Rush Limbaugh blames Hillary Clinton for failed ‘coup attempt’ against Trump

  
Via:  heartland-american  •  6 months ago  •  207 comments

Rush Limbaugh blames Hillary Clinton for failed ‘coup attempt’ against Trump
But Limbaugh stressed that Clinton, more than any other figure, was the focal point behind the “coup.” Sure, Obama’s intelligence officials played key roles, but Clinton’s traces are everywhere to be found in the operation. “This was a Hillary Clinton inspired, motivated, bought-and-paid-for operation, everywhere you look in this thing,” Limbaugh said. “[Andrew] McCabe’s wife got money from the Clintons and her campaign in Virginia. [Christopher] Steele paid for by the Clintons. [Andrew]...

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


The failed “coup attempt” to take down President Donald Trump was “95%” Hillary Clinton’s work, Rush Limbaugh said.

Citing a Federalist  article by H.A. Goodman, Limbaugh broke down how Clinton was the No. 1 figure behind the so-called “Deep State” conspiracy to sabotage the Trump campaign and, failing that, to thwart his presidency. While the likes of James Comey and John Brennan played important supporting roles, Clinton was the “architect.”

“I actually think that the architect of all of this is Hillary Clinton, that Hillary Clinton is responsible for this coup — and then people like Comey and others in the [Barack] Obama administration,” Limbaugh said. “It’s hard to separate Obama and Hillary. But this was a Hillary bought-and-paid-for, led-by operation. And it incorporated the Obama DOJ.”

Placing the blame


With the end of the Mueller probe and the beginning of Attorney General William Barr’s review of the origins of the Russia hoax, familiar players have been in the spotlight, from former FBI Director James Comey to former CIA chief John Brennan. But while the FBI, DOJ, and CIA played important roles in the “coup,” they did not supply the “intelligence” that formed the basis of the probe, Limbaugh said.

The radio host said that “every news item, every little bit of information that fed this narrative the past two years or three now — that Trump colluded with Russia — came not from American intelligence, not from British intelligence. It didn’t come from FBI intelligence,” he said. “It came from the Clinton campaign.”

Anti-Trump “coup”


Limbaugh traced how the whole operation — from the FBI’s exoneration of Clinton, to Democrats rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders, and then Clinton funding the dossier that formed the basis of the Russia hoax — was done at Clinton’s behest. Limbaugh noted that Clinton-linked officials in the Obama administration first had to exonerate her of wrongdoing in her misuse of a private email server, which Comey did in July of 2016.

From there, the conspirators turned to denying Trump the presidency. Again, helping Clinton was the motivating factor, and Clinton played a key role in getting the coup off the ground by funding the dirty Russia dossier.

“After that, the project became, ‘Make sure Trump doesn’t win, make sure Hillary does.’ And when that didn’t happen, it was focus efforts on somehow getting rid of Trump,” Limbaugh said. He went on to acknowledge arguments that “you can’t take [Obama] out of this because all of this happened while he was president. And all these institutions — FBI, CIA, and all that — were run by people he’d appointed.”

But Limbaugh stressed that Clinton, more than any other figure, was the focal point behind the “coup.” Sure, Obama’s intelligence officials played key roles, but Clinton’s traces are everywhere to be found in the operation.

“This was a Hillary Clinton inspired, motivated, bought-and-paid-for operation, everywhere you look in this thing,” Limbaugh said . “[Andrew] McCabe’s wife got money from the Clintons and her campaign in Virginia. [Christopher] Steele paid for by the Clintons. [Andrew] Weissmann — Mueller’s guy — was on stage with Hillary during her concession speech and was a big donor. Alexander Downer, the Australian ambassador that supposedly nails [George] Papadopoulos? These people are all part of the Clinton Foundation or the Clinton campaign.”

Minding her business? Not so fast


Clinton was not “minding her own business,” while the Deep State went to work, Limbaugh said; far from it — that’s just not Clinton’s way.

“That’s not who Hillary Clinton is,” Limbaugh insisted. “We know who she is. We know who she’s always been, and this is exactly the kind of operation Hillary Clinton always mounted when her husband was in the White House. She was always a humongous left-wing activist. In fact, when Bill Clinton was in the White House they played the roles.”

Rather than stand idly by, Clinton had the Democratic primary rigged against Sanders, much like she expected the general election to be rigged in her favor with the help of the FBI, DOJ, CIA and other agencies, Limbaugh said. All the officials involved in the “coup” were “linked and tied back to Hillary Clinton, including Mueller’s lead negotiator, lead investigator.”

But the biggest connection of all was Clinton’s involvement in funding the Christopher Steele dossier. With the dossier, the Clinton campaign leveraged the power of the American intelligence apparatus to spy on a political rival — an unprecedented abuse of power. Limbaugh himself cited a piece from John Solomon of The Hill that describes the Steele-Clinton collusion as “arguably the most devious political dirty trick in American history and one of the most overt intrusions of a foreigner into a U.S. election.”

“Screw Russia. How about Steele?” Limbaugh pressed. “You want to talk about foreign intervention in an election, Solomon’s right. Christopher Steele, a British spy who went out and was fed phony items of intelligence by Russian spies that were friends of his, and that’s what made up the Steele dossier.”

It all started with the dossier


The real collusion was between Clinton and Steele, not Trump and Russia, Limbaugh said. Clinton’s funding of the Steele dossier was a campaign contribution that she kept hidden using multiple layers — hiring law firm Perkins Coie, which in turn hired opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which in turn hired Steele.

“Trump didn’t do any of the collusion. Hillary did, with Steele. The foreign collusion was Hillary and Steele using Russians,” Limbaugh said. “A lot of people think this thing all started because somebody really thought Trump was colluding. And that’s not what happened.”

Although the FBI, DOJ, and CIA played important roles in the “coup,” their intelligence had nothing to do with the genesis of the investigation, according to Limbaugh. It all started for one reason only: Hillary Clinton and the salacious dossier she paid for.

“The CIA didn’t find anything. The FBI didn’t find anything. The only thing anybody ever had was what Hillary Clinton gave them,” Limbaugh said. “And every one of these people, apparently an uber-loyalist to Hillary Clinton, then took that ball, the dossier, and ran as far as it would take them.”


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
Find text within the comments Find 
 
Heartland American
1  seeder  Heartland American    6 months ago

“But the biggest connection of all was Clinton’s involvement in funding the Christopher Steele dossier. With the dossier, the Clinton campaign leveraged the power of the American intelligence apparatus to spy on a political rival — an unprecedented abuse of power. Limbaugh himself cited a piece from John Solomon of The Hill that describes the Steele-Clinton collusion as “arguably the most devious political dirty trick in American history and one of the most overt intrusions of a foreigner into a U.S. election.”

“Screw Russia. How about Steele?” Limbaugh pressed. “You want to talk about foreign intervention in an election, Solomon’s right. Christopher Steele, a British spy who went out and was fed phony items of intelligence by Russian spies that were friends of his, and that’s what made up the Steele dossier.”

It all started with the dossier

The real collusion was between Clinton and Steele, not Trump and Russia, Limbaugh said. Clinton’s funding of the Steele dossier was a campaign contribution that she kept hidden using multiple layers — hiring law firm Perkins Coie, which in turn hired opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which in turn hired Steele.

“Trump didn’t do any of the collusion. Hillary did, with Steele. The foreign collusion was Hillary and Steele using Russians,” Limbaugh said. “A lot of people think this thing all started because somebody really thought Trump was colluding. And that’s not what happened.”

Although the FBI, DOJ, and CIA played important roles in the “coup,” their intelligence had nothing to do with the genesis of the investigation, according to Limbaugh. It all started for one reason only: Hillary Clinton and the salacious dossier she paid for.”

