Texas' Abbott says Dems who 'fled' state over elections bill will be arrested upon return
Category: News & Politics
Via: vic-eldred • 5 years ago • 227 commentsBy: Edmund DeMarche (Fox News)
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Gov. Greg Abbott, the Texas Republican, criticized state Democrats who fled to Washington, D.C., on Monday in an effort to deprive the Legislature of a quorum, thus the ability to vote on the GOP's sweeping elections overhaul bill.
Abbott appeared on "The Ingraham Angle" on Monday to defend the bill and say the missing lawmakers will be arrested upon their return to the state. He said members of the Texas House of Representatives who are still in the state can call for the arrests of their colleagues who do not show up to vote. The one caveat is the arrest has to be made in the state.
"Once they step back into the state they will be arrested and brought back to the Capitol and we will be conducting business," he said.
Republicans argue the contentious bill would provide greater election security, while Democrats charge it would suppress voter turnout of minorities.
The exodus was the second time that Democratic lawmakers have staged a walkout on the voting overhaul, a measure of their fierce opposition to proposals they say will make it harder for young people, people of color and people with disabilities to vote.
But like last month's effort, there remains no clear path for Democrats to permanently block the voting measures, or a list of other contentious GOP-backed proposals up for debate.
"We have special sessions that last 30 days," Abbott said. "And the governor calls them, and I will continue calling special session after special session because over time it is going to continue until they step up to vote."
As they arrived in Washington Monday evening, the lawmakers said they would not be swayed.
"We are determined to kill this bill," said state Rep. Chris Turner, who said he and his colleagues were prepared to run out the clock on a special session that ends early next month.
Tags
Who is online
261 visitors
You mean that there is actually justice somewhere in America!
So... It's illegal to go to DC? Add another charge for the insurrectionists.
Just curious. What is the law that the lawmakers have contravened that calls for their arrest?
It's called a call of the House, a procedural move that would allow law enforcement to track down lawmakers who have already fled the chamber.
This is an example of the minority party using it's filibuster. In this case, the rules in Texas which were agreed to at the beginning of the legislative session cover how this can be handled and how it ends. Gov Abbott can continue to call special sessions (they only last 28 days) until this is resolved.
On a side note, if someone supports and applauds the Democrats for this tactic in Texas then they must also support keeping the filibuster as it is in the US Senate. The purpose is the same, to provide balance and leverage to the minority party so the majority party cannot run roughshod.
Okay, track them down, but what about ARRESTING them? In a way what the Democrats in the House are doing is "suppressing the vote" in the House as a defence against a proposed law suppressing the vote of the people. Quite ironic.
That's a false statement.
You're calling me a liar? If I was WRONG so be it and you can certainly tell me I'm wrong, but if you are going to say I made a false statement, then you are calling me a liar.
Oh Buzz, you know better than that. I'm calling your comment a lie. The same dirty lie that Joe Biden got 3 Pinocchios for!
There is NO 'law' Buzz. It is a House RULE and any arrest would be by the Sergeant at Arms of the House [or his designee], NOT the Governor.
You're saying something that is incorrect, call it what you will. Lies have been known to occur on these forums.
The proposed changes to the law DO NOT suppress voting access or opportunity to ANYONE, including minorities.
You're just parroting what the usual leftist liars have said.
The Governor never said he was going to do the honors.
More spin Dulay?
He sure as fuck implied that he had the authority to do so since he made NO mention of the House.
Note that the Texas House had yet to vote on a 'Call of the House' when he made that statement.
More projection Vic?
We don't all use explicit baby talk.
Note that the Texas House had yet to vote on a 'Call of the House' when he made that statement.
They blew it. It isn't like it was the first time democrats pulled this stunt. As in the 2020 election they got left at the gate.
More projection Vic?
Just the plain old truth. It really produces a nasty reaction at times, but I give it in full doses.
Please spare me from watching Ingraham.
QUOTE what Abbott said, NOT what the article said he said please.
WTF are you talking about Vic?
