Fake News Media True Cause of Social Unrest in America
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
The anti-Trump media has been hard at working trying to shuffle blame for the rash of violence in the past week away from themselves and on to the president. But there is no escaping the fact that the fake news media remains the driving force behind the fierce divisions in America.
Dating back to the 2016 presidential campaign, outlets such as CNN relentlessly tried to smear now-President Donald Trump as a bigot, racist, misogynist, homophobe and any derogatory label that would create discord among American voters. They failed. But in the wake of an election that swept out Democrats — much to the chagrin of the establishment media — CNN and others doubled-down on hate speech.
A prime example of this was the gross misrepresentation of the president’s remarks after the Charlottesville violence that cost one young woman her life.
“I think there is blame on both sides,” the president reportedly said in August 2017. “You had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides.”
A reasonable or impartial person would understand these remarks as pointing to the white supremacists and Antifa as the bad actors who should shoulder the blame. The “fine people” would naturally refer to other groups of peaceful protestors from both conservative and liberal groups. But CNN and other left-wing media have yet to stop claiming the president was referring to the white supremacists as the “fine people.” That is exactly the type of rhetoric used by the fake news media to inflame tempers.
On the anniversary of the Charlottesville tragedy, the president remembered the events with this tweet.
“The riots in Charlottesville a year ago resulted in senseless death and division,” the president reportedly tweeted. “We must come together as a nation. I condemn all types of racism and acts of violence. Peace to ALL Americans!”
President Trump’s remarks calling for unity have largely been ignored by the fake news media. In recent weeks they have supported the Democrat political-speak that the divisions are caused by the White House and Democrats can “no longer be civil” as Hillary Clinton famously said.
Fake news media outlets and liberal extremists have created a wide berth of racial tensions by misleading African-Americans about the content and meaning of the president’s remarks. Liberal politicians and fake news outlets have engaged in a propaganda campaign to replace the common phrase referring to racists as “white supremacists” with the term “white nationalists.” The target continues to be the ability of the fake news to claim that when the president says the word “nationalist,” they can claim racism.
“As someone who is a target of the president’s hate, what I can tell you is that this is reckless and it’s not responsible from someone who is stirring a cauldron of hate. You see the fumes landing in so many different places,” CNN contributor and American Urban Radio Network correspondent April Ryan reportedly said.
“We saw this, what happened in Pittsburgh before, a couple of years ago at Mother Emmanuel Church. It’s a sad day when people are gathering in their house of worship, moralistically and lovingly trying to worship their god and being shot down because of a call, a code, a dog whistle.”
Ryan, an African-American White House correspondent, has been widely criticized for unethical messaging. At one point, she retweeted a despicable lie that the White House was engaged in child trafficking. Her use of the terms “code” and “dog whistle” are among the latest propaganda tools used by Democrats such as Maxine Waters to support a false “white” nationalist position of the president.
As many are aware due to the nationally-televised interviews with President Trump, he considers himself a nationalist as opposed to the “globalist” Democrats in the previous administration. President Trump is a nationalist in the tradition of placing American interests ahead of those of other countries. As he has stated many times, his foreign policy is sympathetic to disadvantaged countries, but his loyalty is to all Americans first.
California Rep. Maxine Waters has been among the more vocal Democrats to deliberately misrepresent the president’s meaning in the face of his clarifications. CNN and other fake news outlets refuse to acknowledge the president’s repeated definition of a nationalist.
“How do you marry the situation with the president last week saying he is a nationalist? All you have to do is say white nationalist to that,” Ryan reportedly said. “We have seen this before what happened with the bombs. We saw the Kroger in Kentucky. A white man shot and killed two black people.”
Like other instances of media propaganda, this distorted rhetoric divides Americans by race. The fake news media has no intention of reporting the facts or telling the truth. They are bent on pushing dangerous rhetoric that attempts to pit one American against another. That’s why the fake news media — in no uncertain terms, remains — “the enemy of the people.”
Tags
Who is online
104 visitors
Poor, poor frightened conservatives, so afraid of boogey men and women of color, so easily manipulated by their fear and biases. And so quick to toss out their supposed 'values' and positions for the 'win'.
You talkin' 'bout them there "Tokens" Liberals love to hate ?
Except racism is the favorite ism for trump followers and trump himself
How about a great liberal philosopher from the past:
"The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others"........ John Stuart Mill
Once again, you do your post an injustice by not quoting the whole thing, let me help,
So, since you quoted him and, the full quote includes the two lines that I've marked in red and, blue, can you tell me why the Right is so concerned with telling women what they can do with their body's?
