╌>

The Champions of the democrat party

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  vic-eldred  •  last year  •  134 comments

The Champions of the democrat party
LORENZ: So you're going to see women especially that feel like, oh, my God, right? Like here's this man who -- who's a revolutionary, who's famous, who's handsome, who's young, who's smart, he's a person that seems this like this morally good man which is hard to find.


Last night Fox News analyst & anchor Sean Hannity aired an interview he had with the f ormer "Washington Post" columnist, technology reporter for "The New York Times", "Daily Beast", and "Business Insider", Taylor Lorenz. It involved the statement she made concerning a man on trial for the murder of a United Health Care CEO. Lorenz attributed the comments to Mangione supporters, but it was clear that she supported them even though she half-heartily tried to deny it. She often compared the insurance industry to assassins. Hannity never could get her to condemn the man who murdered the Insurance executive. And we wonder why there is so much violence coming from the left. Here is the interview:

 




GeZ5BRaXMAARiLt?format=jpg&name=small
Luigi Mangione

Luigi Mangione was a spoiled brat, wealthy aristocrat from a wealthy family who never had to work. He decides one day to go out and gun down a self-made guy from the Midwest, who rose to become CEO of United Health Care Insurance. Suddenly Mangione is some kind of folk hero.

Gl7zVxYXoAA8RN_?format=jpg&name=360x360
Mahmoud Khalil

Mahmoud Khalil is a known Hamas supporter, who had his student visa revoked for the activities he helped promote at Columbia University. A federal judge stepped in to temporarily block his deportation. Another folk hero for the left.

GoswN3CaYAAM4O4?format=jpg&name=large
Karmelo Anthony

Karmelo Anthony was the kid who went to a football game packing a knife and sat in the opposing team section causing a commotion. When another boy asked him to leave Karmelo stabbed him in the heart. Later Karmelo supporters raised about half a million dollars for him (thus far) on " go fund me. " Karmelo lived in a very affluent neighborhood. One wonders if the situation were reversed would the other kid, being white have raised money on " go fund me ?"

Gol8ZZJWMAEzJ0d?format=jpg&name=small
Kilmar Abrego Garcia

Kilmar Abrego Garcia had been ordered deported long ago by both a District Court Judge and an Appellate Court Judge, both of whom found evidence that he was an M-13 gang member. Recently Senator Chris Van Hollen went to El Salvador to secure his release. The President of El Salvador told Van Hollen that Garcia was an El Salvadoran citizen and was subject to the laws of El Salvador and in prison he would remain.

We have all heard the arguments made for these individuals. Only yesterday I heard one repeat the nonsense about "what law did he break? "  The people who support them are as bad as they are.


In the news:

Secretary of State Marco Rubio says the US will abandon its effort to end the Ukraine war unless there is meaningful progress in the next several days. “If it is not possible to end the war in Ukraine, we need to move on,” Rubio said as he departed meetings in Paris.

A 20-year-old student killed two people and wounded six others in a shooting at the Florida State University campus in Tallahassee.

The Supreme Court announced that it would hear arguments in a few weeks over the issue of birth-right citizenship and if it was intended for migrants.

The Trump administration has threatened to block Harvard University from enrolling international students unless the school hands over records of student's behavior.

An administration official asked the I.R.S. to look into whether Mike Lindell, pillow entrepreneur and Trump ally, had been wrongfully targeted for an audit. Lindell had supported Fox News during efforts to pressure its sponsors.

The Trump administration said it would take over the renovation of NYC's Penn Station which had come to resemble a filthy outhouse.

A federal judge ruled that Google acted illegally to maintain a monopoly.

 The European Central Bank cut interest rates as it grapples with heightened economic uncertainty over tariffs with the US.

The U.S. is withdrawing hundreds of troops from Syria.

The Texas House of Representatives approved a plan to create a $1 billion taxpayer-funded private school voucher fund.

A federal grand jury indicted Luigi Mangione, who is accused in the killing of a health care executive in Manhattan.







Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    last year

[ ✘ ] welcome to the news.

news-entrance-penn-station-corner-24441263.jpg?w=1024

President Trump has fired the MTA from their long-awaited renovation of Penn Station.

When you want it safe and clean it might be better for the President to do it himself.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    last year

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
1.2  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    last year

When you want it safe and clean it might be better for the President to do it himself.

There might be something to that. I for one can't wait to see him down on all fours, licking the pavement. 

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
1.3  SteevieGee  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    last year

In the news:

Secretary of State Marco Rubio says the US is failing to reach a unilateral agreement to end the war that Trump said was going to be easy. “It is not possible to end the war in Ukraine, we have failed,” Rubio said as he departed meetings in Paris.

A 20-year-old MAGA nazi racist killed two people and wounded six others in a shooting at the Florida State University campus in Tallahassee.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3.1  devangelical  replied to  SteevieGee @1.3    last year

he was probably unhappy that college elitists weren't giving trump's christo-fascist agenda enough time to show results ...

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.3.2  cjcold  replied to  devangelical @1.3.1    7 months ago

Not anything like them but want to be a radical in some way or another. I seriously miss being a radical hippy fighting against the war back in the 60s. 

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.3.3  cjcold  replied to  SteevieGee @1.3    7 months ago

Yet another Florida guy? It's becoming a cliche. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    last year

Karmelo Anthony probably belongs on that list  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    last year

You're right. They raised half a million for him.

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.1.1  goose is back  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    last year
They raised half a million for him.

That was money well spent by his donors.  They bought a $800,000+ house and a new car. Their defense is they are the victims, reminds me of BLM. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.1.2  MrFrost  replied to  goose is back @2.1.1    last year
They bought a $800,000+ house and a new car.

Well, at least they aren't spending 4 million taxpayer dollars a week on golf. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
3  Jeremy Retired in NC    last year
Kilmar Abrego Garcia had been ordered deported long ago by both a District Court Judge and an Appellate Court Judge, both of whom found evidence that he was an M-13 gang member.

Isn't it odd that the the left won't acknowledge that Garcia received the "due process" they are crying about?

Recently Senator Chris Van Hollen went to El Salvador to secure his release. 

And from what I have seen, he did this at the expense of taxpayers.  What was this clown's intent?  Did he actually think that he had any kind of power in a foreign country?  It's pretty pathetic (although expected) that a Democrat would fight harder for an illegal than a US Citizen.  The left needs to wake up.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3    last year

What was this clown's intent?  

 Virtue signaling to his base who cares more about illegal aliens than the Americans he actually represents.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
3.1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1    last year

It was idiotic virtue signaling that allowed this to even happen.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3    last year
Isn't it odd that the the left won't acknowledge that Garcia received the "due process" they are crying about?

We have spent a lot of time on him, haven't we?

And from what I have seen, he did this at the expense of taxpayers.

Another member of congress just asked that Van Hollen pay his own way. Maybe we are getting through to people here.


What was this clown's intent?

I assume he wants to undermine the man he hates.


Did he actually think that he had any kind of power in a foreign country? 

Believe it or not the President of El Salvador eventually allowed him to meet Garcia.

Gox1tZmbAAAALaW?format=jpg&name=large

It's pretty pathetic (although expected) that a Democrat would fight harder for an illegal than a US Citizen. 

Yes, it is and all of America is watching.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
3.2.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2    last year
What was this clown's intent?
I assume he wants to undermine the man he hates.

