The man of conviction does it again!
So you thought the culture wars were over and the left had won?
Then you didn't figure on Donald Trump.
I don't think Donald Trump ever realized just how vicious or devious those on the left could be until he became President. Then he and the rest of us witnessed how powerful they had become and just what they were capable of. Fortunately for us the man who now occupies the White House is a model of strength & conviction.
Thus, a few days ago the President directed federal agencies to stop teaching government workers about CRT and other concepts like “white privilege” because they are clearly“divisive, anti-American propaganda.” In other words, the President ended the insidious teaching of "Critical Race Theory."
Didn't know it was going on, you say?
Yep! It was going on in the federal government, in some corporations, some schools and God help us, even the military!
What is it about?
It involves “training sessions” in which white government employees were basically told they were inherently racist and made to confess and apologize for their privilege.
Where did it come from?
Left wing academia, of course!
Want to know the dirty details?
Tucker Carlson has them:
So, once again it was Donald Trump who had the guts to do something that nobody would do before - end the teaching of a hateful race based ideology. Something that was being taught without the knowledge of many people. Critical Race Theory undermines the positive core beliefs of America by redefining the nation as inherently racist and white people as inherently racist.
Well done Mr President!
Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
Tags
Who is online
97 visitors
I would have to add that I believe the violence we are seeing in American cities is a consequence of similar indoctrination.
And it comes on the heels of his Middle East Deal
Great news.
Trump has as much chance of winning the Nobel Peace Prize as you or I do.
Anyone can be nominated.
And anyone can win. The Nork and Israeli deals are "a big fucking deal man". What did the last POTUS do to get it except for being elected while black? NAFTA? And no, not the trade deal. Not A Fucking Thing Again.
True, the TDS looners on the left would never allow it.
. According to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, anyone familiar with the process who can give a convincing enough argument, can pretty much nominate whoever they want. Just look at this list of other absurd nominations throughout history.
Rush Limbaugh
Misinformed sexist right-winger, Rush Limbaugh, was nominated for the award in 2007. He was deemed fitting by the committee because he “uses his show to become the foremost advocate for freedom and democracy in the world today.” Seems like a bold claim considering all Rush Limbaugh did on his show during that time was talk about how Iraqi War veterans were “phony soldiers” and how Michael J. Fox exaggerated his Parkinson’s disease to advocate funding for stem cell research. But it was a vicious defeat when this global warming denier lost to Al Gore and his Oscar-winning PowerPoint presentation on climate change.
Benito Mussolini
The same year Italian Fascist Dictator Benito Mussolini was invading Ethiopia and placing three quarters of Italian businesses under state control, he was nominated for the 1935 Nobel Peace Prize. He received not one letter of recommendation, but two: one from a law professor in Germany, and the other from a professor in France. Mysteriously, those letters cannot be found in the Nobel Institute archives, so we’ll never know the exact reason why two professors deemed him worthy of such an award. Mussolini was not considered in the shortlist, but there was so much disagreement within the committee that the prize was not awarded that year. I guess if Mussolini can’t have it, then no one can.
Josef Stalin
Former Soviet Union leader, Josef Stalin, was nominated twice: in 1945 and 1948. Apparently it was for his efforts in ending World War II. But leading a violent siege of Berlin, causing 65,000 deaths, executing over 25,000 Polish POWs, orchestrating a political campaign later referred to as “The Great Terror,” and leading troops to rape women along the way, does not end wars: it perpetuates them.
Adolf Hitler
Josef Stalin wasn’t the only World War II bad boy to snag a Nobel Peace Prize nomination. In 1939, Adolf Hitler was nominated by a member of the Swedish parliament, E.G.C. Brandt. But Brandt didn’t do it seriously. He intended it to be a satiric criticism to point out the flaws of foreign policies of the day, particularly the Munich Pact in 1938, which allowed Nazi Germany to take over parts of Czechoslovakia. No one got the joke, and the nomination was withdrawn, but not withdrawn from history.
