Democrats' plan to rehash the Stormy Daniels story will go nowhere, and they know that
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
The Washington Post reported Monday night that Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee “plan to make President Trump’s alleged involvement in a 2016 scheme to silence two women who claimed they had affairs with him major investigative focus this fall." The paper also said that they’re “preparing to hold hearings and call witnesses involved in hush-money payments to ex- Playboy model Karen McDougal and adult-film star Stormy Daniels as soon as October…”
The news must have given your sagging post-Labor Day spirit just the boost it needed.
This is what Democrats do nowadays. They put all their faith in the chase of some empty wish, and when it turns up empty, they whine that something went wrong.
After special counsel Robert Mueller wrapped up his exhaustive Russia probe without finding any proof of collusion with Russia, Democrats whined that Robert Mueller’s hands were tied.
After extensive reporting on Trump’s personal tax information by both the New York Times and Rachel Maddow revealed old and innocuous returns, Democrats demanded six additional years of Trump’s private tax returns.
And now, more than a month after prosecutors ended their investigation of a weak campaign finance allegation against the Trump campaign — it resulted only in a laughable guilty plea from Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen for something that wasn't even illegal — Democrats think holding a bunch of hearings can further fan their impeachment dreams that, to date, have never gone anywhere.
----------------------------------------
But they have another ghost to chase.
Tags
Who is online
589 visitors
Liberals still "Baying at the Moon" to this day.
bay at the moon
To make appeals in vain.
The barking of dogs at a full moon has been a metaphor for futile activity since the mid 17th century.
This sums up what all the left has. No plans, just screaming in the wind...
If they can keep the bitching sailing in the winds until 2020, that's all they want. They don't care about "Impeaching Trump". It just "Sounds" good to their voters.
That's all the 'right' has. No plans. Just this 'president' ranting and raging between twitter on the shitter rants.
Besides "Hearings", what is the Democrats plan for the country anyway ?
The oversight committee is doing their job by investigating this scumbag 'president'
Correct ….. Just "Baying at the Moon" !
Hillarious.
If you haven't figured out what's going on in politics right now with what President Trump is doing I don't understand why you are even here unless it's just to troll?
By George I think you've got it!!
i thought Stormy would of been more attractive than that , but, isn't this like
I'm waiting for someone to let us know what this 'president' is doing other than looting the treasury as fat as his fat little fingers will allow.
How so? Please be specific. Thanks in advance.
Youll have to wait a verrrrryyyyyy long time to get an answer to that question.
Two people have posted what he is doing and here you are still wondering...
Is this this the only thing you are familiar with?
That's all the turd 'president' is doing.
**Crickets**
Eliminate cars, planes, and cows. Turn the middle class into working poor with a ridiculous tax hike.
Democrats just need "Lemmings" !
I haven't heard anything at all about Stormy Daniels for several months... That is, until you brought it up.
Apparently, the "News" is bored with antics like this too !
A party out of ideas resorts to this.
may b u oughta sharpen your sharpie, cause the GOP is in no way the sharpest HOES in the shed full of TOOLZ
Yet …… Things have been-a-happenin' (Accomplished). Even "Dull" still can eliminate weeds.
try a weedwacker
Stick with what "Works".
What ideas do the cons have?
You don't know what Trump and the Republicans have already accomplished since 2017 ?
You don't know what the Democrats want to Accomplish besides Hearings ?
You'd think someone that Hates Trump and the Republicans so much, would at least know what their own party was going to do and change for the betterment of the country !
I know what they've accomplished, the cons, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING !
hmmmmmmm ……
If one cares to read
, here's great list:
The List Of President Trump's Accomplishments So Far"
Now, What do the Democrats "Want" to accomplish again ?
Is more Hearings still all they have ?
Your 'great list' includes ONE piece of original legislation, the tax cut that added over a TRILLION to the deficit.
Since your article it criticizing the Democrats in Congress, exactly HOW does your list prove that the GOP Congress has accomplished anything other than add to the deficit?
In this session, the House has passed 35 bills, only 9 of which became law and 7 of those are PO designations. The rest sit on McConnell's desk.
BTFW, ALL of the bills that became law this session originated in the Democratic run house.
