Democrats' plan to rehash the Stormy Daniels story will go nowhere, and they know that

  
Via:  it-is-me  •  2 weeks ago  •  187 comments

Democrats' plan to rehash the Stormy Daniels story will go nowhere, and they know that
Raise your hand if you’re interested in hearing more about the aging sex workers and ridiculous campaign finance laws.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


The Washington Post reported Monday night that Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee “plan to make President Trump’s alleged involvement in a 2016 scheme to silence two women who claimed they had affairs with him major investigative focus this fall." The paper also said that they’re “preparing to hold hearings and call witnesses involved in hush-money payments to ex- Playboy model Karen McDougal and adult-film star Stormy Daniels as soon as October…”

The news must have given your sagging post-Labor Day spirit just the boost it needed.

This is what Democrats do nowadays. They put all their faith in the chase of some empty wish, and when it turns up empty, they whine that something went wrong.

After special counsel Robert Mueller wrapped up his exhaustive Russia probe without finding any proof of collusion with Russia, Democrats whined that Robert Mueller’s hands were tied.

After extensive reporting on Trump’s personal tax information by both the New York Times and Rachel Maddow revealed old and innocuous returns, Democrats demanded six additional years of Trump’s private tax returns.

And now, more than a month after prosecutors ended their investigation of a weak campaign finance allegation against the Trump campaign — it resulted only in a laughable guilty plea from Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen for something that wasn't even illegal — Democrats think holding a bunch of hearings can further fan their impeachment dreams that, to date, have never gone anywhere.

----------------------------------------

But they have another ghost to chase.

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
Find text within the comments Find 
 
It Is ME
1  seeder  It Is ME    2 weeks ago

Liberals still "Baying at the Moon" to this day.

bay at the moon
To make appeals in vain.

The barking of dogs at a full moon has been a metaphor for futile activity since the mid 17th century.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
1.1  KDMichigan  replied to  It Is ME @1    2 weeks ago

This sums up what all the left has. No plans, just screaming in the wind...

 
 
 
It Is ME
1.1.1  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  KDMichigan @1.1    2 weeks ago

If they can keep the bitching sailing in the winds until 2020, that's all they want. They don't care about "Impeaching Trump". It just "Sounds" good to their voters. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  KDMichigan @1.1    2 weeks ago

That's all the 'right' has.  No plans.  Just this 'president' ranting and raging between twitter on the shitter rants.  

 
 
 
It Is ME
1.1.3  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.2    2 weeks ago

Besides "Hearings", what is the Democrats plan for the country anyway ?

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.1.4  Tessylo  replied to  It Is ME @1.1.3    2 weeks ago

The oversight committee is doing their job by investigating this scumbag 'president'

 
 
 
It Is ME
1.1.5  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.4    2 weeks ago
The oversight committee is doing their job by investigating this scumbag 'president'

Correct ….. Just "Baying at the Moon" !

 
 
 
KDMichigan
1.1.6  KDMichigan  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.2    2 weeks ago
That's all the 'right' has.  No plans.

Hillarious.

If you haven't figured out what's going on in politics right now with what President Trump is doing I don't understand why you are even here unless it's just to troll?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
1.1.7  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  KDMichigan @1.1.6    2 weeks ago
unless it's just to troll

By George I think you've got it!! 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
1.1.8  igknorantzrulz  replied to  KDMichigan @1.1    2 weeks ago
just screaming in the wind...

i thought Stormy would of been more attractive than that , but, isn't this like

"Raise your hand if you’re interested in hearing more about the aging sex workers and ridiculous campaign finance laws."
what the GOP did with the Benghazi he\arings ...?
Cause after 4 or 5, you ussually need a sixth           sense
lessness investigation when in this case, individual 1, if not for being the pos potUS, would have been a co indicted co defendant cohabitating with convicts, cause coconspirator needs shown the back door, as no one has ever seen someone, whom lacks convictions, yet not convicted, due to the so low dredger in chief being protected by the DOJ and a rule that is sure to be removed as soon as the ones with SOME morals n ethix regain two parts of the bounced chex system, that has seriously failed US All, and most definitely, the ones with minds too small,
to
so as
think this doesn't matter,
cause so full of $hit ,
are those who've denied the actual Truth,
exploding inside the porcelain golden throne, so filled with the, 
Splatter
 
 
 
Tessylo
1.1.9  Tessylo  replied to  KDMichigan @1.1.6    2 weeks ago

I'm waiting for someone to let us know what this 'president' is doing other than looting the treasury as fat as his fat little fingers will allow.  

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
1.1.10  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.9    2 weeks ago
looting the treasury

How so? Please be specific. Thanks in advance.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
1.1.11  1stwarrior  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.1.10    2 weeks ago

Youll have to wait a verrrrryyyyyy long time to get an answer to that question.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
1.1.12  KDMichigan  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.9    2 weeks ago
I'm waiting for someone to let us know what this 'president' is doing

Two people have posted what he is doing and here you are still wondering...jrSmiley_26_smiley_image.gif

other than looting the treasury as fat as his fat little fingers will allow.

Is this this the only thing you are familiar with?

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.1.13  Tessylo  replied to  KDMichigan @1.1.12    2 weeks ago

That's all the turd 'president' is doing.  

 
 
 
MUVA
1.1.14  MUVA  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.13    2 weeks ago

Where's the beef you know the evidence even a Mother Jones or The Atlantic articular will suffice if you can find one.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
1.1.16  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  MUVA @1.1.14    2 weeks ago

**Crickets**

 
 
 
CometRider
1.1.17  CometRider  replied to  It Is ME @1.1.3    2 weeks ago
Besides "Hearings", what is the Democrats plan for the country anyway ?

Eliminate cars, planes, and cows. Turn the middle class into working poor with a ridiculous tax hike. 

 
 
 
dennis smith
1.1.18  dennis smith  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.13    one week ago

Trump has done more for America in less than 2 years the Obama (the original shitstain) did in 8 years)

 
 
 
It Is ME
1.1.19  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  CometRider @1.1.17    one week ago
Eliminate cars, planes, and cows. Turn the middle class into working poor with a ridiculous tax hike

Democrats just need "Lemmings" !