Typical stupidity of the "Orange Man Bad" people.

Did he actually think that he had any kind of power in a foreign country? 
Believe it or not the President of El Salvador eventually allowed him to meet Garcia.

That I didn't know.  But still, was pretty pathetic (and expected) behavior from the Democrats

It's pretty pathetic (although expected) that a Democrat would fight harder for an illegal than a US Citizen. 
Yes, it is and all of America is watching.

But sadly there are still some who just don't get it.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.2.1    last year
That I didn't know.

It happened not long ago.


But sadly there are still some who just don't get it.

And according to Nate Silver those "some" are likely to nominate AOC in 2028.

Pollster Nate Silver predicts AOC will be next Democratic presidential nominee | Fox News

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
3.2.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.2    last year
And according to Nate Silver those "some" are likely to nominate AOC in 2028.

Well, I don't recall anybody claiming they were smart.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.2.3    last year

There are those looking for moderation. Unfortunately, the radical left seems to have a firm hold on the party.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
3.2.5  Split Personality  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.2    last year
Pollster Nate Silver predicts AOC will be next Democratic presidential nominee | Fox News

If true there would be another GOP Administration after Trump.

But the majority will never vote for Bernie or AOC, not Democrats, Independents or cross over Republicans.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.6  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Split Personality @3.2.5    last year
But the majority will never vote for Bernie or AOC, not Democrats

In a primary?

The left is very good at winning democrat primaries.

 
 
 
Drakkonis
Professor Participates
3.2.7  Drakkonis  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.6    last year
The left is very good at winning democrat primaries.

Is "winning" the code word for what they actually do? 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.2.8  bugsy  replied to  Drakkonis @3.2.7    last year
for what they actually do? 

If you mean trying to destroy the country, then yes.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.2.9  TᵢG  replied to  bugsy @3.2.8    last year

You can observe Trump screwing up our nation in real time, more than any other PotUS in recent history, and you still are focused on the Ds??

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Senior Silent
3.2.10  afrayedknot  replied to  TᵢG @3.2.9    last year

Inexplicably ignoring, inexcusably enabling, and tacitly approving the assault on our national identity, values, and legacy. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.11  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Drakkonis @3.2.7    last year

I'd say so.  Unfortunately, not enough voters get involved in primaries. If they can get a progressive to win over a moderate, party affiliation takes hold in the general election and the progressive gets elected to a position of real consequence.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
3.3  Split Personality  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3    last year
Kilmar Abrego Garcia had been ordered deported long ago by both a District Court Judge and an Appellate Court Judge, both of whom found evidence that he was an M-13 gang member.
Isn't it odd that the the left won't acknowledge that Garcia received the "due process" they are crying about?

No, it's odd that certain people won't acknowledge that the 2019 case was overturned because CIS was unreliable.  The deportment order was over turned and a withhold deportation issued.  He was also allowed to find work in the US, a green card?

That evidence and paperwork from 2019 is now being brandished by an embarrassed White House is immaterial to the physical deportation in 2025.

 

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

—Martin Niemöller

Be careful what you cheer for.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.3.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Split Personality @3.3    last year
it's odd that certain people won't acknowledge that the 2019 case was overturned because CIS was unreliable.  The deportment order was over turned and a green card issued.

His 2019 deportation order was not overturned. He does not have a green card. He remains subject to deportation.  As of 2019 (because he asserts a fear of rival gangs) he could not be deported to El Salvador.  He can legally be deported anywhere in the world but El Salvador without any further act of any US Court.  

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
3.3.2  Split Personality  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.3.1    last year
He does not have a green card.

Multiple sources said he had one, including you who said it was revoked the day he was deported to.......El Salvador

He can legally be deported anywhere in the world but El Salvador without any further act of any US Court.  

Slight issue there...?

Despite the whole round them up put them on a plane, in record time, with no due process, then ignore orders to cease and desist, then further ignore the same court and send more people to El Salvador.

Tomorrow marks the 250th  anniversary of Lexington and Concorde, the first time we stood up and said,

" no more Kings, no more conscription, no more taxation without representation"

funny how history repeats itself.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.3.3  bugsy  replied to  Split Personality @3.3.2    last year
Multiple sources said he had one

Can you show proof of this.

It is known that he had a "withholding of removal order" because of his "fear" of rival gang members, but that does not make him eligible for a green card.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
3.3.4  Jack_TX  replied to  bugsy @3.3.3    last year
It is known that he had a "withholding of removal order" because of his "fear" of rival gang members, but that does not make him eligible for a green card.

He had a work permit.  

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
3.3.5  Split Personality  replied to  Jack_TX @3.3.4    last year

Correct.

An I551 Green card is for permanent alien residents with just about every right, but they cannot vote or become citizens.

He had a work visa which required him to report to ICE annually, no vote or freedom to travel as he saw fit.

 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.3.6  bugsy  replied to  Jack_TX @3.3.4    last year

Not the same as a green card. A green card is a path to citizenship. A work permit is not. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
3.3.7  Split Personality  replied to  bugsy @3.3.6    last year

Claimed no one ever.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.3.8  bugsy  replied to  Split Personality @3.3.7    last year

Claimed what?

That a green card is a path to citizenship or that a work permit is not?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
3.3.9  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Split Personality @3.3    last year
No, it's odd that certain people won't acknowledge that the 2019 case was overturned because CIS was unreliable

yeah, still waiting to see that backed up.

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

Unrelated.  But, what ever.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
3.3.10  Jack_TX  replied to  bugsy @3.3.6    last year
Not the same as a green card. A green card is a path to citizenship. A work permit is not. 

My point was simply that he was allowed to be here.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.3.11  bugsy  replied to  Jack_TX @3.3.10    last year
My point was simply that he was allowed to be here

Yes.,...until a third party country agreed to take him.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.3.12  TᵢG  replied to  bugsy @3.3.11    last year

The USA legally would not deport him to El Salvador.

The USA granted him the right to live and work in the USA.

The USA could have deported him at any time to any other nation.

The USA did not do so.  In the meantime, he has a wife (citizen), children, a job, and no criminal record.

Garcia is a better man than the asshole who accidentally sent him to El Salvador and is trying to prevent his return by lying about his gang affiliations, showing photo-shopped tattoos, etc.  just to test the limits of his power.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.3.13  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @3.3.12    last year

If Trump brings him back, he WILL again be deported somewhere.

You can take it to the bank.

The real issue isn't about due process for one illegal migrant. It is about the impossibility of granting due process to millions of illegal migrants. Something that would take a lifetime. I assume those around Biden, like Susan Rice factored that in when they let everyone in.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.3.14  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.3.13    last year
If Trump brings him back, he WILL again be deported somewhere.

Probably, because Trump is an asshole.

The real issue isn't about due process for one illegal migrant.

The real issue IS due process.   It is ALSO following the law and the CotUS.   Something that conservatives claimed to hold dear until Trump came along.   And now it is all of a sudden okay for a PotUS to not only try to defy the CotUS, but to break the law.

It is about the impossibility of granting due process to millions of illegal migrants.

And here you go proving my point.  So what is your solution, Vic, just forget about due process because it gets in the way of the objective?

I assume those around Biden, ...

Deflection.   Focus on the problems caused by the irresponsible buffoon you helped elect.

 
 
 
Gazoo
Masters Silent
3.3.15  Gazoo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.3.13    last year

“If Trump brings him back, he WILL again be deported somewhere.”

