╌>

META-phors for META-matters, or, "To Those Who Never META 'Thumbs Down/Dislike' BUTTON they Could Resist"

  

Category:  meta

Via:  community  •  9 years ago  •  156 comments

META-phors for META-matters, or, "To Those Who Never META 'Thumbs Down/Dislike' BUTTON they Could Resist"

This is a Discussion Forum; consequently … discussion, dialogue and debate are the phenomena that sustain it.

Duh!

When dissenting/disparate opinions expressed in a discussion forum are met with summary dismissal as with i.e. the Thumbs Down/Dislike feature, it undermines what? ... come on, you know ... a clue ... it undermines the discussion aspect of that discussion forum.

Yes!

Good!

In the book of Proverbs, META-phorically -- such subterfuge is referred to as "troubling one's own house."

To those who have fallen in love with their red-colored thumb ... let me say, META-phorically, of course, "to a child with a hammer, everything looks like a nail".

Too intellectual? OK ... Let's go with … "Tell a recalcitrant adolescent that it's unhealthy to eat shit ... and first thing ya' know, his head is in the toilet!"

We can have discussions on NT, or, META-phorically speaking, we can have in-your-face-from-the monkey-cage-throwing of-feces. That is, not point-counter-point conversation/discussion, rather (META-phorically), pissin' or poop tossing from the shadows "dialogue".

We moved here to mitigate the adverse effects of (META-phorical) "feces-tossing-head-in-the-toilet-house-troubling-I-can't-come-up-with-viable-rebuttals-so-I'll-quip-from-the-low-road mentality." Let's make our cases and/or debunk the cases of others with well-considered, somewhat articulate efforts … that makes NT look to outsiders and prospective future members, as the classy place it is.

Use the thumbs down button with discretion and have the respect and integrity to once-in-a-while explain why you've used it when you've used it.

Some Primates would surely do so if they could.

Don't just evoke, evolve (yup! Another META-phor … the "evolve" one)

Do I expect this will this generate better community decorum? Of course not; I just wrote it as a (META-phorical) way of "scooping up some of the monkey poop and flinging it back towards the shadowy areas from whence it originated."

I'll have real debates on significant topics with any member who posts one; but if the best someone's got is a "thumb" ... it denigrates the concept and the NT mantra of "Speak Your Mind" (which of course implies the existence thereof within).

'Course, as META-phors go, I could take the advice offered in Matthew 7:6 and just (META-phorically) do the "Emily Litella" thing, that being to consider the source(s) of the issue, realize that (META-phorical) "pissing-into-the-wind" aspect and just say …

"NEVER MIND."*

* Get the double meaning there? NEVER "MIND"?

… never mind.

Heading out for a Flu shot and coffee … in that order.

Back later to see of the "Rule of Thumb" has manifested itself.

 


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
link   seeder  A. Macarthur    9 years ago

META-mucil for the intellectually bound up.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
link   1stwarrior    9 years ago

Better yet- "GET OVER IT".

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
link   seeder  A. Macarthur    9 years ago

Better yet- "GET OVER IT".

Better, better yet, consider how the behavior puts off some of our members.

 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
link   1stwarrior  replied to  A. Macarthur   9 years ago

There are two people bitching bout the "thumbs-up/thumbs-down" - and that is you and John.

You mean "those" members behaviours are being affected??

Fancy that.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
link   JohnRussell  replied to  1stwarrior   9 years ago

Bitching ? ROFL. I think it is stupid, transparently stupid, to put any meaning whatsoever on a "like/dislike" total, and people who use it to "attack" some comment are laughable, but I have not bitched about it. 

I would think that since it is so soon after the start of the site, such a topic of discussion ( that there is an article about the buttons), whatever purpose they were supposed to serve has already been mislaid. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
link   1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell   9 years ago

Jeeeezzzzzz John - you've ruined it.

I agree with you - which brings to question - why the article?

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
link   seeder  A. Macarthur  replied to  1stwarrior   9 years ago

There are two people bitching bout the "thumbs-up/thumbs-down" - and that is you and John.

You mean "those" members behaviours are being affected??

Fancy that.

Fancy this the many members who don't bitch, no longer do so because THEY AVOID THE MALCONTENTS WHO POST VITRIOL AND then (metaphorically) SPIT ON THOSE WHO DARE EXPRESS OPPOSITION!

