'You are an idiot': Trump mocked for tweeting about 'entrance requirements' to virtual DNC

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  pat-wilson  •  last year  •  63 comments

By:   YahooNews

'You are an idiot': Trump mocked for tweeting about 'entrance requirements' to virtual DNC
Donald Trump has been mocked for suggesting that people needed ID to attend this year's virtual Democratic National Convention (DNC)."To get into the Democrat National Convention, you must have an ID card with a picture..." the president wrote in an early morning tweet on Friday.

(Facepalm)


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Read full article Matt Mathers August 21, 2020, 5:49 AM·2 mins read Getty Images

Donald Trump has been mocked for suggesting that people needed ID to attend this year's virtual Democratic National Convention (DNC).

"To get into the Democrat National Convention, you must have an ID card with a picture..." the president wrote in an early morning tweet on Friday.

In years gone by, those wishing to attend the DNC have been asked to buy a ticket and provide photographic ID to gain entry.

But in 2020, proceedings have been broadcast on TV and online to help stop the spread of coronavirus.

This meant that ID and tickets were not necessary - and eagle-eyed Twitter users were quick to point this out to the president.


To get into the Democrat National Convention, you must have an ID card with a picture...Yet the Democrats refuse to do this when it come to your very important VOTE! Gee, I wonder WHY???

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump)

August 21, 2020

"It's virtual!!" one wrote, in apparent dismay at the president's oversight, or lack of knowledge about the event.

"Trump is so far gone that he doesn't realise the Democratic National Convention is virtual," another added.

A third simply said: "You are an idiot, seriously."

In recent weeks, Mr Trump has attempted to claim that this year's presidential election could fall foul to voter fraud, as millions of Americans cast their votes via postal services due to the pandemic.


You are an idiot, seriously.

— David Weissman (@davidmweissman)

August 21, 2020

The president's post appeared to be a broadside at Democrats' opposition to voter identification at elections.

"Yet the Democrats refuse to do this when it come to your very important VOTE! Gee, I wonder WHY???(sic)," Mr Trump wrote in the second part of the tweet.

Story continues

Traditionally, Republicans have tended to support stricter controls on voting - such as providing ID at polling stations - to combat "fraud".

But multiple studies have shown that voter fraud in US presidential elections is extremely rare.

Democrats say that tightening voting regulations would unfairly impact minority groups, who are less likely to have ID.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
pat wilson
Professor Guide
1  seeder  pat wilson    last year

.jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Citizen Kane-473667
Professor Guide
1.1  Citizen Kane-473667  replied to  pat wilson @1    last year

Where does he say you need an ID to get into the virtual DNC? I'm not seeing it anywhere. It must be somewhere because if not, then this would be another bullshit story. Everyone knows that you would need an ID to get into the actual physical DNC but not the televised portion, so he must have said you need an ID to get into the  "Virtual DNC" for this story to be true. There is no way the Twitter crowd or Media would be deliberately playing stupid or obtuse considering how much beloved this President is by everyone, so it MUST be out there somewhere...

Help me find where he said that.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Participates
1.1.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Citizen Kane-473667 @1.1    last year
" To get into the Democrat National Convention, you must have an ID card with a picture..."

This was tweeted DURING the virtual convention. Why would anyone think he was talking about past conventions?

Trump was no doubt just re-tweeting right wing garbage talking points as usual. This hilariously ignorant argument from some on the right is that because back in 2012 the DNC decided to require a photo ID to get into the Democratic National Convention that it somehow was proof that voter ID laws weren't discriminatory. This is a flawed and monumentally stupid argument. The requirement was added for the first time because of the numerous death threats that Obama had received during his first term as President. There were many bitter racists threatening the Presidents life so requiring a photo ID was just common sense in a situation where people would be mingling with the POTUS. How many Presidents are there in the voting booth with voters? Why would voting be considered a high risk threat to a President thus requiring additional security?

This argument is just another lie on the mountain of lies conservative Republicans have used to cover up the actions they've taken to intentionally disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of eligible voters that historically vote for their opponents. It has nothing to do with protecting the election from fraud as there is no evidence of any widespread fraud, it is purely a political move to give themselves better odds in an election, aka cheating. But I don't think any of them have any shame or morals left so to them the ends justify the means, nothing is too low, nothing is too vile as long as it garners a 'win'.

So even if he hadn't made the comment during the virtual convention, he's still a complete idiot for trying to push such a stupid right wing narrative.