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Heartland American @1    6 months ago

Be prepared for a whole lot of "What about Trump?" since no one in their right mind can actually defend it.

 
 
 
pat wilson
1.2  pat wilson  replied to  Heartland American @1    6 months ago

You go on vacation for two weeks and this is what you bring us back ???

 
 
 
Heartland American
1.2.1  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  pat wilson @1.2    6 months ago

I may not have been here but I seeded and commented more than I do here on a competing site during my time away here.  I also had a positive home change to keep me busy.  I’m glad that you all missed me.  

 
 
 
JBB
2  JBB    6 months ago

Except for the fact that there were more than 140 highly inappropriate and possibly illegal meetings and clandestine interactions which were documented in the Mueller Report between high ranking officials of the Trump campaign and known agents of Russian State Intelligence Services which the Trump campaign has since felt they had to lie about this might be plausible. Yeah, except for that. Hmmmm...

 
 
 
Greg Jones
2.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JBB @2    6 months ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
JBB
2.1.1  JBB  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1    6 months ago

So, you've got nothing? Who was this imaginary coup supposedly against?

 
 
 
MrFrost
2.1.2  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1    6 months ago
Nothing in your comment is the truth, and Trump is not the topic.

Seems pretty spot on to me, and, Trump is in the article more than once, so he is fair game, SORRY! 

 
 
 
Heartland American
2.1.3  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  JBB @2.1.1    6 months ago

Anyone accusing Trump or anyone associated with his campaign of colluding with the Russians has less than nothing.  No evidence of any American knowingly colluding with Russia or Russian intelligence assets.  Of course that last part could change now that Hillary and Obama and their henchmen are being investigated. 

 
 
 
JBB
2.1.4  JBB  replied to  Heartland American @2.1.3    6 months ago

Do you really believe all of those ranking Trump campaign associates who had all those 140 plus highly inappropriate meetings with known Russian State Intelligence Services agents were really truly unaware that conspiring with a foreign enemy to defraud the American electorate is highly illegal? 

 
 
 
MrFrost
2.1.5  MrFrost  replied to  Heartland American @2.1.3    6 months ago
Anyone accusing Trump or anyone associated with his campaign of colluding with the Russians has less than nothing

Looks like someone didn't read the Mueller report, which said that while trump didn't seek out help from the Russians, he did accept their help when it was offered. 

Be careful, you were singing his praises when he said there was no collusion, right? Or are you going to walk that back? 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
2.1.6  Thrawn 31  replied to  JBB @2.1.1    6 months ago

[Discuss the seed]

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
2.1.7  Thrawn 31  replied to  Heartland American @2.1.3    6 months ago

Mueller agreed. Hsi conclusion was that Trump, and basically everyone in his campaign tried to, but was just too fucking stupid to do it successfully. 

 No evidence of any American knowingly colluding with Russia or Russian intelligence assets.

Except for everyone who has been indicted and sent to prison.

 Of course that last part could change now that Hillary and Obama and their henchmen are being investigated. 

[Removed]

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
2.1.8  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Thrawn 31 @2.1.7    6 months ago
Except for everyone who has been indicted and sent to prison.

please name the americans who got indicted and then went to prison for colluding with russians to influence our elections in 2016 as a result of the mueller investigation.

thanks :)

it will be fun to watch how many people go to jail for colluding with russians to frame trump.

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.1.9  Texan1211  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @2.1.8    6 months ago

I notice that not even one person can be named that colluded with the Russians.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
2.1.10  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.9    6 months ago
notice that not even one person can be named that colluded with the Russians.

if all ya need is just one name?  hillary

if all ya need is just one govt entity?  fbi

https://www.bing.com/search?q=steele+worked+for+fbi&

 
 
 
Dulay
2.1.11  Dulay  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @2.1.8    6 months ago

[Removed]

 
 
 
Don Overton
2.1.13  Don Overton  replied to  Thrawn 31 @2.1.6    6 months ago

If you feel you were given a bias ticket use a private letter to Pierre about it.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.1.14  Dulay  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @2.1.8    6 months ago
please name the americans who got indicted and then went to prison for colluding with russians to influence our elections in 2016 as a result of the mueller investigation.

Why are you asking for proof of something that wasn't even claimed 8? 

 
 
 
Heartland American
2.1.15  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  MrFrost @2.1.5    6 months ago

I stand by every word of what was arbitrarily deleted in 2.1.3 that you quoted above and double down on the intent of what I said.  Those who accuse Trump or anyone associated with his campaign have absolutely nothing to stand on.  Nothing at all.  There was no collusion.  Period.  End of subject.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.1.16  Texan1211  replied to  Heartland American @2.1.15    6 months ago

Damn! 

They STILL dragging that old dead horse of collusion around?

Even after the Mueller Report?

LMFAO!

 
 
 
Dulay
2.1.17  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.16    6 months ago
Even after the Mueller Report?

Which states:

A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.
In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted
a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of "collusion."

But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law.

As an initial matter , this Office evaluated potentially criminal conduct that involved the collective action of multiple individuals not under the rubric of "collusion," but through the lens of conspiracy law.

("An agreement between two or more persons to defraud a person of his rights by the forms of law, or to obtain an object forbidden by law.").
For that reason, this Office ' s focus in resolving the question of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law, not the commonly discussed term "collusion."

Most of the rest of the time that collusion is cited in the report, it's Trump saying 'no collusion'. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.1.18  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @2.1.17    6 months ago

Democrats should stop dragging the dead horse around.

It is making them look so foolish.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.1.19  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.18    6 months ago
It is making them look so foolish.

What's looks foolish is citing a source and then deny what it says. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.1.20  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @2.1.19    6 months ago
What's looks foolish is citing a source and then deny what it says.

Looks like you have some free time on your hands.

Google "Mueller says no collusion".

https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-trump-russia-next-explainer-int-idUSKCN1R60J1

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/mueller-report-says-no-collusion-reveals-how.

https://www.factcheck.org/2018/02/trump-no-collusion

 
 
 
Dulay
2.1.21  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.20    6 months ago
Looks like you have some free time on your hands.

Are you on the clock? 

Google "Mueller says no collusion".

You cited the Mueller report Tex. I QUOTED the Mueller report, which IS what Mueller says on collusion. 

Now you what to deflect to other sources. Why? 

 
 
 
epistte
2.1.22  epistte  replied to  Dulay @2.1.17    6 months ago
Most of the rest of the time that collusion is cited in the report, it's Trump saying 'no collusion'. 

This looks like collusion to me, 

I. Summary of Major Findings

The redacted Mueller Report documents a series of activities that show strong evidence of collusion. Or, more precisely, it provides significant evidence that Trump Campaign associates coordinated with, cooperated with, encouraged, or gave support to the Russia/WikiLeaks election interference activities. The Report documents the following actions (each of which is analyzed in detail in Part II):

1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.

2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.

3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.

4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.

5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.

6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.

7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.

8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.

9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.

10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.

11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.

12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.

13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.

14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.

During the course of 2016, Trump Campaign associates failed to report any of the Russian/WikiLeaks overtures to federal law enforcement, publicly denied any contacts with Russians/WikiLeaks, and actively encouraged the public to doubt that Russia was behind the hacking and distribution of stolen emails.

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.1.23  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @2.1.21    6 months ago

Then you simply didn't look at the sources that quoted Mueller.

Do your homework!

 
 
 
Dulay
2.1.24  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.23    6 months ago
Then you simply didn't look at the sources that quoted Mueller.

Like this gem from your first link Tex?

MUELLER SPEAKS?
Mueller has not spoken publicly over the course of the 22-month investigation, but that might change now that his work is done.

Your second link has 'Mueller report says' in it's title. Link is fucked up. 

Your third is a fackcheck on what Trump said. 

Do your homework!

