No one is above the law.
The Justice Department charged Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) on Monday over a scuffle in which ICE agents were pushed and shoved. Some may think protestors have a right to put their hands on law enforcement officers. They don't.
In this case it is a matter of progressive politicians opposed to Trump's immigration policy putting themselves at legal risk. The Department of Homeland Security has pointed to body camera footage of what they say is McIver elbowing an ICE agent during the arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka. In the meantime, McIver has strongly denied assaulting law enforcement during the clash, saying she was the one who was assaulted. Progressives all seem to have the same illness. They ignore facts.
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has drawn a bright red line. She said: "If any person, regardless of political party, influence or status, assaults a law enforcement officer as we witnessed Congresswoman McIver do, you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law." McIver may draw one of those blue district juries that uses nullification over justice, but she will still have to hire a lawyer. The FBI also arrested a Wisconsin judge last month for allegedly helping an undocumented defendant avoid arrest by ICE agents. She has been indicted and like McIver, claims innocence.
In other news:
House Speaker Mike Johnson faces another enormous task in getting House Republicans on the same page in getting a big, beautiful bill sent out to the Senate by Memorial Day. There are many Republican dissenters on the bill.
President Trump told Bret Baier that people were starving in Gaza, and he wanted to get food to them. Thus, Israel began allowing food in yesterday. The Israeli Prime Minister is trying to balance himself between domestic right-wing political allies who oppose sending food to Gaza, and foreign allies like Trump who want to prevent a famine in Gaza. The UN has thus far been incompetent or worse.
Trump and Vladimir Putin spoke for hours yesterday to no avail. Putin repeated his unrealistic demands, and Trump may finally be ready to walk away. Volodymyr Zelensky spoke with Trump before and after the Putin call.
The Supreme Court said the Trump administration could revoke protections for nearly 350,000 Venezuelan immigrants, at least for now. It was an emergency ruling while lower courts hear a challenge to the move.
Trump signed a bill, the "Take it Down Act," that requires social media platforms to remove revenge porn and explicit A.I. deepfakes.
The Justice Department opened a Civil Rights investigation into the mayor of Chicago to see if he had engaged in discrimination by hiring only Black people to senior positions.
Before Joe Biden announced that he had prostate cancer, Democrats had been criticizing his 2024 campaign. They are now expressing unending sympathy. The timing of the announcement is very suspicious.
The activist president of CBS News, Wendy McMahon, was forced to resign over publicly supporting a “60 Minutes” producer who resigned because of tensions over Trump coverage.
The latest Insider Advantage poll, conducted between May 17-19 among 1,000 likely voters, gives Trump a net approval rating of +11 points, 55 percent approving and 44 percent disapproving, with a margin of error of +/- 3 percentage points.
Tags
Who is online
157 visitors
Good morning and welcome to the news.
I'm thinking about the relationship of older men and younger women. In the case of Bill Belichick there is a 50-year difference.
Bill Belichick and Jordon Hudson. Jared C. Tilton/Getty Images
I think it helps to have money. Jordan Hudson might say I took a shortcut in life.
That USED to be true in America.
I'm 27 years older than my wife, and I don't have money. LOL
More power to you, believe it or not I am the product of such a marriage.
Then you KNOW, as I do, how good it can be.
You bet!
The very people who kept shrieking "NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW" are now crying that one of their own has been charged.
Where were these protests as previous administrations enforced a similar immigration policy?
[✘] She apparently doesn't know that Baraka wasn't authorized to be part of their little attempted break in as part of that "lawful oversight".
Instead Representative Dipshit made herself into a criminal.
My fingers are crossed!
Then there is the hilarious statement from the Democrats
I really am surprised they haven’t started screaming ‘racism’ yet…..or have they?
They haven't exhausted the "where is the assault" bullshit yet. Give it time.....................
A more likely excuse is "Large Marge" was too fat to get by without pushing the ICE officer.
