╌>

Trump Blasts 'SNL' as 'Democratic Spin Machine,' Hints at Legal Action Against Networks' 'One Sided Coverage'

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  pj  •  6 years ago  •  129 comments

Trump Blasts 'SNL' as 'Democratic Spin Machine,' Hints at Legal Action Against Networks' 'One Sided Coverage'

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


President Donald Trump on Sunday again blasted "Saturday Night Live" and what he called "one sided coverage" on networks like NBC, hinting at legal action to battle "Democratic spin machines."

"A REAL scandal is the one sided coverage, hour by hour, of networks like NBC & Democrat spin machines like Saturday Night Live," Trump tweeted on Sunday morning. "It is all nothing less than unfair news coverage and Dem commercials. Should be tested in courts, can't be legal? Only defame & belittle! Collusion?"



Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
A REAL scandal is the one sided coverage, hour by hour, of networks like NBC & Democrat spin machines like Saturday Night Live. It is all nothing less than unfair news coverage and Dem commercials. Should be tested in courts, can’t be legal? Only defame & belittle! Collusion?


It's not clear why the president felt that an entertainment show like "Saturday Night Live" constituted "news coverage" or what legal grounds he would have to block networks from acting since Ronald Reagan's FCC in 1987 eliminated the fairness doctrine that required networks to provide balanced coverage of political issues.

Saturday night's episode of "SNL," the last new show of 2018, saw Alec Baldwin return to the show to play the president in a sketch that spoofed the movie "It's a Wonderful Life," showing Trump what would have happened if he hadn't won the 2016 election.

"SNL" cast members played members of Trump's cabinet, with Sarah Sanders doing public relations for Facebook in the alternate timeline and Vice President Mike Pence getting a post-politics job as a DJ.

"Wow, everyone looks so different," Baldwin's Trump said. "What are those things on their faces?"
To which Kenan Thompson's angel responded, "Those are smiles."

The real Trump, meanwhile, pivoted on Twitter from suggesting that "SNL"'s satire should be "tested in the courts" to lashing out against his former lawyer Michael Cohen, who was sentenced to three years in prison last week for violating campaign finance laws by paying off two women — former adult-film star Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal — to stay silent about alleged sexual encounters with Trump (he has denied having affairs with either woman).

"Remember, Michael Cohen only became a "Rat" after the FBI did something which was absolutely unthinkable & unheard of until the Witch Hunt was illegally started," Trump tweeted. "They BROKE INTO AN ATTORNEY'S OFFICE! Why didn't they break into the DNC to get the Server, or Crooked's [Hillary Clinton's] office?"

Cohen replied to Trump's Twitter attacks in a speech given during his sentencing.

"Recently, the President tweeted a statement calling me 'weak,' and he was correct, but for a much different reason than he was implying," Cohen said. "It was because time and time again I felt it was my duty to cover up his dirty deeds rather than to listen to my own inner voice and my moral compass."


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
1  seeder  PJ    6 years ago
It's not clear why the president felt that an entertainment show like "Saturday Night Live" constituted "news coverage" or what legal grounds he would have to block networks from acting since Ronald Reagan's FCC in 1987 eliminated the fairness doctrine that required networks to provide balanced coverage of political issues.
 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
1.1  sandy-2021492  replied to  PJ @1    6 years ago
It's not clear why the president felt that an entertainment show like "Saturday Night Live" constituted "news coverage"

It's pretty clear to me why - he's an idiot.

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
1.1.1  seeder  PJ  replied to  sandy-2021492 @1.1    6 years ago

Yeah - this has got to be the easiest year for SNL writers.  

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
1.1.2  sandy-2021492  replied to  PJ @1.1.1    6 years ago

I'd say they're at risk of unemployment.  Who needs writers when the jokes write themselves?

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
1.1.3  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  PJ @1.1.1    6 years ago
this has got to be the easiest year for SNL writers.  

LOL as they openly admit. 

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
1.1.4  Rmando  replied to  PJ @1.1.1    6 years ago

"this has got to be the easiest year for SNL writers."