That's fucking hilarious Tex. You should take that on the road. 

Don't like what your own cited source says do ya Tex? That's okay neither does Trump or his lawyers. 

 
 
 
 
Texan1211
2.1.26  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @2.1.24    6 months ago

I can lead you to it, but I can't understand it for you.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.1.27  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.26    6 months ago
I can lead you to it,

Yes I know Tex. You've done your best to deflect from the QUOTES that I posted from the Mueller report. This one is worth repeating. 

A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.

but I can't understand it for you.

You'd have to understand it yourself first. You made it painfully obvious that you don't. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.1.28  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @2.1.27    6 months ago

You should learn to quit digging when you are behind.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.1.29  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.28    6 months ago

You should learn not to post supercilious clap trap. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.1.30  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @2.1.29    6 months ago

impasse.

 
 
 
epistte
3  epistte    6 months ago

[Removed]

 
 
 
Ender
3.1  Ender  replied to  epistte @3    6 months ago

Nothing surprises me any more. That anyone would believe lush rush is laughable.

 
 
 
MrFrost
3.2  MrFrost  replied to  epistte @3    6 months ago
How exactly did Hillary Clinton, who has no political power, have the time or the political wherewithal to do this?

I dunno, apparently, according to the right wing, she flew half way around the world and ran through the streets with an AK-47 and murdered 4 people, then flew back home and went to sleep...all in the course of two hours. /s

Don't worry about the eye roll, I got ya covered. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.1  Texan1211  replied to  MrFrost @3.2    6 months ago
I dunno, apparently, according to the right wing, she flew half way around the world and ran through the streets with an AK-47 and murdered 4 people, then flew back home and went to sleep...all in the course of two hours. /s
Don't worry about the eye roll, I got ya covered.

Now, was this before or after she was running around dodging sniper fire?

 
 
 
Ender
3.2.2  Ender  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.1    6 months ago

She is multi talented. At the same time she scattered, smothered, and covered her server.

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.3  Texan1211  replied to  Ender @3.2.2    6 months ago
At the same time she scattered, smothered, and covered her server.

Now, was that before or after she wiped the server with "like, a cloth"?

 
 
 
Ender
3.2.4  Ender  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.3    6 months ago

It was around the same time she was coordinating Bill's off shore adventures with underage girls.

And still managing the local DC pedo ring.

At least she got free pizza...I think.

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.5  Texan1211  replied to  Ender @3.2.4    6 months ago

Well, what with all that running around she did, I can see how she didn't have time or energy to visit some of the Blue Wall states.

 
 
 
Ender
3.2.6  Ender  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.5    6 months ago

Now you know why she was stumbling around and fainting.

It can be very stressful.

Plus add on trying to find a dress.

 
 
 
MrFrost
3.2.7  MrFrost  replied to  Ender @3.2.4    6 months ago
[Removed]
 
 
 
Ender
3.2.8  Ender  replied to  MrFrost @3.2.7    6 months ago

I remember some nutjob burst into the joint waving a gun. Demanded they open the basement door and it was a janitor closet.

That some people actually believe these ridiculous conspiracy theories is kind of scary.

 
 
 
epistte
3.2.9  epistte  replied to  Ender @3.2.8    6 months ago
I remember some nutjob burst into the joint waving a gun. Demanded they open the basement door and it was a janitor closet. That some people actually believe these ridiculous conspiracy theories is kind of scary.

This pizza joint in question was reviewed on the Food Network. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
3.2.10  MrFrost  replied to  Ender @3.2.8    6 months ago
I remember some nutjob burst into the joint waving a gun. Demanded they open the basement door and it was a janitor closet.

You are correct, I recall that as well. 

 
 
 
Heartland American
3.2.11  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.3    6 months ago

And a bit of bleach?  

 
 
 
Heartland American
3.2.12  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.5    6 months ago

That’s because she thought that 4,000,000 extra votes in California were worth more than 100,000 extra votes in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin were worth.  

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
3.2.13  Thrawn 31  replied to  Heartland American @3.2.12    6 months ago

They absolutely should be, 4 million is bigger than 1 hundred thousand. Either way, we will see if those 1 hundred thousand stick with dumb ass bow that he has started hiking their taxes for no reason. 

 
 
 
Heartland American
3.2.14  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Ender @3.2.6    6 months ago

You mean she actually wore one recently?

 
 
 
Heartland American
3.2.15  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Thrawn 31 @3.2.13    6 months ago

We had 48 state races and one district where the person winning the plurality of votes in that state or district won all the electoral votes for the given state or district. Whether won by one vote or 4,000,000 doesn’t matter.  You win the state or not and the vote is not cumulative.  Hillary won all the ev’s for Ca.  Trump won all the ev’s for Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin.  Trump competed according to the rules in place.   

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.16  Texan1211  replied to  Heartland American @3.2.15    6 months ago

Waste of time trying to explain elections.

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.17  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.5    6 months ago

Which 'blue wall states' didn't Clinton visit? 

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.18  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @3.2.17    6 months ago

For one, she didn't visit Wisconsin after the DNC convention.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/analysis-where-have-donald-trump-and-hillary-clinton...

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.19  Dulay  replied to  Heartland American @3.2.12    6 months ago

Actually Xx, Clinton got over 400,000 less votes in CA than Obama. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.20  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @3.2.19    6 months ago

What does that have to do with Hillary losing to Trump?

And without California, she wouldn't have won the "popular" vote Dems are so fond of citing.

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.21  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.18    6 months ago

24

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.22  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @3.2.21    6 months ago

Yes, that is EXACTLY what you were attempting to do with the post about Clinton getting less votes in California than Obama did.

Very good!

Self awareness is a GOOD thing!

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.23  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.20    6 months ago
What does that have to do with Hillary losing to Trump?

It would behoove you to follow the thread Tex. 

Here, I'll help. My comment was in reply to this one: 

That’s because she thought that 4,000,000 extra votes in California

I cited the FACT that Clinton did not get 4,000,000 EXTRA votes in California. 

And without California, she wouldn't have won the "popular" vote Dems are so fond of citing.

Well gee Tex, since you want to take 55 electoral votes from Clinton, how about I take the 46 EV's of MI, WI and PA from Trump? What other states would you like to disenfranchise? I'm still 9 short...

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.24  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.22    6 months ago
Yes, that is EXACTLY what you were attempting to do with the post about Clinton getting less votes in California than Obama did.

False. Follow the thread. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.25  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @3.2.23    6 months ago

I didn't state anything that asinine.

The popular vote, if you left Cali alone out, had Trump winning.

That was my point.

Doesn't matter anyways, Trump won and Abuela lost.

Hope you can see it now.

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.26  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.25    6 months ago
I didn't state anything that asinine.

Did I misquote your Tex? 

The popular vote, if you left Cali alone out, had Trump winning.
That was my point.

Yes, you want to disenfranchise a state. Turnabout being fair play, I get to do some too. 

Doesn't matter anyways, Trump won and Abuela lost.

It must still matter to you since you continue with juvenile name calling and try to 'level the playing field' for Trump by disenfranchising the most populous state in the nation. 

Hope you can see it now.

I wasn't the one who brought up the bullshit about the numbers...I'm just the one citing the facts about them. 

 
 
 
Heartland American
3.2.27  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.16    6 months ago

True...

 
 
 
Heartland American
3.2.28  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Dulay @3.2.17    6 months ago

Wisconsin. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.29  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @3.2.26    6 months ago

Nice try.

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.30  Dulay  replied to  Heartland American @3.2.28    6 months ago

There were Clinton Rallies in Wisconsin. Clinton was scheduled for a rally in Green Bay with Obama but it was canceled because of the Pulse nightclub shooting. 

If winning a state was all about campaigning there, Clinton should have won PA and FL hands down.