Fidel Castro
Self-proclaimed Marxist-Leninist Socialist, Fidel Castro, got a Nobel Peace Prize nomination in 2001. But what was more shocking was the reason his supporter, Norwegian parliament member, Hallgeir Langeland, nominated him. Regardless of Castro’s past crimes against humanity, Langeland defended his nomination arguing “what do you prefer? The right to vote, or easy access to schools, health care, housing and food, as in the case in Cuba.” There are plenty of countries where both voting and basic rights to education and physical well-being coexist just fine without limiting freedom. Langeland should be aware of that since he’s a government official in one of the countries that does it best. Castro didn’t win the award, but he is no loser. In 2014, he won China’s Confucius Peace Prize.
Vladimir Putin
Vladimir Putin, the poster child for modern-day invasions, was nominated by the International Academy of Spiritual Unity and Cooperation of Peoples of the World in 2014. It’s not mysterious at all that it’s a Russian advocacy group. They wanted Putin to be recognized for his efforts in using non-military action to get the Syrian government to surrender its chemical weapons. It was enough for the committee to consider him for a couple of rounds even though he had invaded the Ukraine by this point. But, ultimately, he didn’t win because Syria was “behind schedule in turning over its weapons”, which is the polite way of saying Syria blew off Putin’s orders.
3 .png" width="15" height="15" >
https://matadornetwork.com/pulse/historys-ironic-nobel-peace-prize-nominees/#:~:text=Fidel%20Castro%20Self-proclaimed%20Marxist-Leninist%20Socialist%2C%20Fidel%20Castro%2C%20got,supporter%2C%20Norwegian%20parliament%20member%2C%20Hallgeir%20Langeland%2C%20nominated%20him.
Your rants will not help him win, sorry. There are a lot of Germans who are showing up at far right rallies waving Q Anon signs and wearing Donald Trump's face on their tee shirts. Yes Donald Trump inspired Q Anon is a thing in Germany. Trump is a hero to the white nationalist German racists. And you think he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize ? Hilarious.
You forgot Barak Obama. He wasn't just selected, for no reason, other than being the first black president, but he actually WON for no apparent reason!
Meh, i lost any respect i ever had for the Nobel Prize (which wasn't much in the first place based on that list alone and that crazy list is actually much longer) when Barry got one for more or less just getting elected first black POTUS.
Just like a HS homecoming king and queen election ..... it's become nothing but popularity contest for people like them.
OMG, we better notify all the other news outlets that it never happened/s
And based on your constant barrage of Never Trump news stories and seeds and "articles", I think my chances are better than yours.
They seem to be using NT as a Biden campaign infomercial. We constantly find the front page littered with anti-Trump trivia. It's kind of like the misinformation they complain on social media - it's blatant bias and pettiness is painfully obvious to the reader.
what would they do without the old game of "unnamed sources" said?
"Anyone can be nominated."
You're right. They gave it to Barak Obama and he did absolutely nothing to earn it except make pretty speeches...
Damn pretty speeches too. Just look at him today! Articulate as h— well, you see him in demand. He is out there talking about recessions, capping deep-seat oil wells, and writing books that makes "beaucoup" dollars.
That may be true, but that still does not change the fact that Obama still did absolutely nothing of consequence to earn the award.
Yup and OJ wasn't guilty either .......
Hilarious. A bunch of [delete] trying their hardest to cover up actual American history because they don't like how it makes them feel. Talk about safe space seeking snowflakes where they can't even accept the reality of the racial divide that not only still exists [delete] I'm very glad these pieces of shit will soon be kicked out of power and real Americans who value our diversity will again lead our nation towards making a more perfect union instead of the [deleted please no cursing] losers trying to conserve their worthless white Christian patriarchy at any cost.
Full attack mode .... classic.
Oh by the way, the 14th, 15th and 19th Amendment called to disagree. Also the Equal Rights Act and the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, 1968 and 1991, etc, etc
People pushing Critical Race Theory have their heads shoved so far up their asses they haven't seen the light of day for decades. But what does one expect? It's origins come from academia.
