McDaniel throws uncle under the bus
The Republican National Committee ( RNC ) is a U.S. political committee that assists the Republican Party of the United States . It is responsible for developing and promoting the Republican brand and political platform , as well as assisting in fundraising and election strategy.
After Mitt Romney, Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski announced that they would support Biden Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson for senate confirmation, far right flamethrower Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene said in a tweet that the three Republican senators were "pro-pedophile".
Frankly, no one expected anything better from Greene. But what is a little more interesting is the silence about this coming from an official body of the Republican Party, the RNC . The Republican National Committee is after all led by Ronna McDaniel who is also Mitt Romney's niece.
McDaniel, however, knows that she cannot afford to upset the "base" of her party. The base of her party is not Mitt Romney or Collins or Murkowski, the base is MTG, Gaetz, Boebert, Madison Cawthorn, Jim Jordan, Donald Trump, and other whackadoodles on the far right.
Her fear of their displeasure "trumped" her obligation as a party leader to condemn Greene's reckless words about her uncle.
Tags
Who is online
408 visitors
More evidence that the Republican Party has lost it's moral moorings.
Are you saying being against pedophiles and child pornographers is now immoral? I knew the left was going down hill I just never realized how far before.
The left do love their criminals; even if those criminals physically love young kids and babies.
And baby eating. Don’t forget about the baby eating.
Against pedophiles, but pro-Gaetz?
Witness Can Confirm Matt Gaetz Was Told He Had Sex With a Minor
Matt Gaetz’s Wingman Claims the Congressman Paid for Sex With a 17-Year-Old
Both Democrats and Republicans and every member of the supreme court whether liberal or conservative are against pedophiles and child pornographers. Only half wits and complete dip shit partisan morons would claim anything different.
The partisan attacks during the confirmation from many Republican senators were motivated by one thing and one thing only as the seed points out:
They are beholden to clearly mentally stunted right wing conservative bigots who hold their party hostage. They don't really think Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson supports or protects pedophiles, and three republicans had enough backbone to admit it, the rest are just as spineless as the rest of the party, slithering on their bellies in an effort to appease the rabid Trump supporters they know they need to stay in power. It's almost sad that these clearly mentally handicapped sycophants don't realize they are being used by politicians who do not share their same level of delusion.
Wasn't aware that they have degenerated to that degree but if you say so.
The "attacks" that were you claim that the Republicans made were based on Jackson's actual record. Did you say anything about the unfair and false attacks by the democrats during the hearings for Justice Thomas or Justice Kavanaugh!
That could be accurately said of the democrats who normally play follow the leader even if it leads them and the country right over the cliff. The Republicans do not nearly follow in lockstep with each other like the democrats do.
The Republicans do not nearly follow in lockstep with each other like the democrats do.
Her record was fine, she did what all good judges have done, looked at each case individually taking in all circumstances presented by the prosecution and defense and she followed sentencing guidelines. To claim she was "soft" on pedophiles is nothing but horse shit conservative opinion of someone trying to Monday morning quarterback cases they know nothing about.
I don't recall anyone accusing Judge Brown of sexual assault or some sexist behavior. Justice Thomas and Kavanaugh had believable accusers, just because a bunch of dipshit conservatives want to fantasize that the accusers were somehow manufactured or proven liars isn't my problem. Personally, I believe the accusers, the stuff Anita Hill accused Thomas of doing were just to fucking weird for her to have just invented them.
So on one hand you have actual accusers coming forward and were willing to sit in front of the US Senate and be grilled for their personal claims against a nominee, and on the other hand you have Republicans nit picking sentencing of a very well qualified Judge with no salacious accusations against her. It's like comparing apples and orangutans.
Must be why neither one of the is on the Supreme court and are serving time in prison. Oh! Wait!
Neither of that accusers were credible. In the case of Kavanaugh, even the accusers own friends could not back up her story.
Why is it that when democrats are accused of sexual offensive., The left always call the accusers liars and bimbos even when there is credible evidence but when Republicans are accused the women are automatically telli the truth and should be canonized as saints.
Got any more of that good smoke?
“To claim she was "soft" on pedophiles is nothing but horse shit conservative opinion of someone trying to Monday morning quarterback cases they know nothing about.”
’pedophiles’… simply “Q” it up.
