Jim Crow 2.0: Big Tech’s Separate And Unequal Treatment Of Christians And Conservatives

  
Via:  make-america-great-again  •  2 months ago  •  18 comments

Jim Crow 2.0: Big Tech’s Separate And Unequal Treatment Of Christians And Conservatives
This is dangerous. Where are all the alleged “civil rights” groups on this blatant discrimination? They’re silent on this rampant censorship, because it’s their leftist ideology that’s being protected. These same “progressives” demanded that a baker from Colorado had to be “Open to All” and serve everyone and every event. Yet the world’s largest public platforms flaunt their separate and unequal treatment and denial of services to online users every single day. It’s Jim Crow 2.0.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Big Tech always preaches about treating people equally, but they never do. Funny how their “algorithms” never seem to suspend liberals’ accounts. The religion of Inclusion is a fraud. As I write this, my organization’s Twitter account (@LifeHasPurpose) has been suspended for 15 days for violating their cardinal rule—don’t tweet the truth. 

On April 13th we responded to Representative Ilhan Omar’s (D) outrageous diminishment of 9-11 in a speech to CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) saying “some people did something.” CAIR has been designated, by the way, as a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates. Twitter absurdly accused us of “hateful conduct” for these words: “She describes an act of war as ‘some people did something’? #IlhanOmar is not a victim. The 2,980 Americans who were slaughtered by Muslim terrorists were the victims. American Muslims lost no more civil liberties than we ALL did after #September11 thanks to the #PatriotAct.”

So now historical revisionism is part of Twitter’s mission statement? As with all things “progressive”, they look at the world in an inverted way. Instead of seeing the terrorism as the “hateful conduct”, they deemed a tweet denouncing terrorism as “hateful conduct.” This clueless censorship happens during a time when yet another terrorist attack, perpetrated by Islamic terrorists via ISIS, slaughtered 250 lives—Christians attacked while worshipping Easter. Oh, wait, I mean Jesus. 




This targeted censorship is just the beginning. My colleague, E.W. Jackson, the outspoken VA Senate Candidate, had his Twitter account deactivated on the same day as mine. Hollywood actor James Woods, who has 2.1 million followers, had his account deactivated on April 20th. It looks like our accounts are still active, but we’re all locked out of them, so we can’t tweet or interact at all.

It’s no secret. Twitter applies its “rules of conduct” unequally. How many liberals decry having their Twitter accounts suspended? None. Well, unless they defy the pseudoscience of LGBT activism. A hardcore “feminist” named Meghan Murphy dared to buck Twitter’s protections for #LGBTQXYZ. She tweeted a basic scientific fact: “Women aren’t men.” Her account has been permanently suspended. 

Then there’s Representative Brian Sims, a Democrat lawmaker and gay activist from my home state of Pennsylvania who spews nothing but hate for Christians…and white people (annnnnnd, he’s white). He recently threatened to dox teenage girls and an elderly woman who were peacefully protesting outside of a Planned Parenthood in Philly. He proudly posted his bullying selfie videos on Twitter. His account remains active, of course. He gets an #LGBT pass.

Speaking of racism, there’s Farrakhan. His virulent racism and anti-Semitism is spread in repulsive tweets. Twitter, apparently, isn’t repulsed. Farrakhan’s tweet, “I’m not anti-Semite. I’m anti-termite.” and many other actual hate-filled words remain untouched on his unsuspended account.




Twitter’s supposed appeal process is a sham, too. We’ve submitted five appeals. Although their auto-responder claims it may take up to a few days to respond, they’ve never responded. Big Tech is out of common folks’ reach. They’re too important to allow contact with an actual human. Free speech and democracy? Not on their watch. 

They’re too insecure in their worldview to be challenged with facts by those outside the Silicon Valley bubble of omniscience. 

Welcome to this not-so-brave new world, where Big Tech largely controls the flow of information, use of pronouns, and how expansively “hate” is defined. Facebook just recently announced that Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos, Laura Loomer and Louis Farrakhan have been removed, among others, from their platforms. Of course, the Washington Post labeled them all “right-wing leaders.” CNN called them all “far-right extremists.” Louis Farrakhan is the extremist, and he’s a radical leftist who hates the GOP and Trump in particular. "The wicked Jews want to use me to break up the women’s movement…Tamika, Linda Sarsour, Carmen Perez [founders of ultra-liberal March For Women], our sister with the #MeToo movement, Black Lives Matter — the women shook the world the day after President Trump was elected," Farrakhan told his audience during his vile Savior’s Day speech where he claimed to be Jesus.   

I don’t know who the Left thinks they’re fooling—each other, I guess. In a CNN interview Twitter CEO, Jack Dorsey, made this laughable declaration: “The real question behind the question is, ‘Are we doing something according to political ideology or viewpoints?’ And we are not. Period,” Dorsey said. “We do not look at content with regards to political viewpoint or ideology. We look at behavior.”




