╌>

RNC Speaker Supports Household Voting - One Vote Per Family, And The Man Decides | Michael Stone

  
Via:  Trout Giggles  •  4 years ago  •  73 comments

By:   pdxprogressiveX (Progressive Secular Humanist)

RNC Speaker Supports Household Voting - One Vote Per Family, And The Man Decides | Michael Stone
Patriarchy Abby: Catholic extremist and anti-abortion fanatic Abby Johnson, one of the Republican National Convention's top speakers, supports household

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show


I would support bringing back household voting…Each household would get one vote… the husband would get the final say.

Oh...lovely. My husband isn't even registered to vote. This could cause a major problem in my household


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



August 25, 2020 by Michael Stone RNC Speaker Supports Household Voting - One Vote Per Family, And The Man

Patriarchy Abby: Catholic extremist and anti-abortion fanatic Abby Johnson, one of the Republican National Convention's top speakers, supports household voting - one vote per family, with the man of the house making the final decision.

On Twitter Johnson said:


I would support bringing back household voting…Each household would get one vote… the husband would get the final say.

In addition to being a dangerous religious extremist who believes women are second-class citizens who should be denied access to reproductive health care in the form of abortion, and the right to vote, Johnson is also a racist who once claimed her "brown son" should be racially profiled by police.

In a recent video the deplorable Johnson said:


Statistically, my brown son is more likely to commit a violent offense over my white sons.

More from the video:


Statistically, I look at our prison population and I see that there is a disproportionately high number of African-American males in our prison population for crimes, particularly for violent crimes. So statistically, when a police officer sees a brown man like my Jude walking down the road — as opposed to my white nerdy kids, my white nerdy men walking down the road — because of the statistics that he knows in his head, that these police officers know in their head, they're going to know that statistically my brown son is more likely to commit a violent offense over my white sons.
So the fact that in his head, he would be more careful around my brown son than my white son, that doesn't actually make me angry. That makes that police officer smart, because of statistics.

Johnson's remarks are ignorant and racist, and one can only feel sympathy for her biracial son.

In the video Johnson did not acknowledge systemic racism, instead, she blames black men for being bad fathers:


I believe the primary reason that we see a lot of the illness in our society today and one of the reasons that we're seeing a lot of what's happening today in our society is because of fatherlessness, because fathers have not stood up and they have not taken their place in the home and particularly in Black homes.

In short, Abby Johnson is not only an anti-abortion conservative religious extremist, she is also a racist promoting sexist, patriarchal non-sense.

And that's why she will be on stage as a top speaker at the Republican National Convention.

Bottom line: Catholic extremist and anti-abortion fanatic Abby Johnson, one of the Republican National Convention's top speakers, supports "household voting" - one vote per family, with the man of the house making the final decision.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Trout Giggles    4 years ago
Statistically, I look at our prison population and I see that there is a disproportionately high number of African-American males in our prison population for crimes, particularly for violent crimes. So statistically, when a police officer sees a brown man like my Jude walking down the road — as opposed to my white nerdy kids, my white nerdy men walking down the road — because of the statistics that he knows in his head, that these police officers know in their head, they're going to know that statistically my brown son is more likely to commit a violent offense over my white sons.

Seriously, Lady? I hope you love your brown son as much as you love your white, nerdy, kids

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
2  Paula Bartholomew    4 years ago

"Fuck you lady!" (Kidnapped girl in Demolition Man)

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3  Tessylo    4 years ago

Why isn't this dumb bitch barefoot and pregnant and why is she working outside the home?

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.1  evilone  replied to  Tessylo @3    4 years ago

This is why I think they are just full of shit. Were she really to think this way she wouldn't be up there speaking. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.2  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tessylo @3    4 years ago

Good question. Maybe it's more "do as I say, not as I do"

I have a question about this woman. If she has white kids and one brown kid, is that kid a product of her loins or is he adopted? Adopted makes sense because ya know....if she's such a devout Catholic...divorce is not an option, unless of course her first husband died. But that's not exactly how it comes out in the seed

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.3  devangelical  replied to  Tessylo @3    4 years ago

nice of her husband to let her up off her back, put shoes on her, and send her out to read the speech he wrote.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.3.1  JBB  replied to  devangelical @3.3    4 years ago

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
4  PJ    4 years ago

I'm all for her adopting this voting formula.  I actually encourage all trump supporters to follow this practice and the rest of us will follow the Constitution.