They LIMIT THEIR ACTIVITY TO FORUMS AND GROUPS where people can agree or disagree both OPENLY and with CIVILITY!

 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
link   1stwarrior  replied to  A. Macarthur   9 years ago

A. Mac - read your comments and the angst you throw out constantly with your multi-colored, bolded, italic'd, underlined continuous tirades against other's opinions.

As a former Union negotiator - think about what you've said, the manner in which it "may" impact others and the way the message is delivered/received.

Think about it.

"Thumbs-up/Thumbs-down"?

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
link   seeder  A. Macarthur  replied to  1stwarrior   9 years ago

A. Mac - read your comments and the angst you throw out constantly with your multi-colored, bolded, italic'd, underlined continuous tirades against other's opinions.

As a former Union negotiator - think about what you've said, the manner in which it "may" impact others and the way the message is delivered/received.

Think about it.

"Thumbs-up/Thumbs-down"?

One more time; the use of font faces/styles/colors have been used in print media ad infinitum when individuals can not communicate in a face-to-face manner. They record emphasis, imply body language and inflection; as a former newspaper editor and a published author, I understand when and why they are incorporated into written discourse.

Ironic that you ask me to think about what I have said, the manner in which I said it and how it impacts others! The very point of having said it, in the manner I said it, was/is about how those on the site who, in unified, tactical an repeated fashion, impact the site negatively by making it near impossible to disagree without RELENTLESS, ANONYMOUS REPUDIATION for doing so.

My negotiating and subsequent enforcement of contractual agreements taught me much about human nature; among the lessons learned was the one that reminded me over and over, that there are individuals in this world who give not shit-number-one about how their self-serving willingness to impose agendas … fouls the good-will efforts of the fair-minded and forthright.

You can think about that. 

For the record, 1st, we strongly disagree BUT I RESPECT YOU FOR PUTTING IT ON THE TABLE SO WE CAN DO SO WITH SPECIFICITY, AND OPENLY. And that's all I ask of those who lack the understanding and/or integrity to do the same.

 

 
 
 
Jerry Verlinger
Freshman Silent
link   Jerry Verlinger  replied to  A. Macarthur   9 years ago

 the use of font faces/styles/colors have been used in print media ad infinitum when individuals can not communicate in a face-to-face manner. They record emphasis, imply body language and inflection; as a former newspaper editor and a published author, I understand when and why they are incorporated into written discourse.

I agree, however some people overemphasize their copy to the point where it becomes a distraction and disrupts the flow of the of the authors' own intent. 

I've noticed that you seem to be fairly skilled at using emphasis in your comments, now I know why.  

 
 
 
Jerry Verlinger
Freshman Silent
link   Jerry Verlinger  replied to  A. Macarthur   9 years ago

This article should be posted in the NewsTalkers Community group. I thought you were a member there Mac, but I don't see  your name on the roster.

If you want to sign on just go to NewsTalkers Community  group. 

 
 
 
Perrie Berlin-Halpern
Freshman Silent
link   Perrie Berlin-Halpern  replied to  Jerry Verlinger   9 years ago

Lets' see if this gives me a message. 

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
link   seeder  A. Macarthur  replied to  Jerry Verlinger   9 years ago

Jerry,

I thought I was a member of the Community Group … I just tried to join but there does not seem to be that option. Can you direct me. 

 
 
 
Jerry Verlinger
Freshman Silent
link   Jerry Verlinger  replied to  A. Macarthur   9 years ago

 I just tried to join but there does not seem to be that option. Can you direct me

I don't know what the problem is with that. I assume it's one of the glitches that Perrie is trying to fix. I'll send her an email and ask her to look into it.

Thanks for the heads up mac.

 
 
 
Jerry Verlinger
Freshman Silent
link   Jerry Verlinger  replied to  A. Macarthur   9 years ago

I thought I was a member of the Community Group

Mac, You are a member of NTC, I was just looking for someone else's name and, wha-la!, there you were! I know you weren't there the other day because I checked the list three times, as I was pretty sure you joined on day one. You even participated in fine tuning the mission statement for NTC.

So I don't know what happened, but anyway it's resolved as far as you being in the group. However, there should have been a "Leave Group" button on the group title banner. (That button would have said "Join Group" if you were not a member) I'll email Perrie an update on the memo I sent her.