As for the Senate, 12 bills passed, 6 filed by Democrats, 2 of which became law.
So only 6 bills filed by the GOP Congress that they could get through their own house and none have become law.
What was it you were saying about the Democratic Congress again?
Tax cuts don't add to the deficit. Spending does. Like any other business that doesn't want to go broke, one adjusts based on what's coming in. Government doesn't do that.
"What was it you were saying about the Democratic Congress again?"
I "Said" nothing. I asked a "Question" !
You know the difference right ?
Deficits only matter when a Democrat is President.
And just HOW is the US suffering because those bills are sitting?
**Clue - it isn't**
when i 'ask' a "Question",
i feel like i've "Said" SOMETHING
Feelings, Nothing more than Feelings …….
Say;
a. To state as an opinion or judgment; declare: I say let's eat out.
b. To state as a determination of fact:
Past tense; Said
Utter bullshit.
You 'Said' plenty but I agree with your assessment of it's value.
You got an answer and it doesn't look that you like it much.
"You got an answer and it doesn't look that you like it much."
Look harder. I said not one thing, one way or another, about your "List" !
You just like to make stuff up, dontchya !
Because some of them deal with cyber security to protect our election process, (all of which Moscow Mitch has refused to even vote on).
So you don't think that FY 2020 Appropriations bills sitting ignored on McConnell's desk is an issue? Perhaps you should review the 'suffering' in the US the last time the Senate failed to pass appropriations on a timely basis...
BTW, the Trump Administration was so desperate to try to hide that suffering, Trump had his Interior Dept. violate federal law.
BTW, 21 of those are 'Armed services and National Security' bills, 27 are DHS bills.
Ya, no worries Just...
I see you and Mr. Frost BOTH missed the point. I asked, "And just HOW is the US suffering because those bills are sitting". Now, both have answered (IYUO) that it is POSSBILY things IN THE FUTURE. NOT what it is doing now. So again, please answer the question or just run. Your choice of course.
One of the two bills originating in the House that passed the Senate was Sponsored/filed by a GOP Congressman.
FAIL!
I didn't mention Nancy. Strawman.
First of all, as I said, 6 of those 12 had Democratic sponsors.
Secondly, if the dems are 'blocking everything' then NONE of those bills should have passed.
Your comment doesn't make any sense, though yours rarely do.
Well that just proves just how ignorant you are of the process in the Congress. I'm not inclined to waste my time trying to bring you up to speed.
So you speak for non-partisan hacks. Got ya.
So the Senate has passed bills yet you insist that the Dems block everything.
What deflections?
One would have to be willfully obtuse to keep repeating the same obviously false statement.
Why?
Do you hold the opinion of hacks in such high regard?
Oh please DO tell me all about your vast knowledge of the merits of those bills that have passed the House dennis.
Your comment has no value, as usual.
I'm not going to overload It Is Me seed with what the "cons" have accomplished.
Maybe you might find this helpful...
Just let me know if you need anymore helpful references, I'm more than willing to help.
Oops, sorry, hadn't scrolled down yet. Just saw your list after I put the one I had up.
Doesn't matter you could post it 5 times and people would still claim ignorance.
It doesn't hurt to keep trying.
What has this 'president' accomplished that benefits anyone other than himself and his rich cronies?
You've never helped and never will.
What did I tell ya.
So, that explains you being here 24/7 bitching about all your resentments...
With all your businesses and living the high life how do you find the time?
The business(es) that he inherited from his wife's family.
You'll have to read the list and decide that on your own (although I already know what your answer will be).
I'm doing much better than I did from 2009 to 2016, and I'm not a Cronies, nor am I the President of the United States !
Yet the prediction didn't come to pass. 2.9 for 2018. HOW is that a Trump 'accomplishment'?
Your list is pathetic. EO's aren't accomplishments. Do you count the innumerable 'proposed' infrastructure plans that have gone nowhere? How is the USDA doing what they've done in other administrations a Trump accomplishment? Sheesh, do you want to give Trump credit for the Earth spinning?
They're not ?
