Trump Appeals To Hispanic Voters During New Mexico Rally: ‘We Love Our Hispanics’

  
Via:  tessylo  •  one month ago  •  149 comments

Trump Appeals To Hispanic Voters During New Mexico Rally: ‘We Love Our Hispanics’

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Politics








Trump Appeals To Hispanic Voters During New Mexico Rally: ‘We Love Our Hispanics’



710c91c0-4b9c-11e7-8912-374be9390b1b_H-1   Dominique Mosbergen, HuffPost   7 hours ago  






5d808a99240000d3267bf5de.jpg

President Donald Trump, whose  hardline approach to immigration  has been a cornerstone of his presidency, made a fervent appeal to Hispanic voters during a campaign rally in New Mexico on Monday.

“We love our Hispanics,” he declared.

“Yesterday marked the beginning of Hispanic Heritage Month. Who is Hispanic here?” Trump asked the crowd during his wide-ranging address, prompting cheers and applause. Several people in the audience waved “Latinos for Trump” placards and donned T-shirts with the same message.

“Thank you ― incredible people,” Trump said of his Latino supporters. 


Trump touted the low employment rate and  rising median income  among Hispanic Americans and said his administration was “working night and day to deliver a future of limitless opportunity for our nation’s Hispanic American citizens, including many extraordinary Mexican Americans.”

Trump also claimed Hispanic Americans were big fans of his tough immigration policies, including his border wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. 

“The Hispanic Americans understand they don’t want criminals going across the border, they don’t want people taking their jobs, they want to have that security and they want the wall,” Trump said. “They want the wall.”

In one viral moment, the president singled out one of his supporters ― Steve Cortes, a political commentator on CNN,  who was at the event .

“He happens to be Hispanic but I’ve never quite figured it out because he looks more like a WASP than I do,” Trump said of Cortes, using the abbreviation for a “white Anglo-Saxon Protestant.”

The president then asked Cortes: “Who do you like more ― the country or the Hispanics?”

“He says the country,” Trump continued. “I don’t know, I may have to go for the Hispanics, to be honest. We got a lot of Hispanics. We love our Hispanics! Get out and vote.”


Recent polls show that Trump — who has drawn scrutiny in the past for his racist rhetoric  against Mexicans   and Latin Americans  more broadly — is faring poorly when it comes to Hispanic voters.


Washington Post-ABC News poll  last week found that only 25% of Hispanics approve of the job Trump is doing as president ― considerably lower than his overall approval rating of 38%. A  CNN/SSRS poll , also conducted last week, showed Trump’s approval rating among Hispanic adults to be  29% .

Hispanic Americans are the  largest minority in the United States  — and  New Mexico , which is almost half Hispanic, has the largest Hispanic population by percentage of any state.

Trump said during Monday’s rally that he was confident he could drum up enough support to “win the great state of New Mexico.” 

He acknowledged, however, that “it’s been quite a while since a Republican won this state.”

New Mexico has voted for a Republican president only once since 1992. George W. Bush narrowly bested Democrat John Kerry in the state during the 2004 presidential race; Bush beat Kerry by   less than 6,000 votes.

In 2016, Trump was defeated in New Mexico by Hillary Clinton 40% to 48%; and, according to Democrats in the state, the president will have little chance of changing his fortunes in 2020. 

“New Mexicans certainly don’t approve of pulling families apart or putting kids in cages,” New Mexico Democratic Party Chairwoman Marg Elliston  told The Washington Post  this week. “We’re ready for leadership that celebrates our immigrant communities, not demonizes them.”









Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
Find text within the comments Find 
 
Tessylo
1  seeder  Tessylo    one month ago

In 2016, Trump was defeated in New Mexico by Hillary Clinton 40% to 48%; and, according to Democrats in the state, the president will have little chance of changing his fortunes in 2020. 

“New Mexicans certainly don’t approve of pulling families apart or putting kids in cages,” New Mexico Democratic Party Chairwoman Marg Elliston    told The Washington Post    this week. “We’re ready for leadership that celebrates our immigrant communities, not demonizes them.”

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1  gooseisgone  replied to  Tessylo @1    one month ago
little chance of changing his fortunes in 2020. 

OK........no need for an election Tump wins because there is little chance of changing from 2016.

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.1  Dulay  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1    one month ago
OK........no need for an election Tump wins because there is little chance of changing from 2016.

Your need to truncate her comment to 'make your point' is intellectually dishonest. 

 
 
 
Heartland American
1.1.2  Heartland American  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1    one month ago

I watched that rally and it was great. It was also great to hear thousands of Hispanic Americans chanting Build that wall in unison.  

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.3  Dulay  replied to  Heartland American @1.1.2    one month ago

Hispanics would have chanted 'Construye ese muro'.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
1.1.4  1stwarrior  replied to  Dulay @1.1.3    one month ago

In New Mexico, most of them speak English.

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.5  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @1.1.4    one month ago

Trump said he loves Hispanics, Hispanics speak Spanish. I guess he forgot that Puerto Ricans are Hispanics. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
1.1.6  1stwarrior  replied to  Dulay @1.1.5    one month ago

Really interesting response Dulay, 'specially since the rally was in New Mexico, the protesting was in New Mexico and the vast majority of Hispanics in New Mexico speak very good English.