 
 
 
Citizen Kane-473667
Professor Guide
1.1.2  Citizen Kane-473667  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.1    last year

What makes you think he was talking about past conventions when the current one had the same requirement for those who were physically there?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Participates
1.1.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Citizen Kane-473667 @1.1.2    last year

None of that changes the fact that only an idiot would make such a hilarious flawed argument. Whether virtual or in person, the false narrative is still beyond stupid, it's like comparing apples and orangutans.

 
 
 
Citizen Kane-473667
Professor Guide
1.1.4  Citizen Kane-473667  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.3    last year

The flawed argument is that it is a burden to require ID to vote when you have to have it to buy alcohol, prescription medicine, drive a car, get a loan, cash a check, use a credit card or debit card (supposed to present it when using anyway) , open a bank account, rent or buy a house, see a R rated movie, and just about anything else in life. Matter of fact, there are places where you can be arrested and charged with resisting arrest or obstructing an investigation if you don't have an ID or refuse to present one.

Keep in mind that even though the past history of voter fraud is slim, by opening the doors to voting without ID or mass mail-in voting, you're actually giving BOTH Parties a chance to commit voter fraud. Do you really trust the Republican's honesty that much to give them that chance???

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Participates
1.1.5  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Citizen Kane-473667 @1.1.4    last year
Matter of fact, there are places where you can be arrested and charged with resisting arrest or obstructing an investigation if you don't have an ID or refuse to present one.

" If there is not  reasonable suspicion  that a crime has been committed, is being committed, or is about to be committed, an individual is not required to provide identification , even in these states "

" The court also held that the  Fifth Amendment  could allow a suspect to refuse to give his name if he has a reasonable belief that giving his name could be incriminating"

" you have to have it to buy alcohol, prescription medicine, drive a car, get a loan, cash a check, use a credit card or debit card"

How many of those are rights specifically given in the constitution? How many of those are required to be an American?

even though the past history of voter fraud is slim

Virtually non-existent is more like it.

by opening the doors to voting without ID or mass mail-in voting, you're actually giving BOTH Parties a chance to commit voter fraud

Both parties have been voting by mail for decades in multiple States with virtually no vote-by-mail fraud. Why should we all be forced to adopt strict Republican voter ID laws we know they created with the intent to disenfranchise minority voters when there is simply no evidence of any widespread voter fraud? On one hand we have virtually zero voter fraud when voting as we have for centuries with no photo ID and even vote by mail, and on the other hand we KNOW hundreds of thousands of eligible voters will likely be disenfranchised by the rules Republicans have invented with the intention of disenfranchising voters, their claim of preventing voter fraud is just a big fat lie and they know it. Continuing to lie about their motives is just showing what scum bag cowards they are.

Do you really trust the Republican's honesty that much to give them that chance???

While I wouldn't trust a Republican as far as I could throw one, I know that to try and cheat by mail is harder than most slime ball cheating Republicans think it is and I know they will just get caught if they try, which would be really hilarious to watch.

The lines have been drawn in this election, and Republicans know they can't win if the majority of eligible voters vote so they have resorted, as usual, to dirty tricks and pond scum shenanigans such as screwing with the post office, fighting vote by mail initiatives, pushing strict voter ID laws and proclaiming the election invalid if they don't win. They are pretty much just copying the Putin playbook other than ballot box stuffing, which I wouldn't put past them either on their push towards fascism.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Guide
1.1.6  seeder  pat wilson  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.5    last year

Well said, DP !

Now trump is saying the mail drop boxes aren't secure and they are not sterilized for Covid. You can't make this sh#t up !

 
 
 
Citizen Kane-473667
Professor Guide
1.1.7  Citizen Kane-473667  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.5    last year

Just out of curiosity, how do you feel about President Pelosi? Civil War? I hope that you are fine with both because this is what we are facing come January 20th, 2021. Both are actual possibilities stemming from the same reason--mail in voting. Which Party will concede without challenging the count? Neither. Which State will have all of the lawsuits settled over the count before 1/20/21? None. It doesn't matter either which candidate is eventually declared the winner. Neither side will accept it and will take to the streets in violent protesting of their outrage. The stage is being set for a Police State no matter who wins with a mandated mail-in voting. The losing side will claim they've been cheated. You know it. I know it. We ALL know it. We all ready have Antifa and BLM engaging in violence; do you think they will meekly accept the results, or see their ranks swell??? We have the Boogaloo Bois and the Militias gearing up for a violence. I don't know about you, but since we already have a system in place for Absentee voting, I don't see a need to send everyone a ballot in the mail that hasn't even asked for one.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
1.1.8  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Citizen Kane-473667 @1.1.7    last year
how do you feel about President Pelosi?

