╌>

Trump beat Hillary more than a year ago but the left can't let it go – and it's harming our country

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  heartland-american  •  8 years ago  •  122 comments

Trump beat Hillary more than a year ago but the left can't let it go – and it's harming our country

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



After the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed his razor-thin defeat in the 2000 presidential election, former Vice President Al Gore could have gone to the mat trying to delegitimize the presidency of George W. Bush. Much to his credit, he didn’t.

Democrat Gore had won the popular vote, after all, and the turmoil created by the historic 36-day recount in Florida was all he needed to divide the country for selfish and ideological reasons. But instead of orchestrating a radical leftist resistance, Gore chose country over power.

As difficult as it must have been, Gore was big enough to let it go, accept his loss, and recognize that Republican Bush was the legitimate president of the United States.

In a constitutional republic like ours, every two years there are winners and losers at the ballot box. After a rigorous debate and exchange of ideas, “We the People” make the ultimate decision about who will do the governing until the next election.

Historically, the party that loses the previous election licks its wounds, reboots its message and works with the majority party on issues where common ground can be found. This recipe that is the American miracle has worked remarkably well for 230 years – until now.

Now there’s a permanent Democratic obstruction campaign in Washington and a radical socialist resistance across the country. What’s driving this?

Never before in American history have disgruntled leaders of the minority party sought to deligimitmize and bring down a duly elected president of the United States.

It’s been over 20 months since President Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in the historic election of November 2016, but the left will not let it go and it’s doing great damage to our country.

From twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to former CIA Director John Brennan to actor Robert DeNiro to fake news, deranged leftists are determined to try to bring down a presidency. Their attacks are based on a false narrative and they don’t care if they tank our country and system of government in the process.

Just this past weekend, Hillary Clinton continued to question President Trump’s allegiance to America while speaking about his recent meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Clinton pushed the centerpiece of the Democratic agenda – Russia – when she disingenuously asked her audience: “Why didn’t he (Trump) stand up for our country? In this case it doesn’t seem like our president cares. He’s trying to be friends with Putin for reasons we are all trying to figure out.”

Hillary Clinton is a lot of things. She’s dishonest; she’s the embodiment of entrenched power and the failed Washington status quo; and of course, she’s crooked. However, one thing she’s not is stupid.

Clinton knows full well that Christopher Steele’s phony dossier is a steaming pile of political crap because she paid for the opposition research herself. She also knows that her cronies in the Obama administration pushed the fake dossier through official intelligence, diplomatic and law enforcement channels because a President Hillary Clinton would have rewarded the swamp creatures handsomely.

This is why Brennan and his deep state ilk are running around labeling the leader of the free world a traitor – just because President Trump ruined Hillary’s coronation and swept them all from power.

Clinton also knows that she started her service as Obama’s secretary of state with the failed Russia “reset” in an effort to improve relations between our two countries. She spent four years cozying up to Russia in search of a foreign policy success to hang her hat on and to line her husband’s pockets and the Clinton Foundation with Russian cash.

Hillary relies on her allies in the anti-Trump media to gloss over that wrinkle in their concocted narrative. But the resistance doesn’t stop with her political and media pals. She’s also got Hollywood in full war mode.

The once-respected actor Robert DeNiro goes ballistic and screams “f--- Trump!” at a televised award ceremony. Wealthy comedian Bill Maher waxes on about how great an economic recession would be for Democratic chances to retake power – ignoring the fact that a recession would hurt millions of hardworking American families.

These and other Trump-haters make it clear that the left is united in its effort to get rid of President Trump – no matter what.

Unfortunately for the agenda-less liberals, the Trump economy is on fire and this Friday’s report on the gross domestic product will confirm what the American people already know: President Trump’s pro-growth economic program is working and the results are exceeding all expectations.

It’s a dangerous game being played by national Democratic leaders and it’s not without consequences. Whether it’s turning their backs on our police and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, or attempting to provoke a war with Russia, the Democrats have become totally unhinged.

Will any adults in the Democratic Party show some leadership and say it’s time to move past 2016 once and for all? Or will they continue their sad and destructive decline into Third World chaos and socialism?