That would be a good thing because that punk offers no positives to American society, none at all.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.3.16  TᵢG  replied to  Gazoo @3.3.15    last year
That would be a good thing because that punk offers no positives to American society, none at all.

Where do you get your 'facts'?   Garcia has no criminal record, was granted the right to live and work in the USA (albeit he could be deported to any nation other than El Salvador), was gainfully employed, is married to a US citizen, and was raising a family.

On what grounds do you claim he offers nothing of value to our society?  

 
 
 
Gazoo
Masters Silent
3.3.17  Gazoo  replied to  TᵢG @3.3.16    last year

He’s a wife beater, he has ties to ms-13, he is suspected of human trafficking. Is that the kind of pos you want in this country?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.3.18  TᵢG  replied to  Gazoo @3.3.17    last year

He had a domestic dispute years ago.   His wife, however, is the jury and she desperately wants him home.  Here is how she described the situation after the domestic dispute was resolved:  

“Things did not escalate, and I decided not to follow through with the civil court process. We were able to work through this situation privately as a family, including by going to counselling. Our marriage only grew stronger in the years that followed,” she was quoted as saying by The Telegraph.

What ties to MS-13 ... Trump and others making allegations that defy the evidence?   Do you believe Trump's continued lies and photo-shopped tattoos??   If he were a member, he would be a slave to the gang.   He would not be an employed steel worker raising a family with no criminal record.

Trump, on the other hand, is a convicted felon, con-man, ..., and is damaging our nation on a weekly basis.   And here you are defending Trump's incompetent, irresponsible, illegal and unconstitutional actions.

Gain some perspective.   Garcia is a better man than Trump could ever be and he is not causing harm to this nation.   Trump is the problem, not guys like Garcia.   Trump is the "POS", not Garcia.

 
 
 
Gazoo
Masters Silent
3.3.19  Gazoo  replied to  TᵢG @3.3.18    last year

as far as ms-13 I trust LE officers assessment more than some bleeding heart left wing blather. He was stopped by TSP who suspected him of human trafficking. No, this guy is a pos, as is biden who committed the most treasonous act of any president with his open border policy. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
3.3.20  Split Personality  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.3.13    last year
It is about the impossibility of granting due process to millions of illegal migrants. Something that would take a lifetime.

We could take all of the laid off lawyers from DoJ and the FBI, make them temporary immigration judges and eliminate the 6 year backlog in two or three years.

That gives everyone due process, satisfies all parties, including the Constitution

except those that get deported anyway.

I assume

Well you know that old saying...

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
3.3.21  Split Personality  replied to  bugsy @3.3.8    last year

It's almost as if you don't read all of the comments and just have a thought pop into your helmet and insist on making a point that was not being disputed.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.3.22  TᵢG  replied to  Gazoo @3.3.19    last year

Obviously you have nothing but hearsay.   Looks like you are just believing Trump and not even bothering to investigate.

No, this guy is a pos, as is biden who committed the most treasonous act of any president with his open border policy. 

Good grief, the partisanship dripping from your comment is so over-the-top.   There is no way to not see the substantial damage Trump is doing and you are still whining about Biden and (laughably) claiming that his border policy was "the most treasonous act of any president".

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
3.3.23  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.3.13    last year
The real issue isn't about due process for one illegal migrant. It is about the impossibility of granting due process to millions of illegal migrants. Something that would take a lifetime.

Well you had better start now with hiring some more judges because we don't just throw up our hands as Americans and say , "We can't do that. It is too hard!" So let's get to work processing these people who want to be here, want to work hard, and want to make the American dream work for somebody who is willing to work for it. 

Due process is not optional. Thank you for showing your true colors.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
3.3.24  Thomas  replied to  Gazoo @3.3.19    last year

Get your news at real journalistic outlet. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.3.25  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @3.3.22    last year
  Looks like you are just believing Trump and not even bothering to investigat

Do you think the police report was faked?  Or part of a conspiracy by Maryland police that took place in 2019 to set this guy up to be deported in 2025? How deep you believe this conspiracy goes? 

since you obviously "investigated" and aren't just relying on progressive hopes and dreams, what evidence do you have that he isn't a part of MS-13? What has your investigation yielded to prove the police report false? 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.3.26  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.3.25    last year

The immigration judge did not find it credible but did find Garcia to be credible.   So if you think the judge got it wrong then provide your evidence and argument.   If not, given we have a judgment already, why would you not accept it?

As for MS-13, you have it flipped.   If you think you have credible evidence that he was a part of MS-13 then deliver it.   You are the one trying (poorly) to allege that he was.   So make your case.

I have stated that I find it unlikely that he was part of MS-13 since that would have committed him to the organization for life.   For him to live here, be married, raise a family, be gainfully employed, etc. and ALSO be a member of the gang sounds unlikely.  But, Sean, since you think you have something, let's hear your argument.

Be honest about it.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
3.3.27  Thomas  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.3.25    last year

The police report says "no priors". It is right there under the big red line. You will notice that as hard as you and your friends try to pin MS-13 on him, the courts let him remain in the country. There was no determination that he was in the gang, otherwise it would have been reported. You have nothing to tie him to the gang. You have nothing to tie him to criminal activity, otherwise, he would have been in jail or deported prior to this occurance. 

I love how you keep trying to trash this person whom you do not have the faintest clue of who he is or how he conducts his life, just because Donald Trump said to.

It is just priceless how clueless some people can be. You don't even realize that Donald Trump is trying to fuck us all.

It is ok though. We still love you.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.3.28  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Thomas @3.3.23    last year
Well you had better start now with hiring some more judges because we don't just throw up our hands as Americans and say , "We can't do that.

How many judges will give them their due process and their right to a timely trial? Maybe we should toss them in jail like we did with the Jan 6th accused and let them languish there until we have a trial date?

Or do we just give them an available trial date, say 50 years from today?

It would amount to simply letting them stay here forever.

Abraham Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus during the Civil War. It was an emergency measure. This would also be one. I say it should be done.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.3.29  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Split Personality @3.3.20    last year
That gives everyone due process, satisfies all parties, including the Constitution

It wouldn't come close.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.3.30  bugsy  replied to  Split Personality @3.3.21    last year

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
3.3.31  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.3.28    last year
How many judges will give them their due process and their right to a timely trial? Maybe we should toss them in jail like we did with the Jan 6th accused and let them languish there until we have a trial date?

There you go again, mixing up your issues. The January 6th defilers of the Capitol and Constitution were afforded due process. Some were "Really Bad People."  Should we have shipped them off to a foreign land to make them "irretrievable" like the El Presidente is suggesting we do now? I think that you would not like that.

Due process is a the right of every person in the US. Period. 

It would amount to simply letting them stay here forever.

Now there is an idea. Why don't we do that. I will even give you credit.

Abraham Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus during the Civil War. It was an emergency measure. This would also be one. I say it should be done.

We are not at war. We are not being invaded by any stretch of the imagination. There is no emergency because it is all taking place inside of your head. 

Calm down. We still love you and respect your rights anyway.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
3.3.32  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Thomas @3.3.31    last year
We are not being invaded by any stretch of the imagination.

Bullshit. I would call what has happened at the southern border is INDEED a fucking invasion. 2 Million give or take who weren't (supposedly) invited for dinner................and breakfast and lunch and and and

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
3.3.33  Thomas  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.3.32    last year

You really need to find a news source that is verifiable and correct.