Clinton visited states that she lost, so did Trump. 

 
 
 
evilgenius
3.2.31  evilgenius  replied to  Dulay @3.2.30    6 months ago

I live in WI. Many people were upset with Clinton's lack of love shown in WI and has been attributed to vote loss. The good news is that Trump love is disappearing in the Dairy State as WI farmers are losing badly here. Suicide rates for farmers in the area are going up. The Foxconn thing hasn't gone away either. It's a total fuckup for Trump and Walker there too. 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
3.2.32  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.22    6 months ago

Punted and still missed...jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.33  Dulay  replied to  evilgenius @3.2.31    6 months ago

I saw an interview with Sen. Baldwin and she was talking about the disappearing dairy farms. I spent my summers as a kid on my great grandfather's dairy farm in western WI.

I took my mom back there to visit his grave and was surprised about how may farms were 'gentrified'. Some still had horses but hardly any cows in sight. It was sad to see...

 
 
 
Heartland American
3.2.34  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Dulay @3.2.26    6 months ago

California was not disenfranchised.  We had a popular vote for all of our 55 electoral votes to go to the winner of the vote within our state.  That happened.  Hillary won our electoral votes.  Our popular vote is of no effect on the popular vote of any other state.  Trump won the popular vote counts in enough states to win the majority in the electoral college.  I love rubbing it in on my states liberal population that Trump is our President.  Trump did win about 2-1 over Hillary in my region of California/Jefferson

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.35  Texan1211  replied to  Heartland American @3.2.34    6 months ago

He knows that, just doesn't like to admit it.

It is always easier to put words in others' mouths and then debate THAT instead of what they actually say.

It is intellectually lazy and dishonest----and typical.

 
 
 
Heartland American
3.2.36  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.35    6 months ago

And that moving goal post meme was ridiculous considering who was moving them above..,

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.37  Texan1211  replied to  Heartland American @3.2.36    6 months ago

jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.38  Dulay  replied to  Heartland American @3.2.34    6 months ago
California was not disenfranchised.

No one said they were Xx. 

We had a popular vote for all of our 55 electoral votes to go to the winner of the vote within our state. That happened. Hillary won our electoral votes. Our popular vote is of no effect on the popular vote of any other state. Trump won the popular vote counts in enough states to win the majority in the electoral college.

Thank you Capt. Obvious. 

I love rubbing it in on my states liberal population that Trump is our President.

You must be the life of the party Xx. 

Trump did win about 2-1 over Hillary in my region of California/Jefferson

There is no region of California named Jefferson. 

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.39  Dulay  replied to  Heartland American @3.2.36    6 months ago

Where? 

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.40  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @3.2.38    6 months ago
California was not disenfranchised.
No one said they were Xx.
Yes, you want to disenfranchise a state.

Didn't you write that last sentence?

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.41  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.40    6 months ago
Didn't you write that last sentence?

Actually I wrote it all. 

There seems to be a viral case of strawman infection around here. 

Yes, you want to disenfranchise a state.

That doesn't say that California was disenfranchised, DOES it Tex? 

So unless you can site were someone else said so somewhere else, WTF is your issue? 

 
 
 
Freedom Warrior
3.3  Freedom Warrior  replied to  epistte @3    6 months ago
Clinton, who has no political power,

How is possible someone could make a statement like that with a straight face?

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
3.3.1  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Freedom Warrior @3.3    6 months ago

[deleted]

and hillary was just pissed because it was "her turn"

[deleted]

[cheers :)]

 
 
 
Heartland American
3.3.2  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @3.3.1    6 months ago

what an awesome post.  It was great.  Each and every original word of it.  

 
 
 
Don Overton
3.4  Don Overton  replied to  epistte @3    6 months ago

If you feel you were given a bias ticket use a private letter to Pierre about it.

 
 
 
MrFrost
4  MrFrost    6 months ago

Sounds like rush got some bad Oxy in his last shipment. 

 
 
 
JBB
5  JBB    6 months ago

Is Rush back on drugs, again? Did he ever really quit? How could we ever really tell?

 
 
 
MrFrost
5.1  MrFrost  replied to  JBB @5    6 months ago
Is Rush back on drugs, again? Did he ever really quit? How could anyone tell?

Well, if his illegal immigrant house keeper gets arrested for buying drugs, I guess we'll know.

 
 
 
Ender
5.1.1  Ender  replied to  MrFrost @5.1    6 months ago

trump might give her a pardon, push her up on the immigration chain.

Ya know, just because she was doing the will of a supporter.

 
 
 
MrFrost
5.1.2  MrFrost  replied to  Ender @5.1.1    6 months ago

You aren't wrong! It wouldn't shock me in the least..

 
 
 
MrFrost
6  MrFrost    6 months ago
The foreign collusion was Hillary and Steele using Russians,

Um, the Russians wanted trump to win, so she was colluding to do what? Help donny win? 

 
 
 
bccrane
6.1  bccrane  replied to  MrFrost @6    6 months ago

No, they wanted the election to be close for a repeat of Bush/Gore and the political turmoil that would cause.  Remember Trump was hounded by Hillary and the press because he wouldn't commit to accepting the election results when he lost.

 
 
 
Heartland American
6.1.1  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  bccrane @6.1    6 months ago

And then Hillary never did accept the results when it was she who actually was a loser.  

 
 
 
MrFrost
6.1.2  MrFrost  replied to  bccrane @6.1    6 months ago
No, they wanted the election to be close for a repeat of Bush/Gore and the political turmoil that would cause.

No. Putin said himself, several times, that he wanted trump to win. Speculation is that the reason is two fold. 

1) Putin HATES Clinton, (which also makes the "Clinton colluded with Russia" claim even more ridiculous), which put him firmly in trumps corner.  

2) Not a big secret that trump has borrowed hundreds of millions of dollars from Russia to build golf courses all over the world, Putin could use that as leverage to get what he wants from the USA, (mostly sanctions removed that the Obama admin imposed). Our current congress voted unanimously, to impose sanctions on Russia for their interference in the 2016 election...trump refused to impose them.... Why? 

 
 
 
MrFrost
6.1.3  MrFrost  replied to  bccrane @6.1    6 months ago
Remember Trump was hounded by Hillary and the press because he wouldn't commit to accepting the election results when he lost.

That's because he knew then the election was rigged...he said so himself several times, "The election is rigged!!!". 

 
 
 
MrFrost
6.1.4  MrFrost  replied to  Heartland American @6.1.1    6 months ago
And then Hillary never did accept the results when it was she who actually was a loser.

Actually she did, she called and conceded the election the following day. Which makes me wonder why the fake news right wing media is STILL bringing her up? I mean, the right wing was all up in arms saying that they couldn't wait for Hillary to go away never to be heard from again....yet here we are, almost 3 years later and articles are still popping up here and on fox news, (pretty much daily). Weird huh? 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
6.1.5  Thrawn 31  replied to  Heartland American @6.1.1    6 months ago

[deleted.

 
 
 
bccrane
6.1.6  bccrane  replied to  MrFrost @6.1.4    6 months ago

Actually she did, she called and conceded the election the following day. 

Because she didn't want to look like a hypocrite after demanding that of Trump throughout the campaign. But what was that that happened in Michigan, it seems that a recount was started and by someone who had no chance in, well she barely got a percentage point of votes, Jill Stein, did she petition a recount in Michigan in hopes she could win, did she do it thinking it was her duty to help Hillary, or was she directed by Hillary to do it?

 
 
 
Ronin2
6.1.7  Ronin2  replied to  MrFrost @6.1.4    6 months ago
Actually she did, she called and conceded the election the following day.

After her massive, destructive, tirade in which she blamed everyone but herself. 

Which makes me wonder why the fake news right wing media is STILL bringing her up?