Make no mistake, Hillary Clinton is fueling the resistance and encouraging others to join in because she can’t get over losing, despite the fact that she pledged to accept the results of the election. It’s still all about Hillary – America be damned.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    8 years ago
Historically, the party that loses the previous election licks its wounds, reboots its message and works with the majority party on issues where common ground can be found. This recipe that is the American miracle has worked remarkably well for 230 years – until now.

Now there’s a permanent Democratic obstruction campaign in Washington and a radical socialist resistance across the country. What’s driving this?

Never before in American history have disgruntled leaders of the minority party sought to deligimitmize and bring down a duly elected president of the United States.

It’s been over 20 months since President Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in the historic election of November 2016, but the left will not let it go and it’s doing great damage to our country.

From twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to former CIA Director John Brennan to actor Robert DeNiro to fake news, deranged leftists are determined to try to bring down a presidency. Their attacks are based on a false narrative and they don’t care if they tank our country and system of government in the process.

It seems we are about to receive a non stop bombardment of bamboozling from the right. 

I will tell you what is fueling the "resistance" to Donald trump, but first let me say that the author of this "opinion" piece, David Bossie,  is a buddy and confidante of the alt right and a Trump insider. He is not remotely a honest pundit or journalist. In other words, this piece is literally propaganda from state run media (Fox News). 

About Bossie -

  • GOP’s shady partisan hit man: How dirty trickster David ...

    https:// www.salon.com /2014/10/28/gops_best_partisan_hit_man_how...

    Oct 28, 2014  · David Bossie (AP/Evan Vucci) GOP’s shady partisan hit man: How dirty trickster David Bossie is ruining politics David Bossie isn’t famous, but his shady work in the trenches is altering democracy — and there’s more to come

  • The Incomparable Chutzpah Of David Bossie , Failed Dirty ...

    www.nationalmemo.com/...of- david - bossie -failed- dirty -trickster

    David Bossie lacks the skill and style of a ... The Incomparable Chutzpah Of David Bossie , Failed Dirty ... Smart politics and smart living delivered to your ...

  • Meet David Bossie, Donald Trump's New Master of Dirty …

    https:// www.thewrap.com / meet-david-bossie-donald-trumps -new-master...

    When Donald Trump announced that veteran conservative operative David Bossie would be his deputy campaign manager, he called him “a friend of mine for many years” who “loves politics , knows how to win.” Those comments to the Washington Post may be true. But Bossie has also been accused ...

  • Meet the GOP’s Shady Partisan Hit Man: How Dirty …

    https:// www.alternet.org /meet-gops-shady-partisan-hit-man-how...

    Meet the GOP’s Shady Partisan Hit Man: How Dirty Trickster David Bossie Is Ruining Politics

    ======================================================

    Donald Trump is being met with resistance because he is the most unqualified and disqualified presidential candidate in history. The fact that he won the electoral college vote does not change an iota of that. 

    The idea that people who love this country would just say "oh he won, let's move on" , at the time of the election or at any time since is laughable. Trump will NEVER be accepted. If that pinches Bossie's shorts, so be it. 

    We havent seen anything yet.  Wait until the laws close in on him. 

 
 
 
The Magic 8 Ball
Masters Quiet
3  The Magic 8 Ball    8 years ago
And It's Harming Our Country

I disagree with this premise.

they are doing all the same things they did before trump won

and guess what? trump still won.  (which has been good for our country)

 all the left is doing now?  is making sure trump gets re-elected. how can that be bad?

I encourage them to continue :)

no one with any sense listened to the left before the election and it is very unlikely they will suddenly start now.

bs2.jpg

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Silent
4  bbl-1    8 years ago

Actually Trump did not beat Hillary.  A flawed electoral process aided by foreign 'investments' altered the direction of the nation.

The real question is this.  Is Donald Trump an enigma, a mistake or simply a 'real Manchurian Candidate?'

Harm to our country?  For one thing, more coal ash into the streams and environment is not good for our country.  And there are more things too.  Americans should be especially proud that now seeking safety or asylum in our nation is a crime and the government can seize children without recompense.  Wrap the flag around that. 

