╌>

Air Force to provide funeral honors to Ashli Babbitt

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  gregtx  •  last year  •  121 comments

By:   Ella Lee (The Hill)

Air Force to provide funeral honors to Ashli Babbitt
The U.S. Air Force will provide Jan. 6 rioter Ashli Babbitt with military funeral honors, reversing a Biden-era decision that denied her family's request, according to a legal group that has represented her family.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


The U.S. Air Force will provide Jan. 6 rioter Ashli Babbitt with military funeral honors, reversing a Biden-era decision that denied her family's request, according to a legal group that has represented her family.

Judicial Watch, the conservative legal group, on Wednesday made public a letter from Under Secretary of the Air Force Matthew Lohmeier, extending an offer to allow the special funeral procedures to take place.

"I understand that the family's initial request was denied by Air Force leadership in a letter dated February 9, 2021," Lohmeier wrote in the Aug. 15 letter shared by Judicial Watch. "However, after reviewing the circumstances of Ashli's death, and considering the information that has come forward since then, I am persuaded that the previous determination was incorrect."

He additionally extended an invitation to her mother and husband to meet him at the Pentagon, so he may offer his condolences.

The Hill requested comment from the Pentagon regarding the veracity of the letter.

Babbitt, an Air Force veteran, was shot and killed by law enforcement during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot as she attempted to climb through a barricaded door to the Speaker's lobby near the House chamber.

A month after the riot, an Air Force representative under former President Biden's administration informed her family that military funeral honors were denied for her funeral "due to the circumstances preceding her death."

"As a result, I have determined that military funeral honors would bring discredit upon the Air Force," Brian Kelly, an Air Force lieutenant general, wrote in that letter.

An eligible veteran's honor guard detail consists of at least two members of the armed forces, one of whom is a representative of the veteran's service branch, according to the Department of Veterans Affairs. It will perform a ceremony including the playing of taps and the folding and presentation of the American flag to the next of kin.

"Ashli Babbitt's family is grateful to President Trump, Secretary [Pete] Hegseth and Under Secretary Lohmeier for reversing the Biden Defense Department's cruel decision to deny Ashli funeral honors as a distinguished veteran of the Air Force," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement.

In May, the government agreed to pay Babbitt's family nearly $5 million as part of a settlement.

It came as the Trump administration has sought to unravel the Biden administration's crackdown on those who participated in the riot.

Trump pardoned nearly all rioters on his first day back in the White House and fired dozens of prosecutors who worked on criminal cases stemming from the attack.

The Air Force could not be reached for comment.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
GregTx
Professor Participates
1  seeder  GregTx    last year
"I understand that the family's initial request was denied by Air Force leadership in a letter dated February 9, 2021," Lohmeier wrote in the Aug. 15 letter shared by Judicial Watch. "However, after reviewing the circumstances of Ashli's death, and considering the information that has come forward since then, I am persuaded that the previous determination was incorrect."
 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    last year

The MAGA Defense Dept is honoring traitors now. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
2.1  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @2    last year

"I am persuaded that the previous determination was incorrect."

John - although you might not always agree, others have done a further evaluation and determined that the 2021 decision, by the Biden administration, was the incorrect decision in her case.

The Biden Crime Family made many bad decisions during their "reign" and those decisions need to be corrected - whether you agree with them or not.  Just the way the wheels of justice roll.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  1stwarrior @2.1    last year

The Undersecretary of the Air Force is an unqualified conspiracy theorist, and trump bootlicker. . 

As for Ashli Babbitt, she violently entered a restricted area that was locked and barricaded.  The cop was standing his ground in service of protecting the members of the U.S. House of Representatives.  There was a mob outside that door and if Babbitt had succeeded in disarming the cop the mob would have been let in.  The cop did his job and Babbitt was a traitor. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1.2  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.1    last year

She was not being violent. Nor was she a traitor. She was unarmed and her hands were in plain view of Lt. Byrd

Tnks was an unjustified shooting regardless of how or why she was there. The US paid a wrongful death lawsuit.