256

 
 
 
SteevieGee
1.2  SteevieGee  replied to  It Is ME @1    2 weeks ago

I haven't heard anything at all about Stormy Daniels for several months...  That is, until you brought it up.

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
1.2.1  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  SteevieGee @1.2    2 weeks ago

She is very talented. It's shocking those things fit in her butt.

 
 
 
It Is ME
1.2.2  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  SteevieGee @1.2    one week ago

Apparently, the "News" is bored with antics like this too ! jrSmiley_18_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
2  Sean Treacy    2 weeks ago

A party out of ideas resorts to this. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    2 weeks ago

A party out of ideas resorts to this. 

may b u oughta sharpen your sharpie, cause the GOP  is in no way the sharpest HOES in the shed full of TOOLZ

 
 
 
It Is ME
2.1.1  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.1    2 weeks ago
may b u oughta sharpen your sharpie, cause the GOP  is in no way the sharpest HOES in the shed full of TOOLZ

Yet …… Things have been-a-happenin' (Accomplished). Even "Dull" still can eliminate weeds.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.1.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  It Is ME @2.1.1    2 weeks ago

try a weedwacker

 
 
 
It Is ME
2.1.3  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.1.2    2 weeks ago

Stick with what "Works".

 
 
 
Tessylo
3  Tessylo    2 weeks ago

What ideas do the cons have?

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.1  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @3    2 weeks ago
What ideas do the cons have?

You don't know what Trump and the Republicans have already accomplished since 2017 ?

You don't know what the Democrats want to Accomplish besides Hearings ?

You'd think someone that Hates Trump and the Republicans so much, would at least know what their own party was going to do and change for the betterment of the country !

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  It Is ME @3.1    2 weeks ago

I know what they've accomplished, the cons, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING !

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.1.2  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.1    2 weeks ago
I know what they've accomplished, the cons, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING !

hmmmmmmm …… jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
WallyW
3.1.3  WallyW  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.1    2 weeks ago

What have the pro(gressives) accomplished, or have planned?

ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.1.4  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.1    2 weeks ago

If one cares to read jrSmiley_18_smiley_image.gif , here's great list:

The List Of President Trump's Accomplishments So Far"

https://710wor.iheart.com/featured/mark-simone/content/2019-03-09-the-list-of-president-trumps-accomplishments-so-far/

Now, What do the Democrats "Want" to accomplish again ?

Is more Hearings still all they have ?

 
 
 
Dulay
3.1.5  Dulay  replied to  It Is ME @3.1.4    2 weeks ago
If one cares to read , here's great list:

Your 'great list' includes ONE piece of original legislation, the tax cut that added over a TRILLION to the deficit. 

Since your article it criticizing the Democrats in Congress, exactly HOW does your list  prove that the GOP Congress has accomplished anything other than add to the deficit?  

Is more Hearings still all they have ?

In this session, the House has passed 35 bills, only 9 of which became law and 7 of those are PO designations. The rest sit on McConnell's desk. 

BTFW, ALL of the bills that became law this session originated in the Democratic run house. 

As for the Senate, 12 bills passed, 6 filed by Democrats, 2 of which became law. 

So only 6 bills filed by the GOP Congress that they could get through their own house and none have become law. 

What was it you were saying about the Democratic Congress again? 

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.1.6  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Dulay @3.1.5    2 weeks ago
Your 'great list' includes ONE piece of original legislation, the tax cut that added over a TRILLION to the deficit. 

Tax cuts don't add to the deficit. Spending does. Like any other business that doesn't want to go broke, one adjusts based on what's coming in. Government doesn't do that.

"What was it you were saying about the Democratic Congress again?" 

I "Said" nothing. I asked a "Question" !

You know the difference right ?

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.1.7  Tessylo  replied to  Dulay @3.1.5    2 weeks ago

Deficits only matter when a Democrat is President.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
3.1.8  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Dulay @3.1.5    2 weeks ago
In this session, the House has passed 35 bills, only 9 of which became law and 7 of those are PO designations. The rest sit on McConnell's desk.

And just HOW is the US suffering because those bills are sitting? 

**Clue - it isn't**

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
3.1.9  igknorantzrulz  replied to  It Is ME @3.1.6    2 weeks ago
I "Said" nothing. I asked a "Question" !

when i 'ask' a "Question", 

i feel like i've "Said"        SOMETHING

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.1.10  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.1.9    2 weeks ago
i feel like i've "Said"        SOMETHING

Feelings, Nothing more than Feelings …….

Say;

a. To state as an opinion or judgment; declare: I say let's eat out.
b. To state as a determination of fact:

Past tense; Said

 
 
 
Dulay
3.1.11  Dulay  replied to  It Is ME @3.1.6    2 weeks ago
Tax cuts don't add to the deficit.

Utter bullshit. 

I "Said" nothing.

You 'Said' plenty but I agree with your assessment of it's value. 

I asked a "Question" !

You got an answer and it doesn't look that you like it much. 

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.1.12  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Dulay @3.1.11    2 weeks ago
Tax cuts don't add to the deficit.
Utter bullshit. 

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

"You got an answer and it doesn't look that you like it much."

Look harder. I said not one thing, one way or another, about your "List" !

You just like to make stuff up, dontchya ! jrSmiley_98_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
MrFrost
3.1.13  MrFrost  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1.8    2 weeks ago
And just HOW is the US suffering because those bills are sitting? 

Because some of them deal with cyber security to protect our election process, (all of which Moscow Mitch has refused to even vote on). 

 
 
 
Dulay
3.1.14  Dulay  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1.8    2 weeks ago
And just HOW is the US suffering because those bills are sitting? 
**Clue - it isn't**

So you don't think that FY 2020 Appropriations bills sitting ignored on McConnell's desk is an issue? Perhaps you should review the 'suffering' in the US the last time the Senate failed to pass appropriations on a timely basis...