This is dangerous. Where are all the alleged “civil rights” groups on this blatant discrimination? They’re silent on this rampant censorship, because it’s their leftist ideology that’s being protected. These same “progressives” demanded that a baker from Colorado had to be “Open to All” and serve everyone and every event. Yet the world’s largest public platforms flaunt their separate and unequal treatment and denial of services to online users every single day. It’s Jim Crow 2.0. 

Out of principle, I’m not deleting the tweet (we’ve been shadow-banned for years anyway). I have no hate for Muslims. I have no hate for Rep. Ilhan Omar. I hate a lie. It’s why my wife and I created the Radiance Foundation—to illuminate the truth about the human condition and declare that every human life has purpose. Facebook, Google, Twitter and Apple—they’re totalitarian tech. This is all just a pre-game show. They’re merely ramping up for the 2020 elections, purging what they’re bogusly calling “misinformation” and “extremism” to clear the Democrats’ path of ideological obstacles. They’ll continue to widen their “hate speech” nets to the point where the only thing that slips through are their own intolerant words in a sea of fake diversity. 

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
Find text within the comments Find 
 
XXJefferson#51
1  seeder  XXJefferson#51    2 months ago

“Twitter’s supposed appeal process is a sham, too. We’ve submitted five appeals. Although their auto-responder claims it may take up to a few days to respond, they’ve never responded. Big Tech is out of common folks’ reach. They’re too important to allow contact with an actual human. Free speech and democracy? Not on their watch. 

They’re too insecure in their worldview to be challenged with facts by those outside the Silicon Valley bubble of omniscience. 

Welcome to this not-so-brave new world, where Big Tech largely controls the flow of information, use of pronouns, and how expansively “hate” is defined. Facebook just recently announced that Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos, Laura Loomer and Louis Farrakhan have been removed, among others, from their platforms. Of course, the Washington Post labeled them all “right-wing leaders.” CNN called them all “far-right extremists.” Louis Farrakhan is the extremist, and he’s a radical leftist who hates the GOP and Trump in particular. "The wicked Jews want to use me to break up the women’s movement…Tamika, Linda Sarsour, Carmen Perez [founders of ultra-liberal March For Women], our sister with the #MeToo movement, Black Lives Matter — the women shook the world the day after President Trump was elected," Farrakhan told his audience during his vile Savior’s Day speech where he claimed to be Jesus.   

I don’t know who the Left thinks they’re fooling—each other, I guess. In a CNN interview Twitter CEO, Jack Dorsey, made this laughable declaration: “The real question behind the question is, ‘Are we doing something according to political ideology or viewpoints?’ And we are not. Period,” Dorsey said. “We do not look at content with regards to political viewpoint or ideology. We look at behavior.”

This is dangerous. Where are all the alleged “civil rights” groups on this blatant discrimination? They’re silent on this rampant censorship, because it’s their leftist ideology that’s being protected. These same “progressives” demanded that a baker from Colorado had to be “Open to All” and serve everyone and every event. Yet the world’s largest public platforms flaunt their separate and unequal treatment and denial of services to online users every single day. It’s Jim Crow 2.0.”

 
 
 
XXJefferson#51
2  seeder  XXJefferson#51    2 months ago

Big Techs bigoted bias against all things and persons Christian and or conservative is blatantly obvious to all but the willfully blind.

 
 
 
luther28
3  luther28    2 months ago

Oh pashaw!

Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos, Laura Loomer and Louis Farrakhan have been removed, among others, from their platforms. Of course, the Washington Post labeled them all “right-

The folks you have listed here are neither Christians nor Conservatives other than in their own minds perhaps. They are fomenters of hate period.

I do agree they should be allowed their voice (I would question any that care to listen), but I take exception when one describes them as Christians (unlike any I have known) and in truth as I have previously stated they would not know a Conservative if bitten on their arses by one. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson#51
3.1  seeder  XXJefferson#51  replied to  luther28 @3    2 months ago

The article didn’t mention any of them as Christians and we know Farrakhan’s not a conservative.  No one should be deplatformed for stating a religious or political opinion. It’s time for the federal government to step in and require all internet news and social media public sites to allow all sources and opinions on their forum as a precondition of being in business.  Political and religious opinion needs to be a protected class for these purposes.  After all if some think florists, stenographers, photographers, planners, and bakers have to be held to some standard like that, then all internet service providers of any kind should be required also to do likewise as a cost of doing business.  

 
 
 
pat wilson
3.1.1  pat wilson  replied to  XXJefferson#51 @3.1    2 months ago
It’s time for the federal government to step in

Seriously ? You want government to control private entities ? Sounds like socialism.

Political and religious opinion needs to be a protected class

It already is.