It is odd. That's usually the first thing the idiots start shrieking. But then again they are still in the denial of the facts phase.
True. I guess they aren't used to facts being used in arresting and prosecuting people.
The very people who demand sympathy for Sleepy Joe are the same people who cheered when Trump was shot.
Yes Sir!
There are a group of exceptionally stupid mother fuckers who still claim it was all staged, you have to be beyond stupid or just fucked in the head to still believe that.
Take a look at those that are shrieking "where was the assault" and that "it was staged". NONE are Mensa candidates. Shit, they still believe Biden is doing just fine.
They are half right, the visit was a staged photo op by some morons who that they were above the law. If democrats have any integrity they will expel this rep if convicted.
Democrats have integrity? The last one that showed any integrity was killed in a motorcade in Texas.
Afterwards, in the White House to reporters, Trump hemmed and hawed and babbled incoherencies.
Putin knows Trump will never act, so why should he?
Who said that? Hillary Clinton?
Rep. LaMonica McIver should stall, appeal, file trivial motions to delay the case, and imitate all of trumps attempts to be "above the law".
As John Brennan once said Let her pay a lawyer in the meantime.
Legally she is permitted to do that. But I guess that's only a bad thing when the person stalling, appealing, and filing trivial motions hurt your feelings. Then the left will cry about it for years.
The problem she has is that there is video evidence of her crime. Your claims on Trump only really exist in the imagination of the left.
She might claim that her hands couldn't be controlled because she stuttered.
I wouldn't put that past them.
They have little respect for people's intelligence. Biden stuttered, she was pushed, Comey supposedly saw some shells and said to his wife "they look political' and CNN said the 2020 riots were "mostly peaceful."
It's hard to respect people intelligence when their IQ tests comeback in the negative.
I left out the part about all hell coming down on Biden's presidency and suddenly comes the announcement that he has terminal cancer, that takes about a decade to metastasize. Thus, we must stop talking about the great fraud and wish him well, sniff, sniff.
Yeah, not going to happen. This is announced just as the Hurr interview audio is released and Trump gets an immigration win from the SCOTUS? The timing is questionable.
That is the understatement of all time.
By now, anyone still buying their shit is deranged.
The officers should have assumed she had violent intentions and shot her in the neck to save the poor immigrants. that is the criteria we use now right?
What a radical 5 years the country went through.
If that’s what she wants to do, why would that upset anyone?
Unless they're republicans, violent insurrectionists, or named Trump.
It appears you have made a stupid post, if trump was found guilty, then obviously he was not above the law.
It appears that you have made a stupid reply. When is his sentencing scheduled?
When are the rest of his crimes scheduled to go to court?
My reply was based on facts, he was convicted so he isn't above the law like your absolutely ignorant comment said, he is a convicted felon, if you have a problem with the sentence giving talk to the piece of shit judge. he decides the sentence.
I guess you missed his sentencing back on Jan 10th.
The "law" doesn't stop at conviction. WHEN IS HIS SENTENCING???
Nope, didn't miss it. Can you name another 34 count felon with no sentence? Not even any parole?
So, your argument isn't with the "above the law" but with a piece of shit liberal judge.
Another stupid comment, the piece of shit liberal judge did sentence him, Liberal judges are as worthless as trumps sentence.
FFS you really need to pay closer attention. Sentencing was pronounced in JANUARY.
Even your government leftist bloggers reported it.
" During the brief hearing, New York state Judge Juan Merchan said the only lawful sentence that does not encroach on the office of the president is that of an unconditional discharge on all counts. "
Trump was not sentenced purely because of who he was. Otherwise he would probably spend the rest of his life in prison.
See above in response to your stupid reply.
Please list any other 34 count felon who had no penalties in his sentencing.
Why?
So the liberal judge made a decision as ignorant as your comment, he absolutely could have sentenced trump.
At a boy, move those goalposts. You bitched about sentencing and when the sentencing was pointed out you turn elsewhere? Got any other arguments you can't figure out?
