╌>

For The First Time In American History A President's Senior Staff Is Warning The Country Not To Re-elect Him

  

Category:  News & Politics

By:  john-russell  •  4 years ago  •  77 comments

For The First Time In American History A President's Senior Staff Is Warning The Country Not To Re-elect Him


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  author  JohnRussell    4 years ago

Never before have so many people who worked in an administration openly advocated that administration be thrown out of office at the next opportunity.  

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
1.1  Krishna  replied to  JohnRussell @1    4 years ago

Excellent Video! jrSmiley_2_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  author  JohnRussell    4 years ago
@aravosis
·
4m
Trump is now threatening to not help Pennsylvanians in any future disasters.
Quote Tweet
fQrin-BI_normal.jpg
Daniel Dale
@ddale8
· 21h
Trump warns PA's governor that he won't forget how Wolf supposedly made it hard for him to secure a rally venue: "I'll remember it, Tom. I'm gonna remember it, Tom. 'Hello, Mr. President, this is Governor Wolf, I need help, I need help.' You know what? These people are bad."
 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3  Just Jim NC TttH    4 years ago

Starting the day with a misleading article title? 

"For The First Time In American History A President's Senior Staff Is Warning The Country Not To Re-Elect Him"

Funny thing is, every damned one of them are "FORMER"............but nice try John. Even Twitter and Facebook would have to caution readers................because a lot of people wouldn't get past the headline if this were a MSM story.....

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3    4 years ago

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    4 years ago

Political video of the year. 

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
3.1.3  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.1    4 years ago
Political video of the year.

That was fabulous!  

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3    4 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.3  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3    4 years ago
"For The First Time In American History A President's Senior Staff Is Warning The Country Not To Re-Elect Him"

The article title is taken DIRECTLY from the You Tube video. You have no argument. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.3.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @3.3    4 years ago
The article title is taken DIRECTLY from the You Tube video. You have no argument.

Then your vision of it being directly from the video means squat. It is misleading as they are NOT "administration officials" any longer. Spin it any way you like. It's your article. But the title and your extrapolation of it, are false.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.3.2  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.3.1    4 years ago

We are not going to argue about semantics. These people have been in senior positions in the Trump administration and they say their interactions with the president and their knowledge of what he is like show he should not be re-elected.  I don't care what dates they were or were not in the administration, and neither do the people who made the video.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.3.3  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @3.3.2    4 years ago
I don't care what dates they were or were not in the administration, and neither do the people who made the video.

Wouldn't expect you OR them to "feel" any differently.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.3.4  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @3.3    4 years ago
"You have no argument."
He never does.  Just goes from post to post and states - another misleading title, etc., etc.
 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
3.3.5  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.3.1    4 years ago
But the title and your extrapolation of it, are false.

My.  Big.  Butt.  Whether you like it or not, they were all inner-circle people who resigned because they could not support a president who showed such little disregard for the people of this country and the Constitution.    

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.3.6  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @3.3.5    4 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.3.7  Dulay  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.3.1    4 years ago
Then your vision of it being directly from the video means squat. It is misleading as they are NOT "administration officials" any longer. Spin it any way you like. It's your article. But the title and your extrapolation of it, are false.

That's pretty hypocritical since YOUR 'vision of it' is quit misleading. Where did you get the "administration officials" QUOTE come from Jim? That looks like a false quote to me. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.3.8  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Dulay @3.3.7    4 years ago

What about "A President's Senior Staff" in the headline didn't you understand? Makes it sound to me like they are presently his staff. And they aren't. Anything else to say?

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.3.9  Dulay  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.3.8    4 years ago
What about "A President's Senior Staff" in the headline didn't you understand?

What about the use of quotation marks don't YOU understand? 

What about "A President's Senior Staff" and "administration officials" being TWO distinct terms don't you understand? 

If you're going to incessantly whine about the accuracy of a title, I'd suggest you refrain from attributing terms that don't exist in the title. 

Makes it sound to me like they are presently his staff. And they aren't. Anything else to say?

Sure Jim, how about you address the content of the seed instead of whining about it's title? 

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.3.10  cjcold  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.3.1    4 years ago

So the fact that everybody who has ever worked for Trump finds him to be scum-of-the-earth doesn't change your slavish devotion to him? Sounds like fanaticism.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
3.3.11  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  JohnRussell @3.3.2    4 years ago

Would it not be fair to say, if the many persons who have disparaged Trump who once worked in his administration, got to know him, what he did, what he was, and because they disagreed with him were either fired or left on their own in disgust?  When it is so many, how can it be ignored, or even criticized, that they are no longer there?

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
3.3.12  Krishna  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.3.8    4 years ago
What about "A President's Senior Staff" in the headline didn't you understand? Makes it sound to me like they are presently his staff. And they aren't. Anything else to say?