BTW, the Trump Administration was so desperate to try to hide that suffering, Trump had his Interior Dept. violate federal law. 

BTW, 21 of those are 'Armed services and National Security' bills, 27 are DHS bills. 

Ya, no worries Just...

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
3.1.15  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Dulay @3.1.14    2 weeks ago

 I see you and Mr. Frost BOTH missed the point. I asked, "And just HOW is the US suffering because those bills are sitting". Now, both have answered (IYUO) that it is POSSBILY things IN THE FUTURE. NOT what it is doing now. So again, please answer the question or just run. Your choice of course.

 
 
 
loki12
3.1.16  loki12  replied to  Dulay @3.1.5    2 weeks ago
I'm sure you feel this is really impressive  but to rational people this is laughable at best and abject ignorance that somebody would actually post it as an accomplishment. lets look at it line by line.

In this session, the House has passed 35 bills, only 9 of which became law and 7 of those are PO designations. The rest sit on McConnell's desk. 

Wow! 435 members of the house and without a filibuster and the republicans having zero ability to stop any legislation Nancy has got a grand total of 35 passed? that worthless cunt obviously cant't control her house.

BTFW, ALL of the bills that became law this session originated in the Democratic run house. 

Wow again, a whole nine, that Mitch got through the Senate and you give Nancy credit.

As for the Senate, 12 bills passed, 6 filed by Democrats, 2 of which became law. 

So Mitch has got 12 passed in spite of the shithead dems blocking every thing. and 12 out of 100 senators that's 12 percent. Nancy has got 35 out of 435, that 8% Mitch is doing a 50% better job than Miss Piggy in the house. 

WTF? you write this, BTFW, ALL of the bills that became law this session originated in the Democratic run house.  And then follow with this, As for the Senate, 12 bills passed, 6 filed by Democrats, 2 of which became law. So which is it? did they all come from the house or did 2 come from the Senate? You are so fucked up with partisan hate you can't even keep your bullshit straight.

So only 6 bills filed by the GOP Congress that they could get through their own house and none have become law. 

What was it you were saying about the Democratic Congress again?  It obvious to a non-partisan hack what he is saying, in spite of the democrats blocking everything in the Senate and Nancy refusing to pass a single republican bill, Bipartisan Mitch has passed democrat legislation while the POS democrats can only say no to everything and investigate.  your own post demonstrates this. Dem Bills passed in the Senate and sent to the President. republican bills die in Nancy's antisemitic cesspool of a house. 

 
 
 
Dulay
3.1.17  Dulay  replied to  loki12 @3.1.16    2 weeks ago
the republicans having zero ability to stop any legislation

One of the two bills originating in the House that passed the Senate was Sponsored/filed by a GOP Congressman. 

FAIL!

Wow again, a whole nine, that Mitch got through the Senate and you give Nancy credit.

I didn't mention Nancy. Strawman. 

So Mitch has got 12 passed in spite of the shithead dems blocking every thing. and 12 out of 100 senators that's 12 percent.

First of all, as I said, 6 of those 12 had Democratic sponsors. 

Secondly, if the dems are 'blocking everything' then NONE of those bills should have passed. 

Your comment doesn't make any sense, though yours rarely do. 

So which is it? did they all come from the house or did 2 come from the Senate? You are so fucked up with partisan hate you can't even keep your bullshit straight.

Well that just proves just how ignorant you are of the process in the Congress. I'm not inclined to waste my time trying to bring you up to speed. 

It obvious to a non-partisan hack what he is saying,

So you speak for non-partisan hacks. Got ya. 

in spite of the democrats blocking everything in the Senate and Nancy refusing to pass a single republican bill, Bipartisan Mitch has passed democrat legislation while the POS democrats can only say no to everything and investigate. your own post demonstrates this. Dem Bills passed in the Senate and sent to the President. republican bills die in Nancy's antisemitic cesspool of a house. 

So the Senate has passed bills yet you insist that the Dems block everything. 

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
loki12
3.1.18  loki12  replied to  Dulay @3.1.17    2 weeks ago
FAIL!

That pretty much sums up your entire post and subsequent deflections. 

So the Senate has passed bills yet you insist that the Dems block everything. 

The fucking retard democrats in the Senate do block everything, that is obvious by the lack of movement of bills, but go ahead and blame Mitch, I hear all the low functioning children do that, or they just call him Moscow Mitch because they lack originality and the ability to think for themselves.

 
 
 
loki12
3.1.19  loki12  replied to  Dulay @3.1.17    2 weeks ago
So you speak for non-partisan hacks.

Somebody has too. it's obvious you can't.  Bleat Moscow Mitch! I hear all the kids are doing it now. 

 
 
 
Dulay
3.1.20  Dulay  replied to  loki12 @3.1.18    2 weeks ago
That pretty much sums up your entire post and subsequent deflections.

What deflections? 

The fucking retard democrats in the Senate do block everything

One would have to be willfully obtuse to keep repeating the same obviously false statement. 

 
 
 
Dulay
3.1.21  Dulay  replied to  loki12 @3.1.19    2 weeks ago
Somebody has too.

Why? 

Do you hold the opinion of hacks in such high regard? 

 
 
 
dennis smith
3.1.22  dennis smith  replied to  Dulay @3.1.5    one week ago

In this session, the House has passed 35 bills, only 9 of which became law and 7 of those are PO designations. The rest sit on McConnell's desk.

The Dems would do well to work on laws which have enough merit to be taken to a vote by the Senate. 

 
 
 
dennis smith
3.1.23  dennis smith  replied to  Dulay @3.1.17    one week ago

Deflection from the facts as usual.

 
 
 
Dulay
3.1.24  Dulay  replied to  dennis smith @3.1.22    one week ago
The Dems would do well to work on laws which have enough merit to be taken to a vote by the Senate.

Oh please DO tell me all about your vast knowledge of the merits of those bills that have passed the House dennis. 