 
 
 
Petey Coober
Freshman Silent
link   Petey Coober  replied to  A. Macarthur   9 years ago

that's all I ask of those who lack the understanding and/or integrity to do the same.

Some people use the word integrity as a club to hit with . Just because you are the first to attack that way does NOT mean you have integrity ...

 
 
 
Jerry Verlinger
Freshman Silent
link   Jerry Verlinger  replied to  1stwarrior   9 years ago

".....and the angst you throw out constantly with your multi-colored, bolded, italic'd, underlined continuous tirades against other's opinions ."

That's a pretty funny line. chuckle

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
link   Kavika     9 years ago

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
link   Buzz of the Orient    9 years ago

I've said elsewhere that there's nothing wrong with using thumbs up, which really means agreement or appreciation, and they don't have to be explained, but thumbs down is another story. Granted it can mean disagreement or disapproval, but then there's no explanation of "why", no contrary opinion stated. It can also be used as a form of vengence, a kind of attack, but once again "why". The "why" is rarely explained, but if a logical opposing opinion is stated, then whether or not it's backed up with the thumbs down icon, that is the mature manner of using a form of criticism. Using the thumbs down by itself is childish - just proving one has nothing intelligent to say.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
link   1stwarrior  replied to  Buzz of the Orient   9 years ago

One never knows if an opinion is a "thumbs-down" unless the author of the opposing opinion states so.

I, for one, will utilize up/down for approval/disapproval of thread/content/choice and a reason for either is not necessary - either I like it or I don't.

If I have a differing opinion and I don't like it a lot - I will state it.

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
link   seeder  A. Macarthur  replied to  1stwarrior   9 years ago

If I have a differing opinion and I don't like it a lot - I will state it.

Which is exactly what I'm suggesting should be done; but we have what appears to be an orchestrated effort to hit the thumbs down button on members who do so.

We have a significant number of otherwise active members who won't go to certain other members' articles because they anticipate being insulted there, "disliked" for merely having a dissenting view, without an explanation as to the reason(s), and, "disliked" repeatedly by the same members.

Who are the "hurt egos" in this scenario, the members being "disliked," or, the likely more fragile egos belonging to those who take pot shots from the shadows … perhaps for fear of being seen and being subsequently "disliked" for disliking without caring to, or, having the ability to own their positions?

 

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Quiet
link   Dean Moriarty    9 years ago

I turned off my notifications for thumbs up thumbs down. Don't really give a crap which liberals pushed the button and it doesn't bother me. I wear them as a badge of honor. Perrie said they were supposed to be anonymous anyway. If she didn't want people to use them she wouldn't have added the feature. So far I've only given one thumbs down, I might start using it more often. 

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
link   Perrie Halpern R.A.    9 years ago

On the Ning site, as well as on NV, you could only vote up an item. I remember all to well how comments were obviously voted up by groups of friends, especially if you walked into an article where you were the outsider. When I was doing my homework for this site, I found that a lot of sites that take comments use the vote up/down button. It was like an instant poll. I thought it would be a good and fun thing to have here, so I installed it. 

I don't want it to be used spitefully. It should be a genuine reaction to a comment and not to the individual. 

Remember, any function I have installed, I can remove. My main goal is the health of the community, and anything that interferes with that, I will deal with in the appropriate manner. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
link   JohnRussell  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A.   9 years ago

I think we all know this entire line of discussion is kind of comical. I don't know how people came to the conclusion that I have been bitching about the "like/dislike" button. I know Perrie made a comment in the beginning that I had told her I didn't like it, which is true, and I thought it would be used in a comical way, which is true, but I did not "bitch" about it. I think Perrie knows that the "dislike/like" button is a miniscule consideration to me about this forum. 

There are a few people who dislike comments, or like them I suppose, based on who made the comment being liked or disliked and not necessarily on the content. Such a truth makes the worth of the totals , as an instant poll, pretty much meaningless. 

 
 
 
Jerry Verlinger
Freshman Silent
link   Jerry Verlinger  replied to  JohnRussell   9 years ago

I don't know how people came to the conclusion that I have been bitching about the "like/dislike" button.

Because you're just like me, you bitch about everything, so it was reasonable to assume you would bitch about the like/dislike button. 8^)}

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
link   JohnRussell  replied to  Jerry Verlinger   9 years ago

Jerry feel free to find any comment by me where I bitch about the like dislike button. 

