Still in the game: Will Durham's report throw a slow curveball at key political players? | TheHill
Category: News & PoliticsVia: jbb • one month ago • 112 comments
By: Jonathan Turley (TheHill)
Nothing comes from nothing and nothing is all that John Durham has. He is now pitching wild unfounded untrue accusations to a grand jury claiming solid lifelong loyal employees of the FBI lied to the FBI at the beginning of the FBI's Russia probe. Basically, he is accusing them of doing their jobs because if they had not done what they did it would have been professional malfeasance. Do not expect anything to come of it except that innocent people's careers and reputations will be ruined, andrew McCabe, in the name of far rightwing conspiracy theories and Donald Trump. History will say Durham was a low down bum who was guilty of the exact kind of inappropriate political motivations that he and Trump falsely accused many other goid decent honest hard working government employees of being guilty of.
After all, in the end analysis, Andrew McCabe will be completely vindicated because he was not lying.
Trump lied. He was negotiating with the Russians to build a Trump Tower in Moscow all the way up to election day 2016. So, why isn't Trump in prison?
By Jonathan Turley, opinion contributor The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill Tweet Share More
Texas Rangers infielder Brock Holt went to the mound this week and threw an eephus — a high-arching, off-speed pitch — in a game against the Oakland Athletics. It is believed to be the slowest pitch recorded in MLB history, and A's batter Josh Harrison stood in disbelief as the 31 mph pitch was called a strike. Harrison just laughed in amazement.
Pirates outfielder Maurice Van Robays coined the term in the 1946 All-Star Game, explaining, "Eephus ain't nothing, and that's a nothing pitch." But as Holt demonstrated, sometimes a "nothing" slow pitch can amount to a great deal.
That is equally true about the occasional criminal eephus that takes everyone by surprise. For example, U.S. Attorney John Durham's investigation has been slow in coming, but on Friday, a report surfaced that he is pitching evidence to a grand jury in an investigation started back in May 2019. The Durham investigation is now longer in duration than former special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, and many people long forgot that Durham — made a special counsel at the end of the Trump administration — was even still in the game.
The report in The Wall Street Journal said Durham is presenting evidence against FBI agents and possibly others in the use of false information or tips at the start of the Russia investigation in 2016. Those "others" could include a virtual who's who of Washington politics, and even if they are not indicted, Durham could implicate some of the most powerful figures in politics in his final report, expected in the coming months.
Even for those of us who followed and wrote on the Russia investigation for five years, much has been revealed in the last year. It was disclosed in October, for instance, that President ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaFormer Sen. Heller to run for Nevada governorOvernight Energy & Environment — Presented by Climate Power — Senate Democrats ding Biden energy proposalBusiness coalition aims to provide jobs to Afghan refugeesMORE was briefed by his CIA director, John Brennan, on July 28, 2016, on intelligence suggesting that Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonPennsylvania GOP authorizes subpoenas in election probeWe must mount an all-country response to help our Afghan alliesBiden nominates ex-State Department official as Export-Import Bank leaderMORE planned to tie then-candidate Donald TrumpDonald TrumpFormer Sen. Heller to run for Nevada governorOvernight Defense & National Security — Milley becomes lightning rodJoint Chiefs Chairman Milley becomes lightning rod on rightMORE to Russia as "a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server." The date was significant because the Russia investigation was initiated July 31, 2016, just three days later.
Throughout the campaign, the Clinton campaign denied any involvement in the creation of the so-called Steele dossier's allegations of Trump-Russia connections. However, weeks after the election, journalists discovered that the Clinton campaign hid payments for the dossier made to a research firm, Fusion GPS, as "legal fees" among the $5.6 million paid to the campaign's law firm. New York Times reporter Ken Vogel said at the time that Clinton lawyer Marc Elias, with the law firm of Perkins Coie, denied involvement in the anti-Trump dossier. When Vogel tried to report the story, he said, Elias "pushed back vigorously, saying 'You (or your sources) are wrong.'" Times reporter Maggie HabermanMaggie Lindsy HabermanJuan Williams: Trump's coup attempt should bar him from 2024 raceStill in the game: Will Durham's report throw a slow curveball at key political players?The Hill's 12:30 Report - Presented by Facebook - Officers give grueling, horrific accounts of Jan. 6MORE declared, "Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year."