But it's ok. We love you and respect your rights anyway.

 
 
 
Gazoo
Masters Silent
3.3.34  Gazoo  replied to  TᵢG @3.3.22    last year

Knock it off with the “partisan” bullshit. It’s very obvious my opinion differs from YOUR OPINION. No big deal. It’s nothing to get derogatory about.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
3.3.35  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @3.3.26    last year
The immigration judge did not find it credible but did find Garcia to be credible.  

To be fair, two out of three immigration judges did, in fact, find the evidence tying Garcia to MS-13 to be credible.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.3.36  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Thomas @3.3.31    last year

Most of the Jan6th defendants, were jailed without trial for two years, in violation of their constitutional right to a fair and speedy trial. When they got a trail, it was before a DC jury, which as we know have strong opinions, but on top of it were additionally compromised by pejorative comments about “MAGA Republicans” from President Biden.

Cynthia Hughes wrote a book of them. It was titled: "Due process denied."

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
3.3.37  Jack_TX  replied to  Thomas @3.3.27    last year
You will notice that as hard as you and your friends try to pin MS-13 on him, the courts let him remain in the country. There was no determination that he was in the gang, otherwise it would have been reported. You have nothing to tie him to the gang. You have nothing to tie him to criminal activity, otherwise, he would have been in jail or deported prior to this occurance.

He actually had three different hearings. In the first two, police used testimony of a reliable confidential informant who identified Garcia as an MS-13 member.  The third judge refused to accept that testimony, and the govt really didn't have other compelling evidence.  After his third hearing, he was granted permission to stay in the US and given a work permit.  Since then, he seems to have behaved as a reasonably law abiding member of society.

So it is factually correct to say a court found him to be an MS-13 member.  It is also factually correct to say a court found insufficient evidence of same.  

I'm not sure if or how his situation may have changed when MS-13 was classified as a Foreign Terrorist Organization earlier this year.  I don't know if that changes anything, and if so what it might mean.

I'm personally of the opinion that he was deported illegally (by mistake) and we should do what we can to get him back.  I suspect our officials are trying to get him back and El Salvador is probably playing some hardball, hoping to squeeze us for a little something in return.  I don't have any evidence of that, but it doesn't seem a huge stretch of the imagination.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.3.38  Sean Treacy  replied to  Thomas @3.3.27    last year
The police report says "no priors". It is right there under the big red line

And you probably think that means something. The informant, and the local gang unit, the only independent people involved, said he's a member. Why do you keep ignoring that?

You will notice that as hard as you and your friends try to pin MS-13 on him, the courts let him remain in the country

You don't seem to understand what's happening.  He was only allowed to stay in the country because he claimed a rival to MS-13 would kill him if he was returned to El Salvador, which in fact lends credence to the fact that he was in fact a member of MS-13.   

ove how you keep trying to trash this person whom you do not have the faintest clue of who he is or how he conducts his life, just because Donald Trump said to

I love how you keep making false claims about an illegal immigrant who you've met because progressives tell you to. 

t is just priceless how clueless some people can be

It sure is.  Look at all the "biden is fine" people walking around. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.3.39  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @3.3.26    last year
he immigration judge did not find it credible but did find Garcia to be credible.

Except for the Judges who did. Be honest.  Please cite the specific judge who found Garcia credible on his Ms13 claim, because I can’t any record of that . 

 So if you think the judge got it wrong then provide your evidence and argument. 

Two Judges found that he was a member.  He only avoided deportation to El Salvador because he claimed a rival gang would hurt him.

 But, Sean, since you think you have something, let's hear your argument.

They've been provided many times. You have thestesitmony of the Local PD and a CI who identified him as a member. two judges agreed.  His deportation to El Salvador (and El Salvador only)  was prevented, not because he wasn't a member of MS-13, but because he told the Court  he feared harm from a rival gang.  Are gangs more likely to target  members of rival gangs or innocent civilians, do you think. Be honest. 

Be honest about ite.

Please take that advice

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.3.40  Sean Treacy  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.3.39    last year

And to be clear, the Judge in 2019 who granted the application for withholding that prevented his deportation  to el Salvador did not rule on, or even address, whether he was  a member of Ms-13.. It was not an issue before the Judge. The judge was only concerned with whether he faced persecution if he returned to El Salvador. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.3.41  TᵢG  replied to  Gazoo @3.3.34    last year

The bullshit is from you.   You put forth the ridiculous accusation that Biden is the most treasonous PotUS when deflecting from this Garcia mess Trump created.

Not only is your accusation utterly ridiculous, it shows yet again a failure to even recognize the wrongful acts of Trump.

 
 
 
Gazoo
Masters Silent
3.3.42  Gazoo  replied to  TᵢG @3.3.41    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
3.3.43  Thomas  replied to  Jack_TX @3.3.37    last year

You are incorrect. The first two were hearings over whether he should be released pending trial and made no judgement of the veracity of the claim that he was MS-13. The third the judge did not find that he was a member. 

My research assistant (ChatGPT) was kind enough to summarize for me:

​Based on available court documents and official records, Kilmar Abrego Garcia has not been found by any court to be a member of the MS-13 gang.​

Key Findings:

  • March 28, 2019 Incident : Abrego Garcia was stopped by Prince George’s County police in Hyattsville, Maryland, along with three other men. A “Gang Field Interview Sheet” was completed, labeling him as an MS-13 member based on his attire and a confidential informant's claim. However, this informant was never cross-examined in court. ​ Wikipedia+4NBC4 Washington+4WTOP News+4 
  • Credibility of the Officer : The officer who authored the gang report, Ivan Mendez, was later suspended and ultimately fired for misconduct unrelated to this case. He was placed on a "do not call" list by the Prince George’s County State’s Attorney, indicating he was deemed unfit to testify in court. ​ Truthout+3NBC4 Washington+3WTOP News+3 Truthout

  • Immigration Court Proceedings : An immigration judge denied Abrego Garcia's bond in 2019, citing the gang field interview sheet as evidence. However, no criminal charges were filed against him, and he has no criminal record in the U.S. or El Salvador. ​ Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre+8NBC4 Washington+8WTOP News+8 
  • Deportation and Legal Challenges : Despite a court order protecting him from removal due to threats from gangs in El Salvador, Abrego Garcia was deported in March 2025. The deportation was later acknowledged as an "administrative error" by officials. The U.S. Supreme Court and federal courts have since ruled the deportation unlawful and ordered his return, but the administration has yet to comply. ​ Supreme Court+18AP News+18The Cut+18 PolitiFact+5Time+5AP News+5 Axios+5The Cut+5AP News+5 
  • Public Allegations and Evidence : The Trump administration has publicly alleged that Abrego Garcia is affiliated with MS-13, citing various pieces of evidence, including a photograph purportedly showing gang-related tattoos. However, experts have dismissed these claims, noting that the tattoos are not recognized MS-13 symbols and that the photograph appears to have been altered. ​ elpais.com+5PolitiFact+5Wikipedia+5 

Conclusion:

There is no court ruling or official legal finding confirming that Kilmar Abrego Garcia is a member of MS-13. The allegations against him are primarily based on unverified claims and a field interview conducted by a discredited officer. Multiple courts have found the government's actions in his deportation to be unlawful, and he remains detained in El Salvador despite these rulings.​ WTOP News

For further details, you can refer to the official court documents and reports:

If you need assistance accessing specific court documents or further information, feel free to ask.

