For The First Time In American History A President's Senior Staff Is Warning The Country Not To Re-elect Him
community » Discussions » Category » News & Politics » Discussion » For The First Time In American History A President's Senior Staff Is Warning The Country Not To Re-elect Him
Trump is now threatening to not help Pennsylvanians in any future disasters.
Quote Tweet
Daniel Dale
@ddale8
· 21h
Trump warns PA's governor that he won't forget how Wolf supposedly made it hard for him to secure a rally venue: "I'll remember it, Tom. I'm gonna remember it, Tom. 'Hello, Mr. President, this is Governor Wolf, I need help, I need help.' You know what? These people are bad."
"For The First Time In American History A President's Senior Staff Is Warning The Country Not To Re-Elect Him"
Funny thing is, every damned one of them are "FORMER"............but nice try John. Even Twitter and Facebook would have to caution readers................because a lot of people wouldn't get past the headline if this were a MSM story.....
The article title is taken DIRECTLY from the You Tube video. You have no argument.
Then your vision of it being directly from the video means squat. It is misleading as they are NOT "administration officials" any longer. Spin it any way you like. It's your article. But the title and your extrapolation of it, are false.
We are not going to argue about semantics. These people have been in senior positions in the Trump administration and they say their interactions with the president and their knowledge of what he is like show he should not be re-elected. I don't care what dates they were or were not in the administration, and neither do the people who made the video.
But the title and your extrapolation of it, are false.
My. Big. Butt. Whether you like it or not, they were all inner-circle people who resigned because they could not support a president who showed such little disregard for the people of this country and the Constitution.
Then your vision of it being directly from the video means squat. It is misleading as they are NOT "administration officials" any longer. Spin it any way you like. It's your article. But the title and your extrapolation of it, are false.
That's pretty hypocritical since YOUR 'vision of it' is quit misleading. Where did you get the "administration officials" QUOTE come from Jim? That looks like a false quote to me.
What about "A President's Senior Staff" in the headline didn't you understand? Makes it sound to me like they are presently his staff. And they aren't. Anything else to say?
So the fact that everybody who has ever worked for Trump finds him to be scum-of-the-earth doesn't change your slavish devotion to him? Sounds like fanaticism.
Would it not be fair to say, if the many persons who have disparaged Trump who once worked in his administration, got to know him, what he did, what he was, and because they disagreed with him were either fired or left on their own in disgust? When it is so many, how can it be ignored, or even criticized, that they are no longer there?
What about "A President's Senior Staff" in the headline didn't you understand? Makes it sound to me like they are presently his staff. And they aren't. Anything else to say?
This is becoming boring.
Actually is becoming a common tactic when some is losing an argument and tries, in vain, to derail a discussion.
I wonder...perhaps we should contact Perrie and add something to the CoC making it an offense to be extremely boring.
(OK to be boring once or twice in a row...being moderately boring is no real problem. But to obsessively post variations of the same boring no-value stuff really starts to bring down level of discussion...)
Yeah John, they are just part of the mountain of FORMER DISGRUNTLED staff. They’re all LOSERS that Trump hired but they just couldn’t keep up with the aggressive pace of Trump’s winning.
Yeah but Ruth Bader Ginsburg just died. That was a Trump win right? The guy is so full of himself that he probably sees it that way. Her dying before the election was result of all his hard work praying for it to happen.
So you are saying donald has bad judgement when it comes to picking staffers?
How can that be true? He hired Stormy Daniels to work on his staff...
Perhaps it would be better to simply call them all fluffers since that's the only job they perform anymore, they don't work for the American people as most previous administrations have done.
They have a revolving door in the now White trash House.
Yup, he ran out of relatives to hire, and the only other ones that will take the jobs are so incompetent that they couldn't get a well paying job otherwise, or are lobbyists that just want to trash their opposing departments.
I don't appreciate and I think I can speak for some others, that we don't appreciate you going from article to article and saying - another misleading title, etc., etc., etc.
Helped absolutely nothing. I calls 'em like I sees 'em. [deleted/meta]
Flocking to dog whistles isn't my thing.