You wanna bitch about his sentencing, take it up with the judge. Nobody here had anything to do with what the judge did.
Yep, but when it came down to it, lacked the balls....
That seems more likely than anything
With all the puffery that he showed during the whole process, to end like that. Yeah, the indicted Minnesota judge probably has bigger balls... lol
Yup, he made his decision because it was Trump. Thus proving my point.
Mine too...
The only point you have made is an ignorant partisan comments.
Trump was charged, went to court, was found guilty, and then sentenced. The fact you don’t like the sentence is irrelevant, by definition the law was followed.
[✘]
You like ignoring why the judge said Trump was not going to be punished. Don't you?
Or burning cities like Minneapolis and Kenosha all to protest a drug addict overdosing.
Funny that those violent riots get neglected.
Google is another totally biased piece of work. If you Google search for the 2020 riots that began the 5 years in which the US lost its collective sanity, usually the Jan 6th riot pops up.
You mean people who wandered into the open entrance to the Capitol. The FBI used facial recognition (not to be used on certain people) to get every one of them.
How many agents were there?
The doors were locked. The capitol was not open to the public that day. No one "wandered" into the building, every single one of them were trespassing, for openers.
Why did they have to scale the walls if they had a legal right to enter the building?
-
Looks like a do not enter sign to me
WRONG!
"An unsealed video of January 6 protesters entering the Capitol building through the windows and casually walking in has been viewed more than 1.7 million times on social media.
The video, shared by BuzzFeed News reporter Zoe Tillman on Twitter , showed dozens of people breaching the Capitol in Washington, D.C.
During the clip, supporters of former President Donald Trump could be seen entering through smashed windows and doors before proceeding to walk further into the building."
Unsealed January 6 Video Showing People Calmly Walking Inside Capitol Viewed 1.7M Times - Newsweek
The Capitol was not open to the public that day. Everyone who entered was breaking the law.
If some criminal breaks your front door down does that mean that everyone in the neighborhood is now allowed to enter your house on the basis that the door was open?
EXACTLY !
In the 2020 riots 24 people were killed. Did the FBI use facial recognition to get them?
NO, the FBI was AWOL for that.
Here: Feast your eyes on this:
I have looked at 4 or 5 videos of this "assault" and I still dont see anything that should rise to the level of an arrest.
Show us the video that you think best shows her beating on a cop.
You may have trouble seeing. The eyes of the jury may be better.
Stop stalling, just show us the video you think best shows her assaulting anyone.
I have not seen what the government has.
Have you?
So you have not seen a video that shows her assaulting anyone. Ok.
Clearly, even standing up against the manbaby they elected and voicing your dissent rises to the level of arrest in these rightwing conservative minds. Daring to challenge their conspiracy theories and refusing to just accept their lies automatically puts you on their hate list. Even hinting at throwing an elbow at their gestapo is a serious offense while attacking and beating any officers protecting the peaceful transfer of power away from their Dear Leader is considered justified and patriotic.
Pushing is assault...........if the LEO's want it to be. Don't try pushing a cop even though you think it is okay. Don't even TOUCH a cop because if he had or is having a shitty day, don't refuse to identify yourself, one might just learn those protocols from an inside point of view..
She's attempting to push her way through and the cop is in the way. You still don't push...............your agenda is of no value to them and their job and objective.
The videos that are public show a chaotic scene where numerous people were pushing and being pushed. I didnt see her throw an elbow but it seems possible. People get panicky when they are in a scrum.
Arrested for assault seems way out of line to me.
I have seen one from Mediaite:
Body Cam Footage of NJ Mayor Arrest Shows Democrats Shoving
Of course, when the government goes to court, they will bring the best possible videos.
Did you just want to tell me that it doesn't look all that bad to you?
Again, I am sure the government has a nice clear video.
This is the moment when she allegedly assaulted the ice cop by elbowing him
at the same time someone is pushing her from behind.
