╌>

The left's "Maryland Man" hoax torn to shreds

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  vic-eldred  •  last year  •  123 comments

The left's "Maryland Man" hoax torn to shreds
The Department of Justice on Wednesday released new documents on Kilmar Abrego Garcia related to an alleged domestic violence incidents with his wife. No charges were filed. His wife also responded to the document release, saying she stands by her husband and wants to see him returned home.

The leftwing media has been calling him a "Maryland man" or a Maryland dad."  Yesterday facts about the man were finally released. It appears that the radical left may have walked into a trap.

Homeland Security says that he is a verified member of MS-13 and he has been accused of beating his wife. You see, Kilmar Abrego Garcia is an illegal alien who happens to be an El Salvadoran citizen. Senator Chris Van Hollen still doesn't seem to get that. He flew down to El Salvador yesterday to pull a political stunt that backfired when El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele told him that Garcia was a criminal who would remain in an El Salvadoran prison. Sen Van Hollen would not be allowed to speak to him, nor did President Bukele have time for Sen Van Hollen.

Later the same day the DOJ released evidence of Garcia's gang involvement:

GosLhRtWsAA-Ygl?format=jpg&name=small

Later came this from the state of Maryland:

GouUHk6WoAAP67Y?format=jpg&name=large

Thus, another hoax has been demolished. The cherry on top was when the WH Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt had the mother of Rachel Moren speak to the dishonest media and more importantly to the American people:





In other news:


Trump waved off an Israeli plan to strike Iranian nuclear sites, preferring to give Iran one last chance to end its nuclear program peacefully. The two sides plan a second round of discussions on Saturday.

The administration is scrutinizing real estate transactions by New York’s attorney general, Letitia James and it appears that there are serious criminal violations.

The government directed immigration judges to act swiftly to deny asylum to migrants whose applications they consider unlikely to succeed.

The man charged with setting fire to Gov. Josh Shapiro’s Pennsylvania mansion told the police he was responding to Shapiro's pro-Israel stance.

Trump named Jay Clayton as the interim U.S. attorney for Manhattan. Chuck Schumer vowed to block a permanent appointment for Clayton.

China faces an economic double whammy: rapid deflation and a trade war with the US.







Article is LOCKED by moderator [Perrie Halpern R.A.]
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    last year

[ ✘ ] welcome to the news.

Today's big story involves the illegal migrant whom the Associated Press insists is a "Maryland man."

This guy:

GokgTe3XcAAp0MW?format=jpg&name=small

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2  author  Vic Eldred    last year

The dishonest media's coverage thus far:

GosPLKUWIAAzonf?format=jpg&name=small

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    last year

The Garcia case is not only about Garcia the individual; it is about fundamental rule of law issues.   It deals with the right of due process ... something that should be critically important to all who live here.   It also deals with constitutional limits on the Executive branch and the efficacy of checks & balances.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3  author  Vic Eldred    last year

Good morning. Is this better Vic?

GoqzkvMXkAAc-Tj?format=jpg&name=small

Much better. From now on, that is how you come to work.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
3.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    last year

Yes, dress like you’re about to be laid in a casket - to symbolize what you’ve done to your brand.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1    last year

Is that some kind of a threat?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1    last year
dress like you’re about to be laid in a casket

.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
3.1.3  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.1    last year

You can only wish...

I wouldn't mind getting laid in a casket...jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
3.1.4  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Thomas @3.1.3    last year

I wouldnt recommend it , not much room .

and thats all i will say about that .

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
4  Right Down the Center    last year

The left sure does pick strange heros

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Right Down the Center @4    last year

And they think they are going to win the midterms.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1    last year

He is preparing to return .... embarrassed & empty handed.

GosTmrQW0AAeABz?format=jpg&name=small

Question: Are taxpayers on the hook for these flights?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.1.2  bugsy  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.1    last year

Maybe a leftist will set up a gofundme account  s/ so we the taxpayers are not on the hook to pay for this failure, in which we knew was going to happen before it happened. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  bugsy @4.1.2    last year

They got half a million already for the kid who stabbed another young man through the heart at a football game.

It seems you need to be from a certain group.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
4.1.4  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.1    last year

He sure as shit isn’t paying for them out of his own pocket 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.5  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sparty On @4.1.4    last year

Hopefully after this little stunt the people in his district won't elect him again and we won't have to pay for anymore trips to friendly central American countries.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
4.1.6  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.5    last year

Don’t hold your breath.    Lots of liberal dimbulbs in his district I’m sure.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Right Down the Center @4    last year

"The left sure does pick strange heros"

And they seem to be on the wrong side of every 80/20 issue.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
4.2.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Greg Jones @4.2    last year
And they seem to be on the wrong side of every 80/20 issue.

