Trump campaign raises more than $50 million at Florida fundraiser
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Former President Trump's campaign team says it raised more than $50 million at a Saturday evening's GOP fundraiser in Palm Beach, Florida, smashing records for a Republican or Democratic candidate.
"It took three Democrat presidents to raise $25 million and one president to raise over $50 million, Donald J. Trump," campaign spokesperson Danielle Alvarez boasted.
Heavy-hitters
Saturday's fundraiser took place at a private home in Palm Beach, hosted by billionaire and hedge fund founder John Paulson. Among the 100 or so guests will be heavy-hitters like casino mogul Steve Wynn, Bigelow Aerospace Founder and President Robert Bigelow, and former U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross.
Former President Donald Trump pumps his fist as he arrives for a GOP fundraiser, Saturday in Palm Beach, Fla. (AP Photo/Lynne Sladky)
"The response to our fundraising efforts has been overwhelming, and we've raised over $43 million so far," Paulson said in a statement. "There is massive support amongst a broad spectrum of donors."
Speaking briefly to reporters as he arrived at the event with his wife, Melania Trump, the former president said, "this has been some incredible evening before it even starts because people - they wanted to contribute to a cause of making America great again, and that's what's happened."
Though the fundraiser is expected to take in tens of millions, Trump still needs to close the gap with his Democratic rival, incumbent President Biden, who is reported to have around $192 million on hand compared with just over $93 million for Trump.
Biden event snags $26M
Biden's campaign said he raised more than $26 million during a fundraising appearance late last month at New York City's famed Radio City Music Hall with former Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton.
ACLU THREATENS TO SUE GEORGIA OVER ELECTION BILL CONSERVATIVES PRAISE AS 'COMMONSENSE' REFORM
The president's re-election campaign called the money raised at the star-studded event — which set a record for a single fundraiser — "historic."
Trump's event, billed as the "Inaugural Leadership Dinner," sends a signal of a resurgence for the former president and Republican Party fundraising.
Trump initially struggled to attract big donors when he launched his campaign and some lined up to support the other Republicans who challenged him in the presidential primary. But as Trump racked up easy wins, leveled the field and became the party's presumptive nominee, the GOP has solidified behind him.
Laura Trump speaks at the NCGOP state convention with former President Donald Trump.(Melissa Sue Gerrits/Getty Images)
Contributions to the event will go toward the Trump 47 Committee, according to the invitation, a joint fundraising agreement with the Republican National Committee, state Republican parties and Save America, a political action committee that pays the bulk of Trump's legal bills.
Big contributions
In an unusual arrangement, the fundraising agreement directs donations to first pay the maximum allowed under law to his campaign and Save America before the RNC or state parties get a cut.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Guests are asked to contribute $814,600 per person as a "chairman" contributor, which comes with seating at Trump's table, or $250,000 per person as a "host committee" contributor.
Both options come with a photo opportunity and a personalized copy of Trump's coffee table book featuring photographs from his administration, "Our Journey Together."
Three of Trump's former rivals for the GOP nomination — South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum and biotech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy — are expected to appear as "special guests."
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Bradford Betz is a Fox News Digital breaking reporter covering crime, political issues, and much more.
Tags
Who is online
81 visitors
It was only last Sunday when we heard Donna Brazile (on "This Week") brag about Biden's NYC fundraiser that brought in what was thought to be a record for a single fundraiser of $25 million. As predicted by Trump, he would outraise that number in the Florida fundraiser hosted by John Paulsen.
The Trump campaign is still far behind the Biden campaign in money raised overall, but that is typical these days as democrats have more large donors.
Brings to mind what P.T.Barnum is reputed to have said....
I believe Biden supporters were born every half minute.
You mentioned both in your comment - I wasn't being specific.
I know who you meant though
... the grift continues.
gee, looks like melania, lara, and kim will be going thru a lot of lip balm and tic tacs....
I wonder how many white nationalists donated....along with racists, fascists, etc.
Why would democrats be sending money to trump, the party of the klan supports their own.
The majority - they are the former 'president's' major supporters.
Is this money for the campaign or for the multi-faceted Trump Defense Fund?
Defense fund or just plain old graft? We never got an explanation for the twenty odd million dollars that disappeared from Trump's first inauguration fund...
Excellent point - over the decades I have often wondered how much "campaign money" contributions were the actual beginning balance of the politician's multi-million-dollar fortune
I know the SEC does keep a close eye on that. There's no law that says when a politician decides to not run for re-election they must give up any campaign money they currently hold. For example, Kyrsten Sinema has $10.4 million in her campaign accounts yet is not running for re-election.