The fact is it was a chaotic situation and pushing and shoving happens when people are caught in an enclosed space.
If this is their evidence it amounts to next to nothing.
Your definition of "standing up?"
Depends on your standard. If its how BLm rioters were treated, any charges would be out of line.
If it's how J6 rioters were treated, it's absolutely in line with how they were treated.
Where do you see her being pushed?
That she caused. Again, do you not recall J6 and how the protesters were charged?
Flip, Flop.
There isnt a chance in hell she will be convicted of attacking a police officer. The indictment is harassment.
Jersey is a tough venue. Time will tell.
What happened in the 2020 riots was not right. They should have all been prosecuted. But that is not a defense for what happened at the Capitol riots. I know what I saw that day, and it was insane.
No, she is being touched from behind, not pushed. In the real world, you don't aggressively lay hands on LEO's, that amounts to assault or interference.
I don't think crawling on the wall was illegal, when they just could have walked up the stairs.
Any thoughts on dems protesting a detention center that houses violent illegals? What is it with dems coddling illegals and criminals?
Yeah.... who caused it to be a chaotic situation and what right did they have to make it so?
I love when we can agree.
But that is not a defense for what happened at the Capitol riots. I know what I saw that day, and it was insane.
You will admit that those involved directly or indirectly in Jan 6th were prosecuted.
And pardoned which I find offensive, especially the ones who attacked cops and did physical damage to the Capitol.
I can understand that. I found aspects of it offensive as well. However, I found that a bunch of average Joes getting a pardon after serving 4 years and losing their jobs etc, seemed a bit less offensive than the vice president of the US (who would run for president) publicly supporting the Minnesota Freedom Fund, a nonprofit group that fundraised to bail out the few 2020 rioters who were actually jailed. At least you can take a little solace in the fact that the Jan 6th protestors served a good 4 years. For me, who detests the violent protestors of the left, there is no consolation.
Somebody has to do the jobs that they are too lazy to do.
Obama’s right hand man is going on about 15 years.
Good for the DOJ. She should be punished just as severely as any j6 Protester who pushed a cop.
Hahahahaha. Still pushing that BS? It is the utmost in of lies, but what did we all expect from the Den of Thieves... Whoops, I mean the current administration. They have to do it, though. Wouldn't want anyone spreading the truth around.
The film doesn't lie Thomas. Neither do our own eyes, just like when we were told that Biden was ok.
Covington demonstrated to me that actual incontrovertible video evidence just doesn't matter to some progressives. The arguments some people continued to make after the full video was released left me feeling like I was in the twilight zone they were so disconnected from reality.
The media ran with a blatant lie and some of them had to pay for it.
No, film doesn't lie. it just depends on which you watch . you have asserted a fiction. and have yet to prove it.
you say she shoved. last week it was shoving in order to gain admittance to the detention facility. this week it is what, exactly?
as can be clearly seen in other video, she herself is being pushed. so the 'forearm shove' is really a catch of balance while she is being pushed towards the prison gates and into the facility. any other interpretation of this clear and substantial video evidence is wrong. period.
but go ahead. keep saying that the sky is fuchsia and that the doj is lead by anywhere near competent people, and i will keep laughing at the stupidity displayed in your commentary.
have a nice day
The DHS has released the video they are going to use.
it was shoving in order to gain admittance to the detention facility.
Correct. Congress people have every right to visit an ICE facility after making an appointment. They didn't do that. They tried to push their way in when the gate was opened to admit a vehicle.
“Members of Congress storming into a detention facility goes beyond a bizarre political stunt and puts the safety of our law enforcement agents and detainees at risk,” DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin wrote in a statement shortly after the incident.
“Members of Congress are not above the law and cannot illegally break into detention facilities. Had these members requested a tour, we would have facilitated a tour of the facility. This is an evolving situation.”
McLaughlin told The Hill after the scuffle that arresting the three reps was “definitely on the table.”
