Trump Is Too Stupid To Be President Of The United States

  
By:  john-russell  •  4 weeks ago  •  164 comments

Trump Is Too Stupid To Be President Of The United States

Trump asked the president of another country to investigate his main political rival for 2020. He also asked that president of another country to work with Trump's personal lawyer in this "investigation". 

It doesnt matter if there was a quid pro quo.  We have absolute proof that the president of the United States is personally corrupt and unethical. 

The Republicans want to gaslight America into believing that it is perfectly OK for him to ask a foreign government to discredit Trump's election opponent. Biden is a private citizen, not a government figure. 

They already have enough to remove Trump from office. 

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
Find text within the comments Find 
 
JohnRussell
1  author  JohnRussell    4 weeks ago

He will be impeached. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.1  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @1    4 weeks ago

He's too stupid to wipe his big fat ass.  I bet Hannity does it for him.  

 
 
 
dennis smith
1.1.1  dennis smith  replied to  Tessylo @1.1    4 weeks ago

It is a fact that the voters disagreed with you in 2016 and as long as you are speculating , I will also. Trump will win again in 2020.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
1.1.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  dennis smith @1.1.1    4 weeks ago
It is a fact that the voters disagreed with you in 2016 and as long as you are speculating

It is a fact that the majority of voters voted for Hillary in 2016 so not really sure what you're talking about. A minority of voters disagreed, the majority know he's too fat and stupid to wipe his own ass. Trumps favorite choice of toilet paper is called "Corey Lewandowsky" thus the joke around the white house of "Don't squeeze the Corey!'....

 
 
 
cjcold
1.1.3  cjcold  replied to  dennis smith @1.1.1    4 weeks ago

Disregard 2018 at your peril. Voters will come out in droves against Trump.

 
 
 
JBB
1.1.4  JBB  replied to  cjcold @1.1.3    4 weeks ago

Yeah, but since Trump and the damn gop already have Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan and Minnesota nailed down there is really no reason for republicans to campaign in those states or for republicans to even bother to vote. After all, it is a done deal already. Russian hackers can handle it easy peasy. At least that is what Putin tells Trump in their intimate late night phone calls when Trump cannot sleep. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
1.1.5  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  dennis smith @1.1.1    3 weeks ago

The fact that 3 million more voters  chose Hillary and would seem to disagree with you.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
1.1.6  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  cjcold @1.1.3    3 weeks ago

As the popular vote doesn't elect, it is time to put pressure on the EC.

 
 
 
squiggy
1.2  squiggy  replied to  JohnRussell @1    4 weeks ago

He won't be convicted. If the dems falter one bit during the festival, (and they still haven't seen this ultimate sin on paper)  they'll be eating cofeve for another fourteen years.

 
 
 
Don Overton
1.2.1  Don Overton  replied to  squiggy @1.2    4 weeks ago

So you love a president that is trying to destroy the Constitution of the United States.  [deleted]

 
 
 
livefreeordie
1.2.2  livefreeordie  replied to  Don Overton @1.2.1    4 weeks ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
WallyW
1.2.3  WallyW  replied to  Don Overton @1.2.1    4 weeks ago

That's why Hillary lost.

Your comment is not logical.

 
 
 
dennis smith
1.2.4  dennis smith  replied to  Don Overton @1.2.1    4 weeks ago

Wrong Don, the dems have been whining and bitching about Trump since the day he won the 2016 election. Nothing has changed with them since then. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
1.2.5  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  livefreeordie @1.2.2    4 weeks ago
removed for context

[Tos violation

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
1.2.6  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  livefreeordie @1.2.2    4 weeks ago
removed for context

Apparently gross generalizations about some people is okay as long as you're bashing "The Dems" but "The Reps" are off limits. Good to know.

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.2.7  Tessylo  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.2.6    4 weeks ago

That's the name of the game around here I've found.  Dems can be insulted to no end.  But don't you dare say anything, ANYTHING, about the republicans.

 
 
 
livefreeordie
1.3  livefreeordie  replied to  JohnRussell @1    4 weeks ago

Go for it John.  Trump will be re-elected in a landslide victory and the leftist Dems will be disgraced.  Unfortunately the ignorance of too many Americans will keep the communist ideology of the Dems alive

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
1.3.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  livefreeordie @1.3    4 weeks ago
Trump will be re-elected in a landslide victory

as prison prom Queen...?

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.3.2  Tessylo  replied to  igknorantzrulz @1.3.1    4 weeks ago

He will be elected in a landslide as PUSSY ASS BITCH

 
 
 
XDm9mm
1.4  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @1    4 weeks ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
2  Just Jim NC TttH    4 weeks ago

                              He also asked that president of another country to work with Trump's                           personal lawyer in this "investigation".

Along with the AG. 

320

 
 
 
JohnRussell
2.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2    4 weeks ago

Trumpsters will all look like total fools before all this is done. 

After three years of Trump moaning and wailing about how he was under a "witch hunt" for trying to get a foreign power (Russia) to intervene in our 2016 election campaign, he goes and does the same thing again in 2020. 