Sen. Kyrsten Sinema - Campaign Finance Summary • OpenSecrets
But there are also laws that set how the money may be spent and it's fairly lenient in those regards which is how Trump has been able to spend all that PAC money on his legal defenses.
That eliminates Biden. His fortune came from influence peddling to America's enemies.
Like Saudi Arabia, Russia and China? Oh wait that was trump, never mind.
the resolute desk was in the oval sales office of the west wing, the waiting area was in trump's DC hotel.
Yet, unlike Trump, Joe and Jill Biden's taxes are public going back for decades. So, you need to prove outrageous accusations...
Thus, I am asking you, James Comer and Jim Jordan this, again!
the 8k golden boy of team golden shower, now tarnished and forgotten...
What about the unreported bribes and the under the table payoffs?
Prove it.
Both would come under the campaign. After all, the 4 cases are obviously political.
It is all part of the democrat strategy of win at any cost.
How exactly is the Jan 6th case or the classified documents case political and thus without merit?
In both cases, Trump was indicted based on his behavior in contrast to established law.
The Jan 6 case counts:
Count 1: 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Conspiracy to Defraud the United States)
Count 2: 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k) (Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding)
Count 3: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2), 2 (Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding)
Count 4: 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights)
And on the classified documents case, Trump obstructed the safe return of the documents. If he had cooperated as did Pence and Biden, he would have not been indicted and his holding of classified documents likely would have never been news in the first place.
Obviously, because it was scheduled for the election and the prosecutor is obsessed with getting a trial and verdict in before the election.
What was the DOJ policy on trials during a national election?
No, it is not obvious, it is not even coincidental. Trump wanted this to happen. Trump started his campaign super early so that he could capitalize on the likelihood that he was going to be indicted and say, as he has always done, "Poor me. Look at them pick on poor me. Send me your money. Poor me. It is all a witch hunt. Poor Me. I am so very rich. Send me More Money. Poor Me."
trump has been successful delaying due process until now. an innocent person would've wanted a speedy trial.
back then, almost the same as the senate policy on SCOTUS confirmations. looks like things can change, huh?
your hero is looking at life in club fed and the clock is running out on copping a plea.
Do you ever consider that the charges against Trump have clear merit?
Trump would not be under indictment if he would have accepted the recount facts of the 2020 election and graciously conceded as have every other PotUS in our history. But he did not. He engaged in (relatively outrageous, historically extreme) practices that are arguably (determined by a trial) unconstitutional and illegal.
I have always suspected (strongly) that the only reason Trump is running for PotUS is to help him deal with his many legal liabilities.
he's definitely chasing the protection of presidential immunity, as evidenced by his defense in every indictment.
Certainly. He cannot deny what he did in a court of law so he is trying to claim that he was above the law.
He tried this right off the bat with the classified documents. (Stupidly, by the way.) Remember how he first tried to claim that he had declassified all of the documents? Then, when challenged, claimed that a PotUS can declassify by simply deciding this (in his head). Just ridiculous nonsense that caused him to shoot himself in the foot by admitting he knowingly held classified documents and was obstructing their safe return.
It is amazing that this clown has been able to skirt so many legal challenges. Just goes to show how money funding smart attorneys can slip through cracks in our legal system.
“…to shoot himself in the foot…”
…a Fifth Avenue freeze out…
He is preying for it (sic)
lie, deny, delay...
You are certain to have a NY conviction which will be overturned on appeal.
To most people it is.
Trump started his campaign super early so that he could capitalize on the likelihood that he was going to be indicted and say, as he has always done, "Poor me. Look at them pick on poor me. Send me your money. Poor me. It is all a witch hunt. Poor Me. I am so very rich. Send me More Money. Poor Me."
So, either the democrats lawfare strategy backfired or Trump is a political genius.
Got it.
How am I able to do that? Everything done reeks of bias & weaponization of the law.
Was Jack Smith properly appointed? Is anything he does now legal?
Why is he obsessed with a trial & verdict before the election?
Why is the only real judge being criticized by the leftwing media?
I have always suspected (strongly) that the only reason Trump is running for PotUS is to help him deal with his many legal liabilities.
That is the projection & narrative of the left. The real reason for the race to a conviction was revealed in a New York Times Poll: Trump loses considerable support if he is convicted of something.