Sure. They just regurgitate left wing talking points and run a biased unfunny "satire" that alienates millions of viewers.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
1.1.5  MrFrost  replied to  Rmando @1.1.4    6 years ago
that alienates millions of viewers.

Yet they are still on the air. 

Enjoy! 

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
1.1.6  Rmando  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.5    6 years ago

There's no accounting for bad taste.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
1.1.7  MrFrost  replied to  Rmando @1.1.6    6 years ago
There's no accounting for bad taste.

There's no accounting for a lack of a sense of humor either. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.8  devangelical  replied to  Rmando @1.1.4    6 years ago
a biased unfunny "satire" that alienates millions of viewers

millions that must either watch to become alienated or are too stupid to change the channel

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
1.1.9  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.7    6 years ago

jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.10  Trout Giggles  replied to  Rmando @1.1.4    6 years ago

Did you see this particular skit?

It was fucking funny

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.1.11  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Rmando @1.1.6    6 years ago
There's no accounting for bad taste.

Too true, and as we can all see, the Trump family is a veritable cornucopia of bad taste.

I wonder what conservatives would have made of this tweet if it had been President Obama:

"A REAL scandal is the one sided coverage, hour by hour, of networks like FOX & Republican spin machines like Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson. It is all nothing less than unfair news coverage and Rep commercials. Should be tested in courts, can’t be legal? Only defame & belittle! Collusion?"

I have a feeling we would have heard screams from conservatives claiming a violation of freedom of speech, trying to silence conservative voices, prejudice, discrimination, possibly impeachment for comments threatening the 1st amendment. The hypocrisy of conservative Republicans knows no bounds.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
1.1.12  Gordy327  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.5    6 years ago

Still on the air for over 40 years too. 

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
1.1.13  Rmando  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.11    6 years ago

Kind of like how the left refuses to admit networks like CNN and MSNBC are propaganda networks working right out of the DNC? Kind of like the way they scream for the Fairness Doctrine to be brought back because nobody wants to listen to left wing talk radio and they can't compete? I'd love to see liberals reaction to Fox News having exclusive airport contracts where passengers are captive audiences and the airports aren't even allowed to control the tv volume.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.14  Trout Giggles  replied to  Rmando @1.1.13    6 years ago

You really do want to see state run TV, don't you?

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
1.1.16  Rmando  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.14    6 years ago

"You really do want to see state run TV, don't you?"

No, but I wouldn't mind the usage of the word "news" being defined and regulated to stop propaganda smear outlets like CNN from being able to use it.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
1.1.17  Gordy327  replied to  Rmando @1.1.13    6 years ago
Kind of like how the left refuses to admit networks like CNN and MSNBC are propaganda networks

What about FOX?

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
1.1.18  arkpdx  replied to  Gordy327 @1.1.17    6 years ago

Fox is not a left wing propaganda site. 

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
1.1.19  Gordy327  replied to  arkpdx @1.1.18    6 years ago
Fox is not a left wing propaganda site. 

No, it's just a right wing propaganda site. Same difference.

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
1.1.20  Rmando  replied to  Gordy327 @1.1.19    6 years ago

FOX actually has people with differing opinions on it even if they are sometimes outnumbered. It's rare to see any real conservative on CNN unless it's washed up Never Trumpers who are no different from liberals anymore.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
1.1.21  arkpdx  replied to  Gordy327 @1.1.19    6 years ago

So then you admit that the others are left wing propaganda organizations. 

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
1.1.22  Gordy327  replied to  arkpdx @1.1.21    6 years ago

Most major news organizations are propaganda machines, more interested in ratings, sensationalism, and beating other organizations than actual journalism or facts.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
1.1.23  Gordy327  replied to  Rmando @1.1.20    6 years ago

That doesn't mean it doesn't have a bias or agenda.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.24  Trout Giggles  replied to  Rmando @1.1.16    6 years ago

You're actually a scary kind of person if you want news regulated. Canada regulates news, that's why Fox is outlawed there. You want to be Canada?