HOW does that address the fact that he made his threat before the Call of the House Vic? Hint: It doesn't.
Oh and BTFW, 'this stunt' has been used by both parties forever. In 1840, Lincoln famously jumped out of a second story window in order to deny a quorum in the Illinois House.
Again, WTF are you talking about?
I've pointed everyone to the proper post.
I'm sorry to hear it.
I assumed nothing.
Since they did so a day AFTER Abbott made his threat, your comment is moot.
Oh and the Democrats are doing exactly what they were elected to do, represent their constituents.
You should go look up projection Tex.
People simply don't talk that way.
HOW does that address the fact that he made his threat before the Call of the House Vic? Hint: It doesn't.
ACTUALLY he made it after. They should have already been arrested. That's the problem with Texas morals : A man has to be a gentleman or he's nothing at all! It doesn't seem to work with democrats.
Oh and BTFW, 'this stunt' has been used by both parties forever. In 1840, Lincoln famously jumped out of a second story window in order to deny a quorum in the Illinois House.
We never got over that one, did we?
Again, WTF are you talking about?
Oh, you know, when those Republican Legislatures let judges take away their right to make election law.
And? My answer to Buzz is factual. Stop trolling me Tex.
I bet I know who's picture is there.
Do you have that QUOTE yet Tex?
Still waiting for the quote from Abbott Tex...
Have you found the quote from Abbott yet?
Curtailing Sunday voting to those for whom it is the only time during the week that they are able to vote is called "voter suppression" in MY book, but not your Republican one, because it's not the Republicans who would be effected by that limitation.
Oh, okay, thanks for the heads up.
Sounds true to me. What, exactly, isn't true about it?
Five states (Alaska, Illinois, Maryland, New York and Ohio) allow for Sunday voting. Five states (California, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada and Massachusetts) leave it up to county clerks who may choose to be open on Sundays.
So your reasoning is that
1) Black people can only get to the polls on a Sunday?
2) All the blue states that don't allow Sunday voting are "Jim Crow racist" states?
Very strange logic, Buzz.
I believe Joe Biden called it "Jim Eagle laws!" I assume some guy in Scranton named Jim Eagle is asking himself "how am I to blame?"
One that Biden compared to the Civil War!
He said that's not hyperbole either!
Somebody needs to read the definition of hyperbole to Joe.
Know what, Vic (and thumb-upper Tex) what it comes down to is I really don't give a damn. You can have and enjoy your patchwork voting system with its hanging chads and ballot collection boxes, and voting machines, and computerization and drive-by voting and court-awarded wins and different kinds of marking pens and different kinds of ballots and whatever. To me, the only thing that makes sense is a NATION WIDE SINGLE SYSTEM for a federal vote, a SINGLE process, for every person no matter where they live, so there isn't room for the kind of debacles that have been taking place in the USA. In Canada, Provinces have independent rights as well, but when it comes to a federal election - there are NO variations, everything is the same, every polling place follows the same rules, and there are NO PROBLEMS.
Yeah, your system works pretty well, last November's election went as smooth as silk. You're ALL happy with it.
LOL. Yeah, seems to be a lot of people there who still think he didn't. In any event the whole scenario was a great show of how wonderfully American democracy works for the rest of the world to see.
Well, Canada for starters - maybe you can reread what I wrote in comment 2.1.47. How about New Zealand? It's so typical of conservatives to start to play down the fiasco of the November election and its aftermath in order to save their ass at the midterms.
Canada Television News (CTV), The MSN collection of US news articles from many mainstream soiurces. and the MSN collection of foreign news from many mainstream sources, US News and World Report, and many others, giving me the opportunity to see the "other side of the story" - I even read Fox News when I need something to make me laugh. How about you? Do you read China Daily or watch China Global Television network to get the "other side of the story" or is your mind closed to the possibility that there could actually BE another side of the story?
Forgot to say that I go through the MS Bing news roundup every morning when I turn on my computer. So how would YOU, Tex, describe the "Stop the Steal" movement and the multiple no-evidence court cases, and the repercussions such as the January 6th "tourist visit" of the Capitol Building, etc,...? Just another run-of-the-mill everyday type American election?