You are assuming the dems retain control of the house , which is a definite possibility , but not in any way actually guaranteed , if they do not retain the house it would be a republican speaker of the house that would take that position you posit. and of course people will keep this in mind while voting .

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Participates
1.1.10  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Citizen Kane-473667 @1.1.7    last year
Just out of curiosity, how do you feel about President Pelosi? Civil War? I hope that you are fine with both because this is what we are facing come January 20th, 2021

I'm not worried about either because that's simply not going to happen and is just a pure fear bomb being dropped by Trump supporters trying to throw smoke because they know he's losing. The election will happen and Biden will win with an overwhelming majority in both the popular vote and the electoral college vote. If some sniveling losers try and start a civil war after Trump gets his ass kicked so be it, they dig their own graves.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.11  JohnRussell  replied to  Citizen Kane-473667 @1.1.7    last year

If there was no mail in voting at all and Trump lost he would say he was cheated.  He instigated a commission to look into voter fraud after the 16 election because he wanted to be declared popular vote winner as well as EC winner, and thought declaring millions of democratic votes fraudulent was the way to achieve that.  Unfortunately his own commission couldnt find shit. 

Trump's thoughts about voter fraud are utterly worthless. 

 
 
 
Citizen Kane-473667
Professor Guide
1.1.12  Citizen Kane-473667  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.11    last year
If there was no mail in voting at all and Trump lost he would say he was cheated.

You sir, are indeed correct on that...and I expect the Biden camp to do the same.

 
 
 
Citizen Kane-473667
Professor Guide
1.1.13  Citizen Kane-473667  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.10    last year
I'm not worried about either because that's simply not going to happen

I actually hope you are right because the alternative is a very unpleasant thought...

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2  Tessylo  replied to  pat wilson @1    last year

Didn't he say the same thing about the grocery store?  Someone who has never been in a grocery store in his life.  Someone that has never needed ID for anything.  He's a fucking moron.  

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Principal
2  sandy-2021492    last year

Ok, so it is funny, or maybe I'm at the point where I'll laugh to keep from crying, but it really is embarrassing that our nation's highest office is occupied by a moron.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
3  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom    last year

Best comment ever:  "You are an idiot, seriously."  Thank you, David Weissman!!

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4  TᵢG    last year

One of the reasons there are speech writers and press secretaries is to buffer the PotUS from making extemporaneous remarks that make him look like a fool.   Trump, unlike most PotUS', cannot seem to stop himself from jabbering and tweeting away  jrSmiley_90_smiley_image.gif   and thus I have no sympathy when he puts his foot in his mouth.

What continues to suck is that every time he does this crap he makes the USA look worse to the balance of the planet.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Principal
4.1  Gordy327  replied to  TᵢG @4    last year

And yet, there are those who continue to stand by him and regard everything he says as gospel or defend his BS. Talk about fools!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Gordy327 @4.1    last year
"And yet, there are those who continue to stand by him and regard everything he says as gospel or defend his BS. Talk about fools!"

Yup, no matter what idiotic moronic crap that he spews, which he spews every day, you still have the defenders, here on Newstalkers and everywhere. 

I get so tired of the tRumpsplainers - well here is what he meant to say, or this is what he meant, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah

The projection and denial are so tiresome. 

You'd think they were being paid to defend the turd.   

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Principal
4.1.2  Gordy327  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.1    last year

I suppose some people prefer to be cheerleaders and/or sheep.

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Expert
4.2  FLYNAVY1  replied to  TᵢG @4    last year

Trump is basically a functionally illiterate adult.   Think about it.  He is either going to have to read from a teleprompter which is isn't good at, and when he freelances, there is no telling what nature of batshit stupid things will come out of his mouth....

His handlers for the RNC will need a few stiff drinks prior to and after his appearances.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
4.2.1  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @4.2    last year
His handlers for the RNC will need a few stiff drinks prior to and after his appearances.

$50 says they started yesterday.  

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Expert
4.2.2  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @4.2.1    last year

Cirrhosis of the liver must be an occupational hazard when working for the Trump admin.....

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Masters Principal
5  Nerm_L    last year

The party conventions have always been closed to the public.  For the general public the conventions have always been virtual.

People allowed into the convention do have to present some form of identification because the convention is closed to the general public.  

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Guide
5.1  seeder  pat wilson  replied to  Nerm_L @5    last year

We're talking about 8/2020.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Guide
5.1.1  bugsy  replied to  pat wilson @5.1    last year

There were reporters and other support personnel at the acceptance speeches. I'm sure they had to have an ID(press pass with a picture)  to get in.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
5.1.2  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  bugsy @5.1.1    last year
There were reporters and other support personnel at the acceptance speeches. I'm sure they had to have an ID(press pass with a picture)  to get in.