It was not just reporters who asked the Clinton campaign about its role in the Steele dossier. John Podesta, Clinton's campaign chairman, was questioned by Congress and denied categorically any contractual agreement with Fusion GPS. Sitting beside him was Elias, who reportedly said nothing to correct the misleading information given to Congress.
It was later revealed that American intelligence viewed Steele as unreliable and believed his dossier was used by Russian intelligence to plant disinformation. Later reports show that Steele shopped the information to any reporters who would listen before the election and that there was an effort to get the information to trusted figures in the Justice Department.
This cross-pollination between the campaign and the Justice Department was evident in the strange role of Bruce Ohr, a senior Justice official who was later demoted for concealing his meetings with people pushing the Steele dossier; his wife, Nellie Ohr, worked for Fusion GPS as a researcher on Trump's purported connections to Russia. Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz subsequently found that Bruce Ohr acted improperly and committed "consequential errors in judgment."
Others are reported in some media accounts to be in Durham's crosshairs, including an analyst at the liberal Brookings Institution, Igor Danchenko, who was a source for part of the dossier and the subject of a Durham subpoena. Danchenko has been linked to a source viewed by American intelligence as a conduit for Russian disinformation and reportedly was investigated as a possible national security threat, according to at least one news report.
Durham also is reportedly looking into information concerning Alfa Bank, a privately owned commercial bank in Russia. That information led to possible access to the Trump campaign server. The Alfa Bank controversy is likely to make a number of powerful people particularly uneasy. Clinton campaign-linked figures such as Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson allegedly pushed the debunked claim that the Trump campaign had a server linked directly to the bank, which in turn was linked to Vladimir PutinVladimir Vladimirovich PutinThe Hill's Morning Report - Presented by National Industries for the Blind - Schumer: Dem unity will happen eventually; Newsom prevailsOvernight Hillicon Valley — Ex-US intel operatives pay to settle hacking chargesGeneral promises 'surge' to fight ransomware attacksMORE and his cronies. The Alfa Bank conspiracy reportedly was pitched to the Justice Department, including in contacts with Bruce Ohr.
For many individuals, the statute of limitations may have passed on any alleged crimes. But the truth brought to light in any final report could result a public indictment of sorts.
Attorney General Merrick GarlandMerrick GarlandWoman allegedly abused by Nassar after he was reported to FBI: 'I should not be here'Democrat rips Justice for not appearing at US gymnastics hearingDOJ asks judge to block Texas from enacting abortion lawMORE may face some pressure to refuse to reauthorize a continuation of the Durham investigation, but he is likely to continue that support. After all, the Mueller investigation and various damaging investigations targeting Trump officials were approved and protected by his predecessor, William BarrBill BarrMilley moved to limit Trump military strike abilities after Jan. 6, Woodward book claims: reportFormer US attorney enters race for governor in PennsylvaniaFamilies of 9/11 victims hope for answers about Saudi involvement in attacksMORE.
The final fight may be over the report itself. Many in Congress and the media may not want it to see the light of day since it is likely to be an indictment not just of the FBI but of the establishment and an enabling media. Yet these same figures demanded "full transparency" over the Mueller report, including secret grand jury material barred from release under federal law. Even in a city that lives on political spin, reversing that narrative to demand secrecy or major redactions may be difficult to achieve in front of an increasingly distrustful public.
Thus, John Durham may be the slowest pitcher of all major league federal prosecutors — but a wide array of powerful people are afraid they may be called out at the plate by what he is about to let fly.
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. You can find his updates on Twitter @JonathanTurley.