Just can't figure out the tie to Puerto Rico though - care to elaborate?

 
 
 
XDm9mm
1.2  XDm9mm  replied to  Tessylo @1    one month ago
the president will have little chance of changing his fortunes in 2020. 

Thanks for acknowledging that President Trump will win yet again and retain the Presidency until he leaves office in January 2025. 

 
 
 
Dulay
1.2.1  Dulay  replied to  XDm9mm @1.2    one month ago

Your need to truncate her comment to 'make your point' is intellectually dishonest.

 
 
 
WallyW
1.3  WallyW  replied to  Tessylo @1    one month ago
We’re ready for leadership that celebrates our immigrant communities, not demonizes them.”

Only fools would  "celebrate" a  flood of mostly uneducated and unskilled people coming here for handouts and welfare from American citizens

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.3.1  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  WallyW @1.3    one month ago

What handouts and welfare?

 
 
 
MUVA
1.3.2  MUVA  replied to  Tessylo @1.3.1    one month ago

You can’t have hand outs and welfare with a open borders it makes no sense

 
 
 
Sparty On
1.3.3  Sparty On  replied to  MUVA @1.3.2    one month ago

One has to have sense to make sense of that ......

 
 
 
MUVA
1.3.4  MUVA  replied to  Sparty On @1.3.3    one month ago

I can correct my post and can’t see my phone I can only hope what I’m posting make sense it probably doesnt

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.3.5  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  MUVA @1.3.2    one month ago

What open borders?

 
 
 
MUVA
1.3.6  MUVA  replied to  Tessylo @1.3.5    one month ago

You know the border where over 300,000 people come here illegally every year that one.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
1.3.7  1stwarrior  replied to  Tessylo @1.3.5    one month ago

Seriously????  I mean, are you SERIOUSLY asking such a question?????

 
 
 
1stwarrior
1.3.8  1stwarrior  replied to  MUVA @1.3.6    one month ago

2018, the number was 980,000 - thus far this year, the number is 900,000 - yeah - that border.

 
 
 
Krishna
1.3.9  Krishna  replied to  WallyW @1.3    one month ago
Only fools would  "celebrate" a  flood of mostly uneducated and unskilled people coming here for handouts and welfare from American citizens

And yet-- Trump loves them:

We Love Our Hispanics!

Whaddya think Wally-- is trump not a truly Christ-like figure?

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.3.10  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  1stwarrior @1.3.7    one month ago

What open borders?

 
 
 
MUVA
1.3.11  MUVA  replied to  Tessylo @1.3.10    one month ago

When someone answers your question in written forum you can just read the answer again if you have the same question.

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.3.12  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  MUVA @1.3.11    one month ago

What open borders?

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
1.3.13  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  1stwarrior @1.3.8    one month ago

I didn't find anywhere that number.  Source please.

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.3.14  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @1.3.13    one month ago

Of course not.  And IF he provides a source it won't say what he claims it does.  

 
 
 
1stwarrior
1.3.15  1stwarrior  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @1.3.13    one month ago

https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44319094

https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/from-the-border-more-frustrating-immigration-numbers-for-president-trump/2019/05/08/ad6ac140-71a7-11e9-9eb4-0828f5389013_story.html

https://psmag.com/news/increasing-border-arrests-is-the-us-facing-an-illegal-immigration-crisis

When it comes to people in the country without proper documentation, the majority of them didn't cross the Mexican border at all. Most of them came to the United States legally — but then don't leave.

About 700,000 travelers to the United States overstayed their visas in fiscal 2017, the most recent year for which the Department of Homeland Security has   published figures . DHS estimated that,   as of Sept. 30, 2017, the end of that fiscal year, more than 600,000 of those travelers were still in the U.S.

https://www.npr.org/2019/01/10/683662691/where-does-illegal-immigration-mostly-occur-heres-what-the-data-tell-us

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/05/us/border-crossing-increase.html

https://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/yes-there-crisis-the-border

 
 
 
Dulay
1.3.16  Dulay  replied to  WallyW @1.3    one month ago
Only fools would  "celebrate" a  flood of mostly uneducated and unskilled people coming here for handouts and welfare from American citizens

Only fools would believe that there is a 'flood of mostly uneducated and unskilled people' that qualify for federal benefits. 

 
 
 
Dulay
1.3.17  Dulay  replied to  MUVA @1.3.2    one month ago
You can’t have hand outs and welfare with a open borders it makes no sense

Please provide a list of these alleged hand outs and welfare that those that cross the border qualify for. 

 
 
 
 
Tessylo
1.3.19  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  gooseisgone @1.3.18    one month ago

Conservative review?

No thanks. 

 
 
 
Dulay
1.3.20  Dulay  replied to  gooseisgone @1.3.18    one month ago

From you link:

while illegal immigrant households primarily benefit from food programs and Medicaid through their U.S.-born children

Thanks for clearing that up. 