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dulay
3.1.25  Dulay  replied to  dennis smith @3.1.23    one week ago
Deflection from the facts as usual.

Your comment has no value, as usual. 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
3.2  KDMichigan  replied to  Tessylo @3    2 weeks ago
What ideas do the cons have?

I'm not going to overload It Is Me seed with what the "cons" have accomplished. 

Maybe you might find this helpful...

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/trumps-list-289-accomplishments-in-just-20-months-relentless-promise-keeping

Just let me know if you need anymore helpful references, I'm more than willing to help. 

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.1  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2    2 weeks ago

Oops, sorry, hadn't scrolled down yet. Just saw your list after I put the one I had up.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
3.2.2  KDMichigan  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.1    2 weeks ago
Oops, sorry, hadn't scrolled down yet.

Doesn't matter you could post it 5 times and people would still claim ignorance.

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.3  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.2    2 weeks ago

It doesn't hurt to keep trying.

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.2.4  Tessylo  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.3    2 weeks ago

What has this 'president' accomplished that benefits anyone other than himself and his rich cronies?

 
 
 
MUVA
3.2.5  MUVA  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.4    2 weeks ago

He has made my life even more wonderful that it was before he became president.

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.2.6  Tessylo  replied to  MUVA @3.2.5    2 weeks ago

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.2.7  Tessylo  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2    2 weeks ago

You've never helped and never will.  

 
 
 
KDMichigan
3.2.8  KDMichigan  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.3    2 weeks ago
It doesn't hurt to keep trying.

What did I tell ya. jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
JBB
3.2.9  JBB  replied to  MUVA @3.2.5    2 weeks ago

So, that explains you being here 24/7 bitching about all your resentments...

With all your businesses and living the high life how do you find the time?

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.10  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.8    2 weeks ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.2.11  Tessylo  replied to  JBB @3.2.9    2 weeks ago

The business(es) that he inherited from his wife's family.

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.12  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.4    2 weeks ago
What has this 'president' accomplished that benefits anyone other than himself and his rich cronies?

You'll have to read the list and decide that on your own (although I already know what your answer will be).

I'm doing much better than I did from 2009 to 2016, and I'm not a Cronies, nor am I the President of the United States !

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.13  Dulay  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2    2 weeks ago
For the first time in more than a decade, growth is projected to exceed 3 percent over the calendar year.

Yet the prediction didn't come to pass. 2.9 for 2018. HOW is that a Trump 'accomplishment'? 

Your list is pathetic. EO's aren't accomplishments. Do you count the innumerable 'proposed' infrastructure plans that have gone nowhere? How is the USDA doing what they've done in other administrations a Trump accomplishment? Sheesh, do you want to give Trump credit for the Earth spinning? 

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.14  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Dulay @3.2.13    2 weeks ago
EO's aren't accomplishments.

They're not ? jrSmiley_97_smiley_image.gif

"Executive orders are issued under specific statutory authority from Congress and have the force and effect of law. Federal courts consider such orders to be the equivalent of federal statutes. In addition, regulations that are enacted to carry out these executive orders have the status of law . " 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
3.2.15  KDMichigan  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.7    2 weeks ago
You've never helped and never will.  

 Sadly there is no help for those who refuse to help themselves.

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.2.16  Tessylo  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.15    2 weeks ago

jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
MUVA
3.2.17  MUVA  replied to  JBB @3.2.9    2 weeks ago

It is hard but I make time to keep you informed I’m at work right now by the way.

 
 
 
MUVA
3.2.18  MUVA  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.11    2 weeks ago

No it is multiple businesses under one corporation thanks for the interest.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
3.2.19  KDMichigan  replied to  Dulay @3.2.13    2 weeks ago
Yet the prediction didn't come to pass.

Out of a list of 289 you found one that was off by .1 % in your opinion.

Way to go Dulay you are so freaking awesome. jrSmiley_12_smiley_image.gif

Hey everyone we need to give post 3.2.13 a "like" as appreciation for Dulay's great accomplishment.  

 
 
 
KDMichigan
3.2.20  KDMichigan  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.16    2 weeks ago

I know right, that's your problem that it makes no sense, I can't help you.

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.2.21  Tessylo  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.20    2 weeks ago

Your comments are the ones that don't make sense and you're correct, you cannot help me, never have, never will.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.2.22  Tessylo  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.14    2 weeks ago

No, they're not !

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.2.23  Tessylo  replied to  MUVA @3.2.18    2 weeks ago

Given to you/inherited from your wifes' family.  

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
3.2.24  Dean Moriarty  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.23    2 weeks ago

He said he bought it from them. It is not uncommon that family businesses are sold to other family members. 

 
 
 
MUVA
3.2.25  MUVA  replied to  Dean Moriarty @3.2.24    2 weeks ago

Yep plus you would have to no my father in law as much as I admire him he ain’t giving shit away.I find it funny she thinks that’s some type of put down.

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.26  Dulay  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.14    2 weeks ago
They're not ?

No, they're not. EO's don't require anything more than a pen, or in Trump's case, a sharpie.

Remember when y'all thought EO's were a 'bad thing'? Now they're 'accomplishments'. Sheesh talk about hypocrisy. 

 
 
 
Sunshine
3.2.27  Sunshine  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.23    2 weeks ago

People work hard to leave something for their families.  

Why do you have a problem with it?

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.28  Dulay  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.19    2 weeks ago
Out of a list of 289 you found one that was off by .1 % in your opinion.

That isn't my opinion, that's the Trump Administration's data. 

BTFW, did you miss the fact that I mentioned other points? 

Way to go Dulay you are so freaking awesome.

You're not

Hey everyone we need to give post 3.2.13 a "like" as appreciation for Dulay's great accomplishment. 

Since you're the guy who thinks that Trump should get credit for other's accomplishments, shouldn't YOU be getting 'my' likes? 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
3.2.29  KDMichigan  replied to  Sunshine @3.2.27    2 weeks ago
Why do you have a problem with it?