 
 
 
The Magic 8 Ball
Masters Quiet
4.1  The Magic 8 Ball  replied to  bbl-1 @4    8 years ago
A flawed electoral process aided by foreign 'investments' altered the direction of the nation.

 complete bs..  but very funny indeed  :)

here is a hint:

the electoral college worked as designed and russia did not change any votes.

what altered the direction of our nation?  finally, enough people of this country got fed up with +60yrs of politicians selling us out from both sides of the isle. now? the jig is up.  that +60yr old paradigm has been crushed and there is no comeback on the schedule.

cheers :)

 
 
 
The Magic 8 Ball
Masters Quiet
4.1.2  The Magic 8 Ball  replied to  Texan1211 @4.1.1    8 years ago

LOL

I remember all the way back to when hillary wanted to end illegal immigration.

cracks me up  :)

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
4.1.3  PJ  replied to  The Magic 8 Ball @4.1.2    8 years ago

What "cracks me up" is that some people don't know the difference between racism and inhumane practices -vs- strengthening and fixing policies.

 
 
 
The Magic 8 Ball
Masters Quiet
4.1.4  The Magic 8 Ball  replied to  PJ @4.1.3    8 years ago

as long as your having fun with that?  enjoy :)

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.5  Ozzwald  replied to  The Magic 8 Ball @4.1.2    8 years ago
I remember all the way back to when hillary wanted to end illegal immigration.

Doesn't Trump also want to end illegal immigration?  Isn't that one of his famous incoherent rants?

 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
4.1.6  sixpick  replied to  Texan1211 @4.1.1    8 years ago
Remember the good old days when some Democrats believed that failure to accept the results of an election were dangerous and a threat to democracy?

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/LpzfdC8HGP4/maxresdefault.jpg

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
4.1.7  96WS6  replied to  sixpick @4.1.6    8 years ago

Hell.  I remember less than 2 years ago they were basically calling everyone insinuating the election would be unfair bat shit crazy and were being lead by none other than BO himself LMFAOOOOOO!.  Funny how they do a 180 as soon as they start losing their shit isn't it?

They also knew about Russian interference in BOTH CHAMPAGNES and didn't do a thing about it.  I think they thought it wasn't a problem.  Hell after giving them all that Uranium they probably thought they were on the DNC's side LMAO!

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
4.2  arkpdx  replied to  bbl-1 @4    8 years ago

Actually Trump did not beat Hillary.

Actually according to the Constitution and the laws of the land and the rules governing the election of the president he most certainly did beat Hillary and rather handily. No matter how much you try to deny it that is the fact .

 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
4.2.1  sixpick  replied to  arkpdx @4.2    8 years ago
Actually Trump did not beat Hillary.
Actually according to the Constitution and the laws of the land and the rules governing the election of the president he most certainly did beat Hillary and rather handily. No matter how much you try to deny it that is the fact .

I've already explained that to bb1, but the response I received back was incoherent.  I can't even say it was ignorant because it was like my explanation was printed in white ink on the comment.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
4.5  Jasper2529  replied to  bbl-1 @4    8 years ago
Actually Trump did not beat Hillary.  A flawed electoral process aided by foreign 'investments' altered the direction of the nation.

That's one of the most hilarious comments I've read on social media!  LOL

Trump didn't beat Hillary? The EC process is "flawed"? Since when?

Newsflash - the Electoral College has existed for a lonnnnnng time and it only became "flawed" in some people's minds after Hillary lost in 2016.   

As the article states ... 

  • even Al Gore accepted his EC defeat.
  • Hillary and DNC paid for the bogus "dossier" that was designed to link Trump to imaginary Russian "collusion".
  • You can look up the phony FISA requests for yourself.

The 2016 legitimate, duly-elected POTUS is Donald J. Trump. PERIOD. 