[deleted / no value]
It's red meat dog whistle crap. Is it so hard to type "Trump administration" instead of just "Trump"? Only for the TDS ridden anti-Trumpers that eat this crap up. .
I am not the one claiming the presidents administration has nothing to do with him....
All I am saying is, that this is going on and there is a good possibility he hasn't been briefed on the proposed action until they have their ducks in a row and he is ready to make a yay or nay determination at such time as that is the case.
Helped absolutely nothing. I calls 'em like I sees 'em. [deleted/meta]
Flocking to dog whistles isn't my thing.
[deleted / no value]
Just a suggestion-- if you keep on breaking the rules, people will start finding your comments less and less valuable...and eventually start tuning you out.
IMO it would be helpful to you to "play by the rules". Why not try it for a while, I bet you'd find people would pay more attention to what you say...and probably even to respect you!
Never before have so many people who worked in an administration openly advocated that administration be thrown out of office at the next opportunity.
Excellent Video!
Starting the day with a misleading article title?
"For The First Time In American History A President's Senior Staff Is Warning The Country Not To Re-Elect Him"
Funny thing is, every damned one of them are "FORMER"............but nice try John. Even Twitter and Facebook would have to caution readers................because a lot of people wouldn't get past the headline if this were a MSM story.....
Political video of the year.
That was fabulous!
[deleted]
The article title is taken DIRECTLY from the You Tube video. You have no argument.
Then your vision of it being directly from the video means squat. It is misleading as they are NOT "administration officials" any longer. Spin it any way you like. It's your article. But the title and your extrapolation of it, are false.
We are not going to argue about semantics. These people have been in senior positions in the Trump administration and they say their interactions with the president and their knowledge of what he is like show he should not be re-elected. I don't care what dates they were or were not in the administration, and neither do the people who made the video.
Wouldn't expect you OR them to "feel" any differently.
My. Big. Butt. Whether you like it or not, they were all inner-circle people who resigned because they could not support a president who showed such little disregard for the people of this country and the Constitution.
[deleted]
That's pretty hypocritical since YOUR 'vision of it' is quit misleading. Where did you get the "administration officials" QUOTE come from Jim? That looks like a false quote to me.
What about "A President's Senior Staff" in the headline didn't you understand? Makes it sound to me like they are presently his staff. And they aren't. Anything else to say?
What about the use of quotation marks don't YOU understand?
What about "A President's Senior Staff" and "administration officials" being TWO distinct terms don't you understand?
If you're going to incessantly whine about the accuracy of a title, I'd suggest you refrain from attributing terms that don't exist in the title.
Sure Jim, how about you address the content of the seed instead of whining about it's title?
So the fact that everybody who has ever worked for Trump finds him to be scum-of-the-earth doesn't change your slavish devotion to him? Sounds like fanaticism.
Would it not be fair to say, if the many persons who have disparaged Trump who once worked in his administration, got to know him, what he did, what he was, and because they disagreed with him were either fired or left on their own in disgust? When it is so many, how can it be ignored, or even criticized, that they are no longer there?
This is becoming boring.
Actually is becoming a common tactic when some is losing an argument and tries, in vain, to derail a discussion.
I wonder...perhaps we should contact Perrie and add something to the CoC making it an offense to be extremely boring.
(OK to be boring once or twice in a row...being moderately boring is no real problem. But to obsessively post variations of the same boring no-value stuff really starts to bring down level of discussion...)
Yeah John, they are just part of the mountain of FORMER DISGRUNTLED staff. They’re all LOSERS that Trump hired but they just couldn’t keep up with the aggressive pace of Trump’s winning.
No one used that "winning" line after his first year because the truth was settling in.
Yeah but Ruth Bader Ginsburg just died. That was a Trump win right? The guy is so full of himself that he probably sees it that way. Her dying before the election was result of all his hard work praying for it to happen.
Just two letters for the misleading title and article. BS!)
His "best people" are against him.
I'm sure somewhere in there there is a point relevant to the article...........care to share YOUR take?
"I'm sure somewhere in there there is a point relevant to the article...."
Or not.