I think it's that little thing called jealousy. It's a awful burden.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
3.2.30  KDMichigan  replied to  Dulay @3.2.28    2 weeks ago
Since you're the guy

Excuse me, but I take offense of your use of gender specific pronouns.

In future correspondents to me plz use gender neutral pronouns.

Thank you. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
3.2.31  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.30    2 weeks ago

384

 
 
 
Sunshine
3.2.32  Sunshine  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.2.31    2 weeks ago

jrSmiley_4_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.33  Dulay  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.30    2 weeks ago
In future correspondents to me plz use gender neutral pronouns.

No worries. 

Since you're the it who thinks that Trump should get credit for other's accomplishments, shouldn't YOU be getting 'my' likes?

 
 
 
KDMichigan
3.2.34  KDMichigan  replied to  Dulay @3.2.33    2 weeks ago
Since you're the it

What's a it? Is that how you refer to yourself? As usual you make no sense with your babbling.

Tell you what, I'll let you research general neutral pronouns and you can get back with me okay ….Comrade. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.2.35  Tessylo  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.29    2 weeks ago

Nah, I work for a living.  

 
 
 
MUVA
3.2.36  MUVA  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.35    2 weeks ago

Not to be noisy or a smart ass what do you do for a living?By the way I scrape boat bottoms and work on waste systems on some boats so I don't judge what people do for work.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
3.2.37  KDMichigan  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.35    2 weeks ago
Nah, I work for a living.  

[deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.2.38  Tessylo  replied to  MUVA @3.2.36    2 weeks ago

I work at a University Hospital for the School of Medicine.  I work with 3rd & 4th year Medical students.  I don't judge people either for where they work or what they do for a living.  

Peace.  

I'm asking for a truce and hope you accept.

I promise to lay off the smart ass comments about you and your business.  

 
 
 
devangelical
3.2.39  devangelical  replied to  MUVA @3.2.36    2 weeks ago
I scrape boat bottoms and work on waste systems

only boats?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
3.2.40  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.37    2 weeks ago

removed for context

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
3.2.41  igknorantzrulz  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.34    2 weeks ago
What's a it? Is that how you refer to yourself? As usual you make no sense with your babbling.

babble /?   let's see

i'd go with not a he or she, so you are left with

'it'  .

i see myself as anti noun, as pro nouns   are either uncles, or too

difficult to

pro-nounciate      at least 4 me 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
3.2.42  KDMichigan  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.41    2 weeks ago

Maybe this will help Comrade.

Here is a list of gender-neutral pronouns:
He/She -- Zie, Sie, Ey, Ve, Tey, E
Him/Her -- Zim, Sie, Em, Ver, Ter, Em
His/Her -- Zir, Hir, Eir, Vis, Tem, Eir
His/Hers -- Zis, Hirs, Eirs, Vers, Ters, Eirs
Himself/Herself -- Zieself, Hirself, Eirself, Verself, Terself, Emself

https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/gender-neutral-pronouns

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
3.2.43  igknorantzrulz  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.42    2 weeks ago
Here is a list of gender-neutral pronouns:

I've often not read about them, usually only in a vehicle in a park,  or with the Ebrake on, while i take one, as when in mode neutral, vessel can roll   a way not meant for he, she, or they

Interesting link though, i guess, but

i b leave you knead knot be inn the library, a tempting to locate a catalog, filled with cards, while the sexy glasses wearing librarian says to ya       SSSSSSHHHHHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

IT,   

u sure r cute,    cause that sexy librarian is a MANLY wOMAN or a GIRLY mAN,

staring down their snoot,  at   yute(joe Pesci style)

leavin you eatin crow out of apple American Pie   ,

as you R band from band camp, cause you lost your Flute,

so

b 4 u go tootin your neutral gender phender bender vehicle's horn, parked in a park driving in reverse while attempting to teach the fine coarse and you get bought for seeking buyers remorse

,

Ken you not see why Democrats have not a choice,

when it comes to the good old boys of the Grand Old Party

being surprised

about a party,

making the exact same damn choice, they would have made a year or two ago...

oh

idaho don't know, but hoes, in my book, are gender neutral...

unless of course in a park in the dark

cause this changes everything !  no S/ arc

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.44  Dulay  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.34    2 weeks ago
What's a it?

It is a perfectly serviceable gender neutral pronoun. Isn't that how you insisted on being referred to? 

I don't need to research simple English. If you have another pronoun you want to be referred as, fucking spit it out and be done with it. 

BTFW, guy isn't a pronoun. 

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.45  Dulay  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.42    2 weeks ago

Where's the one for 'guy'? 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
3.2.46  KDMichigan  replied to  Dulay @3.2.44    2 weeks ago
It is a perfectly serviceable gender neutral pronoun.

Is "It" how you would refer to yourself? 

Because "Since you're the it " is not proper for gender neutral pronouns.

If you have another pronoun you want to be referred as, fucking spit it out and be done with it.

No problem. Call me Comrade.

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.47  Dulay  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.46    2 weeks ago
Is "It" how you would refer to yourself? 

No, I'm not the one that needs to be called a gender neutral pronoun, YOU ARE. 

Because "Since you're the it " is not proper for gender neutral pronouns.

Sure it is...

No problem. Call me Comrade.

Comrade is not a pronoun and it isn't on your 'proper' gender neutral pronoun list. It doesn't look like you know want you want. 

 
 
 
MUVA
3.2.48  MUVA  replied to  devangelical @3.2.39    2 weeks ago

Yes only boats I do warranty work on Raritan waste systems and dark water systems.

 
 
 
MUVA
3.2.49  MUVA  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.38    2 weeks ago

You may have seen me post this before but my eldest son is a Doctor and my middle son is at med school EVMS becoming a PA they got the smarts and looks from their mom. 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
3.2.50  KDMichigan  replied to  Dulay @3.2.45    2 weeks ago
Where's the one for 'guy'? 

Who says I'm a guy, Comrade?