 
 
 
Phoenyx13
3.1.2  Phoenyx13  replied to  pat wilson @3.1.1    2 months ago
Seriously ? You want government to control private entities ? Sounds like socialism.

well you know there are many conservative minded people who claim to want a "limited" government - until they want to use the government to control private entities they disagree with

 
 
 
XXJefferson#51
3.1.3  seeder  XXJefferson#51  replied to  pat wilson @3.1.1    2 months ago

If government can force a bakery to design and create a certain kind of cake then it should be able to coerce internet business owners to provide their product to all political, religious, and science viewpoints.  It’s that simple.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson#51
3.1.4  seeder  XXJefferson#51  replied to  Phoenyx13 @3.1.2    2 months ago

Progressives want to coerce via government any number of businesses to provide items for events that violate their religious beliefs so turnabout is fair play I think.  Let’s coerce internet service providers into providing platforms for people that are diametrically opposed to their own viewpoints.  After all, it’s just a cost of doing business and if they don’t like it they should have gotten into a different career, right?  Even if the rules change after they made the commitment and investment!  

 
 
 
pat wilson
3.1.5  pat wilson  replied to  XXJefferson#51 @3.1.3    2 months ago
If government can force a bakery to design and create a certain kind of cake

The government cannot compel a merchant to design and create specific, custom product. The merchants are by law compelled to serve the public without discriminating on the basis of religion, race, politics, or gender.

 
 
 
luther28
3.1.6  luther28  replied to  XXJefferson#51 @3.1    2 months ago
The article didn’t mention any of them as Christians

Perhaps not, but you did.

Big Techs bigoted bias against all things and persons Christian and or conservative is blatantly obvious to all but the willfully blind.

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.1.7  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson#51 @3.1.3    2 months ago

How is government forcing a bakery to design and create a certain kind of cake?  

jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

Internet business providers are in no obligation to support hate speech like the whackjobs Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos, Laura Loomer and Louis Farrakhan were posting.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson#51
3.1.8  seeder  XXJefferson#51  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.7    2 months ago

Farrakhan is a hater.  The others simply having different opinions than yours doesn’t make them haters.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson#51
3.1.9  seeder  XXJefferson#51  replied to  luther28 @3.1.6    2 months ago

There is clear and obvious bigotry and bias against Christianity and against conservatives all over on the internet among internet news and social media providers.  

 
 
 
luther28
3.1.10  luther28  replied to  XXJefferson#51 @3.1.9    2 months ago

No not at all, just against those to be pretending as such or those pushing false narratives.

 
 
 
katrix
3.1.11  katrix  replied to  XXJefferson#51 @3.1.8    2 months ago

Figures - you accept that Farrakhan is a hater because he's Muslim.  If he were a Christian you'd be defending him, too.

Alex Jones' comments after the Parkland shootings were disgusting and hateful.  As was his support of the pizzagate conspiracy theory, which almost resulted in murder.   I am stunned at your defense of these assholes. 

 
 
 
Phoenyx13
3.1.12  Phoenyx13  replied to  XXJefferson#51 @3.1.4    2 months ago
Progressives want to coerce via government any number of businesses to provide items for events that violate their religious beliefs so turnabout is fair play I think.

so they want secular public business owners to do their job and serve the public - and you are upset over this ?

Let’s coerce internet service providers into providing platforms for people that are diametrically opposed to their own viewpoints.

they currently do - after all you are very conservative minded and are still able to post on these platforms aren't you ? i bet you have/had a Facebook too, haven't you ? it seems they are serving everyone until those people break the rules that the private corporations set up for their TOS. Is there a TOS for these Bakers that people have to sign before they can order a product ?

After all, it’s just a cost of doing business and if they don’t like it they should have gotten into a different career, right?  Even if the rules change after they made the commitment and investment!

the rules were never changed - secular public business owners have ALWAYS had to serve the public, why do you think we have anti-discrimination laws ? are you even located in the USA ?

 
 
 
katrix
4  katrix    2 months ago

What a baby the author of this article is.  These purveyors of fake news, hatred, and conspiracy theories should crawl back under the rock they came from instead of crying because they violated the rules and were treated accordingly.  Note that there is not a word of sympathy in this article for the people who were terrified by that whackjob who almost shot up the pizza joint due to assholes like this?

If there actually were a hell, these folks would burn in it.

How many liberals decry having their Twitter accounts suspended? None

Maybe they're not hate-filled assholes who violate the terms of use, so their accounts aren't getting suspended  - or maybe they're not whiny little bitches who cry if they break the rules and their accounts get suspended.

 
 
 
XXJefferson#51
4.1  seeder  XXJefferson#51  replied to  katrix @4    2 months ago

The article author is right on and makes many valid points on the issue of bigoted bias, content control, and censorship across the spectrum of internet social media and news providers.  

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online



Ed-NavDoc
Freefaller
cjcold
GregTx


49 visitors