Biden is a private citizen. The only thing he is notable for , currently, is as an election opponent of Trumps.  And Trump asks a foreign government to discredit Biden. This is completely unethical and corrupt.  Trump should be removed from office and Trumpsters should punch themselves in the face until they come to their senses. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
2.1.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    4 weeks ago
Trumpsters will all look like total fools before all this is done. 

They have some catching up to do if that's the case. Dems got a BIIIIIG head start in the fool department.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.1.2  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    4 weeks ago
Trumpsters will all look like total fools before all this is done. 

JR...   you've been singing that refrain since November 2016.   And I love to tell you that fat lady didn't sing yet, and on this, well, more hot air from the rabid Trump haters.

 
 
 
Don Overton
2.1.3  Don Overton  replied to  XDm9mm @2.1.2    4 weeks ago

[Removed]

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
2.1.4  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    4 weeks ago

They already do.

 
 
 
lady in black
2.2  lady in black  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2    4 weeks ago

So apparently you think it's okay he did this....that it's no big thing....sad, really sad.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
2.2.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  lady in black @2.2    4 weeks ago

He offered their help to Ukraine in an investigation. Period. NO QUID PRO QUO.

 
 
 
Don Overton
2.2.2  Don Overton  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.2.1    4 weeks ago

[Trolling]

 
 
 
livefreeordie
2.2.3  livefreeordie  replied to  lady in black @2.2    4 weeks ago

not only ok, it's typical of every president.  It is foreign policy 101 for a president to do this kind of thing.  It's only because it's Trump that the left suddenly has a problem with it

 
 
 
WallyW
2.2.4  WallyW  replied to  lady in black @2.2    4 weeks ago

What did he do, precisely?

What about Biden interfering in another countries internal affairs?/

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.2.5  XDm9mm  replied to  WallyW @2.2.4    4 weeks ago
What about Biden interfering in another countries internal affairs?

Or possibly Obama sending actual operatives to interfere with the Israeli election of Netanyahu?

 
 
 
Dulay
2.3  Dulay  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2    4 weeks ago
He also asked that president of another country to work with Trump's                 personal lawyer in this "investigation".

WHY? Please do explain WHY Trump wanted Giuliani to have anything to do with it. Is the State Department and the Department of Justice so short handed that they need Giuliani as a go between? 

Now, each and every phone call, email and written account of Giuliani's participation in this will be scrutinized. Giuliani will be deposed by the Committees. The SoS and AG will be too. 

Oh and BTFW, information shared by the DOJ, State and Giuliani is NOT privileged. Neither is all the shit that Giuliani has been blathering about on Fox and to the NYT in May. By bloviating, Giuliani blew the privilege. 

 
 
 
loki12
2.3.1  loki12  replied to  Dulay @2.3    4 weeks ago

I realize you aren’t a lawyer, so I will give you a little heads up, the lawyer can’t wave the privilege, only the client can.

You are welcome.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
2.3.2  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Dulay @2.3    4 weeks ago
WHY? Please do explain WHY Trump wanted Giuliani to have anything to do with it. Is the State Department and the Department of Justice so short handed that they need Giuliani as a go between? 

He offered as a good will gesture. 

Now, each and every phone call, email and written account of Giuliani's participation in this will be scrutinized.

What participation? As far as I know, the "help" never materialized. Got a reputable refutation?

 
 
 
loki12
2.3.3  loki12  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.3.2    4 weeks ago

I wonder what happened to Brennan and Clapper, spending time with their family while they can?

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.3.4  XDm9mm  replied to  Dulay @2.3    4 weeks ago
Oh and BTFW, information shared by the DOJ, State and Giuliani is NOT privileged.

Any and all 'conversations' between the Secretary of State and the Attorney General fall under Executive Privilege.  Any conversation Trump has with his personal attorney fall under client attorney privilege. 

So, continue to "blather" on NT all about your expertise.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.3.5  Dulay  replied to  XDm9mm @2.3.4    4 weeks ago
Any and all 'conversations' between the Secretary of State and the Attorney General fall under Executive Privilege. 

READ MORE SLOWLY. 

I said there is NO Executive Privilege between the DOJ and Giuliani or State and Giuliani. 

Any conversation Trump has with his personal attorney fall under client attorney privilege. 

Not if either one has already blathered about it publicly. Once public, there is no privilege. 

So, continue to "blather" on NT all about your expertise.

Do tell, when have I ever claimed an expertise?

Cite the comment. I'll wait. 

 
 
 
Ronin2
2.3.6  Ronin2  replied to  Dulay @2.3.5    4 weeks ago
I said there is NO Executive Privilege between the DOJ and Giuliani or State and Giuliani. 

Then how could Obama extend executive privilege to Holder's wife for Fast and Furious. Or are you claiming that there is executive privilege between Holder and his wife for Fast and Furious?

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/eric-holder-wife-granted-executive-privilege/

"There are at least 20 emails, other communications, but principally emails between Holder and his spouse, Sharon Malone, a medical doctor here in Washington, D.C., and between Holder and his mother, now deceased," being withheld under an extraordinary claim of executive privilege as well as a dubious claim of deliberative process privilege under the Freedom of Information Act, according to Chris Farrell, director of research and investigations at Judicial Watch, in an interview with Newsmax TV. Executive privilege is often asserted in the context of legitimate government deliberations in discussing an issue or policy such as Cabinet meetings or meetings between the president and his advisers. The parties must be government officials, and the privilege does not extend to communications with family members regarding government actions.