Which is really all beside the point that his Due Process rights have been violated per the findings of the district court and the Supreme Court and the Administration has been told to Facilitate his return, which it is not doing. 

The Administration is as crooked and sadistic as they can get. How much does it take to make  some people see this??

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.3.44  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.3.39    last year

No judge has ruled explicitly on Garcia's alleged membership in MS-13.   The judges you referred to merely denied him bond based on the allegations of membership and his attire.   The judge (David Jones) who granted Garcia the Withholding of Removal did so knowing the prior judges' response to the allegations of his MS-13 membership.    He noted that he found Garcia's testimony to be credible.   He made no exception such as ("credible except for his denial of MS-13 membership).

And MS-13 membership is an importance consideration.   If Jones had been convinced that Garcia was an MS-13 member he would run counter to 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3): "...   there are reasonable grounds to believe that the alien is a danger to the security of the United  States. "

The government did no appeal his decision and ICE granted him the ability to work in the USA.    Given there was no evidence of MS-13 membership and the actions of the government to allow him to stay (he reported to ICE annually) and work in the USA illustrates that he was not considered a member of MS-13.   In fact, there is no evidence that links him to MS-13 other than a claim by an untrustworthy witness.   

The most recent judge on this matter, Judge Xinis, provided this as part of her opinion:  

Xinis noted in her opinion Sunday that the Justice Department presented “no evidence” that Abrego Garcia belongs to MS-13, effectively abandoning that position in her court. But by labeling him a gang member publicly, the judge noted that it placed him at particular risk in El Salvador’s prison, which she noted “intentionally mixes rival gang members.”

Bottom line, the only tie to MS-13 are weak allegations by non credible people and presumptions based upon appearance.  In contrast, the evidence is that Garcia has no criminal record, is married to a citizen, is raising three children, and is working as an apprentice steel worker.   He fled El Salvador because the Barrio 18 gang was extorting his family and trying to force recruit him into their gang.

The Trump administration broke the law by deporting him to El Salvador.   And now they are sickeningly lying about Garcia being an MS-13 gang member even to the point of Trump himself showing photoshopped tattoos.

I would not try to defend Trump in this matter.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.3.45  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @3.3.35    last year

They found that the allegations were sufficient to deny his bond.   Big difference.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
3.3.46  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Thomas @3.3.43    last year
How much does it take to make  some people see this??

TOO MUCH !

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.3.47  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @3.3.44    last year
No judge has ruled explicitly on Garcia's alleged membership in MS-13.

Yet you claimed a judge found it not  credible. When did that happen?

 The judges you referred to merely denied him bond based on the allegations of membership and his attire. 

Lol. "Merely"... You are putting on a master class in goalpost moving.   The only  judges who  considered whether he was an MS -13 member found the allegations credible and used  them as a basis to issue a ruling denying  bail.  To quote you asking about an imaginary ruling that never happened " if you think the judge got it wrong then provide your evidence and argument.If not, given we have a judgment already, why would you not accept it?  "

Why indeed won't you follow your own argument and accept the Judge's ruling that their was enough evidence of MS-13 membership to deny him bail. Or do you only want people to defer to imaginary rulings by judges? 

.    He noted that he found Garcia's testimony to be credible

Now this is truly breathtaking. You don't even pretend to make a consistent argument from point to point. First, you dismiss the judges who actually weighed whether he was a member of MS-13 and issued a ruling based upon it because you don't like how they ruled.  Then you turn around and  claim a judge who never addressed the MS-13 issue a actually addressed whether he was an ms-13 member and decided he wasn't.  He just never got around to actually writing that down anywhere. But we should apparently accept that projection of your own creation onto a ruling despite what the Judge worte, while simultaneously ignoring the judges who actually considered the issue, weighed the evidence  and made an actual judgment based on it.  

It's simply astounding you would even would even attempt that after dismissing the judges' rulings who actually considered his Ms-13 membership and used it as a basis in a substantive ruling.   

The Judge who heard the removal issue found Garcia credible regarding  threats from Ms-13's rival gang and wrote about why he found those threats credible. You don't seem to understand this, but that's  what the hearing about. Was in danger in El Salvador, or not.   That's it.  It wasn't whether he was a danger here. That was already decided and that's why he was being held without bail before his deportation.  The issue the removal judge was focusing on was solely  whether he could be legally deported to El Salvador given the threats from MS-13's rival. That he deserved to be deported, and could be deported anywhere else  in the world, was not even up for debate at that hearing. 

, the only tie to MS-13 are weak allegations by non credible people and presumptions based upon appearance

They were good enough for the immigration judge who heard his case and the judges he appealed to. Certainly, no immigration judge ever claimed otherwise. You have no basis to support an argument that he wasn't a member, other than your feelings. Certainly, if you gave the weight to immigration judges decisions when you mistakenly  thought they were in your favor, you'd accept he was an Ms-13 member. But that require a consistent, logical approach and not just grasping at whatever straws you can piece together to justify the result you want. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.3.48  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.3.47    last year
Yet you claimed a judge found it not  credible. When did that happen?

When he decided to grant withholding of removal.   As I just described.

The only  judges who  considered whether he was an MS -13 member found the allegations credible and used  them as a basis to issue a ruling denying  bail.  

No judge ruled that he was an MS-13 member.   The other judges held that he could have been and ruled against his bond.   That is fundamentally different from ruling that he was a member.

Then you turn around and  claim a judge who never addressed the MS-13 issue a actually addressed whether he was an ms-13 member and decided he wasn't. 

You are intentionally not following.  Real simple, no judges ruled he was or was not an MS-13 member.   All judges considered the affiliation.   The first two held that he was likely to be a member and ruled against the bond.  The third judge granted a withholding of removal which, based on the legal requirements I noted, means the judge was not convinced that Garcia was an MS-13 member.   The last judge stated that there is no credible evidence that Garcia is an MS-13 member.

Because, Sean, there is no credible evidence that Garcia is an MS-13 member.    The evidence (as I described: gainfully employed, family man, no criminal record, ...) illustrates that he is NOT an MS-13 member.

Your theatrics will not change the facts.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.3.49  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @3.3.48    last year

[deleted]

[✘] They weren't asked, and had no authority to "rule he was a member of MS-13." Your whole argumetn is based on the impossible. The Judges only rule on whether it more likely than not he was a member . They did so.

The third judge granted a withholding of removal which, based on the legal requirements I noted, means the judge was not convinced that Garcia was an MS-13 member.

100% false. The only thing the third judge considered was whether he faced persecution in El Salvador if returned there. That's it. By all means, provide a like to the Judge writing that he didn't find the evidence of gang membership credible and was withholding removal because he didn't find allegations of his gang membership credible.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
3.3.58  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.3.49    last year

This is not directed to Sean

The remainder of this thread was removed for no value. Knock it off. Only warning!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4  JohnRussell    last year
 Only yesterday I heard one repeat the nonsense about "what law did he break?

Its a shame that we have to go through this with you every day. 

Being in the country illegally is not punishable by being sent to a foreign prison. 

There has not been a single judicial ruling yet that said what Trump has done is ok. Some of the rulings saying it is not ok have come from conservative judges. 