Statistically speaking you would think it is almost impossible for them to be wrong all the time on these issues.  But here we are.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
4.3  MrFrost  replied to  Right Down the Center @4    last year

The left sure does pick strange heros

800

Yep... LOL 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5  JohnRussell    last year

Trump sent someone to prison in another country who has not been convicted or even charged with a crime.  That is the issue. 

The fact that far right wingers like the author of this article dont understand that should enrage everyone. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @5    last year
That is the issue. 

The issue is that 20 million people cannot all get due process even if we tried to give it to them.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.1    last year

If you send people to prison without due process you are a tyrant.   Get that through your thick skull.  And dont say Trump doesnt know these people are being directly sent to a prison in El Salvador. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.1    last year
If you send people to prison without due process you are a tyrant. 

If you deliberately overwhelm the system to keep 20 million illegals in the country, you are a TRAITOR. "You" referring to BIDEN.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.1.2    last year

You have no reasonable argument to make as to why people who have not been charged with a crime are being deliberately sent to a dungeon in El Salvador. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.1.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.3    last year

The reasonable argument you were given:

Is everyone entitled to due process?   Answer YES

If 20 million illegal migrants all demand due process, can they get it?  Answer NO


That had to have been figured in when the radicals who called the shots around Biden opened the southern border.

Therefore, the President is taking emergency measures to keep Americans safe.

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
5.1.5  George  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.1    last year
If you send people to prison without due process you are a tyrant.

It's much better to just murder them by drone strike. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5.1.6  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.1    last year
"If you send people to prison without due process you are a tyrant."

Did all those innocent bystanders on J6 get due process? Looks like the Biden administration were a bunch of tyrants

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.1.7  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.1    last year

Biden let them all in without any vetting or processing, Trump should be able to get them out the same way. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.1.8  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.3    last year
harged with a crime

Coming to this country illegally is a crime. The Trump administration should show them the same door going out as they came in. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.1.9  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.1    last year

These illegals decided to forego due process when they entered the country.  And the Democrats and the left supported it.  

Now, using that same logic, they can forego due process on their way out.  And the Democrats and the left can STFU.  This is what they supported.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
5.1.10  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @5.1.6    last year
Did all those innocent bystanders on J6 get due process?

Um, yes. Next?

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
5.1.11  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.1    last year

Well, you had better start working on it, because the Constitution requires due process.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
5.1.12  Split Personality  replied to  Greg Jones @5.1.6    last year
Did all those innocent bystanders on J6 get due process?

Yes, probably hundreds of hours more than they deserved.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
5.2  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @5    last year
Trump sent someone to prison in another country

Wow, Trump is powerful.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @5    last year
Trump sent someone to prison in another country who has not been convicted or even charged with a crime.

He sent someone home and his HOME put him in prison. 

The fact that far right wingers like the author of this article dont understand that should enrage everyone.

Sorry, not everybody falls for the left wing hoaxes any more.  But, please, keep spewing them.  It's pretty fun to see what the next "Freak out of the Day" will be.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5.4  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @5    last year

Removed 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
5.4.1  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @5.4    last year

The republican war on people with brown skin continues. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
5.5  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @5    last year
dont understand that should enrage everyone. 

That card has been played too often only to find out the things the left feel everyone should be enraged over is just made up outrage.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6  author  Vic Eldred    last year

One last message for Sen Chris Van Hollenn:    Don't come back ... I'm busy.

GorqUmkaUAA8DPr?format=jpg&name=small

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
6.1  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @6    last year

Nice to see your standing with the Dictators. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
6.1.1  Sparty On  replied to  Thomas @6.1    last year

How is his standing with them?    Do you know?

Good?   Bad?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
6.1.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  Thomas @6.1    last year

Because he is not sending one of his own citizen criminals back to  the US?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
7  Jeremy Retired in NC    last year
she stands by her husband and wants to see him returned home.

She got what she wanted. He was returned home.

Senator Chris Van Hollen still doesn't seem to get that. He flew down to El Salvador yesterday to pull a political stunt that backfired[✘]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7    last year
She got what she wanted.  He was returned home.

LMAO!  I love it!