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.2.51  Tessylo  replied to  MUVA @3.2.49    2 weeks ago

My one nephew was going to be a physician's assistant but has decided to go to Medical School and become a doctor as well.  It would really be something if he came to this/my school.  I would love it!  

I'm so proud of him.  You must be so proud as well.

He is also half black, half white. 

His dad is black. 

Quite handsome as well.

Truce?  

Peace?

 
 
 
MUVA
3.2.52  MUVA  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.51    2 weeks ago

I forgot in my post to say yes to peace.jrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif My middle son has been taken a little longer than his brother to get done with school he left college in his last year because he had a concussion from playing soccer it set him back a year. 

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.53  Dulay  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.50    2 weeks ago
Who says I'm a guy, Comrade?

You're not answering my question so I won't be answering yours. 

I'm not your Comrade, use my proper name. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
3.2.54  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Dulay @3.2.53    2 weeks ago
'm not your Comrad

apparently i am as well

but,

whatever.

Don't you feel the comradery, we share being labeled the same ?

Me neither, but i'm not Russian to judgement, either.

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.55  Dulay  replied to  Dulay @3.2.53    2 weeks ago

Oh and BTW, based on your prior posts, either you're a guy or you're a lesbian. Pick one.

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.2.56  Tessylo  replied to  MUVA @3.2.52    2 weeks ago

jrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_24_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_15_smiley_image.gif to peace!

That's too bad!  I hope he's doing well now.  All the best to your fine young man, men.

 
 
 
charger 383
3.2.57  charger 383  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.56    2 weeks ago

both you and MUVA have things to be proud of and do valuable work

 
 
 
KDMichigan
3.2.58  KDMichigan  replied to  Dulay @3.2.55    2 weeks ago
Oh and BTW, based on your prior posts, either you're a guy or you're a lesbian. Pick one.

I'll think I'll pick being a lesbian, then I can justify having a self righteous attitude.

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
3.2.59  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  Dulay @3.2.55    2 weeks ago
Oh and BTW, based on your prior posts, either you're a guy or you're a lesbian. Pick one.

You don't have to pick one anymore. We have 140 confusions including non-binary.

Good Comrades report gender nazis for ignoring the 140 genders.

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.60  Dulay  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.58    one week ago
I'll think I'll pick being a lesbian,

Your wife will have new expectations. 

then I can justify having a self righteous attitude.

I doubt it. 

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.61  Dulay  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @3.2.59    one week ago

Looks like you missed the predicate of my comment BF. 

 
 
 
dennis smith
3.2.62  dennis smith  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.14    one week ago

Some Dem posters just cannot read and comprehend. They probably cannot chew gum and walk at the same time either.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
3.2.63  KDMichigan  replied to  Dulay @3.2.60    one week ago
Your wife will have new expectations. 

I doubt that Dulay, anyone can be a carpet muncher, she likes the D.

And another thing keep my family out of your mouth.

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.2.64  Tessylo  replied to  charger 383 @3.2.57    one week ago

Thanks Charger!

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.65  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Dulay @3.2.26    one week ago
No, they're not.

So ….. Actual new "Law" means nothing. Got it !  jrSmiley_84_smiley_image.gif

"Remember when y'all thought EO's were a 'bad thing'? Now they're 'accomplishments'. Sheesh talk about hypocrisy."

i don't remember saying anything of the sort !

See ....... you really DO just make stuff up ! jrSmiley_36_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.66  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.22    one week ago

Quick.....

What's an EO ?

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.67  Dulay  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.63    one week ago
I doubt that Dulay, anyone can be a carpet muncher, she likes the D.

So you ARE a guy. So now, what did you choose as a gender neutral pronoun? 

And another thing keep my family out of your mouth.

I thought you said 'she likes the D'. 

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.68  Dulay  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.65    one week ago
So ….. Actual new "Law" means nothing. Got it !

What 'new 'Law' are you bloviating about? 

i don't remember saying anything of the sort ! See ....... you really DO just make stuff up !

I didn't say you said anything. 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
3.2.69  KDMichigan  replied to  Dulay @3.2.67    one week ago
I thought you said 'she likes the D'. 

Something you know nothing about, fake ones don't count, just ask your wife.

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.70  Dulay  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.69    one week ago
Something you know nothing about,

You're so right! I know nothing about liking D. 

fake ones don't count, just ask your wife.

I just did. She said she had not use for fake D but since millions have been sold, someone must. 

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.71  Dulay  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.65    one week ago

Still waiting for you to cite those 'new laws' It. 

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.72  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Dulay @3.2.71    one week ago
Still waiting for you to cite those 'new laws' It. 

Read Trumps E.O.'s, including Obama's.

That should help you.....maybe !

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.73  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Dulay @3.2.68    one week ago
What 'new 'Law' are you bloviating about?

You still don't know what an E.O. is or does ? jrSmiley_90_smiley_image.gif

"I didn't say you said anything."

YOUR "y'all" says other wise. jrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif

Maybe you should "think" , before you type ? jrSmiley_87_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.2.74  Tessylo  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.73    one week ago
'Maybe you should "think" , before you type ?'

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.75  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.74    one week ago

Stumped ?

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.76  Dulay  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.72    one week ago
Read Trumps E.O.'s, including Obama's. That should help you.....maybe !

I'm not the one that needs help, you are.

Your deflection merely proves that you pulled the 'new 'Laws' comment from your nether regions. You asked another member to tell you what an EO is yet it's pretty fucking obvious that you don't know that answer yourself. 

EO's don't create 'new 'Laws'. An EO has NO AUTHORITY, in and of itself.

PERIOD full stop. 

It would behoove you to follow your own advice, READ Trump's EO's and maybe you'll  recognize that EVERY ONE OF THEM cites a specific provision of the Constitution, a statute or a treaty as a basis for it's authority. 

Hell, you could just read the fucking source of the quote you posted [without citation] to educate yourself on EO's.

Or, as expected, you could just keep spewing unfounded bullshit and keep hammering home all lack of credibility. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.2.77  Tessylo  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.75    one week ago

Yes you are, as usual.  