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
1.1.25  Jasper2529  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.24    6 years ago
Canada regulates news, that's why Fox is outlawed there.

Fox News Banned in Canada?

False

Since at least 2011, rumors have circulated claiming the Fox News television channel has been banned in Canada due to their running afoul of Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission ( CRTC ) prohibitions that make it “illegal to broadcast lies and label it news”:



The ruling

The meme claims that Fox News is "banned from operating in Canada" because it violates a law that "prevents ‘news’ channels from lying to their viewers."

That’s incorrect.

Fox was denied broadcast in 2003, but not because Canadians found it to be untruthful.   And Fox News got its approval to broadcast via satellite in 2004 and certainly has a dish presence up north today.

This claim rates Pants on Fire.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
1.1.28  Jasper2529  replied to  Rmando @1.1.20    6 years ago
FOX actually has people with differing opinions on it even if they are sometimes outnumbered. It's rare to see any real conservative on CNN unless it's washed up Never Trumpers who are no different from liberals anymore.

Juan Williams and Tucker Carlson who are registered Democrats. Shepard Smith definitely leans left. 

You are correct when you say that FOX has many people with differing opinions on their shows. That's what I appreciate about the network - it's much more open minded than one-view CNN and MSNBC.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.29  Trout Giggles  replied to  Jasper2529 @1.1.25    6 years ago

Congratulations.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
1.1.30  Jasper2529  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.29    6 years ago
Congratulations.

Thank you, but all I did was post well-known facts so everyone had a chance to read them.  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.31  Trout Giggles  replied to  Jasper2529 @1.1.30    6 years ago

Congratulations on admitting snopes is legitimate

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
1.1.32  Jasper2529  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.31    6 years ago
Congratulations on admitting snopes is legitimate

In comment  1.1.25  I did not say that Snopes is a legitimate fact-checking source. What I have found, however, is that on rare occasions  Snopes posts factual information, but I always verify through other sources. That's why I supported Snopes with PolitiFact. I could have posted more sources, but I felt that 2 were enough.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.33  Trout Giggles  replied to  Jasper2529 @1.1.32    6 years ago

uh-huh

sure

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
1.1.34  Jasper2529  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.33    6 years ago
uh-huh sure

Comments  1.1.25   and  1.1.32  are available for all to read, but believe what you wish. Ciao.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.35  Trout Giggles  replied to  Jasper2529 @1.1.34    6 years ago

See ya!

 
 
 
NV-Robin6
Professor Silent
1.1.36  NV-Robin6  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.11    6 years ago

That is a damn fact! Best 2 years in many for SNL because you can't make this up! Trump and company deserve every bit of scrutiny and ridicule.  

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
1.2  epistte  replied to  PJ @1    6 years ago
t's not clear why the president felt that an entertainment show like "Saturday Night Live" constituted "news coverage" or what legal grounds he would have to block networks from acting since Ronald Reagan's FCC in 1987 eliminated the fairness doctrine that required networks to provide balanced coverage of political issues.

Trump's skin is so thin that he can not tolerate people parodying him.  SNL isn't a news show so the fairness doctrine wouldn't apply to it.

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
1.2.1  seeder  PJ  replied to  epistte @1.2    6 years ago

Exactly.  He doesn't even realize that he has the power to change it by simply changing his behavior....

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  epistte @1.2    6 years ago

Fairness Doctrine.....

.....be careful what you wish for, right wingers......

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2  MrFrost    6 years ago

SNL was on the air long before trump and they will be on the air a long time after trump is gone. 

Funny how trump always whines and cries about people being, "too PC", but as soon as someone or something slams him he cries like a baby about it. 

384

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
2.1  Rmando  replied to  MrFrost @2    6 years ago

Right.... Because the left always takes it in stride when someone ridicules Hillary or Obama. You all threw a fit when when a rodeo clown wore an Obama mask, for crying out loud.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
2.1.1  sandy-2021492  replied to  Rmando @2.1    6 years ago

Did Obama throw a hissy fit over it?