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
7.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7    last year

It turns out he was a wife beater and abuser also. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
7.2.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Greg Jones @7.2    last year

Who?  Hegseth?  Yeah, we know.  Why are you bringing Hegseth up?  Hasn’t he been rewarded enough for beating his wife?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
7.2.2  Sparty On  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @7.2.1    last year

Stop repeating lies and hearsay about Hegseth.    Directly from his ex wife who was “allegedly” abused:

“First and foremost, I have not and will not comment on my marriage to Pete Hegseth. I do not have representatives speaking on my behalf, nor have I ever asked anyone to share or speak about the details of my marriage on my behalf, whether it be a reporter, a committee member, a transition team member, etc.”

She added, “I do not believe your information to be accurate, and I have CC’d my lawyer.”

“There was no physical abuse in my marriage. This is the only further statement I will make to you, I have let you know that I am not speaking and will not speak on my marriage to Pete. Please respect this decision,” she concluded.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.2.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @7.2.2    last year
“There was no physical abuse in my marriage. This is the only further statement I will make to you, I have let you know that I am not speaking and will not speak on my marriage to Pete.

sounds a little shaky

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
7.2.4  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.3    last year

No more so than a former sister in-law with God knows what mental malfunction …

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
7.2.5  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Greg Jones @7.2    last year

And the left was dead silent about those facts.  Wonder why.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
7.2.6  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Sparty On @7.2.2    last year

Pete’s mommy says otherwise, admittedly and on record.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
7.2.7  Sparty On  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @7.2.6    last year

Hold on to that.    The woman it allegedly happened to denies it ever happened.

You are once again …. grasping at straws.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
7.2.8  bugsy  replied to  Sparty On @7.2.7    last year

2-1643622622.png

Yep....pretty much sums it up.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
7.2.9  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Sparty On @7.2.7    last year

That’s why he beats them - to keep their mouths shut.  He’s an alcoholic wife beater than runs corporations into the ground and chats about active war plans on commercial chat apps without even looking to see who he is chatting with.  Perfect candidate for Trump’s cabinet.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
7.2.10  Right Down the Center  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @7.2.6    last year

Funny how you keep wanting to divert to Pete.  Show you have nothing on topic to add.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
7.2.11  Right Down the Center  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @7.2.9    last year

See 7.2.8

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
7.2.13  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @7.2    last year

It turns out he was a wife beater and abuser also. 

So is trump and you seem to be fine with it. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
7.2.14  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Right Down the Center @7.2.10    last year

Funny how you guys try to apply hypocrisy in every situation regardless of applicability, but when you get called out for displaying your own flagrantly blatant hypocrisy you deflect deflect deflect.  Must be part of your coding.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
7.2.15  Right Down the Center  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @7.2.14    last year

You are deflecting again.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8  author  Vic Eldred    last year

JUST IN: Rep. Elise Stefanik considers run for governor of New York.

Goq8UDTW8AAEnLh?format=jpg&name=small

Rep. Elise Stefanik is considering a run for New York governor

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
8.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    last year
JUST IN: Rep. Elise Stefanik considers run for governor of New York.

That would be good news for all New Yorkers so I am sure she will lose.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
8.2  MrFrost  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    last year

What's her platform? "I lie constantly and I hate brown people"? Should go great. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
8.2.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  MrFrost @8.2    last year

Actually many of those same folks you mentioned flocked to Trump rather than vote for Kamel breath.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
8.2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  MrFrost @8.2    last year
"I lie constantly and I hate brown people"?

I don't think she's running on the Biden platform.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
9  author  Vic Eldred    last year

GosDrelW8AAYFCb?format=jpg&name=small

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
9.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @9    last year

Illegal immigrants have been coming to America as long as any of us have been alive.  The notorious gangster now in prison in El Salvador entered the US during Trump's first term. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
9.1.1  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @9.1    last year

So what?  

Illegal is illegal.    

What part of that is so hard to understand?