This is becoming boring. 

Actually is becoming a common tactic when some is losing an argument and tries, in vain, to derail a discussion.

I wonder...perhaps we should contact Perrie and add something to the CoC making it an offense to be extremely boring. 

(OK to be boring once or twice in a row...being moderately boring is no real problem. But to obsessively post variations of the same boring no-value stuff really starts to bring down level of discussion...)

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3.4  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3    4 years ago

Yeah John, they are just part of the mountain of FORMER DISGRUNTLED staff.  They’re all LOSERS that Trump hired but they just couldn’t keep up with the aggressive pace of Trump’s winning. jrSmiley_42_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.4.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.4    4 years ago

No one used that "winning" line after his first year because the truth was settling in. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3.4.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  JohnRussell @3.4.1    4 years ago

Yeah but Ruth Bader Ginsburg just died.  That was a Trump win right?  The guy is so full of himself that he probably sees it that way.  Her dying before the election was result of all his hard work praying for it to happen.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3.5  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3    4 years ago

Just two letters for the misleading title and article. BS!)

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.6  Ozzwald  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3    4 years ago
Funny thing is, every damned one of them are " FORMER "

His "best people" are against him.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.6.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Ozzwald @3.6    4 years ago

I'm sure somewhere in there there is a point relevant to the article...........care to share YOUR take?

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3.6.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.6.1    4 years ago

"I'm sure somewhere in there there is a point relevant to the article...."

Or not.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.6.3  Ozzwald  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.6.1    4 years ago
I'm sure somewhere in there there is a point relevant to the article...........care to share YOUR take?

Trump's "best people" (in Trump's own words) are the ones coming out against him.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.6.4  Tessylo  replied to  Ozzwald @3.6.3    4 years ago

Sounds like rats deserting a sinking ship . . . too little, too late . . .

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.6.5  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Ozzwald @3.6.3    4 years ago

Because the proved him wrong. They weren't the best people and it showed

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.6.6  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.6.1    4 years ago
I'm sure somewhere in there there is a point relevant to the article...........care to share YOUR take?

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.6.7  Ender  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.6.5    4 years ago

So you are saying donald has bad judgement when it comes to picking staffers?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.6.8  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.6.5    4 years ago

"They weren't the best people and it showed"

LOL!  Just like the 'president'

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
3.6.9  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Ender @3.6.7    4 years ago
So you are saying donald has bad judgement when it comes to picking staffers?

How can that be true? He hired Stormy Daniels to work on his staff...

Perhaps it would be better to simply call them all fluffers since that's the only job they perform anymore, they don't work for the American people as most previous administrations have done.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.6.10  Ozzwald  replied to  Ender @3.6.7    4 years ago

So you are saying donald has bad judgement when it comes to picking staffers?

Not just bad, horrible!  Just look at how many he has gone through.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.6.11  Tessylo  replied to  Ozzwald @3.6.10    4 years ago

They have a revolving door in the now White trash House.  

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.6.12  Ozzwald  replied to  Tessylo @3.6.11    4 years ago
They have a revolving door in the now White trash House. 

Yup, he ran out of relatives to hire, and the only other ones that will take the jobs are so incompetent that they couldn't get a well paying job otherwise, or are lobbyists that just want to trash their opposing departments.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
3.6.13  Krishna  replied to  Ozzwald @3.6    4 years ago
President Donald Trump Promised He’d Only Hire ‘The Best People.’ Did He?

I remember that well...

He says that because he's smarter than everyone else..and extremely humble as well! jrSmiley_9_smiley_image.gif

Don't believe me? Well, ask Trump himself!

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
3.7  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3    4 years ago

Have ever this many 'Former' members of A PRESIDENTS SENIOR STAFF warned the country NOT TO VOTE to Re-Elect a president...?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.8  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3    4 years ago

Who died and made you moderator?

I don't appreciate and I think I can speak for some others, that we don't appreciate you going from article to article and saying - another misleading title, etc., etc., etc.  

Glad I could help . . . . 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.8.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @3.8    4 years ago

Helped absolutely nothing. I calls 'em like I sees 'em. [deleted/meta]

Flocking to dog whistles isn't my thing.

[deleted / no value]

It's red meat dog whistle crap. Is it so hard to type "Trump administration" instead of just "Trump"? Only for the TDS ridden anti-Trumpers that eat this crap up. .

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.8.2  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.8.1    4 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.8.3  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.8.1    4 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.8.4  Ender  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.8.1    4 years ago

What I would call TDS is trying to say the donald administration is separate from donald....

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.8.5  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Ender @3.8.4    4 years ago

Wouldn't expect anything less from you Ender.......................

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.8.6  Ender  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.8.5    4 years ago

I am not the one saying that...I am not the one claiming the presidents administration has nothing to do with him....