"Executive orders are issued under specific statutory authority from Congress and have the force and effect of law. Federal courts consider such orders to be the equivalent of federal statutes. In addition, regulations that are enacted to carry out these executive orders have the status of law . "
Sadly there is no help for those who refuse to help themselves.
Out of a list of 289 you found one that was off by .1 % in your opinion.
Way to go Dulay you are so freaking awesome.
Hey everyone we need to give post 3.2.13 a "like" as appreciation for Dulay's great accomplishment.
I know right, that's your problem that it makes no sense, I can't help you.
Your comments are the ones that don't make sense and you're correct, you cannot help me, never have, never will.
No, they're not !
Given to you/inherited from your wifes' family.
He said he bought it from them. It is not uncommon that family businesses are sold to other family members.
No, they're not. EO's don't require anything more than a pen, or in Trump's case, a sharpie.
Remember when y'all thought EO's were a 'bad thing'? Now they're 'accomplishments'. Sheesh talk about hypocrisy.
People work hard to leave something for their families.
Why do you have a problem with it?
That isn't my opinion, that's the Trump Administration's data.
BTFW, did you miss the fact that I mentioned other points?
You're not
Since you're the guy who thinks that Trump should get credit for other's accomplishments, shouldn't YOU be getting 'my' likes?
I think it's that little thing called jealousy. It's a awful burden.
Excuse me, but I take offense of your use of gender specific pronouns.
In future correspondents to me plz use gender neutral pronouns.
Thank you.
No worries.
Since you're the it who thinks that Trump should get credit for other's accomplishments, shouldn't YOU be getting 'my' likes?
What's a it? Is that how you refer to yourself? As usual you make no sense with your babbling.
Tell you what, I'll let you research general neutral pronouns and you can get back with me okay ….Comrade.
Nah, I work for a living.
[deleted]
I work at a University Hospital for the School of Medicine. I work with 3rd & 4th year Medical students. I don't judge people either for where they work or what they do for a living.
Peace.
I'm asking for a truce and hope you accept.
I promise to lay off the smart ass comments about you and your business.
only boats?
removed for context
babble /? let's see
i'd go with not a he or she, so you are left with
'it' .
i see myself as anti noun, as pro nouns are either uncles, or too
difficult to
pro-nounciate at least 4 me
Maybe this will help Comrade.
I've often not read about them, usually only in a vehicle in a park, or with the Ebrake on, while i take one, as when in mode neutral, vessel can roll a way not meant for he, she, or they
Interesting link though, i guess, but
i b leave you knead knot be inn the library, a tempting to locate a catalog, filled with cards, while the sexy glasses wearing librarian says to ya SSSSSSHHHHHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
IT,
u sure r cute, cause that sexy librarian is a MANLY wOMAN or a GIRLY mAN,
staring down their snoot, at yute(joe Pesci style)
leavin you eatin crow out of apple American Pie ,
as you R band from band camp, cause you lost your Flute,
so
b 4 u go tootin your neutral gender phender bender vehicle's horn, parked in a park driving in reverse while attempting to teach the fine coarse and you get bought for seeking buyers remorse
,
Ken you not see why Democrats have not a choice,
when it comes to the good old boys of the Grand Old Party
being surprised
about a party,
making the exact same damn choice, they would have made a year or two ago...
oh
idaho don't know, but hoes, in my book, are gender neutral...
unless of course in a park in the dark
cause this changes everything ! no S/ arc
It is a perfectly serviceable gender neutral pronoun. Isn't that how you insisted on being referred to?
I don't need to research simple English. If you have another pronoun you want to be referred as, fucking spit it out and be done with it.
BTFW, guy isn't a pronoun.
Where's the one for 'guy'?
Is "It" how you would refer to yourself?
Because "Since you're the it " is not proper for gender neutral pronouns.
No problem. Call me Comrade.
No, I'm not the one that needs to be called a gender neutral pronoun, YOU ARE.
Sure it is...
Comrade is not a pronoun and it isn't on your 'proper' gender neutral pronoun list. It doesn't look like you know want you want.
Who says I'm a guy, Comrade?
My one nephew was going to be a physician's assistant but has decided to go to Medical School and become a doctor as well. It would really be something if he came to this/my school. I would love it!