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
9.1.2  charger 383  replied to  JohnRussell @9.1    last year

and in Trump's second term he out of the USA and some other country is spending money to freed him.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
9.1.3  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @9.1    last year

The biggest question is why you support a member of a terrorist organization who is also ia wife beater

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.1.4  Right Down the Center  replied to  Greg Jones @9.1.3    last year
The biggest question is why you support a member of a terrorist organization who is also ia wife beater

The fact that Trump might be right about something is too much for some to bear.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
9.1.5  Sparty On  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.1.4    last year

Oh yeah, the cheese teeters precariously on many of their crackers but that would knock it off completely.    Never to return.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
9.2  MrFrost  replied to  Vic Eldred @9    last year

The trump admin admitted they fucked up, but they are too fucking retarded to fix it... Wow... LOL 

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
9.2.1  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  MrFrost @9.2    last year

I have been sort of watching this situation . if what i have read is true , this gentleman is a Salvadorian citizen ,  His rendition back to El Salvador , pretty much puts him outside the US judicial system and jurisdiction , unless he gets extradited back . I dont see that country sending him back.

he rightly falls under the jurisdiction of his home country , for them to judicially do as they see fit within their laws just by being there and the US judicial system or government has no say in the matter .

 For some reason , this comes to mind, someone stepped over a dollar to pick up a dime .

 bear with me here , someone in stead of prosecuting and likely getting a conviction , opted for the quick deportation , forgoing a trial . they went for the easy get, once gone is also outside US jurisdiction  , so yeah a fuck up that worked in this guys favor if one looks at it from a certain point of view .

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9.2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @9.2.1    last year
the US judicial system or government has no say in the matter .

That is something the left can't seem to wrap their heads around.  The Democrats were even dumb enough to have a member go to El Salvador to pathetically beg to see the prisoner.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
9.2.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  MrFrost @9.2    last year

The mistake was not the deportation it was deportation into that prison.  It is up to the President of El Salvador. It is after all one of his citizens.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
9.2.4  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.2.3    last year

The mistake was his and his alone.    

Entering the USA illegally.

He started all this by doing so.    It’s all on him.    

100%

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
9.2.5  goose is back  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.2.3    last year
deportation into that prison

You are correct, he should be released then deported to Somalia.....done.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
9.2.6  Thomas  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @9.2.1    last year

I don't think that he has done anything in El Salvador, either, so they have no reason to hold him. That never stopped a dictator, and Trump is just learning.  

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
9.2.7  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Thomas @9.2.6    last year

I tend to agree he likely hasnt done anything in his nation of origin , but there are too many unknowns really .

 i say that because look what happened to another famous "deportee". remember the bald headed Venezuelan kid who was on social media hyping "squatting and collecting benefits ?  last i read he was sent back , and the government there had a "discussion " about how he presented his countrymen in a "bad " light to the world , and  the government was charging him last i read a month or so ago. 

 we plebs cant know all the laws everywhere in the world and how they are enforced . 

 The whole world does not operate on just US laws and our small perceptions of how things should work .

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.2.8  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.2.3    last year

One mistake was deportation to El Salvador.   That expressly violated his withholding of removal granted in 2019.

A larger mistake was denying due process to all those deported.   That violates the CotUS.

Trump does not care about the constitution (or the rule of law).   Do his (remaining) supporters care?

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
9.2.9  Thomas  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @9.2.7    last year

Due process: It is not optional.

He had been living in this country, not another. Every person in the country has rights so the government cannot just yank them off the streets and make them disappear. That is the whole point. The rule of law, the Constitution, and due process.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
9.2.10  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Thomas @9.2.9    last year

different people will have different views and opinions . and this is no different , mine just differ from yours in this matter .

The constitution doesnt say much about this specific situation , but the laws which were made under it do ., which in my opinion this gentleman thumbed his nose at the moment he illegally crossed the border , the rule of law does matter after all.

he had 13 years of due process with the courts if what i have been reading is true , in front of a judge who determined he was deportable eventually. the system worked , just not in his favor , or in the favor of how some think it should work .  If that is the case its time the legislature change the laws the judiciary operate under , if they can .

 due process and rule of law is not optional , even if the defendant broke the rule of law and tries to subvert the process.

 asking forgiveness is not a remedy for failure to ask permission . so that is not the better option .

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
9.2.11  Thomas  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @9.2.10    last year

Up until he was taken from his family, the last due process said do not deport to El Salvador. He had no due process after that. 

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
9.2.12  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Thomas @9.2.11    last year

The way i see it , and this is simply my opinion , and we know what they say about opinions .

 this guy has some choices to make .

he can try and come back to the US , likely face prosecution, human trafficking being the one im thinking of , and take a chance he wont be convicted . if convicted suffer the consequences . Epstein's girlfriend comes to mind with all the publicity this has garnered  with what could happen to trafficker's. 

