Q Anon Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor-Greene , On Radio Show, Addresses Criticism Of Her
Seb Gorka is one of those cartoonish figures that darted in and out of the Trump presidency show like characters in a sitcom. He played the blustering buffoonish 'expert' on intelligence and foreign policy who liked to pontificate about all the radical leftists who were trying to destroy America 24/7. Now he evidently has a daily radio show out there somewhere in Trumpworld, and yesterday his guest was the Q Anon congresswoman, Marjorie Taylor-Greene. The conversation lasted about 20 minutes, which as far as I can tell because I pretty much skipped through it trying to find something interesting, but the vast majority of it is Taylor-Greene and Gorka attacking the media and "the swamp" and not worth listening to. Marjorie Taylor Greene considers herself to be the victim in all this, along with her beloved President Trump and that is most of what she drones on about for 20 minutes.
However, there is a portion where Gorka askes her to address the criticism of her concerning conspiracies and he even lists some of the untrue things she has said and gives her the chance to explain herself.
Skip to the 1:20 mark, and listen to appx the 5:00 mark. This is over 3 uninterrupted minutes where Greene talks rapid fire about herself and why she is in Congress, while barely mentioning the conspiracy controversy at all. She briefly alludes to things she said on Facebook but directly suggests it was all no big deal. Gorka never asks her if she would like to apologize for saying Nancy Pelosi could be dealt with by a bullet in the head.
related
Tags
Who is online
450 visitors
She kinda balances out Maxine Waters when it comes to opposing extremes of nuttiness.
This radio interview was completely dishonest. Seriously, there isnt an honest sentence in this entire 20 minute interview.
I'm not bothered by this because I don't spend all my waking hours watching any of these shit shows.
"I'm not bothered by this because I don't spend all my waking hours watching any of these shit shows."
Neither does anyone else - it's a RADIO show.
Actually some of these shows also appear on You Tube so you could watch it, although considering the content and the fact that the visual consists entirely of someone sitting behind a desk and a microphone, I'm not sure why anyone would want to. Maybe the You Tube version is for people who don't have radios.
I get that. What's all that shit on the shelves behind Nazi Gorka?
Kevin McCarthy met with Green for over an hour , not sure if it was last night or this morning, but the report I heard said nothing was decided as to how to go forward in how to deal with this lunatic being in Congress.
That's why he ran to the former occupant of the White House to get his orders - telling that whackjob to keep up the good work.
McCarthy will cave to the conspiracy heavy Trumpists..... Bet money on it!
He wants to be House Speaker so badly.
being a guest on a radio show, syndicated across dominionist owned broadcast networks, where the neo-nazi host sells sugar pills and investment scams to the gullible is very fitting. gorka, hewitt, prager, and levin are all unapologetic trumpster propagandists that deserve severe and permanent punishment.
Sounds like typical far right wing whackjob radio, America First . . . . .
in the later stages of the interview, Taylor Greene calls the upcoming Trump impeachment trial a "freak show" and a "circus" which begs the question of just how un- self aware she is.
She's a freak show who encouraged/enabled/incited that, if you could call it that, circus, on the Capitol on 1/6/21
Why so much hysteria over this lady? Even if she is a bit of nut, she's not the only one in Congress you can say that about. And some of the others have been there for years. This lady has been in Congress for what? A month? People keep talking like action must be taken. It doesn't seem like she's had to time to actually do anything that requires an active response.
[Deleted]
[Deleted]
Which others have openly and directly encouraged violence against members of Congress?
Did she? I don't know. I'm not really following her. That's why I ask questions. Instead of answers, though, I usually get a bunch of shitty insults.
Then what the fuck are you doing, making comments about something you just said you know nothing about???????
You didn't ask a question, you made a statement. You stated that there were others like her in Congress. You can tell it was a statement because you finished with a period.
[deleted]
Yes, a statement...!
I didn't address your question, I questioned your statement.
Mine WAS a simple, 1 sentence question.
Again, I don't care about your question, I am asking you to support your statement.
No, what you care about is clear. It's also clear that you can't answer the question.
Says the person who is squirming violently trying to avoid the original question posed to them.
Try sticking with reality. The original posed question came from me, not you. And the day I fucking squirm for you?
Give me a fuckin break.
Let's see. My question to you was 5.2, your 1st question to me is 5.2.1.
Why do you lie when we just have to scroll up a little to see that it is a lie?
My first question was @5. Your 5.2 was supposed to be a response to that, but you didn't answer the questions I posed.
Furthermore, my 5.2.1 was a question asking for more information, which I needed before I could respond to 5.2.
So why don't you scroll up a little further to see how wrong you are.
Why do you refuse to read anything I say? Go look at 5.2.4 and come back to this conversation. That way you can catch up.
See 5.2.9. Again.
A 'bit of a nut'? She's deadly dangerous. I'm curious what your day job is - spin doctor?
[deleted]
IMO Americans are being fed so much biased shit by the media and especially from the internet sites that they can no longer tell the difference between what is right and what is wrong. Bless the First Amendment for that. It will be argued, most likely successfully that all of Trump's accusations of voter fraud and stolen election and trying to change the results of the Georgia votes are protected free speech when they surely are what led to the planning of and insurrection on January 6th.