 
 
 
tomwcraig
Junior Silent
4.5.1  tomwcraig  replied to  Jasper2529 @4.5    8 years ago

And, this wasn't the first time that the loser had more popular votes than EC votes.  The first was John Quincy Adams over Andrew Jackson:

 
 
 
tomwcraig
Junior Silent
4.5.2  tomwcraig  replied to  tomwcraig @4.5.1    8 years ago

And, Andrew Jackson's loss to John Quincy Adams is still the largest percentage margin for the winner of the popular vote to lose the EC.  No one complained then about the EC not following the desire of the people.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
4.5.3  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  tomwcraig @4.5.2    8 years ago
No one complained then............

Got a link ?

 
 
 
tomwcraig
Junior Silent
4.5.4  tomwcraig  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @4.5.3    8 years ago

You look for links from 1824.  The best you will find is possibly microfiche from then in the public library.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
4.5.6  Jasper2529  replied to  tomwcraig @4.5.1    8 years ago

And  4.5.2     tomwcraig

From your link:

The  Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution  provides the procedure by which the  President  and  Vice President  are elected, which is through the  Electoral College , so the national popular vote does not determine the outcome of the United States presidential election.

The 12th Amendment was ratified over 214 years ago in June 1804. I truly don't understand why so many people insist on remaining ignorant and are still whining about Hillary's EC loss. 

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
4.5.7  Jasper2529  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @4.5.3    8 years ago
Got a link ?

The "links" are archived newspapers from the 1800s, so you'll have to scroll through hundreds of them. We didn't have Internet in the 19th century.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
4.5.8  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  tomwcraig @4.5.4    8 years ago
You look for links from 1824.

What ? Why me ? You are the person who stated "No one complained back then", I just wanted to know for sure you knew what you were talking about considering I doubt you were alive at the time so, I figured you had links.

lol

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
4.5.9  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Jasper2529 @4.5.7    8 years ago
The "links" are archived newspapers from the 1800s, so you'll have to scroll through hundreds of them.

No kidding that's about what I thought, So I found it funny someone was citing info from centuries ago to make their point when no one even alive knows the attitude from that time on the subject at hand. I figured perhaps they really had a link to back them up. 

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
4.5.10  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Texan1211 @4.5.5    8 years ago
BEFORE your beloved Abuela lost.  I suggest you win lots more elections and then petition for a Constitutional Amendment to change what you don't like.

...LOL.... I guess everyone is just so used to us all belonging and supporting one party or the other. As an independent I cant stand either party or most of the people they put forth to have control over me. 

I say take the damn big money out of our elections and give this land back to the masses. 

 
 
 
tomwcraig
Junior Silent
4.5.12  tomwcraig  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @4.5.3    8 years ago

There is a reason no one complained.  The EC didn’t elect anyone in that election.  It was the House that voted in John Quincy Adams: 

 
 
 
Old Hermit
Sophomore Silent
4.5.13  Old Hermit  replied to  tomwcraig @4.5.12    8 years ago
There is a reason no one complained.  The EC didn’t elect anyone in that election.  It was the House that voted in John Quincy Adams: 

.

As noted, the EC was not used to elect Adams, a House vote was, so that part of the original statement was misleading however the second part, ( No one complained then about the EC not following the desire of the people . ), is also incorrect since Adams victory became know historically as "The Corrupt Bargain" .

In the 1824 election, without an absolute majority in the Electoral College, the 12th Amendment dictated that the Presidential election be sent to the House of Representatives, whose Speaker and candidate in his own right, Henry Clay, gave his support to John Quincy Adams, and was then selected to be his Secretary of State.

.

4.5.2 tomwcraig And, Andrew Jackson's loss to John Quincy Adams is still the largest percentage margin for the winner of the popular vote to lose the EC.  No one complained then about the EC not following the desire of the people.

.

So the Presidential election of 1824 was not decided by the EC and the results were so highly detested at the time that the win became an historical bench mark for outrage,kind of like Whitewater or Iran-Contra or "The Corrupt Bargain!".

I guess other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the play!?

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
4.6  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  bbl-1 @4    8 years ago

Oh waahhh! Trump won fair and square so just deal with it and move on!!!! Better luck in 2020.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
5  Bob Nelson    8 years ago

1) "The left" does not exist. There is no equivalent to the standardization found on the right, metronomed by Fox News.