The place where people who can't "do" tend to end up because they can't "do" anything else.
Yawn ......
Sounds like you've had a few revisionist history courses. I learned that it was America which finally destroyed the institution of slavery - at the ultimate sacrifice of approx 618,000 lives.
It was the nation that actually codified laws for equal rights.
Today it is the nation that tolerates insane arguments over special status and identity politics from the left.
It is the nation which all people of all races want to come to.
I listened to an interview today with Elizabeth Neumannn , who was an official in Trump's Department Of Homeland Security.
Neumann was originally a Republican who was recruited by the transition team to work at Trump's DHS. She ended up leaving earlier this year.
Former Trump DHS official backs Biden, cites Trump racism
Aug 27, 2020 · Elizabeth Neumann , former senior DHS official in the Trump administration talks about how Donald Trump's racist and divisive rhetoric encouraged racist groups, how Trump undermined the response to...
=======================================================================
People like you hide your head in the sand. America could be a shining light on a hill, but it often is not.
I have no interest in what your feeling is about the Nobel Peace Prize. This seed starts off apparently gratified that he was nominated. It is quite meaningless.
And people like you are like Elizabeth Newman (she initially didn't want to work for him - the tip-off)- you'll do anything to stop the President.
We will stop all of you from taking control of this country!
You have no interest in what your own feelings are about the NPP?
One has to be either truly ignorant of the facts or monumentally stupid to believe that when our nation beat the shit out of the treasonous conservative confederates who attacked our nation in an effort to conserve their ability to own other humans as cattle that slavery, racism and xenophobia had ended in this country. One would have to be mentally deficient to believe that the passage of the 1964 civil rights act ended racism, hate and prejudice in this country. It would be beyond moronic to look at the very long list of facts proving the inequity in our justice system and society in general and claim that our long history of racism in this nation is now gone and we no longer have to combat it.
We have made great stride, we have made incredible progress in the last hundred and fifty years, but that fight is no where near complete. Most will agree that just a few decades ago it was almost inconceivable to think America would ever have a black President. But just because we finally fulfilled that dream one time doesn't mean that prejudice that kept black Americans out of the oval office for 240 years is gone, it's still there as we saw from the backlash and increase in white nationalist militia's and white supremacist groups after 2008. So while the progressives keep trying to push this nation onwards towards that more perfect union envisioned by our founders, conservatives continue to dig in their heels and proclaim that enough has been done already and that they feel like they're losing "their" America. Well I hate to be the bearer of bad news but America is for ALL of us regardless of race, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, faith or lack thereof. Those who hate equality with every fiber of their miserable conservative bodies are the ones most invested in the lie that racism is over, that systemic racism doesn't exist, that we shouldn't look too close at the racial disparity in the justice system but if you do it's just because apparently some races are just more inclined to be criminals, the same lie their ancestors and worthless confederate pieces of filth used two centuries ago.
There are still thousands of monuments and memorials to confederate traitors standing in public places of honor as tormentors in death hovering over the minorities they enslaved and spit on in life. And for some reason, conservatives of today, who mostly live in those same confederate States, go to those same white Churches, wave the same treasonous flag, who talk about their long heritage in the south but then claim all the racist southerner's moved out and nice non-racist Republicans moved in, protect the confederate monuments and memorials.
"Our new (Confederate) government is founded upon exactly the opposite (of the US Constitution) ideas; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition." - Vice President of the Confederacy
The proof is in the pudding, we still have a long way to go to get rid of systemic racism in our nation, and the first and most important key will be to simply admit that it exists.
Seems like everything is just "A-Okay" to conservative Republicans, nothing to see here...
We accepted surrender. Genocide of southern whites would have been a little over the top, don't you think?
One would have to be mentally deficient to believe that the passage of the 1964 civil rights act ended racism, hate and prejudice in this country.
It was another big step in codifying equality into our Constitution.
It would be beyond moronic to look at the very long list of facts proving the inequity in our justice system and society in general and claim that our long history of racism in this nation is now gone and we no longer have to combat it.