 
 
 
Jerry Verlinger
Freshman Silent
link   Jerry Verlinger  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A.   9 years ago

 I found that a lot of sites that take comments use the vote up/down button. It was like an instant poll.

That's pretty much what the up/down feature is, an instant poll. I find it useful for seeing how strongly other readers feel regarding an opinion.

I also find it useful, when going back over a discussion thread, for telling me a glance whether I've already read the comment.

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
link   seeder  A. Macarthur    9 years ago

Any way you try to explain it or spin it, the butt-hurt over the thumbs down feature is the topic. 

 

I wish i had more positive affirmation.....confused

 

Meta....meta....vomit

 

People just don't behave the way i want them too, people don't like my comments, I am not in control! !#@$!@#$!#$@!#@

Spiteful, intentionally-adverse activity absent of specifically-explained rationale … THWARTS ACTIVITY WHICH HAS A POTENTIAL NEGATIVE IMPACT ON ADVERTISING REVENUE WHICH IN TURN SUPPORTS THE SITE OWNER'S TIME AND EFFORT!

Get it?

Projecting your interpretation does just that; the potential logistical fall out of unsubstantiated negativity, on NT, as in many human interactions, is not constructive. Those who hide behind a button contribute just what in particular to the site?

Got something to say; have the metaphorical testicles to put your name to it and state your case!

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
link   1stwarrior  replied to  A. Macarthur   9 years ago

This is not your site nor is it about you A. Mac.

If Perrie chooses otherwise, you need to support her decisions.

 
 
 
Jerry Verlinger
Freshman Silent
link   Jerry Verlinger  replied to  A. Macarthur   9 years ago

Spiteful, intentionally-adverse activity absent of specifically-explained rationale …

Would you rather someone unhappy with a particular comment spell out their feelings in clear, unadulterated vitriol?

The Dislike  provides a way to express displeasure with a comment without cluttering the thread with negative comments.

 
 
 
Petey Coober
Freshman Silent
link   Petey Coober  replied to  A. Macarthur   9 years ago

Got something to say; have the metaphorical testicles to put your name to it and state your case!

So that's how you think ... with your balls . No wonder you are often so rantacious . Try thinking with your mind ... just a suggestion .

 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
link   sixpick    9 years ago

russian fail animated GIF

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
link   1stwarrior  replied to  sixpick   9 years ago

I wanna see the front.

 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
link   Buzz of the Orient  replied to  sixpick   9 years ago

Now THAT'S a video I CAN open.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
link   Hal A. Lujah    9 years ago

I woke up yesterday morning and had 85 email notifications about my comments being disliked, multiple times by each individual - so clearly the software is malfunctioning.  That was after I had cleared over 100 from the day before.

I don't mind though, and I'm fully aware of how to turn off the email notifications.  Clearing emails is a small price to pay for the opportunity to watch the tiny gears in my opponents' heads spin.  "Oh look, Woodie took the time to hit the thumbs down button eight times on this comment."  It's kinda entertaining.  

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
link   Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Hal A. Lujah   9 years ago

I just had it fixed Hal. I don;t think this will be an issue anymore. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
link   Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A.   9 years ago

Damn.  I was enjoying that.

 
 
 
Al-316
Professor Silent
link   Al-316    9 years ago

Unfortunately, neither my thumbs up or down button work, so I cannot fully express myself on this article.

Personally, I use the thumbs up bottom as a visual indication that I have read and agree with the comment.

My failing to give a thumbs up is, in my mind, enough of a negative message to the author.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
link   Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Al-316   9 years ago

It works for me Al

 
 
 
Nowhere Man
Junior Participates
link   Nowhere Man    9 years ago
(deleted)
 
 
 
Jerry Verlinger
Freshman Silent
link   Jerry Verlinger  replied to  Nowhere Man   9 years ago

It's a lot easier to flip someone the bird rather than address an issue on a real live basis.

The like/dislike button is a simple online flipping the bird when one is too lazy to actually think.

Voting a comment up without commenting is simply a way to show support for an opinion when anything you have to say would only be redundant.

On the other hand, voting a comment down is not "flipping a bird", it's a way to say you don't agree with the comment, and again, anything you have to say would be redundant, or it would only introduce unnecessary and unproductive vitriol to the discussion. 