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
2.1.2  Rmando  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2.1.1    6 years ago

He didn't need to. He had his minions to do it for him. And the guy was fired for offending thin skinned liberals.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
2.1.4  sandy-2021492  replied to  Rmando @2.1.2    6 years ago

So, he didn't.

Trump is showing he's at least as thin-skinned as you're accusing liberals of being, and his thin skin compels him to reveal his ignorance to the world.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
2.1.5  Split Personality  replied to  Rmando @2.1.2    6 years ago
Officials on Monday apologized for the incident, which drew condemnation from elected officials on both sides of the aisle. They said they are reviewing whether to take any actions against the Missouri Rodeo Cowboy Association, the contractor who organized the Saturday rodeo event.

The president of the rodeo cowboy association — who doubled as rodeo announcer at the event Saturday — said on Monday he was not aware that a “rogue rodeo clown” planned to stage the performance.

“The rodeo clown did an act that was not in the script, it was not approved by the board of directors of MCRA and it was not appropriate,” rodeo association president Mark Ficken told NBC affiliate KSHB in Kansas City, Mo. “We extend our apologies to the Missouri State Fair. Rodeo is not a political platform and will not be again. We are taking disciplinary action.”

Albert S. Watkins, Ficken’s attorney, said Monday that the unidentified clown was acting on his own volition — and that it was the clown, wearing a microphone, who made comments that energized the crowd, and not his client.

I read 6 related articles. No one apologized to Obama and the President's reactions were not mentioned.

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
2.1.6  Rmando  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2.1.4    6 years ago

So how many people have gotten fired from SNL because Trump was offended? The last I checked the answer is 0.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
2.1.7  Split Personality  replied to  Rmando @2.1.6    6 years ago

SNL isn't the Boy Scout jamboree or a State Fair performance, both of which are explicitly billed, run and maintained as non partisan.

Can you find any articles where a former President complained about being insulted?

Not even being hung or burned in effigy has prompted comments from sitting Presidents.

obama_bin_laden_protest.jpg?itok=beKoJ3b

Earlier this week, comedian Kathy Griffin published a video and photos of her holding a decapitated effigy of President Trump. Regardless of where you fall on the political spectrum, most agree that the disturbing display was done in extremely poor taste.

TMZ reported that Trump's 11-year-old son, Barron, was very upset by the images, prompting even more condemnation from both sides of the partisan aisle.

However, in the discourse that followed, conservatives appear to have forgotten their history in the treatment of Barack Obama during his presidency.

"It's amazing how the left, particularly Hollywood, have no limits to their cruelty and hatred. What would they say if that happened to Obama," wrote one commentator on Twitter.

"Kathy Griffin holds mock-up of Trump's decapitated head & liberals call it ‘art.’ If any conservative did this to Obama they'd be arrested," Tweeted another.

 

Despite the claims from conservatives, the reality is that Obama did face this type of treatment during his presidency and worse.

Last year, I wrote an article about how “Obama’s presidency was marked by effigies of our first black president hanging from nooses across the country ... or being burned around the world.”

For example, there is currently a 54-minute video on YouTube entitled Nationwide Burning of Effigies and Images of President Hussein Obama , published by a group called Stand Up America Now. 

The video opens with two effigies of Obama hanging from nooses with a fake gravestone in the background that reads “OBAMA DEAD,” as well as a church and an upside-down flag.

Following presentations from multiple speakers at the event, the video concludes with a white man in sunglasses using a propane torch to light the Obama effigies on fire, prompting a round of applause and cheers from the crowd.

Sasha Obama was 11-years-old when this display was published.

Where was the conservative outrage when this happened? Or when the same group burned 2,998 Korans less than one year later?

This group asserted their first amendment rights for political and artistic speech and they weren’t alone.

Ted Nugent threatened to kill Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton during an onstage rant. Effigies of Obama were burned at a bar in Milwaukee ; as well as hung from a tree at the University of Kentucky ; a building in Plains , Ga.; and a noose in the front yard of a home in Moreno Valley , Calif.