[Removed, that comment was totally unacceptable]
Ha ha ha!!! I remember Ed Broadbent. He could make Bernie Sanders appear as Generalissimo Franco. But I did notice that you would rather change the subject than answer my questions.
Removed for context by Charger
It is in the third sentence:
He said members of the Texas House of Representatives who are still in the state can call for the arrests of their colleagues who do not show up to vote.
Hats off to Texas for the real time exhibition of fascism. Kids learn best with real world examples.
The leftist ruling class knows about fascism. They held people in Jail for 6 months, mostly on trespassing charges. No trial in sight.
This from a guy who claimed that they were not chanting HANG MIKE PENCE!!!
What guy?
You, bud. The day it happened, right here on NT, you were denying what they were chanting. It’s like your brain wouldn’t let you hear what everyone else was so clearly hearing.
Well bud, PROVE YOUR CLAIM or should I say PERSONAL ATTACK.
That is a lie.
Prove it's a lie
24:52 - 29.05
Now, will you continue to close your mind to the FACTS Vic?
What is that supposed to mean?
Here are the facts:
People at the Capitol, not necessarily in the Capitol, on January 6th are in restrictive housing, aka solitary.
Elizabeth Warren (MA) and Dick Durbin (IL) spoke up against the harsh treatment of people taken into custody for the Jan. 6 Capitol “riot.”
MASS SOLITARYAccording to the Tennessee Star, the jail where some rioters /trespassers are kept, houses 1,500 inmates. They are confined to their jail cells 22 hours per day, an increase of one hour over what it was last month. They are prohibited from going outside.
Some of them are let out for recreation at 2 am due to COV.
A Washington Post report described the jail’s COVID-19 order as “mass solitary confinement.”
SOME ONLY TRESPASSED, OTHERS ARE HELD AND HAVEN’T BEEN CHARGEDAs to those being held for being present at the Capitol on Jan. 6, many are being held in pretrial detention on charges ranging from knowingly entering or remaining in restricted grounds (trespassing) without authority to conspiracy, assault, and obstruction of an official proceeding.
Some haven’t been charged with anything
Rep. James Comer (R-KY) expressed concerns about the conditions in the jail.
“D.C.’s house is not in order, and the solution is not to grant it even more authority through statehood,” Comer said on April 19.
That comment came in response to a Washington Post report which described the jail’s COVID-19 order as “mass solitary confinement.”
In arguing against D.C. statehood in an April 22 speech, Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA) also cited the same Post report. In that speech, Higgins alleged that the city had been “essentially torturing inmates” for over a year, and noted: “That is ultimately a violation of the 8th Amendment…is that what we can expect from a D.C. state?”
Meanwhile, communists and anarchists who burn down buildings and ICE buildings, beat police officers, get a night in jail and have charges dismissed.
FEW ARE ADVOCATING FOR THEMMayor Muriel Bowser and House Oversight Chair Carolyn Maloney won’t meet to discuss it.
A lawyer for Jan. 6 defendants told Politico that lawmakers should contact him if they were concerned about the inmates’ treatment. Marty Tankleff, himself exonerated after decades in prison for a wrongful murder conviction, told Just the News no one has contacted him nearly three weeks later.
His clients include Ryan Samsel, who alleges a prison guard beat him so badly he suffered permanent eye damage, and Edward Jacob Lang, an observant Jew who claims guards disparaged him as a “false prophet” as he prayed for other inmates.
Think about it, Dulay, even ideologues like Liz Warren and Dick Durbin think it's wrong!
Let's turn off the spin cycle.
Vic wants everyone to pick back through his hundreds of comments. Vic, Just say again that you dont think they were chanting hang mike pence or admit they were. Your choice, for the present.
Vic just wants people to address topic rather than resorting to personal attacks.
That would make these threads more interesting for our readers. Maybe some would even contribute. Think of that John.
First of all, there is NO 'leftist ruling class'. Just stop.