Because the left conveniently continues to forget about her. She lost, end of story, she couldn't do anything wrong. Bill speaking to the Russians for hundreds of thousands of dollars a shot. No problem. Clinton Foundation suddenly losing all funding after she lost. No problem. 

Weird huh? 

Only to those on the left that still believe she isn't a criminal. But she is Establishment, and has that all important D behind her name.

 
 
 
MrFrost
6.1.8  MrFrost  replied to  bccrane @6.1.6    6 months ago

Well let the seeder know, he seems to think she never conceded the election. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
6.1.9  MrFrost  replied to  Ronin2 @6.1.7    6 months ago
After her massive, destructive, tirade in which she blamed everyone but herself. 

Proof? Link? Were you there? 

/crickets/

Bill speaking to the Russians for hundreds of thousands of dollars a shot.

1) Is that illegal? LOTS of people give speeches for money. 

2) Ain't capitalism great?!!!

Only to those on the left that still believe she isn't a criminal.

Indictments? Charges? Arrests? Prison sentences? 

Weird, the right insists on those things when talking about trump, but when it comes to Clinton, they aren't needed to call her a criminal... Hypocrite much? 

 
 
 
Dulay
6.1.10  Dulay  replied to  bccrane @6.1.6    6 months ago
Jill Stein, did she petition a recount in Michigan in hopes she could win, did she do it thinking it was her duty to help Hillary, or was she directed by Hillary to do it?

Jill Stein, the one that went to dinner with Flynn and Putin. Ya, it sounds like she had a ton of loyalty to Clinton. 

 
 
 
epistte
6.1.11  epistte  replied to  Dulay @6.1.10    6 months ago
Jill Stein, the one that went to dinner with Flynn and Putin. Ya, it sounds like she had a ton of loyalty to Clinton. 

Jill Stein is a loon. I used to support Green Party ideas but somehow their candidates are always wackos.

 
 
 
Tessylo
6.1.12  Tessylo  replied to  epistte @6.1.11    6 months ago
'Jill Stein is a loon. I used to support Green Party ideas but somehow their candidates are always wackos.'

Ain't that the truth?  Who was that guy, was it Gary Johnson?  Another wacko.  

 
 
 
epistte
6.1.13  epistte  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.12    6 months ago
Ain't that the truth?  Who was that guy, was it Gary Johnson?  Another wacko.  

Gary Johnson was the moronic libertarian candidate.

 
 
 
Heartland American
6.1.14  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  MrFrost @6.1.8    6 months ago

No one said she didn’t go through the motions but all her actions since show that she’s never accepted the results...

 
 
 
MrFrost
6.1.15  MrFrost  replied to  Heartland American @6.1.14    6 months ago
No one said she didn’t go through the motions but all her actions since show that she’s never accepted the results...

Is that the truth or is it what you want to believe? My guess is the latter. 

Or do you want to admit trump is just mad and cannot accept the results of the mid-terms. Or that people in the South are mad they lost the civil war? 

Pro-tip: Stop trying to tell everyone what someone else is feeling just so you can feed your own political agenda. 

 
 
 
Ronin2
6.2  Ronin2  replied to  MrFrost @6    6 months ago
Um, the Russians wanted trump to win,

No, the Russians wanted to sow dissent and turn us against each other. Mission accomplished.  Putin is laughing his ass off.  He didn't have to spend millions of dollars to do it. Our fucking government and the Establishment morons in it did it for him.  Trump 

so she was colluding to do what?

Oh, hiring an outside agent (Steele) to produce a bullshit fake dossier that he funneled to the State Department, FBI, CIA, and never Trumpers on both sides of the isle in Congress. The FBI ran with the ball and used the Steele Dossier to help get FISA warrants against Carter Page (who they have know about forever, and has helped out both the FBI and CIA as an informant in the past). Using the illegal FISA warrants they proceeded to investigate everything Trump.  Of course both Comey and Mueller made the bone headed mistake of not questioning, or indicting Carter Page. Some master spy- kind of blows a complete hole in their FISA warrants when they couldn't turn up jack shit on him. Not even something like tax evasion; lying under oath (again have to bother to question him first); or conspiracy.

Help donny win? 

You are almost too funny. Problem with the plan Hillary, Steele, and the Obama administration cooked up was that it was too damn slow. They couldn't get enough dirt to do anything. Again blowing holes in the whole Carter Page master spy argument. It then turned into a remove Trump from office, since Hillary lost. Trump isn't establishment. Hillary, Obama, and the rest of the career unelected government employees on both sides are as well.

 
 
 
MrFrost
6.2.1  MrFrost  replied to  Ronin2 @6.2    6 months ago
Oh, hiring an outside agent (Steele)

He's British...and you did know that country is an ally of ours, right? 

 
 
 
Freedom Warrior
6.2.2  Freedom Warrior  replied to  MrFrost @6.2.1    6 months ago

 Hell, half the people here aren’t even allies let alone some slimey limey. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
6.2.3  MrFrost  replied to  Freedom Warrior @6.2.2    6 months ago
Hell, half the people here aren’t even allies let alone some slimey limey. 

Hey man, whatever you have to tell yourself to get through the day. 

 
 
 
Freedom Warrior
6.2.4  Freedom Warrior  replied to  MrFrost @6.2.3    6 months ago

Oh so you actually think of yourself as an ally of mine.

Won't need to wait for a response on that one.

 
 
 
MrFrost
7  MrFrost    6 months ago
“But the biggest connection of all was Clinton’s involvement in funding the Christopher Steele dossier.

You misspelled "Rubio Campaign". 

 
 
 
Ronin2
7.1  Ronin2  replied to  MrFrost @7    6 months ago

You misspelled "Rubio Campaign". 

Been debunked. Next.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/once-more-for-good-measure-conservatives-didnt-fund-the-steele-dossier

T he Washington Free Beacon did not bankroll the Steele dossier, a highly dubious work of opposition research alleging the Russians have compromising personal and financial information on Donald Trump.

Rather, the conservative newsroom hired the same research firm that later created it, Fusion GPS, in 2016 to investigate Trump and other Republican candidates during the GOP primaries.

After Trump had won the nomination, the Free Beacon dropped the project. It was at that point that Democratic operatives swooped in, bringing along with them former British spy Christopher Steele. It is from Steele’s work that we get all this Russia business

To reiterate, the Free Beacon had nothing to do with Steele or his work on the dossier.

“The Free Beacon had no knowledge of or connection to the Steele dossier, did not pay for the dossier, and never had contact with, knowledge of, or provided payment for any work performed by Christopher Steele,” the group’s top brass said in a statement . “Nor did we have any knowledge of the relationship between Fusion GPS and the Democratic National Committee, Perkins Coie, and the Clinton campaign.”

For some reason, though, media keep claiming incorrectly that the Free Beacon ("Republicans") initially funded the Russia file.

https://dailycaller.com/2018/12/18/comey-steele-dossier-republicans/

Former FBI Director James Comey falsely claimed throughout two recently congressional interviews that Republicans were the initial backers of the infamous Steele dossier, which alleges a vast conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian government to influence the 2016 election.

Comey claimed twice in an interview Monday with the House Judiciary and House Oversight Committees that Republicans initially commissioned the work of Christopher Steele, the former British spy behind the dossier. He made similar claims twice more in an interview with the same committees on Dec. 7.

“I remember being told that Steele’s work had been funded first by Republicans opposed to Trump, then by Democrats opposed to Trump,” Comey said at one point during Monday’s interview, according to a transcript of the session. (RELATED: House Committees Release James Comey Transcript)

“It was Republicans opposed to Trump, and then it was Democrats opposed to Trump,” he said later in the same interview.

Comey, who was fired as FBI chief on May 9, 2017, made the same mistake in his interview earlier this month.