So the real question is Giuliani considered a government official, being Trump's personal lawyer. Is he a part of the WH legal counsel? If so, then yes, executive privilege can be extended.

 
 
 
Tessylo
2.3.7  Tessylo  replied to  loki12 @2.3.1    4 weeks ago

Looks like loki and friends have  been watching Law and Order with all of their law expertise and what not

 
 
 
Dulay
2.3.8  Dulay  replied to  Ronin2 @2.3.6    3 weeks ago
Then how could Obama extend executive privilege to Holder's wife for Fast and Furious. Or are you claiming that there is executive privilege between Holder and his wife for Fast and Furious?

The privilege was on Holder's emails, NOT his wife's emails. 

IF the emails originate with Giuliani, the is NO privilege. 

BTFW, the Obama WH DOCUMENTED every Executive Privilege claim. There is no such documentation from Trump. 

Oh and BTFW, Giuliani JUST 'shared' a text he received from Volker: 

"Mr Mayor — really enjoyed breakfast this morning, As discussed, connecting you here with Andrey Yermak, who is very close to President Zelensky. I suggest we schedule a call together on Monday — maybe 10am or 11am Washington time? Kurt"

Opps!

Someone really needs to grab the shovel away from Giuliani. 

So the real question is Giuliani considered a government official, being Trump's personal lawyer.

NO. 

Is he a part of the WH legal counsel?

NO. 

If so, then yes, executive privilege can be extended.

NO. 

 
 
 
loki12
2.4  loki12  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2    4 weeks ago

This article is hysterical, the democrats said he mentioned Biden 8 times, and said he would withhold aide. None of that happened. But the democrat sycophants have definitely moved from droolers to foamers. 

Watch, some fucking moron will say this  transcript isn’t accurate.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
2.4.1  Ozzwald  replied to  loki12 @2.4    4 weeks ago

Watch, some fucking moron will say this  transcript isn’t accurate.

Is it accurate? 

How would we know? 

Has anyone in the Trump administration ever released known false information to protect Trump before???

.....(Barr summary).....

 
 
 
Tessylo
2.4.2  Tessylo  replied to  Ozzwald @2.4.1    4 weeks ago

I'm sure this 'transcript' is Barr's 'summary' as well.  

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.3  loki12  replied to  Ozzwald @2.4.1    4 weeks ago

That didn't take long

 
 
 
Ozzwald
2.4.4  Ozzwald  replied to  loki12 @2.4.3    4 weeks ago

That didn't take long

So can you answer the question?

How would we know if it is accurate?

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.5  loki12  replied to  Ozzwald @2.4.4    4 weeks ago

It's not up to me to prove it's accurate. If you question the accuracy, the onus is on you to prove it's not, that's how due process works, Thanks for playing and good luck! 

 
 
 
Don Overton
2.4.6  Don Overton  replied to  Ozzwald @2.4.4    4 weeks ago

You know he can't.  Trumpetts have no answers that make any logical sense

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.4.7  XDm9mm  replied to  Ozzwald @2.4.4    4 weeks ago
How would we know if it is accurate?

Can you prove otherwise?  Yeah, I didn't think so.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
2.4.8  Ozzwald  replied to  loki12 @2.4.5    4 weeks ago
It's not up to me to prove it's accurate.

If you are claiming it is accurate, then it is up to you to prove it.  That's how it works.

If you question the accuracy, the onus is on you to prove it's not, that's how due process works, Thanks for playing and good luck! 

Reports state that the whistle blower's report indicated Trump making the Biden investigation request 8 times during the phone call.  The released transcript only shows 2.  Where are the other 6?

There is a notation on the document saying it does not represent a "verbatim transcript" but is based on "notes and recollections" of those listening and memorializing the call.

The Trump administration has released "summaries" before that were so wildly inaccurate as to be misleading. (i.e. Barr summary)

Thanks for playing and good luck! 

Thanks but don't need luck, this win was a slam dunk.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.4.9  XDm9mm  replied to  Ozzwald @2.4.8    4 weeks ago
Reports state that the whistle blower's report indicated Trump making the Biden investigation request 8 times during the phone call.

Are you speaking about the "whistle blower" who had no direct knowledge of the call and was "reporting" on hearsay?  That whistle blower?

Thanks but don't need luck, this win was a slam dunk.  

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Ender
2.4.10  Ender  replied to  XDm9mm @2.4.9    4 weeks ago

How do you know the WB had no direct knowledge when we don't even know who it was.

That is only listening to trump and believing what ever he says.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.4.11  Dulay  replied to  loki12 @2.4    4 weeks ago
Watch, some fucking moron will say this  transcript isn’t accurate.

Actually, the memo lists many reasons why it may not be accurate. 

 
 
 
WallyW
2.4.12  WallyW  replied to  loki12 @2.4.3    4 weeks ago

And your description of them fits perfectly    jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.4.13  XDm9mm  replied to  Ender @2.4.10    4 weeks ago
How do you know the WB had no direct knowledge when we don't even know who it was.