I'm always curious about women who give away their basic rights to a man.  Whatever works for her but she doesn't get to tell the rest of us to give up our rights.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  PJ @4    4 years ago
I actually encourage all trump supporters to follow this practice and the rest of us will follow the Constitution.

Wouldn't it be nice if those who whined and complained about things like entitlements, abortion or or their desired Christian patriarchy would just live their desires, no one is stopping them. If they don't want their own vote and only want their husband to vote for them, then so be it. If they don't like entitlements then don't use them, no one is forcing them to accept Medicare benefits or social security. If they don't like abortion, then don't get one.

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
4.1.1  PJ  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4.1    4 years ago

What's the point if they can't force their choices on others.  That's what religion is all about.  jrSmiley_68_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
4.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  PJ @4    4 years ago

When I got married, I had the part about obeying removed.  I told him that if he wants something to obey him, get a dog.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
4.3  Gordy327  replied to  PJ @4    4 years ago
I'm always curious about women who give away their basic rights to a man.

Indeed. The same thing is seen when a woman wants abortion rights removed. It's either a (probable) religious indoctrination or self-hating mentality that causes some to think that way.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
5  Kavika     4 years ago

The whole administration is bat shit crazy.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
5.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  Kavika @5    4 years ago
The whole administration is bat shit crazy.

Sounds about right... 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6  seeder  Trout Giggles    4 years ago

This is interesting:

Johnson revealed in January 2011 that she had two abortions herself before the birth of her daughter. [8] She lives in Texas with her husband Doug [2] and seven children. [20]

I'm still researching her family life. I love the hypocrites who have had abortions and then become virulently anti-choice.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Trout Giggles @6    4 years ago

He biracial son is adopted.

Her husband is a stay at home dad. I find that ironic

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
6.1.1  PJ  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1    4 years ago

I'm waiting for you to uncover the sister-wives.......

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
6.1.2  Kavika   replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1    4 years ago
Her husband is a stay at home dad.

Perhaps she wears the pants in the family. 

You can play off that all-day long.jrSmiley_7_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.3  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  PJ @6.1.1    4 years ago

They're devout Catholics. Mistresses are ok but extra wives are frowned upon

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.4  Tessylo  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1.3    4 years ago

Another phonier than though small c christian.  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.5  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.4    4 years ago

Hey! She did her part! She had 8 kids!

Eight little parishioners to add to the collection plate on Sunday

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
6.1.6  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1.5    4 years ago

Here, I just thought she was a cow.  It would see than she is a brood mare instead.

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
6.2  PJ  replied to  Trout Giggles @6    4 years ago

Ah.....now it's making sense.  The worst hypocrites are the ones that used to do it but have seen the light.  Some become extremists. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.3  Tessylo  replied to  Trout Giggles @6    4 years ago

There's stories about those kind of women all the time, outside the abortion clinics protesting, having had an abortion themselves, but shrieking to the providers that their abortion is justified.  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.3.1  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tessylo @6.3    4 years ago

Anybody can justify anything even if it's not justifiable

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
6.3.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Tessylo @6.3    4 years ago
There's stories about those kind of women all the time, outside the abortion clinics protesting, having had an abortion themselves, but shrieking to the providers that their abortion is justified.

That's because their beliefs are for everyone else.  They, themselves, have different standards and moral codes.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
7  JBB    4 years ago

That is one way to fix the gop's woman problem...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
7.1  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  JBB @7    4 years ago

They wouldn't have problems if they would pull their heads out of their asses

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
7.1.1  JBB  replied to  Trout Giggles @7.1    4 years ago

Just so long as Mr Trout votes how you would?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
7.1.2  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  JBB @7.1.1    4 years ago

If he ever actually registered and then voted he could vote for the Coward in Chief for all I care. And he probably would. But he doesn't vote and he will never get to tell me who to vote for

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
7.1.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Trout Giggles @7.1    4 years ago
They wouldn't have problems if they would pull their heads out of their asses

Well, it's just that some look outward for solutions or their Lord and savior, others look inward... It's all about perspective.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
7.1.4  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @7.1.3    4 years ago
It's all about perspective.

that made me giggle

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
8  Ender    4 years ago

Disgusting nasty...