Do you believe that the courts decide what is and isnt against the law, or should a pathological liar convicted felon make our laws? 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4    last year
Being in the country illegally is not punishable by being sent to a foreign prison. 

He did violate the law.

His wife accused him of domestic violence but was afraid to show up for court appearances. He also just missed on being included in a trafficking trial. By the same logic you have used here in the past, just because he didn't get charged, doesn't mean he didn't do it?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1    last year

It is a true waste of time to discuss with you something so obvious.  This is America, we dont put people in prison who have not been convicted of a crime. 

Everyone knows Trump tried to steal the 2020 election. Maybe Biden should have kidnapped him and put him in prison after Trump left office. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.1    last year
It is a true waste of time to discuss with you something so obvious. 

Perhaps one needs to follow orders. It is your call.


This is America, we dont put people in prison who have not been convicted of a crime. 

In America we know the difference between a foreign national and a US citizen.

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
4.1.3  goose is back  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.1    last year
This is America, we dont put people in prison who have not been convicted of a crime. 

You're right JR, he should be released and then deported to Bangladesh or some other shithole country.  

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.1.4  bugsy  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1    last year
just because he didn't get charged, doesn't mean he didn't do it

That was their argument against Trump for almost a decade.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.1.5  Split Personality  replied to  bugsy @4.1.4    last year

A lot of people feel that way about the Trumps all the way back to 1973.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.1.6  bugsy  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1    last year
His wife accused him of domestic violence but was afraid to show up for court appearances.

She was interviewed by an anchor the other day. He asked her "Were you in fear of your life". She paused for an extended time, then sad..."My husband is alive. That is all that is important". 

Of course she was in fear of her life, otherwise, if she said no, then the police could charge her with filing a false police report.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @4    last year
[deleted]
[✘] There has not been a single judicial ruling yet that said what Trump has done is ok.

A district court and appellate court ruled for his deportation. That is what happened, he was deported. His home country is who put him in prison.

Do you believe that the courts decide what is and isnt against the law, or should a pathological liar convicted felon make our laws?

Despite what you THINK happened, the law was followed.

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.2    last year

The administration admitted to an initial mistake. I guess some missed that part.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.2.2  Split Personality  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.1    last year

I guess some missed the point that the White House is waiving 2019 paperwork which was rendered moot when a judge threw out the sketchy CUIS' "identification". and instead protected Garcia from deportation on that basis 6 years ago.

Deporting him in less than 24 hours without an additional hearing is an affront to the authority of that 2019 court.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.2.3  Split Personality  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.2    last year
A district court and appellate court ruled for his deportation.

That was appealed in 2019 and Garcia got a very rare win, so rare, that it appears the Court was right

  That is what happened, he was deported. 

 years later with no additional due process, in violation of a standing order to NOT  deport him.

His home country is who put him in prison. 

Then why is this country paying them $6Million?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.2.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  Split Personality @4.2.3    last year
was appealed in 2019 and Garcia got a very rare win, so rare, that it appears the Court was right

It's exceptionally easy.  You just have to claim fear of harm  and show it's more likely than not reasonably grounded. He claimed to fear a rival gang if he returned to El Salvador, hence he won the withholding of removal to El Salvador, and El Salvador only.  He did not "win" because he wasn't an MS-13 member. 

ter with no additional due process, in violation of a standing order to NOT  deport him

No additional due process is required to deport him, and no standing order not to deport him exists.  He only can't be deported to EL Salvador without further due process. Since Bukele has now destroyed the gang he claims to fear in El Salvador, a rehearing would probably result in him being able to be deported back to El Salvador. 

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
4.2.5  Thomas  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.2.4    last year

The government, and you, have yet to prove that he is an MS 13 member. That is the point.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.2.6  bugsy  replied to  Thomas @4.2.5    last year

Simple question.

If an immigration judge ordered him to not be deported to El Salvador because he would be in danger from RIVAL GANG MEMBERS, what would that make him?

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
4.2.7  1stwarrior  replied to  bugsy @4.2.6    last year

For a claim for asylum, the candidate must show there is fear that the GOVERNMENT is threatening him - rival gangs don't weigh in.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.2.8  bugsy  replied to  1stwarrior @4.2.7    last year

True, but I believe  the order was for him to not get sent to El Salvador because of the threat of rival gangs.

That is what has been reported by several agencies. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.2.9  TᵢG  replied to  bugsy @4.2.8    last year

Presented in defense of Garcia to the SCotUS:  

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

For years, Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia lived in Beltsville, Maryland, with his wife, Plaintiff Jennifer Stefania Vasquez Sura (a U.S. citizen), and their three special needs children: D.T.V., X.T.V., and Plaintiff A.A.V. (all U.S. citizens). SA015; SA021. Abrego Garcia, a citizen of El Salvador, came to the United States as a teenager to escape gang violence targeting his family. SA002-003; SA145-146. He has never been charged with any crime. SA147; SA018; SA021. In 2019, the Government commenced removal proceedings. SA146. Abrego Garcia moved for release on bond. SA146. The Government opposed, claiming he was an MS-13 gang member. SA146. The Government offered two pieces of “evidence”: first, Abrego Garcia was wearing “his Chicago Bulls hat and hoodie,” and second, “a vague, uncorroborated allegation from a confidential informant claiming he belonged to MS-13’s ‘Western’ clique in New York—a place he has never lived.” SA146 n.5; Add010-011. 2 The immigration judge was “reluctant to give evidentiary weight to the Respondent’s clothing as an indication of gang affiliation,” but nevertheless refused to release Abrego Garcia on bond. Add047-048; SA146.

Abrego Garcia then sought relief from removal. SA001-002. During a full evidentiary hearing, Abrego Garcia offered his own sworn testimony, that of his wife, Vasquez Sura, and voluminous evidence showing he was not a gang member and was eligible for protection under federal law. SA002-004; SA017. The immigration judge ordered withholding of removal on October 10, 2019. SA014. The judge found Abrego Garcia “credible,” observing that his “testimony was internally consistent, externally consistent” with the “substantial documentation,” and “appeared free of embellishment.” SA005. The judge further found that there was “a clear probability of future persecution” if Abrego Garcia returned to El Salvador. SA008. The judge therefore ordered that Abrego Garcia had the “right not to be deported” to El Salvador under 8 U.S.C. §1231(b)(3)(A). SA006; SA014. The Government never appealed that order, so it became final. SA147. Since 2019, Abrego Garcia has lived with his family in Maryland, working full time as a union sheet metal worker and dutifully appearing for annual check-ins with immigration authorities (most recently in January 2025). SA147.
 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
4.2.10  1stwarrior  replied to  TᵢG @4.2.9    last year

Opinion based comments.  Waiting for facts to be addressed - which will be a while from now.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.2.11  TᵢG  replied to  1stwarrior @4.2.10    last year

This was argued in front of the SCotUS.   It is a clear fact that Garcia was granted a withholding from removal in 2019 that made it illegal to deport him to El Salvador and that he was married to a US citizen, raising kids, no criminal record, no legal conclusion that he was associated with a gang, and was working to support his family as a union sheet metal worker.

Given your nuh-uh platitude, I expect you will never accept as fact anything that shows the Trump administration illegally deported Garcia.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.2.12  Split Personality  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.2.4    last year
It's exceptionally easy.