Air Force Reverses This Biden Administration Decision on Ashli Babbitt .   From the article......

.

Many well-documented facts now clearly show that the fatal shooting was not justified. For example, Ashli was the only official homicide on January 6, 2021. Ashli, age 35, was unarmed when she was fatally shot. She stood 5’3’ tall and weighed 115 pounds. Her hands were up in the air, empty, and in plain view of Lt. Byrd and four armed officers behind him. Seven additional armed officers were behind Ashli, including four Containment and Emergency Response Team officers. Ashli posed no threat to the safety of any officer nor any Member of Congress who stayed after Member evacuation. Ashli was begging officers to call for backup before she was shot. Officers ignored Ashli. The only shot fired that day was the one Lt. Byrd fired to kill Ashli. Lt. Byrd was not in uniform. Lt. Byrd did not identify himself as a police officer or otherwise make his presence known to Ashli. Lt. Byrd also did not give Ashli any warnings or commands before firing the shot that killed her. Ashli never saw Lt. Byrd because he was hidden from her view. She was ambushed and defenseless. Multiple witnesses at the scene yelled, “you just murdered her.” Lt. Byrd later told the world on NBC Nightly News that he “had no clue” about the individual he shot. “I didn't even know it was a female until hours, way later ... that night,” he said. ( Judicial Watch )

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1.2    last year
She was not being violent. Nor was she a traitor. She was unarmed and her hands were in plain view of Lt. Byrd

This is totally ridiculous. She went in through a bashed in window. The bashing of that window, which she took part in , is violence.   She was a traitor, all of them were.  How was thecop supposed to know she was unarmed, and it doesnt matter anyway. If he let her in there is a chance she could have overpowered him and then opened the door for the rest of the mob. 

There are photos of  ununiformed police inside the House with their guns drawn as they waited to see if the mob would try to enter. Do you think they were going to just stand aside and let the insurrectionists in?  No they would have shot them. That was their job and duty. 

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.1.4  goose is back  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.1    last year
The cop was standing his ground in service of protecting the members

Bullshit, the pussy cop was hiding in a doorway and shot her without warning. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
3  Sparty On    last year

Good.    Long overdue

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
3.1  MrFrost  replied to  Sparty On @3    last year

She is a criminal, got what she deserved. Break into my house? Same result. 

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
3.1.1  goose is back  replied to  MrFrost @3.1    last year
She is a criminal, got what she deserved.

So, you are fine with any law enforcement officer shooting without warning anyone who enters a Government Building when they feel they are trespassing. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
3.1.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  goose is back @3.1.1    last year
without warning anyone who enters a Government Building when they feel they are trespassing

Do you believe that Ashli Babbitt made it all the way to that point in breaching that inner door without ever being warned that she was trespassing? How many times did she likely ignore warnings to get to that point of breaching that inner door of the capital building? How many times should people be allowed to ignore warnings when trespassing into Government buildings? What's the polite number of warnings you're allowed to ignore when trespassing in a government building? Please, I'd really love to know.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3.1.2    last year

The doors to the Capitol building were locked. That is why the mob had to break windows to get in.  A locked door means you are not allowed inside. The police would have been justified to shoot everyone who entered the building. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
3.1.4  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3.1.2    last year
Do you believe that Ashli Babbitt made it all the way to that point in breaching that inner door without ever being warned that she was trespassing?

It would be great if you could provide evidence that she had been warned several times that she was trespassing.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
3.1.5  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1.4    last year
It would be great if you could provide evidence that she had been warned several times that she was trespassing.

Babbitt-Thumb.jpg?quality=85&strip=all

Do these guards look like they're just hanging out off duty or are they attempting to prevent entry? Do you believe that none of those officers told the screaming Ashli Babbitt to leave the premises? Really? You don't believe they gave any warnings or told those pressing in on them that they were trespassing? Really?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
3.1.6  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.3    last year
The doors to the Capitol building were locked.

You sure about that?  

