The Russia probe: A timeline from Moscow to Mueller - ABC News

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  jbb  •  3 weeks ago  •  26 comments

By:   George W. Bush, Rosemary Collyer (ABC News)

The Russia probe: A timeline from Moscow to Mueller - ABC News
This is an extensive account of the federal counterintelligence probe, laid out in a detailed timeline.

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JBB    3 weeks ago

Our Intelligence agencies were investigating Trump's secret dealings with known clandestine operatives of Russian intelligence services long before 2016...

Trump was colluding with Russia to build Trump Tower Moscow right up to election day in 2016...

Our Intelligence agencies were doing their jobs...

Trump colluded with the Russians, lying about it.

Trump attempted to bribe Putin with a penthouse.

Considering that, the Trump Russia Probe was not only justified and legit it was ongoing before 2016.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
PhD Expert
2  Greg Jones    3 weeks ago

And Mueller cleared Trump of any wrongdoing 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
2.1  Dulay  replied to  Greg Jones @2    3 weeks ago

MUELLER: 'If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so'

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Dulay @2.1    3 weeks ago

It is insane that we have to go through these things endlessly with these people. 

America is truly fucked. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.1    3 weeks ago

It is insane and it's fucking tiresome

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Senior Principal
2.1.3  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Dulay @2.1    3 weeks ago

But yet they didn't have enough confidence to say he did commit a crime either. Checkmate.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
2.1.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  Dulay @2.1    3 weeks ago

He was, of course, referring to possible obstruction charges. It has nothing to do with Trump and  Russia. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
2.1.5  Dulay  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.1.3    3 weeks ago

It's always hilarious to see you and yours breaking your arms patting yourselves on the back even when your comment fails miserably. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Senior Principal
2.1.6  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Dulay @2.1.5    3 weeks ago

How did it fail? Did they say he did commit a crime? NOPE

 
 
 
Gsquared
Junior Principal
2.1.7  Gsquared  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.4    3 weeks ago

It has everything to do with Trump and Russia.  What do you think he was trying to cover up with his obstruction?

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
2.1.8  Dulay  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.4    3 weeks ago
He was, of course, referring to possible obstruction charges. It has nothing to do with Trump and  Russia. 

Some of the obstruction charges were directly connected to Trump and Russia. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
2.1.9  Dulay  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.1.6    3 weeks ago

Mueller DID say:

We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime. The introduction to the volume two of our report explains that decision. It explains that under long-standing Department policy, a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view, that too is prohibited. The special counsel’s office is part of the Department of Justice and by regulation it was bound by that Department policy. Charging the president with a crime was, therefore, not an option we could consider.

[deleted]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
2.1.10  Sean Treacy  replied to  Dulay @2.1.8    3 weeks ago
of the obstruction charges were directly connected to Trump and Russi

Not a single possible incident of corruption related to any alleged underlying crime with Russia. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
2.1.11  Sean Treacy  replied to  Gsquared @2.1.7    3 weeks ago
What do you think he was trying to cover up with his obstruction?

He was trying to end an investigation into charges of which he was innocent hat was crippling his Presidency.  Frustration with a witch hunt is typical among innocent people. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.12  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dulay @2.1.9    3 weeks ago

<raises hand>

I'm confused by it. Does that mean if a POTUS commits capital murder in the White House,

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
2.1.13  Dulay  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.10    3 weeks ago

Your comment was about OBSTRUCTION, not corruption Sean. Why try to deflect now? 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
2.1.14  Dulay  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.11    3 weeks ago
He was trying to end an investigation into charges of which he was innocent hat was crippling his Presidency. 

Bullshit Sean. READ the obstruction charges. 

Do you actually think that Trump believed that firing Comey and/or Mueller would 'end the investigation'?

Trump wanted to CONTROL the outcome of the investigation AND the testimony of those who he was afraid would expose his skeletons. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
2.1.15  Dulay  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.12    3 weeks ago

Unfortunately, that is EXACTLY what it means. 

Per the DOJ guidelines, they would have to impeach before they could prosecute. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
2.1.16  Dulay  replied to  Dulay @2.1.9    3 weeks ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Gsquared
Junior Principal
2.1.17  Gsquared  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.11    3 weeks ago

The idea that Trump is "innocent" of anything is laughable.

If he wasn't trying to cover up his collusion with Russia, he was trying to cover up his tax fraud.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.18  Texan1211  replied to  Gsquared @2.1.17    3 weeks ago
If he wasn't trying to cover up his collusion with Russia, he was trying to cover up his tax fraud.

Amazing what some people are still willing to believe!

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.1.19  Ozzwald  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.18    3 weeks ago

Amazing what some people are still willing to believe!

It's amazing what the GOP believed too...yet did nothing.

G.O.P.-Led Senate Panel Details Ties Between 2016 Trump Campaign and Russia

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.20  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @2.1.19    3 weeks ago

Ya'll have pushed that bogus Russia thing for years now.

Give it a rest already or actually PROVE something besides innuendo and allegations and unfounded, unproven crap.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.1.21  Ozzwald  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.20    3 weeks ago
Give it a rest already or actually PROVE something besides innuendo and allegations and unfounded, unproven crap.

You would accept no proof whatsoever.  So why try, the evidence is out there for anyone with a computer and an open, honest, mind.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.22  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @2.1.21    3 weeks ago

Thank you so much for confirming the veracity of my post so quickly!

Appreciate it!

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Senior Principal
3  Just Jim NC TttH    3 weeks ago

Argument didn't hold water elsewhere So let's start a new seed. Good move.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online



zuksam


24 visitors