defense argument to be made. “Rittenhouse shot someone who was lunging at him after he heard a gunshot nearby” gets transformed to the more ideologically digestible “he allegedly killed a protester, by shooting him in the head.” This is one of those situations where a sentence is simultaneously true in a narrow, literal sense, and yet also deeply misleading."
People are going to be upset because they've been a fed a deeply dishonest narrative.
Yes, by the supporters of this piece of shit fat little republican thug killer Rittenhouse.
Here's Jesse Signal summarizing why leftists will riot over a straight forward case of self defense:
Many people are walking around with a false notion of what happened in Kenosha on August 25th in their heads. They have been misinformed by media outlets, pundits, and some politicians. That’s a problem because it leaves them ill-equipped to interpret whatever comes next. The outrage over his (very high) bail is one example. But other, bigger ramifications could ensue. Let’s say I’m right, the self-defense claim prevails, and Rittenhouse is subsequently acquitted of the most serious charges. For those of us who know and have absorbed the full facts, this won’t be all that surprising. For those whose view of the world is distorted by a fog of epistemic closure, it will be shocking, outrageous — He killed three people in cold blood! The only explanation for his acquittal will be white supremacy or some other corruption, because how else could a jury acquit such a monster? And this explanation will serve only to further reinforce people’s preexisting ideological and tribal commitments, driving them deeper into their worldview and toward pundits and journalists who see the world the same way they do. Epistemic closure is a one-way street.
It's in no way shape or form a case of self defense.
See 6.1.2
Lol. I'll give your opinion all the weight it deserves.
Exactly! There’s no there there. No weight at all.
Right back at ya.
Who are you responding to and on what thread? There is no context for this as a standalone comment.
And she is effective with it cause you guys give her the thing she wants, attention.... You want her to stop, stop responding, put her on ignore... Guaranteed it's the one thing she will hate the most...
There is a very different standard on a variety of issues between what they can say and do here compared to us.
It is a perfect and accurate introduction.
It's immature. It's stupid. It's all made up bullshit.
That's why she hates it.
[Deleted]
[Deleted]
Exactly!
Thanks for your kind words. I appreciate them!
No, it’s not. It’s the highest of maturity, it’s exquisitely brilliant. It’s all factually true and exceptionally well said.
The lefties will riot no matter what the out come of the trial. If he is convicted they will riot in celebration. If he is acquitted, they will riot in protest. After all, Christmas is coming and they gave to do their Christmas looting.
They will use it with their five finger discount to solve their supply chain and inflation issues
These mouth breathing imbeciles make no sense. They riot when a criminal dies of a drug overdose and will riot when somebody is acquitted due to self defense. That must be some powerful Kool-ade.
Not really surprising coming from the left.
I wonder if Mayor Beetlejuice approved this.
JFC - the made up ignorance is just dumbfounding. Y'all make up this shit as you go along. And agree with it.
Exactly what did I make up?
Everything.
So prove me wrong or move along troll.
Oh I know the chances of that happening are about the same as Stimata happening.
I can’t wait to see Mayor Adams NYC police do to BLM what should have been done to them in the late spring early summer of 2020. Time to order the popcorn!
All this for a sex abuser who anally abused small children and a woman beater.
They must be so proud of themselves.
Sorry Sunshine. This was meant for another comment sequence and not at you.
My apologies.
No problem.
So this little republican Rittenhouse was the judge, jury, and executioner - who couldn't possibly have known of any alleged crimes by those he murdered.
Just executioner of the pricks.
I imagine the children and women will not miss them.
No, he was the Victim he was forced to defend himself from the violent attacks by the three thugs he shot.
Thanks everyone! All great points well made!
piece of shit should have been locked up to begin with. They don’t punish child rapists harsh enough
No they don't. That asshole would do it again and probably already had.
You are exactly right about him. He did exactly that. Thanks for all of your fine contributions to my seed here. I appreciate them and agree with all that you said here.