That's your argument in support of Trump's stupidity?  Next you'll be saying that Trump was 'just kidding'.  The next gust of wind you feel was generated by me...rolling my eyes.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Masters Principal
5.1.3  Nerm_L  replied to  pat wilson @5.1    last year
We're talking about 8/2020.

That's correct.  The 2020 virtual convention wasn't open to the general public, either.  Those allowed into the virtual convention required a different type of identification.

Also note that participation in the convention was more restricted than for past conventions.  States send delegations to the convention that participate in the roll call vote.  That did not happen with the virtual convention.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Guide
5.1.4  seeder  pat wilson  replied to  Nerm_L @5.1.3    last year
more restricted than for past conventions

Nothing in the 2020 DNC convention was like anything in the past, obviously. But I'll give you an A for effort.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Masters Principal
5.1.5  Nerm_L  replied to  pat wilson @5.1.4    last year
Nothing in the 2020 DNC convention was like anything in the past, obviously. But I'll give you an A for effort.

Does it bother you when Democrats have been shown to care more about protecting their party than protecting the election?

Democrats want closed and closely controlled primaries while declaring they are for free and open elections.  Democrats are telling the country to 'do as they say' while hiding what Democrats actually do.  That's a very nice hypocrisy that seems to only be available for the elite.

Joe Blow public are just useful means to an end.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Guide
5.1.6  seeder  pat wilson  replied to  Nerm_L @5.1.5    last year

You're straying off topic.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Participates
5.1.7  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Nerm_L @5.1.5    last year
Does it bother you when Democrats have been shown to care more about protecting their party than protecting the election?

No, because when they added the ID requirement in 2012 it was in direct response the the numerous death threats President Obama had received from right wing racists angered at having a black man in the oval office. Requiring photo ID's into a venue where the President was going to speak was purely a safety measure, not a "let's keep non-citizens out of the convention" bullshit narrative from the right. There is no such threat to the President when going to the ballot box and there has been no widespread voter fraud found that justifies the onerous additional photo ID requirements being made by conservative Republicans. Their motives are pure politics and have nothing to do with trying to prevent fraud and everything to do with trying to prevent minorities from voting because Republicans know they historically vote for Democrats. They know it and the courts know it. So they might as well give up the mind-numbingly stupid act of claiming the sky is falling from some imagined fraud, they're not fooling anyone but yourselves.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.8  Texan1211  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.1.7    last year

getting a simple ID, which the vast majority already has, is onerous?

How so?

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Masters Principal
5.1.9  Nerm_L  replied to  pat wilson @5.1.6    last year
You're straying off topic.

Isn't the topic a Trump tweet highlighting that the Democratic Party required ID to participate in a party function while stridently opposing requiring an ID to participate in an election?

The topic is really about Democrats adopting contradictory positions; do as Democrats say, not as Democrats do.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Masters Principal
5.1.10  Nerm_L  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.1.7    last year
No, because when they added the ID requirement in 2012 it was in direct response the the numerous death threats President Obama had received from right wing racists angered at having a black man in the oval office. Requiring photo ID's into a venue where the President was going to speak was purely a safety measure, not a "let's keep non-citizens out of the convention" bullshit narrative from the right. There is no such threat to the President when going to the ballot box and there has been no widespread voter fraud found that justifies the onerous additional photo ID requirements being made by conservative Republicans. Their motives are pure politics and have nothing to do with trying to prevent fraud and everything to do with trying to prevent minorities from voting because Republicans know they historically vote for Democrats. They know it and the courts know it. So they might as well give up the mind-numbingly stupid act of claiming the sky is falling from some imagined fraud, they're not fooling anyone but yourselves.

As you point out, requiring an ID is a security measure.  Democrats are only using Republicans or conservatives or the 'right wing' as an excuse for imposing those security requirements.  Democrats are admitting they have been easily manipulated into requiring what they stridently oppose.  That highlights that Democrats are demanding the country do as they say but not as they do.

Democrats want their party functions to be safe and secure.  But Democrats have officially adopted a position of unconcern for the safety and security of elections.  Party functions matter, elections do not matter.

Seems to me that if security requirements are necessary for party functions then security requirements should be necessary for elections, too.  

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Guide
5.1.11  seeder  pat wilson  replied to  Nerm_L @5.1.9    last year
Isn't the topic a Trump tweet highlighting that the Democratic Party required ID to participate in a party function while stridently opposing requiring an ID to participate in an election?

No, the topic is trump's ignorance and sheer stupidity.

The topic is really about Democrats adopting contradictory positions; do as Democrats say, not as Democrats do.