 
 
 
Dulay
1.3.21  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @1.3.15    one month ago

So according to your own link your numbers are false. 

https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration

Last year, 521,090, so far this year, 811,016; over half of which were families with children. 

BTFW, I 'apprehended' my kitten when it jumped into my lap today. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
1.3.22  Split Personality  replied to  1stwarrior @1.3.15    one month ago

Some of these links don't support your position.

Did you read them or just shop for headlines that sounded good?

One clearly points out that almost 2/3s of all "illegals" every year are over stays that entered the country legally.

THAT sounds like a good place to concentrate ICE efforts, doesn't it?

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.3.23  gooseisgone  replied to  Dulay @1.3.20    one month ago
Table 3 shows that childless illegal households still use some welfare programs at surprisingly high rates, such as 8.7 percent for food stamps and 16.9 percent for Medicaid

Does this clear it up for you as well.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
1.3.24  1stwarrior  replied to  Split Personality @1.3.22    one month ago

And, did you know that those who overstay their visas are also Illegal Aliens?

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.3.25  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Split Personality @1.3.22    one month ago
'Did you read them or just shop for headlines that sounded good?'

I would say it's the latter.  

 
 
 
Split Personality
1.3.26  Split Personality  replied to  1stwarrior @1.3.24    4 weeks ago

Yes 1W,  did you not read my entire remark?

Here, from your NPR link.  It clearly states that overstays are illegal, undocumented immigrants which typically outnumber border apprehensions by as much as 600,000 per year.

Visa overstays have outnumbered people who enter the country illegally at the Southern border every year since 2007, according to a report by the Center for Migration Studies . The report's authors estimate that the number of total visa overstays was 600,000 more than the total number of border crossers and that in 2014, visa overstays accounted for two-thirds of all new undocumented immigrants. https://www.npr.org/2019/01/10/683662691/where-does-illegal-immigration-mostly-occur-heres-what-the-data-tell-us

I do wish you could recognize agreement when it happens.  Sheesh.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
2  Dismayed Patriot    one month ago

“Look at my Latino-American over here. Look at him! Are you the greatest?”...

Just curious, but how many Latino's are in that picture above? It's like a "Where's Waldo" fun puzzle...

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.1  XDm9mm  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2    one month ago
Just curious, but how many Latino's are in that picture above? It's like a "Where's Waldo" fun puzzle...

Actually, having watched the event on TV myself, I was wondering if there were any white people other than the four women I saw immediately behind him.  Everyone else immediately behind him were all Latinos.  Further, more often than not, when the cameras panned the arena, the vast majority of people appeared to be Latino.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
2.1.1  Ozzwald  replied to  XDm9mm @2.1    one month ago
Everyone else immediately behind him were all Latinos.

Of course they were, his rallies are staged, the people the camera sees are placed there for that exact reason.

Several People Behind Trump Were Removed, Replaced During Rally In Montana

 
 
 
Sparty On
2.2  Sparty On  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2    one month ago

What's a "Latino" look like?

I just want to know for future reference.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
2.2.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Sparty On @2.2    one month ago
What's a "Latino" look like?

According to Trump his one Latino friend "Look's more like a WASP" than he does. Perhaps he should ask his other good buddy Sherriff Joe Arpaio who, until 2011, when a Federal District Court injunction forced him to stop, maintained an anti-immigrant "squad" which illegally stopped cars with Latino drivers or passengers to check their immigration status. Who would Trumps friend Joe have stopped in the picture above?

 
 
 
Sparty On
2.2.2  Sparty On  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.2.1    one month ago

I wasn't asking Trump or Sheriff Joe.   I was asking you.   You made the comment.

So do tell, what do Latino's look like?

I suppose you think you get a pass when making racially charged comments like that eh?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
2.2.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.2    one month ago
I was asking you.   You made the comment.

I'm afraid the facts show that I was the one asking "how many Latino's are in that picture above?". I made no comment on what anyone "looked like" in that photo, you did. I merely asked how many are pictured above because I can't tell, can you? Trump seemed to look out and be able to spot them, or even your fellow commenter saying "Everyone else immediately behind him were all Latinos". So perhaps you should ask yourself why my question touched such a nerve and why so many Republicans like Trump and Joe Arpaio support racial profiling and apparently have no problem picking Latino Americans out of a crowd.

“I think profiling is something that we’re going to have to start thinking about as a country,” Trump told CBS’ “Face the Nation.”. “You look at Israel and you look at others, and they do it and they do it successfully. And you know, I hate the concept of profiling, but we have to start using common sense,”.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-idUSKCN0Z50PV

 
 
 
Sparty On
2.2.4  Sparty On  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.2.3    one month ago

Spin baby spin ..... your comment clearly alluded that there was few if any Latino's no matter how hard you try to spin it away.   It was your judgement.   Not Trumps or Joe's.   So you were styling and profiling.   No doubt about it.

You're busted but no one here expects you to admit it.    Some liberals here appear to think they are never wrong ...... ever!

 
 
 
Tessylo
2.2.5  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.4    one month ago

Stop being so butthurt and move along sparky.  