Trump's "best people" (in Trump's own words) are the ones coming out against him.
Sounds like rats deserting a sinking ship . . . too little, too late . . .
Because the proved him wrong. They weren't the best people and it showed
So you are saying donald has bad judgement when it comes to picking staffers?
"They weren't the best people and it showed"
LOL! Just like the 'president'
How can that be true? He hired Stormy Daniels to work on his staff...
Perhaps it would be better to simply call them all fluffers since that's the only job they perform anymore, they don't work for the American people as most previous administrations have done.
Not just bad, horrible! Just look at how many he has gone through.
They have a revolving door in the now White trash House.
Yup, he ran out of relatives to hire, and the only other ones that will take the jobs are so incompetent that they couldn't get a well paying job otherwise, or are lobbyists that just want to trash their opposing departments.
I remember that well...
He says that because he's smarter than everyone else..and extremely humble as well!
Don't believe me? Well, ask Trump himself!
Have ever this many 'Former' members of A PRESIDENTS SENIOR STAFF warned the country NOT TO VOTE to Re-Elect a president...?
Who died and made you moderator?
I don't appreciate and I think I can speak for some others, that we don't appreciate you going from article to article and saying - another misleading title, etc., etc., etc.
Glad I could help . . . .
Helped absolutely nothing. I calls 'em like I sees 'em. [deleted/meta]
Flocking to dog whistles isn't my thing.
[deleted / no value]
It's red meat dog whistle crap. Is it so hard to type "Trump administration" instead of just "Trump"? Only for the TDS ridden anti-Trumpers that eat this crap up. .
[deleted]
[deleted]
What I would call TDS is trying to say the donald administration is separate from donald....
Wouldn't expect anything less from you Ender.......................
I am not the one saying that...I am not the one claiming the presidents administration has nothing to do with him....
All I am saying is, that this is going on and there is a good possibility he hasn't been briefed on the proposed action until they have their ducks in a row and he is ready to make a yay or nay determination at such time as that is the case.
Riiiiiiigggghhhhhtttttt!
You act like the 'president' gives a shit about anyone but himself.
No one said he didn't. No matter how wrong he is, every single time.
You know not everything works that way. Departments can implement policy without it having to go over his desk for a signature.
Funny thing about that free speech thing. It does not make someone immune from dissenting opinion.
[deleted]
Where did I say that dear? That Jim wasn't entitled to his opinion, no matter how wrong he is, every time?
Of course they do, just as long as everybody else's view exactly mirrors theirs! Otherwise they are all absolutely wrong!😁
i read that
Just a suggestion-- if you keep on breaking the rules, people will start finding your comments less and less valuable...and eventually start tuning you out.
IMO it would be helpful to you to "play by the rules". Why not try it for a while, I bet you'd find people would pay more attention to what you say...and probably even to respect you!
They were valuable at one time?
I guess some don't mind others' dirty mouths, some say, unfuckwithable, and fuck all the time.
But no problem.
lol...that one got thrown at me a couple of times
Such a badass!
Like these gems?...............
He is a total fuck up.
The 'president' didn't do shit. He fucks up everything his tiny little hands touch
Just like this fucking moron 'president' disbanding the Pandemic Response Unit.
this incompetent fucking moron 'president' is doing/has done everything possible to fuck up the handling of this deadly virus.
The second photo, what the fuck is that?
Agreed, I have zero fucks to give regarding her.
Again, what the fuck does that have to do with what I said?
Yes.
Truth hurts doesn't it Jim?
Fuck! I fucking agree with much of what you fucking said-- god damnit!
Has nothing at all to do with truth. Just opinion. Please reread number 4. Thank you.
Truth.
You're wrong again.
Wasn't the subject I responded to. Do please try again. Thanks
Anybody who watched the 60 minutes interview knows that Trump is an ignorant lying fool.
Anybody who watched Sunday football knows the KC Chiefs might just repeat.
I enjoy speaking truths.
Truth, like presidential election polls, are highly subjective.
Only if you believe that "alternative facts" are real facts.
Nice deflection there.
Deflection?
Nah, germane.