It's been reported by talking heads referring to information provided them by people familiar with the IG report.

Hell, hearsay is good for the Democrats, why not for Trump?

 
 
 
WallyW
2.4.14  WallyW  replied to  Ozzwald @2.4.8    4 weeks ago

How do you know the whistle blowers report is accurate?

 
 
 
Ender
2.4.15  Ender  replied to  XDm9mm @2.4.13    4 weeks ago

So in other words, you heard it on fox news...

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.16  loki12  replied to  Ozzwald @2.4.8    4 weeks ago

I’m reading your posts, you need luck! You questioned its accuracy, put up or shut up.

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.17  loki12  replied to  Ozzwald @2.4.8    4 weeks ago

Holy fuck, the whistle blower had no direct knowledge, ie they are as accurate as Blasey ford, whose own best friend said she was full of shit, but the left still believe the lying cunt. The transcript is accurate, the whistle blower who never heard the call or read the transcript is obviously full of shit, which is readily apparent to anyone who doesn’t have their head up their ass.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.4.18  igknorantzrulz  replied to  loki12 @2.4.16    4 weeks ago

How about YOU

put up or shut up.

that;s the way it works, accept for me, cause i'm the exception

 
 
 
Ender
2.4.19  Ender  replied to  loki12 @2.4.17    4 weeks ago
Holy fuck, the whistle blower had no direct knowledge

And again, you don't know that. At one point trump even said he didn't know who it was....

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.4.20  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Ender @2.4.19    4 weeks ago

a few points/times.

first h claimed it was a partisan , then claimed he didn't know

i ALWAYS believe him when he says he doesn't know

 
 
 
Ender
2.4.21  Ender  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.4.20    4 weeks ago

Hell, even McConnell said he didn't know why aid to the country was withheld and never got an answer.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.4.22  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Ender @2.4.21    4 weeks ago

It is sooooo damn obvious why Trump held it up.

Even the edited phone text is so obvious, as the right continues to spin centrifugal ,  while it again attempts to force ignorance upon USAll 

 
 
 
Ender
2.4.23  Ender  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.4.22    4 weeks ago

It just amazes me that some will twist themselves beyond recognition defending this buffoon. Even denying the obvious.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.4.24  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Ender @2.4.23    4 weeks ago

His cult like defenders will be studied by sociologists and psychologists for years

 
 
 
Ender
2.4.25  Ender  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.4.24    4 weeks ago

It's almost like they are stuck now. Once they let trump take over the party, what would they do without him. They let him become the defacto leader and change the party.

How could they ever go back and who would lead the charge. They would be rudderless.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.4.26  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Ender @2.4.25    4 weeks ago

it's quite possible, actually likely, the Republican party will be substantially altered post Trump 

 
 
 
MrFrost
2.4.27  MrFrost  replied to  Ender @2.4.19    4 weeks ago
At one point trump even said he didn't know who it was....

And in almost the same damn sentence he said they were partisan. So..........how would he know if the person was partisan if he didn't even know who they were? 

I swear, someone needs to steal the microphone from grandpa before he flat out admits he is guilty, (which he pretty much already did).. LOL 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.4.28  igknorantzrulz  replied to  MrFrost @2.4.27    4 weeks ago

He's TOO MUCH Frosty !

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.29  loki12  replied to  Ender @2.4.19    4 weeks ago

Sigh.....CNN had earlier reported, citing a source familiar with the case, that the complaint was prompted by concerns over communications between the President and a foreign leader. The alleged whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications that partly prompted the complaint to the inspector general, an official briefed on the matter told CNN on Thursday. Instead, the whistleblower's concerns came in part from learning information that was not obtained during the course of their work, and those details have played a role in the administration's determination that the complaint didn't fit the reporting requirements under the intelligence whistleblower law, the official said.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.4.30  igknorantzrulz  replied to  loki12 @2.4.29    4 weeks ago
Sigh.....

A     Knarrroh   ?   what exactly r u supposin that answers ?

 
 
 
Ender
2.4.31  Ender  replied to  loki12 @2.4.29    4 weeks ago
The whistleblower's attorney, Andrew Bakaj, had no comment when asked about the claim that the individual did not have direct knowledge of the communication in question. When asked if the complaint deals with Ukraine, Bakaj again had no comment.
A source close to the whistleblower's legal team pushed back strongly against the assertion that the intelligence Community's Inspector General would accept "third-hand disclosures" and that what the official "outlined about lack of personal knowledge and not within their course of work seems like the beginning of a smear by those trying to discredit the whistleblower."
 
 
 
dennis smith
2.4.32  dennis smith  replied to  loki12 @2.4.5    4 weeks ago

Rambling by some on the left is commonplace on NT as witnessed by comments 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.4

 
 
 
dennis smith
2.4.33  dennis smith  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.4.24    4 weeks ago

IS that what your crystal ball tells you?

 
 
 
dennis smith
2.4.34  dennis smith  replied to  MrFrost @2.4.27    4 weeks ago

Once again, proclaimed guilty without any legal proceeding that provide proof. 

Throw out the constitution when it doesn't fit your little world. 

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.35  loki12  replied to  Ender @2.4.31    4 weeks ago

No comment says it all doesn’t it, you all keep beating that dead horse, you really don’t look that foolish.