Have you forgotten how this shit works AGAIN Vic? YOU made the assertion, YOU have the burden of proof.
Here, I'll even give you a link to the DOJ list so you can prove to yourself just how many of your heroes have been released on bail, or on their own personal recognizance and when their next court date is scheduled.
Oh and BTFW Vic, note that NOT ONE of your heroes has been charged with 'trespassing' AND that the ONLY ones that have been 'committed' [jailed] for '6 months' were charged with carrying unregistered firearms, though YOU falsely claimed that NO ONE had a gun...
FACTS matter Vic, you should try posting some.
It was YOU who made the assertion that what I said was a lie. You have yet to disprove the proof of my statement which was posted for all to see in post # 3.1.8.
Here, I'll even give you a link to the DOJ list
That's nice of you but, my statement still stands untouched - post 3.1.8.
NOT ONE of your heroes has been charged with 'trespassing'
FALSE - post 3.1.8
FACTS matter Vic, you should try posting some.
FACTS do matter. Tell Biden and Garland.
Why are you replying to the video I posted that PROVES that the insurrectionists were chanting 'Hand Mike Pence' with links about the DOC?
I seriously doubt that you give a shit about the vast majority of the 1,500 inmates being held in that facility Vic.
Oh and if you think that those heroes of yours that remain committed should be treated differently than any other pre-trial detainee, you are wrong Vic.
No one will need to pick back through your hundreds of posts if you just say RIGHT NOW whether or not you think people in the Jan 6th crowd chanted "hang Mike Pence".
Simplicity itself.
GOOD Vic. YOU recognize that YOU made the initial assertion. Now PROVE it.
Why continue to post false comments Vic. READ the fucking link. It NAMES those arrested and their standing.
I know you adverse to actually READING statutes Vic but the charges against your heroes for ' Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building' is NOT 'trespassing'. It is predicated by:
So even YOU should be able to understand that the FACT that the VP Pence was @ the Capitol [among other protectees] AND that the Congress was conducting 'an event designated as a special event of national significance' and that the Federal government has a vested interest in codifying a statute to penalize anyone who threatens the VP or the Congress when doing so.
[ deleted ]
1) Anyone making a claim about my past comments should provide the comment.
2) I really can't say whether anyone chanted that or not. That particular day, I listened to the Trump speech and I was out the door & on the road. It was only when I returned home that I saw film of people entering the capitol building. I never got to hear chants made by various sectors of the crowd. I'm not denying that it happened. I simply never heard it. Maybe that's the source of the confusion about something I may have said in January?
Simplicity itself.
We can only hope.
I keep hoping to discuss topic.
I wish I could say as much for you.
Unfortunately most of those being held are being held for trespassing and I am forced to agree with Warren and Durbin - It is wrong.
Our Readers know what political prisoners are.
[deleted]
Keep wishing.
That comment is another lie Vic. Warren and Durbin did NOT argue against holding the 1/6 insurrectionists.
NONE of the insurrectionists are being held for trespassing. Why continue to post that LIE?
Those amongst 'Our Readers' who have a cogent grasp on reality know that not one of the insurrectionists is a 'political prisoner'.
What do you do, just make stuff up as you go along? They were against the harsh treatment of those people and it is NOT a lie. Read it again Dulay!
NONE of the insurrectionists are being held for trespassing.
Most are, despite the Garland descriptions.
Those amongst 'Our Readers' who have a cogent grasp on reality know that not one of the insurrectionists is a 'political prisoner'.
I beg to differ. They are much more intelligent than you give them credit for.
Those people as a WHOLE Vic, NOT the 1/6 insurrectionists for being held for trespassing as YOU claimed.
Obtuse. NONE are being charged with trespassing no matter how many times your rinse and repeat it Vic.
Merrick Garland was a Freshman in College when the statute used to charge your heroes was passed Vic. It's not his description, it's the LAW.
Then do so cogently, your comment misses that mark.
False. My comment gives them all the credit they deserve.