 OR

 he can stay where he is , outside US jurisdiction , and make the US extradite him, which his home country likely wont allow because of the terrorist group thing the US is currently following , even with threats from rival gangs in his home country ,he has to figure out where he is better off.

 being he is no longer being held in CECOT, and from what i have read in passing , he is more or less on an administrative hold in his home country that actually has jurisdiction over him . Now if he faces charges there for something is not really known , that country is under no obligation to say , there is no freedom of information act there or its equivalent at play that i can find , or have looked for .

 have to wait and see what they , and ultimately he decides which is best for him given the situation . and the US government or political parties no longer really factor in those choices anymore , not once he left US jurisdiction .

 which IMHO, might be better for him in the long run .

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
10  Thomas    last year

Due process: It is not optional.

I do not believe the government.

Why?

For the most part their complete failure to produce these documents when first requested.

The government is unfortunately not a trustworthy source of information at this juncture, as evidenced by all of the conflicting information coming out of the administration. 

But hey, they'll have a "known" cause of autism by September.... jrSmiley_123_smiley_image.gif  

But hey, if everything works out in Trump world, we might not even be a functional democracy by then. So, Everyone! Enjoy your fucking breakfast.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
11  author  Vic Eldred    last year

Final Thoughts:

Yousuf-Karsh-Edward-R.-Murrow-1959-778x980.jpg

MSNBC has been covering the Garcia story on a daily basis right up until a day ago when we began finding out about this illegal migrant from El Salvador. At that point the story has altered from one of a family man being wrongly deported to an issue of due process.

The fact is that Garcia got his due process in 2019 before two immigration judges, both of whom determined that Garcia was indeed an MS-13 gang member. They were concerned about his safety in El Salvador and recommended that he be deported elsewhere.  He had his hearing which he lost, and he had his appeal which he also lost. The Trump administration may have made a mistake in deporting him to El Salvador and they may have to go the extra mile in deporting to some other country. I do want everyone to note that Garcia recently met with Senator Chris Van Hollen. In the pictures Garcia seemed to be healthy, though still overweight, yet very much untouched by MS-13.

Let us not forget that he was caught in Tennessee transporting over a dozen people who gave his address as their address. For those who demand he be convicted, that is trafficking. He also beat his wife and who knows what else. He is an illegal alien and a threat to every decent human being. 


"Good night and good luck."

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
11.1  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @11    last year
The fact is that Garcia got his due process in 2019 before two immigration judges ...

No, that is ridiculous.   Appearing before an immigration judge in 2019 does not satisfy all future acts by the government.  His 2025 deportation was a distinct event and requires due process.

Further, his 2019 withholding of removal expressly prohibited him being deported to El Salvador.   So if he had been provided due process, he would NOT have been deported to El Salvador.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
11.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @11.1    last year

I understand. I think Trump may eventually have to bring him back and give him a day in court. I'm certain he will then be ordered deported again, possibly to somewhere that will take him. That will give Trump's enemies a brief cause for celebration.

The much more important question with due process involves the 12 million illegal migrants allowed into the county in the past 4 years combined with the 12-15 million that were already here. They will all now demand due process. There is no way on earth that they can have their cases heard in a timely manner. It would take a century to give them all a hearing and deport those that lose their case. I'm sure that is why Trump used the Alien Enemies Act.

Right now, I'm really focused on May 15 when the SCOTUS hears the oral arguments on the federal government’s request to be allowed to implement President Donald Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship. That is something that needs to be straightened out, but it is not really what they are expected to get into. They are actually going to focus in on the limits to the authority of district judges. That day cannot come fast enough.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
11.1.2  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @11.1.1    last year
I think Trump may eventually have to bring him back and give him a day in court. I'm certain he will then be ordered deported again, possibly to somewhere that will take him.

Trump is doubling down and even lying about Garcia's history?   Are you okay with such pointless acts and the insane level of lying Trump and his cabinet are producing in this matter? 

The much more important question with due process involves the 12 million illegal migrants allowed into the county in the past 4 years combined with the 12-15 million that were already here.

Stop buying whatever bullshit Trump is selling.   Our nation has averaged  between 10 and 12 million illegals within our borders since the Bush days.   We do NOT have in excess of 24 million illegals.

SR_24.07.22_unauthorizedimmigrants_1.png?w=640

Right now, I'm really focused on May 15 when the SCOTUS hears the oral arguments on the federal government’s request to be allowed to implement President Donald Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship.