I'm so proud of him. You must be so proud as well.
He is also half black, half white.
His dad is black.
Quite handsome as well.
Truce?
Peace?
You're not answering my question so I won't be answering yours.
I'm not your Comrade, use my proper name.
apparently i am as well
but,
whatever.
Don't you feel the comradery, we share being labeled the same ?
Me neither, but i'm not Russian to judgement, either.
Oh and BTW, based on your prior posts, either you're a guy or you're a lesbian. Pick one.
That's too bad! I hope he's doing well now. All the best to your fine young man, men.
both you and MUVA have things to be proud of and do valuable work
I'll think I'll pick being a lesbian, then I can justify having a self righteous attitude.
Your wife will have new expectations.
I doubt it.
Looks like you missed the predicate of my comment BF.
I doubt that Dulay, anyone can be a carpet muncher, she likes the D.
And another thing keep my family out of your mouth.
Thanks Charger!
So ….. Actual new "Law" means nothing. Got it !
"Remember when y'all thought EO's were a 'bad thing'? Now they're 'accomplishments'. Sheesh talk about hypocrisy."
i don't remember saying anything of the sort !
See ....... you really DO just make stuff up !
Quick.....
What's an EO ?
So you ARE a guy. So now, what did you choose as a gender neutral pronoun?
I thought you said 'she likes the D'.
What 'new 'Law' are you bloviating about?
I didn't say you said anything.
Something you know nothing about, fake ones don't count, just ask your wife.
You're so right! I know nothing about liking D.
I just did. She said she had not use for fake D but since millions have been sold, someone must.
Still waiting for you to cite those 'new laws' It.
Read Trumps E.O.'s, including Obama's.
That should help you.....maybe !
You still don't know what an E.O. is or does ?
"I didn't say you said anything."
YOUR "y'all" says other wise.
Maybe you should "think" , before you type ?
Stumped ?
I'm not the one that needs help, you are.
Your deflection merely proves that you pulled the 'new 'Laws' comment from your nether regions. You asked another member to tell you what an EO is yet it's pretty fucking obvious that you don't know that answer yourself.
EO's don't create 'new 'Laws'. An EO has NO AUTHORITY, in and of itself.
PERIOD full stop.
It would behoove you to follow your own advice, READ Trump's EO's and maybe you'll recognize that EVERY ONE OF THEM cites a specific provision of the Constitution, a statute or a treaty as a basis for it's authority.
Hell, you could just read the fucking source of the quote you posted [without citation] to educate yourself on EO's.
Or, as expected, you could just keep spewing unfounded bullshit and keep hammering home all lack of credibility.
Yes you are, as usual.
Nope, that's you It.
As much as you like to pretend, you haven't a fucking clue what you're talking about.
Oh how original! Did you think of that one all by yourself?
Ya....sure.
"The U.S. Constitution gives the American President authority to create laws, or decide how an existing law should be carried out, through the use of executive orders. Because executive orders do not require congressional approval, the President can set important policy while sidestepping public debate. Executive orders may be used for a broad range of issues, from environmental conservation and protection, to prohibiting discrimination, and sending troops to other countries."
Cry me a river (go on and just)
Cry me a river (go on and just)
Cry me a river (baby, go on and just)
Cry me a river
Oh yeah ?
bet me !
So she likes the real sausage too? Understandable.
I am betting that they got a fair amount of the work ethic concept from you both.
So an EO has NO AUTHORITIY in and of itself.
I note that you cited a different source than the one you quoted from initially. Why?
Didn't you like what the first sentence in that article:
Executive Order: A presidential policy directive that implements or interprets a federal statute, a constitutional provision, or a treaty.
I prefer the original.
I can tell !
It does !
"Didn't you like what the first sentence in that article:"
"Executive Order: A presidential policy directive that implements or interprets a federal statute, a constitutional provision, or a treaty."
And becomes "LAW" when signed.
An Accomplishment for sure !
Prove it. Cite a Trump EO that created a 'new law'. I'll wait...
H.R.2228 : Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Act of 2017
What It Will Do: This " law" instructs …..
That wasn't hard !
You need a better Schtick !