It's those whose posts prove that they have lost their grip on reality that I have an issue with.
during the past history of the USA we've liquidated millions of our enemies without due process while defending our way of life and the Constitution. adding 500+ domestic terrorists to that number wouldn't seem very significant. it's really very simple, those that didn't breach the capitol building were protesters, those that did breach it, were traitors.
Well bud, PROVE YOUR CLAIM or should I say PERSONAL ATTACK.
Everyone has used this tactic:
Oregon Senate Republicans walk out for 3rd straight year, citing governor’s COVID-19 restrictions
By leaving Texas, House Democrats avoided being arrested by a “Call of the House,” which Speaker of the House Dade Phelan could have initiated had the members left Tuesday, when the chamber is scheduled to be back in session. Because the legislature was out of session on Monday, Democrats had time to leave after having met over the weekend.
U.S. Republican Rep. Dan Crenshaw replied, tweeting, “Texas Democrats: ‘let’s keep lying about ‘voter suppression’ even though it has been debunked countless times, AND then we can skip work and take a charter jet to hang out with Pelosi in DC for a few days!’ Nice try. But no one believes your charade.”
Yes, yes Vic, doing the same thing = bad Democrats, but good Republicans. /S
But but but, it's ok when they do it, it was for a cause....
One of the Great Governors
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick also tweeted a picture of Democratic lawmakers, saying, “Smiling House Dems fly off to DC on a private jet with a case of Miller Lite, breaking House quorum, abandoning their constituents, while the Senate still works.”
Progressives in action or is it vacation?
off to DC on a private jet with a case of Miller Lite, breaking House quorum, abandoning their constituents and the Great state of Texas.
I think thats a bus, not a private jet.
Some of them were going to DC by bus.
What does that mean? How do you know that wasn't a bus to or from the airport.
I doubt they took a bus from Texas to DC.
I heard on a news report yesterday that some of them were going to DC by bus. I have to admit though that I dont have the proof on me and am not going to look it up just for your benefit.
Why do you care how they got there or what they were drinking?
If they did, God bless them.
Why do you care how they got there or what they were drinking?
I really don't, but when someone makes a point to say that is a bus ride, I get the impression that there is an attempt to contradict the entire seed. I'm not being paranoid. I've just happen to have a lot of experience here. They were on a bus and we don't know it they are going to or from the airport or the 21 hour, 1,533 mile bus ride from Austin Texas to Washington DC. I think we've covered it, right John?
A whole case of beer ... WOW!
There's probably 24 people on the bus so they each get one beer. Then again maybe they have 4 more cases out of camera view.
I have a thought - who cares?
About the only thing I care about there is that I really don't consider that beer. It's more slightly colored water...
Outside of that, really. Who cares... They are all adults there. So long as the law allows for open containers of alcohol then having a bottle or two while the bus heads down the road is no big deal.
I would have more respect for them if they had real beer... oh well...
I know some guys that will drink nothing but Miller Lite. When you drink 10 or 12 at a sitting you want something "lite'. By the way I am talking about people who are so successful they can go golfing whenever they want.
I have a brother who will go into the most expensive steak house in town and order a Miller Lite.
sigh.... so long as he doesn't use A-1 or some such steak sauce... I grew up with the belief that if you need steak sauce, that steak is too old to eat and you might as well give it to the dogs.
I mean, to each his own and if he likes drinking near-to-beer more power to him.
.
Wow....talk about fat and ugly!
It may be a requirement.
Could he mean Peter Townshend?
I think there is a lot of theater, on both sides, on the topic of voting legislation.
We should have more uniformity in voting procedures across the country. We should not have cases where a state or county can say "we are more conservative here so we need more conservative voting rules".
There used to be an election "day" because there wasnt the technology or the interest in having multiple times and methods for voting. Now there are, and the ability to vote should not be hindered. On the other hand, I dont think states need 15 or 20 early voting days, and I think there needs to be some eminently workable form of identification that the person who cast the vote is registered and is the person whose name is registered. A simple signature verification system can ensure that.