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
3.1.7  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3.1.5    last year

I watched the video MANY times, and if you can hear or lip-read ANY of the "guards" saying those words, a timestamp may be in order. Just not sure it's there. They were all a bit confused as to what was going on and if I remember correctly, they moved when they realized it may be futile, and also the fact that there were reinforcements coming up the stairs.

Just not so sure, in the heat of the moment, they thought it would do any good.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
3.1.8  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1.7    last year
a timestamp may be in order

That brings another problem into the mix.  If you remember the J6 Committee has been accused of altering their "evidence".  We already know they altered Trump's comments from that day.  

We also know they withheld a lot of video during the "trials" and the vast majority of the "suspects" were heavily overcharged.

The committee that was put together was, 1.  Hand picked by Pelosi and 2.  Failed to complete their task.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.9  JohnRussell  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.6    last year
were the capitol doors locked on Jan 6th before the rioters enetered
copilot

Yes, the Capitol doors were locked and secured before rioters entered on January 6, 2021. The U.S. Capitol is protected 24/7 by Capitol Police, and access is restricted to authorized personnel with proper identification. On that day, temporary and permanent security barriers were in place around the building, including fencing, signage, and police barricades.

However, some doors were eventually breached or opened, and there has been controversy over how certain entrances—like the Columbus Doors on the east side—were accessed. These massive 20,000-pound doors are magnetically locked and typically require a security code or internal override to open. Some commentators have speculated they were opened from the inside, but no conclusive public evidence has confirmed who unlocked them or how.

The House Select Committee and federal investigators have reviewed hours of surveillance footage and internal communications, but as of now, the exact mechanism by which some doors were opened remains unclear, fueling ongoing debate and conspiracy theories.

If you’d like, I can walk you through the timeline of how different entry points were breached or explore how Capitol security protocols were altered after the attack.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
3.1.10  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.9    last year

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
3.1.11  goose is back  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3.1.2    last year
How many times should people be allowed to ignore warnings when trespassing into Government buildings?

I don't know how many times or is she was ever warned, if you know please provide it.  I do know that the security guards that where preventing the group which included Babbit (which you have so kindly posted a picture below) were removed from the area.  WHY.....Had they not been removed Babbit would have never been killed. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
3.1.12  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.3    last year

And, per all the videos, the police and other law enforcement members where in the crowd RIGHT NEXT TO HER and two were actually trying to PROTECT her.

Jjeezzz how in the hell can people be so friggin' blind???

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
3.1.13  1stwarrior  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1.4    last year

Never happen - never does.  Proof is a vague premise.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
3.1.14  MrFrost  replied to  goose is back @3.1.1    last year

So, you are fine with any law enforcement officer shooting without warning anyone who enters a Government Building when they feel they are trespassing. 

Are you saying she was too stupid to realize what she was doing was WRONG? Really? 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
3.1.15  MrFrost  replied to  goose is back @3.1.1    last year

So, you are fine with any law enforcement officer shooting without warning anyone who enters a Government Building when they feel they are trespassing. 

So you are fine with people breaking into your house, and you will do nothing to stop it? The doors were LOCKED, kinda screams out, "not welcome", doesn't it? 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
3.1.16  1stwarrior  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3.1.5    last year

Who was breaking in??  Who was the pistol pointed at?  Why so many LE's next to her/behind her and none appear to be attempting to stop her?  If it was such a threat, why were so many folks WALKING in the hallway and watching what was taking place instead of attempting to find an area of cover?

Don't listen to the rumors - watch the event - you'll learn more.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.17  JohnRussell  replied to  1stwarrior @3.1.16    last year

The mob was literally trying to bash the barricaded door in. Literally. She entered through a bashed in window. That IS violence whether you like it or not. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.18  JohnRussell  replied to  1stwarrior @3.1.16    last year

Suppose this was a police precinct and Antifa was trying to bash in doors and windows and enter, and a cop shot the first one through. Do you think his action would be questioned? LOL. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.1.19  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.18    last year

Considering how most on the left are cheering for criminals, illegals, etc, you can rest assured someone from the left will pitch a fit. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
3.1.20  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.17    last year

Funny how ALL THE PICS show that she was a good three feet from the door - so, how the hell could she have been "entering a bashed in window" that hadn't been bashed in YET and from three feet away???

nbcnews link at 3.1.16.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
3.1.21  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.18    last year

Haven't seen any of the west coast rioters being questioned for burning Fed buildings, threatening public officials, tearing up private property, beating up LE and other public officials.

