By Mark Tapscott | Friday, July 27, 2018
Former President Barack Obama’s eight years in the White House were marked by four huge scandals, each of which uniquely contributed to the unprecedented level of corruption now being exposed in the FBI’s Russia collusion investigation.
The four scandals include:
1.) Fast & Furious (2011), which exposed the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) selling high-powered rifles and other firearms to individuals known to be straw buyers for Mexican drug cartels.
2.) Benghazi (2012), the terrorist attack that killed four Americans in a U.S. consulate in Libya, including J. Christopher Stevens, the country’s ambassador to Libya, and the Obama administration’s false explanation of it.
3.) IRS targeting (2013) , in which the federal tax agency’s illegally singled out Tea Party, conservative, and evangelical nonprofit applicants for illegal harassment during the 2010 and 2012 election campaigns.
4.) Hillary email (2015) , which included hundreds of emails containing highly sensitive classified information to and from then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on her private server, which was compromised by multiple foreign powers and hackers.
Official wrongdoing seen separately in each of these four scandals came together to create the current FBI scandal.
Here’s how:
Defying Congress: When then-Attorney General Eric Holder was held in contempt of Congress on June 28, 2012, he became the first sitting member of a presidential cabinet to be so voted. The vote was the result of Holder’s refusal to turn over Fast & Furious documents sought by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
The committee, led by its chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), wanted to know why hundreds of an estimated 2,000 weapons — including AK-47s and .50 Calibre sniper rifles — whose sale to straw purchasers was sanctioned by DOJ, were turning up at crime scenes in Mexico and the U.S. After months of negotiations between Issa and DOJ failed, Holder simply refused to provide the requested documents.
Lying to America: For days after the terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, Obama, national security adviser Susan Rice, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Powers, among many others in the administration, claimed the four Americans who died were victims of a spontaneous protest of an obscure internet documentary critical of Muslims.
Rice notably repeated that claim on the five most-watched morning news programs on the Sunday following the Sept. 11, 2012 attack in Libya. Clinton also repeated it to relatives of the four men killed when their bodies were returned to the U.S. for burial.
In fact, U.S. officials knew soon after the start of attack, which included two highly coordinated waves and lasted nearly 12 hours, that the Libyan terrorist group Ansar al-Sharia was behind it. Clinton even told daughter Chelsea in an email during the attack that it was mounted by “an al-Qaida-like group” of terrorists.
Weaponizing law enforcement: When Congress approved and Obama signed Obamacare into law in 2010, debate over it had already sparked the Tea Party protest movement of mostly conservative and populist middle-class Americans, many of whom had never before participated in the political process other than voting.
To combat the movement, IRS senior executive Lois Lerner in 2010 began imposing extremely intrusive demands for information on Tea Party, conservative, and evangelical nonprofit applicants and delaying decisions on their applications for tax exemption.
That illegal harassment continued through Obama’s successful re-election campaign in 2012. Four years later, the IRS admitted its conduct was wrong and apologized.
The Lerner operation helped Obama’s re-election campaign, according to a 2017 study by four scholars from Stockholm University, Harvard’s Kennedy School for Government, and the American Enterprise Institute. They calculated that IRS targeting cost Republicans as many as 8.5 million votes in 2012 in an election that saw Obama defeat Mitt Romney by 5 million votes.
Double standard for Justice: Congressional investigators, according to The Hill , found passages in FBI documents stating that the “sheer volume” of classified information that flowed through Clinton’s insecure emails was proof of criminality as well as an admission of false statements by one key witness in the case, the investigators said.
“The name of the witness is redacted from the FBI documents, but lawmakers said he was an employee of a computer firm that helped maintain her personal server after she left office as America’s top diplomat and who belatedly admitted he had permanently erased an archive of her messages in 201 5 after they had been subpoenaed by Congress.”
Even so, former FBI counterintelligence chief Peter Strzok made a key change in the draft of then-FBI Director James Comey’s July 2016 statement to the nation on the bureau’s Hillary email investigation: Strzok changed the words “grossly negligent” to “extreme carelessness.”
Because federal law requires prosecution of federal officials, regardless of their title, for “gross negligence” in handling classified information, Strzok’s change, which Comey approved and told the nation of, effectively gave Clinton a free pass just months before voters went to the polls to decide between her and Donald Trump.