2) Leftish media have pretty much forgotten about Hillary. Last year's news.

3) Rightish media, as relayed here on NT by the Usual Suspects, runs stories about Hillary every day.

So... other than having everything wrong, the seed is not too bad...

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Silent
5.1  Dean Moriarty  replied to  Bob Nelson @5    8 years ago

Yeah check out these recent Hillary stories and no this is not right wing media. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
5.1.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  Dean Moriarty @5.1    8 years ago

These are reporting. When a former Presidential candidate speaks on current events, the media report.

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Silent
5.1.2  Dean Moriarty  replied to  Bob Nelson @5.1.1    8 years ago

Where’s the reporting on Gary Johnson? 

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Silent
5.1.5  Dean Moriarty  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.3    8 years ago

Leftists have no idea who he is or what he’s doing because MSM is still busy fluffing Hillary. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
5.1.6  Bob Nelson  replied to  Dean Moriarty @5.1.2    8 years ago
Where’s the reporting on Gary Johnson?

Who?

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
5.1.7  Jasper2529  replied to  Dean Moriarty @5.1.2    8 years ago

Bases loaded home run!

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
5.1.16  Jasper2529  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.9    8 years ago
I know who the loser Gary Johnson is. 

If you know who he is, why did you ask in comment  5.1.3  :

Who is Gary Johnson?
 
 
 
LynneA
Freshman Silent
5.1.19  LynneA  replied to  Dean Moriarty @5.1.2    8 years ago

Believe Weld would have elevated the Libertarian message...Johnson blew it on the campaign trail displaying lack of knowledge regarding foreign issues.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
5.1.22  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Dean Moriarty @5.1.2    8 years ago

I know exactly who Gary Johnson is as I voted for him for president. I kind of wish he had won.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
5.1.23  Jasper2529  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.18    8 years ago
Ever heard of sarcasm?

Of course I have, Tessy. I must have not seen the /sarc tag on your comment. Oh, wait ... there wasn't one.   Laugh

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
5.1.24  Jasper2529  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.9    8 years ago
What's Aleppo?

You don't know? Ask Gary Johnson because he's had 2+ years to learn all about it.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.1.25  Ronin2  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.9    8 years ago

Aleppo is a place we shouldn't even care about; except for Obama/Hillary's moronic plan to destabilize yet another country and remove a Russian ally.  Things in Syria are definitely better off since Obama and Hillary stuck their noses where they didn't belong.

Kind of like Bush with Iraq and Obama with Libya.  Saddam & Gaddafi were evil brutal dictators; but remove them and what comes after them is far, far, worse. You cannot force democracy on a country that has never know it- it has to be their decision; and happen within their time frame.

Things could be worse. Force a no fly zone over Syria, and bomb all air fields, in Syria Hillary could be in charge. She who never met a military confrontation she didn't like (armchair warrior syndrome), seems to forget that Russia and China have ships anchored in Syrian waters, and planes using Syrian airfields and sharing Syrian skies.

But WWIII would look good on her resume; and she would ensure being the last POTUS ever. 

 
 
 
lib50
Professor Silent
5.1.26  lib50  replied to  Jasper2529 @5.1.23    8 years ago
there wasn't one.

It wasn't needed by those in the know. 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
5.3  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Bob Nelson @5    8 years ago

Denial is a terrible thing...

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
5.3.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @5.3    8 years ago

 It's sad to be so lacking in ideas as to need to use those of the opposition.

 
 
 
lib50
Professor Silent
5.3.2  lib50  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @5.3    8 years ago
Denial is a terrible thing...

No kidding, we see it every day when the base believes what Trump tells them to believe, regardless of what they see and hear. I wish the rightists (I guess that's the new lingo) could just let Hillary go, nobody else thinks about her.  Trump is the focus because that's what happens in that position. How can we have a meaningful conversation about a deflection?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6  devangelical    8 years ago
Historically, the party that loses the previous election licks its wounds, reboots its message and works with the majority party on issues where common ground can be found. This recipe that is the American miracle has worked remarkably well for 230 years – until now.

Just like teapublicans did from 01/20/2009 - 01/20/2017.

