╌>

Biden taps former rival Pete Buttigieg for U.S. Transportation secretary -sources | Reuters

  
Via:  Just Jim NC TttH  •  5 years ago  •  39 comments

By:   Jarrett Renshaw, David Shepardson (U. S.)

Biden taps former rival Pete Buttigieg for U.S. Transportation secretary -sources | Reuters
President-elect Joe Biden has tapped Pete Buttigieg to lead the U.S. Transportation Department, according to four people familiar with the matter, making him the first of Biden's Democratic rivals for the presidency to land a role in his Cabinet.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


By Jarrett Renshaw, David Shepardson WILMINGTON, Del. (Reuters) - President-elect Joe Biden has tapped Pete Buttigieg to lead the U.S. Transportation Department, according to four people familiar with the matter, making him the first of Biden's Democratic rivals for the presidency to land a role in his Cabinet. The appointment of Buttigieg, 38, is another step in a meteoric political rise for the former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, who showed surprising strength as a presidential candidate. If confirmed by the U.S. Senate, he would run a sprawling federal agency that oversees the nation's airlines, highways and transit systems. Buttigieg would also make history as the first LGBTQ person nominated to Biden's administration and, if confirmed, the first LGBTQ Cabinet secretary to be approved by the Senate. An announcement on his nomination is imminent, the people familiar with the matter said, asking for anonymity before a formal announcement. A spokesman for Biden's transition team did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A representative for Buttigieg also did not respond to a request for comment. Buttigieg had been rumored for several different spots in Biden's administration. He was surprisingly competitive during the Democratic Party primary, winning the first-in-the-nation caucuses in Iowa, showing formidable fundraising might and enjoying massive popularity on social media. Once Biden took control of the


visit seeded article for remaining content

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH    5 years ago

Ummmm. Okay.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
1.2  Jasper2529  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    5 years ago

Maybe he'll do better at this job than he did in South Bend when he ignored tens of thousands of potholes (except making sure that the road in front of his house was fixed and repaved).

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2  Vic Eldred    5 years ago

I guess the most important ingredient, as in all Biden appointments is this:

Buttigieg’s nomination is in line with Biden’s stated commitment to diversity in the Cabinet.

The other qualification, as far as I can see is Buttigieg's willingness to quickly bow out after Biden's South Carolina win. 

Republicans should not be expecting any good cabinet picks.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    5 years ago

why would the next 8 years be any different for R's than it was for everyone else the last 8 years.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.1  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @2.1    5 years ago

oops, last 4 years. I keep forgetting trump is a rarity, an impeached 1 term loser. "such as you've never seen before"

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    5 years ago

There haven’t been any good ones yet.  Well I guess he got his gay quota covered now.  Which interest or identity group is up next?  Diversity over all.  

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
2.2.1  Gsquared  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2    5 years ago

Some Trumpists would be much happier living in Russia where the philosophy and policies match their own.  

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.2.2  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2    5 years ago

Are you saying diversity is a bad thing?

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.2.4  Gordy327  replied to    5 years ago

I didn't say anything about diversity. I simply asked a question.  Your attempt to try to turn it around on me is obvious, as well as a dodge to the original question.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3  Hal A. Lujah    5 years ago

Poor Mitch won’t be able to steer exorbitantly large amounts of infrastructure money into his backwoods state now.  

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.1  Ender  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3    5 years ago

Doesn't his wife currently hold the job?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.1.1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Ender @3.1    5 years ago

Yes

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Ender @3.1    5 years ago

... when she's not spying for china ...

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
4  Sunshine    5 years ago

Haha.. love that pic.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
4.1  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Sunshine @4    5 years ago
Haha.. love that pic.

I wondered how long it would be before someone implied something.  I'm just surprised it was you.  

It's also not the original image in the Reuters article.  This is:

MW-IB304_biden0_20200302200344_ZQ.jpg?uuid=d45bda94-5cea-11ea-a3cb-9c8e992d421e

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
4.1.1  Sunshine  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @4.1    5 years ago

What it implies to me is the fakery Democrats are good at displaying.  For both pics.  But the first one is funnier.

Don’t project on me whatever you think it means.

I am surprised that you make baseless accusations too.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
4.1.2  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Sunshine @4.1.1    5 years ago

The first image was altered to suggest something that wasn't true.  That might be ok with you, but it's not ok with me.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.1.4  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @4.1.2    5 years ago

Look closer. It's virtually the same damned image as you just posted FFS.

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
4.1.6  Sunshine  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @4.1.2    5 years ago
That might be ok with you

Please don't drag me into your comments.  I never said anything about what the pic suggest for you.

Keep to your own opinions.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
4.1.7  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Sunshine @4.1.6    5 years ago
I never said anything about what the pic suggest

You didn't have to.  Your 'hahaha' made it clear.

Keep to your own opinions.

That's exactly what I have been doing.

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
4.1.8  Sunshine  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @4.1.7    5 years ago

Perhaps in your twisted mind it made it clear..I already told you what it meant to me.

So next time perhaps ask before making unfounded accusations.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
4.1.9  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.1.4    5 years ago
Look closer. It's virtually the same damned image as you just posted FFS.

I know baloney when I see it, so thank you for deleting the image you provided and posting the one from the article.  It was the right thing to do.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
4.1.10  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Sunshine @4.1.8    5 years ago
So next time perhaps ask before making unfounded accusations.

Thank you for your suggestion.  I'll take it under advisement.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.1.11  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @4.1.9    5 years ago

WTH are you talking about now?? The picture in the article above was gotten after looking at the original story. The fetch wasn't allowed to "fetch" the picture as it was because the source didn't allow it to so I hunted to find the same one elsewhere. I changed NOTHING. But thanks for the thanks...............I guess.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
4.1.13  1stwarrior  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @4.1    5 years ago

Jeezzz - just can't keep his hands to himself, can he???

And, how many other political careers have been shut down for "free hands"????

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5  Tacos!    5 years ago

Sure why not? Being mayor of a town of 100K qualifies you for . . . 

Gosh, I can't even finish the statement. I understand that cabinet appointments are political, but I'm still amazed when I see some of these nominations. 

I know Biden didn't invent this kind of thing, so I'm not even trying to criticize him specifically. Trump made me scratch my head, too. Are there cabinet positions where we expect/demand the Secretary actually have some expertise in the field? Defense, maybe. State?

Maybe expertise isn't required. Is it a purely political and bureaucratic job? Are there departments people just don't care about that much?

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
6  charger 383    5 years ago

I have heard he likes Amtrak, so he has one thing I like

 
 

Who is online

devangelical
Dismayed Patriot
Bob Nelson
Hallux
Tacos!


76 visitors