You are contradicting yourself again

He did not "win" because he wasn't an MS-13 member. 

Is that in my evidence councilor?

He only can't be deported to EL Salvador without further due process.

You do realize that he has been deported to El Salvador, correct?

Since Bukele has now destroyed the gang he claims to fear in El Salvador, 

Immaterial.  The idea of declaring a certain gang "foreign terrorists" and deportable under a 227 year old war time act is a deplorable overreach which will certainly be addressed by SCOTUS.

Last night SCOTUS, voted 7 to 2, to pause further deportations of migrants using the wartime act, without judicial review.

On top of the legal semantics and language stretches, the POTUS also suggested treating "America's worst" the same way.

Trump just doesn't care about the law or people.  Since the 1970's its always been something to circumvent if possible and tie opponents up in court indefinitely if possible. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.2.13  Split Personality  replied to  1stwarrior @4.2.10    last year

This may help.  You may label it opinion but it seems to be fair enough.

25 Facts About Kilmar Abrego Garcia - by Gabe Fleisher

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.2.14  Split Personality  replied to  bugsy @4.2.8    last year

His claim for asylum was denied because the time limits had expired and Convention Against Torture was also denied.

However the judge said it was "a clear probability" that he would be persecuted and granted a withholding order for El Salvador only,

which is where he ended up ...

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.2.15  bugsy  replied to  Split Personality @4.2.14    last year
that he would be persecuted  

By whom? If he did not have a record in El Salvador, or he was not a known gang member, whay would he be persecuted by anyone?

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.2.16  Split Personality  replied to  bugsy @4.2.15    last year

The family has(had?) a farm that was being shaken down by the B...18  gang, that's why he ran.

His brother Cecil came here years before and is naturalized already, so he came here, illegally, to join his brother.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.2.17  bugsy  replied to  Split Personality @4.2.16    last year

His argument to stay and the reason it was granted is because he was afraid of RIVAL GANG MEMBERS. What does that make him?

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.2.18  Split Personality  replied to  bugsy @4.2.17    last year
RIVAL GANG MEMBERS

Do you find this language in the withhold deportation order? I doubt a judge would use that wording since it undermine his/her judgement.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.2.19  bugsy  replied to  Split Personality @4.2.18    last year

No you wouldn't and I never claimed that. 

Kilmar made the claim that he would be in danger from rival gang members if he were returned to El Salvador. The judge agreed for some reason and put a stay on his return there, but there was never a stop order to be deported somewhere else.

" a 2019 order blocking the feds’ ability to remove him to El Salvador on the grounds that he was at risk of retaliation from gangs,"

Alleged MS-13 gangbanger Kilmar Abrego Garcia's rank, street name revealed as fight over deportation to El Salvador mega-prison rages: docs

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.2.20  Split Personality  replied to  bugsy @4.2.19    last year
No you wouldn't and I never claimed that

Yes You do every time you keep saying RIVAL.

That isn't the language in the Judge's order.  The "Docs" also are from 2019 are alleged, by DHS & ICE, based on an informant.

Kilmar made the claim that he would be in danger from rival gang members if he were returned to El Salvador.

No he said he and his family were being threatened by the B?18 gang.

The Judge who issued the withhold deportation to El Salvador did not believe the informant, hence the judgement.

The judge agreed for some reason and put a stay on his return there, but there was never a stop order to be deported somewhere else.

No one is disputing that.

 "a 2019 order blocking the feds’ ability to remove him to El Salvador on the grounds that he was at risk of retaliation from gangs,"

Block quoting from that newspaper is hardly an establishment of fact in a court room.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.2.21  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.2    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5  author  Vic Eldred    last year

"I said my main goal of this trip was to meet with Kilmar. Tonight I had that chance. I have called his wife, Jennifer, to pass along his message of love. I look forward to providing a full update upon my return."

Gox22O-XQAANPKR?format=jpg&name=small
Senator Chris Van Hollen on X: "I said my main goal of this trip was to meet with Kilmar. Tonight I had that chance. I have called his wife, Jennifer, to pass along his message of love. I look forward to providing a full update upon my return. https://t.co/U9y2gZpxCb" / X

I'm sure his wife was delighted to hear about his "love."

And I'm very certain that she is glad that he is locked up in a secure prison.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
5.1  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @5    last year

With those two statements, it's well past the time for you to dump your latest avatar.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Vic Eldred @5    last year

I bet Van Hollen's wife wished he would look at her as caringly as he's looking at Garcia.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
5.3  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @5    last year

Another day, another perfidious column

And I'm very certain that [His Wife] is glad that he is locked up in a secure prison.

Do you have verified sources for this? Wednesday she seemed like she wanted him home. CBS

"After surviving domestic violence in a previous relationship, I acted out of caution after a disagreement with Kilmar by seeking a civil protective order in case things escalated," Vasquez said. "Things did not escalate, and I decided not to follow through with the civil court process. We were able to work through this situation privately as a family, including by going to counseling. Our marriage only grew stronger in the years that followed. No one is perfect, and no marriage is perfect. That is not a justification for ICE's action of abducting him and deporting him to a country where he was supposed to be protected from deportation. Kilmar has always been a loving partner and father, and I will continue to stand by him and demand justice for him."
 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6  author  Vic Eldred    last year

Yesterday President Trump also had time to meet with what some might consider the strongest Leader in the European Union.

GowTuhZbwAACP7z?format=jpg&name=small

The discussion centered on trade.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7  author  Vic Eldred    last year

It looks like a quiet day around here.

I bet I know what it is. I note that spring has arrived in Boston.

DgeS4J_WAAImq7k?format=jpg&name=small

I'll bet many of our members are out taking a walk!

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
7.1  Split Personality  replied to  Vic Eldred @7    last year

Many are celebrating the ride of Paul Revere

or Good Friday which many seem to think is a holiday.

Tomorrow is the 250th anniversary of the skirmishes at Concorde and Lexington.

The beginning of this grand experiment and the Constitution which protects all equally, or not.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8  author  Vic Eldred    last year

Goy6qSXW4AAo5Ge?format=jpg&name=small

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
8.1  MrFrost  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    last year

He's a POS and a terrible actor. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9  Jeremy Retired in NC    last year
NY AG Letitia James calls Trump admin allegations of mortgage fraud ‘baseless’: interview

New York state Attorney General Letitia James said in a new interview that the Trump administration’s criminal referral of her for mortgage fraud is “baseless” but declined to give details.

James appeared on Spectrum NY1’s “Inside City Hall” Thursday, attempting to swat down allegations from the Trump administration that she falsified real estate records in Virginia and New York.

“Let me just say to all New Yorkers and to all Americans: The allegations are baseless. The allegations are nothing more than a revenge tour,” James told   NY1 political anchor Errol Louis.  

Baseless...

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
9.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9    last year
The allegations are baseless. The allegations are nothing more than a revenge tour,”

Karma is a nasty bitch sometimes, no? Poor thing.............

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9.1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @9.1    last year

This imbecile didn't think that anybody would find out.  Probably based on her position and perceived control of investigators.  Such a horrible miscalculation.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
10  Dismayed Patriot    last year
some kind of folk hero. Another folk hero for the left.

I'm still seeing zero evidence of the majority of Democrats considering any of these people "folk hero's". That is pure hyperbolic bullshit rhetoric.