Even Comey’s revelation of new Clinton emails 11 days before the polls opened and his second absolution two days before the voting couldn’t deflate her seemingly invincible status on Election Day; she was overwhelmingly favored to defeat Trump.
Nearly three years after Clinton’s grossly negligent mishandling of classified information was first reported, she still has a security clearance that gives her access to … classified information.
And then came the Steele dossier: Strzok eventually joined special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation in May 2017 into allegations that aides to President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign against Clinton colluded with Russian interests.
But then a second messaging scandal broke, this one involving thousands of texts sent on FBI cellphones to and from Strzok and his lover, then-FBI lawyer Lisa Page. Their messages revealed deep, bitter, determined opposition to Trump and provided a map of their influence on the Hillary email and Russia collusion probes, the latter led by special counsel Robert Mueller, beginning in May 2017.
Strzok was removed from the Mueller probe and demoted to the FBI’s human resources department, while Page left the bureau entirely. Their departures from the active investigations, however, did nothing to change the facts about a profoundly dirty document at the heart of the Russia collusion investigation.
That document is the dossier prepared by former British spy Christopher Steele, based on material gathered in great part from Russian intelligence sources and described by former FBI Director James Comey as “ salacious and unverified .”
The dossier painted an extremely negative portrait of Trump and was funded by Clinton’s 2016 campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC), which she then controlled. The funding was channeled to Steele via the Perkins Coie law firm to Fusion GPS, a Washington, D.C.-based opposition research firm.
The dossier is at the heart of the Mueller probe because the FBI made it the primary basis for four applications to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Act seeking permission to spy on former Trump foreign policy adviser Carter Page.
The FISA court approved the surveillance, but the FBI concealed from the judges the fact the dossier was funded by Clinton. The FBI also assured the court that the information in its applications for surveillance authority was credible and verified. Mueller has indicted multiple people but not Page.
Virtually all that has come out about the Steele dossier, the FISA warrant, the Strzok/Page texts and protection Clinton from prosecution, along with the key facts in the four preceding scandals listed, resulted from three sources.
Most prominent at every stage have been congressional investigations, especially by the House Judiciary Committee, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Republican leaders on those panels have brought pressure through subpoenas, contempt citations, and impeachment threats. Also prominent was the June 9 report from the DOJ’s inspector general, whose office exhaustively documented the virulent hatred for Trump in the Strzok/Page text messages.
Finally, the nonprofit government watchdog Judicial Watch has adroitly used Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to obtain court orders forcing release of key documents in all of the scandals covered in this post. The Judicial Watch document archive is a rich resource for those interested in fully understanding these scandals.
Just as Holder refused to turn over Fast & Furious documents sought by Congress, the DOJ and the FBI have done the same thing regarding the Hillary email and Russia collusion investigations.
Just as Obama, Rice, Powers and Clinton lied about Benghazi, so did Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein (appointed by Trump), former FBI Director James Comey (appointed by Obama), and former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe (promoted by Comey) — when they signed the FISA applications and thereby certified the credibility of the material included in the documents.
Just as Lerner weaponized the IRS against the Tea Party, using the FISA process and the Steele dossier to enable surveillance of Page was a raw exercise of federal law enforcement and intelligence resources in an effort to harm Trump and thereby help Clinton.
Finally, just as the double standard of justice protected Clinton, the FBI investigation of the Russian collusion allegations led to the Mueller probe against Trump, even though it was Clinton who paid for Russian dirt on Trump.
That may be the ultimate example of a double standard in American justice.
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
Thanks Mark for stating the obvious
...obvious bullshit.
As in contrast to the oblivious bullshit the left is manufacturing, recycling, regurgitating, and believing in these days.
Want to avoid a prolonged future with Trump Derangement Syndrome? Run a candidate that is more popular than Trump; that is if you believe the same polls that predicted Hillary winning in a land slide. Also, try to get a candidate that remembers how our elections work- and doesn't ignore fly over country. Maybe, just maybe, doesn't call anyone that doesn't agree with her "deplorable". Being less corrupt would be a bonus; but chances are it will be another Establishment Democrat that is put forward- so lesser corruption will only be by degrees.