It would be hateful to the point of evil to deny that America is in no way a racist country!
We have made great stride, we have made incredible progress in the last hundred and fifty years, but that fight is no where near complete.
We have actually changed the way a lot of people used to think. I'm so sorry you missed the Civil War and the Civil Rights Movement. You can read about it all now.
Most will agree that just a few decades ago it was almost inconceivable to think America would ever have a black President. But just because we finally fulfilled that dream one time doesn't mean that prejudice that kept black Americans out of the oval office for 240 years is gone, it's still there as we saw from the backlash and increase in white nationalist militia's and white supremacist groups after 2008.
I'm sure that's what the people of Portland, Seattle, Chicago and NYC worry about when they venture out/s.
So while the progressives keep trying to push this nation onwards towards that more perfect union envisioned by our founders, conservatives continue to dig in their heels and proclaim that enough has been done already and that they feel like they're losing "their" America
I hope you don't mind but many of us don't want any part of your race based utopia.
Those who hate equality with every fiber of their miserable conservative bodies are the ones most invested in the lie that racism is over, that systemic racism doesn't exist, that we shouldn't look too close at the racial disparity in the justice system but if you do it's just because apparently some races are just more inclined to be criminals, the same lie their ancestors and worthless confederate pieces of filth used two centuries ago.
The only people I know who judge others based on race/identity are progressives. Is that the racism you speak of? Then I agree, we have work to do. We have to remove this hate-filled ideology from every corner of this nation.
There are still thousands of monuments and memorials to confederate traitors standing in public places of honor as tormentors in death hovering over the minorities they enslaved and spit on in life.
Go tear them down tough guy - it's ten years now! It should be for life.
BTW, save the photos for people who are trying to get into the country. Tell them how "racist" it is. The funny thing is I don't think they're buying it!
Elizabeth Neumann was a national security veteran who was recruited by the Trump team. She decided to join when John Kelly was named head of the DHS. She became appalled by the White House end of the DHS apparatus.
She's not a liberal , she was a conservative Republican until the Trump team worked their magic on her. Now she's supporting Biden. lol.
How many Never-Trump Republicans are there?
" the term “systemic racism,” often wrongly interpreted as an accusation that everyone in the system is racist. In fact, systemic racism means almost the opposite. It means that we have systems and institutions that produce racially disparate outcomes , regardless of the intentions of the people who work within them. When you consider that much of the criminal justice system was built, honed and firmly established during the Jim Crow era — an era almost everyone, conservatives included, will concede rife with racism — this is pretty intuitive. The modern criminal justice system helped preserve racial order — it kept black people in their place. For much of the early 20th century, in some parts of the country, that was its primary function. That it might retain some of tho se proclivities today shouldn’t be all that surprising.
" by noting that higher rates at which some minority groups commit certain crimes is that it overlooks the fact that huge percentages of black and Latino people have been pulled over, stopped on the street and generally harassed despite the fact that they have done nothing wrong. Stop-and-frisk data, for example, consistently show that about 3 percent of these encounters produce any evidence of a crime. So 97 percent-plus of these people are getting punished solely because they belong to a group that statistically commits some crimes at a higher rate. That ought to bother us."
" while black people make up 19 percent of the Minneapolis population and 9 percent of its police, they were on the receiving end of 58 percent of the city’s police use-of-force incidents."
A massive study published in May 2020 of 95 million traffic stops by 56 police agencies between 2011 and 2018 found that while black people were much more likely to be pulled over than whites, the disparity lessens at night, when police are less able to distinguish the race of the driver. The study also found that blacks were more likely to be searched after a stop, though whites were more likely to be found with illicit drugs ."
An August 2019 study published by the National Academy of Sciences based on police-shooting databases found that between 2013 and 2018, black men were about 2.5 times more likely than white men to be killed by police, and that black men have a 1-in-1,000 chance of dying at the hands of police. Black women were 1.4 more times likely to be killed than white women. Latino men were 1.3 to 1.4 times more likely to be killed than white men.