 
 
 
Jerry Verlinger
Freshman Silent
link   Jerry Verlinger  replied to  Nowhere Man   9 years ago

Wow, arguing over a button on a website......

Really intellectually stimulating there.

I know, every once in awhile you run into a comment that's over your head. You know of course, that I have always been available to help you out when you get confused, so don't hesitate to look me up whenever you need a hand.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
link   Hal A. Lujah    9 years ago

Speaking of META, I now get a message that my 'application is pending'  to be a member of Heated Discussions. Wth is that about?  I've been a member there since I joined NT.

 
 
 
Jerry Verlinger
Freshman Silent
link   Jerry Verlinger  replied to  Hal A. Lujah   9 years ago

 I now get a message that my 'application is pending'  to be a member of Heated Discussions. Wth is that about?

You weren't there?! They voted you out for being too civil.  

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
link   Perrie Halpern R.A.    9 years ago

Let me see what happens. Some one comment to me here. 

 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
link   sixpick  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A.   9 years ago

Has anyone seen Someone?  Tell him/her Perrie wants him/her.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
link   Bob Nelson  replied to  sixpick   9 years ago

Who's on first? 

  crazy

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
link   1stwarrior  replied to  sixpick   9 years ago

Think Someone went to lunch - I'll check the Deli on the way home.

 
 
 
Al-316
Professor Silent
link   Al-316  replied to  1stwarrior   9 years ago

Someone went behind the barn with Anyone about an hour ago. No sign of Eitherone since.

 
 
 
Nowhere Man
Junior Participates
link   Nowhere Man  replied to  Al-316   9 years ago
(deleted)
 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
link   seeder  A. Macarthur    9 years ago

Here's your opportunity …

Give ONLY a THUMBS UP/LIKE or, a THUMBS DOWN/DISLIKE to the following.

• Shall I post the e-mail notifications of all of the THUMBS DOWN/DISLIKES I have personally received since the inception of the new site?

Vote by hitting the button that best expresses your feelings on this idea.*

* Your opinion is important and the resultant votes (the e-mail notifications) may be posted herein at the close of the voting process.**

** Yes … it's a trap.

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Quiet
link   Dean Moriarty  replied to  A. Macarthur   9 years ago

Go ahead and post them. Chances are I will agree with all of them. 

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
link   seeder  A. Macarthur    9 years ago

This is not your site nor is it about you A. Mac.

If Perrie chooses otherwise, you need to support her decisions.

But those who criticize me for broaching the subject, make it about me! Just state in specific terms why the thumbs up feature is good, bad, indifferent, subject to abuse … 

Perrie's decision to include the buttons is not the issue … the issue is whether or not the buttons are being used in a manner in the site's best interest.

(I know you posted this earlier in the day, 1st, I'm just seeing it; once the following feature generates e-mail notifications with links to new comments, this will be resolved).

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
link   Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  A. Macarthur   9 years ago

Another test reply

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
link   seeder  A. Macarthur    9 years ago

Go ahead and post them. Chances are I will agree with all of them. 

Read how to cast your vote … otherwise, of course you will like them.

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
link   seeder  A. Macarthur    9 years ago

Good news … the e-mail notifications that enable members to follow discussions … NOW WORK AND INCLUDE LINKS BACK TO THE FOLLOWED DISCUSSION(S)!

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
link   seeder  A. Macarthur    9 years ago

This article explains how to fluff ones delicate ego. It's continued existence is amazing!

That while enabling members to post multiple misinterpretations.

Win-win!

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
link   seeder  A. Macarthur    9 years ago

I am drawn to the circus act known to us all as Meta. I see that you are above it all as well.

We're all children at heart … we enjoy seeing the …

CLOWN CAR.

You're making it way to easy, BF.

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
link   seeder  A. Macarthur    9 years ago

AMAC, you posted the hurt feelings report and proceeded to defend it as something it's obviously not for an entire day.

Now that's determination!

Bravo!

Your convenient , self-satisfying misinterpretation … your problem.

“Beware of becoming a pawn in your own game.” 
―  Marty Rubin

 
 
 
Randy
Sophomore Quiet
link   Randy    9 years ago

We moved here to mitigate the adverse effects of (META-phorical) "feces-tossing-head-in-the-toilet-house-troubling-I-can't-come-up-with-viable-rebuttals-so-I'll-quip-from-the-low-road mentality."