“We actually have body camera footage of some of these members of Congress assaulting our ICE enforcement officers, including body-slamming a female ICE officer, so we will be showing that to viewers very shortly,” McLaughlin said.
Video shows lefty NJ reps 'storm' Newark ICE facility housing MS-13 members in 'bizarre political stunt'
"If any person, regardless of political party, influence or status, assaults a law enforcement officer as we witnessed Congresswoman McIver do, you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law."
Just more total bullshit coming from the rightwing conservative Christo fascists bent on destroying our constitutional republic. You shouldn't believe anything these lying sacks of human garbage say, lies come more naturally to them than truth because they live in a fictional universe of their own making called the MAGAverse where truth and reality are not welcome, but hypocrisy and conspiracy theories run rampant. In their world beating an officer within an inch of his life with a metal flagpole is something to be cheered and defended while an errant elbow should be seen as an attempt to take an officer's life. The difference is which side of the political fence the offender is on, because to Trump loving boot licking sycophants anything is justified, even beating officers in the name of their new chosen dear Leader.
How many Jan 6th rioters assaulted cops?
Give us an answer with a link.
And show me one protester who assaulted cops on J6 (it would of course be easy to show thousands from other 2020 protests) who democrats didn't think should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. If they believe this congresswoman should get off scot free, they must have made that argument about at least one violent J6 protester, right?
They all got prosecuted BEYOND the full extent of the law.
Still desperately trying to defend the indefensible. Not that I'm surprised. I don't believe a word coming out of any Trump supporters twisted lips as they've clearly abandoned their fealty to America in favor of giving their all to a single very flawed conman.
Your analogy was to the Jan 6th rioters, all of whom, no matter how little their involvement were punished.
It is you who are trying to defend the indefensible.
And I'm the one not surprised.
Here is a link to what the Police think about it:
You can't say that you support the police and then disregard this.
Come now Perrie, what would and do, the Police have to do with this...? Why the heck would their take be taken into consideration?
“And show me one protester who assaulted cops on J6…”
No, they stormed the People’s House with the intention to overturn a duly held election…instigated, encouraged, and ultimately pardoned by the indisputable loser of that election. How this is defended and minimized is beyond belief.
bingo
Amazing "Nuh Uh!" "No, you are!" defense.
They were supposed to be punished but tiny hands poopy pants couldn't let any of his violent defenders actually be punished by serving their full sentences.
Anyone with more than half a brain can see that conservatives just love pretending they're righteous and moral and love law and order until that law and order is inconvenient for them or threatens to incarcerate one of their conservative heroes. In their minds, if a law is trying to keep them from doing whatever the fuck they want or might hold them accountable for their violent ignorant racist actions, then to hell with the law because a law that doesn't bow to rightwing white conservative Christians shouldn't be a law. Hypocrites.
The Police Executive Research Forum is a nonprofit association of progressive police professionals dedicated to improving service
I didn't realize progressive NGO's speak for all police. So we are clear, if any organization affiliated with conservative ICE agents supports her prosecution, no one can disagree with them and claim to support law enforcement.
Cut the hysteria and lets compare apples to apples. I have no problem with any J6 protester who so much as pushed a cop being legally charged for it. The congresswoman should be treated the exact same under the same law.
Why do so many progressives think they should be allowed to assault police consequence free yet everyone else should be punished to the fullest extent of the law?
I think I'll defer to what Sean said about it in Post # 9.1.10.
Someone here called it the Pee Wee Herman response. How does one respond to projection?
They were supposed to be punished but tiny hands poopy pants couldn't let any of his violent defenders actually be punished by serving their full sentences.
The fact is they were sitting in jail long before they were given a trial. Not exactly due process as far as a speedy trial. Their pardons included time served.
Nicolle Wallace: "You are back in the middle of a political firestorm."
James Comey: "Yeah, for walking on the beach with my wife."
How many think that Comey lied about every bit of that "beach" story?
He wanted attention as he's selling a book. He got it.