In explaining the catalyst for his Obama effigy, one man from Fairfield , Ohio, said that he didn’t want “an African American running the country.”

Americans have a long history of citizens committing violence against president effigies to voice political dissent. 

James Madison , John Tyler , Abraham Lincoln , Woodrow Wilson , Richard Nixon , Gerald Ford , and Jimmy Carter were all burned in effigy during their presidencies. And each time this happened, the offending party leaders repudiated the distasteful and disrespectful actions of their constituents.

Ultimately, it is important to understand our history so we can learn from it and develop bipartisan empathy moving forward.

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
2.1.8  Rmando  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.5    6 years ago

So an entertainer should apologize for making fun of the president according to you? Thanks for proving my point about the left being thin skinned.

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
2.1.9  Rmando  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.7    6 years ago

"SNL isn't the Boy Scout jamboree or a State Fair performance, both of which are explicitly billed, run and maintained as non partisan."

So NBC and SNL do bill themselves as partisan and anyone who is not a liberal Democrat need not watch? I'm pretty sure their marketing dept would disagree with you on that. I never said Obama himself would complain about his critics. I clearly said his minions did and still do that for him. But I find it ironic that the party that claims its for working people has no problem with a rodeo clown getting fired for daring to poke fun at Obama.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
2.1.10  Split Personality  replied to  Rmando @2.1.9    6 years ago

He violated his contract with the Sate Fair, end of discussion.  No parties involved other than the employer and the employee.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
2.1.11  Split Personality  replied to  Rmando @2.1.6    6 years ago

Most of the people fired from SNL go on to become superstars

but apparently they tend to get fired for pissing off the boss

not making fun of public figures and events.

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
2.1.12  Rmando  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.10    6 years ago

Oh, so every decision by an employer and every contract signed is above reproach and criticism? And the bitter complaining by the left didn't influence their decision? If a left winger was fired for something so petty they'd be launching a social media campaign in spite of any contract.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.1.13  MrFrost  replied to  Rmando @2.1    6 years ago
Hillary or Obama

1) Hillary was never president, no matter how much you wanted her to be.

2) Were either of these two mentioned in the article? 

3) Deflect much? 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.1.14  MrFrost  replied to    6 years ago
Yes he did!

Proof? Link? 

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
2.1.15  Rmando  replied to  MrFrost @2.1.13    6 years ago

It's odd how every time the same standards are applied to Hillary or Obama it's written off as deflection. I guess that means the double standard isn't worth defending.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.1.16  MrFrost  replied to  Rmando @2.1    6 years ago
Because the left

I was unaware that the left was screaming for people to be less PC. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
2.1.17  Split Personality  replied to  Rmando @2.1.8    6 years ago

You conclusion appears to be based on nothing that I wrote.

Well done!  jrSmiley_84_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
2.1.18  sandy-2021492  replied to  Rmando @2.1.6    6 years ago
So how many people have gotten fired from SNL because Trump was offended? The last I checked the answer is 0.

Ditto for Obama.  He didn't call for the guy to be fired.  As far as I could find, he didn't say anything about the incident.  He has the good sense to know that 1) the rodeo clown has freedom of speech and 2) any response by Obama would have been fanning the flames.

Every time Trump bitches about SNL, he's giving them free advertising, but he doesn't have the sense or self-control to stop.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
2.1.19  Split Personality  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2.1.18    6 years ago
Every time Trump bitches about SNL, he's giving them free advertising,

Cha Ching !!!

Exactly.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.1.20  cjcold  replied to  Rmando @2.1.15    6 years ago

Both Hillary and Obama laughed at being roasted at the correspondents dinners and had good times.

Trump scowled and left early when it was his turn; Never to return. He has emotional problems.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
2.1.21  Split Personality  replied to  cjcold @2.1.20    6 years ago

Exactly.

Same reason this years White House Christmas (Xmas) Party for the Press was cancelled.

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
2.1.22  Rmando  replied to  cjcold @2.1.20    6 years ago

"Both Hillary and Obama laughed at being roasted at the correspondents dinners and had good times."