 
 
 
Sparty On
2.2.6  Sparty On  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.5    one month ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
2.2.7  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.6    one month ago

removed for context

 
 
 
Sparty On
2.2.8  Sparty On  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.7    one month ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
2.2.9  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.8    one month ago

removed for context

 
 
 
1stwarrior
2.3  1stwarrior  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2    one month ago

All of them, including the "blonde" woman with the wide open mouth - see the black hair roots?

 
 
 
Krishna
2.4  Krishna  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2    one month ago

Just curious, but how many Latino's are in that picture above? It's like a "Where's Waldo" fun puzzle...

But Trump loves Hispanics...as long as they "stay in their place":

320

 
 
 
1stwarrior
2.4.1  1stwarrior  replied to  Krishna @2.4    one month ago

Ahhhh - another falsely proposed picture - jjjjjeeeeeezzzzzz.

 
 
 
 
Dulay
2.4.3  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @2.4.1    one month ago

Is the Getty Images copyright on that photo fake too 1st? 


© US Customs and Border Protection/via AFP/Getty Images, FILE 
Inside the Central Processing Center in McAllen, Texas on May 23, 2018. 
Source: https://pressfrom.info/us/news/us/-279931-feds-stop-processing-migrants-at-texas-border-center-after-suspected-flu-outbreak.html

 
 
 
1stwarrior
2.4.4  1stwarrior  replied to  Dulay @2.4.3    one month ago

Never said, as you well know, that the photos were fake - just the fake outrage.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.4.5  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @2.4.4    one month ago

 Bullshit 1st. Your comment was about the 'picture', NOT the premise. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
2.4.6  1stwarrior  replied to  Dulay @2.4.5    one month ago

And, of course you know, a picture speaks a thousand words that don't have to be spoken.  Pic is a fake representation.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.4.8  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @2.4.6    one month ago

Especially if Trump is in it. 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
2.5  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2    one month ago

Amazing that you can actually tell from a photo who is Latino and who is not? And just what is a Latino supposed to look like in your opinion?

 
 
 
Tessylo
2.5.1  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @2.5    one month ago

Been there done that Ed.  Move along now.  

 
 
 
1stwarrior
2.5.2  1stwarrior  replied to  Tessylo @2.5.1    one month ago

Nice answer - [Deleted]

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
2.5.3  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  1stwarrior @2.5.2    one month ago

Not a snowball's chance in Hades as long as it comes to Trump.

 
 
 
gooseisgone
2.6  gooseisgone  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2    one month ago

Maybe they "IDENTIFY" as Latino Americans, I m sure you're ok with that.

 
 
 
Tessylo
3  seeder  Tessylo    one month ago

70740508_10220562813207115_1279856608750

 
 
 
Tessylo
4  seeder  Tessylo    one month ago

U.S.

Trump boasts about wealth and makes series of false claims in hate-filled rally speech disrupted by flies and protesters

102b4830-25c0-11e7-a66a-23957430fe89_lat   Zamira Rahim, The Independent   7 hours ago  
Donald Trump  was twice interrupted by protesters at a rally during which he criticised his opponents, discussed his plans to build a border wall and reiterated his support for  Brett Kavanaugh , the Supreme Court justice who has been accused of sexual harassment.

The president went on to describe  Brett Kavanaugh  as a “great talent, a great brilliant man.”

The 73-year-old has not said why he believes the judge is innocent. Fresh accusations about Mr Kavanaugh’s conduct while a student at Yale University emerged only last week.

Mr Trump then used the rally to attack   The New York Times , also known as the Grey Lady, which published the allegations.

“They’ve taken the Old Grey Lady and broken her down, destroyed her virtue and ruined her reputation,” Mr Trump said.

“She can never recover and will never return to greatness under current management.”

The president was heckled twice during the speech. The first interruption came shortly after the rally began.

50944a2ef43cfb77f3543b27e920ec3b

Mr Trump’s supporters booed the protester and the president used the disruption to attack the media.

“Good night to that person,” he said as the protester was escorted out. “Tomorrow [the media] will say ‘massive protests!’

“One person just going home to Mommy a little bit sooner.”

During his speech the president also claimed human traffickers were bringing women across the southern border and that his wall would stop them.

“They traffic, really, for the most part – in women. They capture women and they bring them across the open borders,” he said.

“And they don’t go through ports of entry.”

However, nearly 80 per cent of trafficking victims cross into countries through legal ports of entry, according to the  International Organisation for Migration .

Mr Trump also became irritated as he swatted away a fly and then turned the interruption into an attack on lawmakers.

“That’s a nasty fly,” he joked.

“I don’t like those suckers! I don’t know about you in  New Mexico  but I’m not into flies or mosquitos. I don’t like snakes too much – we have plenty of them in New York and Washington, a different variety.”

“We got a lot of snakes in Washington DC, we got a lot of snakes in New York!”

He went on to repeat false claims about Democrats supporting “extreme late term abortion” before promising to “find new cures for childhood cancer” and “end the AIDS epidemic.”

But only 1.3 per cent of abortions occur after 21 weeks of pregnancy in the US, according to the CDC, and Democrats have only supported such cases where it is a medical emergency.