Wonder why???

LOL

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
3.1.22  goose is back  replied to  MrFrost @3.1.15    last year
So you are fine with people breaking into your house,

No, not at all and had this been a residence she was entering there would be no discussion, she would be shot. Last time I checked trespassing in a government building is not a shoot first and ask questions later.   Babbit was breaking the law, being arrested was the proper punishment not death. 

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
3.1.23  goose is back  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.17    last year
She entered through a bashed in window

The "bashing" as you put it, didn't happen until the Security Guards that were posted in front of the doors that kept the protesters away were removed.  They were never harmed, never assaulted, why were they removed ? 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4  Tacos!    last year

All that is required, generally, for a funeral with military honors is that a veteran was discharged honorably. You can commit crimes afterward, and it doesn’t change eligibility for the funeral honors unless it was a capital crime - i.e.: a crime that carries the death penalty.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tacos! @4    last year
veteran was discharged honorably.

Haven't seen anything showing she wasn't.

You can commit crimes afterward

What crime was committed?

a crime that carries the death penalty.

Does that include death penalty carried out by an "officer" who should have never been on the job?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.1  Tacos!  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.1    last year

That’s dumb. All of it.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.1.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tacos! @4.1.1    last year

What's dumb is dodging simple questions.  

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.3  Tacos!  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.1.2    last year

If they’re so simple, maybe you should Google them. I’m not going answer obvious trolling with a genuine effort to educate you on something you already should know.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.1.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tacos! @4.1.3    last year
If they’re so simple, maybe you should Google them.

No shame in saying you don't know and don't know how to research.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.5  Tacos!  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.1.4    last year
No shame in saying you don't know and don't know how to research.

Fair enough. I won’t shame you.

I’m not the one asking “simple questions.” That was you. I already know what happened.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
4.1.6  1stwarrior  replied to  Tacos! @4.1.1    last year

Facts bother you?

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
4.1.7  1stwarrior  replied to  Tacos! @4.1.5    last year

No, you don't know what happened.  You're basing your discussions on "your" opinion(s) gathered from mass media - of which more than 80% is BS bleaching.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.8  Tacos!  replied to  1stwarrior @4.1.7    last year

I made a comment clarifying the regulations on military funeral honors. WTF are you referring to?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.9  Tacos!  replied to  1stwarrior @4.1.6    last year

What fact?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.1.10  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tacos! @4.1.5    last year
I’m not the one asking “simple questions.”

No.  You're the one that can't answer them.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
4.1.11  1stwarrior  replied to  Tacos! @4.1.8    last year

"I already know what happened" was the basis for my comment about opinionated comments.

Sorry.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.12  Tacos!  replied to  1stwarrior @4.1.11    last year

I feel like you guys put way too much effort into trying to “win” something here. I’m just here to have a conversation.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.13  Tacos!  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.1.10    last year
You're the one that can't answer them.

Did you have a serious question about military funeral honors? Because that’s all my comment was about. You act like we’re supposed to be fighting over something, but I don’t know what your beef is.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.1.14  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tacos! @4.1.13    last year
Did you have a serious question about military funeral honors?

The questions were asked in 4.1.  Start there.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.15  Tacos!  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.1.14    last year
What you wrote in that reply made no sense. I tried to save you from having me break it down for you, but since you won’t let it go…. Haven't seen anything showing she wasn't.

Great. Neither have I. So?

What crime was committed?

I didn’t say she committed a crime, and I’m not here to prosecute her.

Does that include death penalty carried out by an "officer" who should have never been on the job?

It has no connection to an officer shooting in self defense. Police officers are not carrying out a penalty when they do that. I have no information or concern for whether or not that cop should have been on the job. None of that was the focus of my comment. You clearly have some agenda related to this that has nothing to do with what I wrote. That is why I said your comment was dumb.