A 2019 study of 11,000 police stops over about four weeks in the District found that while black people make up 46 percent of the city’s population, they accounted for 70 percent of police stops, and 86 percent of stops that didn’t involve traffic enforcement.
An October 2019 report in the Los Angeles Times found that during traffic stops, “ 24% of black drivers and passengers were searche d, compared with 16% of Latinos and 5% of whites .” The same study also found that police were slightly more likely to find drugs, weapons or other contraband among whites.
Another study found that in surrounding Travis County, Tex. , blacks comprised about 30 percent of police arrests for possession of less than a gram of an illicit drug from 2017 to 2018, despite making up only 9 percent of the county’s population, and that surveys consistently show that blacks and whites use illegal drugs at about the same rate.
A 2019 survey of traffic tickets in Indianapolis and its suburbs found that in the city, black drivers received 1.5 tickets for every white driver. In the suburban town of Fishers, the disparity grew to 4.5 tickets, and in the wealthy suburb of Carmel, black motorists received 18 tickets for every ticket issued to a white motorist.
A 2020 report on 1.8 million police stops by the eight largest law enforcement agencies in California found that blacks were stopped at a rate 2.5 times higher than the per capita rate of whites. The report also found that black people were far more likely to be stopped for “reasonable suspicion” (as opposed to actually breaking a law) and were three times more likely than any other group to be searched, even though searches of white people were more likely to turn up contraband.
A study of 542,000 traffic stops in Connecticut in 2017 found that the racial disparity in stops had narrowed from previous years. But it also found that blacks were more likely to be searched after stops for registration, license, seatbelt and cellphone violations. The study found that about 19 percent of searches of black motorists turned up contraband, vs. 29 percent of the searches of white motorists.
Between 1994 and 2002, Jefferson Parish prosecutors struck 55 percent of blacks from juries, but just 16 percent of whites. Although blacks make up 23 percent of the population, 80 percent of criminal trials had no more than two black jurors in a state where it takes only 10 of 12 juror votes to convict.
A 2017 study of about 48,000 criminal cases in Wisconsin showed that white defendants were 25 percent more likely than black defendants to have their most serious charge dismissed in a plea bargain. Among defendants facing misdemeanor charges that could carry a sentence of incarceration, whites were 75 percent more likely to have those charges dropped , dismissed or reduced to a charge that did not include such a punishment.
A 2016 review of nearly 474,000 criminal cases in Hampton Roads, Va., found that whites were more likely to get plea deals that resulted in no jail time for drug offenses. While facing charges of drug distribution, 48 percent of whites received plea bargains with no jail time, vs. 22 percent of blacks. Among those with prior criminal records who pleaded guilty to robbery, 36 percent of whites got no jail time, vs. 8 percent of blacks.
A survey of data from the U.S. Sentencing Commission in 2017 found that when black men and white men commit the same crime, black men on average receive a sentence almost 20 percent longer . The research controlled for variables such as age and prior criminal history.
A study published in May 2018 found that when a white person and a black person are convicted of similar crimes, Republican-appointed judges sentence the black person to three months longer in prison.
A 2015 study of first-time felons found that while black men overall received sentences of 270 days longer than white men for similar crimes, the discrepancy between whites and dark-skinned blacks was 400 days.
A 2011 study of bail in five large U.S. counties found that blacks received $7,000 higher bail than whites for violent crimes, $13,000 higher for drug crimes and $10,000 higher for crimes related to public order. These disparities were calculated after adjusting for the seriousness of the crime, criminal history and other variables.
You're living in a fucking fantasy if you deny that America still has a long way to go for racial equity.
The rest of your sad and tired lies aren't worthy of a response if you're unwilling to even admit the mountain of facts in front of your face. And those monuments will be torn down in my life time as they should be, it's just a matter of time which is on progressives side. All the real progress you mention America making, from stomping down the treasonous confederate filth to passing the civil right act, were brought about BY progressives while conservatives fought progress tooth and nail as they continue to do. Thankfully, conservatism always eventually loses because at its core it's nothing but loser ideology clinging to a fantasy image of some fictionalize past.