“I thought [Steele] was retained as part of a Republican-financed effort — retained by Republicans adverse to Mr. Trump during the primary season, and then his work was underwritten after that by Democrats opposed to Mr. Trump during 110 the general election season,” Comey said during his Dec. 7 interview.

Later, he said that he believed that it was important for investigators to understand that the dossier was “a politically motivated effort, first by Republicans, then by Democrats.”

It is clear from the transcripts of Comey’s interviews that he was unfamiliar with details of the dossier and how it was handled within the FBI. He was fuzzy on dates and said that he was not familiar with Fusion GPS, the firm the hired Steele, or Perkins Coie, the law firm that hired Fusion on behalf of the Clinton campaign and DNC.

Comey is not the only Trump opponent to falsely claim that Republicans were involved in the dossier. Democrats and many journalists have repeated the inaccurate claim. The source of confusion revolves around the timeline of Fusion GPS’s investigation into Trump.

The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative website owned by Republican donor Paul Singer, paid Fusion GPS during the 2016 primary season to investigate Trump. But executives with the website and with Fusion GPS have said that they discontinued the Trump research effort after it became apparent that the real estate baron would win the GOP nomination.

“I think we started in September or October, and I think it wound down in April [2016], sometime in the spring,” Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson testified to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on Nov. 14, 2017. “As the Republican primaries came to an end, it became obvious that that work was going to end.”

Fusion went looking for a new client soon after to continue its investigation of Trump. The firm found Perkins Coie.

With a new client funding its anti-Trump effort, Fusion GPS hired Steele in June 2016. Perkins Coie paid Fusion around $1 million through November 2016, and Fusion paid Steele around $170,000.

Steele, a former MI6 officer who worked in Russia before retiring, relied on intermediaries to obtain information about Trump and his campaign advisers.

Steele would go on to produce 17 memos dates from June 20, 2016, to Dec. 13, 2016. The FBI relied on his unverified memos to obtain four Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants against former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page .

Republicans have accused the FBI and Comey of misleading the FISA Court by relying so heavily on the dossier, which was unverified when the FBI included information from it in FISA applications.

Republicans have also argued that the FBI should have told FISA judges that the Clinton campaign and DNC were the ultimate funders of the dossier.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/clinton-campaign-dnc-paid-for-research-that-led-to-russia-dossier/2017/10/24/226fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html?utm_term=.2890e6e048fe

The Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee helped fund research that resulted in a now-famous dossier containing allegations about President Trump's connections to Russia and possible coordination between his campaign and the Kremlin, people familiar with the matter said.

Marc E. Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Fusion GPS, a Washington firm, to conduct the research.

After that, Fusion GPS hired dossier author Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer with ties to the FBI and the U.S. intelligence community, according to those people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Elias and his law firm, Perkins Coie, retained the company in April 2016 on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Before that agreement, Fusion GPS's research into Trump was funded by an unknown Republican client during the GOP primary.

The Clinton campaign and the DNC, through the law firm, continued to fund Fusion GPS's research through the end of October 2016, days before Election Day.

Fusion GPS gave Steele's reports and other research documents to Elias, the people familiar with the matter said. It is unclear how or how much of that information was shared with the campaign and the DNC and who in those organizations was aware of the roles of Fusion GPS and Steele. One person close to the matter said the campaign and the DNC were not informed by the law firm of Fusion GPS's role.

Some of the details are included in a Tuesday letter sent by Perkins Coie to a lawyer representing Fusion GPS, telling the research firm that it was released from a ­client-confidentiality obligation. The letter was prompted by a legal fight over a subpoena for Fusion GPS's bank records.

People involved in the matter said that they would not disclose the dollar amounts paid to Fusion GPS but that the campaign and the DNC shared the cost.

https://www.politifact.com/north-carolina/statements/2018/sep/11/mark-meadows/meadows-says-ohr-got-dossier-through-his-wife/

Fusion GPS didn't hire Steele until after the Clinton Campaign, and DNC, started footing the bill.

Guess the left is practicing Goebbels “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
7.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ronin2 @7.1    6 months ago

This is too much for some to learn. Dates and authorship is just a lot to ask some progressives to understand.

 
 
 
Freedom Warrior
8  Freedom Warrior    6 months ago

We all know that HRC is one of the dirtiest freaking politicians to ever exist in the US, from the Clinton cash to the dossier, the murders and deaths surrounding her it goes on and on and then you have all these sick sycophants defending that shit like  she’s some saint, damn that’s sick.

 
 
 
epistte
8.1  epistte  replied to  Freedom Warrior @8    6 months ago
We all know that HRC is one of the dirtiest freaking politicians to ever exist in the US, from the Clinton cash to the dossier, the murders and deaths surrounding her it goes on and on and then you have all these sick sycophants defending that shit like  she’s some saint, damn that’s sick.

There is no supporting evidence for any of this innuendo.  You want to believe it but you cannot claim that it is true. She would be in prison if you could prove that any of this was true.

I don't like her but she isn't an American Rasputin. 

 
 
 
Heartland American
8.1.1  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  epistte @8.1    6 months ago

She made Rasputin seem tame and mundane in comparison to herself. 

 
 
 
epistte
8.1.2  epistte  replied to  Heartland American @8.1.1    6 months ago
She made Rasputin seem tame and mundane in comparison to herself. 

You are giving her far too much credit. Hillary Clinton has done nothing on the national stage except have an unappealing personality.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
8.1.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  epistte @8.1.2    6 months ago

[delete

 
 
 
Heartland American
8.1.4  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  epistte @8.1.2    6 months ago

Well according to Bill Clinton, she’s had sex with more women than he has had it with.  

 
 
 
JBB
8.2  JBB  replied to  Freedom Warrior @8    6 months ago

No, "We", do not all buy all that conspiracy theory crapola you are failing to sell...

 
 
 
lib50
8.2.1  lib50  replied to  JBB @8.2    6 months ago

OMG, I recently was stuck in my car and listening to Rush for shits and giggles, and that guy has lost his marbles, I kid you not. (Maybe they are in his mouth) He slurs and lisps through his batshit crazy conspiracies and the poor dumb putzes lap it up.  I admit to a small feeling of fear wondering how many saps believe that crap that day.  Kind of just got worse.

 
 
 
Heartland American
8.2.2  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  lib50 @8.2.1    6 months ago

Offend a progressive, listen to Rush Limbaugh!

 
 
 
epistte
8.2.3  epistte  replied to  Heartland American @8.2.2    6 months ago
Offend a progressive, listen to Rush Limbaugh!

The combination of ignorant and gullible is what is offensive. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
8.2.4  MrFrost  replied to  Heartland American @8.2.2    6 months ago
Offend a progressive, listen to Rush Limbaugh!

Want to lose 60 IQ points? Listen to Rush Limpballs! 

 
 
 
Heartland American
8.2.5  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  epistte @8.2.3    6 months ago

Rush is Right!

 
 
 
epistte
8.2.6  epistte  replied to  Heartland American @8.2.5    6 months ago
Rush is Right!

Just because you and others may agree with what Rush Limbaugh says doesn't mean that he is actually correct. That idea is a confirmation bias.

 
 
 
Tessylo
8.2.7  Tessylo  replied to  Heartland American @8.2.5    6 months ago

He may be 'right' but he is always incorrect.  

 
 
 
bugsy
8.2.8  bugsy  replied to  Heartland American @8.2.2    6 months ago
Offend a progressive, listen to Rush Limbaugh!

Only partially correct...

Offend a progressive, speak the truth.

That's the whole of it..

 
 
 
r.t..b...
8.2.9  r.t..b...  replied to  bugsy @8.2.8    6 months ago
speak the truth.