Didn't change and I didn't expect it to. We can change platforms, but since this is an open forum, we can't get rid of the worst shit flingers. So, no difference. Can't change people.

Oh and I like the up and down buttons and keep my private notes closed so I don't get notified when someone votes one way or another.

I vote thumbs up!

 
 
 
Nowhere Man
Junior Participates
link   Nowhere Man    9 years ago
(deleted)
 
 
 
Perrie Berlin-Halpern
Freshman Silent
link   Perrie Berlin-Halpern    9 years ago

Btw the follow button now works!

 
 
 
Dowser
Sophomore Quiet
link   Dowser    9 years ago

A. Mac, are those your tags on the article, or did someone mess with your article, too?

They're fine, I was just wondering-- they don't seem like you...

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
link   seeder  A. Macarthur    9 years ago

This article … one I posted a month ago, has suddenly arisen from the ashes. I was content to let it stay in the past … but here we are.

Since I did not resurrect it, I'll assume it still has some relevance, and therefore, I will ask about the following …

WHY TF would anyone disagree with/dislike the comment reproduced below, (one that I posted in another thread earlier today)?

The text in blue is a comment made in response to my contention that there are a number of problems with condemning a demographic that is obviously not comprised of a one-size-fits-all population. That I had to make the distinction between NAZIS vs. Germans is troubling to me. 

But please, and I am serious, what could possibly objectionable in the content below?

_______________________________________________________________________________

 

link   11/22/15 10:31:39AM  @A-Macarthur :

So most Nazis were warm and cuddly? Your inability to recognize that the ideology itself espouses violence renders your soundbites illogical.

Think before you make declarations!

A "NAZI" by definition is a violent, ethnic-cleansing piece-of-shit.

If you had thought your condescending, foolish statement through before you posted it, you'd have (possibly) realized that ALL GERMANS WERE NOT NAZIS … JUST LIKE ALL MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS! 

It's the sloppy, one-size-fits-all stupidity that just drives me crazy!

FYI: The way you stereotype all MUSLIMS, is the way the NAZIS stereotyped all Jews and their other targets -- 

Antisemitic  propaganda was a common theme in Nazi propaganda, although it was occasionally reduced for  tactical  reasons, such as for the  1936 Olympic Games . It was a recurring topic in Hitler's book  Mein Kampf , published in the 1920s, and was thus a natural component of nazi ideology.

Early in his membership in the Nazi Party, Hitler presented the Jews as behind all of Germany's moral and economic problems,   as featuring in both Bolshevism and international capitalism. [1]  He blamed "money-grubbing Jews" for all of Weimar Germany's economic problems. [2]  He also drew upon the antisemitic elements of the  stab-in-the-back legend  to explain the defeat in World War I and to justify their views as self-defense. [3]  In one speech, when Hitler asked who was behind Germany's failed war efforts, the audience erupted with "The Jews." [1]

 

 

REPLY  

  

 
 
Why a thumbs down for this?
__________________________________________________________
 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Quiet
link   Dean Moriarty  replied to  A. Macarthur   9 years ago

You start out with an insult. I can see the reason for the thumbs down. 

"Think before you make declarations!"

Then you add a second insult for the icing on the cake.

"It's the sloppy, one-size-fits-all stupidity that just drives me crazy!"

 

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
link   seeder  A. Macarthur  replied to  Dean Moriarty   9 years ago

You start out with an insult. I can see the reason for the thumbs down. 

"Think before you make declarations!"

Then you add a second insult for the icing on the cake.

"It's the sloppy, one-size-fits-all stupidity that just drives me crazy!"

The reason for the comment was followed with the specifics as to why. 

In my career, I opened many arguments with disparaging commentary, then immediately validated the basis for each.

When a particularly ill-conceived notion is posited … PARTICULARLY AS AN ATTEMPT TO REBUT A SENSIBLE one, the recipient of the indignation he evoked can either acknowledge that he stands corrected, or double down on his ignorance.

I get your point, Dean. But rather than merely objecting to my "one-size-fits-all" assessment of broad-brush stereotyping-demonizing-demagoguery of ethnic groups, explain why you think it's not accurate … unless you agree but would rather not say because it erodes your explanation.

 
 

Who is online





Gazoo


452 visitors