Birthright citizenship is a constitutional right.   An EO cannot end it.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
11.1.3  bugsy  replied to  Vic Eldred @11.1.1    last year
Right now, I'm really focused on May 15 when the SCOTUS hears the oral arguments on the federal government’s request to be allowed to implement President Donald Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship. That is something that needs to be straightened out, but it is not really what they are expected to get into. They are actually going to focus in on the limits to the authority of district judges. That day cannot come fast enough.

This will affect so many other decisions by these federal judges than just the birthright issue.

If they say that the fed judges have no jurisdiction making this decision, then, in essence, they are saying no fed judge has the ability to make decisions that affect the entire country.

I truly hope this is what they say.....loud and clear.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
11.1.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  bugsy @11.1.3    last year
I truly hope this is what they say.....loud and clear.

I'm counting on it.

I think the question of whether the 14th Amendment was speaking to those born to the newly freed slaves rather than foreign nationals who have children born here will be left to another day.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
12  Thomas    last year
Rachel Morin's mother describes daughter's murder at White House press briefing

Your conflation is noted. 

Let me also note that where they keep records of such, undocumented persons are less likely to commit murder than are American citizens.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
12.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Thomas @12    last year
Let me also note that where they keep records of such, undocumented persons are less likely to commit murder than are American citizens.

Actually, that is not true. We have many unsolved crimes, not that it matters.

Every crime committed by someone who shouldn't be here is a crime that was preventable.

 
 
 
freepress
Freshman Silent
13  freepress    last year

Pete Hegseth has questionable tattoos, settled a rape charge, drunk and disorderly, yet look where he is now. Trump convicted of felonies, defamation, credibly accused of rape settling out of court over the years requiring NDA's so the women kept quiet, yet look where he is. Linda McMahon and her husband accused of sexual abuse and settled with victims financially, look where she is. 

January 6th rioters beating cops were pardoned, the fines handed down for the destruction of the Capitol building and grounds are about to be refunded! That's right, handing money back to domestic terrorists who stormed the capitol defecating and urinating in the building, smashed windows, doors, stole property from the Capitol building and Trump treats them like saints.

If criminal records don't apply to the J6 rioters who literally attacked America and the American Capitol then what laws?

If laws only apply to people Trump hates and laws don't apply to people Trump likes, then laws are no longer valuable. We are now subject to the whims of a king.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
13.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  freepress @13    last year
Pete Hegseth has questionable tattoos

Pete Hegseth doesn't have a confidential informant fingering him as a MS-13 associate.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
13.1.1  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @13.1    last year

Tha's all you got? If Garcia had a finding of being in MS-13, one would expect to find it amongst the legal documentation surrounding his 2019 case. Since nobody has made mention of such documentation, one must therefore conclude that, at this late juncture in the process that he does not have a finding of belonging to MS-13. 

Further, the reason that he only has the do not deport order is because he filed his asylum claim two days late, the Judge giving him the do not deport in lieu of asylum. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
13.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Thomas @13.1.1    last year
Tha's all you got?

That is really all I need. If he is brought back, he will be deported again, maybe not to El Salvador, but he will be deported AGAIN.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
13.1.3  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @13.1.2    last year

I agree, although this would be a very unusual exception, the Trump administration can legally deport him to a nation other than El Salvador and they will likely try do it because they have already created a false narrative about him being a gang member.   This administration, because of Trump, does not care about what is right or wrong, or care about the damage to 'little people'.  They are assholes and they will move this pawn to meet their needs.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
13.1.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @13.1.3    last year
because they have already created a false narrative about him being a gang member. 

He was identified as such by a government informer.

"They also cited a tip from a confidential informant who said Abrego Garcia was part of MS-13’s “Westerns” clique, which operates out of New York. "

Trump’s claims about Abrego Garcia’s gang ties largely rely on 1 confidential tip

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
13.1.5  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @13.1.3    last year

The assholes are the people who intentionally keep letting illegals like this back into our country.    Them and the dimbulbs who defend such policy.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
13.1.6  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @13.1.3    last year
have already created a false narrative about him being a gang member

You've created an argument that is impervious to reality.  Might as well claim he cured cancer. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
13.1.7  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @13.1.4    last year
He was identified as such by a government informer.

So what?   The informant, by the way, has been discredited.

Do you think it is proper to take the word of a single discredited person when there is no corroborating evidence and, indeed, the evidence illustrates Garcia is almost certainly NOT a member of MS-13.