I hope you’re happy now. What a waste.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.1.16  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tacos! @4.1.15    last year
What you wrote in that reply made no sense. I tried to save you from having me break it down for you, but since you won’t let it go…. Haven't seen anything showing she wasn't.
Great. Neither have I. So?

Who the hell are you quoting?  Get yourself straight then we'll have a conversation.

I didn’t say she committed a crime

You can't say what crime was allegedly committed yet you think her murder is justified?  

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.17  Tacos!  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.1.16    last year
Who the hell are you quoting?

You. In 4.1. You wrote:

Haven't seen anything showing she wasn't.

And I responded. Do you really need so badly to pick a fight that you want to argue about whether or not you wrote that?

You can't say what crime was allegedly committed yet you think her murder is justified?

I didn’t say she committed a crime. I didn’t say she was murdered. I didn’t say her killing was justified.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.1.18  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tacos! @4.1.17    last year

Cherry picking just isn't you thing.  What I ask in 4.1:

What crime was committed?

Of which you haven't answered.

I also asked:

Does that include death penalty carried out by an "officer" who should have never been on the job?

Again, you haven't answered.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.19  Tacos!  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.1.18    last year

I answered everything in 4.1.15. Please read the thread and stop trying to pick pointless fights. If you don’t like my answers, that’s a you problem.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.1.20  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tacos! @4.1.19    last year

keep telling yourself that.   4.1.15 says otherwise.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tacos! @4    last year

then she is entitled to a military funeral. For that matter so am I

I hate that she was Air Force. We were taught to be better than than in basic

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.2    last year

She doesnt deserve a damn thing, but if she is entitled by long standing rules then her family will get the military honors for her. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.1    last year

And that's who it should go to. Her family

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
4.2.3  1stwarrior  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.2.2    last year

Well, since she is deceased, kinda looks like it will go to the family and not her.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.2.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.2.2    last year
She doesnt deserve a damn thing

That's one unfounded opinion.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.2.5  Trout Giggles  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.2.4    last year

I'm not the one who said that

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.2.6  Trout Giggles  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.2.4    last year

crickets

Never a correction or admitting to a mistake

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.2.7  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.2.6    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
4.3  1stwarrior  replied to  Tacos! @4    last year

Per DoD, funerals with military honors require 

Who is eligible for Military Funeral Honors?
  • Military members who died while on active duty.
  • Veterans who served in the active military, naval, or air service and were discharged or released from that service by means of an “honorable” or “under honorable conditions” discharge.
  • Members or former members of the Selected Reserves and were discharged or released from service by means of an “honorable” or “under honorable conditions” discharge.

Don't see any caveat regarding "capital crimes" as a disqualified member.

Hint - hint - show me???

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.3.1  Tacos!  replied to  1stwarrior @4.3    last year

This seems(?) official. It claims to be a DoD website.

Military Funeral Honors Eligibility

The following persons are not eligible for military funeral honors:

  • Individuals separated from the armed forces under dishonorable conditions or those who have been barred from veteran’s benefits
  • Those who have been convicted of a federal or state capital crime
  • A person who is found to have committed but who has not yet been convicted of a federal or state capital crime by reason of their not being available for trial due to their death or flight to avoid prosecution
  • A person convicted of a federal or state crime causing the person to be a Tier III sex offender
  • Anyone who was ordered to report to an induction station but was not actually inducted into military service
  • Any person who the secretaries of the military department deny military funeral honors
 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.3.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tacos! @4.3.1    last year
A person who is found to have committed but who has not yet been convicted of a federal or state capital crime by reason of their not being available for trial due to their death or flight to avoid prosecution

I assume that they had to have been indicted at least?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.3.3  Tacos!  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.3.2    last year

I don’t know. If I really wanted to delve deep, I’d have to see the law, which might be UCMJ or some other US Code. And even then, there may be case law on it.