Not even mentioning her other absurd comments, that she would actually say that about a child in her care.

I hope child services looks into her nasty fat ass.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
8.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Ender @8    4 years ago
I hope child services looks into her nasty fat ass.

Her head seems lodged in there pretty good so I don't think there's room for anyone else to investigate it...

 
 
 
Account Deleted
Freshman Silent
9  Account Deleted    4 years ago
That makes that police officer smart, because of statistics.

Me thinks there is a flaw in that logic.

Let's create a model to test.

"Knowing" that African-American males are more likely to be charged with a crime than whites, the police officer only pulls over or stops-and-frisks African-American males .

Some of the  African-American males will have a weapon or drugs.

None of the white people will have weapons or drugs - 'cause they were not stopped and frisked.

Eventually the statistics would be overwhelming showing that only black people commit crimes. And of course our prisons would have only black inmates.

We now have our classic self-fulfilling statistical prophesy.

(Obviously all African-American males are not stopped and some white people are stopped .)

I like polls. I like all types of statistical data.

Ideally, the numbers do not lie but those collecting the numbers can intentionally, or unintentionally, cause those numbers to misrepresent reality.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.1  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Account Deleted @9    4 years ago

What are those circle charts called?

Your theory would present a very interesting chart

 
 
 
Account Deleted
Freshman Silent
9.1.1  Account Deleted  replied to  Trout Giggles @9.1    4 years ago
What are those circle charts called?

Venn diagrams.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.1.2  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Account Deleted @9.1.1    4 years ago

That's it! I knew you would know what they are called

 
 
 
Account Deleted
Freshman Silent
9.1.3  Account Deleted  replied to  Trout Giggles @9.1.2    4 years ago

Busted.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Guide
9.2  Dulay  replied to  Account Deleted @9    4 years ago

All one need do is remove race from the equation to guarantee their immediate outcry against this practice.

Statistically, the overwhelming majority of violent crime is committed by males between the age of 17 and 34. By her standard, all of those that meet that criteria are suspect and should rightly be profiled. 

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
10  lady in black    4 years ago

Fuck this cunt, I hate using that word but it fits this delusional anti-women poor excuse for a human being...I'm a widow so no vote for me.  

 
 
 
Freefaller
Professor Quiet
10.1  Freefaller  replied to  lady in black @10    4 years ago
I'm a widow so no vote for me.  

Lol don't be silly, obviously in your circumstance your father, brother, son or possibly court appointed male representative would have the final say

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
10.2  Bob Nelson  replied to  lady in black @10    4 years ago
I'm a widow so no vote for me.

Well... Of course not! 

Would you allow children to vote? 

 
 
 
Account Deleted
Freshman Silent
11  Account Deleted    4 years ago
one vote per family, with the man of the house making the final decision.

Do you think  Kellyanne Conway is a big fan of Johnson?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
11.1  devangelical  replied to  Account Deleted @11    4 years ago
Do you think  Kellyanne Conway is a big fan of Johnson?

johnsons, plural...

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
12  Gsquared    4 years ago

The Republican Party has gone over the brink.  The insanity is palpable.  They are a clear and present danger.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
13  Tessylo    4 years ago

118477790_3355319521199912_8464811606608248768_o.jpg?_nc_cat=1&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=8W8xzb308F8AX9I6DHm&_nc_ht=scontent-iad3-1.xx&oh=ee987e30d16e9509bddd2c17d405c900&oe=5F6D8C8A

Sorry for the off topic post TG.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
13.1  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tessylo @13    4 years ago

Your link is not showing on this browser. I will have to go to Chrome to see it.

Be back later....it's lunchtime

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
13.2  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tessylo @13    4 years ago

LOL!

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
13.3  Ozzwald  replied to  Tessylo @13    4 years ago
Sorry for the off topic post TG.

2 observations.

  1. Melania looks better in the uniform.
  2. Castro looks happier.
 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
13.4  PJ  replied to  Tessylo @13    4 years ago

OMG!  I was thinking the exact same thing last night when I watched her.  I am totally not kidding.  It struck me odd that she went with an outfit that looked more camo then the typcial colors that most wear to conventions to represent the USA.  Almost a nod to he who must not be named.  