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.36  loki12  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.4.30    4 weeks ago

How fucking stupid does a President have to be to appoint someone to the Supreme Court who was never a judge? What a complete fucking Moron.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.4.37  igknorantzrulz  replied to  loki12 @2.4.36    4 weeks ago
What a complete fucking Moron.

Are you referring to Trump or Dennis ?

Cause i don't believe Dennis is deserved of such.

 
 
 
Ender
2.4.38  Ender  replied to  loki12 @2.4.35    4 weeks ago

What is sad is trying to twist reality.

So on one hand you have 'talking heads' on fox news saying he wasn't there...

Then there is the statements made by the WB associates saying the IG would not accept that kind of information....

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.39  loki12  replied to  Ender @2.4.38    4 weeks ago

My post was from CNN, not fox, CNN said he had no first hand knowledge.

try again.

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.40  loki12  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.4.37    4 weeks ago

im referring to someone who is stupid enough to appoint a justice with no experience as a judge. You have to be a fucking moron to do or support that.

 
 
 
Ender
2.4.41  Ender  replied to  loki12 @2.4.39    4 weeks ago

Haha..Come on.

My reply to you was from the same article you quoted. In fact it was the paragraph right under what you quoted.

 I added a link in my original comment so others can see the whole context of the article, not some cherry picked piece that the WB associates were calling the beginning of a smear campaign.

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.42  loki12  replied to  Ender @2.4.41    4 weeks ago
Haha..Come on.

So your comment about fox news was just a bullshit trolling move, noted. 

CNN says he has no first hand knowledge! Period. His attorney at no point said he did. Period.

Dead horse by five lengths.

 
 
 
Ender
2.4.43  Ender  replied to  loki12 @2.4.36    4 weeks ago
How fucking stupid does a President have to be to appoint someone to the Supreme Court who was never a judge? What a complete fucking Moron.

I have it on authority, it has happened plenty of times.

Reagan had Renquist and Eisenhower had Warren.

 
 
 
Ender
2.4.44  Ender  replied to  loki12 @2.4.42    4 weeks ago

CNN did not say he had no first hand knowledge. They were quoting other people.

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.45  loki12  replied to  Ender @2.4.44    4 weeks ago

Deflection, his attorney didn’t dispute it,

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.46  loki12  replied to  Ender @2.4.43    4 weeks ago

Johnson had Fortas , another dickhead war monger.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.4.47  Dulay  replied to  loki12 @2.4.39    4 weeks ago
CNN had earlier reported, citing a source familiar with the case, that the complaint was prompted by concerns over communications between the President and a foreign leader.

That report is from LAST WEEK. Remember back when Trump was denying any of it ever happened. 

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.48  loki12  replied to  Dulay @2.4.47    4 weeks ago

And there is still no proof!

but please blather on,

Avenatti?

Flynn?

manafort?

you tds suffers are entertaining as anything on TV, except maybe Fredo, or Maddow, she is so unbelievably full of shit it defies reason.

That ignorant “news person” had trumps taxes in her hands, still claimed he paid no taxes. Then sputtered like a complete fool when they showed he paid millions. Classic as the we got trump this time we see here!

even if you get him, you are going to love president pence, he is so far right, he makes trump look like a progressive.

 
 
 
Ender
2.4.49  Ender  replied to  loki12 @2.4.45    4 weeks ago

It is not a deflection when his attorney just said ...no comment.

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.50  loki12  replied to  Ender @2.4.49    4 weeks ago

DID you read the whistle blower report?

NO FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE!

He keeps repeating the same phrase, I learned from................

 
 
 
Dulay
2.4.51  Dulay  replied to  loki12 @2.4.48    3 weeks ago
And there is still no proof!

Trump denied talking about Biden. He then provided proof that he did. 

Try to keep up. 

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.52  loki12  replied to  Dulay @2.4.51    3 weeks ago

I'm up to date Schit said he talked about biden 8 times!!!! Fail

You have a link to where trump said he never talked about Biden?  I'd love to read it.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.4.53  Dulay  replied to  loki12 @2.4.50    3 weeks ago
DID you read the whistle blower report?
NO FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE!
He keeps repeating the same phrase, I learned from................

"He" then names corroborating witnesses who the IG questioned and confirmed. 

The more interesting point IMHO is that this whistleblower is obviously someone who multiple high level officials were VERY comfortable with and who had contact with multiple levels of the IC. There is a very telling sentence in the complaint that makes me think that this is no low level 'guy'. 

 
 
 
Dulay
2.4.54  Dulay  replied to  loki12 @2.4.52    3 weeks ago
I'm up to date Schit said he talked about biden 8 times!!!! Fail

You have a link where Schiff said that he talked about Biden 8 times? 

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.55  loki12  replied to  Dulay @2.4.53    3 weeks ago
He" then names corroborating witnesses who the IG questioned and confirmed. 

So you have a link to where these witnesses were interviewed? you do realize they aren't protected under the whistle blower act, because they didn't blow the whistle, and can be fired and or prosecuted for sharing classified information. You can not talk to people about classified material even if they have a clearance unless and only unless they have a need to know.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.4.56  Dulay  replied to  loki12 @2.4.55    3 weeks ago
So you have a link to where these witnesses were interviewed? 