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6.1  PJ  replied to  devangelical @6    8 years ago

Amazing the short memory some have and how they're all about "working together" now.  I wonder what the demographic is of those who are now promoting a newly desired Kumbaya.........Thinking 2   

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6.1.2  PJ  replied to    8 years ago

We will have to disagree.  

 
 
 
lib50
Professor Silent
6.1.3  lib50  replied to    8 years ago
with the generous and growing support of the independents and a surprising number of disaffected and disgusted Democrats. Lol, didn't you get the memo, that Russian 'walkAway' propaganda was BS?  Catch up! Look at the polls, Trump is tanking in base country!

It turns out, the fake #WalkAway campaign, launched most likely by Russian operatives, has also been creating incredibly fake #WalkAway ads. In each ad, people of various races and backgrounds are featured with a simple message about why they’ve left the Democratic party.
 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
6.2  sixpick  replied to  devangelical @6    8 years ago
Historically, the party that loses the previous election licks its wounds, reboots its message and works with the majority party on issues where common ground can be found. This recipe that is the American miracle has worked remarkably well for 230 years – until now.

Just like teapublicans did from 01/20/2009 - 01/20/2017.

You mean during the time when they went to the voting booths and replaced over one thousand Democrat politicians?  I don't recall them telling anyone to harass the other side, get in their faces or destroy anything.  Only the Radical Left are known throughout history for doing that.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.2.1  JohnRussell  replied to  sixpick @6.2    8 years ago

Anyone who says that Donald Trump should be "accepted" is out of their mind.  Who the hell "accepts" a pathological liar? 

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6.2.2  PJ  replied to  sixpick @6.2    8 years ago

Well then you must have been in a coma.  Your amnesia is suspect and convenient.  We use to be able to hold at minimum an honest conversation even if we disagreed.  

 
 
 
1ofmany
Sophomore Silent
6.2.3  1ofmany  replied to  JohnRussell @6.2.1    8 years ago
Who the hell "accepts" a pathological liar.

Democrats nominated one for president. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.2.4  JohnRussell  replied to  1ofmany @6.2.3    8 years ago

Who the hell "accepts" a pathological liar. Democrats nominated one for president. 

No one compares to Trump. No one is even close. No one is even in the same galaxy. 

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
6.2.5  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  1ofmany @6.2.3    8 years ago
Who the hell "accepts" a pathological liar.
Democrats nominated one for president. 

I'd say BOTH parties put forth horrible candidates in the end. America didn't have ANY GOOD options as I see it.

Unfortunately what we ended up with IMO sucks and would have either way. But trump's words are not to be trusted. To me that really siucks, I like to be able to trust what a president tells me.

All I can do is hope for better luck on having at least ONE decent honest person to vote for next time. Deeds to me are not good enough. I was raised to say what I mean and to stand behind what I say. I dont respect people who don't do either. and hopefully I never will. 

So, I am hoping for better luck next time....  (But, I'm not holding my breath either) 

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
6.2.8  Ronin2  replied to    8 years ago

Trump lead us into war over Hillary?  WTF- did any of her supporters ever listen to her talk about foreign policy? After Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, etc- she never a met a military action she didn't support.  

As for domestic. Ignoring fly over country and catering to the leftist coasts- no, that wouldn't have pissed anyone off.  She would just label them all deplorables and continue to sell everyone in the US out to line her family vaults. I am sure several countries are thankful they no longer need to fund the Clinton Foundation (personal piggy bank).  Nor do they have to open their wallets/purses for $500,000 plus speaking engagements from Bill- just to get a message to Hillary. Women all over the planet are relieved that Bill will not be able to sexually harass as easily. 

I know the left likes to romanticize Obama's 8 years; but blaming Bush for his entire presidency; stating people who didn't agree with him , "cling to their bible, religion, and guns"; and calling Republicans the "enemy that needs to be punished" in a speech to illegals. It wasn't all peaches and cream for a good portion of the population. Which is why voters moved to restrict Obama's power with a Republican House and Senate; and even further by electing them enmasse at the state and local levels.

Of course Bush was no better labeling anyone that didn't agree with his wars traitors, or weak, etc. 