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
14  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom    4 years ago

I forgot this lady ever existed.  She was the gal who earned disciplinary action at her job with Planned Parenthood because she revealed information she gathered from her co-workers personnel files to an employee of another Planned Parenthood location.  It wasn't her first disciplinary matter, and a report was added to her own personnel file.  As an act of revenge, she decided to copy not only administrative files, but patient files as well, and then she passed them off to her local Planned Parenthood haters....who promptly showed her some lovin'. 

She also lied about witnessing an ultrasound of a 13-week fetus that was supposedly trying to 'fight off' an abortive procedure as it was being done.  Is there anyone in Donald Trump's sphere that is capable of honesty?

And here is the hubs at home with the kids.

Doug-Johnson-Podcast-Image-Fam-400x250.png

When has she had the time to hang out with The Donald?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
14.1  Tessylo  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @14    4 years ago

I saw her remarks about Planned Parenthood.  Lying bitch.  

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
14.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @14    4 years ago

I am reminded of a joke regarding the picture.

Two women were attending the funeral of an old friend.  They talked about how she had eight wonderful children with her first husband and seven more with her second husband.  Both husbands had also died.  One woman said "Isn't it nice that they are finally together again?"  The other asked "Do you mean with her husbands?"  The women replies "No, her legs."

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
15  Tessylo    4 years ago

118398087_3744616255550018_1586221018937613967_n.jpg?_nc_cat=110&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=2qvzs5clrocAX-ykmGs&_nc_oc=AQn7y_qiUAnhi3pf4vwqE6wiIgxpXozeKZC2FahbHr4g9Mbxh4eIGtwnqvNFc2ns9pI&_nc_ht=scontent-iad3-1.xx&oh=1bbe9e6db78c71360903bb0aada245a8&oe=5F6DC0A0

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
15.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Tessylo @15    4 years ago

Endorsing shit products from the oval office definitely is.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
16  Tessylo    4 years ago

Telling people to boycott Goodyear because their employees are told not to wear anything promoting any party (I would imagine, not just tRumpturds).  

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
16.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Tessylo @16    4 years ago

I will only buy Goodyear products from now on.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
16.1.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @16.1    4 years ago

Boycotts often work that way - they cause a surge in defying the boycott. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
17  Bob Nelson    4 years ago

Welcome to 1790!

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
17.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Bob Nelson @17    4 years ago

Exactly.  I was going to say let's just go back a couple of centuries - Jane Austen's time would be pretty good, as long as I can be Mr. Darcy.  Got a horse?. 

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
18  Perrie Halpern R.A.    4 years ago

Hey Trout,

Is this a satire group, because if not, Lordy, god help us!

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
18.1  sandy-2021492  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @18    4 years ago

This is a satire group, but the article isn't satire, unfortunately.  Meet the new Phyllis Schlafly.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
18.1.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  sandy-2021492 @18.1    4 years ago
Meet the new Phyllis Schlafly.

Night of the Living Dead

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
18.1.2  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  sandy-2021492 @18.1    4 years ago

Sinners and Buttheads is my satire and irreverent NT group. The Reality Show is for my more serious stuff

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
18.1.3  sandy-2021492  replied to  Trout Giggles @18.1.2    4 years ago

I stand corrected.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
18.1.4  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  sandy-2021492 @18.1.3    4 years ago

I didn't mean to make that sound snarky. I apologize

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
18.1.5  sandy-2021492  replied to  Trout Giggles @18.1.4    4 years ago

You didn't. And if I sounded that way, I also didnt mean to. We're good?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
18.1.6  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  sandy-2021492 @18.1.5    4 years ago

Absolutely!

jrSmiley_93_smiley_image.jpg

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
18.2  Ender  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @18    4 years ago

When people that are Q supporters are winning primaries, we are farther gone than I thought.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
18.2.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Ender @18.2    4 years ago

I just watched part of the RNC convention speeches - made me sick to my stomach to hear so many lies and such praise for the man who totally fucked the USA, so I'll not bother wasting my time watching any more of it. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
18.2.2  Ender  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @18.2.1    4 years ago

It is all the trump show.

All lies, smears, attacks and if you notice, no policy.

The rnc is no longer what it was.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
18.3  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @18    4 years ago

No, it isn't. I wish it were tho because this is deeply disturbing

 
 

Who is online


Tacos!
Freefaller


588 visitors