Another textbook example of just how hypocritical democrats like Hakeem Jeffries and those supporting him are. Watching them go to bat for McIver after she battered and blocked LEO's is just picture perfect. The only thing that matters to them is partisan politics and no principle lasts long enough to get in the way of shilling for whatever Democrats need in the moment. What a way to go through life, with their minds completely captured by a party.
That is what makes the left so dangerous.
Perhaps someday all these lying hypocritical Trump sycophants will tell us in their own words what it was like being a bellycrawling boot licker of the tangerine tyrant. Eventually their infatuation with fascism will fade and all they'll be left with are Trumps crimes laid at their feet and they'll be asked "Why?" Why did they decide to dishonor their country, bow to dictators, abandon their morals and start shilling for a fat greasy dumb shit convicted felon and accused rapist and child molester? I hope their answer is better than just "cause I hate liberals" but that's most likely the truth. These mental midgets just hate liberals and they have nothing to offer so they can only attack that which their tiny brains have trouble understanding or assimilating to.
Perhaps someday we will be rid of the evil far left degenerates who insanely ran the country under Joe Biden. From BLM & antifa to DEI and trans insanity, it was pure insanity. The cherry on top was when Mark Milley and Defense secretary Loyd Austin make Kendi recommended reading for members of the military and our universities began moving away from SAT scores and merit.
Donald Trump is leading a counter revolution, and I believe it can continue after he is gone. We need normalcy and American exceptionalism back. Most of all we need to rid our institutions of the insidious left's grip.
There is nothing 'normal' about the rabid right. We need that kind of 'normal' like we need a hole in the head.
Oh, I forgot that some basic morons think they get to define 'evil' and enforce their religious beliefs on others contrary to the constitution. Thankfully the constitution hasn't been completely shredded by the LARPing rightwing conservative Christian crusaders.
Just more fan fiction from the rightwing peanut gallery. The Biden years were fine and you know it. It was relatively smooth sailing with very few scandals and no major upheavals creating uncertainty. Was it the best? Nope. But it certainly wasn't the worst as we now know.
Donald Trump is a joke and a conman and only those with their heads shoved firmly up his ass can't see it.
We are only exceptional when we're honest, humble and capable of empathy for the least of us. "For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.” - Luke 14:11
I find it truly comical that these self-proclaimed morally superior rightwing religious conservatives try to claim their right to condemn anyone and everyone around them of being 'sinners' while they do absolutely zero self-reflection which essentially proves they're not actually followers of Christ. They're just followers of a convicted felon, sexual predator, known adulterer and accused rapist that they fell in love with when he started whispering sweet nothings in their ears like "You white conservatives should be proud Americans, you're so smart, so talented, so beautiful, I mean the most beautiful, if you weren't my constituents I'd probably be dating you, so why are you letting these evil satanic crazy liberals walk around unpunished as if they have rights and should be respected? Huh? Well I'll stand up for you, I'll make America white again! I'll make America Christian again! I'll make America reject all that 'higher learning' and 'Harvard N%&%#*'s' like Obama!" and oh did the Tea party bigots and rightwing religious conservatives loooooove hearing that, which is where we find ourselves here today.
That should stan by itself.
Stay in the basement, we'll get you elected, then you mouth the words we give you and do as we tell you.
Hakeem Jeffries says it’s “entirely inappropriate” for Republicans to discuss such “conspiracy theories" after the cancer diagnosis.
“Republicans want to look backward…Democrats are going to look forward."
Translation: Hakeem Jeffries wants talk of the Biden cognitive coverup shut down.
They can't help but look backwards with their twisted necks and twisted morals and twisted leader. They live in the past and need to be left there, they offer absolutely nothing to a prosperous American future.
Some of them brag about wanting to go back to the past.
I wouldn't call it bragging, but i would like to go back to a time where mediocre male athletes with mental disorders weren't competing against female athletes to stroke their egos.
Why not go back even further to when most MAGAites think America was at its greatest, back when black athletes weren't allowed to compete with white athletes either.