How anyone can buy into such idiocy is beyond the pale and does nothing but continue a downward spiral of conspiracy and consternation.
Now you know how conservatives felt during the Kavanaugh hearing, which was nothing more than a Democratic shitshow.
“Now you know how conservatives felt during the Kavanaugh hearing, which was nothing more than a Democratic shitshow.”
And how does either example of partisanship make us better?
Four people actually gave your ridiculous comment a "like". LOL.
Greene said Romney, Collins, and Murkowski are "pro-pedophile". Based on what?
How do you like your babies? I like them roasted with butter, lemon, and pepper
Has to be slow roasted. I am also a garlic fan.
I forgot the garlic, rosemary, and sage. I roast them like I do a roasting hen
Let's look at 2 politicians, 1 democrat and 1 republican that refuse to walk in lock step.
Joe Manchin and Liz Cheney.
What punishment has the democratic leadership enacted against Manchin? He has now, multiple times, thwarted democratic initiatives. What punishment has he received?
Now let's look at Liz Cheney, she cast a vote for the impeachment of Trump after looking at all the evidence.
All because she refused to walk lock step with what GOP leadership told her to do.
Actually a pressure cooker will provide the same degree of tenderness in a fraction of the time.
But you don't get that crispy skin
Flame kissed with a cool red center, please.
Isn't that what Palestinians accuse Jews of?
Where did I say anything about them?.
Mine has a sauté feature...
That's gonna leave a mark.
Awww, did they say bad things about poor Joe? That is sooo much the same thing...
Where are the charges?
In the case of Kavanaugh, even the accusers own friends could not back up her story.
There is a difference between 'could not back up her story', and being 'unable to remember that particular party', which was the actual wording used in court.
You've got to pressure cook them in oil like Kentucky Fried Chicken does to get the most tender and delicious results
being 'unable to remember that particular party', which was the actual wording used in court.
Lol.. Leland Keyser believed the story wasn't true and felt it didn't make any sense. Wouldn't you remember your good friend being assaulted?
She also was pressured to change her story and lie by Ford's friends. But keep clinging to a story told by a liar, that changed constantly, wasn't specific to time and place and involved varying amounts of people and relied on pressuring witnesses to try and make it seem credible. Threatening to publicly denounce someone as an addict if they don't change their story isn't necessary when you have a credible allegation. .
Ford's as credible as the QANON pizzeria story.
Lol.. Sure claiming Kavanaugh led a rape gang in high school based on the word of the disgraced con man Michael Avenetti and his client was "believable"
The lies Democrats tell themselves about their own behavior.
didn't claim it did. just pointing it out.
So pedophiles are okay with you as long as they haven't been charged yet? That is a disgusting attitude.
You left out several damn details about Liz- which is typical leftist BS.
Liz Cheney is a TDS driven wack job that has repeatedly stated her sole purpose for serving is to do "Whatever it takes to prevent 2024 Trump win".
She also accepted an appointment to the Jan 6th committee from Nancy Pelosi. She was not appointed by Republican leadership. That automatically disqualifies her as being a Republican. Maybe she should beg Pelosi to join the Democrats?
Also, Manchin has been harassed by far left morons for his resistance to the Democrat "spend until we all drop" platform. The party leadership has been silent about the harassment.
How about a trade? TDS driven Cheney for Manchin. Republicans would take that deal any day. I am sure Democrats being the "Big tent" party can find room for Cheney./S
If that were true then neither would be sitting on the Supreme Court. How does that happen? Oh, that's right, because neither were believable accusers. Just distractions and lambs for the sacrifice.
Why hasn't he been charged yet? If there is all this evidence you are claiming?
Democrats are long on unsubstantiated allegations and short on charges.
I’d trade away Mitt to get Manchin…
Has she figured out what a woman is yet?
I would have answered that a woman is someone with two X chromosomes, but that definition fails to account for those with an X and Y chromosome but self-identify as a woman.
“Has she figured out what a woman is yet?”
Wondering what your definition may entail?
You can't lose what you never had to begin with.
She threw her uncle under the bus and backed it up over him a few times before this.
More important than a tweeting a retort will be support in 2024 reelection campaign. Is the RNC backing someone to run against Mitt in the primary?
Good! She should do it again and again.