Let's see, you couldn't answer my question on the DOJ's policy on prosecuting candidates during an election, I wonder if you can answer the questions posed here.
He manages to do that every day, yet he leads in every battleground state. (He is tied in one.)
Very easy Vic.
Your questions show that you have no intent of objectively reviewing. You are simply trying to find ways to confirm your already well established political bias.
There is a difference between could not and would not. DOJ policy has absolutely no bearing on whether the indictments have merit. You were deflecting then and are doing it yet again here.
I am intentionally NOT going to answer your new list of questions since they are clearly just deflection.
Do the research, Vic. You are perfectly capable of coming to an objective opinion on whether the Jack Smith indictments have merit or not. And then you can make an argument as to why those indictments do not have merit when compared to the actual cited law and the publicly available evidence.
the first criminal trial of a former president in the history of the usa starts next week.
Your kidding right? You don't. Really believe that?
It is sickening to see someone pretend that Trump did nothing wrong. This guy, while PotUS, attempted to steal a US presidential election through fraud, coercion, lying, and incitement and you pretend he did nothing wrong.
The replican party's word of the month. Last month everything was "woke" and the month before it was all about "transgender".
The replican party doesn't have policies, just propaganda.
No, I don't ignore all that surrounds something dirty to determine if a single element might be clean.
This particular case is no longer the important one. It is the New York one that will go to trial this month. The only one before the election. All the New York cases were meritless, but you'll get a conviction and then it will be overturned on appeal - hopefully before the election.
No, not really. Most people believe the truth and your contention is false, no matter how stressfully you make it.
Read the report. The testimony is backing for the paper trail. Trump is a traitor to the Constitution and his oath of office. Only fools believe otherwise.
I don't think that those are the only two options, so that is a false dichotomy. I think that the reason that it has taken so long to get the cases lined out against Trump is out of an over-abundance of caution. Basically, most cases were held off because the DOJ and assorted prosecutors did not want to appear overzealous and they treated him with far more leniency than he ever deserved. He should be in jail now. Everybody bent over backwards to give him the benefit of the doubt when they should have been nailing his metaphorical ass to the wall.
No, you post the dirty all on your own and try to make it look like something not-dirty. It is standard Trump and minions MO: Accuse everybody of doing what you are doing and have done.
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
Damn those little dogs.
unfortunately, Biden who wished to reunite a divided country, held the DOJ back a bit, and did not go rampantly after the pos
Thanks, I needed a good laugh today.
The 4 cases, just like the Jan 6th Committee are tainted by bias to the core.
Damn it, we all have functioning brains.
Could have fooled me. I think some people around here are delusional.
This statement quoted proves it.
Why don't you do a little reading? It is not just a case of saying "guilty" or "not guilty". There is a paper trail a mile long that shows what Trump did and when he did it. There is corroboration by many witnesses. He was definitely trying to abrogate the will of the voters by lying and subterfuge. Slice it any way you want: Trump engaged in a conspiracy to ignore the Constitution and the voters to emplace himself in the role of PotUS that he was and is not entitled to.
So did I.
How about you?
What happened to the drivers testimony?
What happened to the House policy of appointing members?
What happened to the evidence of Trump suggesting the National Guard?
It would seem that you have a lot to catch up on.
What happened to Rami-Swami's testimony?
All of their testimony could not undo the mountain of testimony and evidence that says Trump tried to remain in office illegally. I am not going down those rabbit holes again. I have already addressed and discarded them elsewhere. Just give it up. He is guilty and crying won't change a thing.
Read the report.
Blah Blah Blah
You post Trumps words like they somehow indicate truthfulness.
Trump is guilty. Read the report.
Ha ha ha ha ha
When dealing with an indictment and a trial, the single most important element is the wrongdoing itself.
You are ignoring the wrongdoing and pretending all of this is simply political just as Trump expected you (writ large) would. That is very likely the main reason he is running — to play his base.
Of course, if your nominee is under indictment it could not possibly be due to his own wrongdoing. It must be 'them', 'those guys' who are creating bullshit indictments based on invented charges and gross misinterpretation of the law.
You ask peripheral questions while ignoring the 800lb gorilla in the room.
For example, was former Arizona Speaker Rusty Bowers lying when he stated under oath that Trump wanted him to submit fake electors for the state of Arizona? Is Pence lying about Trump trying to suborn him to engage in an unconstitutional act of tabling certified election results from select states that he lost? These, and others, are the critical questions. Trump's wrongdoing (or not) is the focus.