They read from the IG report in which he states that he interviewed witnesses. Go watch the hearing they had this morning, it should be on C-Span. 

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.57  loki12  replied to  Dulay @2.4.56    3 weeks ago

I did watch it, but i honestly may have missed it, 

 
 
 
Dulay
2.4.58  Dulay  replied to  loki12 @2.4.57    3 weeks ago

I wish I had missed Nunes talking about nude pictures of Trump. 

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.59  loki12  replied to  Dulay @2.4.58    3 weeks ago

Look at the bright side, it is better to hear about them than to actually see them.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.4.60  Dulay  replied to  loki12 @2.4.59    3 weeks ago

Ain't THAT the truth!

 
 
 
Ender
2.4.61  Ender  replied to  loki12 @2.4.50    3 weeks ago

Ok, I have to give you that.

He was receiving reports from several WH staff. He was CIA and in the WH and still privy to what was going on.

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.62  loki12  replied to  Ender @2.4.61    3 weeks ago

The biggest concern, is how we know this? Who is sharing information with the press, and between workers. No wonder the Russians and Chinese know everything that’s going on. We are telling them willingly. That’s sad.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.4.63  Dulay  replied to  loki12 @2.4.62    3 weeks ago
The biggest concern, is how we know this?

I totally disagree. 

The biggest concern is that the Whistleblower statute is followed and that whistleblowers are protected from retaliation per the law. Without that guarantee, we go back to Nixonian coverups.  

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.64  loki12  replied to  Dulay @2.4.63    3 weeks ago

Only 1 is a whistleblower, the rest illegaly shared information with someone not authorized to receive that information. 

 
 
 
Ender
2.4.65  Ender  replied to  Dulay @2.4.63    3 weeks ago

Nixon was just dumb enough to record himself.  Haha

 
 
 
Ender
2.4.66  Ender  replied to  loki12 @2.4.62    3 weeks ago

One of the main problems to me would be the office of the president not following protocol.

Trying to make things classified that weren't classified just to cover his tracks.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.4.67  Dulay  replied to  loki12 @2.4.64    3 weeks ago
Only 1 is a whistleblower, the rest illegaly shared information with someone not authorized to receive that information. 

There is not one iota of evidence that the whistle blower received ANY information from ANYONE that he was not authorized to receive. Nothing In the IG report intimated that in any way. 

Seriously, whoever this guy is, it's OBVIOUS that he was trusted by a crap load of people in Trump's circle. WH officials, OMG and NSC staff are all cited in the complaint. Per the complaint he was a party @ two July interagency meetings. 

Just making shit up doesn't contribute to the discussion. 

 
 
 
Dulay
2.4.68  Dulay  replied to  Ender @2.4.65    3 weeks ago

Trump was just dumb enough to do this shit in the hearing of patriots. 

 
 
 
Ender
2.4.69  Ender  replied to  Dulay @2.4.68    3 weeks ago

IMO trump thinks that everything he does is justified. That is his shtick. His art of the deal bullcrap. What he has gotten away with for years in the private sector, he now thinks he can bring into public life.

 
 
 
loki12
2.4.70  loki12  replied to  Dulay @2.4.67    3 weeks ago

That’s how I feel about all your rambling,

now go ahead and have the last word, I know how important it is to you.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.4.71  Dulay  replied to  Ender @2.4.69    3 weeks ago
IMO trump thinks that everything he does is justified. That is his shtick. His art of the deal bullcrap. What he has gotten away with for years in the private sector, he now thinks he can bring into public life.

One of the sycophants here actually said that he believes what he says so he's not really lying. When they bring utterly nonsensical arguments like that, it's hard to think they will ever get their lips unlocked from Trump's BUTT.  

 
 
 
Don Overton
2.5  Don Overton  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2    4 weeks ago

[Trolling]

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
2.7  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2    3 weeks ago

Why is Trump involving his cross dressing senile personal lawyer to begin with?

 
 
 
loki12
2.7.1  loki12  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @2.7    3 weeks ago

I thought mueller was the democrats lackey?

 
 
 
Krishna
3  Krishna    4 weeks ago

Trump Is Too Stupid To Be President Of The United States

I totally agree!

In fact from the moment he was nominated, there wasn't the slightest doubt in my mind that he didn't have nowhere near the brains it would take to get elected!

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3.1  XDm9mm  replied to  Krishna @3    4 weeks ago
there wasn't the slightest doubt in my mind that he didn't have nowhere near the brains it would take to get elected!

Well, look who the fool is and who got elected.  Just saying.

 
 
 
squiggy
3.1.1  squiggy  replied to  XDm9mm @3.1    4 weeks ago

I think that’s in the funny way. Like - Trump might be an asshole but he’s my asshole.

 
 
 
Don Overton
3.1.2  Don Overton  replied to  squiggy @3.1.1    4 weeks ago

You are welcome to him, just keep him in a cage full of his shit and not out in the public

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3.1.3  XDm9mm  replied to  Don Overton @3.1.2    4 weeks ago
You are welcome to him, just keep him in a cage full of his shit and not out in the public

Why would he want to spend any time visiting Hillary?

