╌>

For Dems, 'blue wave' is now a trickle

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  vic-eldred  •  8 years ago  •  69 comments

 For Dems, 'blue wave' is now a trickle

capital-dome1.jpg


(CNN)   The ballot on Tuesday left off the biggest winners: President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who stepped in to stand up for and against certain candidates.

Republican candidates who embraced President Trump and his "drain the swamp" message came out on top in key Senate and congressional races in West Virginia, Ohio, Indiana and North Carolina, setting the stage for a strong field of GOP candidates heading into the general election in November.

Learning lessons from the past, the GOP is now determined to field a strong team of candidates heading into November. If the party bolsters this resolve with a strong economy and significant presidential foreign policy advancements, the GOP will be on solid ground. The Democrats may still pick up some seats, but the anticipated Blue Wave will be more like an uphill battle.






Trump didn't hold back in tweeting his approval Wednesday morning,  saying , "The Republican Party had a great night. Tremendous voter energy and excitement, and all candidates have a chance of winning in November."
In the crucial West Virginia Senate primary, Republican State Attorney General Patrick Morrisey pulled off an upset and scored a win for the party over Rep. Evan Jenkins and former inmate and coal baron Don Blankenship. Morrisey will take on incumbent Joe Manchin, one of the most centrist Democrats in the Senate, in November.
To say this roller-derby type race gave GOP leaders a little heartburn is an understatement. Morrisey and Jenkins were out early with a fierce primary fight. Blankenship got into the race late with a slew of controversial, racially insensitive comments   and a fierce attack   on McConnell, calling him "Cocaine Mitch," and claiming he created jobs for "China people."

West Virginia (which   Trump won   by 42 points in 2016) offers one of the best chances Republicans have to turn a blue state red in the 2018 midterms, and after the   disastrous mistake of nominating Roy Moore , who faced allegations of sexual abuse, in conservative stronghold Alabama, Republicans felt additional pressure to stop Blankenship in order to nominate a viable primary candidate heading into November.

Trump even used the bully pulpit of his Twitter feed to   discourage voters   from supporting Blankenship.
In the Indiana Senate GOP primary, businessman Mike Braun beat US Reps. Luke Messer and Todd Rokita in a heated primary battle. Given that Trump   won Indiana   in 2016 by 20 points, all three candidates positioned themselves as the most dedicated to Trump supporters.

Messer   wrote a letter   nominating Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize, while Rokita played up to the base by running an ad bashing the Mueller investigation as a "witch hunt." Braun, who will face incumbent Democratic Sen. Joe Donnelly in the fall, beat Messer and Rokita by depicting himself as an outsider businessman like Trump.

In the Ohio GOP primary, both Rep. Jim Renacci and businessman Mike Gibbons campaigned as the ultimate outsider candidate. Trump-backed Renacci focused on his disgust with Washington status quo. Trump   won Ohio   in 2016 by a much smaller margin than West Virginia or Indiana, and many say Trump's   endorsement   of Renacci, who will run against Sen. Sherrod Brown in the general election, was a key factor in his win.

In North Carolina, GOP Rep. Robert Pittenger became the   first incumbent   to lose in the 2018 primary cycle. Former Rev. Mark Harris of Charlotte's First Baptist Church beat Pittenger with his "drain the swamp" message, running against the GOP-controlled Congress as much as against Pittenger. Harris now prepares for a competitive general election race against Iraq War veteran Dan McCready.
The Democrats' anticipated Blue Wave was downgraded as voters backed strong candidates who can enable the GOP to hold and potentially expand its majority in the crucial midterm elections. As a footnote, it goes without saying that in this crazy world of politics, even losers win; at 12:01 a.m. Wednesday,  Blankenship's parole ended .  He said  he plans to head to a luxury resort to relax and play blackjack. The winning candidates are off to the races in November.


Alice Stewart

Alice Stewart

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/09/opinions/gop-wins-against-democrats-blue-wave-stewart-opinion/index.html











Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    8 years ago

I seldom seed an article from CNN, but this was one of those rare occasions. Thanks to the success of the Presidents policies & the over the top progressive hate, the once substantial lead the dems had going into the fall midterm election is all but gone!