An act of Congress is NOT an EO. What a SAD failed attempt at deflection from the fact that you can't support the bullshit you post.
Why? You've proven that you're clueless about WTF you're talking about.
You asked....You Received ….. You didn't like it !
I asked, you posted bullshit.
Only in YOUR mind ….. Only in YOUR Mind?
Your tax dollars hard at work folks.
But donny said that the "Stormy Daniels thing" was all fake news?
Oh wait.. he lied about that too.
Is that the only dumb ass meme you got besides Mrs. Obama with a penis?
Wow, the same old meme, I am guessing that you think stormy daniels has NOTHING to do with trump, right?
More proof the left can't meme.
I thought she was a porn star.
You can go online and see her naked right? If you think she has a dick I hate to break some bad news to you...You have your genitals mixed up.
Maybe this will help clear things up for you....
Tranny's know how to hide it. Apparently Malaria needs some lessons.
Really? And how do you know this?
"You have your genitals mixed up."
Not surprising. The left struggles with the concept of genders. Except when it comes to advocating for women's rights. Then genders suddenly exist and matter.
End this crap. This is stupid, childish and un-American. If the christo/fascist/right wingers want to go with is crap---then---they are what they are. Never be them. Never make Putin smile.
Did not vote you up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nope, I have plenty more.
He surely did. But in the end, He came out approximately $62,000.00 richer after the dust settled in court. She was paid $130K to STHU and she LOST in court to the tune of $192K that she had to pay for her pursuit of BS.
Oh, and for shits and giggles, how did his lying about boinking Porny Daniels affect you and yours negatively in your daily lives?
How much did Slick Willy and Hillarious Hillary have to pay to his conquests?
Paula Jones alone was $850,000.
So it's about the money, and not that he lied about cheating on his third wife. Got it, keep those moral judgments coming.
Learn to spell. "Hilarious", jesus,
[deleted]
Also... Does this mean you won't be voting for Bill 30+ years ago? I am sure he is upset and won't win that election.
Bill had 11 accusers, trump, (who is the CURRENT POTUS), has 20 accusers... Trump wins again!!!!!!!!!!!!! WooHoo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL
As far as the " how did his lying about boinking Porny Daniels affect you and yours negatively in your daily lives? " you have nothing. Thought so. Carry on.
So much for those "Traditional Conservative Christian Values".
So still nothing. It's okay. Carry on.
those xtian values have a price tag, a really cheap one
Take it up with HA, he has an article right now claiming the right wing has the moral high ground...
"Carry on"..
Very true Dev..
Whats up Jim? Found your way to another forum I see. I'm just starting to try this site out. How is it?
i can't speak for Jim, but i'd go with a conservative dream
liberally biased according to some. try fox or stormfront. buh bye
That's fine. I'm only starting here since MSNBC closed their comment section. Doesn't get much more progressive/nutty than that. Must have been too many conservatives posting their opinions in their safe space. Anyways, hopefully the snowflakes here can handle a difference in opinion.
You'll see. The libs/never Trumpers, just like in Maddow/Benen land think the place is theirs.
Good to see you my friend!!
Can't wait to see how fast that "maddowblog" remains in action without the comment section. If that joke thinks people were reading anything more than the headlines of those "articles", he's dreaming. Wonder how long it will take him to realize he is just blogging to himself now.
Cheers friend! Let's see how long this site can stand us
Just take heed to the comments here. The mods run a pretty tight ship. You'll see what you can say and what you can't. Hopefully you read the "rules".
Welcome jungkonservative111
i appreciate your moniker, though you may find, our opinions may differ on occasion, it's still okkasion
Trump is sure to bring up Obama and Hillary so why shouldn't his opponents bring Stormy up when the mud slinging begins.
This junk is what turns people off to politicians and parties in Washington. If you're trying to get people excited about voting for you, this is not the way to do it.
Stephanie Clifford--aka--Stormy Daniels? Another rehash?
Nothing to rehash. Trump had a liaison with her while Melania was home with infant child. Just what it is.
Actually, the Karen McDougal saga and Trump is much more interesting and continued for a much longer period. Ms. McDougal even apologized. Not to Trump. She apologized to herself.