But if transgender competitors were the only issue, then we can come to an agreement. I personally believe a transgender athlete born male and wanting to compete in women's sports should be treated just like a female athlete who had been exposed to years of testosterone doping. I see no difference between them trying to compete with women who have never gone through testosterone doping and Barry Bonds competing with hitters who had not been doping. There will always be an asterisk by their names even if they are allowed to compete.
The problem is the general feeling and attitude the MAGAites want to return to was the world where they were in charge and everyone else, blacks, Hispanics, Jews, anyone else who wasn't a WASP, was treated as a second-class citizen and women were expected to stay quiet at home and pregnant. And for the lgtbq community it was either be openly attacked and reviled or forced to stay in the closet.
That's the America these sick religious conservative fucks want to take us back to. The classic 'Leave it To Beaver' America where unsightly things like racial equality, gender equality, worker equality and the fight for human rights were always left off the screen. Leave it to Beaver ran from 1957 to 1963. It was literally airing during the crisis over integration at Little Rock’s Central High School in Arkansas, but you'd never have noticed on the show with the only speaking part for a black actor being a maid. That's the America MAGAites pine for.
What kind of blithering idiot would want to go back that kind of Democrat stupidity? Even today we see Democrats telling those they oppressed that they can't get along with Affirmative Action / DEI / or what ever the fuck you all are going to call that discrmination this week.
Jefferies can eat shit.
I look forward to him having a steady diet of it.
"A New Orleans prison maintenance worker accused of helping 10 inmates break out last week was arrested late Monday, according to multiple reports.
Sterling Williams, 33, allegedly cut off the water in the cells at the Orleans Parish Justice Center so the inmates could pull the toilet from the wall and escape," ABC News reported, citing sources.
The left might just have a new hero.
Another trial has garnered nationwide attention:
This just in:
"Dr. Kevin O'Connor, former President Joe Biden 's White House physician, is facing calls to testify under oath after Biden announced on Sunday that he had been diagnosed with an "aggressive" form of prostate cancer ."
O'Connor could not immediately be reached for comment.
Good , then he can clear up all the bogus assumptions from the right.
There was an expert on Morning Joe who said Biden probably had it for about 10 years and it would be hard to miss
You mean like "Biden is capable", "Biden is qualified", "Biden is doing fine"? Those kind of bogus assumptions?
One has to wonder who was really in charge during the whole Biden presidency*.
It's starting to appear he was totally out of it on day one. Who really issued all those EO's and was manipulating the autopen.
This whole sorry sordid shit show reminds me of the controversial "Nazi" Star Trek TOS episode.
Biden strongly resembles the drugged John Gill. Who knows, perhaps Biden's handlers had him drugged up at times.
Patterns of Force (Star Trek: The Original Series) - Wikipedia
Tulsi Gabbard is trying to find out who used the autopen for him. Those pardons may not hold up.
Trumps autopen was named Elon, his mandateto the prom intent on doing US harm, The position ignorance elevated this awful decision that is become a scarred incision we will always carry
That will start one hell of a shitstorm among the Democrats. Would be fun to watch.
WTF was that?[✘]
It will make for some interesting reading here.
Gee, it seems like I've watched Trump personally sign mountains of EOs.
If no one is above the law, then why is Trump not in prison for 34 felony convictions?
That is the question you should be asking the piece of shit liberal judge who sentenced him.
If someone is convicted of a felony, they should not be sentenced, is that what you're saying?
Because they were bullshit prosecutions. If he was prosecuted for having orange hair, would you consider it "law?"
The left would write a new law making orange hair on presidents and presidential candidates illegal, the repeal it in 2029
Felonies are BS to you?
Yes, that is the principle of lawfare.
There is a video that, at worst, shows a congresswoman jostling with a couple ICE cops. They are all enclosed in a tight space and there was something that could best be described as bumping. Is charging her with a crime for that an example of lawfare?