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.78  Dulay  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.73    one week ago
You still don't know what an E.O. is or does ?

Nope, that's you It. 

As much as you like to pretend, you haven't a fucking clue what you're talking about. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.2.79  Tessylo  replied to  dennis smith @3.2.62    one week ago

Oh how original!  Did you think of that one all by yourself?

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.80  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Dulay @3.2.76    one week ago
EO's don't create 'new 'Laws'. An EO has NO AUTHORITY, in and of itself.

Ya....sure. jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

https://legaldictionary.net/executive-order/

"The U.S. Constitution gives the American President authority to create laws, or decide how an existing law should be carried out, through the use of executive orders. Because executive orders do not require congressional approval, the President can set important policy while sidestepping public debate. Executive orders may be used for a broad range of issues, from environmental conservation and protection, to prohibiting discrimination, and sending troops to other countries."

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.81  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Dulay @3.2.78    one week ago
Nope, that's you It.  As much as you like to pretend, you haven't a fucking clue what you're talking about. 

Cry me a river (go on and just)
Cry me a river (go on and just)
Cry me a river (baby, go on and just)
Cry me a river

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.82  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.77    one week ago
Yes you are, as usual. 

Oh yeah ? jrSmiley_97_smiley_image.gif

bet me ! jrSmiley_18_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
KDMichigan
3.2.83  KDMichigan  replied to  Dulay @3.2.70    6 days ago
She said she had not use for fake D but since millions have been sold,

So she likes the real sausage too? Understandable.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
3.2.84  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  MUVA @3.2.49    6 days ago

I am betting that they got a fair amount of the work ethic concept from you both.

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.85  Dulay  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.80    6 days ago
The U.S. Constitution gives the American President authority to create laws

So an EO has NO AUTHORITIY in and of itself. 

I note that you cited a different source than the one you quoted from initially. Why?

Didn't you like what the first sentence in that article:

Executive Order: A presidential policy directive that implements or interprets a federal statute, a constitutional provision, or a treaty.

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Executive+Order

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.86  Dulay  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.81    6 days ago

I prefer the original. 

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.87  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Dulay @3.2.86    6 days ago
I prefer the original.

I can tell !

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.88  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Dulay @3.2.85    6 days ago
So an EO has NO AUTHORITIY in and of itself. 

It does !

"Didn't you like what the first sentence in that article:"

"Executive Order: A presidential policy directive that implements or interprets a federal statute, a constitutional provision, or a treaty."

And becomes "LAW" when signed. jrSmiley_98_smiley_image.gif

An Accomplishment for sure ! jrSmiley_100_smiley_image.jpg

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.89  Dulay  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.88    6 days ago
It does !

Prove it. Cite a Trump EO that created a 'new law'. I'll wait...

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.90  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Dulay @3.2.89    6 days ago
 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.91  Dulay  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.90    5 days ago
That wasn't hard !

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

An act of Congress is NOT an EO. What a SAD failed attempt at deflection from the fact that you can't support the bullshit you post. 

You need a better Schtick ! 

Why? You've proven that you're clueless about WTF you're talking about. 

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.92  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Dulay @3.2.91    5 days ago

You asked....You Received ….. You didn't like it ! jrSmiley_84_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.93  Dulay  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.92    5 days ago
You asked....You Received ….. You didn't like it !

I asked, you posted bullshit. 

 
 
 
It Is ME
3.2.94  seeder  It Is ME  replied to  Dulay @3.2.93    5 days ago
you posted bullshit. 

Only in YOUR mind ….. Only in YOUR Mind? jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Sunshine
4  Sunshine    2 weeks ago

Your tax dollars hard at work folks.

 
 
 
MUVA
4.1  MUVA  replied to  Sunshine @4    2 weeks ago

This is what congressmen have a budget and a staff for to waste money.

 
 
 
MrFrost
5  MrFrost    2 weeks ago

But donny said that the "Stormy Daniels thing" was all fake news? 

Oh wait.. he lied about that too. 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
5.1  KDMichigan  replied to  MrFrost @5    2 weeks ago
But donny

256

 
 
 
Tessylo
5.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  KDMichigan @5.1    2 weeks ago

Is that the only dumb ass meme you got besides Mrs. Obama with a penis?

 
 
 
MUVA
5.1.2  MUVA  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.1    2 weeks ago

So you admit she has man junk.

 
 
 
MrFrost
5.1.3  MrFrost  replied to  KDMichigan @5.1    2 weeks ago

Wow, the same old meme, I am guessing that you think stormy daniels has NOTHING to do with trump, right? 

512

 
 
 
MrFrost
5.1.4  MrFrost  replied to  MUVA @5.1.2    2 weeks ago

So you admit she has man junk.

512

 
 
 
KDMichigan
5.1.5  KDMichigan  replied to  MrFrost @5.1.4    2 weeks ago

More proof the left can't meme.
I thought she was a porn star.
You can go online and see her naked right? If you think she has a dick I hate to break some bad news to you...You have your genitals mixed up.

Maybe this will help clear things up for you....

https://health.howstuffworks.com/sexual-health/sexuality/genitals-and-genitalia-dictionary.htm

 
 
 
MrFrost
5.1.6  MrFrost  replied to  KDMichigan @5.1.5    2 weeks ago
You can go online and see her naked right? If you think she has a dick I hate to break some bad news to you...You have your genitals mixed up.

Tranny's know how to hide it. Apparently Malaria needs some lessons. 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
5.1.7  KDMichigan  replied to  MrFrost @5.1.6    2 weeks ago
Tranny's know how to hide it.

Really? And how do you know this? jrSmiley_26_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
jungkonservativ111
5.1.8  jungkonservativ111  replied to  KDMichigan @5.1.5    2 weeks ago

"You have your genitals mixed up."