Garcia is gainfully employed, married to a US citizen, raising three kids, and has no criminal record.  How, exactly, does he pull that off while being a member of MS-13?    And where is the actual evidence of his membership.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
13.1.8  TᵢG  replied to  Sparty On @13.1.5    last year

Garcia was illegally deported.   He had the legal right to stay and work in the USA.   He could legally be deported to another nation but that would be quite an exception to the norm.

When an immigration judge grants someone a withholding of removal that is a legal ruling.   Because of that ruling, Garcia was not deported back to his home nation and was allowed to stay in the USA and work.   That is the legal reality.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
13.1.9  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @13.1.6    last year

What a pathetic claim.   If you are going to write crap like that then you need to make an argument showing why Garcia is a member of MS-13,

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
13.1.10  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @13.1.8    last year
He had the legal right to stay and work in the USA

He had zero legal right to be in the USA. That's a fact. A valid deportation order was in effect. 

e grants someone a withholding of removal that is a legal ruling. 

A legal ruling that prevented his deportation to El Salvador ONLY.  If the US can find another country to take him, he could have  been deported at any time without any further hearing. He was only allowed to work until the US could find a place to deport him to other than El Salvador. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
13.1.11  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @13.1.9    last year
f you are going to write crap like that then you need to make an argument showing why Garcia is a member of MS-13,

Lol  The "pathetic" claim that was enough for an immigration judge and an appellate court to rule that he did not qualify for bail because of his gang ties.  The legal system believes he's a member, the father of his wife's children said he's a member, he worked for a convicted human trafficker and in the face of all these uncontested facts you just say "nun-unh."  That's pathetic. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
13.1.12  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @13.1.8    last year

Don’t care.    The guy was here illegally for over a decade.    Trump just made the inevitable finally happen.    I’ll let my friends on the left shed a tear over this “miscarriage of justice” while they key Tesla’s, damage public property and expect to get away scot free.

The hypocrisy of these folks is endless

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
13.1.13  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @13.1.10    last year
He had zero legal right to be in the USA.

As I just finished writing, he could be deported elsewhere but he had the right to stay and work in the USA and work.

You seem to not read my comments and also ignore important facts.  Your comment repeats essentially what I just wrote.   The difference is that you fail to recognize that Garcia reported annually to ICE and that his withholding of removal grants him the right to live and work legally in the U.S. indefinitely (albeit he could, with an exception, be deported to another nation).    Further, Homeland Security issued Garcia a work permit.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
13.1.14  TᵢG  replied to  Sparty On @13.1.12    last year
Don’t care.  

Yeah, you do not care that an immigration judge gave him the right to live and work in the USA (albeit he still could be deported).   It harms your chosen narrative so you ... "don't care".

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
13.1.15  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @13.1.11    last year

So you do not understand that denying bail need only be based on a possibility of gang membership and that is nowhere close to a ruling that he is a gang member?

Further, you continue to ignore the fact that there is no evidence tying him to MS-13 and plenty that shows he is not a member.

But it is clearly important for you to make him a member.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
13.1.16  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @13.1.15    last year
derstand that denying bail need only be based on a possibility of gang membership and that is nowhere close to a ruling that he is a gang member?

This is Orwellian. It's simply impossible to claim, at least consistent with the rules of logic and the english language, that a judge using the issue of his gang membership to make a ruling on his eligibility for bail is nowhere close to ruling he's not a member of the gang. It's hallucinatory.  His gang membership was literally the issue that decided whether he got bail. To turn around and try to claim that's nowhere close to ruling he's a gang member is so far beyond disingenuous as to be hallucinatory. It bears no basis to observed reality.

Understand, the judge's job was only to determine his fitness for bail.  It was  not to issue a formal ruling on whether he's a gang member.  The judge's task was  to rule on his fitness for bail and it was his gang membership that made him unfit.  That's as close as that judge could come to issuing a formal ruling on gang membership. 

ontinue to ignore the fact that there is no evidence tying him to MS-13

How you argue that while knowing a judge and an appellate court denied him bond based on the evidence of his membership in MS-13 is beyond comprehension. Your claim is simply impervious to documented reality.  It's basically a conspiracy theory at this point. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
13.1.17  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @13.1.13    last year
emoval grants him the right to live and work legally in the U.S.

He had no legal right to be here, hence the government's ability to deport him at any time without further notice as you now admit. People with the legal right to be here can't be deported without notice.  See the difference? 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
13.1.18  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @13.1.16    last year

Okay Sean, you just keep repeating the same crap over again.   I rebut it, you repeat.   This is pointless.

If you can demonstrate that Garcia is an MS-13 terrorist then do so.  