Of course right now all the Dems have is Hillary, who looks to be getting in line for a 3rd run. If Trump is so weak where are all the Dem candidates lining up to run against him? They should be cuing up at this point. Maybe Hillary has finally learned his less after multiple failures? Nah, that is asking her for too much.
It applies to this whole seed, none of you can defend the Orange Orangutan without saying, "What about Hillary", "What about Obama", etc., etc.
That's not the point of the seed at all. It's not a comparison. We know you love what radical Obama did just like we love what Trump has already accomplished - BTW Trump needs no defense. The seed concerns the way Obama politicized government agencies, especially the ones who nurtured the fake collusion narrative and subsequent investigation
No different than you guys spouting "But...Buuuuuusssshhhhhhh" for 8 freaking years.
No, he hasn't been charged......yet. However, you must ask yourself one question, if Trump has nothing to hide and, if he hasn't done anything wrong, then why is he trying so hard to cover up what ever it is the Russians did and, to keep his campaign officials, such as Manafort, Flynn and, Cohen out of prison? Someone who has done nothing wrong doesn't go around trying to obstruct an investigation or, continually trying to tell everyone they are innocent, you know, turning public opinion against the very people investigating what the Russians did in our elections and, trying to find a way to prevent it from happening again.
So, you don't think that the Russians interfered in our election in 2016? Got it. Or, is it that you think that it is alright if the Russians interfered in our elections?
Big difference, Bush lied for eight years while he was in office and, you guys loved it, even when he caused the Great Recession, started two unfunded wars one of which didn't need to be started in the first place.
Typical derail. The seeded topic is a precise, factual list pertaining to Obama's lies. Please prove that the seeded article is not true and that Obama and his Administration did not lie for 8 years.
Well tell us how President Trump hurt you.
I don't want to hear about what he is.
Tell us how President Trump has personally hurt you.
It was another poster who did the "typical derail", I simply answered him.
You prove that Trump hasn't lied for the past two decades and, that he isn't Putin's butt buddy.
You don't know anything about me, if you did you would know one thing for sure, I don't care what happens to me personally, however, I do care about my family, extended and, my children and, grandchildren, I see what he is doing and, I know that it isn't going to be good for them in years to come if he is allowed to continue. I also look at what happened in the last election and, I'm not talking about the results of that election, I'm talking about the blatant conspiracy between one candidate and, a foreign power.
deleted
I know you couldn't answer a question.
Why should I? The seeded article is about Obama and his administration ... not Trump.
Just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean I didn't answer your question.
And, that is why I put up that picture earlier. Obama isn't president and, hasn't been for almost two years. Once again, this article is a deflection of what the Orange Nutcase is doing.
Sure they did. I also believe that Donald J Trump did not conspire with them. I also believe that Trump legitimately won that election.
Can you separate all those things?
You see, after the 8 years of Obama they thought that the future would be just like Obama it was under his leadership. The future would be just as their leftist teachers and liberal political leaders had promised them it would be. Then came Trump!
They are obsessed by everything Trump says. He controls their lives now. They have to express their outrage on a daily basis.
much in the same way as Hillary and Obama living rent-free in some people's heads ... so obsessed they constantly have to mention one or both ?
Sure I can but, the question is, can Trump.
I'm glad you can see it, Trump sure can't, he even said so when he met with Putin and, he has stated that he doesn't believe it many times since the campaign.
That's what Mueller's probe will tell us.
I do to, I do believe however, that the Russians had a campaign of their own, Putin even admitted it at that above mentioned meeting with Trump.
How about when Trump said this:
You see if liberals would stop conflating Russian meddling with the "collusion" part of the investigation, Trump would feel much more comfortable about admitting the Russians meddled.
BTW I firmly believe that if Hillary won, we wouldn't be hearing ANYTHING about Russian meddling!
Once again, it isn't about collusion, it is about the meddling and, conspiracy, it has already been shown that members of Trumps campaign CONSPIRED with Russians and, met with Russians during the campaign so, the question is, "What did Trump know and, when did he know it?"
I doubt that Hillary would have swept it under the rug, in fact I think she would have launched an investigation and, had the intel community retaliate against the Russians for it. Of course I could be wrong but, I doubt it.
Oh, by the way, your utube video doesn't work.
No, it hasn't.
Seriously, you guys need to dial in the crazy.