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
3.1.4  igknorantzrulz  replied to  squiggy @3.1.1    4 weeks ago
I think that’s in the funny way. Like - Trump might be an asshole but he’s my asshole.

I took it as Trump DIDN'T get himself elected,

he was Put-in place.

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.1.5  Texan1211  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.1.4    4 weeks ago
I took it as Trump DIDN'T get himself elected,
he was Put-in place.

Have you alerted the authorities of your conspiracy theory?

Maybe they could interview all the members of the Electoral College.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
3.1.6  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.5    4 weeks ago

hey Tex, did you see i was commenting about Krishnas' comment that squiggy was commenting on, cause context is a wonderous thing

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.1.7  Texan1211  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.1.6    4 weeks ago

jrSmiley_84_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
3.1.8  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.7    4 weeks ago

whatever that means

 
 
 
dennis smith
3.1.9  dennis smith  replied to  Don Overton @3.1.2    4 weeks ago

You mistake Trump for Hillary

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.1.10  Texan1211  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.1.8    4 weeks ago
whatever that means

I have high hopes you'll figure it out.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
3.1.11  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  XDm9mm @3.1    3 weeks ago

Just because the members of the EC were fooled and hopefully not again, the rest of us see through Trump.

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.1.12  Texan1211  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @3.1.11    3 weeks ago
Just because the members of the EC were fooled 

What new excuse is this? Number 243 of "Why Hillary Lost"?

 
 
 
WallyW
3.2  WallyW  replied to  Krishna @3    4 weeks ago

As it turned out he was way smarter than Hillary

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
3.2.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  WallyW @3.2    4 weeks ago
As it turned out he was way smarter than Hillary

Now be honest. If Trump and Hillary had to take a college level general knowledge test (and there was no way to cheat) and you had to bet your life savings on who would score higher, which one would you bet on?

 
 
 
MrFrost
3.2.2  MrFrost  replied to  WallyW @3.2    4 weeks ago

As it turned out he was way smarter than Hillary

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Trump couldn't even make the top 15% at Wharton. He has the IQ of a turnip and his wife is only bright when donny throws a lamp at her. 

 
 
 
dennis smith
3.2.3  dennis smith  replied to  WallyW @3.2    4 weeks ago

Absolutely, Hillary was running in a different election that the one trump resoundly kicked her ass in. It is an electoral college not popular vote that counts. She was not intelligent enough to understand the difference. 

 
 
 
dennis smith
3.2.4  dennis smith  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3.2.1    4 weeks ago

Trump would as evidenced by how badly he schooled her in 2016.

 
 
 
dennis smith
3.2.5  dennis smith  replied to  MrFrost @3.2.2    4 weeks ago

You sound like a mudslinger from past elections.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3.2.6  XDm9mm  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3.2.1    4 weeks ago
which one would you bet on?

It sure as shit isn't the one who said numerous times in hearings:

I don't recall.

I can't remember.

I don't remember.

Hell, I got my first TS security briefing and classified materials handling instructions in October 2004.  I remember exactly where and the forms I had to sign.  I also remember the forms I had to sign when I was "debriefed" from specific SAP programs and projects through the years since.

So, yeah, I know exactly who I'd put my money on.   And it sure as shit ain't Hillary "I don't recall" Clinton.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
3.2.7  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  XDm9mm @3.2.6    4 weeks ago
It sure as shit isn't the one who said numerous times in hearings:

I don't recall.

I can't remember.

I don't remember.

" President Trump  told special counsel  Robert Mueller 's investigators on more than 30 occasions that he did not recall , remember or have independent memories of key events throughout the Russia investigation, leading Mueller's team to deem his written responses to questions “inadequate.”

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/439546-trump-told-mueller-more-than-30-times-he-did-not-remember-key-events

Besides the fact that none of what any of you brought up has any bearing on a college level general knowledge exam, just like your favorite moron, you apparently can't be honest either. There is no way in hell anyone would bet their life savings on Trump to win, unless perhaps you haven't saved a single penny while waiting for those coal jobs that are never coming back.

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.8  Dulay  replied to  XDm9mm @3.2.6    4 weeks ago
It sure as shit isn't the one who said numerous times in hearings:

11 hours of testimony, 3X. 

 
 
 
Dulay
3.2.9  Dulay  replied to  XDm9mm @3.2.6    4 weeks ago

Still waiting for you to post that link to my claims of expertise XD. 

Tic Toc. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
3.2.10  igknorantzrulz  replied to  MrFrost @3.2.2    4 weeks ago

Trump Is Too Stupid To Be President

Hell

Trump is too stupid to be the greeter at fckn Walmart !

 
 
 
dennis smith
3.3  dennis smith  replied to  Krishna @3    4 weeks ago

The voters of America disagreed with you and you just cannot handle that they do the electing

 
 
 
It Is ME
4  It Is ME    4 weeks ago

"Trump asked the president of another country to investigate his main political rival for 2020"

Hunter's running for President ?

 
 
 
Don Overton
4.1  Don Overton  replied to  It Is ME @4    4 weeks ago

Don't follower the news do ya

 
 
 
It Is ME
4.1.1  It Is ME  replied to  Don Overton @4.1    4 weeks ago
Don't follower the news do ya

Followerering the news is a bit complicated these days.