You are on a mission looking for (confirmation bias) evidence that there is foul play by others while categorically ignoring ALL the evidence of wrongdoing by Trump.
The trial will not do that (if it ever happens). The trial will focus on Trump's wrongdoings. If he violated the law then a fair trial will find him guilty based on the evidence. That is how our system is supposed to work.
Meanwhile, I fully expect Trump supporters to deny the trial, call it rigged, call it political, etc. Pure partisan nonsense by those who claim support for the rule of law.
Do you actually believe what Trump claims???
In other words the same as election denier Democrats including Hillary. Please remind us all how many indictments she faced for it?
She is still spewing her insanity that she won in 2016.
That's it? A feeble deflection to 2016? And then you equate Trump's attempt to steal the election with Hillary's whining?
Didn't you know that a Dem whining they lost is exactly the same as Republicans illegally signing fake documents as fake electors?
Well I remember Hillary's supporters rioting in dozens of cities for weeks after the election.
Then you remember it all wrong, again...
Both sides of the elections remember things to promote their version of the facts
Perhaps this will jog your selective memory
Anti-Trump protests, some violent, erupt for 3rd night nationwide
Melanie Eversley, Aamer Madhani, and Rick Jervis
USA TODAY November 11, 2016
For the third night in a row, anti-Donald Trump demonstrators took to the streets in several big cities and on college campuses across the United States,
Officers ordered protesters to disperse after the demonstration turned into what they called a riot, citing "extensive criminal and dangerous behavior." At least 26 people were arrested.
Anti-Trump groups called for demonstrations Friday evening in Miami and West Palm Beach .
Demonstrations also took place Thursday night in Columbus, Ohio, and Minneapolis, Minn. Protests in Madison, Wisconsin's capital, and Milwaukee, the state's most populous city, drew some of the biggest crowds, with more than 1,000 demonstrators taking to streets in both cities.
In New York, hundreds of protesters gathered near the iconic Trump Tower for the second straight night to express their anger over the election of the businessman.
In San Francisco, high-spirited high school students marched, chanting “not my president”
In Philadelphia, protesters near City Hall held signs bearing slogans like “Not Our President,” “Trans Against Trump” and “Make America Safe For All.”
Anti-Trump protests, some violent, erupt for 3rd night nationwide (usatoday.com)
........
This is only one article - there were many riots (protests if you listen to the left) proclaiming that Trump was not the duly elected president, etc etc
Oh please, the right are known for their violence and anything you offer up regarding the left - there is absolutely no comparison. I think the majority of violence pinned on the left was by right wing plants in the first place. All you have is something from 2016 and whatever else you may have found pales in comparison. The democrats/leftists/progressives are known for their peaceful protests and you cannot say the same about the right, not possible.
How quickly those who forget the actions from their side... Perhaps this will jog your memory. And this is from ABC News, hardly a "right wing' vendor.
TRUTH!
That's not true.
The former 'president' is a traitor many times over yet the cult of the defenders of the indefensible persist.
Why do you re-post all these hateful lies and hate and ignorance and delusion from the former 'president'?
Doesn't make it true.
The moron continues to defame Ms. Carroll. She should sue him again.
Here is a very small portion of things that were known about Donald trump prior to election day 2016.
Please explain to us why you think he was fit to be president at that time.
1985-1994
Reported $1.17 billion in business losses over the decade. Trump “appears to have lost more money than nearly any other individual American taxpayer,” according to the New York Times .
May 1, 1989
Took out $85,000-worth of full-page ads in New York newspapers calling for the death penalty for the Central Park Five—whose convictions were later vacated after DNA evidence proved their innocence. Trump never apologized.
1990s
Contrary to his story of being a self-made billionaire, Trump received the equivalent today of at least $413 million from his father’s real-estate empire, much of it transferred through suspect tax-dodging schemes.
1991-2009
Declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy for his various businesses six times .
2005
Bragged about grabbing women “by the pussy” in a conversation with Access Hollywood ’s Billy Bush picked up on a hot mic .
2011-2016
Promoted birtherism against President Barack Obama—the false claim that Obama was not born in the United States, that his birth certificate was fraudulent, and that therefore he was constitutionally ineligible for the presidency.
2015-2016
Attacked in sexist and demeaning ways women who raised critical questions about his character. See: Megyn Kelly , Carly Fiorina , Hillary Clinton .
2015-present
Denies accusations of sexual misconduct, ranging from unwanted kissing to rape , by calling the women “liars” and not “his type.”