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    8 years ago

It's a toss up right now and the Democrats are likely to lose a lot more support in the six months ahead.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    8 years ago

We can only imagine if the North Korean talks work out. That is only one of many good omens blowing in the wind

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.2  Split Personality  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    8 years ago

Link please...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Split Personality @1.2    8 years ago

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.2.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Split Personality @1.2    8 years ago

Here's another story expressing the same conclusion. The Democrats have shot their best wad and going nowhere. Reality sucks for them.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Quiet
1.3  KDMichigan  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    8 years ago

that is something I can't figure out. How did President Trump hurt you?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  KDMichigan @1.3    8 years ago

He never did...He's benefited me with tax cuts, deregulation and SECURITY

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
1.3.2  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Vic Eldred @1.3.1    8 years ago
He's benefited me with tax cuts, deregulation and SECURITY

Good for you , I guess. I'm a little more concerned about how the US government is going to meet it's financial obligations now. Since we were already spending more than we took in daily it seems we are even further behind taking in less revenue. Additionally we just increased spending by a fair amount.

Now I'm no billionaire and can't do billionaire math, but in my world when I dont have enough money coming in and then take a cut in pay I dont run out and spend a bunch of money buying a new house or car.

But I also have all I need and I never had to declare bankruptcy either so.....

.

As far as deregulations go. I was never regulated that I know of but I dont produce toxic chemicals or offer services or sell products that could harm maim or kill anyone. So...

And a unpredictable bully style president doesn't make me feel real secure either.

But it is America so, to each their own.

PS: And A Happy Mothers day to all. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3.3  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @1.3.2    8 years ago
I'm a little more concerned about how the US government is going to meet it's financial obligations now. Since we were already spending more than we took in daily it seems we are even further behind taking in less revenue.

When did you become a Conservative?

Now I'm no billionaire and can't do billionaire math, but in my world when I dont have enough money coming in and then take a cut in pay I dont run out and spend a bunch of money buying a new house or car.

Obviously you don't have to negotiate with democrats to set your budget

As far as deregulations go. I was never regulated that I know of but I dont produce toxic chemicals or offer services or sell products that could harm maim or kill anyone. So..

And it sounds like you never made many investments or started a business either.

And a unpredictable bully style president doesn't make me feel real secure either.

He supporting the police, thus like in the 1950's (as a youngster) I'm again sleeping soundly!

Happy Mother's Day!

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
1.3.4  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Vic Eldred @1.3.3    8 years ago
When did you become a Conservative?

1987

You ?

......................................................................................

LOL That would be fiscally conservative, other wise: 

I consider myself a pragmatist, realistically moderate, an independent and progressive Deist with both some conservative and liberal tendencies, {depending on the issue or subject.}

Hard to pigeon-hole that one. Drives me nuts sometimes, but I’m not. My mother had me tested.

.........................................................................................

I dont run out and spend a bunch of money buying a new house or car.

Obviously you don't have to negotiate with democrats to set your budget

True, But I also dont throw caution to the wind and accept unrealistic budgets for myself or I wouldn't have what I do have.

.........................................................................................

And it sounds like you never made many investments or started a business either.

Wrong, I still have investments and I'm glad they are regulated that makes them more safe. I also ran a business for years and saw the regulations as part of being a responsible business owner.                                           Did I like being "responsible? Could I have made more profit if I didn't follow the laws? No and yes. But I am not on this planet alone so I dealt with it..

................................................................................................

He supporting the police, thus like in the 1950's (as a youngster) I'm again sleeping soundly!

I have always worked and paid what I needed to to live in a nice home in a good neighborhood and never worried too much about my safety so I've always slept just fine.

..............................................................................................

I guess I'm just one of the millions of Americans who doesn't need trump to benefit me for me to feel good or safe in and about America or myself. I was doing fine before trump and expect to be doing the same after him.

PS: IMO America is and always has been a GREAT country, no campaign slogan erases that fact for me. America is what YOU make of it and our freedoms.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3.5  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @1.3.4    8 years ago
You ?

1968 at the height of the Vietnam War. I saw the protests, the drugs & the lifestyle and I found my ideology.

True, But I also dont throw caution to the wind and accept unrealistic budgets for myself or I wouldn't have what I do have.

Bravo. Unfortunately, for Republicans it was either make the deal with the devil or allow the military to continue it's downsizing. May they inherit a super majority in the Senate for the next budget!

Wrong, I still have investments and I'm glad they are regulated that makes them more safe. I also ran a business for years and saw the regulations as part of being a responsible business owner.       

I'm glad to hear it. Those days are over for me, I'm finally doing what I enjoy. You can't beat it!

I have always worked and paid what I needed to to live in a nice home in a good neighborhood and never worried too much about my safety so I've always slept just fine.

So it is for me as well. It is not so for everyone. It's a big country and politics isn't so personal

 IMO America is and always has been a GREAT country, no campaign slogan erases that fact for me. America is what YOU make of it and our freedoms.  

