ANTIFA: "Practice things like an eye gouge, it takes very little pressure to injure someone's eyes."
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
In light of recent events, Project Veritas today released a video exposing the violent nature of the controversial group known as "Antifa."
-
Nicholas Cifuni, Rose City Antifa: "Practice Things Like an Eye Gouge, it Takes Very Little Pressure to Injure Someone's Eyes."
-
Nicholas Cifuni, Rose City Antifa: "Police Are Going to Be Like: 'Perfect, We Can Prosecute These [Antifa] F**kers, Look How Violent They Are.' And Not That We [Antifa] Aren't, But We Need to F**king Hide That Sh*t."
-
Nicholas Cifuni, Rose City Antifa: "Consider Like, Destroying Your Enemy. Not Like Delivering a Really Awesome Right Hand, Right Eye, Left Eye Blow You Know. It's Not Boxing, It's Not Kickboxing, It's Like Destroying Your Enemy."
-
Ashes, Rose City Antifa: "The Whole Goal of This, Right, is to Get Out There and do Dangerous Things as Safely as Possible."
Play
"Depending on the setting, if I were to be caught or found out in a setting where I am present with them, it could escalate to violence against me," said the Project Veritas Undercover Journalist.
"Project Veritas does not condone any violence whatsoever. It is a sad time in our
nation's history with Antifa activists hijacking #blacklivesmatter protests in cities across the country, attacking the police and engaging in violence," said Project Veritas Founder and CEO, James O'Keefe.
"In many places, it appears the violence is planned, organized & driven by anarchic left extremist groups — far-left extremist groups using Antifa-like tactics."
Antifa is short for anti-fascist. The group has long claimed a leadership role in violent movements across America and the world.
"They do not hesitate to either push back or incite some kind of violence. In our classes and in our meetings, before we do any sort of demonstration or Black Bloc, we talk about weapons detail and what we carry and what we should have," said the Project Veritas Undercover Journalist.
Earlier this week, President Donald Trump said the United States would designate "Antifa"
as a terrorist organization.
National Security Adviser Robert O'Brien echoed Trump's comments Sunday morning, saying the violence "is being driven by 'Antifa.'"
Attorney General William Barr announced in a statement that he will enforce action
against the group, saying "violent radical elements" are hijacking legitimate protests to "pursue their own separate, violent, and extremist agenda."
Tags
Who is online
407 visitors
I find "the nose break" to be very effective.
When opposing a little turd that's going for the eye gouge "the throat punch" would be a good choice as well.
I've always liked to wait till they throw a punch then grab the arm pull them towards me and jump up and knee them in the ribs under the arm. I've never had anyone who still wanted to fight after that, I am real good at playing hacky sack and it's from that skill that I developed this move.
The hacky sack wack ... there you go.
Just be careful with that on an experienced fighter.
The arm grab can be turned against you relatively easily by a properly trained person
It happens pretty fast like one second beside since it's a counter move they've already thrown the punch so they're helping me. The best defense would be to drop their elbow to protect their ribs (if they're strong enough) but even then I end up behind them. It works well for me because I usually have my hands up trying to talk my way out of the fight so if they attack at that point I don't feel bad for breaking three or four of their ribs.
In Chin Na Kung Fu we actually encourage our opponents to grab our arms.
Yes it is. I have used it myself. It will bring a grown man to his knees!
It's a good spot, very tender and shocking when hit and most people subconsciously protect their face first so its a bit easier to slip one in there.
I'm getting too old to mix it up that way unless I can catch them by surprise and disable them quickly. I'm well trained in both lethal and non lethal methods but I just don't have the stamina any more. However, the eye gouge is considered a felonious assault. To stop a felonious assault, deadly force is authorized. Therefore, the correct response to the eye gouge is to take one quick step back and shoot them in the chest.
I probably won't be on your jury if you ever get charged for that as i agree with you.
Hopefully they don't get your shooting eye.
Spending 20 years as a Navy FMF Corpsman who had dirty infighting techniques taught to him by some very badass Marine Recon instructors as well as having spent many years as a x-ray technician, I know where a lot of the body's vulnerable spots are that most folks do not even think of. One of the simplest ones is that if somebody goes to strike you, stomp down real hard with the heel of your foot right on the top of the arch of the foot! I guarantee you they will lose interest i you real quick. Just one of many
Anything from project veritas is a lie.
BLM is not much better
I'm completely disheartened by what I'm seeing everywhere except for the few store owners that are taking the necessary steps to protect their community from the burning, looting and murdering I've been seeing through live feeds of the riots. The protesters know they are being used as shields to protect the looters and do little to bring the thugs to justice and protect the community. They are enabling this destruction. Law enforcement has been a complete failure at protecting the communities and in some cases stand by watching as the thugs burn and loot. Trump has failed to use the force needed to protect these communities.
Antifa and the so called peaceful protesters are working together to burn, loot and murder. There is nothing peaceful about blocking a road or freeway and preventing good people from going to the hospital or to work. Antifa must want every city to end up like Detroit where business owners packed up and built safe businesses outside the city limits and left the city in ruin to never recover.
[deleted]
[meta]
I'm sure this will be flagged as meta, but I just have to ask, is this really allowed? Where a moderator can editorialize and leave their own personal attack like "not your latest conspiracy" in the moderation comment field? Am I the only one who finds this completely unacceptable? Shouldn't it simply be left at "off topic" if that was my supposed offense in the moderators opinion?
You are right DP. There should be no commentary to a member in moderation. I don't see it now, so I guess it was revised.
I think DP is talking about the purple ink in the body of his comment.
this:
[removed for context] This is DP's first comment in this thread
I see it
[deleted]
Off Topic (per author/seeder) [The People's Fish, Still "Hand Of The Queen"]
Sorry, my bad. I thought it had been deleted but now I see it again. I have deleted it.
Thank you.
I don't believe anything project full of shit says. They are known liars and con artists.
The remainder of this thread was removed for off topic personal insults etc., SP
Known to whom, [deleted] What EVIDENCE do they have?
Very true. But be careful, that might be deemed a "conspiracy theory" even though it's established fact.
"The AG's Report was released on April 1, 2010, concluding that the videos from ACORN offices in Los Angeles, San Diego, and San Bernardino had been "severely edited." [
"The AG's Report noted that " O'Keefe stated that he was out to make a point and to damage ACORN and therefore did not act as a journalist objectively reporting a story ".
"O'Keefe and colleagues were arrested in the Hale Boggs Federal Complex in New Orleans in January 2010 and charged with entering federal property under false pretenses with the intent of committing a felony, at the office of United States Senator Mary Landrieu, a Democrat"
" O'Keefe and the others pleaded guilty on May 26 . O'Keefe was sentenced to three years' probation, 100 hours of community service and a $1,500 fine."
In regards to a doctored NPR video, The Washington Post noted "O'Keefe did not merely leave a false impression; he manufactured an elaborate, alluring lie." Time magazine wrote that the video "transposed remarks from a different part of the meeting", was "manipulative" and "a partisan hit-job."
It's no wonder the dishonest Trump campaign donated thousands to such a piece of lying dog shit like Project Vertas. And yet these sycophantic Trump supporters just eat it up because the doctored and edited videos are tickling their ears telling them what they already want to believe regardless of whether it's true or not. There is more truth in just about any late night show hosts monologue about the days news events than there has ever been from Project Veritrash or smug little Jimmy "The Fraud" O'Keefe.