June 16, 2015
Announced his presidential campaign by describing America as “ a dumping ground for everybody else’s problems .” Mexicans coming to America, he said, were “bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists.”
July 18, 2015
Said Vietnam POW John McCain is “ not a war hero ” and “I like people who weren’t captured.”
November 22, 2015
Claimed that “thousands and thousands” of people in New Jersey’s Arab communities cheered on 9/11.
2016 campaign season
Encouraged violence. Said that he’d like to punch a protester “ in the face ”; that his supporters should “ knock the hell ” out of protesters—“I promise you, I’ll pay the legal bills”; and that the police should not protect suspects’ heads when loading them into squad cars .
May 11, 2016
Refused to release his tax returns for public inspection after having previously promised to do so . On other occasions, he falsely claimed he could not release them because he was under audit. When, in 2019, Congress subpoenaed Trump’s tax returns, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin refused to comply —kicking off cases that went to the Supreme Court.
May-June 2016
Said Judge Gonzalo Curiel is unfit to rule on a lawsuit filed by Trump University students because “ he’s a Mexican ” (in fact, the judge is an American citizen born in Indiana). Trump would later settle the lawsuit for $25 million .
July 27, 2016
Called on Russia to hack and release Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s emails.
July 30, 2016
Denigrated the family of U.S. Army Capt. Humayun Khan, who was killed in 2004 while serving in Iraq, after Khan’s father delivered remarks at the Democratic National Convention.
July 30, 2016
Broke with U.S. policy of supporting Ukraine over Russia’s invasion of Crimea, saying : “The people of Crimea, from what I’ve heard, would rather be with Russia than where they were.”
Fall 2016
Before Election Day, repeatedly hyped unfounded fears of a “rigged” election . Then, after Election Day, he stated , without any evidence, “I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally.”
I would add Trump University scandal, the fact that he was sued hundreds of times for non payment to vendors, the fact that his real estate company was unethicall misrepresenting condo sales in buildings he "owned", and over 100 other reasons.
176 Reasons Donald Trump Shouldn't Be President | GQ
People protested Trumps election because they love their country and knew what a disaster it would be to make this man president.
That is a deflection from the point of politicians breaking laws.
A large majority of people who use demonstrations to cause property damage or loot businesses get caught and prosecuted, just like the over 1,200 people who rioted at the Capital Bldg on Jan 6th.
Do you seriously believe there was no cause to protest Trumps election in 2016 ?
Yes.....................
fuck trumpism
Thank you EG - any criminals during those protests I hope were caught and prosecuted - that's what I always say about protests - any criminal acts should be held accountable, not the protesters.
I do not think this is Trumpism, per se. What we are observing is just how extreme party loyalty is for some people. No matter how bad the nominee is, the party loyalists will vote for him. So in the case of Trump, GOP loyalists are actually voting for a vindictive, loose-cannon, narcissistic traitor who is the only PotUS in our history who has attempted to steal a US presidential election with coercion, fraud, lying, and incitement.
( And of course, the 'rebuttal' will (pathetically) try to equate Biden as being as bad as Trump. )
Biden is much worse for the country than Trump, and everyone with half a brain knows it
No that happens to be YOU. The country has all but been destroyed and you are laser focused on "getting Trump."
Meanwhile, I fully expect Trump supporters to deny the trial, call it rigged, call it political, etc.
I expect a lot of independents who don't like Trump to end up voting for him, precisely because of this exercise in lawfare.
Pure partisan nonsense by those who claim support for the rule of law.
Only partisans and radicals would weaponize and debase the law. Thirty years ago, you would never have gotten away with it.
That sounds like the cry of surrender. Sorry, I'm not taking any prisoners.
Bob, you've done it again! Logic only makes them crazier.
They'll be telling you that the people's choice deserved it all, even death.
Let us watch.
I am laser focused on preventing a vindictive, loose-cannon, narcissistic traitor from gaining the powers of the presidency.
Is it possible to be more melodramatic here??
Are you attempting to accuse me of wanting the law weaponized and debased? Better hold down your rhetoric, Vic. It is one thing for you to believe such hyperbolic nonsense, but it is very different for you to accuse others of wanting what you have imagined.
I can't wait to see the replican word of the month for May.
Try "patronage politics."
AKA buying votes with debt forgiveness.
Notice that the seeded article lists the key donors. Left wing media hasn't been so open about the Biden donors.