Mr Trump also claimed he had “made much more money” and “lived better” than his opponents before becoming a politician.

“If you go by the old standards – better houses, better schools, [I] made much more money. [I] lived better and then I decided to run for president.”

The second protester heckled the 73-year-old at the end of the rally, leading him to complain about being interrupted during the “crescendo” of his speech.

“Gee, it’s too bad – right in the crescendo. I just readied the big beautiful crescendo and this character’s going back home,” Mr Trump said.

“It’s two people tonight – remember when they say “Massive protests at the Trump rally” – two people.”

The crowd chanted “USA!’ as the second heckler was removed.

New Mexico is a Democratic leaning state though Republicans are hoping to flip it in 2020.

 
 
 
Ender
4.1  Ender  replied to  Tessylo @4    one month ago
“They’ve taken the Old Grey Lady and broken her down, destroyed her virtue and ruined her reputation,” Mr Trump said.

Politics 101. Accuse others of what you are doing yourself.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
4.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tessylo @4    one month ago
[I] made much more money. [I] lived better and then I decided to run for president.”

There's a solution to that....don't run for a second term.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
4.3  1stwarrior  replied to  Tessylo @4    one month ago

One protester - of course, coming from the "Independent", that figure will probably increase to 1,000 by the end of the week.

 
 
 
Tessylo
4.3.1  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  1stwarrior @4.3    one month ago

Two protesters.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
4.3.2  1stwarrior  replied to  Tessylo @4.3.1    one month ago
 
 
 
Tessylo
4.3.3  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  1stwarrior @4.3.2    one month ago
'The second protester heckled the 73-year-old at the end of the rally, leading him to complain about being interrupted during the “crescendo” of his speech.'

Two protesters.  

 
 
 
1stwarrior
4.3.5  1stwarrior  replied to  Tessylo @4.3.3    one month ago

Nice try Tessy - put some thought into your next answer 'cause your source and your answer are both wrong.

 
 
 
Dulay
4.3.6  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @4.3.5    one month ago
Nice try Tessy - put some thought into your next answer 'cause your source and your answer are both wrong.

Yes, Tessy was wrong. There were WAY more than two protestors. 

https://www.lcsun-news.com/story/news/2019/09/17/president-trump-rally-protest-support-2020-campaign-new-mexico-visit/2349077001/

 
 
 
1stwarrior
4.3.7  1stwarrior  replied to  Dulay @4.3.6    one month ago

Yeah - they were OUTSIDE.  Inside, there was only ONE who was escorted out.

Oh, BTFW (your most favorite phrase), the Las Cruces Sun is by far one of the worst in the state for reporting.  Can we say DEMOCRATIC STATE?????

 
 
 
Split Personality
4.3.8  Split Personality  replied to  1stwarrior @4.3.7    one month ago

Wrong,

Two HECKLERS (protesters) were removed from the inside of the "event" for interrupting the POTUS "rally" by shouting at him

as evidenced by the President's own words. 

( since they never take the camera off of Trump, we just have to believe him when he says they are being removed, right? )

One of the many peaceful protesters outside the event was arrested.

Yes I watched it and it was on every news channel that night.

Don't like NM? Stay out of it.

 
 
 
Dulay
4.3.9  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @4.3.7    one month ago
Oh, BTFW (your most favorite phrase),

Actually, my 'favorite phrase' is 'bullshit'. 

the Las Cruces Sun is by far one of the worst in the state for reporting.  Can we say DEMOCRATIC STATE?????

So are you saying that the Las Cruces Sun fabricated all of those photos of protestors OUTSIDE of the venue? If not, WTF is your point? 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
4.3.10  1stwarrior  replied to  Dulay @4.3.9    one month ago

C'mon Dulay - the pics are the protesters OUTSIDE the venue - the comment reference the INSIDE.

 
 
 
Dulay
4.3.11  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @4.3.10    one month ago
C'mon Dulay - the pics are the protesters OUTSIDE the venue - the comment reference the INSIDE.

That answers my questions how 1st? 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
4.3.12  1stwarrior  replied to  Dulay @4.3.11    one month ago

Don't know Dulay - the discussion was regarding the INSIDE, not the OUTSIDE.

 
 
 
Tessylo
4.3.13  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Dulay @4.3.6    one month ago

I was commenting on inside the rally.  There was one protester at the beginning who was removed and one protester towards the end of the rally who was removed.

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
4.3.14  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  1stwarrior @4.3.7    one month ago

There were two inside - one at the beginning and one at the end.

If you'd read the article you would have known that.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
4.3.15  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  1stwarrior @4.3.12    one month ago

You're the one who was talking about outside.  Not me.

jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dulay
4.3.16  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @4.3.12    one month ago
Don't know Dulay - the discussion was regarding the INSIDE, not the OUTSIDE.

Yet you commented on the Las Cruces Sun and the DEMOCRATIC STATE. I asked you about THAT comment and you deflect. 

 
 
 
Heartland American
4.4  Heartland American  replied to  Tessylo @4    one month ago

There was nothing hate filled in or about that speech.  

 
 
 
MrFrost
5  MrFrost    one month ago

Trump is polling at 25% among Latinos. 