But where does trump fit into any narrative where the truth is invoked? Castigate whatever media outlet you choose as they have certainly merited derision. But by any measure, this guy has blurred the lines better than anyone to use the media he purports to dismiss while using same to deliver his message. Brilliant in its' simplicity...frightening in its' implication.

 
 
 
bugsy
8.2.10  bugsy  replied to  r.t..b... @8.2.9    6 months ago
But where does trump fit into any narrative

I do't know where that came from except to simply deflect from reality....

My post said..

"Offend a progressive, speak the truth.

That's the whole of it.."

Nowhere did I  mention Trump.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
8.2.11  1stwarrior  replied to  bugsy @8.2.10    6 months ago

But . . . but . . . but . . . there's a "t" in "the" and a "t" in "truth".  Two "t"s equal Trump, don't it?????

 
 
 
MrFrost
8.3  MrFrost  replied to  Freedom Warrior @8    6 months ago

When was she charged with murder? Hell, when was she charged with ANYTHING? Parking ticket? Expired tabs? Anything at all? 

.

For two years we had to listen to, "Trump is innocent!!!! No charges!!!! No collusion!!!! No obstruction!!!"... And here you come, claiming she murdered people and some other fake news BS? So I will ask you again...

.

WHERE ARE THE FUCKING CHARGES?!

 
 
 
Freedom Warrior
8.3.1  Freedom Warrior  replied to  MrFrost @8.3    6 months ago

I just charged her.  ANd I will continue to charge her with being one of most corrupt politicians to ever stain this country.

 
 
 
Tessylo
8.3.2  Tessylo  replied to  Freedom Warrior @8.3.1    6 months ago
'I just charged her.  ANd I will continue to charge her with being one of most corrupt politicians to ever stain this country.'

And your authority to do so?

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
MrFrost
8.3.3  MrFrost  replied to  Freedom Warrior @8.3.1    6 months ago
being one of most corrupt politicians to ever

Trump has been sued for fraud 3,000+ times.

Hiallry? Never. 

Sorry, who was the corrupt one again? 

 
 
 
Freedom Warrior
8.3.4  Freedom Warrior  replied to  MrFrost @8.3.3    6 months ago

Not one of those disputes  amount to a hill of beans compared to the corruption that HiLIARy et alhave engaged in throughout the political lives. 

 It’s really a shame that you are unable to recognize that fact, I find it extremely disgusting 

 
 
 
MrFrost
8.3.5  MrFrost  replied to  Freedom Warrior @8.3.4    6 months ago

So list those charges? We'll wait. 

No charges, no crimes, that's the way our judicial system works. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
8.3.6  MrFrost  replied to  Freedom Warrior @8.3.1    6 months ago
I just charged her.  ANd I will continue to charge her with being one of most corrupt politicians to ever stain this country.

I am sure she is scared.. LOL

 
 
 
Freedom Warrior
8.3.7  Freedom Warrior  replied to  MrFrost @8.3.6    6 months ago
 
 
 
Thrawn 31
9  Thrawn 31    6 months ago

He's still alive?

 
 
 
Tessylo
9.1  Tessylo  replied to  Thrawn 31 @9    6 months ago

He's still on the air?  Who knew?  

 
 
 
MUVA
9.1.1  MUVA  replied to  Tessylo @9.1    6 months ago

He has the biggest radio show in the country by far only someone that was completely uninformed wouldn't know that.

 
 
 
Texan1211
9.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @9.1    6 months ago
He's still on the air? Who knew?

Millions know. People who keep up with the news knew.

 
 
 
Tessylo
9.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  MUVA @9.1.1    6 months ago
'only someone that was completely uninformed wouldn't know that'

So those who listen to Limpballs are completely informed?

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Texan1211
9.1.4  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @9.1.3    6 months ago
So those who listen to Limpballs are completely informed?

At least informed enough to know what his name is and how to spell it correctly.

 
 
 
Freedom Warrior
9.1.5  Freedom Warrior  replied to  Texan1211 @9.1.4    6 months ago

Interestlngly they appear to hang on every word offered up by their enemy Trump but not the one who has been an even greater opponent during that past several decades.

 
 
 
Tessylo
9.1.6  Tessylo  replied to  MUVA @9.1.1    6 months ago

Informed people don't listen to the turd.  

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
9.1.7  Thrawn 31  replied to  MUVA @9.1.1    6 months ago
People still listen to radio? Do they also communicate via telegraph? 

 
 
 
SteevieGee
9.1.8  SteevieGee  replied to  MUVA @9.1.1    6 months ago

I once worked with a guy who listened to rush at work.  I told him that Jane Fonda was one of the owners of the company and he quit.  I can't help it.  I couldn't listen to it anymore.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
9.1.9  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Thrawn 31 @9.1.7    6 months ago
People still listen to radio? Do they also communicate via telegraph?

rush reaches more people daily than the entire leftwing and rightwing MSM combined  

 
 
 
Heartland American
9.1.10  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Thrawn 31 @9.1.7    6 months ago

You actually have a car that doesn’t have a radio in it?  Is it a Model T?  

 
 
 
Texan1211
9.1.11  Texan1211  replied to  Heartland American @9.1.10    6 months ago

Surprising that he never heard of I Heart Radio.

 
 
 
MrFrost
9.1.12  MrFrost  replied to  MUVA @9.1.1    6 months ago
He has the biggest radio show in the country by far

Mostly because people want to listen to a certifiable nutjob/moron. 

 
 
 
Don Overton
9.1.13  Don Overton  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @9.1.9    6 months ago

Prove your dribble there 8

 
 
 
Dulay
9.1.14  Dulay  replied to  Don Overton @9.1.13    6 months ago

Don't hold your breath. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
10  Tessylo    6 months ago

'People who keep up with the news knew.'

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Texan1211
10.1  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @10    6 months ago

Well, since about 15.5 million listen to him each week, seems like YES, people who follow news actually knew Rush is alive and doing well on the air.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-listened-to_radio_programs

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
10.1.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  Texan1211 @10.1    6 months ago
Well, since about 15.5 million listen to him each week

Nothing like that kind of stat to reduce faith in humanity. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
10.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Thrawn 31 @10.1.1    6 months ago
Nothing like that kind of stat to reduce faith in humanity.

Well, that certainly is one opinion.

 
 
 
Heartland American
10.1.3  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Texan1211 @10.1.2    6 months ago

What’s really sad is that one would base their opinion of humanity on how many disagree with their own personal opinion on issues. 

 
 
 
Dulay
10.1.4  Dulay  replied to  Heartland American @10.1.3    6 months ago

Exactly, because basing your opinion of humanity on how many agree with your personal opinion on issues is so much better.../s

 
 
 
Texan1211
10.1.5  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @10.1.4    6 months ago

NOT what he stated, implied, meant or inferred.

 
 
 
Dulay
10.1.6  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @10.1.5    6 months ago

Look up sarcasm. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
10.1.7  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @10.1.6    6 months ago

Look up condescending.

 
 
 
Dulay
10.1.8  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @10.1.7    6 months ago

Tissue?

 
 
 
Texan1211
10.1.9  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @10.1.8    6 months ago

No, I felt compelled to give my last one to some idiot screaming at the sky. Figured the poor soul was going to need it when he woke up tomorrow and Trump is still his President.

 
 
 
Tessylo
10.1.10  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @10.1    6 months ago

But the gasbag doesn't actually broadcast news - just rants and raves with the latest conspiracy theory.  

 
 
 
Heartland American
10.1.11  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Dulay @10.1.4    6 months ago

But unlike what I referred to, no one made a claim like what you said.  

 
 
 
Heartland American
10.1.12  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Texan1211 @10.1.7    6 months ago

Exactly.  The defining trait along with arrogance of so many people who are on the secular progressive left.  