Mail in votes should not be sent out to people who do not request them, BUT it should not be against the rules for the election board to send out applications for a mail in ballot. Sending out the official ballot itself should not be permitted until an application is sent in by the voter, but sending out the application unsolicited is perfectly fine.
No state should have a piece of legislation that allows a committee consisting of the majority party in that state to reverse the results of an election on the premise that the election was "fraudulent". Such matters, should they exist, can ONLY be adjudicated in a recognized U.S. court, and definitely not by partisan committees associated with partisan state legislatures.
This stuff is not that difficult to figure out.
We once did. It was called voting in person on election day.
There used to be an election "day" because there wasnt the technology or the interest in having multiple times and methods for voting. Now there are, and the ability to vote should not be hindered. On the other hand, I dont think states need 15 or 20 early voting days, and I think there needs to be some eminently workable form of identification that the person who cast the vote is registered and is the person whose name is registered. A simple signature verification system can ensure that.
There is no signature verification system that can be as good as in person voting. In addition there are usually a percentage of mail in ballots that are discarded. That needs to be kept in mind.
Mail in votes should not be sent out to people who do not request them, BUT it should not be against the rules for the election board to send out applications for a mail in ballot. Sending out the official ballot itself should not be permitted until an application is sent in by the voter, but sending out the application unsolicited is perfectly fine .
Agreed.
No state should have a piece of legislation that allows a committee consisting of the majority party in that state to reverse the results of an election on the premise that the election was "fraudulent". Such matters, should they exist, can ONLY be adjudicated in a recognized U.S. court, and definitely not by partisan committees associated with partisan state legislatures.
Agreed.
However, we have just had an election held with an unprecedented number of mail-in-ballots. That is where we can learn a lot about mail-in-voting.
These were the key sates, (Places where Joe Biden did best):
As of Dec 6th 2020
Nevada: 33,596 votes separate Trump and Biden (2.4%), with six electoral votes at stake.
Nevada approved a plan in early August to mail ballots to all registered voters without request. That included dead voters, voters who had moved, or voters had otherwise become ineligible to vote.
In addition, live ballots for the taking reportedly piled up in the common areas of apartment complexes.
Campaign lawyer Jesse Binnall presented evidence Thursday that 1,506 votes came from dead people, 42,284 double ballots were cast, about 20,000 voters voted without having a Nevada mailing address, and 2,468 voters had changed their addresses to another state. Judge James Russell dismissed the lawsuit claiming lack of evidence.
Arizona: 10,457 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.3%), 11 electoral votes at stake.
Unlike Nevada, Arizonans are required to request an absentee ballot in order to vote by mail.
Arizona Republican Party Chairman Kelli Ward sought to reverse Biden's razor-thin victory under a state law that allows voters to dispute certified results if they suspect misconduct, illegal votes, or an inaccurate count.
Judge Randall Warner wrote "there is no evidence that the inaccuracies were intentional or part of a fraudulent scheme. They were mistakes. And given both the small number of duplicate ballots and the low error rate, the evidence does not show any impact on the outcome."
Ward said she intends to appeal.
Wisconsin: 20,682 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.7%), 10 electoral votes at stake.
Wisconsin is similar to Arizona, in that there is no universal mail-in voting. Registered voters must submit an application to receive a ballot and vote by mail.
Last week the Wisconsin Supreme Court declined to take up the Trump campaign challenge of the elections results, telling the lawyers that they should have brought the action first to a lower court. Three justices disagreed and wanted to hear the case.
"Petitioners assert troubling allegations of noncompliance with Wisconsin's election laws by public officials on whom the voters rely to ensure free and fair elections," wrote Justice Rebecca Bradley's dissent. "The majority's failure to embrace its duty (or even an impulse) to decide this case risks perpetuating violations of the law by those entrusted to follow it."
The campaign's chief Wisconsin lawyer in the state said that he expects "to be back in front of the Supreme Court very soon."
Michigan: 154,188 votes separate Trump and Biden (2.8%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Mail-in ballots in Michigan hit a record of 3.3 million of over 5 million ballots cast.