The slogan originated with Bill Clinton

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
1.3.6  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Vic Eldred @1.3.5    8 years ago
The slogan originated with Bill Clinton

OK I wasn't aware of that, did trump have anything original except his campaign insults and threats ? hell everyone offers grandiose promises so that was nothing new.

trumps political campaign tools: insults, grandiose promises, intimidation and threats... yep that about covers it.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3.7  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @1.3.6    8 years ago

You find Trump's personality flaws (and they are substantial) intolerable?

Ok, I don't like it either. I wish he wasn't that way, but I am more concerned with the direction of this nation. From what youv'e already told me, you don't seem to think much changes from one administration to another. That maybe true when we have some moderation coming from those in power. We certainly didn't have that during the 8 years of Obama. Strong medicine is now required

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.3.8  Greg Jones  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @1.3.2    8 years ago
I'm a little more concerned about how the US government is going to meet it's financial obligations now.

It's funny how Democrats never worry about the debt or deficits when they are in charge.
 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2  JBB    8 years ago

BIG WHOOP! Some republicans won republican primaries. Who did the gop think would win gop primaries?

There are damn good reasons why the once Grand Old Party of Lincoln is now known merely as ,"the gop"...

With deficits again reaching a trillion dollars a year and headed higher this economy is smoke and mirrors...

The rich are getting infinitely richer. The poor are getting poorer. And, the working class is being squeezed.

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Silent
2.1  Dean Moriarty  replied to  JBB @2    8 years ago

And the middle class are getting richer. That’s why the middle class is shrinking. It’s good news. We are living in a fantastic time of thriving economic opportunities. I see opportunities for financial gain everywhere I look. 

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
2.3  Rmando  replied to  JBB @2    8 years ago

Somebody sounds disappointed Blankenship wasn't nominated....

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.3.1  JBB  replied to  Rmando @2.3    8 years ago

I never mentioned Blankenship and could not care less what future losers the gop nominated...

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
2.3.4  Rmando  replied to  Tessylo @2.3.3    8 years ago

The Democrats were hoping for another Roy Moore to rub against Manchin. They know he's in trouble this year.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.4  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @2    8 years ago
With deficits again reaching a trillion dollars a year and headed higher this economy is smoke and mirrors...

And who is responsible for that?  To rebuild the military, which Obama deleted, we had to negotiate with democrats - they wanted all the usual entitlement spending added! BTW as far as deficits go, the unconstrained spending, deficits, debts and domestic ambition of the Obama administration left the government nearly $20 Trillion in debt when he finally left office!

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.4.1  JBB  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.4    8 years ago
Who is responsible for that? (Federal Deficits Exploding To A Trillion Dollars and Still Expanding)

The damn gop in Congress for passing irresponsible tax cuts exploding the deficit and Trump for signing them.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.4.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.4    8 years ago
To rebuild the military, which Obama deleted

Has the military budget dropped under Obama, and if so, who is to blame?

Overall spending on national security includes the Pentagon budget as well as spending by other agencies, such as the Energy Department’s work on nuclear weapons. Spending increased in 2010 and 2011, but it has fallen every year for four years since then by a cumulative 15 percent.

Other ways of looking at the question show declines as well. National security spending made up 20.1 percent of the federal budget in 2010, but in 2015 it was 15.9 percent. Over the same period, spending fell from 4.6 percent of gross domestic product to 3.3 percent.

There are two main reasons for the spending drop. The first is the Obama administration’s decision to start removing U.S. troops from Iraq and Afghanistan. The second has to do with a process known as sequestration.

Sequestration refers to the framework for automatic, across-the-board cuts to both military and non-military spending that were originally designed to force bipartisan negotiators in Congress to strike a deal in 2011. When negotiations fell apart, the cuts went into effect.

The bipartisan nature of the sequestration provision means that both parties merit a share of the blame, experts say.

The most recent Obama budget proposed a 7.8 percent increase in the base Defense Department budget between 2015 and 2016 . The spending bill enacted this fall puts the defense budget on a path to start growing in fiscal year 2016, up about 6 percent from the previous year.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.4.3  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @2.4.1    8 years ago

Are you on the record now for balanced budgets?