No, it is not, if you want to discuss that, write an article.
 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Guide
5.1.12  bugsy  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.1.7    last year
No, because when they added the ID requirement in 2012 it was in direct response the the numerous death threats President Obama had received from right wing racists angered at having a black man in the oval office.

Got proof of this or it just your "out" as to why democrats want IDs at certain events but not others?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.13  Tessylo  replied to  pat wilson @5.1.6    last year

"You're straying off topic."

That's all some tRumpsters have, projection, deflection, denial, alternative reality/facts.  

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Guide
5.1.14  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  pat wilson @5.1.11    last year

do as Democrats say, not as Democrats do.

Like with Trump, a republican, saying mail in ballots result in fraud yet always votes by mail.

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Participates
6  PJ    last year

Whenever I start to doubt myself in any way I simply look to the President and then I feel like the smartest, brightest person in the world.....or at least the United States.

The real question isn't about how stupid can this president be but rather how much more stupid do you have to be to follow him.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Guide
6.1  seeder  pat wilson  replied to  PJ @6    last year

The stupidity is a bottomless well.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
7  Kavika     last year

As my sainted grandmother would say, ''the trouble with stupid people like that boy is there are full of confidence''

 
 
 
Greg Jones
PhD Expert
8  Greg Jones    last year

Once again, the left wing nitwits fail to get his joke.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Guide
8.1  seeder  pat wilson  replied to  Greg Jones @8    last year
the left wing nitwits fail to get his joke.

And there it is. So predictable. Trump fans will stand on their heads and spit wooden nickels to justify his idiocy.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Guide
8.1.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  pat wilson @8.1    last year

"I don't kid."  DJT

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
PhD Guide
8.2  Thrawn 31  replied to  Greg Jones @8    last year

It isn't a joke if it is so fucking stupid that no one understands it. 

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Principal
8.2.1  sandy-2021492  replied to  Thrawn 31 @8.2    last year

It's not so fucking stupid that no one understands it.  It's just fucking stupid.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Guide
8.3  seeder  pat wilson  replied to  Greg Jones @8    last year

He doesn't have the ability to form a coherent sentence much less a clever joke,

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
PhD Guide
9  Thrawn 31    last year

Donald Trump is mentally retarded.  Yes that is a declarative statement and there is nothing to read into. I am flat our saying Donald Trump is a mental retard. 

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Expert
9.1  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Thrawn 31 @9    last year

There is little doubt that he's had a stroke......  Remember the trip to Walter Reed?

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Guide
9.1.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @9.1    last year

That was to their dental department.  Dentists have access to some of the best pharmaceutical grade blow out there.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Principal
10  Buzz of the Orient    last year

I'm curious about an American legal matter, that perhaps someone can help me with.  I have no doubt Trump will do everything in his power, such as signing an executive order or commencing a court action before the vote to stifle mail-in ballots.  Is it possible to bring proceedings before the SCOTUS (even if by an immediate appeal from a lower court if no such direct action could be done) for a mandatory injunction from the SCOTUS that cannot be overrode or appealed that would prevent Trump from being able to prevent in any way mail-in balloting and the processing of same, no matter how long it takes to complete the count?

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Guide
10.1  seeder  pat wilson  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @10    last year

You need a professional opinion. Above my pay grade.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Principal
10.1.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  pat wilson @10.1    last year

I believe he will use every trick in the book plus whatever else his deranged mind can think up, whether legal or illegal, to stifle the votes for Biden.  He's desperate, and although he and his toady Pompous Pompeo are doing their damndest to deflect the public's attention away from his negligent mishandling of the virus towards building hatred for China and anything Chinese, surely Americans will realize his game.  Unfortunately there are Americans who LIKE his game, and we have a share of them right here on thenewstalkers. 

 
 
 
Duck Hawk
Freshman Silent
10.1.2  Duck Hawk  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @10.1.1    last year

ain't that the truth

 
 
 
Greg Jones
PhD Expert
10.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @10    last year

Back in the Bush-Gore election, the Democrats tried to have votes from the military thrown out.

But Trump has no legal standing or reason to do what you suggest.

I'm sure the Dems will contest the vote after Biden loses...again.

 
 
 
Account Deleted
Freshman Quiet
11  Account Deleted    last year
But multiple studies have shown that voter fraud in US presidential elections is extremely rare.

That should be phrased "successful" voter fraud.

Lot's of people probably register as Mickey Mouse - few of them show up to vote - I'm sure those that do have problems when they claim a Milwaukee home address.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online

JohnRussell
devangelical
Sparty On
Thomas
Tacos!


29 visitors