Like if cops are chasing a suspected murderer, and he dies in the attempt to subdue him, how would that count? I don’t know. In the eyes of cops, at least, he committed a capital crime and he was fleeing. 

And even then the secretaries of the armed services have discretion.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.3.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tacos! @4.3.1    last year
  • Individuals separated from the armed forces under dishonorable conditions or those who have been barred from veteran’s benefits

No record of that happening.

  • Those who have been convicted of a federal or state capital crime
  • A person who is found to have committed but who has not yet been convicted of a federal or state capital crime by reason of their not being available for trial due to their death or flight to avoid prosecution

The problem with that is there was no arrest, there were no charges.  Just her murder.  

So, reality is, she and her family are owed the honors despite the crying of the Democrats and the left.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
4.3.5  1stwarrior  replied to  Tacos! @4.3.1    last year

Thanks Tacos - don't know why "Google" didn't bring that one up during my search.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5  Vic Eldred    last year

Greg, thank you for posting this.

She was murdered.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @5    last year

What do you suggest the officer should have done after she breached the locked and barricaded door ? 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
5.1.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1    last year

Maybe a taser?  What would you be saying if she was a person of color?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.1.1    last year
What would you be saying if she was a person of color?

The same thing. 

The cop was faced with a violent mob. They werent violent you say ? The hell they werent. He was 5 feet away from people bashing in the windows that stood between him and the mob, and about 25 feet away from the entrance to the House Of Representatives, whose protection was his job. 

How many people were really surprised when he shot her? Very very few.  It was his job to keep everyone from breaching that door. 

Ashley Babbitt's death was tragic,  I dont think she thought she was volunteering to lose her life for Donald Trump, but that was the result. 

Lets say the mob broke through and there were still 20 representatives in that chamber -  would their safety have been in danger then? 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5.1.3  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.2    last year

No evidence has ever surfaced that the so called "mob" was there to harm the representative, as videos show many of them wandering around the building being escorted by guards,

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.1.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.2    last year
he same thing

Really? When a 300 pound man who'd already tried to steal an officer's gun turned and charged him, you called it murder when the officer shot him.   But a petite, unarmed woman is a threat to life, huh? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.1.4    last year

You are the king of whataboutism on NT.

Babbitts size has nothing to do with what the cop was required to do. 

Do you have any condemnation for a mob that was bashing in a door that was clearly locked and BARRICADED?   Barricaded in itself should have signaled to the mob that there were serious consequences for breaching that door.  What lawful person tries to enter a room that was barricaded off by law enforcement? 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.1.6  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.5    last year
Babbitts size has nothing to do with what the cop was required to do.

Of course it does. She was unarmed. Size is incredibly important when guns aren't involved. It's why combat sports have weight classes.

ou have any condemnation for a mob that was bashing in a door that was clearly locked and BARRICADED?

Of course. It just strains belief that you can defend this shooting and call the Brown shooting murder. [deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1.7  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1    last year
What do you suggest the officer should have done after she breached the locked and barricaded door ? 

Act like Kevin Bacon in Animal House

"All is well!"

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.1.8  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.5    last year

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
5.1.9  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.2    last year

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
5.1.10  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.1.9    last year

The answer to that quesztion is really no..........they were stupid but not THAT stupid and had they got in, they probably would have slipped and fell in the puddles where the reps pissed themselves............or more.

Where was Nadler by the way?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.1.11  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.1.1    last year
What would you be saying if she was a person of color?

Short answer, no they wouldn't.  

The very people who have their panties in a wad over what happened that day are the same people who supported the 2020 riots over a drug addicts overdose.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
5.1.12  Sparty On  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.1.6    last year
Your opinion is obviously driven by partisanship. 

Exactly.    This isn’t about the guard or Ashli Babbitt.    They could give a shit about either of them.     It’s about Trump and nothing else.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
5.1.14  Sparty On  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5.1.11    last year

And are supporting attacks on law enforcement still today.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
5.1.15  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1    last year

Ddduuhhhh - with all the videos available for you to review, how 'bout providing the one(s) showing were she "breached the locked and barricaded door".