Thanks for all the "studies" from leftist academia. I could have saved you all the trouble. The people are not stupid. The left has tremendous power right now, but believe it or not, it is fighting for it's life.
Let us both watch what happens.
John, do you notice the word FORMER? That's always there when some fired employee starts badmouthing Trump. Here's the way it works Anyone who was formerly with the Trump Administration is no longer there because they couldn't get anything useful done. Therefore, they will turn on the man who fired them. The term "former employee" is synonymous with the term "disgruntled employee".
Trump's conviction... Cyrus Vance, Jr. will have something to do with that.
I doubt that.
I don't.
We heard the same during the so called "Muller Investigation." One essay writer, was so sure that after we all found out that (I) was right, he never wrote another word here.
Vance .... Vance .... you mean the guy who the NY AG put under investigation for suspicious contributions and mishandling of the Weinstein case?
That Vance?
Here is a question I did not include in the piece:
How many reading this now have been subjected to such teaching, either at work or at school, but are afraid of what would happen if you complained about it?
That is long after my time but last year was the first year since i graduated that i DID NOT give any money back to my college.
Reasons are not CRT related but similar in that it relates to academia being out of control in a general sense.
I don't blame you. The federal government should do the same.
Tuition at our public universities has gone up over 220% in the last twenty years. Far outpacing inflation and wages.
It's completely out of control and something has to be done about it.
"The real crisis is one Obama himself manufactured since taking office.
In 2010, Obama eliminated the federal guaranteed loan program, which let private lenders offer student loans at low interest rates. Now, the Department of Education is the only place to go for such loans.
Obama sold this government takeover as a way to save money — why bear the costs of guaranteeing private loans, he said, when the government could cut out the middleman and lend the money itself?
The cost savings didn't happen. In fact, the Congressional Budget Office just increased its 10-year forecast for the loan program's costs by $27 billion, or 30%.
What did happen was an explosive growth in the amount of federal student loan debt. President Clinton phased in direct federal lending in 1993 as an option, but over the next 15 years the amount of loans was fairly stable. The result of Obama's action is striking. In each of the past six years, federal direct student loan debt has climbed by more than $100 billion. (See chart.)
And since Obama keeps making it easier and easier to avoid repaying those loans, it's a problem that taxpayers will eventually have to shoulder."
That is when colleges & universities went wild with tuition charges.
And it is due to administrative cost. The increase in spending has not improved the education received.
Even our local school district is mulling over furloughs for some employees. And I have to ask, "What the hell for?".They have their budget for the year (read the money is there damnit), there already is a "shortage" of teachers, and they too are top heavy as hell. Bus drivers could be reassigned to cleaning the facilities in the meantime. The priorities suck...........so hard.......
Nope....Not one bit!!!
We know what their real priority is.
That average student loan debt of 20k sounds way too low to me. And that article didn't address the cost end of the equation that i saw. I'm not sure how who offers the loans drives what colleges charge for tuition.
Did i miss that part of the article?
It's from 2015, I'm not sure if the 20k would be so low 5 years ago or the range of schools that would produce such an average. I would imagine some state colleges kept the average low:
I'm not sure how who offers the loans drives what colleges charge for tuition.
Remember what caused the housing meltdown? Private lenders had traditional mortgage standards. You were required to put approx 20% down, have a good credit rating and income to support yourself/family and the mortgage. Then the government decided they wanted to make just about everyone homeowners (or was it minorities or the poor?), so they pressured the banks to lower the standards to the extent that people who couldn't afford it, where buying homes. As we now know, it led to the financial crisis/housing meltdown and the banks took the wrap.
The same with medical billing. If a private insurance company receives a questionable bill, they don't just pay it. They question it. The government doesn't have quite the same motivation.
Do you think it would be easier for universities to raise tuition when dealing with private lenders who are cautious of what someone can afford or when dealing strictly with the government?
I think it's a mixture of several things.