 
 
 
Ender
5.1  Ender  replied to  MrFrost @5    one month ago

That he polls that high anywhere is disturbing.

 
 
 
MUVA
5.1.1  MUVA  replied to  Ender @5.1    one month ago

I think he will end up with enough support from minority’s push him to victory next year he only has to move the percentages a little to get there.

 
 
 
Ender
5.1.2  Ender  replied to  MUVA @5.1.1    one month ago

I don't see his poll numbers rising.

 
 
 
Tessylo
5.1.3  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Ender @5.1.2    one month ago

Me neither.  

But you know his supporters will take one poll that favors the 'president' over 20 others that don't.  

 
 
 
MUVA
5.1.4  MUVA  replied to  Ender @5.1.2    one month ago

They are better with minority’s then last election.

 
 
 
Tessylo
5.1.5  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  MUVA @5.1.4    one month ago

Who is 'they'?

 
 
 
MUVA
5.1.6  MUVA  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.5    one month ago

The numbers is they.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
5.1.7  1stwarrior  replied to  Ender @5.1.2    one month ago

Read the papers - not the polls since we have a few members here who no longer believe in them.

 
 
 
Ender
5.1.8  Ender  replied to  1stwarrior @5.1.7    one month ago
Read the papers

Do people still do that? : )

 
 
 
Tessylo
5.1.9  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  1stwarrior @5.1.7    one month ago

The only 'polls' that tRump or his supporters follow are the ones with strippers.  

 
 
 
jungkonservativ111
5.1.10  jungkonservativ111  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.9    one month ago

Cling to your polls. How did that turn out for you in 2016 BTW? jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Split Personality
5.1.11  Split Personality  replied to  jungkonservativ111 @5.1.10    one month ago

Exactly what one could say to Muva, right?

 
 
 
Tessylo
5.1.12  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  jungkonservativ111 @5.1.10    one month ago

Cling to this. . . 

 
 
 
XDm9mm
5.2  XDm9mm  replied to  MrFrost @5    one month ago
Trump is polling at 25% among Latinos. 

That's GREAT!!!!   In 2016, he was at 18% per Quinepac (sp?) so he's on the right trajectory, and he has over a year to get more!!!!

 
 
 
Ender
5.2.1  Ender  replied to  XDm9mm @5.2    one month ago
A new poll released Tuesday shows all top-tier Democratic presidential candidates leading  President Trump  by more than 40 percentage points among Hispanic registered voters nationwide.
The Univision poll, conducted by Latino Decisions and North Star Opinion Research, shows that 73 percent of Hispanic voters surveyed plan to vote for a Democratic candidate, while only 16 percent plan to vote for Trump.
 
 
 
XDm9mm
5.2.2  XDm9mm  replied to  Ender @5.2.1    one month ago
A new poll released Tuesday shows all top-tier Democratic presidential candidates leading  President Trump  by more than 40 percentage points among Hispanic registered voters nationwide.
The Univision poll, conducted by Latino Decisions and North Star Opinion Research, shows that 73 percent of Hispanic voters surveyed plan to vote for a Democratic candidate, while only 16 percent plan to vote for Trump.

You obviously still haven't learned your lesson about polls.

First, polls had Clinton essentially winning in a landslide.  Hell, they gave her a 95 to 99% chance of winning.

Second, predicated on how a poll is worded, you can get Islamic Jihadists to accept the Pope as their leader and head off to confession.

Polls can and do come to a predetermined conclusion predicated on who does the polling and who is paying the bill.

 
 
 
Ender
5.2.3  Ender  replied to  XDm9mm @5.2.2    one month ago

I was responding to your post...about a poll.

 
 
 
Tessylo
5.2.4  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  XDm9mm @5.2.2    one month ago

The 'president' had help from Putin and Comey.

jrSmiley_82_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
XDm9mm
5.2.5  XDm9mm  replied to  Ender @5.2.3    one month ago
I was responding to your post...about a poll.

And I was responding to a post by Frost.  "Trump is polling at 25% among Latinos." 

See how that works?

I simply made a comparison from 2016 to what Frost indicated is current.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
5.2.6  XDm9mm  replied to  Tessylo @5.2.4    one month ago
The 'president' had help from Putin and Comey.

Are you referring to the Russians that Clinton received funds from or those they paid?

And as to Comey, he let her slide on stuff that would have seen charges brought against anyone else.

 
 
 
Tessylo
5.2.7  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  XDm9mm @5.2.6    one month ago

Riiiiiiigggghhhhhhhhtttttttt. . . . . . . 

 
 
 
Ender
5.2.8  Ender  replied to  XDm9mm @5.2.5    one month ago

And I made a comparison to your comment about a poll from a poll done in September...

See how that works?

 
 
 
Tessylo
5.2.9  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  XDm9mm @5.2.6    one month ago

Damn it, now I have a song in my head that I just can't get out.

What funds were they that Clinton received?

As to Comey, what stuff?

 
 
 
XDm9mm
5.2.10  XDm9mm  replied to  Tessylo @5.2.9    one month ago
Damn it, now I have a song in my head that I just can't get out.