Ya need to keep up.
You should your reports. Neither was charged with conspiring with Russians.
The only thing the two of them did wrong was lie to the fbi, which is a crime for republicans.
Link please
Supplied in 1.4.31.
I don't know how to make this any simpler. As a matter of common sense, don't you get that if those two had engaged in a criminal conspiracy with Russians, Mueller would have charged them with engaging in a criminal conspiracy with Russians? Think about it for more than two seconds and I'm sure you'll see how absurd it is to point to two people who were not charged with conspiring with Russians as proof that a criminal conspiracy with Russians existed.
The amount of stuff that doesn't pass the laugh test that the left puts out on this site can be exhausting to wade through.
Ha Ha, Sorry, No crimes there
Lying to the FBI is a crime for anyone.
Ask yourself a question and, let's see if you can come up with the right answer, "Why would Mueller let these two men plead guilty to a lesser charge of lying to the FBI?", here's my answer to that question, They have more information which they are willing to give Mueller on someone who is higher up the food chain in the Trump Administration or, in the campaign. The same thing was done during the Watergate investigation, that's why most of the conspirators in that got lite sentences, they had dirt on the next person up the Nixon Administration ladder.
Six people were granted immunity in the Clinton e-mail investigation. We got nothing in return for that
Maybe that's because, as Hillary said, there is no there there.
Oh there was plenty there - including the destruction of subpoenaed e-mails. That guy got immunity as well. You don't give out immunity for nothing - in that case the FBI did. That's what you should be thinking about
Nope, nothing there, just like the comment you made,
Lynch & Comey and Strzok fixed it and they were obvious about it
Good article, Vic. There's one name missing: Valerie Jarrett. She remained in the shadows for 8 years, but Obama heavily relied on his long-time faithful friend's advice/training.
Nine and a half years in and zero Obama campaign or administration officials have ever been indicted for malfeasance.
Mrs Clinton, for example, hasn't held public office for nearly six years and been investigated by three gop congresses...
Outside the far far far RW bubble we're in the midst of our worst constitutional crisis in forever. So, WAKE UP PEOPLE!
You may clap yourselves on the back for shit that ain't never gonna happen because Trump's shit is coming down now.
The only Constitutional crisis is the far reaching abuse against civil liberties being committed by the left in their zeal to unseat a legitimately elected president.
Republican president, republican congress, republican FBI, republican SCOTUS...."it's all the dems fault". Does the right ever, EVER accept responsibility for ANYTHING?
The Republicans aren't the ones trying to overturn a legitimate election or falling into Putins hands by casting doubt on our voting process.
You sure? I mean, you do realize that this entire investigation is run by republicans, right?
Everyone in charge right now is a Republican, the head of the DOJ is a Republican, his deputy is a Republican, the person in charge of the Russia probe is a Republican, the Congress is controlled by the Republicans, the White House is controlled by a Republican and, the SCOTUS is split 50/50 right now and, will have another Republican on it soon so, who's doing all this doubt casting? It has been proven that the Russians interfered in the election and, that they cast doubt on Hillary with internet feeds on FB and, Twitter as well as staging fake Trump rally's and, protests, they also hacked the DNC and, they hacked at least 30 states elections rolls, all of this has been proven to have happened.
For a supposed witch hunt it seems to me Mueller has a lot of witch's indicted.
Mueller has the same thing he's had for months- two perjury traps for procedural crimes, two dirty lobbyists accused of something that happened long before Trump, and a whole lot of Russian trolls that are just there to bloat up Muellers scalp count. He's just running around in circles at this point.
Whatever, keep thinking that, it seems every time you guys start with this kind of stuff Mueller comes out with new indictments.
He better hurry up - we are about to appoint another Supreme Court Judge!
The Watergate investigation took years, as did other investigations, like Iran/Contra and, you expect Mueller to finish an investigation in months that involves not only Americans but, Russians as well?
And you keep forgetting those investigations actually had a criminal pretext. Shall we stroll down memory lane? The early 70's when the country was deeply divided (like now) and the nation fed up with protests & riots voted for Nixon in a landslide. The media was just then shedding its objective perspective. There was that break-in which was logically and obviously tied to Nixon (unlike today)
Ok?
"Whatever, keep thinking that, it seems every time you guys start with this kind of stuff Mueller comes out with new indictments."