That isn't so much a right/left issue. In case you haven't heard the position of the pro-LIFE movement, it involves the rights of the unborn. I know the Court that decided Roe never gave a thought to the life of the child, the Court has evolved and I am willing to bet the rights of the unborn is about to change as well.
Keep dreaming, a fetus will never have rights over a woman. Women will never be made second class citizens for the sake of a fetus.
That's called Misandry. Women will have their rights. A child will have rights. As always, it all requires balance
If the Scum party retains all three branches, it very well could happen. Don't think for one second that it can't.
[Removed]
Removed
[Removed]
[deleted]
removed for context
Poor EA, always getting stifled! Never mind this place, EA, come to the bar with me, I'm buyin!
[deleted]
[Please take your meta] to [metafied.]
The right to life issue will never, ever be permanently solved or resolved in the United States.
It's like the chicken and the egg issue, who prevails the unborn or the mother?
I can tell you a whole lot of horror stories about what happened in this country when abortions were illegal.
Legal or not legal, abortions will be performed! Either in safe, clean hospitals by qualified doctors. Or in concealed unregulated abortion dens, performed by anyone that says they know how to do it.
Until they figure a way to keep a fetus alive from conception to the end of nine months without a female uterus then something will have to give, I support a woman's right to chose what happens to her body.
You got that right. Right Wing misogynistic men want the right to tell women what they can do with their body's and, their lives, that goes against the Constitution and, the Civil Rights act not to mention Roe v. Wade.
Don't you mean devolved?
Justice Kavanaugh
Give me a list of women who have killed a human being by deciding what to do with their body's in regards to Roe v. Wade.
It wasn't a Democrat that chose Kavanaugh, he's strictly a Republican throw back and, I wish we could throw him back.
Can not give you a list. There have been upwards of 50,000,000 human beings killed by abortion (Row v Wade) since 1970.
A woman's reproductive decisions have nothing to do with misandry. What an ignorant comment. Google the word so you can use it correctly next time.
E.A Does that mean that a Woman takes to heed/consideration/to mind/ respects a MANS Decision before an Abortion? ( Exceptions pending )
If not do tell what is Misandry?
E.A Does that mean that a Woman takes to heed/consideration/to mind/ respects a MANS Decision before an Abortion? ( Exceptions pending )
If not do tell what is Misandry?
Misandry has nothing to do with abortion, your post makes no more sense than xx's.
Took 2 seconds to google, but here you go :
mis·an·dryE.A WOW!!!
Interesting but the Inverse!! Is Misogynistic? Spin Much?
A Man that says a Woman should not have an ABORTION is called?
ingrained prejudice against men
BINGO!!!!!
Sounds like you're conversing with yourself. Not sure if english is your first language, your posts are incoherent.
It's not even a language issue per se. The thinking behind his posts is incoherent, and stylistically he always tries to lead people down these vague rabbit holes......which is a truly dumb tactic if one can't communicate effectively to begin with.
Maybe because, that was a false claim.
Stop making this claim since you can't provide a list of court cases for "murdered humans".
Hmm! Moving the goalposts again I see. You vdudnot say anything about court cases in the first question.
Well hell, I thought it was obvious there Captain, you accuse someone of murdering a human don't they end up in court?
E.A Yes If I recall right " There was a time that Killing a Slave was not deemed as Murder " is that the times one wants to go to? or the Preferred Misuse of " Humans "?
Ok so I asked this question, "Give me a list of women who have killed a human being by deciding what to do with their body's in regards to Roe v. Wade.", and that is your answer? So, your mother killed a human being because of Roe v. Wade? Let's not forget she is a woman.
Times are changing and changing fast, but the first thing to change won't be the imbalance of rights. It will be a Court decision referred to as "Chevron". (federal agencies broad powers) Right now there is a case awaiting the SCOTUS called "Weyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service". That is going to be one to watch!
Sooo, what you're saying is you hope that the SCOTUS votes to support the company's in this so that they can destroy wetlands and, forest for profit. Do you have something against nature, hunting, fishing, fresh drinking water and, breathable air?
No and you are missing the point. This is not about the environment vs business. It is about federal agencies wielding law making power that only congress should have.
There are or, should be people in those agencies who know what they are talking about when it comes to what their agency covers, in this case, fish and, game. I understand that business's should be able to expand but, do we let them expand at the expense of certain animals habitats? If that is the case then we wouldn't have any more forests, wetlands, rivers or, any other natural areas for them to live in. In the case of this frog, there is only one place for it to survive, the land that these folks want to fill in to use for new business, I'm sure there is other land available for the business, this is the only land available for these frogs to survive. Remember, there is this little thing in nature called the "Butterfly effect".
