╌>

"Meet the Press" misrepresents Barr statement

  
By:  Vic Eldred  •  6 years ago  •  27 comments


"Meet the Press" misrepresents Barr statement
 

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

The left wing media did it again. In their zeal to demonize the Attorney General they now hate for defending the rule of law, they deceptively edited a statement AG William Barr made concerning the Michael Flynn case. NBC was forced to concede the distortion within hours after the broadcast.

Here are the two transcripts:

The edited transcript:

EXrCf-EXsAIyvR5?format=jpg&name=small

The Full Transcript:


EXrCf-DXgAEZzTU?format=jpg&name=360x360











The Complaint from the DOJ:

KerriKupecDOJ


✔ @KerriKupecDOJ


 ·  8h






Very disappointed by the deceptive editing/commentary by @ ChuckTodd on @ MeetThePress on AG Barr’s CBS interview.





The admission:




Meet the Press

✔ @MeetThePress




Replying to @KerriKupecDOJ @chucktodd



You’re correct. Earlier today, we inadvertently and inaccurately cut short a video clip of an interview with AG Barr before offering commentary and analysis. The remaining clip included important remarks from the attorney general that we missed, and we regret the error.



The Bottom Line:

On the recommendation of U.S. Attorney Jeff Jensen, the Justice Department moved to drop it's case against Michael Flynn. Michael Flynn was framed by the FBI and AG William Barr is a Profile in Courage for correcting a miscarriage of Justice.



Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    6 years ago

NBC calls it "a mistake"


Trump is off topic

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.1  Split Personality  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    6 years ago

Typical reporting, both sides have been doing it for hundreds of years.

Saw the live bit with the chuckle from Barr, before he added his disclaimer. He deserves the criticism in my opinion.

Remember this shit show?  Talk about one side's context blinders...

Speaking in Roanoke, Va., earlier this month, Obama pushed the importance of continued government investments in public services and infrastructure that many U.S. businesses rely on to function. "If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help … Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you've got a business — you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen," Obama said.

Republicans have seized on the line " you didn't build that " to falsely claim that Obama was speaking directly to business owners about their businesses.

The RNC and the Romney campaign have been relentless in pushing the "you didn't build this" meme in ads, speeches and campaign videos. A Romney business roundtable meeting in California yesterday featured the slogan " We Did Build It ."

The same people that believe Obama was twiddling his thumbs during the 911 attacks, believe the misrepresentation of Obama's comments about infrastructure.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
1.1.1  Snuffy  replied to  Split Personality @1.1    6 years ago

So on one hand you have a news organization doing an opinion and analysis show that indulged in some creative editing to misrepresent what was said and cherry picked the words they presented so that they could then provide their opinion on it.

On the other hand you have a political party and a presidential campaign performing normal political partisan bullshit.

And you want to equate the two?  I don't know anybody who tunes into a political campaign ad to see the truth, they know in advance all they are going to get is bragging and/or dirt on the other side.

People I know tune in to news shows to get the truth in order to make decisions on how it impacts them. If the news they are presented with is twisted then any decision they make will not be valid. How far up the ladder does this opinionated lying about the news go?  How long has it been going on? How are people supposed to know if anything they have been told is the truth? We see all the time one news organization will make a claim and others will jump on it citing the first story as proof.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
1.1.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Snuffy @1.1.1    6 years ago
On the other hand you have a political party and a presidential campaign performing normal political partisan bullshit.

PLEASE...

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
1.1.3  Snuffy  replied to  igknorantzrulz @1.1.2    6 years ago

What???   You don't think the crap that Romney and the RNC was pushing in response to the speech by Obama about infrastructure and how important that is for business to succeed was political partisan bullshit?  Are you trying to tell me that  you believe Romney, with his "We did build that" campaign,  was correct in his attack on Obama?

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
1.1.4  Ender  replied to  Snuffy @1.1.3    6 years ago
If the news they are presented with is twisted then any decision they make will not be valid.

The point can be made that according to your standards, fox news cannot be valid.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4  JohnRussell    6 years ago

Big deal.   The right is getting very prolific at whining. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
4.1  Ender  replied to  JohnRussell @4    6 years ago

Getting? Whining, complaining, blaming others, seems to be stock in trade.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @4    6 years ago

Like how  the left whines when their lies eat exposed.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
4.2.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.2    6 years ago

what do you suppose they taste like  ?

like Chicken, or Crow ?

Sure is a good thing no one on the 'right' ever does this, 

as there is one not right rightie that LIES multiple times a day

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
5  Ender    6 years ago

Barr has always been a partisan that thinks an office of power is immune to acts of punishment.

Look at his history.

He was instrumental in getting pardons for a lot of people in positions of power and basically stopping prosecutions.

I have said this before, he was put there for a reason.

Draining the swamp my ass.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
5.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Ender @5    6 years ago

Draining the swamp my ass.

This administration HAS SWAMP ASS

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
6  Snuffy    6 years ago

NBC has a history of creatively editing tapes for broadcast. They seem to have their marching orders to always be first to push an angle, is it in hopes of gaining viewership and more money?  Does anybody remember the editing job they did on the George Zimmerman 911 tape?

IMO they have gone first in pushing their editorial opinions as actual news. I stopped watching or relying on them for any news quite a while ago.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
6.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Snuffy @6    6 years ago

IMO they have gone first in pushing their editorial opinions as actual news. I stopped watching or relying on them for any news quite a while ago.

good thing Fox Entertainment never pushes an agenda, huh ?

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
6.1.1  Snuffy  replied to  igknorantzrulz @6.1    6 years ago
good thing Fox Entertainment never pushes an agenda, huh ?

I never said they didn't.  Hell, in my opinion they all push a fucking agenda. But as this seed was on NBC and how they creatively edited a tape of AG Barr I tried to stay on topic rather than freelance.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
6.1.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Snuffy @6.1.1    6 years ago

i charge for freelance

so

no freelance here.

just find it amusing as to how many Fox "News" watchers are so quick to demonize NBC, all while many get the majority of their "news"/talking points from  a propaganda outlet tat goes much further on its' agenda pushing than the other major outlets.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
6.1.3  Tacos!  replied to  igknorantzrulz @6.1.2    6 years ago
so quick to demonize NBC

There is no "demonizing" go on. Chuck Todd literally told a lie. It wasn't about interpretation, context, or nuance. He said something didn't happen that did. Period. End of story. He's a lying liar. If you can't admit that simple truth, that's a real problem.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
6.1.5  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Tacos! @6.1.3    6 years ago
He said something didn't happen that did.

and what was that ?

please do state specifically

.

it is WRONG to take it out of context.

I've seen it done umpteen thousands of times by the 'right', who are also obviously WRONG.

How come you are not as upset when YOU are lied to DAILY, by our POTUS ?

Selective out rage i see.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
6.1.7  igknorantzrulz  replied to  XXJefferson51 @6.1.6    6 years ago

thought Vic said he was off topic...

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
6.1.9  igknorantzrulz  replied to  XXJefferson51 @6.1.8    6 years ago

thus Y U Wrote it 

F U Think you're clever, i'll introduce one to my cleaver in June, cause don't you think Wally's old man was a little ruff on the Beeave lasy night ?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
7  Tacos!    6 years ago

They didn't just mislead. They straight up lied. They said he didn't say it upheld the rule of law, but he actually did say that. Liars.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
7.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Tacos! @7    6 years ago

in his interpretation, one vtwisted likev a sister, as it could be interpretted, and it has been by many, that he has again, only done Trumps bidding. \He's an

mBarrassmeant for defenders like you, and all of US

 
 

Who is online



232 visitors