That sounds like a personal problem to me.  Deal with it.

What funds were they that Clinton received?

Maybe the $140+ million that the Clinton Foundation received?

As to Comey, what stuff?

Mishandling classified documents for one.   Is your memory that short that you forgot when he effectively laid out a prima facie case against her then claimed there was "no precedent" (Here's a hint Comey, until the first case, there never is a precedent.) and then compounded that with the "no intent" bullshit.   Here's another hint Comey, there are thousands of people in prison for crimes they committed even though there was "no intent" (involuntary manslaughter is one that immediately comes to mind.)

 
 
 
XDm9mm
5.2.11  XDm9mm  replied to  Ender @5.2.8    one month ago
And I made a comparison to your comment about a poll from a poll done in September... See how that works?

And your point is?   Did I dispute that or just tell you what I responded to?

 
 
 
MrFrost
5.2.12  MrFrost  replied to  XDm9mm @5.2    one month ago
That's GREAT!!!!   In 2016, he was at 18% per Quinepac (sp?) so he's on the right trajectory, and he has over a year to get more!!!!

What's not so great is that he has lost ground in virtually every other demographic. The ONLY demographic where he is polling over 50% is white males, (54%). Add to that, the day he took office, he was at 46% and has never been above that, (RCP). 

 
 
 
Tessylo
5.2.13  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  XDm9mm @5.2.10    one month ago

Citation?  

 
 
 
Tessylo
5.2.14  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  XDm9mm @5.2.10    one month ago

You know which song I mean and you need to provide a source for the Clinton foundation

As to the rest of your bullshit about Comey blah fucking blah

 
 
 
MUVA
5.2.15  MUVA  replied to  Tessylo @5.2.14    one month ago

Are you really that angry or is it just for effect I’m going try to make less mad have a great no fabulous night.

 
 
 
Tessylo
5.2.16  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Tessylo @5.2.14    one month ago

I wasn't talking to you was I MUVA?

Who's angry?

 
 
 
MUVA
5.2.17  MUVA  replied to  Tessylo @5.2.16    one month ago

I was just asking I’m taking it upon myself to bring the country together starting with us if we can get along there is hope don’t you agree.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
5.2.19  Trout Giggles  replied to  MUVA @5.2.17    one month ago

That's a really nice thought, MUVA. I hope you have a nice day

 
 
 
XDm9mm
5.2.20  XDm9mm  replied to  Tessylo @5.2.14    one month ago
You know which song I mean

[deleted]

As to providing a source....  as you always like to tell other people...  Google is your friend.   It should be easy enough.  I'll be nice and give you a hint:

Did the Clinton foundation receive 140 million dollars from a Russian
 
 
 
Dulay
5.2.21  Dulay  replied to  XDm9mm @5.2.10    one month ago
Maybe the $140+ million that the Clinton Foundation received?

Nope, that can't be it.

Unlike the Trump Foundation which has a HIGH concern advisory, the Clinton Foundation has a LOW concern advisory and an overall 92.40 rating by Charity Navigator and Guide Star for financials, accountability and transparency. 

Anyone with the slightest bit of intellectual curiosity could look into the Clinton Foundation and find the FACTS for themselves before making false allegations. Others are too lazy and prefer to just bloviate bullshit. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
5.2.22  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  XDm9mm @5.2.20    one month ago

Hot and bothered about you?

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

Fascinated with you?

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

[ deleted ]

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
5.2.23  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  XDm9mm @5.2.10    one month ago

More the case of plain old selective memory loss on the part of the progressive liberal left. Reminds me of the 3 monkeys.

 
 
 
WallyW
5.3  WallyW  replied to  MrFrost @5    one month ago

Trump is polling at 25% among Latinos. 

That's just the illegal population

Among Hispanic citizens,,it's much higher

 
 
 
freepress
6  freepress    one month ago

He loves them so much he puts them in cages treated worse than dogs in a shelter.

 
 
 
Sparty On
6.1  Sparty On  replied to  freepress @6    one month ago

Yep, just like his predecessor but we didn't hear much bitching from the left we he did it.

Shocker of all shockers!

 
 
 
jungkonservativ111
6.2  jungkonservativ111  replied to  freepress @6    one month ago

Only the illegal ones. You know, the ones who broke our laws to get here.

 
 
 
Tessylo
6.2.1  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  jungkonservativ111 @6.2    one month ago

Seeking asylum is not illegal.  

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
6.2.2  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  jungkonservativ111 @6.2    one month ago

And even where they are today is probably a hell of a lot cleaner and safer than the shitholes they came from. Look at the bright side. They are now living in a "gated" community safe from the supposed oppression of their natural home courtesy of the American GovCo and taxpayer.............and probably better fed. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
6.2.3  1stwarrior  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.1    one month ago

Tessy - for 'bout the 100th time, seeking asylum is NOT illegal - crossing the border WITHOUT permission IS illegal.  Crossing the border WITHOUT permission to seek asylum IS illegal.  Requesting asylum places a person on a holding list for further investigation into their quest, but DOES NOT give them permission to be in or stay in the U.S. - they ARE STILL ILLEGAL ALIENS - WAITING FOR PERMISSION to enter the U.S. to be able to go to court to plead their case.