Forbes has provided some transparency:
The 230 Biden backers include the founders of companies like Patagonia, DoorDash and Netflix, Democratic megadonors like George Soros and Henry Laufer , as well as billionaire members of some of the country’s richest families like the Waltons, the Pritzkers and the Lauders. Broadly, they tended to hail from the coasts. More than one third live in California. Another 27% are based in New York. It makes sense, then, that about a quarter of them got rich in tech and a third made their fortunes in finance. On average, the billionaires gave about $170,000 to the Biden campaign and its joint-fundraising committees, which split their receipts with the Democratic Party.
Some donors did more than just write checks. After losing to Biden in the primary, Tom Steyer hosted fundraisers for his former foe. Nicole Systrom, who is married to Instagram founder Kevin Systrom , joined Steyer for at least one event. Before the pandemic, these sorts of events could be held at a donor’s home. Or, in the case of billionaire real estate broker George Marcus , who hosted Biden in 2019, at a restaurant he owned in California. Eventually, the Democratic front-runner shifted his events to video calls, where he or Kamala Harris would hop on the line to make a speech and take questions. Other billionaire hosts included former Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker and Blackstone executive Hamilton James .
Some of Biden’s donors also became so-called bundlers by rallying others to open their wallets. At least ten billionaires helped raise an additional $100,000, according to a list released by the campaign. Hedge funder Stephen Mandel , venture capitalist John Doerr and Chicago real estate magnate Neil Bluhm all helped gather money from associates.
At least 60 Biden donors also contributed to some of the major pro-Biden super-PACs. Those groups can’t coordinate with campaigns directly, but they can accept and spend unlimited sums. Facebook cofounder Dustin Moskovitz gave $47 million to one super-PAC. LinkedIn cofounder Reid Hoffman poured more than $7 million into other pro-Biden super-PACs and into ads opposing Trump. Mike Bloomberg never donated directly to Biden’s campaign, but he threw $100 million into super-PACs supporting the Democratic nominee.
Here Are The Billionaires Who Donated To Joe Biden’s 2020 Presidential Campaign (forbes.com)
So?
Does it surprise you that there are billionaires who contribute to D candidates as well as those who contribute to R candidates?
I don't think those R billionaires have any name recognition on maga media...
it also seems like the widow adelson is holding back this year.
It surprises me that big business is now with the democrat party.
Big business is with both parties Vic. They always have been and likely always will be.
Money buys influence and both parties have plenty of business in the USA seeking influence.
Who do you think donated that fifty million dollars to Trump the other night? It sure as hell was not "Small Businesses"!
did Vic edit his post, ? i don't see where his quote originated from
I must have had that in my clipboard. I was intending to quote the prior comment.
Fixed it.
What could you say to Vic basically asking, "Why oh why Lord are those mean old terrible awful no good low down Democrats so mean to poor innocent well meaning Honest Don Trump"?
Why would big business back a political party that is influenced by Marxists & Socialists?
Read post 3.2.21
I am not impressed by words made up to defend a criminal!
A guilty criminal!
But, I do hear you...
Trump has openly admitted to taking Top Secret Documents to Mar Largo, with fourteen different explanations as to why, and all the while, there is not a reason, unless using Trumps' flawed logic of him magically just thinking of declassifying documents makes them so, and even that defensive thought , like a witch, won't float. His former fixer lawyer went to prison for the crime he will be charged with in a week, but, i'll believe it when i see it. ( Trump and cump, actually allowing one
of his vast many, to move forward, while he, attempts to slow down or evade, you know, the facts that he had to pay $130,000.00 to get laid, )
meh, that should turn over a few neighborhoods and free up some nursing home space...
Because come November, it won't be the Republican Party of Donald Trump in power.
First you need to define what you mean by 'Marxist' and 'Socialist' so that I know what you are asking.
One can only hope.
One can also work towards that eventuality.
They do that if you are rich
And then got some $62K profit from the whole thing all said and done.
Trump must be an expensive fuck.
said every woman that accepts a Penny, except girls without any, self respect, morals, or values
their assets weigh high, while deflating for a tax guy, but would never ever LIE
He was for Ms. Daniels.
He told her that he reminded him of Ivanka - probably Ms. Caroll resembled her also which is probably why he sexually assaulted her. Most of the women he sexually assaults probably resemble Ivanka.
He sure has to pay a lot to get laid.
Nothing like a lunch time completely made up conspiracy theory
He reminded himself of Ivanka? That's weird.