The most important election that so few know of
![](http://thenewstalkers.com/image/img/module/ntArticle/quote.png?skin=ntNewsTalkers3&v=1701664066)
Link to Quote: House candidate Susanna Gibson performed sex acts on webcam for ‘tips’ (nypost.com)
Other that the story from Town Hall, which I posted yesterday, there hasn't been a story on the election going on in Virginia that will determine which party will have the majority in the VA state legislature. The leftist media has only covered the story when absolutely forced to do so. Here on NT, almost on cue from "Mother Jones," we have had multiple stories on the private life of Rep. Lauren Boebert. When one considers the way democrats are laser focused on key elections, it is kind of telling how little mileage is associated with this story.
I'm here to inform our readers about that contest. Right now, the democrat candidate, Susana Gibson, a mother of two young children, has been offering up sex videos with her husband on an adult streaming website called Chaturbate. Many of these films were posted on the website Recurbate after she declared her candidacy. She asked for money from the subscribers.
If you get all your news from NT, you'd never know about it.
I find it interesting that democrats who depend on scandals, (real or imagined) among other things, to take down their opponents have so little to say about this. I can only assume that Virginia voters do know quite a bit about this story. Ms Gibson is running against Republican David Owen. Virginia’s 57 th District is regarded as a toss-up. I hope the voters will do the right thing, but I no longer expect it.
Lauren Boebert is off topic
“Conscience doth make cowards of us all.”
― William Shakespeare, Hamlet
it seems like only rwnj thumpers give a fuck what people do in their private sex lives, unless it's trump...
Sure thing, must be why so many leftwingers commenting on that other story, huh?
Private? Isn’t she and her husband accused of livestreaming sex acts on “Chaturbate,” where they couple solicited “tips” for performing requested moves?
Not according to a recent article you posted.
BTW Gibson made it public
Thanks as always dev for the truth on what's going on here.
Gibson gave up her "private sex life" when she posted her sex videos on the Internet and solicited money. At that point, she became a prostitute.
Why do you continue to dox this woman? dev pointed out to us that someone took/hacked/doxed this Susanna's confidential and private information and used it to smear her. And what this has to do with anything, like a similar 'article' to this the other day - is beyond me.
It seems that the Washington Post doxed her. Please see comment 2.3 ...
First you need to learn what doxing is.
Another thing you need to know is posting pictures online makes them public.
Vic, for those who have the inability to look up an actual definition, maybe we need to publish the definition of "doxing".
Hopefully they'll read it.
Comprehending it is a whole other problem.
This is their moment. I'm praying for the nation.
You more optimistic on this that I am.
I dont think that most Americans give a damn which party controls the Virginia legislature. Whats going on there? The Republicans pledging to gerrymander the shit out of the place if they get the majority?
You seem to be obsessing over an election that no one outside Virginia cares about. What are you trying to distract everyone away from?
Here is what it means:
In other words, Gibson can scarcely afford to have her candidacy bruised by a scandal. And Democrats can scarcely afford to forfeit a winnable seat in the state Legislature. They need to win a majority in either the House of Delegates or the Senate if they are to have any chance of blocking the GOP’s agenda in Virginia.
Susanna Gibson’s unexpected scandal could lose Virginia Democrats the state Legislature. (slate.com)
and?
There 50 state legislatures in America. Not very often do state legislature elections become national news.
Yep, that's what political parties do when they hold the majority when it's time to redraw the voting maps. I do hope you are not trying to imply that Democrats don't do the exact same thing when they are able to.
But it does seem to have implications beyond the borders of Virginia.
So senior ethics counsel for the White House's Presidential Personnel Office donated money to her campaign AFTER she posted the videos.
Seems to me she's being pretty democratic in her lifestyle. As Monty Wildhorn (Morgan Freeman) said in the movie The Magic of Belle Isle: "I respect consistency."
Speaking of lifestyle:
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) quietly has directed the Senate's Sergeant at Arms to no longer enforce the chamber's informal dress code for its members, Axios has learned.
Why it matters: The new directive will allow Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), who tends to favor gym shorts and hoodies over the business attire traditionally required in the chamber, to linger on the Senate floor before and after votes.
![1694819040520.jpg?w=1920](https://images.axios.com/zJrI3HGT5OahIN7Dd6d_n5F1-pU=/0x0:8006x4503/1920x1080/2023/09/15/1694819040520.jpg?w=1920)
Schumer ditches the Senate's dress code (axios.com)
Okay, I get the message even though I can't open either the picture or the link, but now it's almost 10 p.m. and my eyes are closing anyway.
Dressing like a grown up makes him sad, so he won’t. But the people who do the actual work in the senate (the staff) still have a dress code. Democrats never change.
Although Senators are no longer forced to wear business attire, visitors to the Senate chamber must wear business attire. From what I've heard, Fetterman cast his previous votes from the Senate doorway (whenever he was lucid and cognitively capable), because he was wearing his hoodie and shorts.
Rather strange that a first year junior senator holds that much power over Schumer and other senior senators.
So Vic, Boebert is off limits, but Fetterman isn't? Because one is a Republican, one a Democrat?
Think FFS.........................what do they possibly have as a sort of commonality that Fetterman doesn't.
Meh, one man's pornography is another man's wife.
Stormy Daniels, Kamala Harris and now Susana Gibson. What is the deal with Democrats and sex workers?
Gender confusion, penis envy, or just admiration?
Seems most we see on the left are confused by the smell of air.
They're already confused about what gender they are. My guess is that they don't know what a penis is.
With all their confusion, I don't know what they would be "admiring". Remember, they support a "Chomo" as POTUS.
They are tired of getting only what they can afford?
We all know Democrats are in bed with special interests. And we know why. But this takes crowdfunding to a new level.
Now that Susana Gibson's small donor fundraising has gone mainstream maybe Democrats can expand it to the Disney channel.