So .................. Hunter "IS" running for president ?

 
 
 
Don Overton
5  Don Overton    4 weeks ago

Impeach Trump, it's your patriotic duty

 
 
 
livefreeordie
5.1  livefreeordie  replied to  Don Overton @5    4 weeks ago

defending our country and our president against [Deleted] is the obligation of every freedom loving person.

 
 
 
MrFrost
5.1.1  MrFrost  replied to  livefreeordie @5.1    4 weeks ago

defending our country and our president against the Removed for context - s is the obligation of every freedom loving person.

Trump isn't a democrat. [deleted] Trump is a criminal and he is likely going to go to prison. 

 
 
 
dennis smith
5.1.2  dennis smith  replied to  MrFrost @5.1.1    4 weeks ago

Again with speculation

 
 
 
XDm9mm
5.2  XDm9mm  replied to  Don Overton @5    4 weeks ago
it's your patriotic duty

Now that's funny.  Thanks for the laughs Don.  Greatly appreciated!!

 
 
 
squiggy
5.3  squiggy  replied to  Don Overton @5    4 weeks ago

Oooo - and in a Halloween-appropriate color.

 
 
 
livefreeordie
6  livefreeordie    4 weeks ago

"The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man ; but only to have the law of nature for his rule."-

If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave "

Samuel Adams November 1772

 
 
 
Jack_TX
7  Jack_TX    4 weeks ago

Oh look.  Another "impeach Trump" seed.  

I, for one, am astonished.

 
 
 
MUVA
7.1  MUVA  replied to  Jack_TX @7    4 weeks ago

I was hoping there would be at least 5 or 6 more.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
7.1.1  XDm9mm  replied to  MUVA @7.1    4 weeks ago
I was hoping there would be at least 5 or 6 more.

Have no fear my man.  The day is not yet over

[deleted]

 
 
 
Jack_TX
7.1.2  Jack_TX  replied to  MUVA @7.1    4 weeks ago
I was hoping there would be at least 5 or 6 more.

Give it a half hour or so.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
8  author  JohnRussell    4 weeks ago

What we have on this seed is just right wingers, conservatives, and libertarians that are in denial. It actually is that simple. 

The president of the United States asked a foreign government to dig up dirt on a private US citizen. Someone who just miraculously happened to be the one leading the polls for the opposition political party facing him in next years election. 

This is NOT a tough call to decide on. It is misuse of the powers of the presidency, and Trump should be impeached, and he will be impeached. 

What I dont get anymore at this point is why conservatives are not calling for a new GOP presidential nominee, and force Trump to say he will not run for re-election.  That is the absolute minimum conservatives should be looking at, not constantly whining that he is being treated unfairly. He is a completely corrupt individual. Find another candidate for president and take your chances like that. Dont try and tell us that this fool Trump deserves four more years to embarrass and fuck up this country. 

 
 
 
dennis smith
8.1  dennis smith  replied to  JohnRussell @8    4 weeks ago

What we have on this seed is just right wingers, conservatives, and libertarians that are in denial. It actually is that simple. 

So now you are saying Mr Frost, Tesslyo etc are just right wingers, conservatives and libertarians.  

 
 
 
XDm9mm
8.2  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @8    4 weeks ago
What we have on this seed is just right wingers, conservatives, and libertarians that are in denial. It actually is that simple. 

Says the man who since November 2016 has been blasting the net with THIS IS THE ONE that will bring Trump down.  

This is the one that will get him impeached.   Oop's

Ok..   THIS is the one that will get him impeached.  Oop's

THIS is the one that will definitely bring Trump down and get him impeached.   Oop's.

JR, your track record is actually quite good at making errors.   Home runs, not so much.   Just sayin.

Hell, you haven't even made a base hit yet.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
8.2.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  XDm9mm @8.2    4 weeks ago

You and all of the rest of the Trumpsters here are spinning in circles. 

Your boy is a criminal.  

He asked a foreign government to investigate a private US citizen. One who happened to be Trump's political rival for the 2020 election. That is not allowed. 

Try to address what happened instead of addressing me. 

 
 
 
XDm9mm
8.2.2  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @8.2.1    4 weeks ago
You and all of the rest of the Trumpsters here are spinning in circles. 

JR...  you're been a Whirling Dervish since President Trump announced his desire to run for the Presidency.

 
 
 
bugsy
8.2.3  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @8.2.1    3 weeks ago

Trump Is Too Stupid To Be President Of The United States

John...seriously.....what does this say about Hillary and most of her supporters? Even they couldn't beat Trump.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
9  author  JohnRussell    4 weeks ago

from the transcript

President of Ukraine   :      ....would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense. We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps. specifically we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes..

President Trump   :    I would like you to do us a favor though

 
 
 
dennis smith
10  dennis smith    4 weeks ago

Still waiting for impeachment to reach the Senate. The dems will have shit stains in their pants if it does as the results will be another Trump landslide victory in 2020.

Please keep encouraging the dems in the House to make fools of  themselves.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online



loki12
Krishna


39 visitors