Yet, the state witnessed only a tiny number of rejected ballots, just 15,300 or .5 percent. Typically, the state sees a 1 percent rejection rate.
Much of Trump's recount focus has been on the software used in election machines.
This past week the Trump campaign had cause to celebrate when a Michigan judge ordered a forensic examination of 22 Dominion voting tabulation machines in Antrim County, where election officials first noticed that thousands of votes intended for the president went to Biden.
Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani believed it was a big win for honest elections.
"Antrim County Judge in Michigan orders forensic examination of 22 Dominion voting machines," he tweeted. "This is where the untrustworthy Dominion machine flipped 6,000 votes from Trump to Biden. Spiking of votes by Dominion happened all over the state."
Pennsylvania: 81,660 votes separate Trump and Biden (1.2%), 20 electoral votes at stake.
More than 2.6 million mail-in ballots were cast in the presidential race and Joe Biden won the group with 75% of the vote.
Rep. Mark Kelly, R-Pa., has filed suit to overturn the state's mail-in ballot rules and his action has caught the attention of the U.S. Supreme Court, which is seeking Pennsylvania officials to respond by December 8.
Pennsylvania created a mail-in ballot nightmare.
Prior to the general election, the state supreme court approved a three-day extension for the delivery of mail-in ballots, without requiring a postmark, as well as permitting the use of unmanned ballot drop boxes.
The court admitted that the order violated the state constitution, but said that the COVID outbreak necessitated the rule changes. They also violate the U.S. Constitution, which provides that state legislatures set the time, place, and manner of elections — not judges.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court later approved an executive order from Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, stating that county officials "are prohibited from rejecting absentee or mail-in ballots based on signature comparison," thus creating another alleged constitutional violation.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Trump has stated had the state used a simple signature verification match for all mail-in ballots, he would have easily one.
On Saturday speaking at a Valdosta, Georgia, rally in support of the state's two GOP senators, Trump blasted the general election's mail-in ballots as "phony" and "fake," and surveillance footage the campaign obtained from an Atlanta voting tabulation center appears to confirm that.
The footage appears to depict election officials scanning ballots obtained from suitcases stored beneath a table, after they had dismissed reporters and GOP watchers.
I don't think most Americans want to relive that one.
I have never voted other than in person and on election day. And I have been voting for almost 50 years and haver never missed voting in a general election.
Signature verification is the only voter identification they do in Illinois , even at the polling place on election day ! So just what the heck are you talking about. I have voted in dozens of elections , on election day, and have never shown my "ID" to anyone.
Back in the old days, each precinct had a big book , big physical three ring binder with the info and signatures of every voter in that precinct. When you signed a slip on election day, in front of the election judges, they checked your signature against the one in the book , which was made when you registered to vote. The same system is still in use with one change, now there is no three ring binder , the signatures are kept in a file on a laptop.
This system is ENTIRELY sufficient to prevent fraud, and can be adapted to account for mail in votes.
We KNOW that Republicans around the country want to cut down the Democratic vote because they have been telling us so for years.
The idea that only Democrats would scheme to vote as dead people, use double ballots, or vote without an address , and Republicans wouldnt do it, is utter nonsense.
What we 'learn' from the link is that Trump's legal team claimed to have a plethora of evidence and FAILED to produce ONE iota of it.
In FACT, in Michigan, Trump's legal team is facing sanction based on their 'bad faith' briefs and false filings.
Maybe you should remove that 6 month old link from your bookmarks. It's woefully outdated and actually documents the utter lack of evidence of voter fraud.
It's been discussed many times here that the ONLY ID verification that ANY state conducts is a signature verification. Even in states that require a photo ID, poll workers do NOT compare photos, they compare signatures.
What's utterly hilarious [read as hypocritical] about Vic's argument is that he has admitted that he is a mail in voter with a 'Good for me, not for thee' mentality.
History says otherwise. How long has Chicago had the democrat machine? How long did New York have Tammany Hall?
What really happen in 1960?