No kidding. At this rate Mueller will be indicting half the population of Siberia. We'll have to send in the Special Forces just to seperate the Ruskie trolls from all the polar bears and walruses.
Please stop. The entire universe knows Hillary got a pass as did Lois Lerner. It's easy when you get to investigate yourself. We have now seen the liberal creeps who were doing the investigating
1.) Fast & Furious (2011), which exposed the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) selling high-powered rifles and other firearms to individuals known to be straw buyers for Mexican drug cartels. The DOJ did their jobs, the prosecutors dropped the ball because they didn't think they could get convictions with the loose gun regulations against straw gun buyers. Conservative false narrative goes "Poof!".
2.) Benghazi (2012), the terrorist attack that killed four Americans in a U.S. consulate in Libya, including J. Christopher Stevens, the country’s ambassador to Libya, and the Obama administration’s false explanation of it. Except that Obama called it a terrorist attack the day after it happened. Conservative false narrative goes "Poof!".
3.) IRS targeting (2013), in which the federal tax agency’s illegally singled out Tea Party, conservative, and evangelical nonprofit applicants for illegal harassment during the 2010 and 2012 election campaigns. Except they also searched for names such as "Progressive", "Occupy", "Medical Marijuana", and "Open source software". Conservative false narrative goes "Poof!".
4.) Hillary email (2015), which included hundreds of emails containing highly sensitive classified information to and from then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on her private server, which was compromised by multiple foreign powers and hackers. Out of thousands and thousands of emails she sent as Secretary of State, only 110 were found to be classified and the FBI reviewed them, read them, and concluded she was not trying to hide anything by using her private server. There is no scandal here, conservative false narrative goes "Poof!".
"Official wrongdoing seen separately in each of these four scandals came together to create the current FBI scandal."
What nonsense. If this is their attempt to create some kind of Obama crime syndicate it's a very poor job of it because in every case the claims are easily refuted.
They stalled & stonewalled and black supremacist Eric Holder was held in contempt
Except that Obama called it a terrorist attack the day after it happened.
He made a vague reference to terrorism that the left uses to defend him. What they tried to hide (by using their feared anti Muslim rhetoric) was the fact that those people could have been rescued had the State Department not been ordering the military rescue group to keep changing back and forth into civilian clothes to uniforms, so as not to offend the locals.
Except they also searched for names such as "Progressive", "Occupy", "Medical Marijuana", and "Open source software"
Belated searches, which was used to pretend they were unbiased, something they admitted to. They destroyed the Tea Party Movement through fear & intimidation and Obama went on to win the 2012 election.
Out of thousands and thousands of emails she sent as Secretary of State, only 110 were found to be classified and the FBI reviewed them
The FBI conducted the most bogus investigation in the history of the US. No Grand Jury, Immunity to multiple individuals (including the creep who used bleach bit on the subpoenaed e-mails) for no reason, deciding the case before Clinton was interviewed, allowing her lawyer to attend (who was also subject of the investigation) the interview of Clinton, at which there were no notes taken, nor was Hillary put under oath. Finally, after Obama's AG got caught talking with Bill Clinton, Comey gets to make the decision (which he had no right to) and the word negligent is removed from the decision because it is the wording of the law that would have convicted Hillary Clinton. Compare that to the heavy handed tactics used by a special counsel in the "Russia" investigation.
ALL OF THOSE CASES WERE HANDLED BY THE OBAMA JUSTICE DEPARTMENT> THANKS FOR PROVING THE POINT OF THE ARTICLE!
The point must be that this is a whole lot of nothing, because even your opinion riddled narrative fails to indict anyone of any actual wrong doing, just a lot of hot air and claims of circumstantial evidence yet you can't say what she was trying to hide, what Clinton said to the AG that got her recused (it was a nothing burger but she stepped away anyway to avoid any impropriety but that's still not good enough). None of your rant has a lick of actual solid prosecutable evidence of malfeasance.
She was the alternative candidate to Trump and heavily favored to win. That's part of the reason the leadership of the FBI didn't let a field office handle that investigation. The key word is "handle"
Well get to refuting the three you listed.
Don't hold your breath waiting for it.
1.) Fast & Furious (2011): Non-scandal.