All you do is list four very different situations, lump them together and then claim they are heros of the left. I don't recall anyone here or anywhere who is saying Luigi shouldn't be held accountable for his crime. You had to pull some ridiculous interview with some likely single desperate technology reporter who thinks a criminal is hot. That does not make him a "hero of the left".

Please show me where any Democrats here or elsewhere are actually standing up saying Karmelo Anthony shouldn't be held accountable for his crime? All you do is point out that a gofund me was started for his legal defense. How the fuck does that make him a "hero of the left"?

As for Kilmar Abrego Garcia, those outraged by his rendition and forced deportation to an El Salvadorian prison is 100% based on a fierce defense of due process and the constitution. Anyone claiming it's anything other than that are complete fucking morons or just partisan shills trying to sell lies, or probably both.

So instead of continuing to post these tired seeds chock full of bullshit opinion, why not try and actually look at the real reason Democrats are upset by the Trump administration trampling the rule of law. So far, the defense from the right seems to be "Yeah, well they were bad guys so who gives a fuck about the rule of law!". That works great until you're on the other end of that and others are claiming you're guilty and want to string you up without due process because everyone around you has been convinced of your guilt before even getting to present your defense. We already know what that looks like and we've even seen those rabid mobs of idiots recently...

2017-08-12t080132z-1893804928-rc1223b41d70-rtrmadp-3-virginia-protests.jpg?v=653dd6912cdd8596c9bfea812c355f95

bigots-get-boost-from-bully-pulpit.jpg

Lest we forget what heroes the right worship.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
10.1  Ronin2  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @10    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
10.1.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Ronin2 @10.1    last year
Why are you showing pictures of Ukrainian Nazis?

Hilarious attempt at deflection noted.

Republicans for the most part don't support that Fascist shithole.

Again, the lengths that some tired witless conservatives go to when they are desperately trying to rewrite the narrative in their favor is adorable. No one actually believes Ukraine is a fascist shithole other than those who have drunk the poisoned RT media cool-aid and are snuggling up under Putin's ball sack for protection. Fuck those worthless treasonous pieces of Putin loving fascist trash.

As for Garcia- talk to the judges that issued his deportation orders that were never carried out. He had his due process twice. Why do Democrats repeatedly ignore facts?

The facts:

In 2019, an immigration judge granted him "withholding of removal" status—a rare alternative to  asylum —due to the danger he faced from gang violence if he returned to El Salvador. This status allowed him to live and work legally in the United States. At the time of his deportation in 2025, he was living in  Maryland  with his wife and children, all American citizens, and was complying with annual check-ins with  U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement  (ICE).

On April 10, 2025, the  Supreme Court of the United States  unanimously [ c ]  ruled that Abrego Garcia's removal to El Salvador was illegal. [ 18 ]  The Court rejected the administration's defense, which claimed it lacked the legal authority to exercise jurisdiction over El Salvador and secure his return. Justice  Sotomayor  noted that this argument implied the government "could deport and incarcerate any person, including  U.S. citizens , without legal consequence, so long as it does so before a court can intervene."

In March 2019,   Prince George's County, Maryland   police arrested Abrego Garcia and three other men in a   Home Depot   parking lot, where they were seeking work as   day laborers . [ 2 ] [ 26 ]   One of the men claimed Abrego Garcia was a "gang member," but   The Atlantic   reported that, according to court filings, the man offered no proof and police said they did not believe him. [ 26 ]   Abrego Garcia was never charged with a crime in connection to his arrest. [ 27 ]

Police handed custody of Abrego Garcia over to ICE for deportation proceedings. In those proceedings, the government claimed that he was a member of the   MS-13   criminal gang because "he was wearing a   Chicago Bulls   hat and a hoodie with rolls of money   covering the eyes, ears and mouth   of the presidents" when arrested, and alleged that such clothes are "indicative of the Hispanic gang culture"

The government additionally cited a confidential informant who claimed that Garcia was active with an MS-13 clique based in New York, [ 2 ]  where he has never lived. [ 21 ]  The informant also claimed that Garcia held the MS-13 rank of  chequeo , though  chequeo  is not a rank within the gang and instead refers to yet-to-be-initiated recruits. [ 23 ]  ICE relied on information from a form that was filled out by a local police officer who was suspended not long after for "giving confidential information about a case to a sex worker", and thus was unavailable when Abrego Garcia's lawyer sought more information

Aruna Sury of the  Immigration Legal Resource Center  notes the fact that while information contained in I-213s is almost entirely  hearsay , such information is still considered inherently trustworthy and admissible in immigration proceedings. [ 29 ] [ 30 ]  An immigration judge in a  bond hearing  determined that the informant's claim [ 31 ]  was sufficient evidence for the purpose of denying Abrego Garcia's  bond  request; another judge upheld that ruling on appeal, saying the claim was not clearly wrong. [ 25 ]  However, no court has ever made a "full adjudication" of this issue. [ 25 ]  David Bier, associate director of immigration studies at the  Cato Institute , notes that the standards of evidence are lower in an immigration bond hearing than in a trial; in a bond hearing, the government's statement is assumed true and the  burden of proof  is on the defendant.

While awaiting the resolution of his deportation proceedings, Abrego Garcia married Vasquez Sura in June 2019, and they had a child together later that year, who is a U.S. citizen. He and his wife were also raising her two children from an earlier relationship, and all three children have  special needs . [ 2 ] [ 34 ]  Abrego Garcia and his family lived in Maryland.

A few months after his marriage, Abrego Garcia applied for  asylum  and withholding of removal. [ 35 ]  His request for asylum was denied, as one must submit an asylum application within a year of arriving in the U.S. [ 2 ] [ 36 ]  However, an immigration judge, David M. Jones, granted him "withholding of removal" status that would prevent his deportation to El Salvador due to the threat that gangs would pose to him, finding that there was a "clear probability of future persecution" there and that he had "demonstrated that [El Salvador's] [ d ]  authorities were and would be unable or unwilling to protect him." - Deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia - Wikipedia

So no, there were no prior deportation orders that were not followed, he was granted "withholding of removal" status that should have prevented his deportation to El Salvador as even the Supreme court has confirmed. Due process was not served.

What the rights argument really comes down to is that there are a bunch of bitter lazy fucking useless conservative bigots screaming and whining about brown "foreigners" being given asylum in America which the bigots see as eroding their white nationalist white supremacist conservative Christian culture.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
10.2  bugsy  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @10    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
11  Jack_TX    last year
Karmelo Anthony was the kid who went to a football game packing a knife and sat in the opposing team section causing a commotion. When another boy asked him to leave Karmelo stabbed him in the heart.

Point of clarification.....

It was a track meet.  Anthony was in the tent of one of the opposing teams (he did not belong there, but it's not unusual and generally a problem).  He was told to leave by another student, Austin Metcalf, not a coach or adult supervisor.  Words were exchanged, Metcalf shoved Anthony, and Anthony stabbed him. 

Now... WTF he was doing with that knife in his bag at this track meet is a very, very good question.  

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
11.1  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Jack_TX @11    last year
WTF he was doing with that knife in his bag at this track meet is a very, very good question.

Maybe trying to cut off a few seconds of his time in the 600 meter

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
11.2  MrFrost  replied to  Jack_TX @11    last year

Now... WTF he was doing with that knife in his bag at this track meet is a very, very good question.  

So? Second amendment!!!!!

 
 

Who is online










102 visitors