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.8.8  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Ender @3.8.6    4 years ago
I am not the one claiming the presidents administration has nothing to do with him....

All I am saying is, that this is going on and there is a good possibility he hasn't been briefed on the proposed action until they have their ducks in a row and he is ready to make a yay or nay determination at such time as that is the case.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.8.9  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.8.8    4 years ago

Riiiiiiigggghhhhhtttttt!

You act like the 'president' gives a shit about anyone but himself.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.8.10  Tessylo  replied to  Kathleen @3.8.7    4 years ago
"Agreed.. you have the right to voice your opinion just like others do."

No one said he didn't.  No matter how wrong he is, every single time.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.8.11  Ender  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.8.8    4 years ago

You know not everything works that way. Departments can implement policy without it having to go over his desk for a signature.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.8.12  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.8.1    4 years ago
"And I don't have a fuck to give what you and your "others" think."
Right back at ya dear!
 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.8.13  Ender  replied to  Tessylo @3.8.10    4 years ago

Funny thing about that free speech thing. It does not make someone immune from dissenting opinion.

 
 
 
JaneDoe
Sophomore Silent
3.8.15  JaneDoe  replied to  Kathleen @3.8.14    4 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.8.16  Tessylo  replied to  Kathleen @3.8.14    4 years ago

Where did I say that dear?  That Jim wasn't entitled to his opinion, no matter how wrong he is, every time?

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3.8.18  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Kathleen @3.8.14    4 years ago

Of course they do, just as long as everybody else's view exactly mirrors theirs! Otherwise they are all absolutely wrong!😁

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
3.8.19  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Kathleen @3.8.7    4 years ago
hall we say... colorful words.

i read that

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
3.8.20  Krishna  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.8.1    4 years ago
Helped absolutely nothing. I calls 'em like I sees 'em. [deleted/meta]

Flocking to dog whistles isn't my thing.

[deleted / no value]

Just a suggestion-- if you keep on breaking the rules, people will start finding your comments less and less valuable...and eventually start tuning you out.

IMO it would be helpful to you to "play by the rules". Why not try it for a while, I bet you'd find people would pay more attention to what you say...and probably even to respect you! jrSmiley_2_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
3.8.21  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Krishna @3.8.20    4 years ago

They were valuable at one time?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4  Tessylo    4 years ago

I guess some don't mind others' dirty  mouths, some say, unfuckwithable, and fuck all the time.

But no problem.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tessylo @4    4 years ago
unfuckwithable,

lol...that one got thrown at me a couple of times

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1    4 years ago

Such a badass!  jrSmiley_80_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.2  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @4    4 years ago

Like these gems?...............

He is a total fuck up.

The 'president' didn't do shit.  He fucks up everything his tiny little hands touch

Just like this fucking moron 'president' disbanding the Pandemic Response Unit.

this incompetent fucking moron 'president' is doing/has done everything possible to fuck up the handling of this deadly virus. 

The second photo, what the fuck is that?

Agreed, I have zero fucks to give regarding her. 

Again, what the fuck does that have to do with what I said?

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
4.2.2  Gsquared  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.2    4 years ago
Like these gems?...............

He is a total fuck up.

The 'president' didn't do shit.  He fucks up everything his tiny little hands touch

Just like this fucking moron 'president' disbanding the Pandemic Response Unit.

this incompetent fucking moron 'president' is doing/has done everything possible to fuck up the handling of this deadly virus. 

Yes.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.2.3  Tessylo  replied to  Gsquared @4.2.2    4 years ago

Truth hurts doesn't it Jim?

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
4.2.4  Krishna  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.2    4 years ago
The 'president' didn't do shit.  He fucks up everything his tiny little hands touch

Fuck! I fucking agree with much of what you fucking said-- god damnit!

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.2.5  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @4.2.3    4 years ago

Has nothing at all to do with truth. Just opinion. Please reread number 4. Thank you.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.2.6  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.2.5    4 years ago

Truth.

You're wrong again.  

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.2.7  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @4.2.6    4 years ago

Wasn't the subject I responded to. Do please try again. Thanks

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
5  cjcold    4 years ago

Anybody who watched the 60 minutes interview knows that Trump is an ignorant lying fool.

Anybody who watched Sunday football knows the KC Chiefs might just repeat.

I enjoy speaking truths.

 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
5.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  cjcold @5    4 years ago

Truth, like presidential election polls, are highly subjective.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
5.1.1  Gsquared  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @5.1    4 years ago
Truth, like presidential election polls, are highly subjective.

Only if you believe that "alternative facts" are real facts.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
5.1.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Gsquared @5.1.1    4 years ago

Nice deflection there.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
5.1.3  Gsquared  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @5.1.2    4 years ago

Deflection?

Nah, germane.

 
 

Who is online

Kavika


92 visitors