First a lot of public colleges are on a kingdom building campaign in an attempt to attract more students. Colleges that were traditionally only liberal arts colleges are now adding things like Engineering programs. Buildings, labs and staffing cost money.
Second i agree that who does the lending matters but maybe not for the same reasons. I believe colleges have raised tuition to some degree because the government is involved in lending and will keep raising tuition because they feel the Fed will keep liberally doling out the money and more of it. Perhaps the same thing you are saying, i'm not sure.
Lastly college profs are generally getting paid more and doing less than their predecessors. Therefore more of them are needed to teach the same number of students, thus costing more per student.
That said, they better get their shit together or they will go the way of the dodo bird. Bricks and mortar colleges are becoming a antiquated business model the way we knew them. This pandemic is only helping to reinforce that.
Unlike most of the change that takes place in our lives that one sounds like progress.
Bricks and mortar colleges are becoming a antiquated business model the way we knew them. This pandemic is only helping to reinforce that.
I believe that too.
Tucker Carlson is allowed to peddle propaganda because of white privilege. There I said it: now what? Fox News is very choosy about who is selected to move up in the franchise echelon. And yes, Tucker has to exploit blacks and other disadvantaged peoples on a daily basis to keep his slot (and salary) well 'oiled.'
We should all agree that Donald Trump is the living breathing "production" of white privilege, because he skates through his presidency with the support of conservatives who have so far never supported a woman or minority to overrun the system of checks and balances in the Congress or courts. White privilege is on full display when white conservatives—especially so-called, "EVANGELICALS" can not see error and sin for what it is when Trump does it, but can "convene" like an immune system response to thrash minorities for demanding their unalienable rights!
(Some conservatives gave President Barack Obama pure grade HELL for simply doing a damn good job getting the country out of all the crap it was immerse and sinking deeper in.)
Since you bring up Obama, in contrast we should all agree that the Obama's are the living breathing "product" of black privilege. As they jet to their 12 million dollar estate in Martha's Vineyard from their 9 million dollar vacation home in Hawaii and then off to visit the swamp he helped create to their 8 million dollar castle in Washington DC.
Ah yes .... life is good for this family of black privilege. Much better than most of the shamed white liberals who put him there that's for sure ......
Obama makes his money the old fashion way he earns it! You must approve. You can't begrudge him success. After all, he was the leadership that started lifting this country out of a republican-led great recession. Besides, Obama makes money nowadays in-spite of conservatives vying to stop him and in-league with white privilege. After all, it's in his genes and he can access it!
You attempted to ditch the issue at hand.
Donald may be jealous of Barack's success, but Obama's success has no bearing on the expression of white privilege being given Trump and never extended to him!
Trump can do no wrong in his supporters' eyes-Obama was gravely schemed against by some conservatives the night of his first inauguration and the playbook lasted eight years. (Remember the phrase, "Do nothing Congress" it was a reference to yes, you've got it, congressional republicans and conservatives during the Obama years in totality).
Lol .... liberal rationalizations for the filthy rich. The Obama family thanks you for your support from one of their three palatial estates.
This should have been a day one order. The greatest threat to our country is the racist ideology that the race obsessed left has been indoctrinating our students with for decades. It's not about ending racism, or progressing to a color blind society, but rather taking us back to where race is an individuals defining characteristic. Race obsessed democrats view every interaction in their day through through racist eyes and this is how they indoctrinate those moderates who don't share their extremist view. Critical race theory makes the idea of a melting pot America impossible, it wants to go back to the days of segregation, where balkanized groups fight for their own groups interests, rather than any recognition of a common interest as Americans.
IF you want to see where critical race theory leads, look no further than ultra liberal universities, where segregation by race is coming back into fashion. Just yesterday there was a report of students cafes for whites, and non whites at a school in Michigan. It's no coincidence that the most liberal institutions in the country, like Universities, are the most racist. They've been immersed in the toxic racism for decades and continue to indocrinate students with their poison. The more this invidious brain washing is exposed, the better.