First of all Hillary doesn't have a sense of humor or any other normal human emotions as far as I can tell and any laughter from her is completely forced and unnatural. Secondly the jokes aimed at them weren't mean spirited or based on their appearance. The jokes from the left aimed at Sarah Sanders and Ivanka Trump have been very personal and tasteless, including mocking their appearance and making jokes about incest. The left has no sense of decency or restraint anymore.

 
 
 
NV-Robin6
Professor Silent
2.1.23  NV-Robin6  replied to  Rmando @2.1    6 years ago

[Removed

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
2.1.24  Jasper2529  replied to  NV-Robin6 @2.1.23    6 years ago
You guys threw that first lowlife punch.  The shit you threw, the sickening disrespect mostly because Obama was black. 

Really? How quickly you've forgotten former Sen. Joe Biden's description of former Sen. Obama. Here are Biden's own bigoted, racist words on a CNN video from 2007:

"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate, bright, and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a story book, man."

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.25  Trout Giggles  replied to  Jasper2529 @2.1.24    6 years ago

Mr Obama must not have been too upset by it. Look at where Mr Biden ended up

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
2.1.26  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Rmando @2.1    6 years ago

Trump is so full of himself, he hung a bucket on his ass to catch the overflow.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.1.27  Kavika   replied to  Paula Bartholomew @2.1.26    6 years ago

LOL

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
3  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu     6 years ago

One thing I will say about this man being president every day he comes up with something new.

To shake one's head about. 

jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

 

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
4  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu     6 years ago

Let Trump be trump 

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
5  seeder  PJ    6 years ago

At first glance the article is funny but it has a serious component to the story.  Donald Trump using his position to threaten the first amendment.  

He simply doesn't understand our Constitution or our country for that matter.  

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
5.1  sandy-2021492  replied to  PJ @5    6 years ago

Agreed.  He's ignorant, and content to remain so.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
5.2  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  PJ @5    6 years ago

I believe trump looks as this as a job. One where he's the boss.

and not much more.

Furthermore I don think trump is honored to have the job, more like we should be damn grateful he's doing it. 

All sad and troubling to me. 

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
5.2.1  seeder  PJ  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @5.2    6 years ago
I believe trump looks as this as a job. One where he's the boss.and not much more.

I think you have highlighted a big part of the problem with Trump's view of the Presidency.  He think's we work for him and not the other way around.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
5.2.2  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  PJ @5.2.1    6 years ago
He think's we work for him and not the other way around.

He's just being trump. It's all he can be. I dont see it ever changing. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
5.2.3  MrFrost  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @5.2.2    6 years ago
He's just being trump.

True...but that's an incredibly low bar. 

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
5.2.4  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  MrFrost @5.2.3    6 years ago
an incredibly low bar

Depending on what, whose or which dictatorial standards I guess.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
5.2.5  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @5.2    6 years ago
Furthermore I don think trump is honored to have the job, more like we should be damn grateful he's doing it. 

I agree bigly.

In his book, Time to get Tough, Trump said, "The same assets that excite me in the chase, often, once they are acquired, leave me bored.  For me, you see, the important thing is the getting, not the having.

He's his own imbecilic Captain Obvious. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
5.2.6  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @5.2.5    6 years ago

He’s a Dick

and can’t go to prison soon enough

and hopefully he rots and dies there

pretty much the whole family deserves to Rot

With Barron being the exception

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
5.2.7  MrFrost  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @5.2.4    6 years ago

Either way.. LOL

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
5.2.8  lennylynx  replied to  igknorantzrulz @5.2.6    6 years ago

Tiffany's ok too, stays away from her nutty family.

 
 
 
NV-Robin6
Professor Silent
5.2.9  NV-Robin6  replied to  MrFrost @5.2.3    6 years ago

Too low bar to ever be Potus!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  PJ @5    6 years ago
serious component to the story.  Donald Trump using his position to threaten the first amendment.  