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.4.4  JBB  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.4.3    8 years ago

Yes, during times of relative economic prosperity. I have always maintained for fiscal responsibility and balanced budgets except when the country is experiencing a recession. Big deficits are coming again and that is fiscally irresponsible and bad tax policy. My sensible responsible approach would never ever include massive irresponsible tax cuts for rich individuals and big multinational corporations such as the gop has instuted and Trump signed which will inevitably result in hugly ballooning deficits and massive increases to our national debt irresponsibly during times of relative economic well-being such as we have been experiencing for many years now after the fiasco of Bush's Great Recession. Economics is just math" as Bill Clinton keeps reminding us and we will never and cannot ever balance our budget or pay off our national debt by irresponsibly slashing our government's income in order to give huge windfalls to the already incredibly rich and to big corporate interests. So, again, yes do and always have supported balancing the under the appropriate economic conditions but not by moving that burden from the wealth and big corporations onto the working poor and the middle class. Deficit spending is required to stimulate economies experiencing significant recessions though. We are not experiencing a recession and have not for eight years and so the current deficits and blowing up the debt while the economy is totally irresponsible, is the cause of the current economic bubble and will result in another economic recession except this time we will not have things like tax cuts, interest rate cuts and increased spending to depend upon to pull us out of the next recession because those things are being done in extreme during good economic times. BUBBLE BUBBLE BUBBLE. Expect it to BURST! No government has ever or will ever be rewarded long term for rampant fiscal irresponsibility and that is what the gop and Donald Trump are giving us in spades a/k/a Trump Cards...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.4.5  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.4.2    8 years ago

Such a defense of Obama! We know about sequestration and how & why it came into use, but the fact is that cuts to the military under Obama were both unprecedented in size and drastic in nature. Both of Obama's Defense Secretaries (Panetta & Gates) complained endlessly about it. Obama cut 40,000 men from the Army. Obama actually vetoed a budget in 2015 that did not contain military cuts. Obama famously said "I want a dollar in domestic spending for every dollar in military spending. An approach Congressional democrats continued in that last budget "deal". In 2012 the Defense Strategic Guideline announced that the United States would no longer be able to fight two major regional conflicts simultaneously.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.4.6  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @2.4.4    8 years ago
Yes, during times of relative economic prosperity. I have always maintained for fiscal responsibility and balanced budgets except when the country is experiencing a recession.

Well, I guess that conveniently covers Obama and his $20 Trillion debt. So, you say the Republicans should have threw their hands up and said no budget since we cant get an agreement? 
Sorry, I guess I'm not quite buying any of it

No government has ever or will ever be rewarded long term for rampant fiscal irresponsibility and that is what the gop and Donald Trump are giving us in spades a/k/a Trump Cards...

And you know damn right well, Trump didn't want any of that pork in there! For people who remember every word he says, you quickly forgot him saying he would veto another budget like it


 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.4.7  JBB  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.4.6    8 years ago
I'm not quite buying any of it

You are denying MATH. Our debt and deficit are ballooning due to the gop's irresponsible tax and spending policies.

Practically overnight our deficit doubled under the gop's budget. You cannot blame completely out of power Dems...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.4.9  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @2.4.7    8 years ago

Where did I deny that?  What I am denying is that progressives ever cared about it. In this past budget it was they who demanded more domestic spending in return for allowing the military to be rescued. You seem to have crawled all around that simple fact.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.4.10  JBB  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.4.9    8 years ago

The only one crawling around facts is you trying to shift blame for our exploding deficits to out of power Democrats...

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.4.11  JBB  replied to    8 years ago

During Obama's terms our deficts dropped by two thirds from a trillion and a half to half a trillion.

They are exploding due to the fiscal irresponsibility of the gop and the gop alone this time round...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.4.12  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @2.4.10    8 years ago

They may be the minority party in Congress, but they are NOT without power! They are absolutely to blame! To any objective mind - no concession no budget!  It takes at least 60 votes in the Senate to pass a budget, which obviously means the democrats have plenty of power!

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.4.13  JBB  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.4.12    8 years ago

Plainly you want to only focus on the spending side of the equation but that is not why our deficit is blowing up...

Our currently exploding deficit is entirely the fault of the gop's and Trump's math denying irresponsible tax policy.

Without the gop's tax cuts our projected deficit would be half what it is going to be and it will just keep growing...

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
2.4.14  Rmando  replied to  JBB @2.4.13    8 years ago

If you want lower defecits then starve the beast. Quit supporting pet projects and pork like Chuck Schummers tunnel or all the fraud and waste in the social programs that the left ignores.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.4.15  JBB  replied to  Rmando @2.4.14    8 years ago

Starve the Beast is RW bullshit. It hurts the working poor. Balance the budget by taxing the rich and big corporations.