 
 
 
Heartland American
10.1.13  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Dulay @10.1.8    6 months ago

No thanks, your need for it greatly outweighs ours so we will politely decline your most kind and generous offer.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
10.1.14  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @10.1.10    6 months ago
But the gasbag doesn't actually broadcast news - just rants and raves with the latest conspiracy theory.

Your radio only gets the one station?

CHANGE THE STATION!!

It  isn't hard--you can do it!

 
 
 
Dulay
10.1.15  Dulay  replied to  Heartland American @10.1.11    6 months ago

You should look up sarcasm too...

 
 
 
Dulay
10.1.16  Dulay  replied to  Heartland American @10.1.13    6 months ago

I'm not the one whining. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
10.1.17  Texan1211  replied to  Heartland American @10.1.13    6 months ago

I took it as he was asking for a tissue, not offering one!

 
 
 
Heartland American
10.1.18  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Texan1211 @10.1.17    6 months ago

Good point.  

 
 
 
Heartland American
10.1.19  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Dulay @10.1.16    6 months ago

I disagree with you.  

 
 
 
Dulay
10.1.20  Dulay  replied to  Heartland American @10.1.19    6 months ago

Shocker!

 
 
 
Heartland American
10.1.21  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Dulay @10.1.20    6 months ago

Not really.  I’m still living in the beautiful State of Jefferson too.  

 
 
 
Dulay
10.1.22  Dulay  replied to  Heartland American @10.1.21    6 months ago

Looks more like a state of delusion. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
10.1.23  MrFrost  replied to  Heartland American @10.1.21    6 months ago
Not really.  I’m still living in the beautiful State of Jefferson too.  

Which doesn't even exist. Sad. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
11  Tessylo    6 months ago

What 'news' does the bloated gasbag actually air?

 
 
 
Heartland American
11.1  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Tessylo @11    6 months ago

I guess that you will have to take the time to listen and be educated on that matter. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
11.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Heartland American @11.1    6 months ago

Listen to that turd?  Oh hell no!

Educated by listening to the turd?

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
11.1.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Heartland American @11.1    6 months ago
I guess that you will have to take the time to listen and be educated on that matter. 

Listening to Rush neither educates nor enlightens. His message is one of division, hate, bigotry, misogyny, open Islamophobia and barely hidden antisemitism. Sure, he's the poster boy for pill popping fat white pieces of shit who think way too much of themselves, but is that really who any rational person should be listening to for advice? It's like listening to the cookie monster talk about how amazing cookies are when your on a diet, accept that instead of cookies Rush expounds on white nationalism, Christian supremacy and male chauvinism.

 
 
 
Heartland American
11.1.3  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Tessylo @11.1.1    6 months ago

In the case of secular progressives, you bet!  He’s smarter than liberals with half his brain tied behind his back.  

 
 
 
lib50
11.1.4  lib50  replied to  Heartland American @11.1.3    6 months ago

His brain has been fried by his previous addictions.  The man has no marbles left except the ones in his mouth.  Listening to him is bad enough, but listening to the poor saps who buy his song and dance is worse.  Its pathetic how the uneducated are manipulated by the shysters. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
11.1.5  MrFrost  replied to  Heartland American @11.1    6 months ago
I guess that you will have to take the time to listen and be educated on that matter. 

I used to listen to rush pretty regularly....20 years ago. He is one of the reasons I left the republican party. The other? GWB's epic disaster of a presidency. 

I will never vote republican again. 

 
 
 
evilgenius
12  evilgenius    6 months ago

Limbaugh is a racist blowhard. He tried to be a sports caster but couldn't keep his racism out of his commentary. So he goes to racist conservative radio where his audience laps up his shit spewing with gusto.

Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it.

Only another racist would pay any attention to this sad sack of shit.

 
 
 
Tessylo
12.1  Tessylo  replied to  evilgenius @12    6 months ago

'Limbaugh is a racist blowhard. He tried to be a sports caster but couldn't keep his racism out of his commentary. So he goes to racist conservative radio where his audience laps up his shit spewing with gusto.

Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it.

[ Removed ]

jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Texan1211
12.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @12.1    6 months ago
Limbaugh is a racist blowhard. He tried to be a sports caster but couldn't keep his racism out of his commentary. So he goes to racist conservative radio where his audience laps up his shit spewing with gusto.
Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it.
Only another racist would pay any attention to this sad sack of shit.'

Wow. From not knowing that Limbaugh was even on the air about an hour ago to now being an expert on his show---LMAO!

 
 
 
Tessylo
12.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @12.1.1    6 months ago

I did not make that comment.  

I copied his comment to reply with a thumbs up.

You're whining to the wrong person.  

Note the quotes to imply I'm referencing his comment.

LMAO!  SMDH!

 
 
 
Texan1211
12.1.3  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @12.1.2    6 months ago

Your words:

Only another racist would pay any attention to this sad sack of shit.'

He's still on the air? Who knew?

My comment is correct and stands.

 
 
 
Tessylo
12.1.4  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @12.1.3    6 months ago

'Limbaugh is a racist blowhard. He tried to be a sports caster but couldn't keep his racism out of his commentary. So he goes to racist conservative radio where his audience laps up his shit spewing with gusto.

Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it.

Only another racist would pay any attention to this sad sack of shit.'

Evil Genius is 100% spot on.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
12.1.5  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @12.1.4    6 months ago

My comment is still true.

 
 
 
Tessylo
12.1.6  Tessylo  replied to  Tessylo @12.1    6 months ago

I was agreeing with Evil Genius. I didn't make the original comment.  WHATEVER

 
 
 
Texan1211
12.1.7  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @12.1.6    6 months ago
I was agreeing with Evil Genius. I didn't make the original comment. WHATEVER

Talking to yourself again?

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
13  Thrawn 31    6 months ago

Pretty sure a lot of people do not know what a coup is. 

 
 
 
Heartland American
13.1  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  Thrawn 31 @13    6 months ago

We know that Obama and Hillary along with their underlings attempted one against Trump.  

 
 
 
evilgenius
13.1.1  evilgenius  replied to  Heartland American @13.1    6 months ago
We know that Obama and Hillary along with their underlings attempted one against Trump.  

It worked. We've replaced The Don and Melania with hybrid lizard alien look-a-likes. 

 
 
 
Heartland American
13.1.2  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  evilgenius @13.1.1    6 months ago

it’s been awhile since I watched V.  

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
13.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Thrawn 31 @13    6 months ago

[Removed]

 
 
 
Dulay
14  Dulay    6 months ago

So Rush thinks that there was a conspiracy with Clinton, Obama and the deep state for a coup but NOBODY released the dossier until AFTER the election. 

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
luther28
15  luther28    6 months ago

Rush Limbaugh blames Hillary Clinton for failed ‘coup attempt’ against Trump

Hillary is running again?

I am usually paying attention, this information must have slipped through the cracks somehow or another.

 
 
 
Heartland American
15.1  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  luther28 @15    6 months ago

The key word here was failed.  Failed is a past tense word.  We are talking about what she did, not what she may be doing now or in the future.  

 
 
 
MrFrost
15.1.1  MrFrost  replied to  Heartland American @15.1    6 months ago

Actually the key word is, 'coup'. The FBI investigates people, regardless of who they happen to be, if they suspect a crime has been committed. The FBI investigating someone is not a 'coup', no matter how much you want to frame it that way. 

Once again, trump uses extreme hyperbole to get his base fired up. Sadly, far too many people actually bought it. There was no 'coup', sorry. 

 
 
 
Heartland American
15.1.2  seeder  Heartland American  replied to  MrFrost @15.1.1    6 months ago

There was no coup.  Only an attempt at one that failed. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
15.1.3  MrFrost  replied to  Heartland American @15.1.2    6 months ago
Only an attempt at one that failed. 

Um, no. Sorry. 

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online



32 visitors