 
 
 
1ofmany
Sophomore Silent
6.2.9  1ofmany  replied to  JohnRussell @6.2.4    8 years ago
No one compares to Trump. No one is even close. No one is even in the same galaxy. 

Trump talks without regard to whether his statements are true of false. Hillary deliberately lies and she’s been lying for 40 years. When it comes to liars, she has no equal in this galaxy or any other. I didn’t vote for either one but, with Democrats rapidly becoming unhinged, I have to consider voting for Trump as a bulwark against insanity. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7  Vic Eldred    8 years ago

These and other Trump-haters make it clear that the left is united in its effort to get rid of President Trump – no matter what.


It's a moral disease. It's kind of what the Russian's saw when they realized how easily this nation could be divided......It was quite easy.

 
 
 
nightwalker
Sophomore Silent
7.1  nightwalker  replied to  Vic Eldred @7    8 years ago

How strange you should say that. Isn't the right aligned to "get" Hillary any way they can? And she's not even President.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  nightwalker @7.1    8 years ago

deleted

 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
7.2  sixpick  replied to  Vic Eldred @7    8 years ago
It's a moral disease. It's kind of what the Russian's saw when they realized how easily this nation could be divided......It was quite easy.

What is a mental illness?  Is an overwhelming obsession a mental illness?  Is the inability to accept the things one can not change a mental illness?  Is the desire to destroy a mental illness? 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  sixpick @7.2    8 years ago

I stand corrected

 
 
 
freepress
Freshman Silent
10  freepress    8 years ago

Not really too sure of your case, "razor thin defeat" after winning the popular vote. Trump only pulled about 80,000 votes from 3 critical states to win the electoral and lost the popular vote. Gore won the popular vote. Obama won both the electoral and the popular vote twice. The "tea party" did not propel McCain/Palin to victory, nor did it propel Romney to victory.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
10.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  freepress @10    8 years ago
The "tea party" did not propel McCain/Palin to victory,

The Tea Party didn't exist then. 

nor did it propel Romney to victory.

It couldn't help Romney, the IRS destroyed it the year before

 
 
 
1ofmany
Sophomore Silent
11  1ofmany    8 years ago

Democrats are trying to register illegal aliens to vote in local elections while simultaneously swearing that those same illegal aliens can’t/didn’t vote for President. They do that in conjunction with saying that the popular vote should take precedence over the electoral vote, knowing that it would shift voting power to the coastal looney bins that call themselves sanctuary cities. Now why would anyone be skeptical of their motives? /s

This is on top of preaching gender cofusion, supporting abortion on demand, advocating the abolishment of ICE, trying to give illegal aliens de facto citizenship, supporting fascist tactics like stalking//intimidating/assaulting the opposition, clogging the streets wearing pussy hats etc. They’re completely unhinged and cant figure out why people would vote for Trump unless Putin made them do it. 

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
11.1  PJ  replied to  1ofmany @11    8 years ago
Democrats are trying to register illegal aliens to vote in local elections

Is it 5 o'clock where you're at.....cause you've clearly been sipping on something.  I couldn't get beyond the first sentence.  Usually you lull me in with some pretty reasonable points before you throw in the comedy.  devil

 
 
 
1ofmany
Sophomore Silent
11.1.1  1ofmany  replied to  PJ @11.1    8 years ago

I’m high on reality, baby. San Francisco allows illegal aliens to vote in school board elections and it’s not the only one. 

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
12  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu     8 years ago

Sometimes I find headlines hilarious, this is one

"Trump Beat Hillary More Than A Year Ago But The Left Can't Let It Go – And It's Harming Our Country"

Hypocrisy is hilarious !!  Here we have a conservative biased article complaining about people holding on to their beliefs.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
13  MrFrost    8 years ago

"The left can't let it go." Yet it's the rightists that keep bringing it up...just like this article.. Fox news STILL runs Hillary conspiracy/fake news stories every single day, (twice a day when donny does something more stupid than usual). But the LEFT can't let it go? LMFAO

😂😂😂😂😂

 
 

Who is online





106 visitors