I'm afraid it's the same party that gave us secession. The democratic party is kind of like the young thug of American politics.
If Daley helped Kennedy in 1960, it was not by having thousands of people illegally cast ballots (which is virtually impossible given the presence of Republican election judges on the scene and verifying identities) it was by reporting vote totals for Kennedy above what they actually were. Political machines like that dont nickel and dime by having phony voters actually show up at polling places with fake id.
Nixon chose not to challenge the vote in Illinois.
He personally questioned it as did many observers. Nixon's reason for not contesting it was that it would be bad for the nation. That was then. Long before the time of Al Gore, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.
Gee, does that mean people were more civilized back then?
The states control elections within their states; and make the laws, rules, and procedures that must be adhered to. Not the Democrats in the damn federal government. States will not give up their rights any more to control their own elections; than they will give up the electoral college.
The 'damn federal government' is the one that mandates the electoral college.
And what is the procedure for eliminating it? That's right. 3/4 of the states and 2/3 of Congress. Thus, the states aren't going to give up the electoral college. No way 38 states are going to vote for that. There is a reason it is there and they aren't going to turn the country over to the coasts.
There is no need to eliminate the electoral college to skin that cat Jim.
The arbitrary cap on the number in the House, and therefore the number in the electoral college, can easily be changed by Congress. Since that cap was put in place, the population of Congressional Districts has more than tripled. Instead of a cap on the number of Representatives, there should be a cap on the amount of population that each Congressperson represents. That would ADD more Representatives and MORE representation of the ACTUAL population in the electoral college.
Or better still, we could simply say that due to "covid" we will mail out millions of unsolicited ballots hither & yon. Then we can total up the same day election ballots, post them so we know we need to win and then take as long as it takes to count up the millions of mail in ballots. That would ADD a lot more representation to the desired districts.
That never happened. Absentee ballots are matched to signatures plus canvassing and audits proved voter fraud was not a problem. It is easy to detect, highly illegal and impossible to pull off in ways that change elections...
Just like the FISA Warrants had a high standard of proof.
Here, rulings from 3 key states:
Strawman. I said easily changed NOT easily passed. Stop trolling me Tex.
Wow, that is a delusional comment Vic.
I presume that you meant 'know how many we need to win'. It's still delusional. There isn't one iota of evidence of election fraud, except of course the Republican guy that voted for his dead mom...
Each state has a codified date for certifying it's election Vic.
Tell you what, cite ONE state that missed it's state codified certification deadline.
Obtuse.
Strawman. I said easily changed NOT easily passed. Stop trolling me Tex.
I heard somewhere that passing legislation is what they are elected to do.
Whoosh, right over your head...
Point being it has to be passed to be changed. Whoosh right over your head indeed.................
LOL
They will keep calling special sessions again and again for the next yr and half
Be a long time on the lamb
Can't wait to see those fools arrested and cabined inside the state capitol as they watch these laws pass anyway.
This Just In:
"Texas House Speaker Dade Phelan on Wednesday called on state Democratic lawmakers to give up their daily stipend of $221 as they hunker down in Washington, D.C. to avoid passing a voting reform bill.
"While these Texas Democrats collect taxpayer money as they ride on private jets to meet with the Washington elite, those who remain in the chamber await their return to begin work on providing our retired teachers a 13th check, protecting our foster kids, and providing taxpayer relief," Phelan said in a statement Wednesday. "Those who are intentionally denying quorum should return their per diem to the State Treasury immediately upon receipt."
governor tea-party-shopping-cart is desperate to pass anything that looks like he accomplished something for the evicted 4th reich and put some distance between his past incompetence and his 2022 re-election bid.
I dont really follow Texas politics but I have a sister who lives in San Antonio and from time to time she fills me in on their incompetent state government.
As far as I can tell, Greg Abbott is one of the dumbest high level politicians in America. I said that to my sister and lets just say she did not disagree.
In conclusion:
Texas democrats have in a round about way used a filibuster. You know, the thing they want to do away with in DC.
Unfortunately we have to wait for the next election cycle.