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
6.2.4  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  1stwarrior @6.2.3    one month ago

SEEKING ASYLUM IS NOT ILLEGAL 

 
 
 
jungkonservativ111
6.2.6  jungkonservativ111  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.4    one month ago

They are not asylum  seekers untill they have been processed. Until then they are basically invaders. Learn the law. Also, Trump has basically closed up that loophole by signing an agreement stating refugees have to apply forn aslyum in mexico now. Time to find a new angle

 
 
 
Tessylo
6.2.7  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  jungkonservativ111 @6.2.6    one month ago

Yes they are seeking asylum which is not illegal

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
6.2.8  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  1stwarrior @6.2.3    4 weeks ago

Some people will argue until the sun sets just for the sole sake of arguing to try to get their point across even when they know they are wrong....

 
 
 
1stwarrior
6.3  1stwarrior  replied to  freepress @6    one month ago

Well, Barry had many more than Trump and your voice was where?

 
 
 
Dulay
6.3.1  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @6.3    one month ago
Well, Barry had many more than Trump and your voice was where?

Well if that were true, it merely proves just how much better 'Barry' did it than Trump is. After all, 'Barry' didn't need tent camps to house tens of thousands of children for months at a time. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
6.3.2  1stwarrior  replied to  Dulay @6.3.1    one month ago

And "Barry" didn't receive OVER 80,000 ILLEGAL ALIENS a MONTH nor did he have to scramble to make do with what he had available due to the onslaught of ILLEGAL ALIENS crossing the border.

And, no, it is/was not "tens of thousands" of ILLEGAL ALIEN children for months at a time - your quote should have had "immigrants" vice "children".

Use Google - it's your friend.

" The United States government holds tens of thousands of immigrants in detention"

"over twelve thousand immigrant children are housed by facilities under the supervision of the Office of Refugee Resettlement's program for Unaccompanied Alien Children."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_detention_in_the_United_States

 
 
 
Tessylo
6.3.3  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  1stwarrior @6.3.2    one month ago

Wikipedia's is your source?

Hilarious 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
6.3.4  1stwarrior  replied to  Tessylo @6.3.3    one month ago

I know - too much for you.

 
 
 
Dulay
6.3.5  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @6.3.2    one month ago
And "Barry" didn't receive OVER 80,000 ILLEGAL ALIENS a MONTH nor did he have to scramble to make do with what he had available due to the onslaught of ILLEGAL ALIENS crossing the border.

Since you are the one who insists that 'Barry had many more', HOW did that happen if what you say is true. It sure looks like you're contradicting yourself 1st. 

And, no, it is/was not "tens of thousands" of ILLEGAL ALIEN children for months at a time - your quote should have had "immigrants" vice "children".

The CHILDREN held in tents aren't 'ILLEGAL ALIENS' 1st. They are asylum seekers. 

Want proof? READ your own fucking quote: 

"over twelve thousand immigrant children are housed by facilities under the supervision of the Office of Refugee Resettlement's program for Unaccompanied Alien Children."

'ILLEGAL ALIENS' don't go into the Refugee program 1st. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
6.3.6  1stwarrior  replied to  Dulay @6.3.5    one month ago

Yawnnnnnn

 
 
 
Dulay
6.3.7  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @6.3.6    one month ago

I'm not surprised that facts bore you 1st. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
6.3.8  1stwarrior  replied to  Dulay @6.3.7    one month ago

Sorry Dulay - FACTS don't bore me - people twisting them to suit their purpose bore me.

 
 
 
Dulay
6.3.9  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @6.3.8    one month ago
FACTS don't bore me - people twisting them to suit their purpose bore me.

What facts are you claiming I twisted 1st? Please be specific. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
6.3.10  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Dulay @6.3.5    one month ago

He's always contradicting himself.  

Par for the course.

 
 
 
Tessylo
6.3.11  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  1stwarrior @6.3.8    one month ago

I await you supplying actual facts.  

 
 
 
Sparty On
7  Sparty On    one month ago

Blah, blah, blah ......

This is going to be fun watching the fringe left implode again in 2020.

Your "resist movement" is blowing up in your faces.   The only hope you really have is if the economy tanks.

It's been hilarious to watch so far!   2020 promises to be a barrel of monkey's by comparison.

I'm looking forward to it.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
8  Vic Eldred    one month ago

New Mexico is rich in oil and natural gas, as a matter of fact it is a vital part of the NM economy and Trump touted his support for the fossil fuel industry while taking on democrats for their policies of total reliance on renewable energy. I assume New Mexico's Hispanics heard that and know what it means.

Larga vida Trump!

 
 
 
Dulay
8.1  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    one month ago
New Mexico is rich in oil and natural gas

New Mexico has MORE than it's share of sun and wind too. New Mexico has codified their goals for renewable energy and Trump will have nothing to say about it. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
8.2  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    one month ago

What does that mean?  tRump is a huge fat tub of lard?

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online



Tacos!
FLYNAVY1


25 visitors