Yes a child has rights, a fetus is not a child, [deleted]
Who gets to determine what lands are off limits? Our elected representatives or some over paid federal appointee?
Maybe you can tell us all when life begins?
E.A LOL: Yes especially when Courts have stated that Both the Ova and Sperm are living, that does create a complexity, Two Living units Combine, and the end result is ????
Let them Dig!!!!
Scientists don't know the answer to the question I gave to Don
Did you know that most conceptions end in early abortion before the mother even knows she's pregnant? Did these fertilized eggs go to heaven or hell?
Does that representative have a science degree in the field needed to make that decision or, does that "over paid" federal appointee have that degree?
So you would rather have an "expert" have the authority to make law, rather than the American people. I'm with the founding fathers. Only the congress gets to make laws.
I believe that expert should be able to make a suggestion as to what restrictions should be on certain lands and, that Congress can then decide on a fitting law to cover that restriction. The EPA and, the Bureau of Land Management and, Fish and, Game should have a say in what restrictions there are on the use of our lands, if this isn't done then we will see many things go the way of the Dodo bird. We almost lost the wolf which was proven to be a disaster in some areas because of the over population of other animals that they kept in check, we've seen the introduction of plants that have taken over certain areas simply because there was no natural barrier to them like in the area that they came from.
Good. Then we agree.
Only in part, as I said in the rest of my comment, The EPA and, the Bureau of Land Management and, Fish and, Game should have a say in what restrictions there are on the use of our lands, if this isn't done then we will see many things go the way of the Dodo bird. We almost lost the wolf which was proven to be a disaster in some areas because of the over population of other animals that they kept in check, we've seen the introduction of plants that have taken over certain areas simply because there was no natural barrier to them like in the area that they came from.
Why would any conservative be afraid of hypocrites? Allow me to introduce you to fake news CNN hypocrite Don Lemon, who infamously said, "“the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right”.
His boyfriend is a white man. Don't believe me? Check the photos for yourself.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4938534/Don-Lemon-leaves-SNL-pary-rumored-boyfriend.html
That whole post made no sense whatsoever.
ps, domestic terrorism in this country this year? Old white men. Deal with it.
The only fake news is that generated by Trump and the far right wing. It's been that way since Fox.
No they aren't. They even dropped the, "fair and balanced" tag line several months ago because even they know they are not fair and balanced.
You're one of them.
Twenty Five years from now whites will become another minority in the United States. Have fun.
I won't be here unless I live to be 104.
The 'Fake News' meme never ends.
However, if it weren't for 'fake news' DJT would never be the 'fake president.
This too. Speaking of fake news. The Donald was never asked to 'put up or shut up' with his Birtherism conspiracies. And I do mean asked/demanded! Why is that? And if this man, the Donald J. Trump would have been forced to present his facts, truth and the results of his alleged investigators findings-----which DJT was never pressed------the Donald would still be that 'broke arse' New Yorker with the Slovenian wife---with hand out to the Russians or any other foreign criminal enterprise that was stupid enough to get involved with him.
And yeah Xx------this thing should have a disclaimer. Where is it?
It's interesting that the only thing which actually bothers Trump and his nutty followers is the truth, not lies. They literally don't care how much their glorious leader or Fox lie to them.
Your comments get more funny every time you
comment. Are you trying out for the comedy stage at the next trump flop
XX have you noticed the Takeover of you seed by "
?
Other ways known as " Talking Heads "
context EA, context.
A Dorothy Dixer is a plant to help said minister or seeder/author.
This is an interesting article. I looked up the source on Media Bias Fact Check and this is part of the analysis
When you observe the actual seeded article you see something peculiar in the places where the writer is quoting another person
The president didn't reportedly say there were "fine people on both sides", he said it. The seeded article has ZERO links, MBFC says that the American Liberty Report doesn't often use links in their articles. Nor do they seem confident in the quotes or sources. Obviously it is a flimsy far right "news" site trying to exploit feeble minds.
What's happening in Senate races?
Mr Trump's party is projected to hold on to the upper chamber in Congress, where they currently hold a slim 51-49 majority.
The turning point was when Republican businessman Mike Braun ousted incumbent Joe Donnelly, a moderate Democrat in Indiana.
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said Mr Trump had "closed the deal" for Mr Braun after appearing alongside him at a rally in the state on Monday night.
In Texas, Republican Ted Cruz Cruz was projected to beat his challenger, Democratic rising star Beto O'Rourke.