Trump says no 'credible' intel Russia offered Taliban bounty payments to kill Americans
Category: News & Politics
Via: tessylo • 6 years ago • 78 commentsBy: LINDA GIVETASH AND KELLY O'DONNELL AND MATTHEW BODNER AND KEN DILANIAN AND COURTNEY KUBE, NBC Universal
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
President Donald Trump said that U.S. intelligence officials had "just" told him there was no credible information suggesting Russian intelligence had offered to pay bounties to Taliban militants who killed American soldiers.
Because of this, intelligence officials had not initially reported the allegations to him or Vice President Mike Pence, Trump wrote in a tweet late on Sunday.
The news first reported by The New York Times on Friday triggered calls for a congressional investigation .
NBC News' sources were not able to make it clear how persuasive the intelligence is. A source told The Times that the assessment was based in part on interviews with Afghan detainees. That alone would not prove the case, but the U.S. would almost certainly have tried to get communications intercepts from the Russians that shed light. In the past, the National Security Agency has had success penetrating Russia's military intelligence unit, the GRU.
Earlier, Trump tweeted that "nobody briefed or told me," Vice President Mike Pence or White House chief of staff Mark Meadows about the intelligence. He called for The Times to "reveal" its sourcing.
Late on Saturday, National Intelligence Director John Ratcliffe also denied Trump had been briefed.
White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany also said in a statement Saturday that the president and other top officials were not "briefed on the alleged Russian bounty intelligence."
However, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told ABC's "This Week" on Sunday the president "wants to ignore any allegation against Russia" by denying knowledge of the intelligence.
"The president will not confront the Russians on this score, denies being briefed," Pelosi said. "Whether he is or not, his administration knows, and our allies — some of our allies who work with us in Afghanistan — had been briefed and accept this report."
The intelligence had been shared with congressional leaders and the British government, according to NBC News sources.
The president's latest comments followed a call by Trump ally Sen. Lindsay Graham , R-S.C., for Congress to "get to the bottom" of the reports.
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., who is on the Armed Services military personnel subcommittee, also called for a joint congressional investigation in a statement on Sunday.
The Associated Press reported the Trump administration was set to brief select members of Congress on the matter on Monday.
The Kremlin has not commented on the intelligence reports. However, Russia’s Foreign Ministry has denied the claims it paid militants in Afghanistan.
“This unsophisticated fabrication demonstrates the low intellectual abilities of propagandists in the American intelligence community,” the ministry told Russian state news agency RIA Novosti on Saturday.
An intelligence official said the report is not particularly surprising given the fraught history between the U.S. and Russia. The U.S. armed Afghan fighters with missiles to shoot down Soviet helicopters in the 1980s when the Soviet Union was fighting in Afghanistan, part of a CIA covert action that killed many Russians. In 2018, U.S. forces killed a number of Russian mercenaries who were operating with pro-regime forces in Syria.
Tags
Who is online
114 visitors
I don't place too much hope in the idea that we will get to the bottom of this. There are people up and down the Trump administration that will lie on his behalf. We need to throw all the bums out.
This one might have some legs John...... for obvious reasons related to military personnel and congress needing to be seen being concerned about them.
One other possibility here..... I think there are a number of republicans that are worried about their own reelection prospects this cycle, and this issue just might give them the opportunity to break from Trump. We'll see.
17 died in 2019, and 4 in 2020.
Care to explain how you got from point A to B with that statement.....?
Never mind..... we'll leave it be as an example of your logical thought process where: No = Almost
Tell the families that they buried a zero casualty. I am sure that will make them feel better.
You Believe the unsubstantiated report ?
Talk about Intellectually lazy !
Intellectually lazy !
Now.... Do you believe the unsubstantiated report by the "NY Times" ?
What ?????
Meh, it has been obvious for a long time that Trump doesn't give a shit about military personnel.
From a devout agnostic ...... Amen to that
"Trump" and "no credible intelligence"... almost synonymous...