That's exactly it and this should send shivers down everyone's spines

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
6  Kavika     6 years ago

In this instance Trump is right. He should sue the ''National Enquirer'' and his buddy Pecker for throwing him under the bus.  jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
6.1  seeder  PJ  replied to  Kavika @6    6 years ago

Interesting.....a dick fucked by a pecker.  

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
6.1.1  sandy-2021492  replied to  PJ @6.1    6 years ago

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
6.1.2  MrFrost  replied to  PJ @6.1    6 years ago

News headline:

"Trump Fears Leaking Pecker." 

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
6.1.3  sandy-2021492  replied to  MrFrost @6.1.2    6 years ago

Stop!  You're killin' me!

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
6.1.4  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  MrFrost @6.1.2    6 years ago
News headline: "Trump Fears Leaking Pecker." 

LOL That's one headline I'll avoid the video for. 

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
7  Rmando    6 years ago

SNL is a sad little relic of a show that used to be entertaining for entertaining for everyone.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
7.1  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Rmando @7    6 years ago

many conservatives never did like that show. 

It's always been "edgy" 

Now it just writes itself. 

Art imitating life. trump's

I'm kindas surprised trump hasn't tried to turn this to his advantage somehow. 

He'd do a good spoof on himself. Ratings would go up and all would be happy.

AS SLN Would say... "Na gonna happen !"  ....lol   

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
7.1.1  Rmando  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @7.1    6 years ago

SNL used to have a much fairer and even humor where both sides were equally lampooned. Lots of Republicans enjoyed Bush 41 being impersonated by Dana Carvey, including Bush himself. Now the show not only outright insults Trump but also any of his supporters. The show is being fueled solely by TDS and its sufferers who look for constant reenforcement of their delusions.

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
7.1.2  seeder  PJ  replied to  Rmando @7.1.1    6 years ago

You are missing the obvious.

Previously those being spoofed could laugh along because the spoof was so far beyond reality.

The reason why it seems so hateful is because it's basically the truth and really can't be called a spoof or comedy.

So, in closing, the questions isn't why has SNL become so left leaning.  The question is why has the right become so fucked up.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
7.1.3  MrFrost  replied to  Rmando @7.1.1    6 years ago

Trump is a virtual gold mine of material for SNL, (and every late night talk show host), not their fault trump is a buffoon. Maybe trump should act like an adult and he wouldn't be such an easy target. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
7.1.4  Ender  replied to  Rmando @7.1.1    6 years ago
where both sides were equally lampooned

SNL has a bit of political humor. As all three branches of government are currently run by the gop, what do you expect? For them to ignore the party that has complete control?

Now the show not only outright insults Trump but also any of his supporters

When trump and his supporters stop outright insulting others, maybe the same will be returned. It amazes me the blinders some people put on in support of the nastiest most vile president we have ever had.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
7.1.5  epistte  replied to  Rmando @7.1.1    6 years ago
SNL used to have a much fairer and even humor where both sides were equally lampooned. Lots of Republicans enjoyed Bush 41 being impersonated by Dana Carvey, including Bush himself. Now the show not only outright insults Trump but also any of his supporters. The show is being fueled solely by TDS and its sufferers who look for constant reenforcement of their delusions.

George W. Bush, despite his many policy failures and Bushisms, looks like Plato compared to the mango Mussolini.  Dan Quayle was a idiot but even he was preferred to the Trumpster fire administration. 

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
7.1.6  Rmando  replied to  Ender @7.1.4    6 years ago

I don't recall Trump calling his opponents supporters "deplorables" or promising to fire coal miners. Nor he did call others "bitter clingers" or said law enforcement "behaved stupidly". I do recall Trump promising jobs, fair trade and secure borders. If you want to consider that insulting then go ahead.

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
7.1.7  Rmando  replied to  epistte @7.1.5    6 years ago

"George W. Bush, despite his many policy failures and Bushisms, looks like Plato compared to the mango Mussolini. Dan Quayle was a idiot but even he was preferred to the Trumpster fire administration."