Not surprising. The left struggles with the concept of genders. Except when it comes to advocating for women's rights. Then genders suddenly exist and matter.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
5.1.9  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  jungkonservativ111 @5.1.8    2 weeks ago

384

 
 
 
bbl-1
5.1.10  bbl-1  replied to  MrFrost @5.1.4    2 weeks ago

End this crap.  This is stupid, childish and un-American.  If the christo/fascist/right wingers want to go with is crap---then---they are what they are.  Never be them.  Never make Putin smile.

Did not vote you up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
 
 
KDMichigan
5.1.11  KDMichigan  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.1    2 weeks ago
Is that the only dumb ass meme you got besides Mrs. Obama with a penis?

Nope, I have plenty more.

256

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
5.1.12  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  MrFrost @5.1.4    2 weeks ago

512

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
5.2  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  MrFrost @5    2 weeks ago

He surely did. But in the end, He came out approximately $62,000.00 richer after the dust settled in court. She was paid $130K to STHU and she LOST in court to the tune of $192K that she had to pay for her pursuit of BS. 

Oh, and for shits and giggles, how did his lying about boinking Porny Daniels affect you and yours negatively in your daily lives?

 
 
 
KDMichigan
5.2.1  KDMichigan  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @5.2    2 weeks ago

How much did Slick Willy and Hillarious Hillary have to pay to his conquests? 

Paula Jones alone was $850,000.

 
 
 
MrFrost
5.2.2  MrFrost  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @5.2    2 weeks ago
He surely did. But in the end, He came out approximately $62,000.00 richer after the dust settled in court.

So it's about the money, and not that he lied about cheating on his third wife. Got it, keep those moral judgments coming. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
5.2.3  MrFrost  replied to  KDMichigan @5.2.1    2 weeks ago
How much did Slick Willy and Hillarious Hillary have to pay to his conquests? 

Learn to spell. "Hilarious", jesus,

[deleted]

Also... Does this mean you won't be voting for Bill 30+ years ago? I am sure he is upset and won't win that election. 

Bill had 11 accusers, trump, (who is the CURRENT POTUS), has 20 accusers... Trump wins again!!!!!!!!!!!!! WooHoo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
5.2.4  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  MrFrost @5.2.2    2 weeks ago

As far as the " how did his lying about boinking Porny Daniels affect you and yours negatively in your daily lives? " you have nothing. Thought so. Carry on.jrSmiley_30_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_18_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
MrFrost
5.2.5  MrFrost  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @5.2.4    2 weeks ago

As far as the " how did his lying about boinking Porny Daniels affect you and yours negatively in your daily lives? " you have nothing. Thought so. Carry on.

So much for those "Traditional Conservative Christian Values". 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
5.2.6  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  MrFrost @5.2.5    2 weeks ago

So still nothing. It's okay. Carry on.

 
 
 
devangelical
5.2.7  devangelical  replied to  MrFrost @5.2.5    2 weeks ago

those xtian values have a price tag, a really cheap one

 
 
 
MrFrost
5.2.8  MrFrost  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @5.2.6    2 weeks ago

So still nothing. It's okay. Carry on.

Take it up with HA, he has an article right now claiming the right wing has the moral high ground...

"Carry on".. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
5.2.9  MrFrost  replied to  devangelical @5.2.7    2 weeks ago

those xtian values have a price tag, a really cheap one

Very true Dev.. 

 
 
 
jungkonservativ111
5.2.10  jungkonservativ111  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @5.2    2 weeks ago

Whats up Jim? Found your way to another forum I see. I'm just starting to try this site out. How is it?

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
5.2.11  igknorantzrulz  replied to  jungkonservativ111 @5.2.10    2 weeks ago

i can't speak for Jim, but i'd go with a conservative dream

 
 
 
devangelical
5.2.12  devangelical  replied to  jungkonservativ111 @5.2.10    2 weeks ago

liberally biased according to some. try fox or stormfront. buh bye

 
 
 
jungkonservativ111
5.2.13  jungkonservativ111  replied to  devangelical @5.2.12    2 weeks ago

That's fine. I'm only starting here since MSNBC closed their comment section. Doesn't get much more progressive/nutty than that. Must have been too many conservatives posting their opinions in their safe space. Anyways, hopefully the snowflakes here can handle a difference in opinion.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
5.2.14  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  jungkonservativ111 @5.2.13    2 weeks ago

You'll see. The libs/never Trumpers, just like in Maddow/Benen land think the place is theirs.

Good to see you my friend!!

 
 
 
jungkonservativ111
5.2.15  jungkonservativ111  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @5.2.14    2 weeks ago

Can't wait to see how fast that "maddowblog" remains in action without the comment section. If that joke thinks people were reading anything more than the headlines of those "articles", he's dreaming. Wonder how long it will take him to realize he is just blogging to himself now.

Cheers friend! Let's see how long this site can stand us jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
5.2.16  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  jungkonservativ111 @5.2.15    2 weeks ago

Just take heed to the comments here. The mods run a pretty tight ship. You'll see what you can say and what you can't. Hopefully you read the "rules".

jrSmiley_43_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
5.2.17  igknorantzrulz  replied to  jungkonservativ111 @5.2.15    2 weeks ago
Let's see how long this site can stand us

Welcome jungkonservative111

i appreciate your moniker, though you may find, our opinions may differ on occasion, it's still okkasion

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
5.3  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  MrFrost @5    6 days ago

Trump is sure to bring up Obama and Hillary so why shouldn't his opponents bring Stormy up when the mud slinging begins.

 
 
 
Tacos!
6  Tacos!    2 weeks ago

This junk is what turns people off to politicians and parties in Washington. If you're trying to get people excited about voting for you, this is not the way to do it.

 
 
 
bbl-1
7  bbl-1    2 weeks ago

Stephanie Clifford--aka--Stormy Daniels?  Another rehash?

Nothing to rehash.  Trump had a liaison with her while Melania was home with infant child.  Just what it is.

Actually, the Karen McDougal saga and Trump is much more interesting and continued for a much longer period.  Ms. McDougal even apologized.  Not to Trump.  She apologized to herself. 

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online


lib50


25 visitors