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
2.4.17  Rmando  replied to  JBB @2.4.15    8 years ago

The rich and big business don't pay taxes. They just find tax shelters and raise the costs on their goods and cut wages. That's what hurts the working poor.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.4.18  Greg Jones  replied to  JBB @2.4.15    8 years ago
Balance the budget by taxing the rich and big corporations.

Are you serious? There aren't enough of the "rich" and corporations don't pay taxes anyway...these simply pass them on as higher prices for goods and services.
You really don't have any idea how it all works, do you?? Face Palm

 
 
 
DRHunk
Freshman Silent
2.4.19  DRHunk  replied to  Greg Jones @2.4.18    8 years ago

That's a fallacy, business can only raise prices as high as demand allows. A lot of products are already at peak retail and consumers are already starting to shift their spending habits.  At some point corps will and have in the past not been able to shift all of the burden down.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.4.20  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @2.4.13    8 years ago
Without the gop's tax cuts our projected deficit would be half what it is going to be and it will just keep growing...

Even if you were right the tax cut, which only kicked in about a month ago, is not yet part of any deficit. Furthermore, the great Economist, Art Laffer would strongly disagree. And he is not alone nor are tax cuts spurring economic growth a secret:

"High taxes, sometimes by diminishing the consumption of the taxed commodities, and sometimes by encouraging smuggling, frequently afford a smaller revenue to government than what might be drawn from more modest taxes "......Adam Smith.."The Wealth of Nations"

And how did those tax cuts do in April?

The Congressional Budget Office is reporting that the federal government took in $515 billion in April.  With outlays of only $218 billion, the $190-billion surplus represents the largest in history.

What's more, the CBO said the surplus is $40 billion more than expected.



Read more:   

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.5  Greg Jones  replied to  JBB @2    8 years ago
The rich are getting infinitely richer. The poor are getting poorer. And, the working class is being squeezed.

Nope, the poor are working harder and getting more for the efforts, and don't have time to worry about the so called rich. Unemployment is about as low as it has ever been.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.5.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Greg Jones @2.5    8 years ago

Such ignorant comments contaminate this site daily. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.5.2  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @2.5.1    8 years ago

So, please explain in detail where I am wrong. You still believe in a cerulean tsunami apparently!  LOL

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
2.5.3  A. Macarthur  replied to  Greg Jones @2.5    8 years ago
Unemployment is about as low as it has ever been.
So, please explain in detail where I am wrong. You still believe in a cerulean tsunami apparently!   LOL
OK. Here goes.

The dazzling US unemployment rate is hiding a gloomier reality

May 04, 2018

The US unemployment rate dipped to 3.9% in April, after hovering at 4.1% for the last six months. That’s the lowest it’s been in 18 years. This  would  seem to be a sign of improving prospects for US workers—if not for a couple of wrinkles.

First off, there’s the reason unemployment dropped: Because Americans are dropping out of the workforce, as opposed to an increase in the number of workers with jobs, as  Dean Baker , economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, points out. Rather than adding workers, the American labor force shed 236,000 people between March and April.

This iframe is not allowed

Labor force participation, which measures the share of the working-age population that is either employed or looking for work, actually ticked down for the second month in a row.

This signals that there’s more slack in the US labor market than the unemployment rate indicates.

There’s also scanty evidence that paycheck growth is accelerating; the average hourly wage rose a mere $0.04 in April. And the share of people unemployed because they voluntarily quit their jobs is still considerably less than it was in 2000, the last time the unemployment rate hit 3.9%. People tend to be willing to leave their jobs when they’re sure they can easily find another. In April, around 12.7% of unemployed Americans had voluntarily quit, as opposed to 14% or more back in 2000. “This suggests that, in spite of the low unemployment rate, workers are still not confident about their labor market prospects,” writes Baker.

_____________________________________________________________

Glad you asked .

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
2.5.4  A. Macarthur  replied to  A. Macarthur @2.5.3    8 years ago
Unemployment is about as low as it has ever been.
So, please explain in detail where I am wrong. You still believe in a cerulean tsunami apparently!  LOL

Glad you asked .

Some of you boys have the annoying habit of making pronouncements (without any specifics to back them up … then, when you're challenged on the accuracy of those pronouncements, you ask for the challenger(s) to prove that you are wrong … and mock those who challenge you with childish cartoons … like Makes No Sense  and LOL  !

And I must say, that sequence is precisely how Trump does it … he makes a false claim with the voice of "authority," and when he's handed his lying ass, he calls the reality … "fake news," and mocks his challengers.

When you don't know what you don't know, don't think you won't be confronted … 

 
 

Who is online


87 visitors