I seem to recall the left calling Bush incompetent, an election stealer and a war criminal. I wouldn't be surprised in ten or twenty years the left will look back on Trump with favor compared to whoever is GOP president at the time. The left is known for its hysterics.

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
7.1.8  SteevieGee  replied to  Rmando @7.1.1    6 years ago
SNL used to have a much fairer and even humor where both sides were equally lampooned.

The Trump presidency is all about Trump.  He's created it that way.  It's the way he likes it.  The Donald Trump Show.  The satire will also be all about Trump.  When you're the star of the show you get all the cameras.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
7.1.9  epistte  replied to  Rmando @7.1.7    6 years ago
I seem to recall the left calling Bush incompetent, an election stealer and a war criminal.

Apparently, you weren't paying attention because I argued that he was a war criminal because of the 2003 Iraq invasion.  Bush v. Gore and the debacle in Ohio in 2004 strongly suggests that he was not legitimately elected. 

I wouldn't be surprised in ten or twenty years the left will look back on Trump with favor compared to whoever is GOP president at the time. The left is known for its hysterics.

Who will the GOP nominate that could possibly be worse than Donald Trump?

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
7.1.10  Split Personality  replied to  Rmando @7.1.7    6 years ago
The left is known for its hysterics.

Probably true for either party, but Presidents usually stay far, far above the fray.

Not Trump, here are his top 550 insults to people places and things, regardless of party affiliation, JUST FROM Twitter.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
7.1.11  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Split Personality @7.1.10    6 years ago
Trump, here are his top 550 insults

Trumps tools, Insults, grandiose promises, intimidation and threats, 

Once he became president he added the victim card. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
7.2  MrFrost  replied to  Rmando @7    6 years ago
SNL is a sad little relic

Trump seems to watch it quite a bit. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
7.2.1  Split Personality  replied to  MrFrost @7.2    6 years ago

True ...

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
7.2.2  Thrawn 31  replied to  MrFrost @7.2    6 years ago

Shit, he watches it more than I do, I haven't watched since high school.

 
 
 
NV-Robin6
Professor Silent
7.3  NV-Robin6  replied to  Rmando @7    6 years ago

Whaaaaaaa! Don't like, don't watch!

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
8  lady in black    6 years ago

Poor wittle orange conman traitor in chief needs a depends change, a blankie, a bottle and a safe space from big ole bad SNL

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
9  lennylynx    6 years ago

In a way, it's kind of pointless doing a parody of Trump.  Like Sarah Palin, Trump makes a joke of himself constantly.  No parody required.

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
9.1  96WS6  replied to  lennylynx @9    6 years ago

Funny that most on the left don't feel that way about Cortez, Isn't it?

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
10  96WS6    6 years ago

Regardless of how Biased they are he can'tdo anything about it unless laws are broken.  Sad how many cheer it though, it is getting to the point where there is no conservative news sources on MSM anymore. There is a name for when you are constanty being presented only one side of a story combined with biased opinions.  It'called brainwashing and you can tell it's working when the sheeple that let it happen to them get irate when you point it out.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
10.1  sandy-2021492  replied to  96WS6 @10    6 years ago

Do you watch SNL for unbiased news?

 
 
 
NV-Robin6
Professor Silent
10.2  NV-Robin6  replied to  96WS6 @10    6 years ago

Oh yeah, every news outlet across the globe except Fox is complicit, dontcha know./s

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
10.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  96WS6 @10    6 years ago
it is getting to the point where there is no conservative news sources on MSM anymore.

When in the fuck was SNL EVER news? 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
10.3.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Thrawn 31 @10.3    6 years ago

Geez, Thrawn! Weekend Update!

Get with it, Man!

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
11  Thrawn 31    6 years ago
Should be tested in courts, can’t be legal? Only defame & belittle! Collusion?

And people seriously defend this guy. He is an absolute, demostrable retard and yet he has millions of defenders. It blows my mind, it truly does. Many of these same people said Obama wasn't qualified, yet defend to the end a guy who doesn't even have the most basic understanding of the First Amendment. 

 
 

Who is online



477 visitors