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
13.1.19  Thomas  replied to  Sean Treacy @13.1.17    last year
He had no legal right to be here

Well then due process him and get it over with. You keep arguing that he had due process when he had absolutely no chance to answer the charges brought against him. The 2019 case was adjudicated in his favor. Any claims after that need to be held to the same standards.

The cop let him go. Nothing to see there. There was no due process on that, either.  Until due process is followed, there is nothing, and that is the whole fucking point.

You keep saying that he had his due process when he quite clearly did not. And you have the nerve to talk about Orwellian.

 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
13.1.20  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @13.1.14    last year

That’s right.    Don’t care.    Biden spent four years making a bad situation worse with his porous Biden border policy.    So yeah, I’m past caring.

“Could be deported?”    What a joke.   People talk “due process” and accept years, decades even in this case, of delays simply because it scratches their TDS itch.    Due process = speedy and public trial?    Guess not in this case.

Pathetic!

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
13.1.21  TᵢG  replied to  Sparty On @13.1.20    last year

If you abide by the CotUS and the way our system of justice works, you would hold true to the fundamental principle of due process.   Due process when it meets your political views and not when it goes against your political views is pathetic.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
13.1.22  Sean Treacy  replied to  Thomas @13.1.19    last year
Well then due process him and get it over with

That's how got the deportation order to begin wirth. 

e 2019 case was adjudicated in his favor. 

Please understand this. In 2019 the courts found he could be deported. The only thing "found in his favor" was that he couldn't be deported to EL Salvador and El Salvador alone because he claimed he would be persecuted by another gang in El Salvador.   That's it.  Look it up. After losing his deportation hearing in 2019, he could be deported anywhere in the world but El Salvador without any further proceedings.

he cop let him go. Nothing to see there.

What are you even talking about?  A deportation order was entered and remains in effect to this day. That's not up for debate.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
13.1.23  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @13.1.18    last year
 I rebut it, you repeat.   This is pointless

What is pointless is you making absolutist, absurd claims like "there's no evidence he was a member of Ms-13" while somehow ignoring all the evidence you've been repeatedly presented with.  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
13.1.24  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @13.1.23    last year

Stop with the obnoxious bullshit and just deliver the evidence that Garcia is/was a member of MS-13.

Testimony from informants (disputed), photo-shopped tattoos, his clothing, myriad suspicions, etc. are weak and circumstantial.   Since you have been harping on this for days now, you either are intentionally writing bullshit obnoxious posts or you truly believe you have evidence to back up your conviction that Garcia is a member of MS-13.

I will assume you are being honest and truly believe Garcia is a member of MS-13.   So deliver the hard evidence that backs up your belief that Garcia is or was a member of MS-13.   Show us all the persuasive evidence and argument that is the foundation of your belief.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
13.1.25  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @13.1.24    last year
timony from informants (disputed), photo-shopped tattoos, his clothing, myriad suspicions, etc. are weak and circumstantial.

Finally, after days of denying the obvious and making absurd claims you finally admit evidence of his gang membership.  Baby steps I guess.

   So deliver the hard evidence that backs up your belief that Garcia is or was a member of MS-13.   Show us all the persuasive evidence and argument that is the foundation of your belief.

I have. I'll use your reasoning from when you believed numerous judges found he wasn't a member of MS-13 before you had to back off that mistaken position as well.  The fact that the only judges who weighed the issue found the evidence compelling enough to deny bail on the basis of gang membership.  You were happy to give those judges deference when you thought they supported your point and then flipped when you found they didn't. so obviously your opinion is based on your desires rather than any logical basis as you abandoned your claimed deference to the immigration judges as soon is worked against you.  

That doesn't even include the statement of the father of his wife's children to the Courts that he's a gang member, that he was pulled over driving 8 migrants while claiming to work for a convicted human trafficker... Put it all together and it is hard to imagine a scenario where he's not in a gang. Too much evidence that when combined, can't be explained away. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
13.1.26  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @13.1.25    last year
Finally, after days of denying the obvious and making absurd claims you finally admit evidence of his gang membership. 

You really are going to stoop to this level?   What you claim I admit are facts that I have stated for days.   How utterly slimy.

I have.

And I have rebutted them.   I am done repeating the same rebuttals to the same feeble arguments from you.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
14  Perrie Halpern R.A.    last year

Not sure why a 5-month-old article was resurrected, so I am locking it.

 
 

Who is online




88 visitors