Started under the Bush administration, this task force was trying to track and prosecute straw gun buyers that were selling their guns to the cartel and other illegal purchasers. The work the DOJ did was sound, prosecutors declined to prosecute due to the gun laws in those States not being clear enough against straw gun sellers, thus the guns being tracked that got sold to some Mexican cartels weren't followed up on. Obama conspiracy? NOT!
2.) Benghazi (2012): Non-scandal
After 8 exhaustive partisan investigations the REPUBLICANS concluded that Hillary could not have prevented the attack. There was in fact riots started in several middle east nations over an anti-Muslim Youtube video so when Susan Rice mentioned Benghazi might be related she was correct, but after the facts came out it showed that this was a planned attack that happened to coincide with the riots. Obama said the day after the attack, "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation , alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.". That doesn't sound like someone trying to obfuscate what he knew was an act of terror.
But Bush.....
Bull. Susan was on a T.V. circuit for days pushing the administrations talking point.
wow there seems to such a need to keep going back in time as if that changes the here and now.
I mean the Obama years had less dysfunction in those placed in cabinet positions. Had stability in leadership roles in critical law enforcement federal entities, like the FBI , CIA, HOMELAND AND ICE. Had no sexual scandals that directly involved Obama.
And yet here we go with another scorned ex-girlfriend rally to suggest the past is worst then the now, it doesn't! What i have found very interesting in reading some of the comments here and there , is how much crap this man has created and somehow much of it you types keep eating it up.
i mean if you were a parent of kid and your child brought home trump you would never let your child out of your site. But this grown ass man has constant word vomit, played with hookers, lied about meetings that factually have occurred, found someone to pay money to folks to keep em quite along with a host of business dealings that have went belly up.
I just keep wondering what makes some of you get on the blog site and type in a manner that suggest you have a need to validate this trump guys mentality as normal adult behavior.
Sadly its not, but having a place to share your opinion is what makes this country wonderful (cough cough)
Indeed it does. Thanks for sharing yours!
Really? We didn't have the same view of the Obama years as you do. As a matter of fact we felt what he did was destroying this country. deleted
sheesh man, this is all about the image of a man that represents us to the world.
And for each screw up he has, it makes those who called this his mentality more right. And i am always one to give anyone a chance but again this guy cant keep it together.
because as i noted above, this seeded article does provide the fact that the list of directly connected folks have had no legal issues is proof positive of a better character typed person.
again stop it, the only animal is the cheating cant keep his dick in his pants man in this white house. And again i use the relative comparisoin of being a parent of a teenager or an adult. And when i look at the two men and how they both have acted there is no doubt that a smart parent would never want there child to date a trump.
again Vic, the question comes down to all the names above have not had the missteps in those 8 years and years after that this guy has in 1 year. So i am inclined to suggest there is a reason you guys keep ignoring his issues, i guess thats what he bets on.
So where is your link?
deleted
Where's your link?
I asked you first... LOL
You are laughing at your own post? Um............ok... LOL
well nice try on that one.....like i pointed out, there is nothing there because the character of Obama and those around him dont allow for something to come up after the fact.
A simple way to share this point might be this saying
"if you tell the truth, you dont have to have a good memory" and that is in fact how this president fails to live by.
I assume you understand that simple phase means "time does not effect the truth".
your video is not proof of any kind, but i like the effort.
Is it Kevin Bacon???
What does this mean? The "documentary" was not obscure, it inspired attacks on US diplomatic properties around the middle east.
John, John, John, John - please -
This is basically a completely dishonest article.
Deleted
Wow, I guess trump always tells the truth to his voters? LMAO!!!!!!
<deep breath>
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I voted for him but I am not naïve enough to believe half the shit that comes out of his mouth.
He is still better than the alternative that lying, corrupt Hillaryious bitch Hillary Clinton.
You did know trump lies, literally 4 times as much as Hillary, right? LMAO!!!!
well if you describe Hilary the way you did, then sadly you are the type of person he counted on...................................do you get that?
Remember when the Left were criticizing Trump because it was said that he said he didn't need the morning intelligence meeting every day? Well, if Obama didn't know about any of this, which is impossible for anyone with an ounce of sense to believe, then he must have missed numerous meetings. Which he probably didn't. They probably just had to move them up a few hours.