We'll wait.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.1.16  bugsy  replied to  1stwarrior @5.1.15    last year

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.1.17  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  bugsy @5.1.16    last year

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.18  JohnRussell  replied to  bugsy @5.1.16    last year

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.19  JohnRussell  replied to  bugsy @5.1.16    last year
did ashely babbitt enter a locked and barricaded door
co-pilot

Yes, Ashli Babbitt attempted to enter a locked and barricaded door inside the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. Multiple sources confirm that she was shot while trying to climb through the broken window of a door leading to the Speaker’s Lobby, which had been barricaded by furniture and guarded by armed officers24.

🔐 Security Context

  • The Speaker’s Lobby is adjacent to the House chamber, where members of Congress were being evacuated.

  • The door was physically barricaded and visibly damaged, with shattered glass panes.

  • Capitol Police had issued verbal warnings and drawn weapons to prevent entry.

📸 What Happened

  • Babbitt was part of a crowd trying to breach the final barrier to the House chamber.

  • She attempted to climb through the broken window when she was shot by Lt. Michael Byrd, a Capitol Police officer.

  • The shooting was later deemed lawful and within department policy, with investigators concluding it likely prevented further harm to lawmakers.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.31  JohnRussell  replied to    last year

Jesus Christ man, it is on video. On the video you can see them tying to bash in the door, you can see that the door is barricaded , you can see seven seconds pass from the time the cop shows his gun and babbitt climbed through the window , and during those seven seconds people were yelling "he's got a gun". WTF was wrong with her ? 

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
5.1.37  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.31    last year

Most of this thread was removed for taunting and no value. Knock it off. Only warning.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
5.1.38  Right Down the Center  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.1.7    last year

Great movie that could never be made today.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
5.2  MrFrost  replied to  Vic Eldred @5    last year

She was murdered.

So was George Floyd. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.2.1  bugsy  replied to  MrFrost @5.2    last year
So was George Floyd. 

Not according to the coroner.

He overdosed because he was a POS druggie.

Nothing more, but keep falling at the feet of his statue.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  MrFrost @5.2    last year

Self inducted drug overdose isn't murder.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
5.2.3  Right Down the Center  replied to  MrFrost @5.2    last year

The more people try to promote debunked bullshit as fact the less credibility they have.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
5.2.4  MrFrost  replied to  bugsy @5.2.1    last year
He overdosed because he was a POS druggie.

So what babbit, she got what she deserved. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
5.2.5  MrFrost  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5.2.2    last year

Self inducted drug overdose isn't murder.

Let me put my knee on your neck for 9 minutes... Then we can talk. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
5.2.6  MrFrost  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.2.3    last year

The more people try to promote debunked bullshit as fact the less credibility they have.

LOL I am aware... What did the jury decide again?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
6  Right Down the Center    last year

When we were looking into a military cemetery for my father (including full military honors) it was during a time when a person was actually being dug up because they found out he murdered someone and could no longer be buried there.  It was one of the few times a person has lost military honors.  It was specifically because of the murder.  Don't think Ashley rises to that.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7  JohnRussell    last year
She never made it to the door to breach it.

This comment is idiotic. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.1  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @7    last year
this ashley babbitt climbing through the doorway window
ErGCe0HVcAM7Yag.jpg

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
8  Sparty On    last year

This seed is idiotic.     She was honorably discharged so she earned military honors at her funeral.    Your opinion on the issue doesn’t matter.

Get over it.

The really bad thing here is that the Biden administration refused her that earned honor.

 
 
 
fineline
Freshman Silent
8.1  fineline  replied to  Sparty On @8    last year

"The really bad thing here..." is TAX PAYERS had to cough up 5 million because her family raised a TRAITOR !!!! [deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
8.1.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  fineline @8.1    last year

Some folks play fast and loose with terms like fascist and TRAITOR.

 
 
 
fineline
Freshman Silent
8.1.2  fineline  replied to  Right Down the Center @8.1.1    last year

[deleted"opinions] [✘] vary". May she burn....

 
 

Who is online







101 visitors